Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Frequency of Use of Statins and Aspirin in Patients With

Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting


Kevin Curl, MDa,*, Bryan LeBude, MDb, Nicholas Ruggiero, MDa, David Fischman, MDa,
Andrew Rose, MDc, Sulay Patel, MDd, David Ogilby, MDa, Paul Walinsky, MDa, Babu Jasti, MDa, and
Michael Savage, MDa

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is commonly performed to treat ischemic heart
disease, but long-term benets are limited by failed patency of bypass grafts. Both statin
medications and aspirin hold class I indications for all post-CABG patients and should be
continued indenitely unless contraindications exist. Unfortunately, there are limited data
regarding long-term usage of these essential medications. We assessed the utilization rates
of statins and aspirin among post-CABG patients referred for coronary angiography.
Analysis of post-CABG patients presenting to Thomas Jefferson University for a cardiac
catheterization procedure at least 3 years after surgery was performed. Inpatient and
outpatient records were reviewed to assess prescribing patterns of these medications, as well
as other pertinent clinical and laboratory data. The study population was 381 consecutive
patients presenting at a mean of 11 6 years from CABG. Mean age was 69 11 years and
78% were men. A total 67% of patients were being prescribed a statin, whereas 75% were
prescribed aspirin. Only 52% were prescribed both at the time of catheterization. Patients
prescribed a statin had a signicantly lower mean low-density lipoprotein (87 vs 106 [p
<0.01]) and total cholesterol values (151 vs 162 [p <0.01]). A total of 35% of patients had
low-density lipoprotein 100. Only 43% of saphenous vein grafts in the patients not on
statin medications remained patent. In conclusion, long-term statin and aspirin use after
CABG remains suboptimal despite clear guideline recommendations and clinical trial ev-
idence of their effectiveness. 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol
2016;118:40e43)

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains an series of patients who were referred for repeat cardiac
effective and essential therapy for ischemic heart disease. catheterization after previous CABG.
The long-term benets, however, are limited by high rates
of bypass graft stenosis and occlusion.1,2 The benecial Methods
effects of statins and aspirin usage after CABG have been
demonstrated by numerous trials.3e6 In the recently pub- We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical and
lished American Heart Association scientic statement on electronic records in 381 consecutive patients with a history
secondary prevention after CABG surgery, the long-term of previous CABG surgery who underwent a diagnostic
use of statins and aspirin are class Ia indications.7 cardiac catheterization at Thomas Jefferson University
Although many randomized trials have focused on the Hospital for the rst time since their CABG. Patients were
effects of drug therapies on early postoperative graft identied through the cardiac catheterization laboratory
patency, few studies have examined the utilization of these database. Data obtained included age, gender, a history of
proven therapies in the longer term clinical setting. CABG, medical co-morbidities, smoking status, current
Accordingly, the present study was undertaken to assess medications (including statins and antiplatelet drugs), indi-
the frequencies of statin and aspirin use in a consecutive cation for catheterization, lipid panel, glomerular ltration
rate and angiographic ndings of the cardiac catheterization.
Angiographic analysis dened graft status as patent (<50%
a
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson stenosis), diseased (50% to 99% stenosis), and occluded
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; bDivision of Cardiology, (100% stenosis) based on visual estimation. Exclusion
Department of Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown criteria constituted patients with CABG <3 years before the
University Hospital, Washington, DC; cDepartment of Cardiology, Potts- index cardiac catheterization, absence of a lipid panel within
town Medical Associates, Pottstown, Pennsylvania; and dDivision of Car- 30 days before or 7 days after the index cardiac catheteri-
diology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
zation, and incomplete diagnosis of graft status by cardiac
Manuscript received February 11, 2016; revised manuscript received and
catheterization. The Institutional Review Board of Thomas
accepted April 12, 2016.
All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the study.
Jefferson University Hospital approved this study.
See page 43 for disclosure information. Continuous variables are presented as mean  SD and
*Corresponding author: Tel: (1) 609-458-9256; fax: (1) 215-503- were analyzed using factorial analysis of variance. Cate-
3976. gorical variables are displayed as a percentage and were
E-mail address: kevin.curl@jefferson.edu (K. Curl). compared using chi-square statistics. We compared outcome

0002-9149/16/$ - see front matter 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. www.ajconline.org
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.006
Coronary Artery Disease/Medication Underutilization Following Coronary Bypass Surgery 41

