Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CATIA OLIVEIRA and PEDRO J. NOBRE
Departamento de Ciencias da Educaca
o, Universidade de Aveiro,
Aveiro, Portugal
The authors thank G. Santos, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal, for making
possible the collection of the clinical sample. They also thank A. Gomes, J. Almeida, P. Costa,
S. Vilarinho, L. Fonseca, J. Teixeira, P. Abrantes, for the suggestions and help in sample
collection. Last, they thank participants who volunteered to participate in the study.
Address correspondence to Catia Oliveira, Departamento de Educaca o, Universidade de
Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. E-mail: catioliveira@gmail.com
436
Role of Trait-Affect, Depression, and Anxiety 437
& Jardine, 1999; Lykins, Janssen, & Graham, 2006). Also, women with anxiety
disorders presented sexual problems involving the first phase of the sexual
response cycle, although the phases of excitement and orgasm seemed to be
unaffected (van Minnen & Kampman, 2000). However, experimental studies
conducted in women and men also suggested that anxiety had a neutral or a
facilitating effect on arousal response in both genders, probably because of
its direct effect on sympathetic activation (Barlow, 1986; J. G. Beck & Barlow,
1984). Laboratory studies (Elliot & ODonohue, 1997; Hoon, Wincze, & Hoon,
1977; Laan, Everaerd, Van Aanhold, & Rebel, 1993; Meston & Gorzalka,
1996; Palace & Gorzalka, 1990) showed that women with and without sexual
difficulties responded with higher sexual arousal during the view of an erotic
film, when it was preceded by an anxiety-type film, rather than by a neutral
film. The same pattern was found in men (Barlow, Sakheim, & Beck, 1983).
Clark and Watson (1991) proposed a tripartite model to understand the
nature and distinct features of anxiety and depression. The model comprises
negative affect, positive affect, and physiological arousal (associated with so-
matic tension, shortness of breath, dizziness, and dry mouth). Negative affect
was usually related to high distress and encompasses a variety of affective
states including anger, guilt, fear, worry, sadness, and disgust (Anderson &
Hope, 2008; Clark & Watson, 1991). Positive affect was generally related to
enthusiasm, activity, control, and compromise, incorporating the propensity
of the individual to maintain a positive view over time and across situations.
The absence of positive affect indicated loss of pleasure, hopelessness, apa-
thy, fatigue, lethargy, and psychomotor retardation (Aspinwall, 1998; Watson,
Pennebaker, & Folger, 1987).
Despite the accumulated knowledge on the association between state-
affect and sexual response and functioning, less is known regarding the role
of trait-affect.1 This is particularly important because trait-affect has been
widely studied and conceptualized as an important vulnerability factor for
depression and anxiety disorders, which are highly comorbid with sexual
dysfunction (L. A. Clark & Watson, 1991).
The present study was designed to assess the role of affect on womens
sexual functioning. Our main goal was to examine the relations among
trait-affect, depression, anxiety, and sexual functioning. Our theoretical as-
sumption is that trait-affect (specifically positive trait-affect) may have an
independent effect on sexual functioning, over and above depressive and
anxiety symptoms.
We expected that women with sexual dysfunction would present sig-
nificantly lower levels of positive trait-affect and higher levels of negative
trait-affect when compared with women without sexual dysfunction. We also
hypothesized that depression would partially mediate the relation between
1
The term trait-affect is used to differentiate it from state-affect.
Role of Trait-Affect, Depression, and Anxiety 439
positive and negative trait-affect and sexual functioning, and that anxiety
symptoms would partially mediate the relation between negative trait-affect
and sexual functioning.
METHOD
Participants
Participants were 237 women: a clinical sample of 17 women with sexual
dysfunction and a community sample of 220 participants (convenience sam-
ple). The community sample was divided to create a group with no sexual
difficulties (control group) and a group with low levels of sexual function-
ing (subclinical group), using the cutoff point of 26.55 (Wiegel, Meston, &
Rosen, 2005) of the Female Sexual Function Index (Rosen et al., 2000). Thus,
women who obtained a score below the cutoff point (a total of 37) were
included in the subclinical group. Participants who were not sexually active
during the past 4 weeks before completing the questionnaire (a total of 16)
were excluded from the study (to avoid the inclusion of these women in the
subclinical group because of their low scores on the Female Sexual Function
Index).
Procedures
Participants from the Clinical Group were recruited from the Sexology Clin-
ics of Coimbras University Hospital and of S. Joao Hospital (Porto) be-
tween January and October 2007 and diagnosed with sexual dysfunction
using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American
Psychiatric Association, 2000). A group of trained sex therapists initially con-
ducted a clinical evaluation using the Sexual Dysfunction Interview (Sbrocco,
Weisberg, & Barlow, 1992). After being diagnosed, the patients were ap-
proached by a member of the research team and invited to participate in the
study. Women who agreed to participate signed a consent form and com-
pleted the self-report measures, returning it in hand to a member of the team.
The response rate was 94% (proportion of the total number of approached
women who completed the measures).
Participants from the Community Group (convenience sample) were
recruited from central hospitals and small public community health cen-
ters from different regions of Portugal, between the months of April and
November 2007. A group of research students collected the sample in their
hometowns, particularly in the north and central regions of the country,
using nonrandom methods. Participants were contacted directly by the re-
search students and received instructions regarding the aim of the study.
Individuals who agreed to participate signed an informed consent form and
were instructed to complete the questionnaires in private and return them
440 C. Oliveira and P. J. Nobre
Measures
POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT SCHEDULEEXPANDED FORM
The Positive and Negative Affect ScheduleExpanded Form (Watson &
Clark, 1994) is a 60-item self-report questionnaire that assesses two ma-
jor emotional states: positive affect and negative affect; and 11 specific af-
fects: fear, sadness, guilt, hostility, shyness, fatigue, surprise, joviality, self-
assurance, attentiveness, and serenity. It allows the evaluation of the state-
affect (in the present moment, last days) or trait-affect (in general). Higher
scores indicate higher rates of positive and negative affect (minimum =
60; maximum = 300). Participants were asked to rate the list of emotions
with the specific instruction: Indicate to what extent you feel each of the
emotions presented, in general. Participants answered the questions using
a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5
(extremely). This version is an expansion of the original version, the Positive
and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), with only
20 items and two scales (positive affect and negative affect). Psychomet-
ric studies indicated adequate levels of internal consistency (positive affect:
Cronbachs = .85; negative affect: Cronbachs = .88), and testretest relia-
bility (positive affect: r = .71; negative affect: r = .70; Watson & Clark, 1994).
Both subscales were also correlated (positive affect: r = .56; negative affect:
r = .35) to the Beck Depression Inventory (Watson & Clark, 1994). The Por-
tuguese version (Vilarinho & Nobre, 2010) also showed appropriate internal
consistency (positive affect: Cronbachs = .88; negative affect: Cronbachs
= .66) and test-retest reliability (positive affect: r = .76; negative affect:
r = .47).
Data Analysis
To analyze the relation between trait-affect and sexual functioning, we con-
ducted a correlation analysis between the two affect dimensions, assessed
by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988) and the
Female Sexual Function Index dimensions (Rosen et al., 2000). We per-
formed a multiple regression analysis (enter method) using positive and
negative trait-affect as predictors and sexual functioning as criterion to ex-
plore the ability of trait-affect dimensions to predict sexual functioning in
women.
We also performed a multivariate analysis of covariance to study the
differences between women with and without sexual dysfunction regard-
ing both dimensions of trait-affect. The assumption of homogeneity of
variance-covariance matrices was met and the missing values were auto-
matically excluded. We used Bonferroni-corrected alpha levels for each
analysis.
Last, to test the mediational role of depression and anxiety on the re-
lation between trait-affect and sexual functioning, we conducted several
regression analyses according to Baron and Kennys (1986) procedure, for
testing mediational hypotheses. Specifically, we tested the mediational role
of depression (as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory total score)
and anxiety (as measured by the anxiety subscale of the Brief Symptom In-
ventory) on the relation between positive and negative trait-affect and sexual
functioning. The first three conditions for the test of mediation were met in all
the mediation analysis, and the Sobel (1982) test of mediation was conducted
for each one to determine whether partial mediation had occurred.
RESULTS
Sample Characteristics
The three groups (control group, subclinical group and clinical group)
showed statistically significant differences regarding age, F(2, 210) = 4.72,
p < .01, and educational level, 2 (2) = 24,92; p < .001. Participants from
the subclinical group were significantly older (M = 40.6 years, SD = 13.7)
in comparison with women from the control group (M = 34.2 years, SD =
10.5). Participants from the clinical group were less educated in comparison
with women from the subclinical and the control groups. The three groups
showed no differences regarding marital status, 2(8) = 6.69, p = .571.
The principal diagnoses assigned to women in the clinical group were
hypoactive sexual desire (47.1%), orgasmic disorder (17.6%), vaginismus
(11.8%), and sexual arousal disorder (5.9%). About 35.3% of the women
had other comorbid sexual problems.
The demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Role of Trait-Affect, Depression, and Anxiety 443
Age (years)
M 34.2 36.5 40.6
Range 1858 2267 1972
SD 10.45 12.6 13.7
n % n % n %
Marital status
Single 54 33.3 4 26.7 8 21.6
Married 80 49.4 9 60.0 26 70.3
Divorced 11 6.8 1 6.7 1 2.7
Widowed 3 1.9 1 2.7
Living together 14 8.6 1 6.7 1 2.7
Educational level (years)
04 3 1.8 4 26.7 1 2.7
56 5 3.0 1 6.7 5 13.5
79 17 10.3 2 13.3 10 27.0
1012 31 18.8 3 20.0 8 21.6
1315 3 1.8 2 13.3 1 2.7
16 or more 106 64.2 3 20.0 12 32.4
Affect dimension
TABLE 3. Multiple Regression Analysis (Enter Method) for Trait-Affect as Predictor of Female
Sexual Functioning in a Community Sample (N = 198)
Predictor B SE t p
Positive affect 2.61 0.65 .27 4.00 .000
Negative affect 1.70 0.54 .21 3.14 .002
p < .05. p < .01. p < .001.
Women with higher negative affect presented higher levels of sexual pain
and lower levels of sexual functioning (Female Sexual Function Index total
score).
The results of the regression analysis (Table 3) showed that trait-affect
significantly predicted sexual functioning in women, F(2, 195) = 13.00, p <
.001, explaining 10.9% of the variance (adjusted R 2 = .11). The analysis of
the standardized regression coefficients showed that positive and negative
trait-affect were significant predictors of female sexual functioning.
In the multivariate analysis of covariance, sexual functioning was used
as independent variable (1 = control group, 2 = subclinical group, 3 =
clinical group) and the two trait-affect dimensions as dependent variables.
We included educational level, age, marital status, depression, and anxiety in
the analysis as covariates to control their effects on the dependent variables:
For educational level, Wilkss = 0.984, F(4, 196) = 1.56, p = .214; for age,
Wilkss = 0.997, F(4, 196) = .271, p = .763; for marital status, Wilkss =
0.999, F(4, 196) = .073, p = .930; for total Brief Symptom Inventory, Wilkss
= 0.841, F(4, 196) = 17.74, p < .001; for total Beck Depression Inventory,
Wilkss = 0.928, F(4, 196) = 7.30, p < .01. After we controlled for the effect
of these variables, the multivariate test was statistically significant: Wilkss
= 0.939, F(4, 196) = 3.00 p < .05.
The univariate tests (see Table 4) showed a statistically significant effect
on positive trait-affect. The post hoc comparisons indicated that women from
the clinical group presented significantly lower scores on positive trait-affect
(p < .01, 2 = .05) when compared with women in the control group.
Positive affect 3.49a 0.04 3.28ab 0.09 3.08b 0.13 5.34 .006 .054
Negative affect 2.33 0.04 2.37 0.09 2.46 0.14 0.45 .636 .005
Note. Values adjusted for covariates. For each factor, adjusted means marked with different superscripts
differ significantly, according to Bonferroni test (p < .05).
p < .05. p < .01. p < .001.
Role of Trait-Affect, Depression, and Anxiety 445
TABLE 5. Regression Analyses for Testing Depression as Mediator of the Relation Between
Positive Trait-Affect and Sexual Functioning in a Community Sample (N = 202)
Criterion Predictor F R2
Total BDI Positive affect 18.80 .08 .30
Total FSFI Positive affect 16.85 .07 .28
Total FSFI Positive affect 24.69 .19 .17
(a) Total BDI .37
Total BDI Negative affect 49.11 .19 .45
Total FSFI Negative affect 10.20 .04 .22
Total FSFI Negative affect 21.78 .17 .04
(b) Total BDI .41
Note. (a) Sobel value, t = 3.60, p < .001; percentage of total effect mediated = 44%; (b) Sobel value,
t = 4.75, p < .001; percentage of total effect mediated = 83%. BDI = Beck Depression Inventory;
FSFI = Female Sexual Function Index.
p < .05. p < .01. p < .001.
TABLE 6. Regression Analyses for Testing Anxiety as Mediator of the Relation Between
Negative Trait-Affect and Sexual Functioning in a Community Sample (N = 202)
Criterion Predictor F R2
was significant and indicated that about 18% of the total effect of positive
trait-affect on sexual functioning was mediated by anxiety.
Last, the mediation of anxiety in the relation between negative trait-
affect and sexual functioning (Table 6) showed that the inclusion of anxiety
as a mediator variable resulted in an increase in the overall R 2, F(1, 199)
= 9.15, p < .001. The previously significant relation between negative-trait
affect and sexual functioning was reduced after anxiety was controlled. The
Sobel test was significant and indicated that about 61% of the total effect of
negative trait-affect on sexual functioning was mediated by anxiety.
DISCUSSION
This study examined the correlation between affect and womens sex-
ual functioning; specifically, we used a series of validated psychomet-
ric measures to analyze the correlations between positive and negative
trait-affect, depression, anxiety, and sexual dysfunction. Our main hypoth-
esis was that positive and negative trait-affect were associated with sexual
dysfunction, and that depression and anxiety would partially mediate this
relation explaining the high comorbidity among them.
Correlational analysis showed that negative and positive trait-affect were
associated and significantly predicted womens sexual functioning. However,
only positive trait-affect significantly differentiated women from clinical and
control groups, partially corroborating our hypothesis. These findings were
consistent with the current literature. The lack of positive affect seemed to
have a central and negative impact on sexual functioning (Adams, Haynes,
& Brayer, 1985; J. G. Beck & Barlow, 1986; Graham et al., 2004; Heiman,
1980; Laan et al., 1995; Meisler & Carey, 1991; Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2006).
Higher levels of positive mood and energy were usually significantly associ-
ated with greater sexual interest and the presence of pleasure emotions and
Role of Trait-Affect, Depression, and Anxiety 447
feelings (Blanchflower & Oswald, 2004; Elliot & ODonohue, 1997; Warner
& Bancroft, 1988), as well as with higher frequency of sexual intercourse
(Fortenberry et al., 2005; Sanders et al., 1983). The presence of negative
affect also seemed to be involved on sexual dysfunction in women (Brown,
Chorpita, & Barlow, 1998; Cyranowski, Frank et al., 2004; Nobre & Pinto-
Gouveia, 2006), although our findings were not so evident.
Results from the mediational analyses partially corroborated our hypoth-
esis. They showed that the relation between trait-affect and sexual function-
ing was mediated by depression and anxiety. Whereas the effect of positive
trait-affect on sexual functioning was partially mediated (44%) by depression
and anxiety (18%), the effect of negative trait-affect was partially mediated by
anxiety (61%) and almost completely mediated by depression (83%). These
results emphasized the possibility of a more specific and independent role of
the positive trait-affect on sexual functioning, when compared with negative
trait-affect.
It is still not clear how the absence of positive affect influences sexual
functioning. Nevertheless, studies showed that the existence of a specific
cognitive pattern in women with sexual dysfunction, similar to mood dis-
orders (Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2009), may generate negative automatic
thoughts and limit the process of erotic stimuli promoting low positive affect
(Bancroft, 1989; Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2003; Wiegel et al., 2005).
REFERENCES
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An in-
ventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561
571.
Beck, J. G., & Barlow, D. H. (1984). Current conceptualizations of sexual dysfunc-
tion: A review and an alternative perspective. Clinical Psychological Review, 4,
363378. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(84)90017-5
Beck, J. G., & Barlow, D. H. (1986). The effects of anxiety and attentional focus on
sexual responding: I. Physiological patterns in erectile dysfunction. Behavioral
Research Therapy, 24, 917. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(86)90144-0
Beck, J. G., & Bozman, A. W. (1995). Gender differences in sexual desire: The
effects of anger and anxiety. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 595612. doi:
10.1007/BF01542182
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical
study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 393415. doi: 10.1111/j.0347-
0520.2004.00369.x
Bodinger, L., Hermesh, H., Aizenberg, D., Valevski, A., Marom, S., Shiloh, R., . . .
Weizman, A. (2002). Sexual function and behavior in social phobia. Journal of
Clinical Psychiatry, 63, 874879.
Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Structural relationships among
dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of
negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 107, 179192.
Burleson, M. H., Trevathan, W. R., & Todd, M. (2007). In the mood for love or vice-
versa? Exploring the relations among sexual activity, physical affection, affect,
and stress in the daily lives of mid-aged women. Archives of Sexual Behavior,
36, 357368. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9071-1
Canavarro, C. (1999). Inventario de sintomas psicopatologicosBSI [BSI - Psychopat-
hological Symptom Inventory]. In M. Simoes, M. Goncalves, & L. Almeida (Eds.),
Testes e provas psicologicas em Portugal (pp. 94109). Braga: Apport/SHO.
Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Stewart, B. (1990). Cognitive specificity and positive-
negative affectivity: Complementary or contradictory views on anxiety and de-
pression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 148155.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psycho-
metric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
100, 316336.
Cyranowski, J. M., Bromberger, J., Youk, A., Mathews, K., Kravitz, H. M., & Pow-
ell, L. H. (2004). Lifetime depression history and sexual function in women
at midlife. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 539538. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.
0000044738.84813.3b
Cyranowski, J. M., Frank, E., Cherry, C., Houck, P., & Kupfer, D. J. (2004).
Prospective assessment of sexual function in women treated for recurrent
major depression. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 38, 267273. doi: 10.1016/
j.jpsychires.2003.08.003
Degoratis L. R. (1982). Self-report measures of stress. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz
(Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 270290). New
York, NY: Free Press.
Degoratis, L. R. (1993). Brief symptom Inventory. Administration, scoring, and pro-
cedures manual (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
450 C. Oliveira and P. J. Nobre
Sbrocco, T., Weisberg, R. B., & Barlow, D. H. (1992). Sexual Dysfunction Inter-
view (SDI). Unpublished structured interview, Center for Anxiety and Related
Disorders, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in struc-
tural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982
(pp. 290312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
ter Kuile, M. M., Both, S., & van Uden, J. (2010). The effects of experimentally-
induced sad and happy mood on sexual arousal in sexually healthy women.
Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 11771184. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01632.x
van Lankveld, J. J. D. M., & Grotjohann, Y. (2000). Psychiatric comorbidity in het-
erosexual couples with sexual dysfunctions assessed with the composite inter-
national diagnostic interview. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 479498. doi:
10.1023/A:1001995704034
van Minnen, A., & Kampman, M. (2000). The interaction between anxiety and sexual
functioning: A controlled study of sexual functioning in women with anxiety
disorders. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 15(1), 4757.
Vaz Serra, A. S., & Pio Abreu, J. L. (1973). Aferica o dos quadros clnicos depressivos.
I- Ensaio de aplicaca o de inventario depressivo de Beck a uma amostra por-
tuguesa de doentes deprimidos [Depressive disorders version I: Application of
the Beck Depression Inventory to a Portuguese sample of depressed patients].
Coimbra Medica, XX, 623644.
Vilarinho, S., & Nobre, P. (2010). PANAS: Psychometric characteristics of the por-
tuguese version. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Warner, P., & Bancroft, J. (1988). Mood, sexuality, oral contraceptives and the men-
strual cycle. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 32, 417427. doi: 10.1016/0022-
3999(88)90025-6
Watson, D., & Clark, L. (1994). Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule:
Expanded Form. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their
relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
97, 346353. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.97.3.346
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief
measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Person-
ality and Social Psychology, 54, 10631070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Watson, D., Pennebaker, J. W., & Folger, R. (1987). Beyond negative affectivity:
Measuring stress and satisfaction in the workplace. Journal of Organizational
Behavior Management, 8, 141157. doi: 10.1300/J075v08n02_09
Wiegel, M., Meston, C., & Rosen, R. (2005). The Female Sexual Function Index
(FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cut-off scores. Journal of
Sex & Marital Therapy, 31(1), 120. doi: 10.1080/00926230590475206
Copyright of Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy is the property of Routledge and its content
may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright
holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.