Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ae
410 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 8, 410-415
Open Access
The Application of Improved Duncan-Chang Model in Unloading Soil
1
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China; 2Civil Engineering Depart-
ment, Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China; 3Civil Engineering Department, Guilin
University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
Abstract: On the basis of the representative samples of slity clay in Wuhan, China. The lateral unloading soils stress path
which is produced by excavating foundation pit engineering, is simulated through triaxial experiment. A series of consoli-
dated-drained true triaxial test and normal triaxial test has accomplished. According to the results of test, Studies are done
to decide the parameter of the Duncan-Chang Model. Use a modulus formula for the foundation soil in the lateral unload-
ing stress path tests to replace the modulus formula of Duncan-Chang Model based on the 3 = cons t . Apply the Duncan-
Chang hyperbola nonlinear elastic constitutive model to simulate the plane strain test, a method to improve the ability
of Duncan-Chang model to take into account the effects of the intermediate principal stress on the strength and defor-
mation have been presented and all the model parameters have been determined. The adaptability of the model to
the stress path of unloading engineering is verified by comparing the theoretical stress-strain relationship and test stress-
strain relationship.
Keywords: Foundation pit excavation, lateral unload, improved Duncan-Chang model.
saturation, with the consolidation of normal three axial test 2.3.1. Analysis of Duncan-Chang Model Parameters
confining pressure of isotropic consolidation, stay after con-
solidation, immediately shear the sample, 1 unchanged and
Li Shoude, Zhang Tuqiao, et al. Through the lateral un-
2 to vertical deformation of pressure control in the process loading stress path test, and analysis of the deformation laws
of shear (namely: 2 0 )), 3 is grade unloading, each
of the soil behind the wall lateral natural foundation consoli-
dation in foundation pit excavation unloading process, ac-
stage of unloading is 10KPa, the stress as the control varia-
cording to the hyperbolic hypothesis, and cited the calcula-
ble, recording the stress and displacement measurement in
each load case, the whole test process 1 2 3 .
tion parameters of Duncan-Chang model deformation modu-
lus formula is deduced for the natural soil excavation in
foundation pit lateral unloading process is as follows:
(1 sin )(1 k0 ) 1
2
E = Ei 1 R f
2 c cos + 2k0 1 sin
(1)
(1 + sin )( k0 1 3 )
2
1 R f 1
2c cos +
2sin (1 + sin )(1 k0 ) 1
n
Fig. (1). The stress-strain curves for drained test of normal triaxial.
Ei = kpa 3
According to the drainage of lateral plane strain condi- pa (2)
tions were true triaxial instrument under the unloading test
data analysis calculation, the stress strain relation curve as Using the true triaxial and normal triaxial in this topic are
shown in Fig. (2). isotropic consolidation, i.e. 1 = 2 = 3 , so K 0 = 1, then (1)
type into:
(1 + sin )(1 3 )
2
3
lg E = Ei 1 R f 1 (3)
pa 2c cos + 21 sin
3 ( kpa ) 3 / pa lg ( 3 / pa ) Ei ( kpa ) Ei / pa lg ( Ei / pa )
Fig. (3). The relationship between lg ( 3 pa ) and lg ( Ei pa ) . Fig. (4). The relationship between lg ( 3 pa ) and lg ( B pa ) .
C ( kpa ) Rf K n Kb m
! # ! #
"! "!
%)%'
%%
! !
"!
"!
"
"
! !
"! "!
$ $'&(
" !
!
"!
%)%
$($&
"
! !
"!
! ! #
"!
!
#&%' $'&(
(3 150 KPa) ( 3 300 KPa )
is obtained under various load of 1 accumulation, can draw soil will be in the specific calculation process, the calculation
the corresponding stress-strain curves. The curve and the test of large deformation of soil. Therefore, many domestic and
curve of Duncan Chang model income theory really three foreign scholars have put forward various methods in the
shaft under plane strain conditions as shown in Fig. (5). application of the model at the same time, trying to improve
the model, overcome its weaknesses. At present, the modi-
2. The main effect of stress 2 consideration
fied elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio and modified Mohr-
Because the Duncan-Chang model does not consider the colun two kinds of methods [6-8] have been proposed, this
intermediate principal stress on strength and deformation of topic here only one correction method for elastic modulus to
the 2 effect, thus resulting in low deformation modulus of simulation of plane strain test results, reflects the complex
414 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, Volume 8 He and Chen
C ( kpa ) Rf K n Kb m
stress strain characteristics of the stress state of degree to 2) Duncan Chang nonlinear elastic model is set up based
verify the improved model. Thus, provides the reference for on the normal triaxial loading test and constant confining
the selection of numerical analysis in geotechnical engineer- pressure conditions, for general loading conditions, the satis-
ing constitutive model. factory results can be obtained, but for the special loading
condition, there will be no reasonable case. The excavation
In order to consider the influence of intermediate principal
of foundation pit engineering, function of soil load mode is
stress of 2 , the original Duncan model of confining pres-
( )
sure 3 , 2 + 3 2 instead, partial stress 1 3 , ( ) different from the general loading, so the model is used to
( )
1 2 + 3 2 instead, keep the Mohr-colun standards
study the deformation of soil under the condition of plane
strain loading unloading is unreasonable.
unchanged, in order to consider the intermediate principal
stress 2 to the influence degree of stress strain characteris- 3) Tests of the plane strain damage deviatoric stress ratio
tics of stress paths. ( )
of 1 3 f three axial test is high, the failure strain corre-
The improved model for considering the influence of in- sponding than three triaxial test is slightly low, according to
termediate principal stress 2 model, so the corresponding the Mohr-colun failure criterion, plane strain test of angle
parameter change. Change the improved expression of tan- than three triaxial test is high, the three axis measured
gent modulus of elasticity model corresponding to: angle for plane strain problem is low, this is because the
main stress on the strength of the Mohr-colun does not con-
2
+
(1 + sin ) 1 2 3
sider the error produced in, and application of hyperbolic
model and plane strain problem mainly lies in the failure
E = Ei 1 R f 1 2
strength of selection, thereby causing calculation curve and
(4)
2c cos + 2 1 sin experimental curve of income difference.
4) In view of the influence of middle principal stress of
1) The parameters of the improved model Duncan Chang model without consideration, through im-
proved Duncan Chang model to consider the influence of
The improved Duncan Chang model parameters is still intermediate principal stress on the strength of soil, the cal-
seven original parameters of Duncan Chang nonlinear mod-
R
el, namely K, K b , m, n, f , c and , the improved model
culated curve derived from it can be seen that the Duncan-
Chang model curve after improvement is located in the for-
parameters can still obtained from the normal triaxial test. mer Duncan-Chang model, i.e. tangent the elastic model
The nonlinear elastic model of improved parameter values as curve after correction for the calculated was higher than the
shown in Table 6. original Duncan-Chang model results, this also makes the
2) Duncan-Chang modified hyperbola model for plane calculation more close to the curve of plane strain test curve,
problems but although the improved model improves the tangent mod-
ulus curve, but from the contrast can be seen from the graph,
The Duncan-Chang hyperbola model improved the
strain calculation prediction is still smaller than the experi-
method still uses such as for verification before unloading
mental value this can be explained, Duncan-Chang model for
soil in plane strain side of foundation pit excavation, the cal-
complex stress state of the stress strain properties reflect the
culated and experimental curves and the original Duncan
capacity is limited, has yet to be further improved.
Chang model calculated curves are drawn together, as shown
in Fig. (5).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CONCLUSION The authors confirm that this article content has no con-
flict of interest.
From the contrast can be seen from the graph, Duncan-
Zhang model calculated value and experimental value is
larger, and even with the modified Duncan-Chang model, the ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
calculated value and experimental value and anastomosis Declared none.
cannot be very good, the reason for this difference has the
following several aspects: REFERENCES
1) Duncan Chang nonlinear elastic model is established [1] S. D. LiT. Q. Zhang, B. T. Wang, and Z. F. Lu, Modulous for-
based on the conventional 2D model of normal triaxial test, mula for foundation soil under lateral unloading during excava-
model parameters were obtained by the ordinary normal tri- tion, Civil Engineering Journal, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 70-74, 2002.
[2] J. M. Duncan and C. Y. Chang, Nonlinear analysis of stress and
axial test, although the value of this parameter method is strain in soils, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Di-
simple and convenient, but will verify its application to 3D vision, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1629-1653, 1970.
in plane strain test will be for the calculation results impact.
The Application of Improved Duncan-Chang Model in Unloading Soil The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, Volume 8 415
[3] P. V. Lade, Elasto-plastic Stress-Strain Theory for Cohesionless [6] T. H. Lu and Z. D. Liu, Advanced soil mechanics, Beijing: Ma-
Soil with Curved Yield Surfaces, Soilds Structures, vol. 13, pp. chinery Industry Press, 2006.
1019-1035, 1977. [7] Z. L. Liu, Evaluation on developing level of unban agglomeration
[4] J. H. Qian, The principle and calculation of earthwork, Beijing: derived from resources exploration, Journal of Applied Sciences,
Chinese water conservancy and Hydropower Press, 2000. vol. 13, no. 21, pp. 4702-4707, 2013
[5] G. X. Li, Advanced soil mechanics, Beijing: Tsinghua University [8] X. Y. Zhang and S. W. Yan, Geotechnical plastic mechanics Foun-
press, 2004. dation, Tianjin: Tianjin University press, 2004.
Received: July 09, 2014 Revised: October 12, 2014 Accepted: November 1, 2014
He and Chen; Licensee Bentham Open.
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-
commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.