Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
services, housing and health care. As the number of organization grows the
curiosity of the people awaken on where they get their sources of funds and how
they allocate it in different expenses, and activities. Just like other businesses
they depend on funds as their fuel to run the organization in their overall
or other activities serving the public interest or common good. It is often depend
partly on donations, fund raising and gifts. They are governed by the Board of
procedures to meet their legal duties to safeguard the charitys assets and to
the flow of funds that provides a mechanism on how the charitys performance in
allocating their funds on major activities. It comes from internal and external
2
reserves to satisfy its necessity for cash while Allocation is the assignment of
purposes only, and falls to be subject to the control of the High Court in the
exercise of its jurisdiction with respect to charitable organization like these. This
members, trustees ,or officers, and that any profit obtained as an incident of its
operations shall be used for the furtherance of the purpose/s for which the
control and handle their funds in different activities. They also want to determine
the right and effective ways on funding that can be used not only in this
institution in the First District of Rizal, the researchers can get an idea to the
common problem that has been encountered by the charitable institutions. The
researcher wants to determine the different sources of the charities funds. They
want to discern how these institutions allocate their resource funds and what the
Rizal wherein they will conduct a study. The respondents are those who are in
The researchers will be using a questionnaire. The study will help the charitable
leaders, current and potential founders and the communities that the charitable
organizational served. The researchers conducted this to found out the Sources
and Allocation of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year
2016. Through this study, it will help to know and understand the proper ways of
the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016. The researchers conducted this
funds of the Charitable Organizations in first district of Rizal and how these
profit organizations which has philanthropic goals and social well-being (e.g.
help the people within the organization. Just like other business enterprise they
4
also have a fund which is being allocated to support the different expenses and
In the First district of Rizal there are local and foreign found charitable
charitable organizations committed itself in protecting and using assets for their
nonprofit mission. Proper financial practices are very important in doing this,
since proper practices help to prevent and detect errors and fraud. Good financial
practices also assure the donors that their donation will be properly used.
Charitable organizations rely on funds they gain from internal and external
sources, Bob Collie, FIA (2012) stated that The success on nonprofit sector is
supported not only by donations and bequest, but also by investment designs to
protect and grow that asset. Gaining funds for charities will never stop its
activities, the charities must know the financial procedures on how they will
budget the funds they have. Proper allocation of these collected funds is
necessary for the sustainability of the charitable sector. Charitable institution that
sets their goal can attain their objective as well as use their funds in an efficient
maximize the wealth of the institution and also prudent allotment and spreading
social media to produce funds by fund raising it is one of their ways to provide
institution has their objectives and goals to be attained, but they cannot do this
financial life and security is to become better at making decision. When it comes
to your money, what you decide today can affect your finances for years to
come. Because handling an organization with a justified decision will help them
balance the benefits of greater accuracy with the costs involved when selecting
make proper methods on how they will achieve their objectives. Example, the
other measure. In other words, funds should be obtained at the least cost of
capital with the least burden on the charities assets. Proper allocation should be
practice to ensure enough funds which can satisfy its upcoming operations and
expenses.
effectiveness may face serious consequences if the nonprofit does not spend
Inadequate spending will result to some risk that the charitable institution
might be encountered. It is truly important that the organization must have their
proper ways and procedures in allotting some financial funds in order to have a
Theoretical Framework
The study was anchored on the concept of Lamberto (2010) that the
of activities, which greatly affect the use and sources of funds. It has to do with
engaging, and control of activities, it means that every charity must equalize the
funds they receive or gain from the range of their expenditure and spending.
Dowell, Myron (2006), public charities have some restricted revenue options,
being donations, profit making strategies and government funding the main ones.
Apparently referring to the same, Hodge and Piccolo (2005) divide funding
corporate gifts and foundation grants; public support in the form of government
grants; and private sector payments or commercial activity such as user fees,
This study above is related to our study because it explains the different sources
of funding the charities. Charities can generate funds to suffice their needs
Conceptual Framework
Age
Sex
Civil Status
Educational
Attainment
Position
Length of Service
Internal Sources
-Contribution
-Generating Income
External Sources
- Trading
- Solicitation
-Gifts/Donations
- Revenue options
- Loan financing
- Voluntary Payroll
giving
- Sponsors
F
Feedback
Paradigm of the Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the
The first frame shows the Input, which indicated the profile of the
respondents in terms of age, sex, civil status and educational attainment. It also
includes the profile of the organization and the perception of the respondent on
The second frame shows the Process, which indicated the formulation of
Collected.
The third frame shows the Output, which indicated the determined
The feedback represents the three frames that are interrelated with one
another.
It implied that Input was used for the Process and gathering Data in order
1.1 Ages;
1.2 Sex;
1.5 Position;
2.1.3 Health
2.1.4 Religion
2.1.5 Others
3.1.1 Contribution
3.2.1 Trading
3.2.2 Solicitation
3.2.7 Sponsors
. Allocation of Funds
4.2 Allowance
4.4 Equipment
4.5 Supplies
4.6 Salary/Wages
Hypothesis
and allocation of funds when grouped according to the personal profile of the
respondents?
2. There is no significant difference on the respondents perception on the sources
organization?
This study will focus on determining the Sources and Allocation of Funds
of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2015. The
target respondents for this are 40 or the 100 percent of the charitable institutions
consisting of ten (10) charities in the First District of Rizal. There are five (5)
charities in Taytay, Rizal, namely the Destinys Promise Home for Children
Uflift Community, Devt. Found. Inc., Sister of St. Paul Chartres Vigil House. One
(1) charity in Angono, Rizal the Aveemar Homes Don Mariano Santos Ave.,
Senior Citizens Associations. Three (3) charities in Cainta, Rizal the Ang Arko ng
Ministries Inc., and one (1) charitable institution in Binangonan, Rizal the Blue
The variables utilized are as follows; age, sex, civil status, educational
The researchers believed that the result of the study would benefit the
following contributions:
Government. This study will help the government to know about the
the community.
Students. This study will be reference material to them on making a
Definition of Terms
differs from other types of NPOs in that it centers on non-profit and philanthropic
charities.
Volunteers. Refers to a person who voluntarily offers himself or herself for
organization.
Solicitation. It refers requesting for something, usually money, to have an
services or any other thing that will be useful and helpful in the organization or in
borrowed from the bank or any financial institution to sustain their expenses.
Voluntary payroll giving. It is an agreement between government or
organization.
Contribution. This refers to the payment of the members to gain funds.
age group, pre-school to graduate school and beyond. Some serve as the
effective.
Health Charity. This type of organization covers everything from
supporting and treating sick and disabled, working on cures for deceases, and
CHAPTER 2
the development of the study. The chapter was deal with the method of research,
setting of the study, source of the study, procedure of the study and the statistical
treatment.
Research Method
research refers to the type of research question, design, and data analysis that
will applied to a given topic. This method involves the analysis and interpretation
designed for the investigator to gather information about the present conditions,
18
status, trend and dealing with what are prevailing are generally descriptive
research. The main objective of the study is to describe the nature of the
situation as it exists at the time of the study, and to explore the causes of a
why is so. One can only describe what is prevailing, and develop inferences,
but cannot explain the why of the dynamics of the variables; otherwise, there is
The study will use descriptive method research because the researchers
believe that this is the most appropriate method to use. The necessary data
determine the answer on the statement of the problem to test the hypothesis.
Index, Taytay ranked 3rd Most Competitiveness Municipality in 2015 from being
10th place in 2014. In this municipality we have five (5) different charitable
19
rescued children that have been rescued from on the other side of the river,
abusive homes, malnourishment and life on the street. Sisters of St. Paul of
Chartres Vigil House Inc. is a religious congregation for teaching, nursing, visiting
the poor and taking care of orphans, the old and infirm and mentally ill. Munting
Tinig @ Munting Pangarap Inc., this charity helps children to send in school. Uflift
Community Devt Foundation is an institution for the aged. The Little Children
30 kilometers (19 mi) east of Manila. In this municipality we have the Aveemar
Homes Don Mariano Santos Ave. (DOMSA) Senior Citizen Associations they
organized activities for the senior citizen in their place to give happiness and
enjoyment.
into a city. Its income of Php 1,251,517,325.79 makes it the richest municipality in
the country. In this municipality we have two (2) charitable institutions; the Help
International Ministries Inc.is reaching out and helping the needy in the
province of Rizal, Philippines. Thriving fish port and fishing industry is found in
20
Binangonan, having a long coast line facing the Laguna de Bay, including the
western part of Talim Island. We have one (1) charity the Blue Whale Mission of
administrator and agency head of the charitable institution in the first district of
Rizal which is composed of Taytay, Cainta, Angono and Binangonan. They are
the persons concern in the sources and allocation of funds of their organization.
answer the questions and to provide them necessary information that will help
the study.
district of Rizal. Those are the charities: (1) Ang Arko ng Pilipinas Inc., (2)
Destinys Promise Home for Children Found. Inc., (3) Help International
Ministries Inc., (4) Blue Whale Mission of Our Lady Inc., (5) Sisters of St. Paul of
Chartres Vigil House Inc., (6) Uflift Community Devt., Foundation Inc., (7)
Association Inc., (8) Munting Tinig @ Munting Pangarap Inc., (9) Nagkakaisang
Senior Citizen ng Anak ng Pawis Inc., (10) The Little Children Home.
21
Sources of Data
in gathering the data needed and they used split half method. The questionnaire
is divided into three parts. The first part deals with the respondents profile, which
contains age, sex, civil status, educational attainment, position, and length of
service; the second parts is the organizations profile which contains types of
and the third parts is the respondents perception on the Sources and Allocation
2015.The researchers conducted their pretest and posttest in the second district
of Rizal.
