Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
14
The crime of theft of means of transportation requires proof that the defendant, without
lawful authority, knowingly:
[controlled another person's means of transportation with the intent to deprive the person
of the means of transportation.]
If the defendant is charged with A.R.S. 13-1814(A)(5), the court may instruct on the
statutory permissible inference under A.R.S. 13-2305 (Statutory Criminal Instruction 23.05).
Intentionally or with the intent to is defined in A.R.S. 13-105 (Statutory Definition Instruction
1.056(a)(1)).
Comment: State v. Dixon, 127 Ariz. 554, 622 P.2d 501 (App. 1981) held that a single act may
result in a theft conviction under any one or combination of the subsections of A.R.S.
13-1802, even though the mens rea for the subsections varies, and that the jury need not be
unanimous as to which subsection was violated so long as they are unanimous on the question of
whether the defendants conduct constituted theft. Because the subsections of A.R.S. 13-1814
track those of A.R.S. 13-1802, the same rationale should apply.