You are on page 1of 21

SmartFren LTE Rollout Project

Cluster performance Report


City : Palembang
Frequency Carrier : 39050 & 39194 (TDD)
CLUSTER NAME/ID : NPLB_0
Cluster Type : Non Golden
Phase : 2C

SmartFren Radio Planning Team Nokia NPO Team


REVIEW/ACCEPT BY: REVIEW/ACCEPT BY:

NAME:________________________________ NAME:_________________________________

SIGNATURE:__________________________ SIGNATURE:___________________________

DATE:________________________________ DATE:_________________________________

Nokia YYY/MM/DD 0
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

Frequency CLUSTER Test Engineer Test date


Carrier NAME/ID
Frequency Carrier : 39050 & 39194
Technology
LTE 39050 & 39194 NPLB_0 Deddy 2-3 Dec 2016
Contents
1. Cluster Site Database.............................................................................................3
2. Coverage Prediction...............................................................................................3
3. Summary................................................................................................................4
4. Cluster Information................................................................................................5
4.1 Cluster Route...................................................................................................5
4.2 NPLB_0
Cluster performance Report
CLUSTER NAME/ID :
Site Information...............................................................................................5
5. Cluster Type : Non Golden
KPI Statistics..........................................................................................................6
5.1
: 2C
KPIs Table.......................................................................................................6
Phase
5.2 Throughput Distribution Graph.......................................................................7
6.
: TDD
Map View...............................................................................................................8
Technology
6.1 RSRP & SINR.................................................................................................8
6.2 DL & UL Throughput Plot..............................................................................9
6.3 20MHz Downlink Throughput Plot...............................................................10
6.4 Test Engineer : DT
MIMO Mode Plot..........................................................................................11
6.5 Test date : December 2016
MCS allocation Plot......................................................................................12
6.6 PCI Plot & EARFCN Plot.............................................................................13
6.7 MOS Plot.......................................................................................................14
6.8 CQI Plot.........................................................................................................15
7. OPTIMIZATION/ACTION.................................................................................16
8. Appendix..............................................................................................................17
8.1 Legends..........................................................................................................17
8.2 Blocking Routes............................................................................................18

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 1 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

1. Cluster Site Database


Table 1. Site Database
Sr E-NodeB
Vendor_ID Cell Name Long Lat TAC PCI Status
No ID
1
2
3

2. Coverage Prediction

Prediction RSRP
vs DT RSRP
Figure 1. Coverage Plot

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 2 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

3. Summary
Table 2. KPI Summary
Item Test Target KPI Achieved Pass/Fail
Accessibility RRC Connection Request Success Rate 99.00% #VALUE!
Accessibility VoLTE Session Setup Success Rate 99.00% 100% Pass
Retainability ERAB Drop Rate 1.00% #DIV/0!
Retainability VoLTE call drop rate 1.00% 0% Pass
Mobility Handover success rate 99.00% #VALUE! Pass
Integrity Average Handover Interruption Time 60ms NA
Integrity Average DL user throughput 30MHz NA 56036.84 NA
Integrity 5th Percentile DL user throughput 30MHz NA 29216.79 NA
Integrity Average UL user throughput-20MHz NA #DIV/0! NA
Integrity 5th Percentile UL user throughput-20MHz NA #NUM! NA
Integrity Average VoLTE Mean Opinion Score 3.7 Pending Pass
Integrity Average SINR 9.0 15.03 Pass

Note:
1. Average throughput for UL & DL are modified from Phase 1 KPIs since Phase2C uses
multiuser target, further justification using PRB is not applicable
2. SINR is added as new KPI
3. Golden or non-golden definition of the mini cluster will use existing boundary from phase 1.
4. Drive test attenuator will not be used in TDD. Smartfren will compare RSRP difference of
optimization and PAC from DT logs or they can join the PAC DT to ensure no attenuator was
used.
5. PAC DT and KPI approval will be based on mini cluster PAC concept (single site cluster, first
tier neighbor boundary)
6. In case the new site is located in new coverage cluster, mini cluster to be considered as non-
golden cluster in term of KPI acceptance
7. If KPIs as above table is achieved, PAC report will be approved by SF NPO/RF team.
However, Nokia will provide analysis and justification for remaining bad spot.
8. All optimization activities will be included in the PAC report hence there is no separate
optimization report for mini cluster acceptance
9. Artificial loading will not be used in any cluster since the KPIs are for multi user.
10. No throughput commitment for TDD non GC, since the coverage is still not continuous
4. Cluster Information
4.1 Cluster Route

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 3 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

Figure 2. Cluster Route

4.2 Site Information


Table 3. Site Information
Number of site Number of cell % on air site % on air cell
1 3 100 100

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 4 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

5. KPI Statistics
5.1 KPIs Table
Table 4. Accessibility
KPI Name # of attempt # of Successful attempt Success rate %
RRC Connection Request Success Rate NA
Handover Success Rate NA
VoLTE Setup Success Rate N/A N/A 100

Table 5. Retainability
KPI Name # of attempt # of Failure Failure rate %
ERAB Drop Rate #DIV/0!
VoLTE Dropout Rate N/A N/A 0

Table 6. Integrity
KPI Name # of attempt Average
Handover interruption time NA
VoLTE MOS N/A N/A
Average SINR 1447 15.03
Table 7. Throughput
Throughput - 5th
KPI Name # of Sample Average Throughput
Percentile
DL Throughput 30 Mhz 1447 29216.79 56036.84
UL Throughput 20 Mhz 0 #NUM! #DIV/0!

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 5 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

5.2 Throughput Distribution Graph


PDSCH Phy Throughput (kbps)
PDF CDF

70 120
62.4
60 100 100 100
50
80
40 67.93 32.07 60
30
40
Perc ent 20
10 20
4.01
0.35 1.17
1.52 5.53
0 0.35 0

Throughput

Figure 3. DL Throughput

PUSCH Phy Throughput (kbps)


CDF

1 12

0.9
10
0.8

0.7
8
0.6

Perc ent 0.5 6

0.4
4
0.3

0.2
2
0.1

0 0

Throughput

Figure 4. UL Throughput

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 6 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

6. Map View
6.1 RSRP & SINR

Figure 5. RSRP Plot

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 7 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

Figure 6. SINR Plot

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 8 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

6.2 DL & UL Throughput Plot


{image:CA_Tput_DL.jpg} >> Manually generated for CA
Figure 7. DL Throughput

Figure 8. UL Throughput

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 9 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

6.3 20MHz Downlink Throughput Plot

Figure 9. DL Throughput BW 20 Mhz

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 10 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

6.4 MIMO Mode Plot

Figure 10. MIMO Plot

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 11 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

MIMO Mode Graph


MIMO Mode

70
63.45
60

50

40 36.55

Perc ent
30

20

10

0
3 4 1 2

Rank Indic ator

Figure 11. MIMO Graph

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 12 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

6.5 MCS allocation Plot

Figure 82. MCS Allocation

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 13 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

Modulation and Coding Scheme Graph


MCS PDSCH

60
54.01

50

40 35.36

30
Perc ent

20
10.62
10

0
16QAM 64QAM QPSK

MCS

Figure 13. MCS Allocation Graph

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 14 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

6.6 PCI Plot & EARFCN Plot

Figure 14. PCI Plot

Figure 15. EARFCN Plot

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 15 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

6.7 MOS Plot


Figure 16. MOS Plot

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 16 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

6.8 CQI Plot


Figure 17. CQI Plot

SuperStream001-LTE_UE_WideBand_CQI_Average ()
Below 3.0 (0) 0.0%
>=3.0 to <6.0 (11) 0.8%
>=6.0 to <9.0 (442) 33.3%
>=9.0 to <12.0 (575) 43.3%
>=12.0 to <15.0 (297) 22.3%
Above 15.0 (4) 0.3%

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 17 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

7. OPTIMIZATION/ACTION
Table 8. Optimization

N Clust Spot Tec Analys Action Action Plan Bad Spot REMAR
o er Number h is Plan Status Status K
1

Based on Covplot SINR: there is no badspot

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 18 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

8. Appendix

8.1 Legends

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 19 (21)
Cluster Name : NPLB_0

8.2 Blocking Routes

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 20 (21)