Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

Benazir Bhutto's Assassination and What Really Happened

"New suspicions surround Bhutto death over autopsy, cause of death"http://www.wh


atreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_pakistan.html
"Despite official reports by Pakistan's interior ministry claiming that the gove
rnment had intercepted congratulatory messages sent by al Qaeda surrounding the
assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, a motley of strange occur
rences has sparked new suspicion of the government's official story.
On Friday, doctors at Rawalpindi General Hospital, where she died, said that Bhu
tto had been killed by shrapnel to the head from an explosion, not by two bullet
s that Bhutto supporters cited in the aftermath of the attack.
The government soon changed their story, saying she'd been killed by hitting the
sunroof of her LandCruiser after she'd stood up to wave to a crowd. Doctors sai
d there were no bullet marks on the former prime minister's body, and released a
limited x-ray of what they said was her skull.
More alarming, however, to Bhutto supporters was the fact no autopsy was conduct
ed prior to burial. The official line -- according to Pakistan's interim prime m
inister Mohammadmian Soomro -- was that Bhutto's husband had insisted no autopsy
be performed.
But according to veteran lawyer Athar Minallah who spoke to McClatchy Newspapers
Friday, "an autopsy is mandatory under Pakistan's criminal law in a case of thi
s nature."
"It is absurd, because without autopsy it is not possible to investigate," Minal
lah told McClatchy's Saeed Shah and Warren Strobel in a little publicized piece.
"Is the state not interested in reaching the perpetrators of this heinous crime
or there was a cover-up?"
According to the reporters, "the scene of the attack also was watered down with
a high-pressure hose within an hour, washing away evidence."
Pakistan indicated Saturday it would delay January elections because of turmoil
caused by Bhutto's death. Protests and looting have left at least 38 people dead
."
"No autopsy and evidence wiped clean off the streets. If Musharraf and his croni
es are not guilty, they certainly did a good job of acting like it by disposing
of the evidence ASAP.
And by the way, did anyone actually talk to the husband to validate that he insi
sted there be no autopsy?
Didn't think so." -- Mike Rivero of What Really Happened
"How Benazir Bhutto died
"Conflicting reports about the death of political leader Benazir Bhutto have peo
ple wondering about the Pakistani equivalent of a second gunman on the grassy kn
oll."
Because Pakistanis are not idiots!
" Asia" href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article3291600.ece" targe
t="_blank">They don't blame al-Qa'ida. They blame Musharraf"
"Weird, isn't it, how swiftly the narrative is laid down for us. Benazir Bhutto,
the courageous leader of the Pakistan People's Party, is assassinated in Rawalp
indi – attached to the very capital of Islamabad wherein ex-General Pervez Musha
rraf lives – and we are told by George Bush that her murderers were "extremists"
and "terrorists". Well, you can't dispute that.
But the implication of the Bush comment was that Islamists were behind the assas
sination. It was the Taliban madmen again, the al-Qa'ida spider who struck at th
is lone and brave woman who had dared to call for democracy in her country.
Of course, given the childish coverage of this appalling tragedy – and however c
orrupt Ms Bhutto may have been, let us be under no illusions that this brave lad
y is indeed a true martyr – it's not surprising that the "good-versus-evil" donk
ey can be trotted out to explain the carnage in Rawalpindi.
Who would have imagined, watching the BBC or CNN on Thursday, that her two broth
ers, Murtaza and Shahnawaz, hijacked a Pakistani airliner in 1981 and flew it to
Kabul where Murtaza demanded the release of political prisoners in Pakistan. He
re, a military officer on the plane was murdered. There were Americans aboard th
e flight – which is probably why the prisoners were indeed released....
.... But back to the official narrative. George Bush announced on Thursday he wa
s "looking forward" to talking to his old friend Musharraf. Of course, they woul
d talk about Benazir. They certainly would not talk about the fact that Musharra
f continues to protect his old acquaintance – a certain Mr Khan – who supplied a
ll Pakistan's nuclear secrets to Libya and Iran. No, let's not bring that bit of
the "axis of evil" into this.
So, of course, we were asked to concentrate once more on all those " extremists"
and "terrorists", not on the logic of questioning which many Pakistanis were fe
eling their way through in the aftermath of Benazir's assassination.
