Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
the boundaries are ill defined . This book is thus the result of what I
came to regard as neurophilosophicalinquiries.
Given the range of topics I needed to know about, I was through -
out the project necessarily dependent on the willingness of neuro-
scientists to explain their research, to tell me what they thought was
important and why , and to give advice on who else to talk to and
what to read. My vvorst fear- that as a philosopher I would be con-
sidered an utter waste of time - was virtually never realized. Invari -
ably neuroscientists were exceedingly generous, often going beyond
explanations asked, allowing me to observe or participate in experi-
ments, explaining details of techniques, and drawing back the curtain
on the wider vision that motivated their research.
From time to time I found considerable disagreement among
neuroscientists on fundamental issues, and at first I tacitly assumed
that there must be someone who really knew what was what and who
could settle for me what is the Truth . In the end I knew that I had to
make up my own mind , and do it the way any neuroscientist would :
find out as much as I reasonably could about the issue and go with
what seemed most reasonable. A vague decision procedure, to be
sure, but the only one I know of .
Without the generosity and patience of many people, not only
neuroscientists , but also philosophers , psychologists, and computer
scientists, this book would still be a shapeless intention . To Larry
Jordan I am especially indebted for giving me a basis in neurophysiol -
ogy and in laboratory techniques and for convincing me that it is
essential to think about how organisms move. I also owe an enor-
mous debt to Rodolfo Llinas , whose unique blend of experimental
understanding and drive for theory gave me a sense of what a large,
unifying framework for neurobiology and psychology might look like
and how known data would figure in that framework . For similar
reasons, I am grateful to Francis Crick , whose general understanding
of the entire field of vision and sense of how theoretical problems in
neurobiology might be solved directed me in getting a grip on the
functional questions . More than anyone else, Llinas and Crick have
made neuroscience seem like the most exciting thing in the world and
consequently rekindled - and, I suspect, realigned- my philosoph -
ical preoccupations .
Among philosophers , my first and greatest debt is to Paul M .
Churchland , who has been a partner in the venture from the very
beginning . It was he especially who convinced me of the importance
of bringing science and the philosophy of science to bear on questions
in the philosophy of mind , and this has made all the difference in
thinking about consciousness, cognition , and subjective experience,
and about the general framework needed for a unified science of the
.
Preface Xl
PSC
LaJolla1985
This excerpt is provided, in screen-viewable form, for personal use only by
members of MIT CogNet.