Dr.
Romanzi
Dedicated to Your Quality of Life
Home Vaginal Rejuvenation
PAGES
About Dr. Romanzi
Post a question for Dr. R.
LATEST POSTS
Three (Unhappy) Musketeers
– Prolapse, Bladder Outlet
Obstruction and Overactive
Bladder
Ask Dr R: overactive bladder,
interstitial cystitis, and
ulcerative colitis
An obstructed bladder is a
cranky bladder – the story of
prolapse and the badly
behaved bladder
Dr R Talks About Prolapse,
Part 1
Does Betty need
hysterectomy for prolapse?
We think not. Dr R guest
blog on Women’s Voices for
Change
CATEGORIES
Ask Dr. R.
Blog
Breaking News and
Research Reviews
Fistula and Childbirth Injury
Hysterectomy and
Alternatives to Hysterectomy
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Urinary Incontinence
Uterine Prolapse
Vaginal Laxity
Vaginal Prolapse
Vaginal Rejuvenation
ARCHIVES
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
Sex & Health Cosmetic Reconstructive Surgery Press About Us/About You Patient Forms
The Happy Hysterectomy
by admin
(c) Lauri Romanzi, 2010 DR. ROMANZI HOME
DELIVERY
As a relentless advocate for avoiding hysterectomy unless
Enter your email address:
you will truly benefit from the surgical removal of your 
uterus, I am here to share information about the benefits
of  hysterectomy when it’s done for all the right reasons.
Subscribe
Delivered by FeedBurner
My favorite “don’t need a hysterectomy” message is  
about uterine resuspension for treatment of uterine
prolapse, a condition that accounts for about 16% of
benign hysterectomies in the States, being the third most SEARCH
common indication for hysterectomy after fibroids and  To search, type and hit enter
dysfunctional bleeding. Since uterine resuspension
fixes uterine prolapse just as well as hysterectomy-based
BLOGROLL
repairs, there is no need to undergo hysterectomy for
prolapse. Heal India e-Newsletter
Seek Wellness
But what if you’re suffering with a condition for 
Womens Voices for Change
which hysterectomy truly can make a difference?
Is there any such thing as a Happy Hysterectomy? LINKS
Health Guru
JonasWeb – Webmaster
SearchTROOP
Seek Wellness
GOOGLE CONNECT
The Female Pelvis
Fibroids, adenomyosis, dysfunctional bleeding and LOGIN
endometriosis are the biggest players in this “do I or don’t Register
I” hysterectomy arena. Let me help you understand 
Log in
something most of you already intuitively know – one
Entries RSS
woman’s hysterectomy blessing is another woman’s
hysterectomy nightmare. What turned your neighbor’s life Comments RSS
into a happy healthy place might not work so well for you. WordPress.org
According to a  beautifully designed and implemented 
research project recently published in the bible of
gynecologic research, ”Obstetrics and Gynecology”,
whether you’ll celebrate or regret your hysterectomy
depends on how much headache your uterine condition is
causing in terms of pain, painful sex, heavy bleeding,
December 2009 pelvic pressure, and fatigue from the anemia caused by
November 2009 heavy bleeding, combined with how you feel about your
October 2009 uterus, and how you feel about hysterectomy.

August 2009
With the right mix of severe, recalcitrant uterine problems
in the setting of unsuccessful non-hysterectomy therapies, 
and a laissez-faire attitude toward the role of your uterus
in your version of womanhood, a hysterectomy may turn 
out to be best thing you ever did. But when the 
clinical/personal mix leaves you feeling like less of a
woman and wondering why you signed up to remove an
organ that plays a crucial role in your feminine identity,
you may well regret your hysterectomy.

Sometimes the best clinical research just makes a lot of

sense.

The March 2010 issue debuted the Study of Pelvic

Problems, Hysterectomy, and Intervention Alternatives
(SOPHIA).  Taking 10 years to complete, this team of 
researchers from California’s Kaiser Permanente
HealthCare System painstakingly kept track of over 1400
women with benign (non-cancerous) uterine and other
pelvic problems as they decided to undergo hysterectomy,
undergo alternatives to hysterectomy, or decide not to
decide by foregoing treatment in favor of TIME, the
unsung heroine of benign uterine problems. If you can 
hang in there until menopause starts, most likely your
uterus will calm down and the symptoms will … just… 
slowly… stop.

At the beginning of the trial, women were asked how they 
felt about  the

“benefits of not having uterus”

lack of menstruation,
uselessness of uterus once childbearing complete,
no more birth control concerns

the

“value of the uterus ”

sexual function
feeling complete as a woman

and

“hysterectomy concerns”

feeling older
violated
sad about loss of fertility resulting from hysterectomy
Over the ensuing decade, these self-rated attitudes were
compared to symptom impact on each woman’s overall
quality of life and sexual function as she dealt with her
gynecologic disorder.

Guess what they found? Among the women who chose

hysterectomy, those who felt that the benefits of not 
having a uterus outweighed the value of having a uterus
and hysterectomy concerns, or for whom the underlying
condition had major impact on quality of life and sexual
function (pain in daily life, uncontrollable bleeding, painful
sex, constipation, irritable  bowel, overactive bladder, 
urinary incontinence and the like) and for whom non-
hysterectomy therapies did not work who did not want to
wait for natural menpause to but the brakes on the
condition, reported that hysterectomy improved quality of
life in a major and regret-free fashion,  including, when 
applicable, their sex lives.

Women for whom the underlying condition was not

associated with severe impact on quality of life and
sexuality, and who rated the value of having a uterus and
hysterectomy concerns higher than benefits of not
having a uterus were more likely to regret the
hysterectomy.

Over the past 25 years many a gynecologic staple

indication for hysterectomy now comes with non-
hysterectomy options. Conditions include fibroids
(extremely common benign smooth muscle tumors of the
uterus that can make for heavy or irregular periods, pelvic
pressure, colorectal and urinary difficulties, infertility and
enlarged abdomen), adenomyosis (spongy super-
thickening of the lining of the uterus that can cause heavy
and irregular periods), and endometriosis (abnormal
location of uterine lining tissue outside of the uterus itself
where it does not belong, often implanting on the tubes,
ovaries, intestines and other pelvic organs causing pelvic
pain, scarring and infertility). These options 
include hormone suppression with birth control pills or 
hormone-containing IUD (intrauterine contraceptive
device), endometrial ablation using controlled cautery of 
the lining of the uterus so that it doesn’t bleed very much,
(http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000903.htm),
or shrinking fibroids using  uterine artery embolization, a 
radiologic procedure that threads a tube into the uterine
artery through the groin, injecting embolic material that 
blocks bloodflow to the fibroids.
(http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/007384.htm).

So now we’ve got choices, and they often work quite well.
It used to be wait for menopause, take harsh hormones,
(look up Danazol for endometriosis when you have a
chance), clean out the uterus with a D&C, and if none of
that worked, your options were restricted to toughing it
out or hysterectomy.
Besides these new therapies, it is important to understand 
that not every condition needs treating. Mild endometriosis
may never cause a problem short of a tendency to painful
periods, or it can be as brutal as a cancer, socking onto
every organ in the pelvis, ruining your fertility and making
you feel like your belly’s on fire. Fibroids can be cute little
nubbins scattered here and there with nary a clinical
impact, or they can be gigantic super-ball-consistency
uterine tumors the size of your head.  Dysfunctional 
bleedng tack a few extra days on to your period, or it can
be a  hemorrhagic pad-soaking, anemia inducing tsunami
that knocks the wind out of your life every month.

In the SOPHIA trial, of the 1400 women participating fully

for the entire 10 years, only 207 (14.6%) chose
hysterectomy- ”These women were more likely to report
symptomatic fibroids and that they did not want to become
pregnant” at the beginning of the study”. ” Women who
reported higher levels of pelvic problem impact on sex or
who had higher (mental stress) scores were more likely to
choose hysterectomy as were women wtih higher scores
on the “benefits of not having a uterus” scale and lower
scores on teh ‘hsterectomy concerns” scale.  63.9% of 
the 207 women who chose hysterectomy were very
satisfied with the results. but nearly 22% were only  
somewhat satisfied, about 7% were ambivalent, with the
remaining, about 8%, frankly dissatisfied.  The majority of 
women who used uterine artery embolization and
endometrial ablation did not go on to hysterectomy,
highlighting the growing role of these effective, uterine-
preserving operations for conditions traditionally treated 
with hysterectomy.

The authors further state “Perhaps the most noteworthy

are our findings regarding the significant role of women’s
attitudes toward their uterus and hsyterectomy in their
decision making regarding and satisfaction with this
surgery.”, and “We cannot comment, however, on the
extent to which these attitudes were elicited by or shared 
with physicians.”

Here’s the deal, if the condition is benign but truly ruining

your life, and you really like your uterus, find a
gynecologist who shares your perspective, and try the all
appropriate non-hysterectomy therapies. For those of you
who’ve already done everything BUT the hysterectomy,
and the fibroids/bleeding/pain is DRIVING YOU NUTS, a
hysterectomy just might make your life a lot better.
The Aging Ovary

HEADS UP: for most non-medical people, hysterectomy =

remove the uterus and ovaries. The medical definition of
hysterectomy, however, is removal of uterus only, ovaries
LEFT IN PLACE.  Your ovaries make almost all of your 
sex hormones. And even if you’re menopausal, there may
be some good  reasons to leave your ovaries right where
they are until age 75 or so – see

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20226402,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17513923,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16055568.

Really need a hysterectomy?  Make it a happy one, keep 
your ovaries.

I have the privelege of contributing my literature reviews to 
the Journal of Sexual Medicine (JSM). Below you’ll
find my JSM synopsis of the SOPHIA trial:

Predictors of Hysterectomy Use and Satisfaction.

Kuppermann M, Learman LA, Schembri M, Gregorich
SE, Jackson R, Jacoby A, Lewis , Washington AE.
Obstet Gynecol 2010 Mar, 115(3):543-551. This
prospective observational Study of Pelvic Problems,
Hysterectomy, an Intervention Alternatives (SOPHIA)
monitored 1420 women over a 10 year period, to
describe the natural history of the choice to choose or
forego hysterectomy in premenopausal participants with
benign clinical conditions for which hysterectomy was
one management alternative. Baseline evaluation
included pelvic symptom profile, quality of life scoring,
sexual function and hysterectomy and uterus-related
attitudes, in addition to use of Western and alternative
medicine therapies. Hysterectomy and uterus related
attitude evaluation included “benefits of not having
uterus” (lack of menstruation, uselessness of uterus
once childbearing complete, no more birth control
concerns), “value of uterus (sexual function and feeling
complete as a woman) and “hysterectomy
concerns” (feeling older, violated, and sad about loss of
fertility resulting from hysterectomy). Participants were
English, Spanish or Chinese speaking women ages 31-
54 at enrollment in trial. Over the 10 year period, 207
(14.6%) underwent hysterectomy, some of whom
received up to 8 years of follow-up before end of trial.
Approximately 64% of these hysterectomy women were
very satisfied, with ~22% somewhat satisfied, and the
remaining 15-16% neither satisfied or unsatisfied, ~7%
of whom were dissatisfied to varying degrees. Women
satisfied with hysterectomy had higher QOL and / or
 sexual function impact from the condition for which
hysterectomy was performed, in addition to higher
scores on the “benefits of not having a uterus” and lower
scores on the “value of having a uterus” and
“hysterectomy concerns” questions. The authors
describe a greater likelihood to undergo and be satisfied
with the outcome hysterectomy in women reporting
greater pelvic problem impact on sexual function and
pelvic problems overall, underscoring “the importance of
determining the extent to which symptoms interfere with
QOL and sexual function when counseling patients about
hysterectomy and its outcomes”. The majority of women
who underwent alternative therapies such as endometrial
ablation and uterine artery embolization, did not go on to
hysterectomy. The data clearly demonstrate the
conclusion that “women’s attitudes toward their uterus
and hysterectomy play a primary role in the decision to
undergo and personal satisfaction with the outcome of
hysterectomy” for benign conditions. Level of Evidence:
IIa

Share:

1 comment

TAMMY MICHAEL { 06.13.10 at 8:05 am } 1

INTERESTING ARTICLE DR. ROMANZI! I WISH I DIDN’T

RUSH INTO MY HYSTERECTOMY, I DID THE D&C
FIRST, IT DIDN’T WORK, I ALSO THOUGHT I WAS
GOING TO LEAVE THIS EARTH WITH MY UTERUS, IT
WAS A WOMEN THING WITH ME. SO HERE I AM 4
YRS. LATER, HAVING PROBLEMS BECAUSE OF
HYTERECTOMY THAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE
BETTER. I AM GLAD I KEPT MY OVERIES AND
CERVIX, HAIL TO THE CERVIX! HAIL TO THE CERVIX!

Leave a Comment

Name

E-mail

Website

Submit
CAPTCHA Code

© 2007-2009 Urogynics. All rights reserved.