It doesn't, after all, take much to comprehend that the hated elections looming
over Musharraf would probably be postponed indefinitely if his principal politic
al opponent happened to be liquidated before polling day.
So let's run through this logic in the way that Inspector Ian Blair might have d
one in his policeman's notebook before he became the top cop in London.
Question: Who forced Benazir Bhutto to stay in London and tried to prevent her r
eturn to Pakistan? Answer: General Musharraf.
Question: Who ordered the arrest of thousands of Benazir's supporters this month
? Answer: General Musharraf.
Question: Who placed Benazir under temporary house arrest this month? Answer: Ge
neral Musharraf.
Question: Who declared martial law this month? Answer General Musharraf.
Question: who killed Benazir Bhutto?
Er. Yes. Well quite.
You see the problem? Yesterday, our television warriors informed us the PPP memb
ers shouting that Musharraf was a "murderer" were complaining he had not provide
d sufficient security for Benazir. Wrong. They were shouting this because they b
elieve he killed her."
"Anglo-American Ambitions behind the Assassination of Benazir Bhutto and the Des
tabilization of Pakistan
by Larry Chin
Global Research, December 29, 2007
It has been known for months that the Bush-Cheney administration and its allies
have been manuevering to strengthen their political control of Pakistan, paving
the way for the expansion and deepening of the “war on terrorism” across the reg
ion. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto does not change this agenda. In fact, i
t simplifies Bush-Cheney’s options.
Seeding chaos with a pretext
“Delivering democracy to the Muslim world” has been the Orwellian rhetoric used
to mask Bush-Cheney’s application of pressure and force, its dramatic attempt at
reshaping of the Pakistani government (into a joint Bhutto/Sharif-Musharraf) co
alition, and backdoor plans for a military intervention. Various American destab
ilization plans, known for months by officials and analysts, proposed the toppli
ng of Pakistan s military.
The assassination of Bhutto appears to have been anticipated. There were even re
ports of “chatter” among US officials about the possible assassinations of eithe
r Pervez Musharraf or Benazir Bhutto, well before the actual attempts took place
.
As succinctly summarized in Jeremy Page’s article, "Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? T
he Main Suspects", the main suspects are 1) “Pakistani and foreign Islamist mili
tants who saw her as a heretic and an American stooge”, and 2) the Inter-Service
s Intelligence, or ISI, a virtual branch of the CIA. Bhutto’s husband Asif Ali Z
ardari directly accused the ISI of being involved in the October attack.
The assassination of Bhutto has predictably been blamed on “Al-Qaeda”, without m
ention of fact that Al-Qaeda itself is an Anglo-American military-intelligence o
peration.
Page’s piece was one of the first to name the man who has now been tagged as the
main suspect: Baitullah Mehsud, a purported Taliban militant fighting the Pakis
tani army out of Waziristan. Conflicting reports link Mehsud to “Al-Qaeda”, the
Afghan Taliban, and Mullah Omar (also see here). Other analysis links him to the
terrorist A.Q. Khan.
Mehsud’s profile, and the reporting of it, echoes the propaganda treatment of al
l post-9/11 “terrorists”. This in turn raises familiar questions about Anglo-Ame
rican intelligence agency propaganda involvement. Is Mehsud connected to the ISI
or the CIA? What did the ISI and the CIA know about Mehsud? More importantly, d
oes Mehsud, or the manipulation of the propaganda surrounding him provide Bush-C
heney with a pretext for future aggression in the region?
Classic “war on terrorism” propaganda
While details on the Bhutto assassination continue to unfold, what is clear is t
hat it was a political hit, along the lines of US agent Rafik Harriri in Lebanon
. Like the highly suspicious Harriri hit, the Bhutto assassination has been depi
cted by corporate media as the martyring of a great messenger of western-style “
democracy”. Meanwhile, the US government’s ruthless actions behind the scenes ha
ve received scant attention.
The December 28, 2007 New York Times coverage of the Bhutto assassination offers
the perfect example of mainstream Orwellian media distortion that hides the tru
th about Bush/Cheney agenda behind blatant propaganda smoke. This piece echoes W
hite House rhetoric proclaiming that Bush’s main objectives are to “bring democr
acy to the Muslim world” and “force out Islamist militants”.
In fact, the openly criminal Bush-Cheney administration has only supported and p
romoted the antithesis of democracy: chaos, fascism, and the installation of Ang
lo-American-friendly puppet regimes.
In fact, the central and consistent geostrategy of Bush-Cheney, and their elite
counterparts around the world, is the continued imposition and expansion of the
manufactured “war on terrorism”; the continuation of war across the Eurasian sub
continent, with events triggered by false flag operations and manufactured prete
xts.
In fact, the main tools used in the “war on terrorism” remain Islamist militants
, working on behalf of Anglo-American military intelligence agencies---among the
m, “Al-Qaeda”, and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, the ISI. Mehsud fits
this the same profile.
Saving Bush-Cheney’s Pakistan
In an amusing quote from the same New York Times piece, Wendy Chamberlain, forme
r US ambassador to Pakistan (and a central figure behind multinational efforts t
o build a trans-Afghan pipeline, connected to 9/11), proudly states: “We are a p
layer in the Pakistani political system”.
Not only has the US continued to be a “player”, but one of its top managers for
decades.
Each successive Pakistani leader since the early 1990s---Bhutto, Sharif and Mush
arraf---have bowed to Western interests. The ISI is a virtual branch of the CIA.
While Musharraf has been, and remains, a strongman for Bush-Cheney, questions ab
out his “reliability”, and control---both his regime’s control over the populace
and growing popular unrest, and elite control over his regime---have driven Bus
h-Cheney attempts to force a clumsy (pro-US, Iraq-style) power-sharing governmen
t. As noted by Robert Scheer, Bush-Cheney has been playing “Russian roulette” wi
th Musharraf, Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif---each of whom have been deeply corrupt, w
illing fronts for the US.
The return of both Bhutto and the other former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has m
erely been an attempt by the US to hedge its regional power bets.
What exactly were John Negroponte and Condoleeza Rice really setting up the past
few months?
Who benefits from Bhutto’s murder?
The “war on terrorism” geostrategy and propaganda milieu, the blueprint that has
been used by elite interests since 9/11 to impose a continuing world war, is th
e clear beneficiary of the Bhutto assassination. Bush/Cheney and their equally c
omplicit pro-war/pro-occupation counterparts in the Democratic Party enthusiasti
cally support the routine use of “terror” pretexts to impose continued war polic
ies.
True to form, fear, “terrorism”, “security” and military force, are once again,
the focuses of Washington political rhetoric, and the around-the-clock media bar
rage.
The 2008 US presidential candidates and their elite campaign advisers, all but a
few of whom enthusiastically support the “war on terrorism”, have taken turns p
ushing their respective versions of “we must stop the terrorists” rhetoric for b
rain-addled supporters. The candidates whose polls have slipped, led by 9/11 par
ticipant and opportunist Rudy Guiliani, and hawkish neoliberal Hillary Clinton,
have already benefited from a new round of mass fear.
Musharraf benefits from the removal of a bitter rival, but now must find a way t
o re-establish order. Musharraf now has an ideal justification to crack down on
“terrorists” and impose full martial law, with Bush-Cheney working from the shad
ows behind Musharraf---and continuing to manipulate or remove his apparatus, if
Musharraf proves too unreliable or broken to suit Anglo-American plans.
The likely involvement of the ISI behind the Bhutto hit cannot be overstated. IS
I’s role behind every major act of “terrorism” since 9/11 remains the central un
spoken truth behind current geopolitical realities. Bhutto, but not Sharif or Mu
sharraf would have threatened the ISI’s agendas.
Bhutto, militant Islam, and the pipelines
Now that she has been martyred, many unflattering historical facts about Benazir
Bhutto will be hidden or forgotten.
Bhutto herself was intimately involved in the creation of the very “terror” mili
eu purportedly responsible for her assassination. Across her political career, s
he supported militant Islamists, the Taliban, the ISI, and the ambitions of West
ern governments.
As noted by Michel Chossudovsky in America’s “War on Terrorism”, it was during B
hutto’s second term that Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) and the Taliban rose to p
rominence, welcomed into Bhutto’s coalition government. It was at that point tha
t ties between the JUI, the Army and the ISI were established.
While Bhutto’s relationship with both the ISI and the Taliban were marked by tur
moil, it is clear that Bhutto, when in power, supported both---and enthusiastica
lly supported Anglo-American interventions.
In his two landmark books, Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Ce
ntral Asia and Jihad: The Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia, Ahmed Rashid r
ichly details the Bhutto regime’s connections to the ISI, the Taliban, “militant
Islam”, multinational oil interests, and Anglo-American officials and intellige
nce proxies.
In Jihad, Rashid wrote:
“Ironically it was not the ISI but Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, the most liber
al, secular leader in Pakistan’s recent history, who delivered the coup de grace
to a new relationship with Central Asia. Rather than support a wider peace proc
ess in Afghanistan that would have opened up a wider peace process in Afghanista
n, Bhutto backed the Taliban, in a rash and presumptuous policy to create a new
western-oriented trade and pipeline route from Turkmenistan through southern Afg
hanistan to Pakistan, from which the Taliban would provide security. The ISI soo
n supported this policy because its Afghan protégé Gulbuddin Hekmatyar had made
no headway in capturing Kabul, and the Taliban appeared to be strong enough to d
o so.”
In Taliban, Rashid provided even more historical detail:
“When Bhutto was elected as Prime Minister in 1993, she was keen to open a route
to Central Asia. A new proposal emerged backed strongly by the frustrated Pakis
tani transport and smuggling mafia, the JUI and Pashtun military and political o
fficials.”
“The Bhutto government fully backed the Taliban, but the ISI remained skeptical
of their abilities, convinced that they would remain a useful but peripheral for
ce in the south.”
“The US congress had authorized a covert $20 million budget for the CIA to desta
bilize Iran, and Tehran accused Washington of funneling some of these funds to t
he Taliban---a charge that was always denied by Washington . Bhutto sent several
emissaries to Washington to urge the US to intervene more publicly on the side
of Pakistan and the Taliban.”
Bhutto’s one mistake: she vehemently supported the pipeline proposed by Argentin
ian oil company Bridas, and opposed the pipeline by Unocal (favored by the US).
This contributed to her ouster in 1996, and the return of Nawaz Sharif to power.
As noted by Rashid:
“After the dismissal of the Bhutto government in 1996, the newly elected Prime M
inister Nawaz Sharif, his oil minister Chaudry Nisar Ali Khan, the army and the
ISI fully backed Unocal. Pakistan wanted more direct US support for the Taliban
and urged Unocal to start construction quickly in order to legitimize the Taliba
n. Basically the USA and Unocal accepted the ISI’s analysis and aims---that a Ta
liban victory in Afghanistan would make Unocal’s job much easier and quicken US
recognition.”
Her appealing and glamorous pro-Western image notwithstanding, Bhutto’s true rec
ord is one of corruption and accommodation.
The “war on terrorism” resparked
Every major Anglo-American geostrategic crime has been preceded by a convenient
pretext, orchestrated and carried out by “terror” proxies directly or indirectly
connected to US military-intelligence, or manipulated into performing as intell
igence assets. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto is simply one more brutal exa
mple.
This was Pakistan’s 9/11; Pakistan’s JFK assassination, and its impact will reso
nate for years.
Contrary to mainstream corporate news reporting, chaos benefits Bush-Cheney’s “w
ar on terrorism”. Calls for “increased worldwide security” will pave the way for
a muscular US reaction, US-led force and other forms of “crack down” from Bush-
Cheney across the region. In other words, the assassination helps ensure that th
e US will not only never leave, but also increase its presence.
The Pakistani election, if it takes place at all, is a simpler two-way choice: p
ro-US Musharraf or pro-US Sharif.
While the success of Bush-Cheney’s 9/11 agenda has met with mixed results, and i
t has met with a wide array of resistance (“terroristic” as well as political),
there is no doubt that the propaganda foundation of the “war on terrorism” has r
emained firm, unshaken and routinely reinforced.
As for Nawaz Sharif, who now emerges as the sole competitor for Musharraf, he, l
ike Musharraf and Bhutto, is legendary for his accommodation to Anglo-American i
nterests---pipelines, trade, and the continued US military presence. As Jean-Cha
rles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie noted in the book Forbidden Truth, the Octobe
r 1999 military coup led by Musharraf that originally toppled Sharif’s regime wa
s sparked by animosity between the two camps, as well as “Sharif’s personal corr
uption and political megalomania”, and “concerns that Sharif was dancing too eag
erly to Washington’s tune on Kashmir and Afghanistan”.
In other words, Bush-Cheney wins, no matter which asset winds up on the throne."
Posted by Rocker at 9:08 PM http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=4945172325
20846512&postID=3723091231335712607 http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=49
4517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607
Labels: Pakistan

Links to this post


Throwing More Dirt on Bhutto s Grave http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?bl
ogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frock
thetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F04%2Fthrowing-more-dirt-on-bhuttos-grave.html ht
tp://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=37230912
31335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F04%2Fth
rowing-more-dirt-on-bhuttos-grave.htmlThat s how you bury things, right? "Analys
ts skeptical Bhutto investigation will result in justice; UN report says Musharr
af regime did not protect her" by Chris Brummitt, Associated Press | April 17, 2
010 ... Posted by Rocker at April 19, 2010 4:35 PM
Panetta the Prick http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=49451723252084
6512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.
com%2F2010%2F03%2Fpanetta-prick.html http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?bl
ogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frock
thetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F03%2Fpanetta-prick.htmlUsing predators to do it
to Pakistan: "CIA chief says attacks hamper Al Qaeda" by Joby Warrick, Washingto
n Post | March 18, 2010 Anyone ever point out to you that the Washington Post is
the CIA s newspaper, readers? ... Posted by Rocker at March 30, 2010 12:45 PM
Pakistan s American Face http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=4945172
32520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.bl
ogspot.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fpakistans-american-face.html http://www.blogger.com/del
ete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=
http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fpakistans-american-face.ht
mlIf you want the low-down on Pakistani politics, go HERE and check out the MUST
READ section! He knows a propagandist when he sees one! "BU professor-turned-Pa
kistan-envoy draws fire" by Farah Stockman, Globe Staff | November 4, 2009 ... P
osted by Rocker at November 4, 2009 3:33 PM
Predator Precipitates Pakistani Divorce http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g
?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Fr
ockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fpredator-precipitates-pakistani-divorce_
10.html http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postI
D=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009
%2F08%2Fpredator-precipitates-pakistani-divorce_10.htmlRelated: Pakistan Taleban
chief Baitullah Mehsud, DIED SIX MONTHS AGO! Dead Pakistan Taleban Chief Take
s Credit for Lahore Terror Attack Desperately Seeking Baitullah Then they killed
a widow? "Strike reportedly kills wife of Taliban ... Posted by Rocker at Augus
t 10, 2009 12:37 PM
Sunday Globe Censorship: Pakistan Pattern http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink
.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2
Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F07%2Fsunday-globe-censorship-pakistan.html
http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=372309
1231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F07%2F
sunday-globe-censorship-pakistan.htmlYa think? Related: Slow Saturday Special: C
ensored Missile Strike Slow Saturday Special: Submerged Missile Strike "Pakistan
i jets kill 9 militants in northwest ISLAMABAD—Government warplanes flattened a
suspected Taliban hide-out in the ... Posted by Rocker at July 19, 2009 11:45 AM
Slow Saturday Special: Submerged Missile Strike http://www.blogger.com/delete-ba
cklink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3
A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F07%2Fslow-saturday-special-submerged-
missile.html http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&
postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2
F2009%2F07%2Fslow-saturday-special-submerged-missile.htmlLook where they put it!
