SUBMISSION FILE(S) FORMATS

All submissions MUST be sent to the Editor by email.

No hard copy submission papers will be accepted. A format which best preserves the "document
look" is preferred.

Files types submitted are of two primary types: Main Manuscript and Artwork files. See below for
acceptable submission files types.

Link all files from the Main Manuscript and embed the graphics in this document. Also, ALL files
should be sent separately with names matching those in the Main Manuscript. Do NOT submit
compressed files.

--Main Manuscript (primary submission document)

Submit your manuscript in WORD FORMAT - Microsoft Word (.doc / .docx ) (See Sample Article)

Do not use any word processing options/tools, such as--strike through, hidden text, comments,
merges, and so forth. Due to the academic focus of this publication, the use of personal pronoun
(I, we, etc.) and present tense is strongly discouraged.

--Artwork (Tables, Figures, Appendices, & Videos)

Tables All tables (i.e., data displayed in rows and columns) must be submitted either
in HTML format or as MS Word tables embedded in the manuscript near the first reference to the
corresponding table.Tables MUST be no wider than 500 pixels (5.25"). Lengthy tables are
discouraged as they are difficult to read online.

Figures Figure graphics (e.g., charts, graphs, photographs, and drawings) must be in
either .GIF,.PNG, or .JPG format, attached to the electronic file. Filenames for figures must be
clearly labeled as Figure 1, Figure 2, etc., at the bottom of the figure, left justified, numbered in
sequence, and must be referenced within the text of the article.

ALT tags will be applied to all graphics. The default tag will be the figure caption supplied by the
author. Authors should provide tag text for any graphics used as links to audio or videos.

Appendices All supplemental text not falling under the definition of a table or figure will be
considered an appendix. Appendices should be placed at the end of the manuscript, after the
reference list. If possible, authors should provide a link from the reference to the appendix in the
manuscript (e.g., see Appendix A) to the beginning of the actual appendix.

Videos All videos must be submitted as RealMedia (.RM) (formatted files, optimized for Web use
(see note following this paragraph). (Flash animations should also be converted to .RM format.)
Videos should be identified in the text as Video 1, Video 2, etc., and video filenames should
include the corresponding video numbers. Authors must provide a link to the video within the
article. This link could be a text link (e.g., Video 1) or a still frame from the video (i.e., a .GIF,
.PNG or .JPG file).

Audio files Audio files must be submitted as RealMedia (.RM) formatted files (see note just
preceding this paragraph). Audio files should be identified in the text as Audio 1, Audio 2, etc.,
and audio filenames should include the corresponding audio numbers. Authors must provide a link
to the audio within the article. This link could be a text link (e.g., Audio 1) or a related graphic.

NOTE: For assistance with video and audio compression into multiple formats, Media Cleaner is
one industry leader you may find helpful.

GENERAL GUIDELINES

Material must be original, reflect the integrity expected of scholarly communication, and
demonstrate a coherence and unity that makes the paper both understandable and interesting.
Before submitting an article, please review the following suggestions. Original manuscripts
received in correct form serve to expedite the review process, others will be returned to author.
Spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, and the mechanical elements of arrangements, spacing,
length, and consistency of usage in form and descriptions should be studied before submission.

--Length

Because this is an electronic journal the length of papers may vary. The length of your paper
should be appropriate to the topic and focus. We will accept some papers that are only two or
three pages long and some that are as long as 40 or 50 pages. The critical issue is whether the
length is appropriate.

--Originality

All manuscripts must be original. No manuscript will be considered which has already been
published or is being considered by another magazine or journal. However, if work described in
conference proceedings is substantially revised and extended, it will be considered. Submission of
a manuscript represents certification by the author that the article is not being considered nor has
been published elsewhere.

--Handling of Manuscripts

All manuscripts are acknowledged upon receipt via email. Review is carried out as promptly as
possible. The manuscript will be reviewed by at least two members of the Editorial Review Board,
which takes usually no more than eight weeks. When a decision for publication or rejection is
made, the first author or author designated to receive correspondence is notified.
--Title Sheet

Do NOT include a title sheet. Manuscripts are blind reviewed so there should be no indication of
the author(s) name on the pages..

