Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Physica E
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/physe
a r t i c l e i n f o abstract
Article history: Instability occurs in double-walled carbon nanotubes when a uid ows through them. This is inves-
Received 21 October 2010 tigated using an elastic shell model based on Donnells shell theory. The dynamic governing equations
Received in revised form of double-walled carbon nanotubes are derived on the basis of nonlocal elasticity theory, and the van
17 March 2011
der Waals interaction between the inner and outer walls is considered. Instability induced by a
Accepted 21 March 2011
pressure-driven steady ow is studied. The numerical computations reveal that as the ow velocity
Available online 29 March 2011
increases, double-walled carbon nanotubes have a destabilizing style to get through multi-bifurcations
of the rst (pitchfork) and second (Hamiltonian Hopf) bifurcations in turn. It can be concluded that the
critical ow velocity of the ow-induced instability is closely correlated to the ratio of the length to the
radius of double-walled carbon nanotubes, the pressure of the uid and the small size effects.
& 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction (MWCNTs) combining not only van der Waals forces but also the
effects of small length scales. His results demonstrated that as the
Since the landmark paper by Iijima [1], carbon nanotubes small length scale gets larger in magnitude the critical axial strain
(CNTs) have attracted worldwide attention due to their potential gets smaller compared to the results with classical continuum
use in the elds of chemistry, physics, nano-engineering, elec- mechanics. Zhang et al. [11] investigated a nonlocal multi-shell
trical engineering and materials science. CNTs can be used as model for the axial buckling of MWCNTs under axial compression.
strong, light and high toughness bers for composite structures, Their results indicated that both the buckling mode and the length
parts of nano-devices and for hydrogen storage [25]. Although of tubes have contributions to the inuence of the small scale on the
classical or local continuum models, such as beam and shell axial buckling strain. Zhang et al. [12,13] adopted the theory of
models, are practical in analyzing CNTs for large systems, nonlocal elasticity to investigate free transverse vibrations of dou-
however, size effects often become remarkable at nanometer scales, ble-walled carbon nanotubes. Wang and Hu [14] investigated
therefore, the modeling of size-dependent phenomena has become a exural wave propagation in single-walled carbon nanotubes, their
topic of interest [6,7]. Based on the theory of nonlocal elasticity [8], study focuses on the wave dispersion by considering a model of
the scale effect was claried in elasticity by assuming the stress to traditional Timoshenko beam in conjunction with the theory of
be a functional of the strain eld at every point in the body. In this nonlocal elasticity. Wang [15] studied wave propagation in carbon
sense, the internal size scale could be considered simply as a nanotubes by nonlocal continuum mechanics. They investigated
material parameter in the constitutive equations. The application wave propagation in CNTs with both EulerBernoulli and
of nonlocal elasticity models in nanomaterials was proposed by Timoshenko beam models by considering the nonlocal elasticity.
Peddieson et al. [9]. They applied the nonlocal elasticity to formulate Recently, uid ow inside CNTs has become an interesting
a nonlocal version of EulerBernoulli beam model, and concluded subject. The properties of uidity, diffusivity, and viscosity, and
that nonlocal continuum mechanics could potentially play an the dynamics of uid in a ne pore have been investigated
important role in nanotechnology applications. Further applications [16,17]. The dynamic properties of hydrogen bonding [18], the
of the nonlocal continuum mechanics have been utilized in inves- effects of walluid interaction [19], the dependence of uid
tigating the mechanical behavior of CNTs. Sudak [10] investigated behavior on the spatial size of CNTs [20], and other issues have
the innitesimal column buckling of multi-walled carbon nanotubes been extensively investigated in the nanoow and microow
elds. The instability problems of uid-lled CNTs are of central
interest in the eld. Wang et al. [21] investigated the elastic
n
Corresponding author. Tel.: 886 7 6011000x2111; fax: 886 7 6011017. buckling of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) under
E-mail address: tpchang@ccms.nkfust.edu.tw (T.-P. Chang). external radial pressure using a multi-walled shell model, and
1386-9477/$ - see front matter & 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.physe.2011.03.015
1420 T.-P. Chang, M.-F. Liu / Physica E 43 (2011) 14191426
where Fi(x,y) is the stress function. Denote the axial and circum- where Mxi is the bending moment per unit length. Substituting
ferential displacements of ui(x,y) and ni(x,y), and the stressstrain Eqs. (15) and (16) into the right-hand side of Eq. (6), the
relationship is obtained as differential equations for the stress function Fi are obtained as
, !2
Eh @ui u @vi mwi px
Nxi , 13 Ehp2 A1,n t p2 n2
1m2 @x Ri @y Ri F1 cosnysin
L2 R1 L2 R21 L
, !2
Eh wi @ui 1 @vi 4Ehp2 A2,n t 4p2 n2 2px
Nyi m : 14 cosn ysin , 18
1m2 Ri @x Ri @y L2 R1 L2 R21 L
x 1010
7
Ref. [24]
6 Present study
Natural frequency (Hz)
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
U (m/s)
25
Ref. [25]
Dimensionless first frequency
Present study
20
15
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Dimensionless flow velocity vn
Fig. 4. Evolution of the imaginary and real part of the eigenvalues with velocity U
Fig. 3. First dimensionless frequency as a function of dimensionless ow velocity for L/R2 10 and n 2. Solid line: e0a0.0 nm, dashed line: e0a 1.0 nm, dotted
for a clampedclamped DWCNT with e0a/L 0.1. line: e0a 2.0 nm.
1422 T.-P. Chang, M.-F. Liu / Physica E 43 (2011) 14191426
Fig. 5. Evolution of the imaginary and real part of the eigenvalues with velocity U for L/R2 50 and n 2. Solid line: e0a 0.0 nm, dashed line: e0a 1.0 nm, dotted line:
e0a 2.0 nm.
T.-P. Chang, M.-F. Liu / Physica E 43 (2011) 14191426 1423
instability occurs and the corresponding ow velocity is referred the gap between the two walls is 0.34 nm. The parameters that are
to as the critical velocity. used to calculate the van der Waals interaction coefcient are taken
as e 2.96 mev, a1.42 A, and s 3.407 A [31,32]. The other
modeling parameters of the tubes are Eh360 J/m2, the thickness
4. Numerical computations and discussions h0.34 nm, the mass density of the tube rt 2300 kg/m3, the mass
density of the uid rf 1000 kg/m3, and D0.85 eV[33]. The inner
Two quantitative comparisons are performed to prove the radius and outer radius are taken as R1 11.9 and R2 12.2 nm,
validity of the present approach. In quantitative comparisons, respectively.
rst of all, the numerical results based on the present study are In the numerical examples, two cases, n2 and n 5, are
compared with those obtained from Ref. [24]. All the input data considered. The evolution of the real and imaginary parts of the
must be exactly the same for comparison, therefore, the gap eigenvalues of the system (for n2) as the ow velocity U are
between the two walls is taken as h 0.34 nm, Youngs modulus of presented in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively, for the ratios L/R2 10 and
the DWCNT is E1 TPa, and the mass density is rt 2300 kg/m3 for L/R2 50. The solid lines, dashed lines and dotted lines denote the
CNTs and pf 1000 kg/m3 for the uid. The inner radius and outer results without the scale effect (e0a0.0 nm) and with the scale
radius are taken as R1 3.5 nm and R2 R1 h, separately, and the effects (e0a1.0 nm and e0a2.0 nm) separately. As it is detected
van der Waals interaction coefcients are selected from the from Fig. 4(a) that for L/R2 10, the imaginary parts decreases
expression written in Eq. (3) of Ref. [24]. The boundary conditions as the ow velocity increases, when the ow velocity is up to
of DWCNT are simply supported at both ends. In Fig. 2, the rst Ud 1942 m/s (for e0a0.0 nm) or Ud 1901 m/s (for e0a1.0 nm )
natural frequency is plotted as a function of uid ow velocity or Ud 1837 m/s (for e0a2.0 nm), a pitchfork bifurcation (diver-
with L/(2R2)10, n 1 and e0a/L0.8. As it can be detected from gence instability) occurs, after that the tube loses stability due to
Fig. 2, the numerical results based on the present study are in having a positive real part as shown in Fig. 4(b). This implies that the
good agreements with those obtained from Ref. [24], besides, the
natural frequencies of the nonlocal shell model are less than those
of the nonlocal beam model, and the critical ow velocity of the
nonlocal shell model is 1636 m/s, which is slightly less than
1653 m/s obtained from the nonlocal beam model. The differ-
ences occur because the nonlocal shell model is adopted in the
present study, while the nonlocal beam model is used in Ref. [24];
in addition, the small scale effects are considered for both the
uid and the van der Waals force as stated in Eqs. (4)(7) in the
present nonlocal shell model, however, the small scale effect was
not taken into account for the uid in the nonlocal beam model in
Ref. [24]. Secondly, the numerical results based on the present
study are compared with those obtained from Ref. [25]. The
DWCNT has an inner diameter di of 0.35 nm and an outer
diameter do of 1.75 nm. The gap between the two walls is taken
as h 0.35 nm, the mass density is rt 2300 kg/m3 for CNTs and
rf 1000 kg/m3 for the uid respectively. Youngs modulus of the
DWCNT is E 1 TPa, the van der Waals interaction coefcient is
c 0.069 TPa, and the other geometric and material parameters
used in the calculations are as follows: e0a/L0.10 and L/d0 10.
It should be noted that the boundary conditions of DWCNT are
assumed as clamped at both ends in Ref. [25], therefore, the
transverse displacement mode shapes of Eqs. (15) and (16) must
be changed to satisfy the clampedclamped boundary conditions
for the purpose of comparisons, furthermore, all the rest of the
derivations in the present study must be reformulated in accor-
dance with the change of the transverse displacement mode
shapes for clampedclamped boundary conditions. In Fig. 3,
the rst dimensionless frequency is plotted as a function of
dimensionless ow velocity for a clampedclamped DWCNT with
e0a/L0.1. Once again, the numerical results based on the present
study are in good agreements with those obtained from Ref. [25],
both the natural frequency and the critical ow velocity of the
nonlocal shell model are less than those of the nonlocal beam
model. The discrepancies occur because the nonlocal shell model
is adopted in the present study, while the nonlocal beam model is
used in Ref. [25]; besides, the small scale effects are considered
for both the uid and the van der Waals force in the proposed
nonlocal shell model, on the other hand, the small scale effects are
neglected for both the uid and the van der Waals force in the
nonlocal beam model in Ref. [25].
In the present study, the DWCNTs under consideration are
simply supported at both ends, as shown in Fig. 1, and water that Fig. 6. Evolution of the imaginary and real part of the eigenvalues with velocity U
is driven by pressure goes through the inner tube at a steady for L/R2 10 and n 5. Solid line: e0a0.0 nm, dashed line: e0a 1.0 nm, dotted
velocity. The inner and outer tubes have the same length L and line: e0a 2.0 nm.
1424 T.-P. Chang, M.-F. Liu / Physica E 43 (2011) 14191426
tube absorbs energy from the ow to amplify the vibration. However, L/R2 50, the bifurcating characteristics become more complicated
when the ow velocity is continually up to Ur 2626 m/s (for than in the case of L/R2 10 since the comparative stiffness of the
e0a0.0 nm) or Ur 2586 m/s (for e0a1.0 nm ) or Ur 2476 m/s system is smaller.
(for e0a2.0 nm), the stability is restored, and then the second For instance, before the utter instability comes into effect, rst
instability (utter instability) on a Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcation divergence instability and restabilization occur very closely at Ud
comes rapidly at Uf 3514 m/s (for e0a0.0 nm) or Uf 3454 m/s 1457 m/s and Ur 1462 m/s (for e0a0.0 nm ) or Ud 1436 m/s and
(for e0a1.0 nm) or Uf3308 m/s (for e0a 2.0 nm). In the case of Ur 1442 m/s (for e0a1.0 nm) or Ud 1380 m/s and Ud 1385 m/s
(for e0a2.0 nm). For the case of n5, similar bifurcation of the
system are shown in Figs. 6 and 7, respectively. The details of the
comparisons of the critical ow velocity are listed in Table 1. Based
on the numerical computations presented in Table 1 and Figs. 47, it
can be concluded that the natural frequency of DWCNTs and the
critical ow velocity of the ow-induced instability are closely
correlated to the ratio of the length to the radius of DWCNTs, the
pressure of the uid and the small scale effects. Furthermore, it is
interesting to notice that as the small scale effects are considered,
the natural frequencies and the rst critical ow velocities of
DWCNTs decrease as compared to the results with the classical
(local) continuum mechanics, these phenomena are in good agree-
ments with the results from the nonlocal double-beam model in
Refs. [24,25]. Basically these two papers dealt with the frequencies
and the critical ow velocity of double-walled carbon nanotubes
conveying uid by adopting nonlocal double-elastic beam model.
However, we used nonlocal shell model to cope with the ow-
induced instability of double-walled carbon nanotubes, in fact, that
is the principal goal and originality of the present study.
5. Conclusions
Table 1
Comparisons of critical ow velocity U (m/s). D divergence, R restabilization, F utter.
n U L/R2 10e0 L/R2 10e0 L/R2 10e0 L/R2 50e0 L/R2 50e0 L/R2 50e0
a 0.0 nm a 1.0 nm a 2.0 nm a0.0 nm a 1.0 nm a 2.0 nm
A:13
A set of the linear ordinary differential equations for the
unknown Am,n(t) is written as follows: where
!
! U 2 rf p2 In pR1 =L c012 m01
U 2 rf p2 In pR1 =L c012 m01 C21 g21n 1 a1 b1 ,
A 1,n t g21n 1 a1 b A t 2m1 I0n pR1 =L rt h m1
2m1 I0n pR1 =L 1
rt h m1 1,n
4U rf LIn 2pR1 =L c012 m01 4U rf LIn 2pR1 =L
1 a1 b1 A_ 2,n t A t 0, A:1 C24 1 a2 b1 ,
3m1 I0n pR1 =L rt h m1 3,n 3m1 I0n pR1 =L
! 8U rf LIn 2pR1 =L
2
U 2 rf p2 In 2pR1 =L c00 12 m02 C42 1 a1 b1 ,
A 2,n t g2n 1 a2 b1 A t 3m2 I0n pR1 =L
m2 I0n 2pR1 =L rt h m2 2,n
!
8U rf LIn 2pR1 =L c00 12 m02 U 2 rf p2 In 2pR1 =L c00 12 m02
1 a2 b1 A_ 1,n t A t 0, C43 g 2
1 a2 b1 ,
3m2 I0n pR1 =L rt h m2 4,n 2n
m2 I0n 2pR1 =L rt h m2
A:2
0 rt hpL rf L2 In pR1 =L
m3 2 c0 m0 c0 m0 m01 ,
A 3,n t g3n 21 3 A3,n t 21 3 A1,n t 0, A:3 2 2I0n pR1 =L
m3 rt h m3 rt h m3
0 rt hpL rf L2 In 2pR1 =L
m4 2 c00 21 m04 c00 21 m04 m02 ,
A 4,n t g4n A4,n t A t 0, A:4 2 4I0n 2pR1 =L
m4 rt h m4 rt h m4 2,n
rt hpL
where m03 ,
2
p2 2
2
n 2p n2
a1 e0 a2 , b1 e0 a2 2 , a2 e0 a2 , b2 e0 a2 2 , rt hpL
L R1 L R2 m04 ,
2
c012 c12 1 a1 b1 , c00 12 c12 1 a2 b1 , rt hpL rf L2 In pR1 =L
m1 1 a1 b1 1 a1 b1 ,
c012 c21 1 a1 b2 , c 00
21 c21 1 a2 b2 : 2 2I0n pR1 =L
Eqs. (A.1A.4) can be converted into the state space with eight rt hpL rf L2 In 2pR1 =L
rst order differential equations as follows: m2 1 a2 b1 1 a2 b1 ,
2 4I0n 2pR1 =L
A_ 1,n t B1 t, A:5
rt hpL
! m3 1 a1 b2 ,
2 2 2
U rf p In pR1 =L c012 m01
B_ 1 t g21n 1 a1 b1 A1,n t
2m1 I0n pR1 =L rt h m1 rt hpL
m4 1 a2 b2 ,
2
4U rf LIn 2pR1 =L c012 m01
1 a2 b1 q2 t A3,n t, A:6 2 !2 , !2 3
3m1 I0n 2pR1 =L rt h m1
2 pL 4 p2 n2 Ehp4 p2 n2 5,
g
1n D 2 2 2 4 2
2
2m1 L R1 R1 L L R1
A_ 2,n t B2 t, A:7
2 !2 , !2 3
!
U 2 rf p2 In 2pR1 =L c00 12 m02 2 pL 4 4p2 n2 16Ehp4 4p2 n2 5,
B_ 2 t g22n 1 a2 b1 A t g
2n D 2
2 2
m2 I0n 2pR1 =L rt h m2 2,n 2m2 L R1 R21 L4 L2 R1
A_ 4,n t B4 t, A:11
References
0
m4 2 c00 21 m04 c00 21 m04
B_ 4 t g4n A t A t: A:12 [1] S. Iijima, Nature 354 (1991) 56.
m4 rt h m4 4,n rt h m4 2,n [2] A. Bachtold, P. Hadley, T. Nakaniski, C. Dekker, Science 294 (2001) 1317.
1426 T.-P. Chang, M.-F. Liu / Physica E 43 (2011) 14191426
[3] M.S. Dresselhaus, P. Avouris, Top. Appl. Phys. 80 (2001) 1. [19] V.P. Sokhan, D. Nicholson, N. Quirke, J. Chem. Phys. 115 (2001) 3878.
[4] Z.C. Tu, Z.C. Ou-Yang, Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002) 233407. [20] R.E. Tuzun, D.W. Noid, B.G. Sumpter, R.C. Merkle, Nanotechnol. 7 (1996)
[5] K.T. Lau, D. Hui, Composites B 33 (2003) 263. 241.
[6] P.E. Sheehan, C.M. Lieber, Science 272 (1996) 1158. [21] C.Y. Wang, C.Q. Ru, A. Mioduchowski, Int. J. Solids Struct. 40 (1996) 3893.
[7] B.I. Yakobson, M.P. Campbell, C.J. Brabec, J. Bernholc, Comput. Mater. Sci. 8 [22] J. Yoon, C.Q. Ru, A. Mioduchowski, Int. J. Solids Struct. 43 (2006) 3337.
(1997) 241. [23] Y. Yan, X.Q. He, L.X. Zhang, J. Appl. Phys. 102 (2007) 044307-1.
[8] A.C. Eringen, Nonlocal Polar Field Models, Academic, New York, 1976. [24] L. Wang, Comput. Mater. Sci. 45 (2009) 584.
[9] J. Peddieson, G.R. Buchanan, R.P. McNitt., Int. J. Eng. Sci. 41 (2003) 305. [25] H.L. Lee, W.J. Chang, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 (2009) 115302.
[10] L.J. Sudak, J. Appl. Phys. 94 (2003) 7281. [26] L. Wang, Comput. Mater. Sci. 49 (2010) 761.
[11] Y.Q. Zhang, G.R. Liu, J.S. Wang, Phys. Rev. B. 70 (2004) 205430. [27] L. Wang, J. Fluids Struct. 26 (2010) 675.
[12] Y.Q. Zhang, G.R. Liu, X. Han, Phys. Lett. A 340 (2005) 258. [28] A.C. Erignen, J. Appl. Phys. 54 (1983) 4703.
[13] Y.Q. Zhang, G.R. Liu, X.Y. Xie, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 195404-1. [29] M. Amabili, F. Pellicano, M.P. Paidoussis, J. Sound Vib. 225 (1999) 655.
[14] L. Wang, H. Hu, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 195412. [30] H.S. Shen, C.L. Zhang, Composite Struct. 92 (2010) 1073.
[15] Q. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 124301. [31] X.Q. He, S. Kitipornchai, K.M. Liew, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 53 (2005) 303.
[16] I. Bitsanis, J.J. Magda, M. Tirrell, J. Chem. Phys. 87 (1987) 1733. [32] R. Saito, R. Matsuo, T. Kimura, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus, Chem. Phys.
[17] S. Paul, A. Chandra, Chem. Phys. Lett. 373 (2003) 87. Lett. 348 (2001) 187.
[18] G. Hummer, J.C. Rasaiah, J.P. Noworyta, Nature 414 (2001) 188. [33] C.Q. Ru, J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) 7227.