Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/petrol
Abstract
Natural production from gas condensate reservoirs is characterized by gas condensation and liquid dropout in the reservoir,
first in the near wellbore volume, then as a cylindrical shaped region, dynamically developing into the reservoir volume. The
effects of liquid condensation are reduced productivity and loss of production. Successful forecast of well productivity and
reservoir production depends on detailed understanding of the effect of various forces acting on fluid flow in time and space.
The production form gas condensate reservoirs is thus indirectly related to the interplay of fundamental forces, such as the
viscosity, the capillary, the gravitational and the inertial force and their relative strengths, demonstrated by various
dimensionless numbers.
Dimensionless numbers are defined and calculated for all pressure and space coordinates in a test reservoir. Various regions
are identified where certain forces are more important than others. Based on reservoir pressure development, liquid
condensation and the numerical representation of dimensionless numbers, a conceptual understanding of a varying reservoir
permeability has been reached.
The material balance, the reservoir fluid flow and the wellbore flow calculations are performed on a cylindrical reservoir
model. The ratios between fundamental forces are calculated and dimensionless numbers defined. The interplay of forces,
demonstrated by these numbers, are calculated as function of radial dimension and reservoir pressure.
D 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Gas condensate; Fluid flow; Dimensionless numbers; Condensate saturation; Effective permeability
0920-4105/$ - see front matter D 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.09.005
254 J.-R. Ursin / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 41 (2004) 253267
lem. The general concern and uncertainty related to fluids. These forces are the viscosity (V), the capillary
well deliverability (Fevang and Whitson, 1996) and to (C), the gravitational ( G) and the inertial (I) force.
reservoir productivity in general are basically a result The viscous forces is commonly understood as the
of the continued liquid drop out in gas condensate intermolecular interaction within the fluid itself and
reservoirs. relative to the bounding conditions such as the pore
Reservoir modelling and numerical simulation of channel wall or other fluids. This force causes a
gas and gas condensate production depend clearly on velocity profile to develop across the flow channel
accurate descriptions of both fluid(s) and reservoir and is responsible for the viscous pressure loss in the
formations. In addition, proper understanding of fun- reservoir.
damental aspects of the dynamics of gas and liquid In the presence of two or more phases, i.e., gas and
condensate during production is certainly not to be liquid condensate, the interface between the two phases
underestimated. The basic understanding of funda- represents a pressure difference under dynamical flow
mental forces and their relative strengths can be conditions. The importance of capillary forces is relat-
directly related to the effective permeability (Ragha- ed to wettability in general and the spreading of the
van and Jones, 1996; Fulcher et al., 1983; Morrow wetting phase in particular (Coskuner, 1999).
and Songkran, 1981). The gravitational force is always active in all parts
In this article, we will discuss the various funda- of the reservoir. In reservoir fluid flow, the gravity
mental forces, their relative strengths and the variation force can be of importance in situations where the
in strengths as function of time and space. The fluids have different densities, as in the case of gas
purpose of this article is to present a principle set of and liquid condensate.
forces, the set of ratios between forces and on this The inertial force is associated with the redirection
basis, define a complete set of dimensionless numbers. of fluid flow in the porous media. In linear flow, i.e.,
These numbers are presented as function of pressure flow in a strait tube, no inertial forces are active. In a
and radius position in a cylindrical test model, simu- porous media, on the other hand, a continuous redi-
lating somewhat idealized reservoir conditions. rection of flow is taking place as the hydrocarbon
molecules are moving between the grain minerals.
At pressures lower than the dewpoint pressure The ratio of viscous and capillary forces is easily
( p < pdew), two hydrocarbon phases will be present illustrated by an example of linear flow in a cylindri-
in the reservoir. During the process of natural gas cal pore channel of length L and diameter 2R, as
production, four fundamental forces will act on the depicted in Fig. 1. The liquid condensate is believed
Fig. 1. Cylindrical pore channel for viscous and capillary pressure drop.
