DECEMBER 14, 2016

61 BOBCAT

DE ANDRE DUGAN
STUDENT ID: A04187464
 1) Chi Square

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

RACENEW *
61 100.0% 0 0.0% 61 100.0%
PRES

RACENEW * PRES Crosstabulation

PRES

Clinton Trump Other Total

RACENEW White Count 11 11 7 29

% within PRES 33.3% 91.7% 43.8% 47.5%
Minorities Count 22 1 9 32
% within PRES 66.7% 8.3% 56.3% 52.5%

Total Count 33 12 16 61
% within PRES 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 12.132a 2 .002

Likelihood Ratio 13.592 2 .001

Linear-by-Linear
1.485 1 .223
Association

N of Valid Cases 61

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 5.70.

H0: There is no significant relationship between race and presidential elect.

According to this Cross tab you can notice that like the election in November majority of

minorities selected Clinton 66.7 percent versus 8.3 percent who voted for Trump. Also, just like

the election more Whites voted for Trump 91.7 percent versus 33.3 percent who voted Clinton.

In addition, looking at Pearson Chi-Square of .002 we would reject the null and state that there is

a significant difference between race and presidential elect. This is because .002 is smaller than

the significant p value of .05.

2.) Single Sample t test

One-Sample Statistics

Std. Std. Error

N Mean Deviation Mean

work hours, average

61 16.41 13.791 1.766
weekly

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 20

95% Confidence Interval of

Sig. (2- Mean the Difference

t df tailed) Difference Lower Upper

work hours, average

-2.033 60 .046 -3.590 -7.12 -.06
weekly

Research hypothesis: In my ideal world I believe that college students should work a minimal of

20 hours per week, because I believe it helps prepare them for the work world, builds character,

and helps with networking. To test my ideal world, I am using the non-random sample we

gathered from sixty-one Texas State students.

Null H0: There is no difference in the average work hours worked weekly and the 20 hours per

week test value.

Results: With a p value of .046 I reject the null and assert that there is a significant difference at

the .05 level between the sample mean and population mean. The test value was 20 hours and the

students average weekly hours is 16.41. Also, the standard deviation of 13.79 takes into

consideration the few students who work zero hours.

Group Statistics

Std. Error
religious affiliation N Mean Std. Deviation Mean

how many drinks, last 30 Protestant 18 24.33 23.961 5.648

days Catholic 18 21.78 24.121 5.685

3.) Two independent sample t test

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test
for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95%

Sig. Std. Confidence

(2- Mean Error Interval of the

tailed Differ Differ Difference

F Sig. t df ) ence ence Lower Upper

how many Equal

-13.7 18.84
drinks, last variances .218 .643 .319 34 .752 2.556 8.014
30 1
30 days assumed

Equal
variances 33.9 -13.7 18.84
.319 .752 2.556 8.014
not 98 30 1
assumed
Using the non-random sample data base 61 bobcats where we collected data from 61 Texas State

students. I ran an independent sample t test and see if there was a difference in drinks consumed

the last 30 days between the Catholic and Protestant religious groups. Growing up I had many

Catholic friends who believed that they were more religiously sound than Protestants. Most

believed that Protestants drank way more than Catholics. So I figured it would be interesting to

run a t test and see if there is a significant difference.

Null H0: There is no significant difference in how many drinks consumed in the past 30 days for

Catholic and Protestant religions.

Results: The Catholics had a mean score of 21.78 drinks while the Protestants consumed an of

average of 24.33 drinks. Analyzing the means, one can notice that Protestants do in fact consume

for drinks than Catholics, but with a p value of .643 we fail to reject the null. Meaning that even

though there is a difference in means it is not significant enough at a .05 level.

1. 4.) One Multiple Regression Equation

Model Summary

Mode Adjusted R Std. Error of

l R R Square Square the Estimate

1 .538a .289 .264 1.695

a. Predictors: (Constant), streaming video hours, average weekly,

how many times high, last 30 days

ANOVAa

Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 65.426 2 32.713 11.392 .000b

Residual 160.811 56 2.872
 Total 226.237 58

a. Dependent Variable: estimated salary two years after school

b. Predictors: (Constant), streaming video hours, average weekly, how many times high, last 30
days

Coefficientsa

Standardiz
ed
Unstandardized Coefficient Collinearity
Coefficients s Statistics

Toleran
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. ce VIF

1 (Constant) 3.187 .340 9.364 .000

how many times

.040 .016 .289 2.563 .013 .996 1.004
high, last 30 days

streaming video
hours, average .093 .024 .436 3.861 .000 .996 1.004
weekly

a. Dependent Variable: estimated salary two years after school

The multiple regression equation is Y= 3.187 +.040(high)+.093(stream). By looking at the sig

we would say that the overall equation is significant because our p value is .000 which is below

the standard p value of .05. Now analyzing the adjusted R square I would state that 26.4 percent

of variance in estimated salary two years after school is explained by how many times high in

last 30 days and average weekly hours of streaming video.

5.) Anova

ANOVA
 work hours, average weekly

Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 1187.910 3 395.970 2.208 .097

Within Groups 10222.844 57 179.348

Total 11410.754 60

work hours, average weekly

Tukey Ba,b

Subset for
alpha = 0.05

Race N 1

other 5 9.80

White 29 13.07

Hispanic 16 20.50

Black 11 22.27

Anova is a test that compares the mean of a variable for three or more groups. The variable I

chose is average hours worked weekly and tested it against the race of the respondents group.

The reason I chose this variable and group is because I wanted to see how race had an effect on

the number of hours worked weekly by Texas State students. I am a African American working

student at Texas State and was curious to see if there was a difference between the race. I have

three roommates one is white the other two are African American. My African American

roommates and I work a lot more hours a week than my white roommate. So I wanted to run a

Anova test to see if there is a significant difference.

Null H0: There is no significant difference in average hours worked weekly and race
Results: Analyzing the means you can notice that African Americans have the highest average at

22.27 hours followed by Hispanics 20.50 hours, Whites 13.07, and Other 9.80. First analysis we

can infer that African Americans on average work the greater number of hours, but with further

analysis based on the significant level of .05. We would fail to reject the null and state there is

no significant difference between average hours worked weekly and race because the p value

was .097.

6.) Pearsons R correlation

Descriptive Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

how many times high, last

7.70 14.408 60
30 days

streaming video hours,

10.05 9.139 61
average weekly

Correlations

how many streaming video

times high, hours, average
last 30 days weekly

how many times high, last Pearson Correlation 1 .074

30 days Sig. (1-tailed) .286

N 60 60

streaming video hours, Pearson Correlation .074 1

average weekly Sig. (1-tailed) .286

N 60 61

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

With correlation I am trying to find a systematic connection between two variables. The

variables I chose is how many times have you got high in past 30 days, and average hours of
video streaming weekly. The reason I chose to test these two variables is to see if the

stereotypical stoner who just gets high and watches Netflix is somewhat truthful.

Null H0: There is no correlation between how many times you got high in the past 30 days and

the average hours of video streaming weekly.

Results: In general, we fail to reject the null and state that getting high and video streaming have

no systematic connection, because the p value is .286 which is more than the significant level of .

05. In addition, there is a moderate positive correlation of 0.5 percent (.074)^2 of the variances in

getting high and hours of video streaming weekly.