Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
INTRODUCTION
1.1 OUTLINE OF THE PROJET
Mutual funds are a financial intermediate that collects the savings of
investors and invest them in a large and well- diversified portfolio of
securities such as money market instruments corporate and Government
bonds and equity shares of joint stock companies.
SEBI
Sponsor
Truste
e AMC
Marketing
Operation Fund
Marketing
Mutual Fund
Distribution
Schemes
Investor
Sponsor
Sponsor is the person who acting alone or in combination with
another body corporate establishes a mutual fund. Sponsor must contribute
at least 40%of the net worth of the Investment Managed and meet the
eligibility criteria prescribed under the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (Mutual fund) Regulations, 1996. The sponsor is not responsible or
liable for any loss or shortfall resulting from the operation of the schemes
beyond the initial contribution made by it towards setting up Mutual Fund.
1.1.1 Need importance of the study
Standard chartered Mutual Fund, one of the leading mutual fund
companies in the private sector, has been successfully in the industry by
providing a wide range of products to suit a variety of investors needs.
Formulation of alternative schemes by various mutual fund companies has
become important to fight the battle and to secure a sound position in the
industry.
The study was undertaken with the objective of helping the company
design new schemes to suit the requirements of the retail investors.
1.1.2 Scope of the study
X = XW / W
Analysis Of Variances- (ANOVA): -
The analysis of variance is a method, which separates the variation
ascribable to one set of causes from the variation ascribable to other set. The
first object of the analysis of variance is to obtain a measure of the total
variation within the series and the second object is to find a measure of
variation between or among the components. Then the test of significance
of difference between the variation in two series or more may be measured.
Thus we can also test the hypothesis that the means of all the components
constituting a population are equal to the mean of the population or that the
samples have come from the same population. It is used to test whether the
means of a number of populations are equal. In the manifold classification
we consider two or more characteristic or attributes. The analysis in that
case will get extended to include the sum of squares between rows. This
type of classification is also called as a two way ANOVA.
Trust
The mutual fund is constituted as a trust in accordance with the
provisions of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 by the sponsor. The trust deed is
registered under the Indian Regulation Act, 1908.
Trustee is usually a company (corporate body) or a Board of Trustee
(body of individuals). The main responsibility of Trustee is to safeguard the
interest of the unit holders and inter alia ensure that the AMC functions in
the interest of investors and in accordance with the Securities and Exchange
Board of India (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996, the provisions of the Trust
Deed and the Offer Document of the respective Schemas. At least 2/3 rd
directors of the trustee are independent directors who are not associated with
the Sponsor in any manner.
Asset Management Company (AMC)
The Trustee as an Investment Manager of Mutual fund appoints the
AMC. The AMC is to be approved by the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (SEBI) to act as an asset management company of the mutual fund. At
least 50% of the directors of the AMC must have a net worth of at least 10
Crores at all times.
Register and Transfer Agent
The AMC if so authorized by the trust Deed appoints the Registrar
and Transfer Agent to the Mutual Fund. The Registrar processes the
application form redemption requests and dispatches account statements to
the unit holders. The registrar and Transfer agent handles communications
with investors and updates investors records.
1.1.5 Limitations Of The Study
The study has been conducted in a short span of three months, which
was a limitation to the project.
The sample size was restricted to 200 keeping in account the various
constraints such as time, cost and availability of respondents.
The respondents were reluctant to disclose their personal decisions on
investments.
1.1.6 Chapterisation
Chapter 1 includes the Introduction of the study, Need of the study,
then Scope of the study, Objective of study, then regarding Research
Methodology, then about the limitations of the study, then the theory
perspective of the study.
Chapter 2 includes Data Analysis and interpretation, in which analysis
about the study is being made with the help of tables, bar diagrams, and pie
diagrams and statistical tools such as Chi-square, ANOVA and weighted
average is being used.
Chapter 3 includes the finding of the study, suggestions and
conclusions of they study, appendices questionnaire and references.
1.2 Review Of Literature
1.2.1. Company Profile
Standard Chartered mutual Fund launched its first scheme Grind lays
Super Saver Income Fund in the year July 2000. Since then it focused on
debt for 5 years and launched several innovative products that went to
become bourgeoning categories in the Indian mutual fund industry. The
Sponsor of standard Chartered mutual fund is Standard Chartered Bank, a
Multinational banking and financial services group with a unique
international network. Standard Chartered is the world leading emerging
markets bank. It employs over 28,000 People in over 500 Offices in more
than 50 countries in the Asia pacific, South Asia, the Middle East, Africa,
UK and the Americas managing assets over USS 100 Billion. With nearly
152 Years in the emerging markets the bank has unmatched knowledge and
understanding of its customers in its markets.
With the experience in the debt markets in the last five years we stand as the
second highest in terms of Dept AUM. We have also launched our maiden
equity fund Standard Chartered Classic Equity fund and garnered Rs.1023
Crores in the NFO ended July 14, 2005
In its five years of experience, the fund has carved a niche for itself, with a
quite a few notable achievements:
Two of the Standard Chartered Schemes (GCF and GFRT-St) has been
rated AAAF by CRICIL. The Rating means that the Schemes
portfolio holding provide a Very Strong Protection against losses
from credit default.
The Mutual funds, being set up in the public sector, have given the
impression of being as safe a conduct for investment as bank deposit.
Another important thing is that the dividends and capital gains are
reinvested automatically in mutual funds and hence are not fretted
away. The automatic reinvestment feature of a mutual fund is a form
of forced saving and can make a big difference in the long run.
The Mutual fund attracts foreign capital flow in the country and
secures profitable investment avenues abroad for domestic savings
through the opening of off shore funds in various foreign investors.
Lastly another notable thing is that mutual funds are considered safe.
Due to all these reasons the importance of mutual fund has been
increasing.
They select the fund strategy, hire managers, market the shares to
potential investors and do the paper work.
Types Of Fund
Close-ended ones on several Counts some of these are listed below these
funds are sold at the NAV based price, generally calculated on every
business day.
The balanced fund aims to provide both growth and income. These
funds invest in both shares and fixed income securities in the proportion
indicated in their offer document these are ideal for investors looking for a
combination of income and moderate growth.
V) Money Market Mutual Funds
Index funds generally buy shares in all the companies composing the
BSE nifty or other broad stock market indices. They are not suitable for
investors who must Conserve their principal or maximize current income.
IV) Flexibility
Mutual Funds have generally but back arrangement after a stipulated
period, so that the expiry of this period the investors can easily change
his portfolio by selling particular units. In this way, he can reinvest the
money where the finds lucrative returns and less return.
V) Liquidity
Mutual Funds are required by the SEBI to provide liquidity to
investors. They are ready to buy the units the investors at the NAV on a
day after the expiry of the initial lock-in- period. They announce through
daily newspapers their re-purchase price of units under the various
schemes after regular intervals Some Mutual Funds are also listed in
various stock exchanges and be sold off by the individual investors at the
prevailing market price.
VI) Tax Shelter
Income tax exemption has been ensured for Mutual Funds, while
originally only such Mutual Fondas as are set up by public sector bans or
a public financial institution were exempt from tax. Now the benefit of
tax exemption has been extended to all Mutual Funds. Investors are
eligible for deduction under Section 80L of the Income Tax Act in respect
of the dividends from or share of Mutual Funds and under Section 88 in
respect of contributions made by investors to unit lined insurance plan of
UTI and GIC mutual funds.
VII) Other Advantages
Investing in securities through Mutual Funds has many advantages lie
option to reinvest dividends, strong possibility of capital appreciation,
regular returns etc. mutual funds are also relevant in national interest
Apart from providing the above advantages, Mutual Funds also provide
the following additional advantages
Stable return,
Botheration Free Investment,
Developing saving habit, habit, and
Safely because of Government regulations.
Many of the mutual funds abroad offers series of monthly investment
plans
Monthly weekly withdrawal plan to another, Mutual funds Provide a
convenient and effective link between saving and investment
Disadvantages Of Mutual Funds
Mutual funds are emerged all over the world as a fact of economic
life, but they are not free from limitations following are the notable
disadvantages of mutual funds
High Management Cost
Mutual funds have to incur substantial expenses to manage the invest
able funds garnered from investors These include the salaries of the
professional experts employed by the fund to manage its portfolio The
management costs of the fund are deducted among the investors This
reduces the retunes that would have otherwise been available to the investors
hand they managed portfolio themselves
High Promotional Expenses
Cut throat competition among the various mutual funds o mobilize the
savings of the masses necessitates heavy promotional expenses A lot of
money is spent on promotion of every scheme launched by the mutual funds
in India These expenses are likely to magnify with the entry of more players
in the mutual fund industry, as the increase in competition would lead to
heavier promotional expenses This will further reduce the net returns, which
would be available for distribution among the mutual fund investors
Flexibility
Because of a fund holds many stocks, it may be difficult for it to
unload its shares when the market goes down Thus, by keeping money in a
fund, the investors may have to ride the market down On the hand, there is
no reason why his or her individual shares in the fund cannot be redeemed at
any time The shares size of some funds reduces the flexibility to buy and sell
as frequently and in as large volumes as the fund managers may prefer
Redemption Costs
Through he buy back offered by mutual funds dose import liquidity to
the investors portfolio, the price at which the shares are redeemed is net of
redemption costs Therefore, the consideration that the investors gets in
reduced on account of the redemption costs which is deducted, making
investment in mutual funds disadvantages.
1.2.2 INDUSTRY PROFILE
The mutual fund industry in India started in 1963 with the formation
of UTI of India. At the initiative of the Government of India and Reserve
Bank. The history of mutual funds in India can be broadly divided into four
distinct phases:
1987 market the entry of non- UTI, Public sector mutual funds set up
by public sector banks and life insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and
General Insurance corporation of India (GIC). State Bank of India mutual
fund was the first non-UTI Mutual fund established in June 1987 followed
by Canbank mutual fund (Dec 87), Punjab National Bank mutual fund (Aug
89), India Bank mutual fund (Nov 89), Bank of India its mutual fund in June
90) Bank of Baroda mutual fund (Oct 92) Life insurance Corporation
established its mutual fund in June 1989, while General Insurance
Corporation had set up its mutual fund industry in Dec 1990.
At the end of 1993, the mutual fund industry and assets under
management of Rs. 47004 Crores.
With the entry of private sector funds in 1993, a new era started in the
Indian mutual fund industry, giving the Indian investors a wider choice of
fund families. Also 1993 was year in which the first Mutual Fund
Regulations came into being, under which all mutual funds except Unit Trust
of India were to be registered and governed. The Kothari Pioneer was the
private sector mutual fund registered in July 1993 the 1993.
FOURTH PHASE
In Feb 2003, following the repeal of the Unit Trust of India Act UTI
was bifurcated into two separate entities. One is the specified undertaking of
the Unit Trust of India with assets under Management of Rs. 29835 crores as
at the end of Jan 2003, representing broadly, the assets of US64 Scheme,
assured return and certain other schemes. The Specified undertaking of UTI
of India, Functioning under an administrator and under the rules framed by
Government of India and does not come the purview of the mutual Fund
regulations.
GROWTH IN ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
The second is the Unit Trust of India Mutual Fund Limited Sponsored
by sbi, PNB, BOB and LIC. It is registered with SEBI and functions under
the Mutual fund regulation with the bifurcation of the erstwhile UTI which
had in March 2000 more then Rs. 76000 crores of assets under management
and with the setting up of a UTI mutual fund conforming to the SEBI
Mutual Fund regulation, and with recent mergers taking place among
different private sector funds the mutual fund industry has entered its current
phase of consolidation and growth. As at the end of September 2004, there
were 29 funds, which manage assets of Rs.153108 crores under 421
schemes.
The most important trend in the mutual fund industry is the aggressive
expansion of the foreign owned mutual fund companies and the decline of
the companies floated by nationalized banks and smaller private sector
players
Many nationalized banks got into the mutual fund business in the
early nineties and got off to a good stared due to the stock market boom
prevailing then. These banks did not really understand the mutual fund
business and they just viewed it as another kind of banking activity. Few
hired specialized staff and generally chose to transfer staff from the parent
organization. The performance of most of the schemes Jolted by these
parents funds was not. Good. Some Schemes had offered guaranteed returns
and their parent organizations had to bail out these AMCs by paying large
amounts of money as the difference between the guaranteed and actual
returns. The service levels were also very bad. Most of these AMCs have not
been able to retain staff, float new schemes etc. and it is doubtful whether,
barring a few exceptions, they have serious plans of continuing the activity
in a major way.
CHAPTER 2
CHART NO.2.1.2
AGE PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 33of the respondents are between the
age group 25-35 years, 31% of the respondents fall above the age group of
45 years, 23% of the respondents are between the age group 35-45 years,
and 13% of the respondents are below the age group of 25 years.
TABLE NO 2.1.3
OCCUPATION PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Respondents
OCCUPATION
Number Percentage
Business 50 33
Retired 33 22
Salaried 67 45
Total 150 199
CHART No.2.1.3
OCCUPATION PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 45% of the respondents belong to
salaried category. 33% of the respondents belong to business group and
22% of the respondents come under the retired category.
TABLE NO 2.1.4
ANNUAL INCOME PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Respondents
Annual Income
Number Percentage
Below Rs.60000 20 13
Rs.60000 Rs.150000 36 24
Rs.150000-Rs.300000 54 36
Rs.300000 and above 40 27
Total 150 100
CHART NO.2.1.4
ANNUAL INCOME PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 36% of the respondents annual
income is between Rs.1,50,000 /- Rs.3,00,000, 27% of the respondents
annual income is above Rs.3,00,000 lakhs, 24% of the respondents annual
income is between Rs.60,000-Rs.1,50,000 lakhs and the remaining 13% of
the respondents income is below Rs.60,000
TABLE NO 2.1.5
PERCENTAGE OF INVESTORS GROSS SAVINGS CURRENTLY
INVESTED IN MUTUAL FUND
Percentage of Saving Respondents
Invested in MF Number Percentage
Below 10% 37 25
10%-20% 52 35
20%-30% 39 26
Above 30% 22 14
Total 150 100
CHART No.2.1.5
PERCENTAGE OF INVESTORS GROSS SAVINGS CURRENTLY
INVESTED IN MUTUALFUND
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 35% of the investors have invested
10% -20% of their gross savings in mutual fund schemes, 26% of them have
invested 20%-30% of their savings in mutual fund and only 14% of them
have invested above 30% of their gross savings in mutual funds.
TABLE NO 2.1.6
FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR DECISION MAKING DURING
INVESTMENT IN MUTUAL FUND SCHEMES
Respondents
Factors
Number Percentage
Monthly Income 43 29
Annual Income 35 23
Total Tax 22 15
Return on investment 50 33
Total 150 100
CHART No.2.1.6
FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR DECISION MAKING DURING
INVESTMENT IN MUTUAL FUND SCHEME
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that during investment in mutual fund
schemes 33% of the respondents primary decision making responsibility
depends on the return from the investment, 29% of the respondents decision
making criteria depends on the monthly income of the respondents, 23% of
the respondents primary decision making depend on their annual income and
only 15% of the respondents depend on the total tax factor during decision
making.
TABLE NO 2.1.7
FROM THE MUTUAL FUND PREFERED
Respondents
From
Number Percentage
Open ended 108 72
Close ended 42 28
Total 150 100
CHART No.2.1.7
TYPE OF MUTUAL FUND PREFFERED
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 72% of the respondents prefer open-
ended type of fund and 28% of the respondents prefer close ended type of
fund.
TABLE NO 2.1.8
OPTION PREFERED BY THE RESPONDENTS
Respondents
Option
Number Percentage
Growth 51 34
Dividend Payout 86 57
Dividend Re-
13 9
investment
Total 150 100
CHART No.2.1.8
OPTION PREFEERED BY THE RESPONDENTS
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 57% of the respondents prefer
dividend payout option 34% of them prefer growth option and 9% of the
respondents prefer dividend Re-investment option in mutual fund
investment.
TABLE NO 2.1.9
MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS LEAD TO ABNORMAL RETURS
Respondents
Option
Number Percentage
YES 78 52
NO 72 48
Total 150 100
CHART NO.2.1.9
MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS LEAD TO ABNORMAL RETURS
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 52% of the respondents say yes and
48% of the respondents say no.
TABLE NO 2.1.10
RESPONDENTS PREFERENCE ON THE WAY DIVIDENDS ARE
DECLARED
Respondents
Option
Number Percentage
Monthly 28 19
Quarterly 51 34
Half Yearly 48 32
Annually 23 15
Total 150 100
CHART No.2.1.10
RESPONDENTS PREFERENCE ON THE WAY DIVIDENDS ARE
DECLARED
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 34% of the respondents want the
dividends to be declared quarterly, 32% of them prefer the dividends to be
declared half yearly, 19% of the respondents want the dividends to be
declared monthly and only 15% of the respondents want the dividends to be
declared annually.
TABLE NO 2.1.11
NORMAL RATE OF RETURN EXPECTED FROM THE SCHEME
Respondents
Option
Number Percentage
Below 10% 10 7
10%-20% 48 32
20%-30% 70 47
Above 30% 22 14
Total 150 100
CHART NO.2.1.11
NORMAL RATE OF RETUNR EXPECTED FROM THE SCHEME
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 47% of the respondents expected
20%-30% rate of return 32% of them expect a return of 10%-20%, 14% of
them expect a return of 10% -20% , 14% of them expect a return above 30%
and 7% of the respondents expect a return below 10%
TABLE NO 2.1.12
PREFERENCE OF RESPONDENTS TO MAKE AN INVESTMENT
DURING AN NEW FUND OFFER
Respondents
Option
Number Percentage
YES 117 78
NO 33 22
Total 150 100
CHART NO.2.1.12
PREFERENCE OF RESPONDENTS TO MAKE AN INVESTMENT
DURING AN NEW FUND OFFER
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 78% of the respondents prefer to
make an investment during the new fund offer and 22% of them do not
prefer to make an investment during new fund offer.
TABLE NO 2.13
TIME FREME PREFERRED BY THE INVESTOR WHILE
INVETING IN
MUTUAL FUND
Respondents
Option
Number Percentage
Less Than 1 Years 25 17
1-2 years 51 34
2-3 Years 45 30
More than 3 Years 29 19
Total 150 100
CHART NO.2.1.13
TIME FREME PREFERRED BY THE INVESTOR WHILE
INVETING IN
MUTUAL FUND
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 34% of the respondents prefer
investing in mutual fund for a duration of 1-2 years, 20% of them prefer a
time frame of 2-3 years, 19% of the respondents prefer investing in mutual
fund for a duration of more then 3 years, and a time frame of less than 1 year
is preferred only by 17% of the respondents.
TABLE NO 2.1.14
TYPE OF FUND PREFERRED BY THE REXSPONDENTS
Respondents
Preference of Fund
Number Percentage
Equity 74 49
Debt 45 30
Balanced 29 19
Total 150 100
TABLE NO 2.1.14
TYPE OF FUND PREFERRED BY THE RESPONDENTS
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 49% of the respondents prefer to
invest in equity fund 30% of them prefer to invest in debt fund and only
19% of the respondents prefer to make their investment in balanced fund.
TABLE NO 2.1.15
SATIFACTION LEVEL OF THE CURRENTLY INVESTED SCHEME
Respondents
Satisfaction Level;
Number Percentage
Highly Satisfied 28 19
Satisfied 80 53
Not Very Satisfied 23 15
Dissatisfied 19 13
Total 150 100
CHART2.1.15
SATISFACTION LEVEL ON THE CURRENTLY INVESTED
SCHEME
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 53% of the respondents are satisfied
with their current investment, 19% of them are highly satisfied, 15% of them
are not very satisfied with their investment and 13% of the respondents are
dissatisfied with their investment in mutual fund.
TABLE NO 2.1.16
RESPONDENTS SOURCE OF INFORMATION REGARDING
MUTUAL FUND
Respondents
Source of information
Number Percentage
Newspaper 49 32
Magazine 13 9
Television 36 24
Agents 35 23
Friends & Relatives 10 7
Others 7 5
Total 150 100
CHART 2.1.16
RESPONDENTS SOURCE OF INFORMATION REGARDING
MUTUAL FUND
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 32% of the respondents source of
information regarding mutual fund scheme is through newspaper, 24% of the
respondents source of information regarding mutual fund scheme is through
television, 23% of the respondents get information regarding mutual fund
through agents and 7% of them get information through their friends and
relatives.
TABLE NO 2.1.17
INTERMEDIARIES THROUGH WHICH RESPONDENTS MAKE
THEIR INVESRSTMENT
Respondents
Investment through
Number Percentage
Brokers 53 35
Bank 58 39
Agent 39 26
Total 150 100
TABLE NO 2.1.17
INTERMEDIARIES THROUGH WHICH RESPONDENTS MAKE
THEIR INVESRSTMENT
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 39% of the respondents have made
their investment through a bank, 35% of the respondents have invested
through brokers and the respondents who have invested through an agent is
26%
TABLE NO 2.1.18
RESPONDENTS SARISFACTION LEVEL WITH SERVICES
PROVIDED BY THE INTERMADIARIES
Respondents
Satisfaction Level
Number Percentage
Very Satisfied 56 37
Satisfied 47 47
Not Satisfied 23 15
Total 150 100
TABLE NO 2.1.18
RESPONDENTS SARISFACTION LEVEL WITH SERVICES
PROVIDED BY THE INTERMADIARIES
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 47% of the respondents are satisfied
with the services provided by the intermediaries, 37% of the respondents are
very satisfied with services, and 15% of the respondents are not satisfied
with the services of the intermediaries
2.2 STATISTICAL TOOL
2.21.a WEIGHTED AVERAGE RESPONDENTS RANKING OF THE
VARIOUS OBJECTIVES OF MUTUAL FUND SCHEMES
TABLE NO.2.2.1.a
Rank 5 4 3 2 1 Wx WX
Factor X
Return 750 750 5
Tax 150 432 12 6 600 4
exemption
Capital 192 324 516 3.44
Appreciatio
n
Liquidity 90 264 198 552 3.68
Professiona 24 90 216 6 336 2.24
l
Manageme
nt
Safety 120 268 159 12 559 3.73
Value 24 240 3 267 1.78
Addition
Convenien 18 144 162 1.08
ce
INFERENCE
Objects Ranks
Return 1
Tax Exemption 2
Safety 3
Risk Diversification 4
Liquidity 5
Capital Appreciation 6
Professional Management 7
Value Addition Convenience 8
Convenience 9
Label1
INFERENCE
Objects Ranks
UTI 4
CAN BANK 7
HDFC 6
Standard Chartered 3
ICICI 5
Franklin Templeton 1
Fidelity 8
Sunduram 2
Kotak 9
Tata 10
2.2.2 CHI- SQUARE
TABLE NO.2.2.2.a
Annual Percentage of Savings Invested in Mutual Fund
Income
10% 10%20% 20%-30% >30% Total
Below Rs. 11 8 1 0 20
6000
Rs. 6000- 12 16 5 3 36
Rs. 150000
Rs. 150000- 6 18 7 9 40
Rs 300000
Rs. 300000 8 10 26 10 54
and Above
Total 37 52 39 22 150
HYPOTHESIS
Ho : There is no Significant relationship between investors annual Income
and the percentage of Savings invested in mutual fund
H1 There is Signification relationship between investors annual income
and the percentage of saving invested in mutual fund.
O E (O- E) (O-E) 2 (O-E) 2/E
11 5 6 36 7.2
12 9 3 9 1
6 10 4 16 1.6
8 13 5 25 1.9
8 7 1 1 0.14
16 12 4 16 1.33
18 14 4 16 1.14
11 24 -13 169 7.14
5 9 -4 16 1.78
7 10 -3 9 0.9
26 17 9 81 4.76
12 11 1 1 0.09
10 8 2 4 0.5
Total 16.31 29.39
HYPOTHESIS:
HO : There is no relationship in funds
H 1O : There is no relationship in their level of satisfaction
H1 : There is relationship in funds
H11 : There is relationship in their level of satisfaction.