J.-R. Ursin / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 41 (2004) 253267 255
to wet the solid surface of the pore channel, and the Based on these assumptions, a capillary number NC
wetting angle is h. The flow of gas and condensate is which demonstrates the ratio of viscous over capillary
taking place at a constant pore velocity vg. forces can be defined,
The viscous pressure loss DPV, is the sum of the
pressure loss in the gas, DPg and in the condensate tg lo
phase, DPo. Using the Poiseuilles law, we may NC 4
rgo cosh
write
The ratio of the gravitational force over the capil- The force acting on gas molecules following a
lary force is thus circular path of radius Rr can be written
t2g
DPG Rd R Dqgo g DFI ADLqg ; 9
6 Rr
PC 3 rgo cosh
where A is the cross-section of the pore channel, DL is
If we associate the surface RdR/3 with an imagin- a line segment along the flow path and tg is the
able surface characterized by the absolute permeabil- average gas velocity.
ity k, of the porous medium, the ratio between the Using Poiseuilles equation for fluid flow in a
gravitational force and the capillary force can be cylindrical tube with a constant cross-section A = pR2,
expressed by the Bond number as presented above, the pressure drop per length is
kDqgo g DPI t2g
NB 7 qg : 10
rgo cosh DL Rr
N I=C N I=V =N C=V 13 The molar composition of the test fluid is given in
Table 1. The corresponding reservoir pressure and
temperature are 437 bar and 392 K, respectively.
N I=G N I=V =N V =G 14 PVT simulations, based on the data presented
above, have been performed using a commercial
available PVT simulator (PVTsim from Calsep), where
Finally, the following six dimensionless numbers the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) equation of state
can be defined: with the Peneloux molar volume correction is used.
The results of these simulations are presented in Fig. 4
for the viscosity data, where the calculations are based
rgo cosh on the corresponding states principles in the form
N C=V ; 15
tg lo suggested by Pedersen et al. (1984) and Pedersen
258 J.-R. Ursin / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 41 (2004) 253267
Table 1
Molar composition (in %) of gas condensate test fluid
+
Compounds N2 CO2 C1 C2 C3 iC4 nC4 iC5 nC5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10
Composition 0.78 8.72 71.00 8.56 4.67 0.71 1.23 0.41 0.41 0.45 0.66 0.70 0.41 1.29
and Fredenslund, (1987). Fig. 5 presents the interfacial k equal to 10 mD. The pore volume Vp of approxi-
tension data, calculated using the procedure of Wei- mately 4 106 Sm3 is produced at a constant surface
naug and Katz (1943), where the interfacial tension is flow rate, qg = 0.5 106 Sm3/day.
expressed in terms of the parachors of the individual The pressure profiles given in Fig. 7, represents the
components. In Fig. 6 for the density data. All varia- mean reservoir pressure p and the bottom hole pres-
bles, lo, lg, rgo, qo, qg and Dqgo are given as function sure pbh. As seen from this figure, the production
of pressure, ranging from 0 to 450 bar for gas variables period down to a minimum bottom hole pressure of 10
and from 0 to 367 bar (dew point pressure) for those bar is approximately 3.5 years.
variables describing liquid condensate behavior. The reservoir pressure distribution in time and space
can be represented by the following simple formula,
3.2. Reservoir simulations insuring a radially and logarithmic increasing pressure
distribution under semi steady-state flow conditions
In order to calculate the gas velocity vg, under
lnr=rw
reservoir conditions, simulation of gas flow has to be pr; t pbh t pt pbh t 21
performed. A custom-made reservoir simulation mod- lnre =rw
el has been used in these simulations, where idealized Fig. 8 shows the pressure field as function of time
reservoir conditions have been assumed. and radius position. The well skin is neglected (S = 0)
The reservoir is cylindrical shaped with the well at in the calculation above and similarly is the increased
the center position. The outer radius rw = 360 m and pressure drop induced by liquid condensation in the
the well radius rw = 0.175 m. The thickness of the reservoir not considered at this point. The numerical
reservoir, h = 50 m and the well is perforated along the representation of the pressure field shows that after a
whole reservoir thickness. Porosity and connate water certain time, the pressure in most parts of the reservoir
saturation are both 20%. The reservoir is homogenous is lower than the dew point pressure and that this
with an isotropically distributed absolute permeability situation prevails for about 3/4 of the total production
Fig. 4. Gas and condensate viscosity as function of pressure. Fig. 5. Interfacial tension as function of pressure.
