Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#353 COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Saturday, March 04, 2017 2:20:32 PM
Last Modified: Saturday, March 04, 2017 2:58:49 PM
Time Spent: 00:38:16
IP Address: 98.183.205.186

PAGE 1: Placement Information

Q1: Student Teacher's Name Allie Yowell

Q2: Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Elementary Education, PreK-6

Q3: Grade Taught Fourth Grade

Q4: Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/09/2017

Q5: Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/03/2017

Q6: School of Student Teaching Placement Indian Lakes Elementary School

Q7: School Division Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8: Evaluator's Name (First Last) Natali Shultz

Q9: Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.
Email Address: njshultz@vbschools.com

Q10: Evaluator's Position/Role Classroom Teacher

Q11: What time period is this evaluation for? Final

PAGE 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject Superior
area(s) taught.

Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the Superior

age group.

Integrates key content elements and facilitates students Proficient

use of higher level thinking skills.

Links content with other subject areas and real world Superior
applications.

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q13: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.
Allie demonstrated knowledge of the content she was teaching beyond what was in the curriculum. She was able to
clearly communicate this knowledge to her students without having to refer to notes or curriculum content. If she didn't
know the curriculum she would seek the proper resources to be able to understand the objectives being taught.

PAGE 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Aligns lesson objectives to the schools curriculum and Superior
student learning needs.

Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner Superior

needs; adapts plans as needed.

Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Superior

transitions.

Plans for differentiated instruction. Superior

Q15: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.
Allie differentiated by providing small group instruction in science and language arts. She reflected daily on her
instruction using student performance to guide her instructional delivery and adjusting her plans as necessary. Her
plans were always prepared thoroughly and appropriately.

PAGE 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

Q16: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Engages and maintains students in active learning. Proficient

Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs. Superior

Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Proficient

Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and Superior

resources.

Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Superior

Q17: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.
Allie was able to engage students daily through small group, differentiated lessons in both subjects she taught. While
she was teaching, students were completing independent, technology integrated activities. At her teacher station she
used a variety of reading strategies, sorts, and engaging literacy based games.

PAGE 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q18: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Superior

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Superior

instruments

Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Superior

purposes.

Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Proficient

Q19: Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student
learning.
Allie used a variety of formative and summative assessment techniques. She was able to use the results to form
differentated groups based on the results of preassesments. She also used results of summative assessments to
provide remediation for students who were not proficient.

PAGE 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Proficient
procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.

Uses available resources and knowledge of students to Superior

prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors.

Respects students diversity, including language, culture, Superior

race, gender, and special needs.

Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and Superior

responses.

Q21: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive
to learning.
From the first week, Allie treated students with respect. She has a calm manner and willingness to build relationships
with her students. Allie made improvements each week with her implementation of routines and procedures so that time
was used effectively. Each week, she also improved the level of student engagement by requiring students' attention
using various techniques.

PAGE 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q22: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Modifies performance based on personal and professional Superior
critiques.

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Superior

professional interactions.

Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration Exemplary

with teachers and other school personnel.

Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and Exemplary

ethical interactions.

Q23: Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.
From the beginning Allie was willing to take risks. For example, during a grade level collaboration our Technology
Specialist was informing us about an app based learning tool, later that same day Allie was meeting with her after
school to start planning a way to use the app. She displayed confidence during grade level plannings by discussing
student performance, sharing ideas and opinions about upcoming activities, and analyzing student data.

PAGE 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Documents the progress of each student throughout the Superior
placement.

Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Proficient

Uses available data to document/communicate student Superior

progress and develop learning targets.

Q25: Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.
Students performed well on their science benchmark test which was a piece of evidence that Allie provided effective
instruction that held students accountable for learning. If students were. It meeting objectives throughout the unit, she
would plan ways to meet with those students to remediate.

4/4