Table 1 LDL
Baseline patient characteristics (n 381)
Variable Mean  SD or %

Age (years) 69  11
Men 297 (78%) < 70
Diabetes mellitus 164 (43%)
21%
Hypertension 282 (74%)
100
Current Smoker 53 (14%)
Years Since Coronary Bypass 11  6 35%
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 156  43
Low Density Lipoprotein (mg/dL) 94  36
High Density Lipoprotein (mg/dL) 37  11
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 134  89 70-99
Glomerular Filtration Rate (mL/min/1.73 m2) 62  23 44%
Statin Use 255 (67%)
High Intensity 59 (23%)
Moderate Intensity 174 (68%)
Low Intensity 22 (9%) Figure 1. LDL control based on Adult Treatment Panel III8 guidelines.
Prior Intolerance to Statin 11 (3%)
Aspirin Use 286 (75%)
Clopidogrel Use 80 (21%)
Warfarin Use 51 (13%)
Clinical Indication for Cardiac Catheterization
ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction 19 (5%)
Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction 100 (26%)
Unstable Angina Pectoris 141 (37%)
Chronic Angina Pectoris 36 (9%)
Abnormal Stress Test 50 (13%)
Heart Failure 30 (8%)
Aortic Valve Disease 5 (1%)

variables between patients grouped by their overall status of


grafted vessels and groups of grafted vessels. Statistical
analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 19
Figure 2. Utilization rates of statins, aspirin, and both medications at the
(IBM, Armonk, NY). A p value <0.05 was considered
time of cardiac catheterization.
signicant.

Results
Of the patients on a statin, 26% were found to have
Baseline clinical characteristics are depicted in Table 1. patency of all SVGs compared with 25% of those who were
The mean age of the study population was 69  11 years; not taking a statin (p 0.867). There was no difference in
78% of patients were men and 43% were diabetic. The frequency of the different angiographic states (patent,
median CABG age was 11  6 years; there were an average diseased, or occluded) based on statin usage. In patients
of 2.9 grafts per patient, with 67% of the grafts being taking a statin, 46% of grafts were patent, 31% diseased, and
saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). Indications for catheteriza- 23% occluded, compared with 43% patent, 30% diseased,
tion included unstable angina (37%), noneST elevation and 27% occluded in patients not taking a statin (p 0.517).
myocardial infarction (26%), and abnormal stress test (13%; Revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention
Table 1). Lipid analysis revealed a mean low-density lipo- or repeat CABG was performed in 62% of patients on statin
protein (LDL) of 94  36 mg/dl; 35% of patients had LDL and 55% of patients not on statin (p 0.224).
values 100 mg/dl and only 21% had LDL <70 mg/dl Outcomes were also compared based on the use of
(Figure 1). Utilization rates of statins and aspirin are shown aspirin at the time of catheterization (Table 3). Patients on
in Figure 2. At the time of the catheterization, 67% of aspirin were less likely to be taking warfarin (10% vs 32%;
patients were taking a statin and 75% were taking aspirin p <0.001). There was no difference in the percent of pa-
(Figure 2). Only 52% of patients were taking both aspirin tients with patent grafts according to aspirin usage (26% vs
and a statin. A total of 21% were taking both clopidogrel in 26%) or in the frequency of the different angiographic states
addition to aspirin. Patient characteristics based on statin (patent, diseased, or occluded). Among patients taking
and aspirin status are presented in Tables 2 and 3, respec- aspirin at the time of catheterization, 46% of grafts were
tively. The mean total cholesterol and LDL values were patent, 30% diseased, and 24% occluded. For the patients
signicantly lower in the patients on statin therapy (Figure 3 taking aspirin, 42% of SVGs were patent, 33% were
and Table 2). Those not on statin therapy were more likely diseased, and 25% were occluded (p 0.703). Revascu-
to have LDL values 100 mg/dl (53% vs 26%, p larization was performed in 62% of patients on aspirin and
<0.001; Table 2). 55% of patients not on aspirin (p 0.361).
42 The American Journal of Cardiology (www.ajconline.org)

Table 2
Clinical characteristics by statin status
Clinical Characteristic Statin Use r Value
Yes No
(n255) (n126)