AUTHOR 1*, AUTHOR 2**, AUTHOR 3***

Common Contact Information*
first author private contact information (if there is) *
second author private contact information (if there is) **
third author private contact information (if there is)***

--Abstract

Each article should include an informative, comprehensive abstract of 75 to 200 words. This
abstract should succinctly summarize the major points of the paper, and the author's summary
and/or conclusions. For article in Bahasa Melayu, the abstract must be written in English.

--Mechanical Requirements

Because this is an electronic journal the length of papers may vary. The length of your paper
should be appropriate to the topic and focus. We will accept some papers that are only two or
three pages long and some that are as long as 40 or 50 pages. The critical issue is whether the
length is appropriate.

--Credits and Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments or appreciation to individuals for assistance with the manuscript or with the
material reported should be included in the Acknowledgment at the end of the article.

--References

Authors are responsible for checking the accuracy of all references and that all references cited in
the text also appear in the Reference section. All references should be in alphabetical order by
author (unnumbered) American Psychological Association (APA) style. Citation examples (1) book
and (2) periodical:

man, Aytekin. (1997). Distance Education: A guide for learners and teachers. Ankara:
Association Press.

man, G.Y. (1998). Student Perceptions on Distance Education. Distance Education, 8(1), 7-
22.
--Citing Electronic Media

The following forms for citing on-line sources are taken from the APA Publication Guidelines,
Appendix 3-A, Section I (pp. 218-222). Please see the APA manual for additional information on
formatting electronic media. A block quote must be a minimum of 40 words or four lines, single
spaced (not 20 and double spaced as is presently noted). In citations, et al., can only be used after
all authors have been cited or referenced. As per APA all citations must match the reference list
and vice versa. A maximum of 40 references is recommended.

Elements of references to on-line information

Author, I. (date). Title of article. Name of Periodical [On-line], xx. Available: Specify path

Author, I., & Author, I. (date). Title of chapter. In Title of full work [On-line]. Available: Specify path

Author, I., Author, I., & Author, I. (date). Title of full work [On-line]. Available: Specify path

The date element should indicate the year of publication or, if the source undergoes regular
revision, the most recent update; if a date cannot be determined, provide an exact date of your
search. (p. 219)

An availability statement replaces the location and name of a publisher typically provided for text
references. Provide information sufficient to retrieve the material. For example, for material that is
widely available on networks, specify the method used to find the material, such as the protocol
(Telnet, FTP, Internet, etc.), the directory, and the file name. (p. 219)

Other Electronic Media

Author, I. (Version number) [CD-ROM]. (date). Location of producer/distributor: Name of

producer/distributor.

Author, I. (date). Title of article [CD-ROM]. Title of Journal, xx, xxx-xxx. Abstract from: Source and
tretrieval number

Author, I. (date). Name of Software (Version number) [Computer software]. Location of Location of
producer/distributor: Name of producer/distributor.

After the title of the work, insert in brackets as part of the title element (i.e., before the period) the
type of medium for the material (current examples include CD-ROM, Electronic data tape, cartridge
tape, and computer program). (p. 220)

Include the location and name of the producer and distributor if citing an entire bibliographic
database. (p. 220)

--URLs

Authors may provide links to interactive media or files containing animation, sound, and images
that will help readers better understand and envision the concepts authors are trying to express
(see Multimedia Guidelines). Authors may include up to 15 non-reference URLs for sites of interest
to readers.
 NOTE: Do not include the author name(s) and information in the initial submission. All reviews
are blind. After acceptance, prior to the deadline, your final version will be returned to you and
you can include this section.

A4 Page with 2.5 cm margins all over

No page numbers
No header or footer or notes
Calibri font should be used
Title: 12 point font, The rest of the document: 10 point
All main titles are capitalized
Single Spacing (with no special issues)
Tables and figures are centered
The rest of the format as shown in the following sample

*See sample below

 SAMPLE
GENDERED VOICES: PROVOCATEUR IN AN ON-LINE VIRTUAL CONFERENCE COURSE FOR IN-
SERVICE TEACHERS

Sherry MARKEL
Center for Excellence in Education
Northern Arizona University
United States
sherry.markel@nau.edu

ABSTRACT

This paper is a report on the findings of a study conducted on a graduate level virtual conference summer
school course. Discourse analysis techniques were used to examine the resulting transcript of texts for
evidence of a democratic discourse within a community of learners. Findings indicate that gender is not
masked in the text driven discussions on the Internet. Distinctive discursive styles are often sex class linked.
Like face to face or classroom contexts, status is accorded unequally within discourse communities. Participants
are not equal and are not equally attended or responded to. Educators need to take a serious and wary
approach to accepting claims of ensured democratic participation in computer mediated communication
formatted classes.

INTRODUCTION

Classroom discourse has been recognized as important to the educational experience of students.
Speech makes available to reflection the processes by which they [students] relate new knowledge to old. But
this possibility depends on the social relationships, the communication system, which the teacher sets up
(Cazden, 1986, p. 432). Vygotskian concepts concerning semiotics and the mediation of higher mental
functioning by tools and signs (including speech and language) have been used by cognitive scientists and
educational researchers (Bruner,1990, Wertsch, in Moll, 1990) to study the intimate relationships between
discourse and learning. Vygotsky was concerned with how the forms of discourse encountered in the social
institution of formal schooling provide the underlying framework within which concept development occurs
(Wertsch, 1990, p.116). New concepts of classrooms and formal schooling have come of age with the advent of
the use of the Internet and virtual conference forums and seminars. New forms of discourse are taking place
within these virtual classrooms. Computer mediated communication involves electronic discourse. This is a
written form of communication that reads like speech acts of conversation. Davis and Brewer (1997) have
referred to this quality as writing talking.

Computer mediated communication is different from face-to-face conversations in important ways.

Participation is asynchronous and often there is a time lag between the initial posting of a message and the
responses it generates. Interactivity can be delayed by minutes, hours, days. Every participant has equal
access to the conversational floor and turn taking is never an issue. Software formats delineate each
participants contribution as a separate entity and it is listed in the order received. Speakers within these
conversations are not able to talk over or interrupt another. Participants are able to refer back to previous
speech acts within a discussion thread in ways that face-to-face experiences never afford. Conversations are
scripts that are archived and saved as transcripts. Claims have been made that the electronic medium
exercises a democratizing influence on communication (Herring, 1992, p.250). This claim is the focus of this
study.

If opportunities to engage in reflection and conversations are opportunities for learning, it is vitally
important to be aware of the patterns of discourse being used in this new medium of communication. Is it
really true that there is more equality of participation in discussions and with the lack of nonverbal status cues
are these electronic forums classrooms where power and control do not mirror societys status quo?
THE STUDY

Electronic discourse within computer mediated virtual courses supports conversations of practice and
learning. There are performance features within these conversations that can be studied using the same focal
lenses used to examine face-to-face conversations. Conversations have negotiated meanings and values in
either context. Is there a dominant speaker, one who contributes the most text, introduces the highest number
of topics, receives the most number of directed speech acts? What are the frames (Tannen, 1996) set within
the conversations? How do the participants position themselves within the conversation, within the discussion
group? Are particular stances sex class (Tannen, 1996) linked? Are there participants who are not listened or
attended to?

Transcripts were collected from a graduate level virtual conference seminar course taught during
summer session, 1998 at Northern Arizona University. Participants were in-service classroom teachers. A
kindergarten through high school grade range of classroom assignments was represented by these teachers.
Course work included outside class reading assignments of selected current research in the field, a final
research paper, and active participation in the on-line discussion forum with focus questions by the instructor.
The seminar offered was a Tools for Teachers course designed to promote reflective practice. Seven teachers
from four different communities participated in this pilot course during the summer of 1998. Five of the
participants were female and two were males. An interactional sociolinguistics (Schiffrin, 1995) approach was
used to examine the texts of conversations. This approach draws upon concepts of culture, society, language,
and the self. The meaning, structure, and use of language is socially and culturally relative (Gumperz, 1982).
Meaning in dialog, like that of conversation, is socially constructed. Data was also examined for evidence of
micro displays of sex class linked gender identities; displays that are commonly associated specifically with
either gender. An example of this is the use of tag questions. Female participants, much more so than males,
tend to use tag questions as a discourse strategy to invite response and inclusion or solidarity within the group.
(Tannen, 1994) Simple quantitative analysis was done to determine total lines of text generated by each
participant, amount of participation, total sums of questions, statements, as well as number of directed
responses sent and received. Patterns of participation were mapped/graphed and correlated to the contexts of
interactions. Style, register, and voice or tone analysis were also used on the data sets to try to discover the
dynamics among the participants.