1.
Correction factor (CF) = T2 /N2
= 1502 / 6 = 3750
2.
x ij2 = 4140
3.
Tj2 / n = 11348/3 = 3783
4.
Tj2 / k = 7572/2 -= 3786
5.
Total sum of square (TSS) = 4140 3750 =390
6.
Sum of Square between Row (SSR) = 3783 3750 =33
7.
Sum of Square between Column (SSC) = 3786 3750 =36
8.
Error Sum of Square (ESS) = TSS SSR SSC
= 390 33-36
= 321
9.
Mean sum of Square :
MSF = SSR / K 1
= 33/1=33
MSC = SSC /n-1
= 36 / 2 =18
MSE = ESS / (k-1) (n-1)
= 321 / (1) (2)
= 160.5
9. FR = MSR / MSE
= 33/160.5
= 0.205
FC = MSC/MSE
= 18/160.5
= 0.112
FR= (K-1, (N-1) (K-1)) = (1, 2) = 18.5
FC= (N-1, (N-1) (K-1)) = (1, 2) = 18.5
Therefore Accept H0&H10
Conclusion:
HO : There is no relationship in funds
H1O : There is no relationship in their level of satisfaction .
CHAPTER 3
FINDINGS
It is observed that 78% of the respondents belong to Male category
and 2% of thee respondents belong to Female group.
It is observed that 335 of the respondents are between the age group
25 35 years, 31% of the respondents fall above the age group of 45
years, 23% of the respondents is between the age group 35 45 years,
and 13% of the respondents are below the age group of 25 years
It is observed that 45% of the respondents belong to salaried category,
33% of the respondents belong to0 business group and 22% of the
respondents come under the retired category.
It is observed that 52% of the respondents say Yes and 48% of the
respondents say no
It is observed that 53% of the respondents are satisfied with their current
investment 19% of them are highly satisfied, 15% of them are not very
satisfied with their investments and 13% of the respondents are
dissatisfied with their investment in mutual fund.
3.2. SUGGESTION
Dividends can be declared regularly, preferably on a quarterly basis
Investment can be made in IT, FMCG or Banking industry in case of sect
oral fund.
Advertisement through Newspapers and Television can be made to
increase the level of a awareness about the schemes.
Regular updates/ Feedback about the various schemes can be provided to
the investors.
In case of any new scheme have been introduced it must be made known
to customers at any cost
They should also have to concentrate on individual
Some educational programs should be conducted
3.3. CONCLUSION
From the study one gathers that the mutual find investments seem to
be a popular investment option. In the last few years, there has been a
fundamental change in the household saving, and the share investment, as a
percentage of the savings has gone up substantially. The number of
investors has increased to a great extent and the mutual fund industry is
becoming extremely responsive by launching different products to cater to
the diverse need of the investors. Investors have a lot of options in the
mutual fund schemes. Majority of the investors prefer to invest in open-
ended schemes and the satisfaction level of the investors is also high. The
investors also prefer to invest during the new fund offer. From this study the
investors preferences are known, which will help the company in launching
new products to the investors.
A STUDY ON THE INVESTORS PREFERENCE WITH REGARD TO
MUTUAL FUNDSCHEMES WITH REFERENCE TO SCMF ASSETS
MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Dear Respondent,
1. Name :
Factors 5 4 3 2 1
Return on investment
Tax exemption
Capital appreciation
Liquidity
Risk diversification
Profession management
Safety
Value addition
Convenience
Yes No
12. Do you prefer to make an investment during the new Fund Offer?
Yes No
13. If you prefer a dividend option how would you like your dividends to
be declared?
14. What is the Normal Rate of Return do you expect from the Scheme?
15. What is the time frame you would prefer while investing in mutual
fund?
Less than 1 Yr. 1-2 Yrs. 2-3 Yrs. More than 3 Yrs.
17. What is your Satisfaction level on the currently invested mutual fund
scheme in Standard Chartered?
20. Are you satisfied with the services provided by a broker, bank, or an
agent?
Very Satisfied Satisfied Not Satisfied
Websites
www.standard chartered.com
www.google.com