Material Processing IE 3130 HW #2

Jake Solberg

1. A

Ho(in) 0.95
Do(in) 0.54
Ao(in) 0.2291

Load , Displaceme Area(in True True Eng Eng

lb nt, in H (In) ^2) Strain Stress Strain Stress
0 0 0.95 0.2291 0 0 0 0
0.938 0.2318 0.0118 14911. 0.0117 15089.
3457 0.0112 8 332 595 584 89 48
0.936 0.2324 0.0145 19827. 0.0144 20117.
4609 0.0137 3 522 26 732 21 85
0.933 0.2330 0.0171 24717. 0.0170 25146.
5761 0.0162 8 745 997 415 53 22
0.931 0.2335 0.0194 29597. 0.0192 30178.
6914 0.0183 7 999 511 619 63 96
0.929 0.2341 34455. 0.0213 35207.
8066 0.0203 7 024 0.0216 008 68 33
1037 0.925 0.2351 0.0261 44096. 0.0257 45264.
0 0.0245 5 648 279 74 89 08
1152 0.923 0.2357 0.0286 48877. 0.0282 50296.
3 0.0268 2 506 161 914 11 81
1267 0.920 0.2363 0.0313 53618. 0.0308 55325.
5 0.0293 7 908 277 84 42 19
1382 0.918 0.2370 0.0339 58339. 0.0333 60353.
7 0.0317 3 086 378 654 68 56
1428 0.916 0.2374 0.0357 60173. 0.0351 62365.
8 0.0334 6 482 908 13 58 78
1474 0.914 0.2379 0.0380 61972. 0.0373
9 0.0355 5 934 845 297 68 64378
1497 0.913 0.2382 0.0391 62869. 0.0384 65381.
9 0.0365 5 54 786 887 21 93
1521 0.2386 0.0408 63734. 66390.
0 0.038 0.912 458 22 614 0.04 22
1567 0.907 0.2397 0.0455 65356. 0.0445 68402.
1 0.0423 7 764 481 736 26 44
1613 0.903 0.2409 0.0504 66953. 0.0491 70414.
2 0.0467 3 443 073 229 58 67
1659 0.899 0.2419 0.0545 68580. 0.0530 72422.
2 0.0504 6 353 118 317 53 52
1682 0.897 0.2424 0.0566 69388. 0.0550 73430.
3 0.0523 7 474 26 257 53 82
1705 0.895 0.2429 0.0587 70188. 0.0570 74434.
3 0.0542 8 616 448 047 53 74
 1728 0.894 0.2433 0.0605 71011. 0.0587 75443.
4 0.0558 2 963 325 752 37 04
1774 0.890 0.2444 0.0650 72579. 0.0629 77455.
5 0.0598 2 9 158 655 47 26
1843 0.883 0.2463 0.0726 74829. 0.0701 80471.
6 0.0666 4 72 839 94 05 41
1958 0.870 0.2499 0.0869 78380. 0.0832 85499.
8 0.0791 9 081 348 8 63 78
2074 0.2542 0.1041 81574. 0.0989 90532.
1 0.094 0.856 582 916 564 47 52
2189 0.2597 0.1254 84294. 0.1178 95560.
3 0.112 0.838 196 439 764 95 89
2304 0.821 0.2648 0.1449 87015. 0.1349 10058
5 0.1282 8 394 649 006 47 9.3
2419 0.798 0.2724 0.1734 88796. 0.1592 10561
7 0.1513 7 991 766 636 63 7.6
2535 0.774 0.2810 0.2042 90209. 0.1847 11065
0 0.1755 5 136 443 171 37 0.4
2650 0.750 0.2898 0.2353 91422. 0.2096 11567
2 0.1992 8 841 227 737 84 8.7
2880 0.717 0.3034 0.2811 94923. 0.2450 12573
6 0.2328 2 649 072 675 53 5.5
2995 0.692 0.3143 0.3164 95295. 0.2712 13076
9 0.2577 3 796 426 622 63 8.2
3111 0.669 0.3251 0.3502 95672. 0.2954 13579
1 0.2807 3 83 296 275 74 6.6
3341 0.636 0.3417 0.3998 97783. 0.3295 14585
5 0.3131 9 255 493 149 79 3.3

Eng Stress vs Strain

200000

150000

Eng Stress 100000

Eng Stress
(Psi)
50000

0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

Eng Strain
(In/In)

B.
 True Stress vs Strain
120000
100000
80000
True Stress 60000
True Stress
(Psi) 40000
20000
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

True Strain
(In/In)

c. Yes the K the strength coiefficent is on line with the small strain hardening of the
steel so the estimates are resonable.

Plastic Portion
K= 128265 N= 0.2072
100000
80000 f(x) = 128264.76 x^0.21
60000 Power ()
True Stress 40000
20000
0
0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22

True Strain
d. Yes the E= 2E + 6is is the average young modulus of engineering plot

Elastic Portion
Youngs Modulus( E)= 2E + 6
80000
60000
f(x) = 1907154.42x - 4832.02
Eng Stress 40000 Linear ()
(Psi)
20000
0
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04

Eng Strain
(In/In)

2. The Plot shows that both eng strain and true strain increase as length
decreases so they are proportional to each other.

Gl(in) 1
Eng True Eng
Strain L(in) Strain Strain
0.0099
0.01 0.99009901 5 0.01
0.98039215 0.0198
0.02 7 03 0.02
0.97087378 0.0295
0.03 6 59 0.03
0.96153846 0.0392
0.04 2 21 0.04
0.95238095 0.0487
0.05 2 9 0.05
0.90909090 0.0953
0.1 9 1 0.1
 0.83333333 0.1823
0.2 3 22 0.2
0.66666666 0.4054
0.5 7 65 0.5
0.6931
1 0.5 47 1

Eng Strain vs True Strain

1.2

0.8

0.6 Eng Strain

Eng Strain
0.4

0.2

0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

True Strain

3. The factors of hardness you need to consider is the zone of deformation

under the indenter must be allowed to develop freely because convex
surfaces give lower reading values. Also the in the indentation should be ten
times as large as the depth to give a representative hardness value for the
bulk material. Lastly the Surface preparation is necessary, if conducting
Rockwell test and other tests, except Brinell test. The results of the test
indicate how strong the material can be till after elastic to plastic behavior
happens.

4. Do= 18mm D=1.2mm =Ln(D/Do)^2= 5.4161 e^ = e^LN(L/Lo)

e^5.4161= (L/Lo) = 224.99 =225 e=(L- Lo)/Lo = L/Lo 1 = e = 224.99- 1
= 223.99= 224

5. out= 50,000Psi, n = 0.3 =K^n =n 50,000psi= k (0.3^0.3) ==

50000/0.6968=k k=71751.93
6. Some mechanical properties you would want to have for an elevator cable
would be a high tensile strength before the cable fails also a high ductitly
factor so it deforms slowly over time and a strong fatigue limit to support the
weight of the elevator and its passengers. For a wire coat you would want a
higher elastic curve to allow reshaping of the hanger to any fit. Also a high
tensile strength to support the weight at the top of the hanger. For a paper
clip you would want a high compression rate so the paper clip wouldnt break
under pressure. Another thing would be a medium level youngs modulus to
allow bending without breaking.

7. =F/A =K^n =n utsA = 60,000(Psi)0.5^0.5== 42426.41Psi*

0.6in^2== 25455.85N utsB = 30,000(Psi)0.5^0.5== 21213.20(Psi)*
0.3in^2== 6363.96N so the max force on the cable is 6363.96N

8. On Back Sheet