!! "Bombs kill British soldier, 11 civilians in Afghanistan; NATO s toll for thi
s month increases to 48" by Robert H. Reid, Associated Press | July 18, 2009. KA
BUL, Afghanistan - A suspected US missile strike ... Posted by Rocker at July 18
, 2009 11:59 PM
The Perceptive Pakistani People and Propaganda http://www.blogger.com/delete-bac
klink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A
%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F06%2Fperceptive-pakistani-people-and.h
tml http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=37
23091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F0
6%2Fperceptive-pakistani-people-and.htmlYeah, THEY KNOW!! The only ones who don
t are US FOOLS in ZIONIST-SOAKED and BRAINWASHED AmeriKa!!!! "Angry at the the l
ack of security provided by police to Naeemi and his seminary.... students compl
ained that security had not been ... Posted by Rocker at June 16, 2009 6:10 PM
Who Is Winning the War in Waziristan? http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?b
logID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Froc
kthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F06%2Fwho-is-winning-war-in-waziristan.html http
://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231
335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F06%2Fwho-
is-winning-war-in-waziristan.htmlWe know who is losing: A man wept at the site o
f a bomb attack and ambush in the Peshawar, in Pakistan s North West Frontier Pr
ovince. (Ali Imam/Reuters). Related: Waziristan War Report "Insurgent ambush, bo
mbs kill at least 13 in ... Posted by Rocker at June 10, 2009 10:35 AM
The Hallmarks of a False-Flag Attack at Pakistani Police Academy http://www.blog
ger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&b
acklinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F04%2Fhallmarks-of-fa
lse-flag-attack-at.html http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=49451723
2520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blo
gspot.com%2F2009%2F04%2Fhallmarks-of-false-flag-attack-at.htmlBefore you read th
e propaganda report from the Zionist-controlled, agenda-pushing, war-promoting r
eport, please consider what the blogs dug up: The guy they are claiming is makin
g this threat, Pakistan Taleban chief Baitullah Mehsud, ... Posted by Rocker at
April 1, 2009 6:39 AM
The Pitter-Patter of Pakistani Feet http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blo
gID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockt
hetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F03%2Fpitter-patter-of-pakistani-feet.html http://
www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335
712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F03%2Fpitter-
patter-of-pakistani-feet.htmlAnybody find the timing of protests odd after a pea
ce deal was struck with the Taliban? CUI BONO? Who wants in to Pakistan, folks?
(See my Pakistan labels for more) "Pressure on Pakistan to reconcile grows; US,
Britain step up calls for ... Posted by Rocker at March 15, 2009 1:18 PM
preparing pakistan for occupation http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogI
D=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthe
truth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F03%2Fpreparing-pakistan-for-occupation.html http://
www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335
712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F03%2Fprepari
ng-pakistan-for-occupation.htmlagenda-pushing zionist msm has spent months on th
e project. first, pakistan sacrifices its own citizens on the alter of usraeli l
ies: "pakistan says it s closing in on taliban stronghold" by chris brummitt, as
sociated press | march 1, ... Posted by Rocker at March 6, 2009 11:48 PM
pakistan s jfk http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=49451723252084651
2&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com
%2F2008%2F12%2Fpakistans-jfk.html http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogI
D=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthe
truth2.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F12%2Fpakistans-jfk.html"pakistanis mark anniversary
of bhutto s death; tears, vigils as prime minister is remembered" by laura king
, los angeles times | december 28, 2008. karachi - with tears, prayers, and cand
lelight vigils, pakistanis yesterday marked the ... Posted by Rocker at December
28, 2008 8:10 AM
more us missiles pock pakistan http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=4
94517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetru
th2.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F10%2Fmore-us-missiles-pock-pakistan.html http://www.bl
ogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607
&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Frockthetruth2.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F10%2Fmore-us-missi
les-pock-pakistan.htmlenough, already, will ya?! just stop killing innocent peop
le with air bombs, dammit!!!! "suspected us strike on taliban kills six in pakis
tan; attack near base of warlord accused in bhutto s death" by candace rondeaux
and shaiq hussain, ... Posted by Rocker at October 17, 2008 5:31 AM
johnito magazine http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846
512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Fstanvanhoucke.blogspot.c
om%2F2008%2F07%2Fjohnito-magazine.html http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?
blogID=494517232520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Fst
anvanhoucke.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fjohnito-magazine.htmljohnito magazine ber
icht: deze week (vervolg): pakistan, marteling, libanon, iran en de crisis. nou
waar was ik gebleven? o, ja, ik ging van pakistan naar libanon, in één van mijn
vorige blogs.maar eerst nog even enkele toevoegingen ... Posted by stan at July
17, 2008 2:35 AM
deze week (vervolg): pakistan, marteling, libanon, iran en de crisis http://www.
blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=494517232520846512&postID=37230912313357126
07&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnito.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fdeze-week-vervolg
-pakistan-marteling.html http://www.blogger.com/delete-backlink.g?blogID=4945172
32520846512&postID=3723091231335712607&backlinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnito.blogspot
.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fdeze-week-vervolg-pakistan-marteling.htmlnou waar was ik gebl
even? o, ja, ik ging van pakistan naar libanon, in één van mijn vorige blogs. ma
ar eerst nog even enkele toevoegingen over de situatie in pakistan: daar zijn st
amleiders namelijk diep bezorgd over het toenemende ... Posted by blogkeeper at
July 16, 2008 5:03 PM
Create a Link

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen