International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET)

Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2017, pp. 728733 Article ID: IJCIET_08_01_086

Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=1
ISSN Print: 0976-6308
6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316
0976

IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed

STUDY ON BEHAVIOR OF ALKALI ACTIVATED

FLYASH BASED GEOPOLYMER
GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE
CH. HEMA SINDHUSHA
PG Student, Civil Engineering Department,
K L University, A. P, India

V. RANGA RAO
Assoc. Professor, Civil Engineering Department,
K L University, A. P, India

ABSTRACT
Objectives: This
his study is to identify the effect of parameter such as Activator ratio that
affectss the properties of alkali activated fly ash-based
ash based geopolymer concrete.
Methodology: To achieve the above objectives, the present investigation is adopted a
technology that is currently in use to manufacture and to test the conventional concrete. The
main aim of this activity was to facilitate promotion of new materials later on to the concrete
industry. Research variable included activator ratio (1:2, 1:2.5, and 1:3). The trial mix is
prepared for the molarity of 16 M. Concrete specimens were cured at room roo temperature. The
response variables are Flexural strength, Compressive strength and Split tensile strength.
Findings: Test data are used to identify the variation of Geopolymer concrete properties
which are affected by using of various activator ratios and curing period. At all ages, the
activator ratio 1:3 gives maximum strength and also economical when compared to other two
activator ratios. There is substantial gain in compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer
concrete with age.
Improvements: This work can be enhanced for various molarities under various
temperatures and various activator ratios.
Key words: Geopolymer concrete, Molarity, Strength, Activator ratio.
Cite this Article: Ch. Hema Sindhusha and V. Ranga Rao,
Rao Study on Behavior of Alkali
Activated Flyash based Geopolymer Concrete.
Concrete International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, 8(1), 2017, pp. 728733.
728
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=1

1. INTRODUCTION
Demand for concrete is increasing day by day.
day Manufacturing of cement requires burning of fuels and
decomposition of raw materials resulting in emissions of CO C 2 which causes pollution to the
environment. Geopolymer concrete had been introduced to reduce the environmental pollution
substitutes the cement with consequence such as fly ash, rice-
rice husk ash, silica fume, etc. The choice of

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.
IJCIET/index.asp 728 editor@iaeme.com
 Study on Behavior of Alkali Activated Flyash based Geopolymer Concrete

material for making of geopolymer concrete depends on factors such as availability and economy of
materials. Flyash is naturally occurring residue from combustion of coal. Geopolymer concrete is the
composite material resulting from the mixture of flyash with alkaline liquid, and aggregates. It is a
process for the flyash GPC where the Si and Al in the flyash which reacts with alkaline activators to
form a gel. Finally, geopolymer concrete is formed by using gel which is used to bind the aggregates
and un-reacted materials. Alkaline liquid used in this experiment was, the combination of NaOH and
Na2Sio3. Polymerisation process mainly depends on concentration of sodium hydroxide which is
expressed in terms of molar as well as type of curing. The trial mix is designed for the molarity of 16
M. The alkaline liquid to flyash ratio is 0.45.The main objective of this experiment was to study the
behaviour of geopolymer concrete for various activator ratios at various curing periods.

2. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
2.1 MATERIALS USED
Class F flyash
Fine aggregate
Coarse aggregate of 10 mm size
Chemicals used : Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) and Sodium Silicate (Na2SiO3)
Water (as per the requirement)

2.2 TRIAL MIX PROPORTIONS:

The trial mix proportions are prepared for various activator ratios are shown in Table-1.

Table 1 Trial mix proportions

Quantities
S. No. Description
1:2 1:2.5 1:3

1 Mass of Flyash (kg/m3) 413.8 413.8 413.8

2 Mass of Coarse Aggregate (kg/m3) 1260 1260 1260

3 Mass of Fine aggregate (kg/m3) 540 540 540

4 Liquid to Fly ash Ratio 0.45 0.45 0.45

5 Mass of NaOH Solution (kg/m3) 62.1 62.1 62.1

6 Mass of Na2 SiO3 Solution (kg/m3) 124.1 124.1 124.1

2.3 PREPARATION OF ALKALINE LIQUID:

For making sodium hydroxide solution, NaOH flakes were dissolved in tap water. Molarity of sodium
hydroxide was 16M.Therefore 640 grams of NaOH flakes was dissolved in one litre of tap water.
Sodium silicate gel is added to the solution to form complete mix. While casting the specimens, extra
water is added to the concrete mixture based on requirement.

2.4 MIXING & CASTING:

The aggregates and flyash were mixed together for 2-3 minutes. Dry mix was mixed with the prepared
alkaline activator and about another 4 - 5 minutes the wet mixing can be promoted as show in Figure-
1. Then the geopolymer concrete was poured into the moulds and was compacted. Then the top
surface is well finished.

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 729 editor@iaeme.com

 Ch. Hema Sindhusha and V. Ranga Rao

Figure1 Mixing of geopolymer concrete

Figure 2 Compressive & Split tensile strength Tests on Concrete Specimens

Figure 3 Flexural Strength Test on Concrete Specimens

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 730 editor@iaeme.com

 Study on Behavior of Alkali Activated Flyash based Geopolymer Concrete

2.5 CURING:
The moulds were demoulded after 24 hours. Up to 3, 7, 28 days the specimens were kept at ambient
temperature.

3. RESULTS& DISCUSSIONS
3.1 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
For cubes, Compressive test was done according to Indian standard specifications. Compressive
strength of various activator ratios for 3, 7, 28 days are shown in Figure-4. At all ages, higher
compressive strength has been observed for the 1:3 activator ratios as compared to other two activator
ratios. Compressive strength increases about 21-56 % with increase in curing period and 2-14 % with
increase in activator ratio.

Figure 4 Effect of activator ratio on Compressive strength

3.2 SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH

For cylinders split tensile test was done as per Indian specifications. Split tensile strength of various
activator ratios for 3, 7, 28 days are shown in Figure-5. At all ages, higher Split tensile strength has
been observed for the 1:3 activator ratios as compared to other two activator ratios. Split Tensile
strength increases about 42- 90 % with increase in curing period and 8-25 % with increase in activator
ratio.

Figure 5 Effect of activator ratio on Split Tensile strength

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 731 editor@iaeme.com

 Ch. Hema Sindhusha and V. Ranga Rao

3.3 FLEXURAL STRENGTH

For beams, flexural test is conducted as per Indian specifications. Split tensile strength of various
activator ratios for 3, 7, 28 days are shown in Figure-6. At all ages, higher Split tensile strength has
been observed for the 1:3 activator ratios as compared to other two activator ratios. Split Tensile
strength increases about 51-78 % with increase in curing period and 16-53 % with increase in activator
ratio.

Figure 6 Effect of activator ratio on Flexural strength

Table 2 Various Strength Parameters of Geopolymer Concrete

COMPRESSIVE SPLIT TENSILE FLEXURAL

STRENGTH STRENGTH STRENGTH
S. NO NO. OF DAYS (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2)

1:2 1:2.5 1:3 1:2 1:2.5 1:3 1:2 1:2.5 1:3

1 3 days 8.63 8.85 9.50 0.22 0.24 0.27 0 0.46 0.59

2 7 days 11.03 11.42 12.12 0.38 0.83 0.87 0.52 1.12 1.22

3 28 Days 18 20.5 21 2 2.4 2.7 1.76 2.12 2.3

4. CONCLUSIONS
From the experimental investigation following conclusions were drawn.
Compressive strength increases substantially with increase of an activator ratio and age.
The split tensile strength increases with increase of an activator ratio and curing period.
Flexural strength also increases about 51- 78% with increase in curing period and 16- 53% with
increase in activator ratio.
At all ages, the activator ratio 1:3 gives maximum strength and also economical when compared to
other two activator ratios.

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 732 editor@iaeme.com

 Study on Behavior of Alkali Activated Flyash based Geopolymer Concrete

5. REFERENCES
[1] ASTM. (2003f). Standard test method for electrical indication of concretes ability to resist
chloride ion penetration. C1202, West Conshohocken, PA.
[2] ASTM. (2003g). Standard test method for half-cell potentials of uncoated reinforcing steel in
concrete. C876, West Conshohocken, PA.
[3] Ahmari, S., Ren, X., Toufigh, V., and Zhang, L. (2012). Production of geopolymeric binder from
blended waste concrete powder and fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater, 35(10), 718729.
[4] Design and compressive strength of geopolymer concrete containing blended ash from agro-
industrial wastes. J. Adv. Mater. Res., 339,452457.
[5] Hardjito, D., and Rangan, B. V. (2005). Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based
geopolymer concrete, Curtin Univ. of Technology, Perth, Australia.
[6] Ammar Motorwala (2013). ALKALI Activated FLY-ASH Based Geopolymer Concrete, IJTAE,
Gujarat.
[7] Shankar H. Sanni (2012).Performance of geopolymer concrete under severe environmental
conditions, International journal of civil and structural engineering, Bagalkot.
[8] B. Vijaya Rangan(2009), Studies on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Curtin University, Perth,
Australia.
[9] N A Lloyd and B V Rangan, B. V. (2010). Geopolymer concrete with flyash. Curtin Univ. of
Technology, Perth, Australia.
[10] Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri1 (2011). Review on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete without Portland
cement, Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, Perlis, Malaysia
[11] Abdullah Anwar, Sabih Ahmad, Yusuf Jamal and M.Z. Khan, Assessment of Liquefaction Potential
of Soil Using Multi-Linear Regression Modeling, International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, 7(1), 2016, pp. 373-415.
[12] Akpila, S. B. and Omunguye, I. W. Derivative of Stress Strain, Deviatoric Stress and Undrained
Cohesion Models Based on Soil Modulus of Cohesive Soils. International Journal of Civil
Engineering and Technology, 6(7), 2015, pp 34-43.
[13] John Paul V. and Antony Rachel Sneha M., Effect of Random Inclusion of Bamboo Fibers on
Strength Behaviour of Flyash Treated Black Cotton Soil. International Journal of Civil Engineering
and Technology, 7(5), 2016, pp.153160.

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 733 editor@iaeme.com