no Halaman Judul Penulis Tahun

A. Pola, G.B. Crosta, F.

Characterization and comparison of
Agliardi, N. Fusi, V.
73 pore distribution in weathered 2010
Barberini & L.
volcanic rocks by different techniques
Galimberti, E. De Ponti

Geotechnical properties of volcanic

99 S. Yksek & A. Demirci 2010
materials of the Mount Erciyes

Slope stability in the Canary J.A. Rodrguez-Losada &

volcanoes based on geotechnical A. Eff-Darwich, L.E.
183 Slope stability in the Canary Hernndez, C. Olalla 2010
volcanoes based on geotechnical Maran, A. Perucho &
criteria A. Serrano Gonzlez

Geological and geotechnical V.C. Rodrigues, S.P.P.

307 conditions of the MachicoCanial Rosa, J.A.M. Brito & C.J.O. 2010
highway Baio

Geomechanical appraisal of the

313 deformation potential of a deep D. Simic, J. Lpez 2010
tunnel in a volcanic rock mass
 F.A. Sousa, A.R.J. Freitas,
Project and technical
331 assistance to the retaining structures of CaboM.F.M.
GiroConceio
Tourist Resort
& 2010
C.J.O. Baio

F.A. Sousa, A.R.J. Freitas,

Retaining
339
structures in Machico-Canial expressway at Madeira
M.F.M. Island
Conceio & 2010
C.J.O. Baio

Tindaya
347 Mountain Cavern: art and underground engineering
J. Ramos Gmez 2010
 Rekap Jurnal Volcanic
Publikasi Variabel Metode

Volcanic Rock quantify porosity of

Pycnometer, X-ray,
Mechanics altered/weathered volcanic
Fotometri
Olalla et al. (eds) materials

Some experimental test to Geotechnical Properties

Volcanic Rock
gain correlation of the Test, Thermal
Mechanics
properties, in Pumice, Tuff, Conductivity, P Wave
Olalla et al. (eds)
Ignimbrite, basalt Test

Volcanic Rock
Height, Friction Angle, GSI, Hoek And Brown
Mechanics
Cohesion Criterion
Olalla et al. (eds)

Geological Field &

Volcanic Rock quantify Geothecnic
Geothecnical
Mechanics characterization of volcanic
characterization
Olalla et al. (eds) materials
Analysis, X-ray

quantify Geological Strength

Volcanic Rock GSI, RMR, geothecnical
Index, RMR of Volcanic
Mechanics characterization
materials (ophiolite
Olalla et al. (eds) analysis
complex)
 geotechnical parameters of soil nailing slopes; pull-
the soil(mainly tuff); out tests to measure
Volcanic Rock excavation the
Mechanics slopes; retaining structures pulling-out force;
Olalla et al. (eds) and soil horizontal and installation of 70
vertical displacements in topographical
the surface marks to observe

gravity wall; jet-

slope deposits; slopes in
Volcanic Rock grouting foundation;
more compact/weathered
Mechanics anchored pile walls;
formations; drainage
Olalla et al. (eds) soil nailed walls and
system
slopes

installation of a
systematic array
of tensioned anchors
;install reinforcing
elements before
excavation; the
stability sensitives to a
variety of
geotechnical parameters;
factors, especially
Volcanic Rock stress concentrations; in situ
joint orientations. It is
Mechanics ground stresses determined
thus considered that
Olalla et al. (eds) during hydrofracture tests;
the
3DEC model; hydrogeology
support will need to be
validated or modified
using
the joint data collected
during the excavation
of
the Space.
of the cavern
Permasalahan
Hasil

Significant Corellation betweem, P-wave velocity vs UCS, Porosity vs

unit weight, UCS vs thermal conductivity coefficient, dry unit weight
vs UCS, and p-wave velocity-dry vs p-wave velocity-saturated

Higher Slope Height, Higher Cohesion; Higher Slope Height, lower

friction angel in isotropiclow cemented pyroclastic rocks
 maximum horizontal displacement
registered at the retaining walls was of about 3 to
4 mm for the higher structures; in the excavation structures the
measures never reached 0,1% of the excavation
height,

where the slope

deposits were so deep, the recommendation was to build reinforced
concrete walls with 1000 millimeter diameter jetgrouting piles
normally driven into the bed rock ; Where the slope deposits were
not deep, the recommendation was
to build gravity type walls of cyclopean concrete

The distribution of joints appears relatively uniform

within the massive trachyte body with four
dominant joint sets; The strength of the master joints between the
blocks is assumed to have Mohr-Coulomb strength
parameters, with zero cohesion and tension; The support in the arch
galleries will be installed and operative before excavation of the
cavern roof starts ; The cavern roof will be excavated as a series of
parallel headings from the light shafts and rock bolts and anchors
will be installed as the headings; are advanced; The remaining
cavern volume will be excavated as a series of benches and the
constructor will choose to simply remove the rock as spoil or recover
blocks for commercial use; The entrance tunnel will be excavated to
full size
from the cavern to the portal.
Kesimpulan

*) a significant relationship exists between porosity and

alteration/weathering grade for all the samples. Total porosity
increases with grade.; *) Pycnometer results are generally slightly
higher than X-ray tomography data. This could result by forced
intrusion and damaging or opening of small fractures

These parameters show these

rocks quite suitable for construction purposes especially
the thermal conductivity coefficient hints to
the fact that most of these rocks have a property
for energy saving in case being used in house constructions.

*)Analysis carried out on the matrix showed that the clay fraction is
essentially comprised of montmorillonite (around 95%) *)the
extremely rough geomorphology of the zone can influence to the
establishment of basic criteria for the civil works design ; *)These
problems required an important development of the geological and
geotechnical studies, since the surveying phase, until the conclusion
of the civil works, as well as the involvement of a multi-disciplinary
group of technicians

*)Do and Sch-Do formations do not show squeezing

problems even at the maximum tunnel
depth; *)Sh formation shows only minor squeezing problems when
encountered in the tunnel deeper than 150 m; *)The F formation,
corresponding to the possible faults (which were not detected in any of
the borings) shows squeezing behaviour when encountered deeper
than 100 m.
 The retaining structures and design, which is cooperation between
Architecture and Engineering, corresponded to 15% of the works total
value; architectural design resulting
from the geotechnical conditionings is adequate
behavior of the structures, and no instability was
detected.

these walls
provide good guarantees against deformation
and consequently limit any deformations in the
embankments and in the pavement overlying.

The
pres-support and excavation of the cavern roof
will be critical and the instrumentation will focus
on the monitoring of the support and the movement
of the rock mass above the rock arches and
between the rock arches and cavern roo