J.-R. Ursin / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 41 (2004) 253267 259
period. Thus, the process of liquid drop out is active in The bulk velocity vg,bulk at a radial cross-section
most parts of the reservoir for most of the production Ares = 2prh in the reservoir is thus given
period.
Bg pqg;sc
3.3. Pore velocity vg;bulk r; p : 23
2pr h
The surface gas rate qg,sc is constant as pointed out The pore velocity is proportional to the bulk
above. Thus, the reservoir gas rate qg,res is given velocity, vg,pore = vg,bulk/(/(1-Swc) cos2(a)), where a
is the tortuosity angle, defining the crookedness of
qg;res p Bg p qg;sc ; 22 porous gas flow. / and Swc are the porosity and
where Bg is the volume factor for gas at pressure p. connate water saturation, respectively. The gas vol-
ume factor Bg is defined by using the extended real
gas law where liquid condensation in the reservoir is
represented by the surface molar liquid gas ratio. The
gas pore velocity is then written
1 Zp Tres
vg;pore r; p
/1 Swc cos2 a 2pr h Tsc
psc
1 RMLG p qg;sc ; 24
p
Fig. 10. Normalized ratio of viscous and capillary forces. Fig. 12. Normalized ratio of capillary and gravitational forces.
J.-R. Ursin / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 41 (2004) 253267 261
Table 2
Dynamic range of pore velocity and dimensionless numbers
relative range
1.3 10 1 V tg,pore V 6.4 103 4.8 104
3.9 102 V N(C/V) V 4.6 106 1.2 104
1.8 106 V N(C/G) V 2.3 107 1.2 101
2.1 104 V N(C/I) V 6.9 1011 3.3 107
1.2 100 V N(V/G) V 5.7 104 4.8 104
5.2 101 V N(V/I) V 2.6 105 5.0 103
9.1 10 4 V N( G/I) V 1.7 105 1.9 108
Fig. 13. Normalized ratio of inertial and viscous forces. Fig. 15. Normalized ratio of inertial and gravitational forces.
262 J.-R. Ursin / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 41 (2004) 253267
Fig. 16. Representation of forces and their region of importance 4. Effective gas permeability
relative to radial dimension and reservoir pressure.
Fig. 19. Formation of liquid condensate related to fluid phase and reservoir pressure draw-down.
high reservoir pressures ( p < pdew) the gravity force this, we may conclude that the endpoint relative
may be dominating. Under these conditions, the liquid permeability of liquid condensate will vary with the
may appear as pendant droplets, only partly restricting gas flow rate and thus that the relative gas permeabil-
the porous gas flow. As the pressure is reduced, the ity is rate dependent, i.e., krg = krg(Sg,p,qg).
relative strength of capillary force is increased, pro- The dynamical situation of gas flowing towards the
portional to the increase in the interfacial tension. As a wellbore, at decreasing reservoir pressure, will even-
result of this increase, a stiffening of the liquid tually cause the drop out of condensate in all parts of
interface and thus an increased hindrance of gas flow the reservoir (as in this example). The saturation of
is experienced (Singh et al., 2001). In the absence of liquid condensate as seen radially from the outer
viscous forces, but at the same level of condensate boundary of the reservoir (re) towards the wellbore
saturation, the effective gas permeability would vary will be a monotonically increasing function up to a
depending on the fluid pressure. This observation level of the critical condensate saturation where the
supports the assumption that the relative gas perme- liquid starts to flow. Closer to the wellbore, the
ability, traditionally presented as a function of satura- viscous force will reduce the liquid saturation due to
tion alone, also is dependent on the absolute pressure increased effect of shear forces (Kalaydjian et al.,
level, i.e., krg = krg(Sg,p). 1996). See also Fig. 18.
The amount of liquid condensate present in the
porous system, defined by the condensate saturation, 4.2. Reduced gas permeability
is obviously a very important factor in the assessment
of effective gas permeability (Bourbiaux, 1994). As The effect of liquid dropout in the reservoir during
the saturation of gas condensate increases above what normal production will undoubtedly lead to reduced
is commonly known as the critical saturation, two- gas permeability. The question is how much, where
phase flow will take place in the reservoir and the and when?
effective gas permeability is reduced accordingly. In The general behavior of the reservoir gas perme-
the presence of strong viscous forces, the critical ability in space and time will follow a functional form
saturation would most likely be lower than in those determined by the local gas saturation, where kg(Sg) is
parts of the reservoir where viscous flow is low. From some increasing function. The point here is not to
J.-R. Ursin / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 41 (2004) 253267 265
discuss the functional dependence of gas saturation, tion, condensate is produced into the well. As the
but more to give an interpretation, based on the bottom hole pressure continuously decreases, a radial
previous discussion, of the effect of fundamental pressure region, p < pdew, expands in to the reservoir
forces and their representation as dimensionless and reaches after a relatively short time (in this
numbers. In particular, it has been shown that due to example) the outer boundary, re. After this time liquid
viscous forces, there is a rate dependency, which condensate is produced in all parts of the reservoir,
increases the gas permeability near the well more at and the saturation of condensate is increasing towards
low absolute pressures than at high pressure. Similar- the wellbore. Gas permeability is reduced as the
ly, the interfacial tension will reduce gas permeability, saturation of liquid condensate is increased.
less near the well than further away, when the absolute This picture will gradually change as the bottom
pressure decreases. hole pressure is continuously decreased and the vis-
Based on calculations of dimensionless numbers as cous forces increases. At this time, the shear forces
seen above and the elaborations presented in the will become more important and gas saturation close
previous section, we may draw a model representing to the well will decrease. The mid-section of the
an imaginable picture of how we believe the gas reservoir will experience an increased liquid satura-
permeability will change in time and space. Fig. 20 tion both due to continued condensation but also due
represents such a model, where gas permeability is to flow of condensate into the region. These changes
normalized to one in the case of one-phase gas flow, in liquid saturation will lead to an increased gas
i.e., depicting relative gas permeability. permeability close to the well and a reduced gas
Early in the production period, when the pressure permeability in the mid-section of the reservoir. At
is above the dew point pressure, no liquid condensa- the outer part of the reservoir, gas permeability is
tion has jet occurred and the relative gas permeability higher than in the mid-section due to low liquid
is equal to one in all parts of the reservoir. The first saturation and relatively week viscous forces.
droplets of liquid are observed in the close vicinity of The extended reach of the viscous-dominated re-
the wellbore, leading to a moderation in gas perme- gion and the fact that liquid condensation will reach
ability. Further away from the well, gas permeability an over all maximum per pressure leads to a general
is unchanged. Above a certain critical liquid satura- increase in gas permeability. This increase is more
pronounced close to the wellbore and in the outer part
of the reservoir than in the mid-section, where the
liquid saturation is the highest.
5. Conclusions
Under the assumption of constant dry gas pro- qg,sc surface volume rate
duction, the rather complex process of reservoir tg,bulk reservoir gas flow rate
fluid behavior, involving liquid dropout in the tg,pors pore gas rate
reservoir and as a consequence, varying gas perme- rw well radius
ability, has been evaluated in the light of the re well radial boundary
dimensionless numbers. The relative gas permeabil- / reservoir porosity
ity has been estimated, based on the effect dimen- Swc connate water saturation
sionless numbers and the physical conception of Sg gas saturation
increasing condensate saturation in the reservoir. It a tortuosity angle
has been established that the relative gas permeabil- Z gas compressibility factor
ity in the reservoir is not only dependent of the Tres reservoir temperature
local saturation, but also on flow rate and absolute Tsc surface temperature
pressure. RMLG surface molar liquid gas ratio
Scc critical condensate saturation
Nomenclature S(r,t) reservoir saturation
L length of cylindrical pore channel krg relative gas permeability
R radius of cylindrical pore channel
h wetting angle
References
tg pore flow velocity
DPg pressure drop in gas region
Ali, J.K., Mcgauley, P.J., Wilson, C.J., 1997. The Effects Of High-
DPo pressure drop in liquid condensate Velocity Flow And PVT Changes Near The Wellbore On Con-
DPV total viscous pressure drop densate Well Performance. Paper SPE 38923 Presented At The
lg gas viscosity 1997 SPE Annual Technical Conference And Exhibition Held In
lo liquid condensate viscosity San Antonio, Texas, pp. 5 8. October.
PC capillary pressure drop Bourbiaux, B.J., 1994. Parametric study of gas condensate reser-
voir behavior during depletion: a study for development plan-
rgo interfacial tension (gas liquid) ning. Paper SPE 28848 presented at the European Petroleum
p general pressure Conference held in London, UK, pp. 25 27. October.
pdew dew point pressure Coskuner, G., 1997. Microvisual study of multiphase gas conden-
Rd spherical droplet radius sate flow in porous media. Transport in Porous Media 28, 1 18.
Coskuner, G., 1999. Performance prediction in gas condensate res-
g gravitational constant
ervoirs. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 38, 8
DpG gravitational pressure difference (August).
qg gas density Fevang, ., Whitson, C.H., Modeling gas-condensate well deliver-
qo liquid condensate density ability, paper 30714, SPE Reservoir Engineering, November
Dqgo density difference 1996.
k absolute permeability Firoozabadi, A., 1999. Thermodynamics of Hydrocarbon Reser-
voirs. McGraw-Hill. Book ISBN 0-07-022071-9.
Rr radius of circular flow path Fulcher, R.A., Ertekin, T., Sthal, C.D., The effect of the Capullary
DFI Inertial force Number and its constituents on two-phase relative permeability
A cross-section of flow path curves, Paper SPE 12170 presented at the 58th Annual Tech-
DPI inertial pressure difference nical Conference and Exhibition held in San Francisco, CA.
DL line segment October 5 8, 1983.
Henderson, G.D., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D.H., Al-Shaidi, S., Peden,
N(C/V) ratio of capillary and viscous forces J.M., 1996. Measurement and correlation of gas condensate
N(C/G) ratio of capillary and gravitational forces relative permeability by the steady-state method, Paper 31065.
N(V/G) ratio of viscous and gravitational forces SPE Journal. June.
N(V/I) ratio of viscous and inertial forces Kalaydjian, F.J.-M., Bourbiaux, B.J., Lombard, J.-M., 1996. Predic-
N(C/I) ratio of capillary and inertial forces tion gas condensate reservoir performance: how flow parame-
ters are altered when approaching production wells. Paper SPE
N( G/I) ratio of gravity and inertial forces 36715 presented at the 1996 SPE Annual Technical Conference
Bg gas volume factor and Exhibition held in Denver, Colorado, USA, pp. 6 9.
qg,res reservoir volume rate October.
J.-R. Ursin / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 41 (2004) 253267 267
Morrow, N.R., Songkran, B., 1981. Effect of viscous and buoy- 1998 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in
ancy forces on nonwetting phase trapping in porous media. In: New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 7 30. September.
Shan, D.O. (Ed.), Surface Phenomena in Enhanced Oil Recov- Raghavan, R., Jones, J.R., Delpletion Performance of Gas-Conden-
ery, pp. 387 411. In book. sate Reservoirs, Paper SPE 36352, JPT, August 1996.
Pedersen, K.S., Fredenslund, Aa., 1987. An improved correspond- Singh, M., Mani, V., Honapour, M.M., Mohanty, K.K., 2001. Com-
ing states model for the prediction of oil and gas viscosities and parison of viscous and gravity dominated gas oil relative per-
thermal conductivity. Chemical Engineering Science 42, 182. meabilities. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 30,
Pedersen, K.S., Fredenslund, Aa., Christensen, P.L., Thomassen, P., 67 81.
1984. Viscosity of crude oils. Chemical Engineering Science 39, Weinaug, C.F., Katz, D.L., 1943. Industrial and Engineering Chem-
1011. istry 35, 239.
Pope, G.A., Wu, W., Narayanaswamy, M., Delshad, M., Sharma, Williams, J.K., Dawe, R.A., Near-Critical Condensate Fluid Behav-
M., Wang, P., 1998. Modeling relative permeability effects in ior in Porous MediaA Modeling Approach, Paper SPE 17137,
gas-condensate reservoirs. Paper SPE 49266 presented at the SPE Reservoir Engineering, May 1989.