FINDINGS

C___ [male], I hope Im doing this right. I thought your observations were right on target.
I subbed for high school and jr. high classes. High school was the best. I definitely felt the kids
were on my level. They either took repsonibility (sic) or they didnt. How neat to have such a
small class, but more importantly to know the parents as well as you do. . How does that work
where youre at? Do the kids have problems that need home visits or is it even necessary in such
a small town? [S]

This example of a speech act from the summer school course illustrates the hedging, expressions of
support and appreciation, and use of directed questions to elicit a response described by Herring (1996) as a
Supportive/Attenuated style. This is a communicative style sex class linked with female participants. S has been
teaching for over 15 years in elementary classrooms. She links some of her experiences with this beginning high
school teacher. It is no accident that this just happens to be a male participant. The speech act was written
during the second week of a five week course. C had joined the course the second week. S was responding to
his first posting. Note that her beginning sentence sets a tentative tone I hope Im doing this right. that
tempers her statements concerning her own experiences. She encourages C twice concerning his observations
and knowing his students parents well. She further empowers and encourages C by asking two direct
questions, inviting C to talk more about his experience.

Contrast Ss speech act with the following from D, a male middle school teacher who has been teaching
for two years.

I tried something different, I read the remarks first and will reply, then I will read the
assignments. Since M [female] is the only one who has responded so far, here goes. M, I agree
that schools who supported reforms, who have teachers collaborating and are used to
 restructuring are more successful. However, as we have already discussed, the changes and
reforms need to be bottom up and not top down. In C. county we have district curriculum, but
it includes so much that practically every teacher except the newbies know that they cant
possibly cover everything in most of them. Instead, they pick and choose those they feel are
most important and cover them. Now the district (top down) is mandating benchmarks for
departments. These are designed to put every class at the same point at the end of each quarter
or semester, since ____ has such a transient population. That way each student can receive the
same material no matter where they are. In theory it sound (sic) great but it doesnt give
teachers the flexibility to teach to the students according to their needs. It also varies greatly by
the so called curriculum specialists who are supposed to be leading the effort. Some curricular
areas are nothing more than dictatorships, telling teachers what they will be doing. Others, such
as my math curriculum specialists, have given total freedom to our teachers to design our own
benchmarks. so I guess my point is that standards, benchmarks, or curriculum guides can be
very benificial (sic) if teachers have direct input into the documents. If not, theyre likely not
worth the paper they are printed on. [D]

This is one of Ds shortest speech acts. The register is a little formal, a little distant and the tone intent is
that of a lecture. He has directed this speech act at M, an experienced middle school teacher. The initial
construction, M, I agree reads as if it might be the beginning of a supportive communication like Ss to C.
Reading on reveals the true nature of the communication. It is an opportunity for D to display his knowledge
and opinions in neutral, informative style that slips into the use of sarcasm when referring to so called
curriculum specialists. Herring (1996) posits that this is a male voice. D does use three modifiers. I tried in
the first sentence and here goes in the second sentence. The last modifier is in the second to last sentence
when he writes, so I guess my point... Each of these modifiers serves to soften the tone of authority that
underwrites this communication. This sample is very typical of this participant in tone and style.

Looking at the data quantitatively, D contributed 32% of the lines of the seminar transcripts. There were
1,420 lines of communication and D wrote 450 of these. The next closest in number was S who contributed
314 lines. These results are similar for the number of speech acts. D had the highest number with 18. S and K
(female) tied for second highest with 15. With this analysis alone, it might not be safe to say that D dominated
the discourse. Further analysis of who received directed responses and who sent directed responses revealed
an interesting pattern, see [Table 1].

D was clearly the most active participant, the most verbal text contributor and he was the participant
who received the most directed responses. Initial speculations looking at the study data were that the females
who used active discourse strategies to solicit responses and engagement by other participants would receive
more directed responses. This did not turn out to be the case. K (female) sent 36 directed responses, the
highest number of the seminar. She only received 12 directed responses in return. The most disturbing of all
data was Ds (female) who sent 4 directed responses and received none. Ds participated the least, only 43 lines
of text. The following is a representative example of Dss discourse style.

Wow what a good article, I personally use (sic) to read. I read a lot, I mean an inch or two
thickness of books. Now, I have been molded into the student teacher So lately, Ive read for
credit, now I need to get back into read just to read.

