Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Less than 14 years has elapsed since hears it. By connecting a pen-writing
Bekesy's original description of a self- system to the attenuator a graphic
recording audiometer (2). Within this representation, or tracing, of the sub-
period, however, the technique of ject's successive threshold crossings
'Bekesy audiometry' has rapidly gained may be obtained.
the stature of a major clinical and The Bekesy technique is particu-
research tool in audiology'. larly useful in psychoacoustics. It lends
Bekesy audiometry refers to a itself admirably, for example: to the
method in which the subject traces his measurement of temporary threshold
own auditory threshold by means of shift following acoustic stimulation
a suitable self-recording audiometer. and has been so employed by several
The threshold tracing signal may be investigators (6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 31,
either a fixed frequency or a gradually 32, 33, 34). It finds use in the measure-
changing frequency, and the signal ment of pure-tone masking (3, Y).
may be either continuous or periodi- The present paper is concerned, how-
cally interrupted in time, but the ever, only with Bekesy audiometry as
essence of Bekesy's method is, first, a clinical tool in the evaluation of the
that the signal intensity is always hearing impaired. In the majority of
changing at a constant rate, and second, papers concerned with the clinical ap-
that the subject determines the direc- plication of Bekesy audiometry, meas-
tion of this change by alternately urement and description have been
pressing and releasing a key that re- confined almost exclusively to the
verses the direction of a motor-driven width or amplitude of the audiometric
attenuator. He is instructed to press tracing. This distance or width may
this key when he just hears the tone be expressed either in decibels or in
and to release it when he just-no-longer number of threshold crossings over a
given frequency span. In the graphic
James Jerger (Ph.D., Northwestern Uni- form of the Bekesy audiogram it is
versity, 1954) is Associate Professor of Audi- most easily visualized as the amplitude
ology, Northwestern University. A portion
of this article is based on a paper presented of the oscillating trace. Bekesy (2), in
at the 1959 Convention of the American his original paper, noted that the
Speech and Hearing Association, Cleveland. amplitude became greatly diminished
This research was supported by research
grant B-1310 from the National Institutes of
in subjects with hearing loss accom-
Health, Public Health Service, and by the panied by loudness recruitment. He
United States Air Force under Contract assumed that the tracing amplitude
AF 41 (657)-185, monitored by the School of represented the first just-noticeable-
Aviation Medicine, USAF, Brooks Air Force
Base, Texas. difference (JND) in loudness and con-
Volume 3, No. 3 275 September 1960
cluded that a reduction in its size was progression toward higher and higher
compatible with the presence of an threshold intensity over time in retro-
abnormally rapid rate of loudness cochlear lesion.
growth with intensity (that is, loud- The present paper concerns the rela-
ness recruitment). However, Bekesy's tionship between Bekesy audiometry
assumption that the amplitude repre- and site of lesion within the auditory
sents the first JND has been questioned system. Unfortunately, almost every
by Hirsh, Palva, and Goodman (9), previous writer has confused this issue
who feel that the amplitude actually with a quite separate question, the re-
represents the variability about the lationship between the Bekesy tracing
absolute threshold. and the presence or absence of loudness
In any event, subsequent papers on recruitment. It must be emphasized,
Bekesy audiometry have dealt primarily therefore, that the present paper is not
with the amplitude aspect of the audio- concerned with how Bekesy audiom-
metric tracing (1, 7, 11, 17, 18, 21, 22, etry relates to loudness recruitment,
23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35, 36). The only with how it relates to site of
major point of view in this respect is lesion within the auditory system.
best exemplified by the very thorough
monograph of Lundborg (21). This Procedure
investigator obtained Bekesy audio-
grams on 50 normals, 25 cases of acous- Subjects. This report is based on the
tic trauma, 26 cases of Meniere's disease, Bekesy audiograms of 434 subjects
and 21 cases of diverse retrocochlear tested at the Hearing Clinic of the
lesion. He then classified the audiograms Northwestern U n i v e r s i t y M e d i c a l
into four types based on the tracing School over a three-year period. The
amplitude. There appeared to be a subjects were referred from various
rather precise relationship between sources for audiological evaluation. The
type of Bekesy tracing and site of majority were referred by otologists, a
lesion. Markedly reduced amplitude small number by neurologists and neuro-
was characteristically present in cases surgeons in the Chicago area. Although
with p r e s u m a b l y c o c h l e a r lesion no formal attempt at random selection
(acoustic trauma and Meniere's disease) was made, the series is fairly representa-
but characteristically absent in cases tive of the otologic case load in a large
with retrocochlear lesion. hospital environment. In most cases
Bekesy audiometry was performed as
In recent years increasing attention
part of a larger battery of auditory
has been given to another aspect of the
tests typically administered in a three-
Bekesy tracing, the change in threshold
hour test session. Although tracings
intensity over time as the subject traces
were ordinarily obtained on both ears,
threshold at a fixed frequency (4, 14,
subsequent analysis is confined to results
16, 19, 26, 27, 28, 37). Kos (16), Lierle obtained on only one ear of each sub-
and Reger (19), Jerger, Carhart, and
ject.
Lassman (14), and Yantis (37) have
shown very little change over time in Apparatus. All of the tracings on
presumably cochlear lesion, but marked which this report is based were ob-
tained w i t h a single Bekesy audiometer When I put these earphones on, you are
(Grason-Stadler, M o d e l E-800). T h e going to hear a beeping sound in your
ear. As long as you don't do anything the
rate of attenuation change was always sound will keep getting louder. But you
2.5 db per second, and the rate of fre- can make it fade away by holding down
q u e n c y change was always one octave this switch. When you let up on the switch
the sound will get louder again. Now,
per minute. T h e instrument offered here is what I want you to do. Listen
the option of a test signal that was very carefully, and, as soon as you hear
either continuous or periodically inter- the beeping sound, hold this switch down
until you can't hear it any more. As
r u p t e d in time. In the latter case, the soon as the beeping sound is gone, let up
interruption rate was 2.5 ips. on the switch until it comes back. Then,
as soon as you hear it again, hold the
T h e results r e p o r t e d below involve switch down until it goes away again,
t w o kinds of tracing, subsequently re- and so forth. The idea is ~o keep going
ferred to as 'conventional' and 'fixed- back and forth from where you can just
hear the beeping sound to where you
f r e q u e n c y ' tracings. In conventional can just not hear it any more. Never
tracings, the f r e q u e n c y of the test signal let the sound get very loud and never
m o v e d gradually u p w a r d from 100 to let it stay away too long. Hold this
switch down as soon as you hear the
10 000 cps. In fixed-frequency tracings sound, then let it up as soon as the sound
the f r e q u e n c y was preset and never is gone.
changed as the subject traced his thresh- F o llo win g these instructions a tracing
old over a t hree-mi n u t e period. was made w i t h the periodically inter-
In either case, a complete test always r u p t e d (I) test signal. A t the termina-
consisted of two separate tracings. In tion of this tracing the subject was
one the signal was periodically inter- reinstructed as follows:
rupted, in the second it was continuous Now we are going to do the same thing
in time. Both tracings, i n t e r r u p t e d and again, but this time the sound will be
steady instead of beeping on and off.
continuous, w ere always made on the Your job is still the same. Hold the switch
same piece of graph paper wi t h t w o down as soon as you hear the steady
sound, and let it up as soon as the steady
different colors of ink. It has been sound goes away.
f o u n d convenient to symbolize these F o llo win g these instructions a tracing
t w o conditions b y the letters T for was made w i t h the continuous (C)
i n t e r r u p t e d and 'C' for continuous in test signal. T h i s test order, interrupted
subsequent portions of this report. first and continuous second, was used
in all subjects. Instructions w e r e iden-
Method. A relatively rigidly stand- tical for either conventional or fixed-
ardized p r o c e d u r e of test administra- frequency tracings. When verbal
tion was initially designed, b u t could c o m m u n i c a t i o n was not possible, in-
not be followed rigorously in all structions we r e effected t h r o u g h pan-
subjects due to the occasional subject tomime.
whose ability to understand speech was
e x t r e m e l y limited. In a n y event, the Findings
following instructions w e r e used w h e n - A n initial a t t e m p t was made to ana-
ever verbal c o m m u n i c a t i o n was pos- lyse and score these Bekesy audiograms
sible: quantitatively. Various indices, such as
2O 2O
e~
.E 40
.~ 6(3 60
80 := 80
I00 I00
125 ?.SG 500 IK 2K 4K 8K 1?.5 ?_50 500 IK 2K 4K 8K
Frequency in cps Frequency in cp$
20 2O
.G
40 v " ~ 40 ., AA,AI AAAAaAA,k~ A 9
I
60 "v vvv [
9 60 VVV ' vVV~SA%
80 %~' = 80
v'~/~ I00
I00
125 250 500 IK 2K 4K 8K 125 250 500 IK ?.K 4K 8K
Frequency in cp$ Frequency in cp$
250 4K 250 4K
20 2O
.r
40
~ w w m
.~ 4o
60 W~Vv~
-r
80 8O
I00 I00
0 2 4 6 8 12 0 2 4 6 8
Tune in minutes Time in minutes
TYPE T TYPE 1T
I 1
250 IK 4K 250 4K
20 20
5: .c
_~ 40
Wv~ ] 40 ~/W Wvw V V ~ W
"~ 60 60 ~,A?,,^.,.~JV
80 80
I00
O 2 4 6
t 8
\
I0 12
I00
0 2 4 6 8 IO 12
Time in minutes Tlme~minu~
TYPE ~l" TYPE~
FIGURE 2. The four types of fixed-frequency Bekesy tracings. Green is interrupted; red,
continuous.
2O I00
'10
125 250 500 IK 2K 4K OK
Frequency in cps
40
A
~9 60 i j
I
250 4K
80 I ,
I00 2O
125 250 500 IK 2K 4K 8K
Frequency in cps .r
=9 4 0
A
I I I 9~" 60
IK 4K
I I
80
20 I00
2 4 6 8 I0 12
40 yw | i.,.- w
Time in minutes
8O
20 'If'
I00
125 250 500 IK 2K 4K 8K
"i6 4O
,AN Frequency in cps
.! vv/v'
.I~ 60
I I
250 4K
80 . I
I00 2O
125 250 500 v\lK ?-K 4K 8K
Frequerfcy in cps
4O
_=
60 ~A AAAAL~
I 8
250 4K
8O
20 I00
2 '4 6 8 I0
.r
"rime in minutes
4o
1
B
"~ 60 FIGURE 6. Preoperative c o n v e n t i o n a l a n d
8O
I00
I~ fixed-frequency Bekesy tracings in a 51-year-
old female with a surgically confirmed left
acoustic neurinoma: A, conventional tracings;
B, fixed-frequency tracings. Loudness recruit-
ment, as measured by the alternate binaural
2 4 6 8 I0 12
loudness balance test, was absent at 250, I000,
"lime in minutes and 4000 cps. The PB score at SL = 25 db
was 58%. Bekesy tracings are type IV.
TXBLE 1. Distribution of the four Bekesy types (I, II, III, IV) and of unclassifiable tracings (?) accord-
ing to presumed etiology of the hearing loss in 434 subjects.
Normal Hearing 33 0 0 0 0 33
Otosclerosis 50 2 0 0 2 54
Otitis Media 6 0 0 0 0 6
Other Conductive Loss 9 0 0 0 0 9
Meniere's Disease 4 26 0 1 1 32
Noise Induced Loss 7 15 0 0 0 22
Acoustic Neurinoma 0 0 6 4 0 10
Unknown Sensorineural Loss 54 119 0 12 10 195
Presbycusis 24 15 0 2 3 44
Otosclerosis Plus Sensorineural Loss 2 10 0 1 0 13
Sudden Onset of Loss 1 1 10 4 0 16
possibly include at least two and pos- Finally, it should be observed that
sibly three distinctly different kinds the present results are in accord with
of sensorineural loss. In presbycusis the the previous findings of Dix and Hood
situation is even more provocative. (4), Kos (16), Lierle and Reger (19),
Here, there are actually more type I and Yantis (37).
than type II tracings. It may be appropriate to cite two
Contrary to expectation, hearing loss possible bases for the lack of agreement
of sudden onset is primarily type III between the present results and the
and type IV, suggesting eighth nerve previous findings of Lundborg and of
rather than, or perhaps in addition to, Palva. First, the discrepancy may be
cochlear lesion. due to a simple artifact of instrumenta-
tion. Lundborg (21) states that, in his
Discussion Bekesy audiometer, attenuation changed
In certain respects the present results in 2-db steps, and Palva (24) states that
do not seem to be in very good agree- his audiometer changed in 1-db steps.
ment with the findings of some previous It may be that the momentary transient
investigators. Lundborg (21), for ex- energy introduced by each abrupt
ample, apparently observed nothing change in level made their continuous
like the present type III tracings in any stimuli more like the interrupted than
of his 21 cases of retrocochlear lesion. the continuous stimulus used in the
His Bekesy thresholds were apparently present study. In the Bekesy audiom-
in good agreement with the results of eter used in the present experiment,
conventional threshold audiometry. Nor successive changes in level were less
do Palva's (27) results on 39 cases agree than 0.25 db. This distinction between
with the present findings in fixed-fre- virtually continuous change and change
quency tracings. After four minutes of in small, discrete steps may very well
threshold tracing, there was a change be an exceedingly important variable.
of more than 10 db in only one of Jerger and Bucy (13) showed, for ex-
Palva's 33 perceptive losses. He con- ample, that only very brief silent inter-
eluded (26) that 'an abnormal loss in vals (10 to 20 msec) between successive
sensitivity is not common enough to short tones were sufficient to maintain
give reliable clues to differential diag- a stable horizontal tracing in a patient
nosis.' who readily demonstrated a type III
tracing under continuous stimulation.
The present findings are far more
encouraging. They show clear evidence Second, it should be observed that
of pathological adaptation (types II, with the exception of Dix and Hood
III, and IV) in 226 of 332 sensorineural (4), who used different instrumenta-
losses (68 % ). Furthermore, the manner tion, no previous investigator, to the
in which pathological adaptation ap- author's knowledge, has compared the
pears to be related to site of lesion sug- continuous threshold tracing with the
gests that Bekesy audiometry has the corresponding interrupted threshold
potential to become an exceedingly tracing. Apparently, all previous work-
sharp tool in the differential diagnosis ers have employed only a continuous
of hearing disorders. stimulus for either conventional or
nosis of end-organ deafness. Proc. R. Sac. 300 verified cases and the Btk~sy audio-
Med., 46, 1953, 992-994. gram in the differential diagnosis. Acta
5. EHMER, R. H., Masking patterns of tones. Otolaryng., Suppl. 99, 1952.
J. acoust. Sac. Amer., 31, 1959, 1115-1120. 22. MISKOLCZY-FODOR, V. F., The Btk~sy
6. EPSXEIN, A., and SCHtSBERX, E. D., Re- difference limen in bone conduction and
versible auditory fatigue resulting from recruitment. (in German) Pract. Oto.
exposure to a pure tone. Arch. Oto- Rhino. Laryng., 19, 1957, 282-288.
laryng., 65, 1957, 174-182. 23. MSLZZa, F., and NENZELIUS, C., An ac-
7. HEI~COCK, L., The measurement of cumulation of cases of neurogenous hear-
auditory recruitment. Arch. Otolaryng., ing impairment. Acta Otolaryng., 47,
62, 1955, 515-527. 1957, 158-166.
8. Hmsn, I. J., and BmCER, R. C., Audi- 24. PALVA, T., Absolute thresholds for con-
tory-threshold recovery after exposures tinuous and interrupted pure tones. Acta
to pure tones. J. acoust. Sac. Amer., 27, Otolaryng., 46, 1956, 129-136.
1955, 1186-1194. 25. PALVA, T., Cochlear vs. retrocochlear
9. Hmsn, I. J., PALVA, T., and GOODMAn, lesions. Laryngoscope, 68, 1958, 288-299.
A., Difference limen and recruitment. 26. PALVA, T., Recruitment testing. Arch.
Arch. Otolaryng., 60, 1954, 525-540. Otolaryng., 66, 1957, 93-98.
10. Hmsu, I. J., and WARD, W . D., Recovery 27. PALVA, T., Recruitment tests at low
of the auditory threshold after strong sensation levels. Laryngoscope, 66, 1956,
acoustic stimulation. ]. acoust. Sac. Amer., 1519-1540.
24, 1952, 131-141. 28. PALVA, T., Self-recording threshold audi-
11. HORMIA, A. L., Difference limen of in- ometry and recruitment. Arch. Otolaryng.,
tensity in hearing impairment due to 65, 1957, 591-602.
craniocerebral injury. Laryngoscope, 68, 29. RANTA, L. J., Acoustic and vestibular
1958, 808-813. disturbances following streptomycin-
12. Hvcrms, J. R., Auditory sensitization. treated tuberculous meningitis in children.
J. acoust. Sac. Amer., 26, 1954, 1064-1070. Acta Otolaryng., Suppl. 136, 1958.
13. JF~C~ER,J., and BvcY, P., Audiologic find- 30. RECEa, S. N., A clinical and research
ings in an unusual case of eighth nerve version of the Bekesy audiometer.
lesion. J. Hud. Res., (in press). Laryngoscope, 62, 1952, 1333-1351.
14. JERGER, J., CARHART, R., and LASSMAN, 31. REcv.a, S. N., and LIERta~, D. M., Changes
JoY~, Clinical observations on excessive in auditory acuity produced by low and
threshold adaptation. Arch. Otolaryng., medium intensity level exposures. Trans.
68, 1958, 617-623. Amer. Acad. Ophtbal. Oto-laryng., 58,
15. Kovax, L. L., Threshold recoveries for 1954, 433-438.
continuous and interrupted pure tones 32. Ri3~b L., Actions of vitamin A on the
following auditory fatigue. ]. acoust. Sac. human and animal ear. Acta Otolaryng.,
Amer., 27, 1955, 201. 44, 1954, 502-516.
16. Kos, C. M., Auditory function as re-
33. SCHULXrmSS,G. v., Evaluation of hearing
lated to the complaint of dizziness.
impairment due to industrial noise. Arab.
Laryngoscope, 65, 1955, 711-721.
17. LANDES, B. A., Recruitment measured by
Otolaryng., 65, 1957, 512-520.
automatic audiometry. Arch. Otolaryng., 34. TRIX'rmoE, W. J., Temporary threshold
68, 1958, 685-696. shift as a function of noise exposure
18. LxD~.~r, G., Loss of hearing following level. J. acoust. Sac. Amer.~ 30, 1958,
treatment with dihydrostreptomycin or 250-253.
streptomycin. Acta Otolaryng., 43, 1953, 35. WEDE~V_.a% E., Auditory tests on new-
551-572. born infants. Acta Otolaryng.~ 46, 1956,
19. LmRLE, D. M., and Ra~v.R, S. N., Experi- 446-461.
mentally induced temporary threshold 36. WEDE~-BV_at% E., Hereditary background
shifts in ears with impaired hearing. Ann. of auditory impairment; laboratory de-
Oto. Rhino. Laryng., 64, 1955, 263-277. tection of heterozygotes of deafness; a
20. Lxv_at~, D. M., and RECV.R, S. N., Further Bekesy-audiometric examination of par-
studies of threshold shifts as measured ents with children deaf from birth.
with the B~k~sy-type audiometer. Ann. Acta Otolaryng., 49, 1958, 451-452.
Oto. Rhino. Laryng., 63, 1954, 772-784. 37. YANXIS, P. A., Clinical applications of
21. Ltrt~BOR% T., Diagnostic problems con- the temporary threshold shift. Arch.
r acoustic tumors, A study of Otolaryng., 70~ 1959, 779-787,