Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PERFORMANCE 1
Final Paper
Solomon Larsen
Biology 1615
Nicole Pearson
Many organisms have some way for making up for experiencing poor nutrition, however
these methods may result in negative effects that will not be known until much later in life. Some
possible results of poor nutrition early in life may include issues with body growth, and slower
cognitive performance later in life. Poor early nutrition prevents the body from growing,
however after receiving poor nutrition if you receive the nutrients you need your body will go
through a compensatory growth phase in which your body works to make up for the lack of
growth earlier in life. There is strong evidence that this also results in poor mental health, but it is
difficult to test whether this is because of poor nutrition or a result of the compensatory growth
By studying this topic they hope to find a way to cure or repair any mental or physical
damage that may have happened to an organism due to poor nutrition earlier in life
consequence of the compensatory growth that often follows the period of poor nutrition. In
other words if a person is having trouble learning later in life it is possible it could be caused by
either poor nutrition as they were growing, or caused by the compensative growth phase that
They set up the experiment by obtaining young zebras and birds. They tested on two pairs
of siblings, one pair was male, and one female, they put a female and a male in two groups they
COMPENSATORY GROWTH IMPAIRS ADULT COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE 3
gave one group the nutrition they needed to grow Group N, and the other experienced early
nutritional deficiency Group D. During the first 20 days they tested the effects of nutrient
deficiency, from day 20-70 they gave both groups normal nutrition and tested the compensative
growth that occurred after. To test the cognitive abilities they put each group through a course of
The results of this experiments were somewhat expected. After the nutritional deficiency
period day 1-20 there were no difference in the growth or cognitive abilities of the two groups
of zebras, after the post deficient period day 20-70 there were also no difference in growth, but
the group with the early poor nutrition took longer to learn the given tests then the group who
The results with the birds were a little different. After the nutrition deficiency phase, the
birds in Group D hadnt grown nearly as much as group N. After the compensatory growth
period day 20-70 both groups were nearly the same weight. When they tested the learning
abilities of each group, both groups passed but it took much longer for the birds from group D
to pass. The results from the birds were expected. The results for the zebras was somewhat
unexpected, they hypothesized that there would be a difference in growth and development of the
zebra that went through nutritional deprivation, but there was no change. Part of this could be
due to the fact there were many variables they havent been keeping track of for example they
Overall the scientists working on this learned a lot about the effects of poor nutrition. The
experiment supported their hypothesis for the most part, and this research gave them a better
References
Article Compensatory Growth Impairs Adult Cognitive Performance. Michael O. Fisher, Ruedi