Mean Age (Years) 69  10 71  9 0.265


Men 199 (78%) 101 (80%) 0.681
Acute Coronary Syndrome 161 (63%) 69 (55%) 0.175
Diabetes mellitus 120 (47%) 47 (37%) 0.127
Hypertension 194 (76%) 88 (70%) 0.276
Tobacco use 33 (13%) 20 (16%) 0.412
Aspirin 198 (78%) 91 (72%) 0.267
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy* 91 (24%) 20 (16%) 0.150
Mean Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 151  35 162  49 0.024 Figure 3. Mean lipid values by statin status. All lipid values represented as
Mean Low Density Lipoprotein (mg/dL) 87  28 106  40 <0.001 mg/dl.
Mean High Density Lipoprotein (mg/dL) 37  11 34  11 0.091
Mean Triglyceride (mg/dL) 134  80 118  73 0.107 need for repeat revascularization.3,5 The landmark post-
Low Density Lipoprotein 100 (mg/dL) 66 (26%) 67 (53%) <0.001 CABG trial demonstrated that aggressive lipid management
Glomerular Filtration Rate 62  23 59  26 0.398 led to reduction in the incidence of new vein graft occlusions
(mL/min/1.73 m2) and the number of grafts with progression of atherosclerosis.6
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 150 (59%) 66 (52%) 0.215 Data support initiating statin around the time of surgery,
Repeat CABG surgery 8 (3%) 4 (3%) 0.632
ideally preoperatively, and continuing therapy indenitely,
No Revascularization 97 (38%) 57 (45%) 0.224
unless contraindicated.5,6 Despite the strong evidence to sup-
Bold values highlight statistically signicant differences between groups. port statin therapy after CABG, the Synergy between PCI with
* Aspirin and clopidogrel. Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial demonstrated that
only 75% of patients were prescribed a statin after surgery.10
Similar suboptimal rates have been demonstrated in other
Table 3
Clinical characteristics by aspirin status
studies.11,12 In the mid-1990s, Delacretaz13 found that in 245
patients who had elevated total cholesterol levels undergoing
Clinical Characteristic Aspirin Use r Value CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention, only 38% were
Yes No on lipid-lowering medications. In a retrospective cohort study
(n286) (n95) of more than 9,000 medicare patients treated from 1995 to
2004, only 35.9% received a statin within 90 days of hospital
Mean Age (Years) 70  10 70  9 0.868 discharge after CABG. The rates signicantly improved over
Men 226 (79%) 75 (79%) 0.957
time, from 13.1% in 1995 to 60.9% in 2004.12 Similar tem-
Acute Coronary Syndrome 174 (61%) 56 (59%) 0.873
Diabetes mellitus 126 (44%) 41 (43%) 0.906
poral trends in increased use of statin were demonstrated by
Hypertension 215 (75%) 66 (69%) 0.320 Newby et al. In a general population of patients with coronary
Tobacco use 37 (13%) 16 (17%) 0.347 artery disease, statin use increased from 25% in 1995 to 63% in
Statin Use 198 (69%) 57 (60%) 0.165 2002.14 In a time frame that extended beyond the previously
Clopidogrel Use 66 (23%) 15 (16%) 0.195 noted studies, our analysis revealed a small yet insignicant
Warfarin Use 29 (10%) 30 (32%) 0.001 increase in the utilization of statin therapy.
Mean Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 155  41 153  38 0.620 The benecial effects of aspirin on SVG patency was rst
Mean Low Density Lipoprotein (mg/dL) 93  35 92  31 0.776 demonstrated in the 1980s.15 Preoperative aspirin has been
Mean High Density Lipoprotein (mg/dL) 36  12 35  10 0.404 shown to signicantly improve SVG patency rates and
Mean Triglyceride (mg/dL) 130  90 133  78 0.800
reduce operative morbidity and mortality.16,17 Johnson
Low Density Lipoprotein 100 mg/dL 103 (36%) 29 (31%) 0.517
Glomerular Filtration Rate 62  24 57  24 0.131
et al18 demonstrated a 42% reduction in the relative risk of
(mL/min/1.73 m2) death in post-CABG patients who consistently took aspirin
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 166 (58%) 49 (52%) 0.334 over a 4-year period after surgery compared with patients
Repeat CABG 9 (3%) 3 (3%) 0.611 who did not. A meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials
No Revascularization 112 (39%) 43 (45%) 0.361 similarly showed aspirin signicantly reduced the odds of
graft occlusion during the rst year after CABG, leading to a
Bold values highlight statistically signicant differences between groups. recommendation of indenite use of aspirin post-
operatively.19 The strongest predictor of death in the
SYNTAX trial was a lack of aspirin prescription at hospital
Discussion
discharge.10 Several previous studies have examined the rate
This present study conrms the signicant underutilization of aspirin use in post-CABG patients. In one study with a
of both aspirin and statins in patients during long-term follow- mean of 5.6 years after CABG surgery, the rate of aspirin
up after CABG. Statins play a crucial role in reducing neo- use at hospital admission was 82%.20 Quality improvement
intimal formation and smooth muscle proliferation in SVGs.9 interventions that will increase aspirin prescription patterns
They have been shown to reduce all-cause mortality, prevent after CABG surgery have been the source of investigation
vein graft atherosclerotic disease progression, and decrease the with the emphasis on pay-for-performance indicators.21 Our
Coronary Artery Disease/Medication Underutilization Following Coronary Bypass Surgery 43