Research Procedure
The study was conducted in the First District of Rizal. This study formally
started with the creation and formulation of the title according to the agreement of
the researchers. After formulating the appropriate title and having the approval of
the defense panel, the researchers started to formulate Chapter 1 and 2, they
gathered information in books and internet that is relevant to their study. One
month after the preparation of the papers the proposal defense follows which the
researchers proposing their study to the panelist. After the proposal, the
researchers conducted the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. After they
different statistical tools were retrieved in the questionnaire. The researchers look
from other approved thesis to serve as a guide as they start doing Chapter 3 and
and interpreting the data. Then the Chapter 4 follows, the summary of findings
And finally, the researchers defend their thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of
Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
Statistical Treatment
1. To determine the profile of the respondents and the organization, the researcher
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal. The researchers will use the
weighted mean.
5 4.20-5.00 Always
4 3.40-4.19 Often
3 2.60-3.39 Sometimes
2 1.80-2.59 Seldom
1 1.00-1.79 Never
23
used.
Chapter 3
24
presentation, analysis and interpretation. The data obtained from the responses
Table 1
in terms of Age
The data shows that the respondents who are in the age bracket of 41-50
years old are with the highest frequency of 8 or 26.7 percent followed by 20-30
and in the bracket of 31-40 years old with the frequency of 6 or 20.0 percent;
next is the bracket of 51-60 years old with the frequency of 5 or 16.7 percent. A
frequency of 4 or 13.3 are 61-70 years old respondents while the least number of
institutions in the first district of Rizal is in the age of 41-50 years old, which
means that the most of the respondents were matured enough in handling and
because their level of involvement in organizational activities yet age varies from
study to study.
Table 2
26
in terms of Sex
The above data reveals that 19 or 63.3 percent of the respondent are
This implies that most of the respondents are female which means that
spirited than men, volunteering more and giving a larger share of their income to
nonprofits.
Table 3
27
respondents are single, 10 or 33.3 percent are married and 1 or 3.3 percent are
widowed.
majorities of the respondents are single and assume greater responsibility. Some
men and women have some tendencies as well as married. However, in the first
district of Rizal happens that most of respondents are single. According to Yavas
and Riecken (2002), singles are more likely to be donors than those who are
married.
Table 4
28
of Educational Attainment
The data reveals that 27 or 90.0 percent of the respondents are College
Masteral Degree.
Table 5
in terms of Position
The table shows that 15 out of 30 or 50.0 percent of the respondents are
belong to other position: Staff, Social Worker, Board Members and Treasurer,
13.3 percent are Director, then followed by the frequency of 3 or 10.0 percent
were President or the CEO and 2 or 6.7 percent were Agency Head and 1 or 3.3
This implies that many of the respondents are Staff, Social Worker, Board
District of Rizal have many officers that who will handle and circulate the financial
Board Member and Treasurer are the most likely to make spending decisions.
30
Table 6
The table reveals that 10 out of 30 or 33.3 percent of the respondents are
below 3 years in their position, 8 or 26.7 percent are 8.01-13 years in their
position, 7 or 23.3 percent are 3.01-8 years in their position, 4 or 13.3 percent are
13.01-18 years in their position and least number have frequency of 1 or 3.3
charitable institution and have an experience for about 3 year and below in their
present position.
average length of service for the top executive were three years it can be
31
assumed that the respondents were just new in their job because of turnover of
the positions.
Table 7
The table above shows that 5 or 50.0 percent of the respondents are
Human and Services Charity and lastly 1 or 10.0 percent are categorized both in
The result shows that most of the charitable institutions are doing charity
works for the Social Welfare, residential, association and elderly homes, because
most of the charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal are focused on
organizations in the cities with large Filipino population is growing rapidly, they
offer variety of services for the local Filipino population including lunch programs,
social activities, senior activities and programs for the out of school youth.
Table 8
of Existence of Organization
It indicates that 7 or 70.0 percent of the respondents are serving for below
8 years and below while 3 or 30.0 percent have been in service from 9-13 years
already.
This implies that some of the charitable institutions in the first district of
Rizal have been existed for 8 years and below. It means that most of the
respondents are new in the field of managing charities. According to Zini (2008),
Table 9
Number of
Beneficiaries in Frequency Percentage Rank
the Organization
Below 10 3 30.0 2
11-20 3 30.0 2
21-30 1 10.0 4
41 above 3 30.0 2
Total 10 100.0
34
beneficiaries and below 10, some are 11-20 beneficiaries and some institutions
have 41 and above beneficiaries while 1 or 10.0 percent had 21-30 beneficiaries.
This implies that most of the respondents in the first district of Rizal had
beneficiaries of below 10, while others had an 11-20 and 41 and above
beneficiaries. It means that charities here in the first district of Rizal have a small
in the organization.
Table 10
Number of
Volunteers in the Frequency Percentage Rank
Organization
Below 4 1 10.0 3
5-9 6 60.0 1
25 above 3 30.0 2
Total 10 100.0
The data reveals that 6 or 60.0 percent of the respondents had a volunteer
of 5-9 persons followed by the frequency of 3 or 30.0 percent that have 25 and
above volunteers and 1 or 10.0 percent of the respondents had a 4 and below
volunteers.
to increase program spending, especially in the short run, since doing so may
require the charity to hire additional staff, such as economist advice nonprofit
managers to think at the margin and make socially optimal choices when making
Table 11
2.38.
37
sustain the activities of the organization obtained the highest mean of 3.20 with
training fees from the trainee has a mean of 2.36 rank second with the verbal
never.
sources.
Table 12
2.16.
2 which is Solicitation has a mean of 2.76 rank second with the verbal
rank is item number 1 which is Trading has a mean of 1.91 with a verbal
Sixth rank is item number 6 which is Voluntary payroll giving has a mean of
1.73 with a verbal interpretation of never. Last in the rank is item number 5
39
which is Make loan financing to invest in the organization has a mean of 1.23
those avenues and sources that are outside the jurisdiction of a given
could come in the trading, solicitation, gifts and donations and sponsors.
Table 13
3.80.
the highest mean of 4.54 with a verbal interpretation of always. In item number
5 which is Supplies has a mean of 4.33 rank second with the verbal
wages has a mean of 4.18 with a verbal interpretation of always. Fourth rank is
mean of 3.20 with a verbal interpretation of sometimes. Last in the rank is item
interpretation of seldom.
The scope and size of a not for profit's organization programs and asset
base dictate the complexity of its funds. According to Blackhaud (2011), The
budget once adopted should be used by the staff as a management tool to gauge
Table 14
The data included that the first rank is the Allocation of funds with a
grand mean of 3.80 and verbally interpreted as often. Second in the rank is the
seldom and lastly is the External Sources with a grand mean of 2.15 and
This implies that the respondents agreed that the most dependable factor
Allocation of funds. They see to it that it is the most important factor because it is
a day to day or daily monitoring of their funds and they can be able to manage
and control their funds in a proper and effective way. They can also diversify the
Table 15
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of .901 and
has a significance of .497. Since the significance is greater than the level of .05
the null hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. Second was
External Sources that has computed an F-value of 2.399 and has a significance
of .067, since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis
was accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of
Funds that has computed an F-value of .465 and has a significance of .798,
since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
because their level of involvement in organizational activities yet age varies from
study to study.
Table 16
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of 5.946 and
has a significance of .021. Since the significance is less than the level of .05 the
null hypothesis was rejected and interpreted as significant. Second was External
Sources that has computed an F-value of 6.209 and has a significance of .019,
since the significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
rejected and interpreted as significant. And lastly the Allocation of Funds that has
significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was accepted and
According to Leroux and Sneed women are even more likely to hold
Table 17
22.93
8
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of 6.533 and
has a significance of .005. Since the significance is less than the level of .05 the
null hypothesis was rejected and interpreted as significant. Second was External
Sources that has computed an F-value of 1.954 and has a significance of .161,
since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of Funds that
has computed an F-value of 11.714 and has a significance of .000, since the
significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was rejected and
interpreted as significant.
(2001), Finds that both married men and women are more likely to give than
single man but only married man (and not married men) give higher amounts
than single men. However in the first district of Rizal the most respondents are
single.
attainment.
Table 18
and has a significance of .456. Since the significance is greater than the level of .
05 the null hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. Second
48
was External Sources that has computed an F-value of 2.169 and has a
significance of .134, since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null
hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the
Allocation of Funds that has computed an F-value of .054 and has a significance
of .054, since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis
Table 19
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of .657 and
has a significance of .659. Since the significance is greater than the level of .05
the null hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. Second was
External Sources that has computed an F-value of 2.038 and has a significance
of .109, since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis
was accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of
Funds that has computed an F-value of 2.378 and has a significance of .060,
since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
Directors and Administrator they are the one who managed financial allocation in
the organization.
position.
Table 20
7
Allocation Between Groups 16.71 4 4.17 16.79 .000 R S
of Funds Within Groups 6 25 9 0
Total 6.222 29 .249
22.93
8
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of .764 and
has a significance of .559. Since the significance is greater than the level of .05
the null hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. Second was
External Sources that has computed an F-value of 1.621 and has a significance
of .200, since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis
was accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of
Funds that has computed an F-value of 16.790 and has a significance of .000,
since the significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
the mission driven of their work, study have shown that employees who are
organization.
Table 21
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of 7.225 and
has a significance of .028. Since the significance is less than the level of .05 the
null hypothesis was rejected and interpreted as significant. Second was External
53
Sources that has computed an F-value of 1.978 and has a significance of .197,
since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of Funds that
has computed an F-value of .045 and has a significance of .837, since the
significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was accepted and
Table 22
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of 4.052 and
has a significance of .068. Since the significance is greater than the level of .05
the null hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. Second was
External Sources that has computed an F-value of 4.015 and has a significance
of .070, since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis
was accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of
Funds that has computed an F-value of 4.624 and has a significance of .053,
since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
in the organization.
Table 23
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of 4.113 and
has a significance of .066. Since the significance is greater than the level of .05
the null hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. Second was
External Sources that has computed an F-value of 5.032 and has a significance
of .044, since the significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis
was rejected and interpreted as significant. And lastly the Allocation of Funds that
has computed an F-value of 8.084 and has a significance of .015, since the
56
significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was rejected and
interpreted as significant.
that might be paid within other sectors. And it almost goes without saying that
Chapter 4
Summary of Findings
1. The Profile of the Respondents in terms of age, sex, civil status, educational
1.1 In Terms of Age. It was gleaned that 8 out of 30 or 26.7 percent of the
respondents aged 41-50; 6 or 20.0 percent were 20-30 years old and also 31-40
years old; 5 or 16.7 percent aged 51-60 years old; 4 or 13.3 percent aged 61-70
percent of the respondents were single; 10 or 33.3 percent were married and 1 or
90.0 percent of the respondents were College Graduates; 2 or 6.7 percent were
respondents are belong to other position: Staff, Social Worker, Board Members
Director; 3 or 10.0 percent were President or the CEO; 2 or 6.7 percent were
33.3 percent of the respondents have been operating in the charitable institutions
for 3 years and below now; 8 or 26.7 percent have been in the organization from
8.01-13 years already; 7 or 23.3 percent have been in 3.01-8 years; 4 or 13.3
percent have been operating in 13.01-18 years and only 1 or 3.3 percent among
them have been operating in charitable organization for 18.01 years and above.
the staff, social worker, board members and treasurer; 3 or 30.0 percent were in
59
Human and Services Charity; 1 or 10.0 percent were belong to Education and
Religion charity and 0 (zero) percent were categorized for the Health charity.
from the table that out of 10 charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal, 7 or
70.0 percent have just been servicing charities for 8 years and below while 3 or
beneficiaries below 10, some are 11-20 beneficiaries and some institutions have
contribution to sustain the activities in the organization ranked first with a mean
Receiving training fees from the trainee with a mean of 2.3667 and a verbal
3.2 In Terms of External Sources.It can be noted from the table that
verbal interpretation of Sometimes; third in the rank was Gifts and Donations
verbally interpreted Seldom while Voluntary payroll giving ranked sixth with a
mean of 1.7333 and is verbally interpreted Never while ranking last was
Never.
4.1 In Terms of Allocation of Funds. It can be noted from the table that
General Expense ranked first with a mean of 4.5417 and a verbal interpretation
of Always while Supplies ranked second with a mean of 4.3333 and is verbally
Often; ranking fifth was Allowance with a mean of 3.2083 and a verbal
interpretation of Sometimes while ranking last was Rent Expense with a mean
service,
61
5.1 In Terms of Age. It can be observed that the sig. of .497, .067, and .
798 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, do not reject the null
5.2 In Terms of Sex. It can be noted from the table that the sig. of .021 and
.019 are less than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, reject the null hypothesis
Rizal in terms of Sex. Meanwhile, do not reject the null hypothesis on Budgeting
of funds for its sig. of .241 is greater than 0.05 level of significance
5.3 In Terms of Civil Status. . It can be seen from the table that the sig. of
0.005 and 0.000 are less than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, reject the null
First District of Rizal in terms of Civil Status. Meanwhile, do not reject the null
hypothesis on External Sources for its sig. of .161 is greater than 0.05 level of
significance.
that the sig. of .456 .134 and .054 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance.
Hence, do not reject the null hypothesis stating that there is significant difference
5.5 In Terms of Position. It can be observed from the table that the sig. of .
456 .134 and .054 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, do not
reject the null hypothesis stating that there is significant difference on the
5.6 In terms of Length of Service. It can be observed from the table that
the sig. of .559 and .200 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, do
not reject the null hypothesis stating that there is significant difference on the
Meanwhile, reject the null hypothesis on the Budgeting of funds for its sig. of .000
on the Sources and Allocation of Funds in the First District of Rizal in terms of
from the table that the sig. of .197 and .837 are greater than 0.05 level of
significance. Hence, do not reject the null hypothesis stating that there is
Sources for its sig. .028 is less than 0.05 level of significance.
63
that the sig. of .068, .070 and .053 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance.
Hence, do not reject the null hypothesis stating that there is significant difference
that the sig. of .044 and .015 are less than 0.05 level of significance. Hence,
reject the null hypothesis stating that there is no significant difference on the
allocation of funds for its sig. .044 and .015 are less than 0.05 level of
significance.
Conclusions
terms of sex and civil status on the Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable
the organization.
enough and capable to manage the financial dealings properly. Majority of the
64
were college graduate. Most of them are Staff, Social worker, Board members
and Treasurer. The majority in the length of service in present position, they had
been in charitable organizations for below 3 years and had been new in the
organization.
for the Social Servicing, Residential, Association and Elderly Homes and have
been operating for 8 years and below they are newly in the work of helping
others, and they vary when it comes to their beneficiaries some have the small
number and other have large number of beneficiaries, mostly have a 5-9 number
volunteers.
the sources and allocation of funds of charitable institutions in the first district of
Recommendation
following recommendations.
65
prioritizing in raising funds and build more recreational conferences, they must
that they will collect some funds that will help to support their needs inside the
organization.
must also promote their organization to encourage more sponsors that will help
institution to sustain the needs of their charity and to satisfy the needs of the
beneficiaries.
will be able to allocate their funds to different expenses and activities in order to
BIBLIOGRAPHY
UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
66
Bonniwell, Matt, Economic Senior Thesis The United Ways Effect on Donor
University of Puget
Organizations
Efficiency
How?
Mathew Hill (April 2012) The Relationship between volunteering and charitable
giving
APPENDIX A
GANTT CHART
68
Activities Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
1.Title Formulation
2.Title Defense
3.Constructing a
problem and its
background and
methodology of
research
4.Proposal Defense
14.Revision(finalization
)
APPENDIX B
69
February 2016
Instructor of URSB
Dear Madame;
Appendix C
70
February 2016
Instructor of URSB
Dear Madame;
APPENDIX D
71
February 2016
SIR.HENRICO CEIDOZA
Instructor of URSB
Dear Madame;
Appendix E
72
February 2016
Instructor of URSB
Dear Madame;
Appendix F
73
LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE
Joanne S. Concepcion
Dear Madame;
I have honor to inform your good office that I have accepted the appointment as
the thesis adviser of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae Tabirao, and Maricar
Villanueva whose thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
Thesis Adviser
Appendix G
74
LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE
Joanne S. Concepcion
Dear Madame;
I have honor to inform your good office that I have accepted the appointment as
the thesis adviser of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae Tabirao, and Maricar
Villanueva whose thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
Thank you very much!
Appendix H
75
LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE
Joanne S. Concepcion
Dear Madame;
I have honor to inform your good office that I have accepted the appointment as
the thesis adviser of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae Tabirao, and Maricar
Villanueva whose thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
English Critic
Appendix I
76
LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE
Joanne S. Concepcion
Dear Madame;
I have honor to inform your good office that I have accepted the appointment as
the thesis adviser of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae Tabirao, and Maricar
Villanueva whose thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
Thesis Chairman
Appendix J
77
January 2016
Dear Respondents
We third year students of the University of the Rizal System, enrolled in Bachelor
of Science in Business Administration for the year 2015-2016, conducting a
thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institution in
the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
The undersigned humbly solicit your cooperation by the answering honestly the
accurately the attached questionnaire.
If there are queries regarding the questionnaire, the undersigned are willing to
explain and be your guest at any time you will specify.
Thank you very much, and we trust on your kind consideration with our humble
request.
Noted by:
MS. EDEN SANTOS
Thesis Adviser
Appendix K
QUESTIONNAIRE CHECKLIST
78
Directions: Please check the space that corresponds to your answer or write the space provided
to signify your answer.
( ) 30-40 ( ) Director
( ) 40-50 ( ) Supervisor
( ) 50-60 ( ) Administrator
( ) 60-70 ( ) Agency Head
( ) 70-80 ( ) Others, specify ________
( ) Others, specify ______
B. Sex F. Length of service: _____________
( ) Male
( ) Female II. Profile of the Organization
Types of Organization
C. Civil Status ( ) Education Charity
( ) Single ( ) Human and Services
( ) Married ( ) Health
( ) Widowed ( ) Religion
( ) Others, specify __________
D. Educational Background
( ) Elementary Graduate Years of Existence: ______________
( ) High School Graduate No. of Beneficiaries: ______________
( ) College Graduate No. of Volunteers: ________________
( ) Others, please specify _____
Scale Interpretation
5 Always
4 Often
3 Sometimes
2 Seldom
1 Never
Internal Sources 5 4 3 2 1
79
External Sources 5 4 3 2 1
1. 1. Trading
1.1 Selling products by the beneficiaries of the
organization.
1.2 Selling charity cards.
2. 2. Solicitation
2.1 Accept funds from private individual.
2.2 Accept funds from private foundation.
3. 3. Gifts and Donations
3.1 Direct giving from individuals.
3.2 Bequest.
4. Raising of Funds/Revenue Options
4.1 Make raffles tickets to generate income.
4.2Sponsorsspecial events (like concert for a cause).
5. Make Loan financing to invest in the organization.
6. Voluntary Payroll giving
7. 7. Sponsors
7.1 Accept funds/gifts from corporate Foundation.
7.2 Accept funds/gifts from community Groups.
Allocation of Funds 5 4 3 2 1
1. General Expense
1.1 Pay electricity bills monthly.
1.2 Pay water bills monthly.
1.3 Pay telephone bills monthly.
1.4 Pay internet bills monthly.
2. Allowance
2.1 Provides allowance for beneficiaries stay in.
2.2 Provides allowance for beneficiaries stay out.
2.3 Provides volunteer allowances stay in.
2.4 Provides volunteer allowances stay out.
3. Rent Expense
3.1 Pay for the rent in case of no owned property
(Land, building, etc.).
80
4. Equipment
4.1 Payment for the maintenance of facilities.
4.2 Payment for the maintenance of equipment.
4.3 Payment for the gasoline expenses.
5. Supplies
5.1 Purchase food for the beneficiaries.
5.2 Purchase medicine for the beneficiaries
5.3 Purchase hygiene materials like diapers, soap, etc.,
used by the beneficiaries.
6. Salary/Wages
6.1 Pay salary for the workers or staff of the
organization.
6.2 Pay salary for the caregiver of the organization.
6.3 Pay salary for the maintenance worker of the
organization.
Appendix M
UNIVERSITY STATISTICAL CENTER RESULT
Frequency Table
Age
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 20-30 6 19.4 20.0 20.0
31-40 6 19.4 20.0 40.0
41-50 8 25.8 26.7 66.7
81
Sex
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Male 11 35.5 36.7 36.7
Female 19 61.3 63.3 100.0
Total 30 96.8 100.0
Missing 1 3.2
System
Total 31 100.0
CS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Single 63.3 63.3
19 61.3
Married 33.3 96.7
10 32.3
Widowed 3.3 100.0
1 3.2
Total 100.0
30 96.8
Missing System
1 3.2
Total
31 100.0
EA
82
Position
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid President/CEO 3 9.7 10.0 10.0
Director 4 12.9 13.3 23.3
Supervisor 1 3.2 3.3 26.7
Administrator 5 16.1 16.7 43.3
Agency Head 2 6.5 6.7 50.0
Others (Staff, Social
Worker, Board 15 48.4 50.0 100.0
Members and
Treasurer)
Total 30 96.8 100.0
Missing System 1 3.2
Total 31 100.0
LOS (Binned)
83
TEducation
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 1 3.3 10.0 10.0
No 9 30.0 90.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Missing System 20 66.7
Total 30 100.0
THuman
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 3 10.0 30.0 30.0
No 7 23.3 70.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
84
THealth
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid No 10 33.3 100.0 100.0
Missing System 20 66.7
Total 30 100.0
TReligion
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 1 3.3 10.0 10.0
No 9 30.0 90.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Missing System 20 66.7
Total 30 100.0
TOthers
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 5 16.7 50.0 50.0
No 5 16.7 50.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Missing System 20 66.7
Total 30 100.0
YOE (Binned)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
85
NOB (Binned)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 10 3 10.0 30.0 30.0
below
11-20 3 10.0 30.0 60.0
21-30 1 3.3 10.0 70.0
41 3 10.0 30.0 100.0
above
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Missing 20 66.7
System
Total 30 100.0
NOV (Binned)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 4 1 3.3 10.0 10.0
below
5-9 6 20.0 60.0 70.0
25 13 10.0 30.0 100.0
above
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Missing 20 66.7
System
Total 30 100.0
86
Descriptive Statistics
Internal Sources N Mean Std. Deviation
A1 30 3.2000 1.62735
A2 30 2.2000 1.15669
A3 30 2.3667 1.42595
A4 30 1.7667 1.43078
A 30 2.3833 .93018
Valid N (listwise) 30
Descriptive Statistics
Allocation of Funds N Mean Std. Deviation
C1.1 30 4.7000 .91539
C1.2 30 4.7000 .91539
C1.3 30 4.5333 1.25212
C1.4 30 4.2333 1.56873
C1 30 4.5417 1.08295
C2.2 30 3.3333 1.86313
C2.2 30 3.2667 1.83704
C2.3 30 3.0667 1.83704
C2.4 30 3.1667 1.89525
C2 30 3.2083 1.47695
C3 30 2.5333 1.75643
C4.1 30 3.9333 1.43679
C4.2 30 4.1333 1.25212
C4.3 30 3.9667 1.40156
C4 30 4.0111 1.13692
C5.1 30 4.5000 .93772
C5.2 30 4.2667 1.25672
C5.3 30 4.2333 1.43078
C5 30 4.3333 1.17444
C6.1 30 4.2333 1.56873
C6.2 30 4.2000 1.62735
C6.3 30 4.1333 1.63440
C6 30 4.1889 1.59905
C 30 3.8028 .88937
Valid N (listwise) 30
88
ONEWAY
A B C BY AGE
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 3.965 5 .793 .901 .497
Within Groups 21.127 24 .880
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 4.554 5 .911 2.399 .067
Within Groups 9.113 24 .380
Total 13.667 29
C Between Groups 2.028 5 .406 .465 .798
Within Groups 20.911 24 .871
Total 22.938 29
ONEWAY
A B C BY SEX
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 4.395 1 4.395 5.946 .021
Within Groups 20.697 28 .739
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 2.481 1 2.481 6.209 .019
Within Groups 11.187 28 .400
Total 13.667 29
C Between Groups 1.116 1 1.116 1.433 .241
Within Groups 21.822 28 .779
Total 22.938 29
89
ONEWAY
A B C BY CS
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 8.182 2 4.091 6.533 .005
Within Groups 16.909 27 .626
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 1.728 2 .864 1.954 .161
Within Groups 11.939 27 .442
Total 13.667 29
C Between Groups 10.657 2 5.328 11.714 .000
Within Groups 12.282 27 .455
Total 22.938 29
ONEWAY
A B C BY EA
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 1.417 2 .708 .808 .456
Within Groups 23.675 27 .877
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 1.892 2 .946 2.16 .134
Within Groups 11.776 27 .436 9
Total 13.667 29
90
ONEWAY
A B C BY POSITION
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 3.022 5 .604 .657 .659
Within Groups 22.070 24 .920
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 4.074 5 .815 2.03 .109
Within Groups 9.593 24 .400 8
Total 13.667 29
C Between Groups 7.599 5 1.520 2.37 .060
Within Groups 15.340 24 .639 8
Total 22.938 29
ONEWAY
A B C BY loszz
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 2.733 4 .683 .764 .559
Within Groups 22.359 25 .894
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 2.815 4 .704 1.621 .200
Within Groups 10.853 25 .434
Total 13.667 29
91
ONEWAY
A B C BY YOEZ
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 1.376 1 1.376 7.22 .028
Within Groups 1.524 8 .190 5
Total 2.900 9
B Between Groups .868 1 .868 1.97 .197
Within Groups 3.510 8 .439 8
Total 4.378 9
C Between Groups .072 1 .072 .045 .837
Within Groups 12.803 8 1.600
Total 12.875 9
ONEWAY
A B C BY NOBZ
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Squares F Sig.
A Between Groups 1.942 3 .647 4.05 .068
Within Groups .958 6 .160 2
Total 2.900 9
B Between Groups 2.922 3 .974 4.01 .070
Within Groups 1.456 6 .243 5
92
Total 4.378 9
C Between Groups 8.987 3 2.996 4.62 .053
Within Groups 3.888 6 .648 4
Total 12.875 9
ONEWAY
A B C BY NOVZ
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 1.567 2 .783 4.113 .066
Within Groups 1.333 7 .190
Total 2.900 9
B Between Groups 2.582 2 1.291 5.03 .044
Within Groups 1.796 7 .257 2
Total 4.378 9
C Between Groups 8.985 2 4.492 8.08 .015
Within Groups 3.890 7 .556 4
Total 12.875 9
93
APPENDIX Q
APPENDIX R
CURRICULUM VITAE
Micah C. Enlangan
Blk.56 Damayan Brgy. San Juan Taytay, Rizal
96
micah.enlangan08@yahoo.com
Personal Background
Date of Birth: November 8, 1995
Place of Birth: Quirino Memorial Hospital
Age: 20
Civil Status: Single
Height: 50
Religion: Seventh Day Adventist
Parents: Narciso E. Enlangan
Merly C. Enlangan
Educational Background
Organization/Affiliation
Member: College of Business (COB)
Junior Financial Executives (JFINEX)
Junior Confederation on Finance Association
(JCFAP)
CURRICULUM VITAE
Maricar O. Villanueva
Sitio Karuhatan Hulong Bangiad Brgy. San Juan Taytay,Rizal
97
mhiemaricar@gmail.com
________________________________________________________________
Personal Background
Date of Birth: November 12, 1996
Place of Birth: Pasig City
Age: 19
Civil Status: Single
Height: 51
Religion: Roman Catholic
Parents: Eddie B. Villanueva
Nila O. Villanueva
Educational Background
Tertiary: University of Rizal System Binangonan, Rizal
(2013-Present)
Course: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
Major: Financial Management
Secondary: Taytay National High School
(2009-2013)
Primary: De Castro Elementary School
(2003-2009)
Organization/Affiliation
Member: College of Business (COB)
Junior Financial Executives (JFINEX)
Junior Confederation on Finance Association
(JCFAP)
CURRICULUM VITAE
Shiela Mae D. Tabirao
Blk. 36 Lot 23 Sitio Simona Subd. Brgy. San Isidro Taytay, Rizal
98
shielatabirao@ymail.com
_______________________________________________________________
Personal Background
Date of Birth: May 3, 1997
Place of Birth: Taytay, Rizal
Age: 19
Civil Status: Single
Height: 52
Religion: Roman Catholic
Parents: Jose T. Tabirao
Gemma D. Tabirao
Educational Background
Tertiary: University of Rizal System Binangonan, Rizal
(2013-Present)
Course: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
Major: Financial Management
Secondary: Francisco P. Felix Memorial Natl High School
(2009-2013)
Primary: Sitio Simona Elementary School
(2003-2009)
Organization/Affiliation
Member: College of Business (COB)
Junior Financial Executives (JFINEX)
Junior Confederation on Finance Association
(JCFAP)