I think that the video club idea, about teachers seeing each other teach is interesting. I could see a lot of
attitute (sic) come up in a situation like that. But I think that everyone would need to respond professionally
and always have a good intent. I know that we have been told of something about ourselves that we do and
are unaware of. . This is a nice program, and I hope there is something out there for Music teachers. We are
constantly decided (sic) on what pieces to buy, a similar discussion on music would be neat. If you know of any
let me know

Ds had just finished her student teaching and so was the lowest status of the group as far as teaching
experience. She alerts the seminar group to her status in this communication. Ds is a Native American for
whom English is a second language. None of the participants responded to Ds. The important questions here
concern why Dss participation was marginalized. Her participation was not attended to, not responded to.
Was this because of her writing or grammatical style? Was it because of her tentative comments such as nice
program? She is the only member of the seminar to use an emoticon which has been sex class linked to
females. It is highly likely that her gender, her ethnicity and her lack of experience as a teacher all were
communicated through her text based communication and conspired against her. Ds was not seen as a
competent participant in the discussions. Ds did not participate actively in the on-line seminar. The lack of
response was surely discouraging.

Table 1: Mapping the number of directed responses received by each participant each week. G represents the
total group. A number of responses were directed to the group as a whole.

Group Participant
xxxx 1
xxx 2
xx 3

K was an experienced participant in on-line discussion groups. She was a member of a state-wide
program funded with an NSF grant that maintained a discussion forum with teachers across the state. She is
the participant that sent out 36 directed responses and only received 12 directed back at her in return. If
linguistic/technological competence is not the issue here, what were the dynamics that determined if a
participant was read and responded to?

Further examination of Ds speech act communications reveal a style of Absolute. D always made
statements in a tone of challenge.

Example Yet the public continues to believe that it is the students, teachers, and school who
are failing. Once again, I will return to the idea of Obsolete. We are not failing, the system is
obsolete!!!

On the first couple of passes through the data I had missed the significance of the style. D was not only
holding court and lecturing throughout the whole seminar, he was also inviting participation and response from
others by being a provocateur with his strong, emphatic stances. The female participants explicitly asked for
responses with direct questions while this male individual invited response with challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Ds linguistic strategies were the most successful in this seminar. This is not the equal, level playing field
that some champions of the technology have promised. The discursive style which incorporated stances of the
provocateur marginalized Dss contributions. Ds did not have a repertoire of strategies to discourse
successfully with D.

D never directed a response to the only other male in the seminar. D was clearly performing his
linguistic routines for the ladies of the seminar. Did this also marginalize C who was the second lowest
contributor in the seminar? Was this the dynamic that interfered with Ks attempts to solicit response? Is this
the linguistic display of a high status male that the female members of this seminar responded to? How could K
as a female member of this linguistic community successfully compete?

8=,Are there linguistically competent strategies that we should be teaching our students enrolled in
virtual conference, web based courses? At the very least, we need not perpetuate the myth that all Internet
communications and virtual participants are treated equally. They are not. Nor are their genders or linguistic
indicators of social status masked. As educators using the new technologies to extend and promote learning
opportunities for more and more students, we must provide some kind of scaffolding and protection for
students like Ds who do not bring the same cultural contexts or linguistic experiences to the virtual conference
table. Rather than a democratic appearing free-for-all that can lead to unequal power for participants like D,
an experienced male provocateur, we should be setting up some explicit expectations and rules for
participation in on-line discussions. The next virtual conference course will have a requirement that every
participant in a discussion group must respond to all members of that same group within a two week time
period. After careful analysis of the transcripts from this virtual conference seminar, it is apparent that equal
participation on-line requires careful support and planning with some rules concerning attending and
responding to other participants.

REFERENCES

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cazden, C. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching
(pp.432-463). NY:MacMillan.

Davis, B.H & Brewer, J.P. (1997). Electronic discourse: Linguistic individuals in virtual space. NY: SUNY.

Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University

Herring, S. (1996). Posting in a different voice. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-
mediated communication (pp. 115-145). NY:SUNY.

Herring, S., Johnson, D., & DiBenedetto, T. (1992). Participation in electronic discourse in a feminist
field. In M. Bucholtz, K. Hall, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley
women and language conference (pp.250-62). Berkeley,CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

Schiffrin, D. (1995). Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5. NY: Avon Books

Wertsch, J. (1990). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In L.C. Moll (Ed.),
Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp.111-126).
Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.