Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Attenuation Project
Beverly Meyer
Objective: To determine the transmission factor for a wedge as it applies to monitor unit
calculation.
Methods and Materials: A Varian 2100 IX linear accelerator was used using 18 megavoltage
photon energy with 5 x 5 cm, 10 x 10 cm, and 20 x 20 field sizes. Different field sizes were
used to find an average since the ratio changes with field size. Solid water was utilized as the
phantom material along with an ion chamber which was connected to an electrometer measuring
the charge. Two trials each with 100 MU were conducted at each open field size, as well as one
each with a 30 degree wedge inserted both right and left. The 30 degree wedge was chosen since
it is the most severe.
Image 1: Solid water with ion chamber
Results:
Table 1: Readings taken with open fields, then wedge left and right, and attenuation factor.
Discussion:
The measurements were taken with the wedge oriented both right and left along long axis of the
ion chamber which results in the shortest distance across the wedge length. As expected, the
wedge decreases the output, so the effective MUs would increase. The wedge has three main
effects on the beam: the wedge hardens the beam, the skin dose increases due to scatter from the
wedge, and it changes the profile of the field by pushing dose to one side of the field. The
attenuation factor for the open 10 x 10 is 0.627 and 20 x 20 is 0.646; thus the average is 0.637
and is used for the patients treatment fields to show the clinical application of the wedge.
Clinical Application:
The patient was to receive palliative radiation treatment to the spine. By using the wedge factor
of 0.637, one can easily see how the MUs are higher for the wedge field. As seen by the
calculations performed on the machine with the wedge and output, the attenuation factor
essentially raises the MUs necessary to give the dose to the target by approximately 60%. This is
easily understood from the fact that the wedge attenuates the beam during the output experiment
discussed previously (see Table 1). RadCalc is used to perform secondary checks on treatment
plan MUs.
4
Table 2: The table below depicts the wedge factor introduced to the spine treatment.
If the wedge factor had not been placed into the calculation, then the MUs would not be
sufficient to deliver the dose through the wedge to the spine and it would be underdosed by
approximately 60%. In addition, if a wedge were placed and not needed (assuming the machine
would not give an accessory fault) then the effect would be the same: severe underdosing. On
the other hand, if a wedge were needed and not placed in the beam path, then the patient would
receive an overdose to the spine of 60% possibly leading to permanent damage.
Conclusion: Machines are calibrated to specific standards. When a patients treatment calls for
the deviation from said standard, then MU calculations must be performed taking into account
these changes. One such change to the calculation includes the introduction of a wedge to the
beams path. Wedges are used to push dose to one side of the patients treatment field. They
also attenuate the beam and increase skin dose. By performing this experiment, one can
calculate the wedge factor necessary to use in the MU calculation. It also evidenced the fact that
the wedge factor also changes with the field size.
5
References
1. Smith, J. Medical Dosimetry Concepts-Calibration and Calculations. [SoftChalk]. La Crosse,
WI: UW-L Medical Dosimetry Program; 2017.
2. Bentel GC. Dose determination for external beams. In: Radiation Therapy Planning. 2nd ed.
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1996:49-52.
3. Stanton R, Stinson D. Photon beam dosimetry. In: Applied Physics for Radiation Oncology.
Revised ed. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing; 2009.