ndings highlight the need for coordinated efforts in 9. Porter KE, Naik J, Turner NA, Dickinson T, Thompson MM, London
educating health care providers and patients to improve NJ. Simvastatin inhibits human saphenous vein neointima formation
via inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. J Vasc
long-term medication usage in this high-risk population. Surg 2002;36:150e157.
This present study provides further data supporting 10. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR,
inadequate use of statins and aspirin after CABG. A limi- Mack MJ, Stahle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, Van
tation of the study is its retrospective design; as such, the Dyck N, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW; SYNTAX Investigators.
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass
reasons for withholding aspirin and statin therapy were not grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009;360:
available. Another limitation was that the patient population 961e972.
was preselected in regards to the need of a cardiac cathe- 11. Kulik A, Levin R, Ruel M, Mesana TG, Solomon DH, Choudhry NK.
terization based on clinical symptoms and therefore the graft Patterns and predictors of statin use after coronary artery bypass graft
occlusion rates were high irrespective of drug therapy status. surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:932e938.
12. Kulik A, Shrank WH, Levin R, Choudhry NK. Adherence to statin
The study does not address the utilization of aspirin and therapy in elderly patients after hospitalization for coronary revascu-
statins in the general post-CABG population as only patients larization. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1409e1414.
referred for follow-up cardiac catheterization were assessed. 13. Delacretaz E, Ruiz J, Michalopoulos PG, Saner H, Meier B. Secondary
prevention of ischemic heart disease after coronary revascularization.
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 1998;87:1497e1503.
Disclosures 14. Newby LK, LaPointe NM, Chen AY, Kramer JM, Hammill BG,
DeLong ER, Muhlbaier LH, Califf RM. Long-term adherence to
The authors have no conict of interest to disclose. evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery dis-
ease. Circulation 2006;113:203e212.
1. Campeau L, Enjalbert M, Lesperance J, Bourassa MG, Kwiterovich P, 15. Goldman S, Copeland J, Moritz T, Henderson W, Zadina K, Ovitt T,
Wacholder S, Sniderman A. The relation of risk factors to the devel- Doherty J, Read R, Chesler E, Sako Y, Lancaster L, Emery R, Sharma
opment of atherosclerosis in saphenous-vein bypass grafts and the GVRK, Josa M, Pacold I, Montoya A, Parikh D, Sethi G, Holt J,
progression of disease in the native circulation. A study 10 years after Kirklin J, Shabetai R, Moores W, Aldridge J, Masud Zaki, DeMots H,
aortocoronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1329e1332. Floten S, Haakenson C, Harker L. Improvement in early saphenous
2. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper GD, Burton vein graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery with antiplatelet
JR. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic therapy: results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Cir-
follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 culation 1988;77:1324e1332.
patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616e626. 16. Dacey LJ, Munoz JJ, Johnson ER, Leavitt BJ, Maloney CT, Morton
3. Lazar HL. Role of statin therapy in the coronary bypass patient. Ann JR, Olmstead EM, Birkmeyer JD, OConnor GT; Northern New En-
Thorac Surg 2004;78:730e740. gland Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Effect of preoperative
4. Kulik A, Ruel M. Statins and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: aspirin use on mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Ann
preoperative and postoperative efcacy and safety. Expert Opin Drug Thorac Surg 2000;70:1986e1990.
Saf 2009;8:559e571. 17. Bybee KA, Powell BD, Valeti U, Rosales AG, Kopecky SL, Mullany
5. Kulik A, Brookhart MA, Levin R, Ruel M, Solomon DH, Choudhry C, Wright RS. Preoperative aspirin therapy is associated with improved
NK. Impact of statin use on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass
surgery. Circulation 2008;118:1785e1792. grafting. Circulation 2005;112(suppl):I286eI292.
6. The Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect 18. Johnson WD, Kayser KL, Hartz AJ, Saedi SF. Aspirin use and survival
of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and after coronary bypass surgery. Am Heart J 1992;123:603e608.
low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein 19. Fremes SE, Levinton C, Naylor CD, Chen E, Christakis GT, Goldman
coronary artery bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 1997;336:153e162. BS. Optimal antithrombotic therapy following aortocoronary bypass: a
7. Kulik A, Ruel M, Jneid H, Ferguson TB, Hiratzka LF, Ikonomidis JS, meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993;7:169e180.
Lopez-Jiminez F, McNallan SM, Patel M, Roger VL, Sellke FW, Sica 20. Can LH, Kayikcioglu M, Yavuzgil O, Kultursay H, Soydan I. Evalu-
DA, Zimmerman L. Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass ation of hospitalization period and ve-year follow-up of patients
graft surgery: a scientic statement from the American Heart Associ- admitted with acute coronary syndrome following coronary artery
ation. Circulation 2015;131:927e964. bypass graft surgery. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol 2010;38:387e392.
8. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol 21. Brackbill M, Kline VT, Sytsma CS, Call JT. Intervention to increase
Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and the proportion of acute myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass
treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). graft patients receiving an order for aspirin at hospital discharge.
J Am Med Assoc 2001;285:2486e2497. J Manag Care Pharm 2010;16:329e336.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen