Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

===T Bilateral===

====Engagement is exclusively bilateral between governments, and


unconditional====
Kane, 8 US Marine Corps Major, thesis SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF OPERATIONAL STUDIES for
the USMC School of Advanced Warfighting (Brian, "Comprehensive Engagement: A
Winning Strategy " http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA504901) NSS =
National Security Strategy
Engagement strategies are not new. Since the end of the Cold War, engagement
AND
.10 This definition of engagement has been the most successful historically.11

===Rollback 1NC===

====Actions taken by the lame duck incumbent administration are subject to


reversal under the Congressional Review Act. Trump has promised to reverse any
midnight policy and punish the actor on a two-for-one basis====
Fechner, November 29 ("Use of the Congressional Review Act in the 115th Congress
to Overturn Obama Administration Regulations," Holly Fechner is a partner in the
public policy practice. Named a top lobbyist by The Hill. November 29, 2016.
http://www.natlawreview.com/article/use-congressional-review-act-115th-congress-
to-overturn-obama-administration)
In just five short weeks, the 115th Congress will convene in Washington. Now
AND
any other regulations that may face Congressional scrutiny early in the new
Congress.
====Therefore we offer the following ~~[conditional~~] counterplan: The USFG
will not enact the plan until after the inauguration of the next administration and
Congress, at which time the USFG will enact the plan.====

====Trump shields the counterplan from rollback Congress falls in line behind
Trump====
Prupis, November 15, 2016 (Nadia Prupis, staff writer, "Donning Trump's Red Hats,
RepublicansIncluding Former CriticsFall in Line,"
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/11/15/donning-trumps-red-hats-
republicans-including-former-critics-fall-line)
The normalization of President-elect Donald Trump continues on Capitol Hill, where
Congressional
AND
days. I think we're going to be able to do a lot."

===Climate Cp===

====Counterplan text: The USFG and China should do the plan if an only if both
China and the US agree to a climate agreement with concrete steps towards solving
climate change.====

====We must rethink globalization through better treaties.====


**Piketty**, 11/16/16 (Thomas Piketty, is professor of economics at the Paris School
of Economics. He is the author of numerous articles and books, including Capital in
the Twenty-First Century,"We must rethink globalization, or Trumpism will prevail",
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/16/globalization-trump-
inequality-thomas-piketty?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other)
Let it be said at once: Trump's victory is primarily due to the explosion
AND
taxation systems. If we fail to deliver these, Trumpism will prevail.
====Solves warming better than the aff because it is binding====

===Neolib===

====The AIIB is an exportation of neoliberal policy====


**Bourne**, Professor at Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology; University of
Melbourne Graduate, 11-27-**15** (Thane, Australian Institute of International
Affairs)
The AIIB's role in promoting economic development in Asia is currently very much a
case
AND
Asia remains a plausible and likely long-term outcome for the AIIB.

====Neoliberalism is an ideology of perpetual disaster locks-in widespread


inequality and environmental collapse only envisioning new alternatives can solve.
====
**Monbiot, 16** (George, best-selling author, staff writer for the Guardian,
"Neoliberalism the ideology at the root of all our problems," April 15,
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-
george-monbiot, CMR)
Imagine if the people of the Soviet Union had never heard of communism. The
AND
design a new system, tailored to the demands of the 21st century.

====The key question in the debate is how to build a society capable of


challenging institutional neoliberalism which is the root cause of their impacts.
Anything else is a distractionvoting aff justifies a neoliberal society as well as all
the impacts that come from it. The moral questions they raise are always secondary
to how we can grow profit. This means there is no way to advocate for the aff and
address neolib at the same time====
Frank and Reed 2014 *historian, author, and columnist for Harper's Magazine and
Salon; **professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania, specializing
in race and American politics. He has taught at Yale, Northwestern and the New
School for Social Research. An expert on racial and economic inequality, he is a
founding member of the Labor Party and a frequent contributor to The Nation (3/9,
Thomas Frank interviewing Adolph Reed, Jr., Salon, "We are all right-wingers now:
How Fox News, ineffective liberals, corporate Dems and GOP money captured
everything",
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/09/we_are_all_right_wingers_now_how_fox_news_ine
ffective_liberals_corporate_dems_and_gop_money_captured_everything/)
That's key: political economy. And you use the word "egalitarian."
AND
country now. . . . So there's stuff like that going on.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen