Maths can say your past and the

likely future events! A myth or

science...

The antecedent of astrology provides a lot of number belief

system which holds a relationship between astronomical
phenomena and the likely events or descriptions of personality
in the human world. Interestingly though astrology has been
rejected by the science community since the philosophy of
astrology could not establish the relationship between planets
and human behavior.

Research also has evidence that there are astrologers have

found statistical relationships between the human birth date
and time with the movement of Mars Orbit.

However, certain studies have revealed that most of the

professional astrologers perform astrology-based personality
tests and make predictions relevant to the person. Arguably,
people who continued to faith in astrology have been doing so
with the known fact that there is no scientific relationship
based out in the predictions.

Let us deep dive into some factors which drives the argument
of the science in astrology:
Aims to explain the natural world
Astrology relies on the evidence of facts of the planetary
movements and positions of heavenly bodies which generate
predictions and explanations for events. For example, a person
born after the spring equinox is likely to become an
entrepreneur. Science differs on this note, that the person
future course of action is very futuristic in nature and hence
does not comply with the actual reality of the predictions.
The likely events of the prediction are quite long enough to
be proven. So the predictions could not able to substantiate
its predictive outcome.

Uses testable idea

Predictions generated by astrologers are very general in
nature and the outcome could be used to any fitted
expectations. These are generic in nature and can be used to a
mass population. For example, a zodiac sign impacts ones
ability to command respect and authority. Since these traits
are important specifically to authoritative or leadership
roles, astrologers could not explain the real fact with
peoples personalities. More likely scientists would be more
likely to have zodiac sign relative to scientific research,
however, such predictions if used in real terms, and then the
astrological ideas can be tested.

The Mathematician dilemma

Mathematicians knew that people can be fooled by seeing faces
in clouds or into a host of factors that are non-astrological,
these are - hidden persuaders, reasoning errors and
statistical artifacts. They were also of the view that
astrologers use often twisted questions which they play on
different people with same zodiac sign or an overlapping birth
date and time. This provides a range of data which can be used
as generic answers to people. Mathematicians call these as
switch data.

On the other hand, a scientist does not wait for the events to
mature. However, they use their own arguments and design a
parenthesis or hypotheses and ultimately give up ideas when
warranted by the evidence.

Astrologers, on the flip side, do not seem to examine minutely

the ideas they generate. But use those ideas as reflected by
the minimal level of research in the field which rarely tries
to test their arguments in fairways. Largely, the astrologers
community ignores evidence that contradicts its own ideas.

Lack of predictive power

Astrologers claimed that the position of all the planets must
be authenticated for prediction. However, studies revealed
that they were unable to predict the existence of all
planetary positions and thus the positions were used to
superficially predict in the horoscopes.

The scientist also argued that while astrologers have taken

account of the planetary positions and predicted the
horoscopes, they have also to confirm with affirmative action
that they have also considered the growing list of other
celestial bodies discovered simultaneously.

The above discussion concludes that the

astrology is based on some relational
database study which follows a pattern
or trajectory of the planetary
movements. The above discussion also
confirms that science has yet to be
convinced by the prediction ability of the
astrologers and their hypothesis. Hence,
people follow astrology has to only follow by belief mechanism
only.