0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
19 Ansichten41 Seiten
In 1704 Newton published his treatise Opticks, this was 17
years after his great work Principia. He had waited until Robert Hook died,
since he had become so sensitive to criticism, especially from Hook.
Opticks was written in English, not the latin of Principia, and moreover,
was much easier to read. It was very popular and he revised it three times.
In 1704 Newton published his treatise Opticks, this was 17
years after his great work Principia. He had waited until Robert Hook died,
since he had become so sensitive to criticism, especially from Hook.
Opticks was written in English, not the latin of Principia, and moreover,
was much easier to read. It was very popular and he revised it three times.
In 1704 Newton published his treatise Opticks, this was 17
years after his great work Principia. He had waited until Robert Hook died,
since he had become so sensitive to criticism, especially from Hook.
Opticks was written in English, not the latin of Principia, and moreover,
was much easier to read. It was very popular and he revised it three times.
TREATISE ON LIGHT
CONTAINING 7
THE EXPLANATION OF REFLECTION AND OF RE-
FRACTION AND ESPECIALLY OF ‘THE RE-
MARKABLE REFRACTION WHICH
OCCURS IN ICELAND SPAR
BY
OHRISTIAAN HUYGENS
(Leyden, 1690)CONTENTS
Preface...
Table of Contents.
The Rectitinear Propagation of Rays and some General Considerations
concerning the Nature of Light. 7
Explanation of the Laws of Reflection
Explanation of the Laws of Refraction,
2
SRTREATISE ON LIGHT
BY
CHRISTIAAN HUYGENS
PREFACE
Tuis treatise was written during my stay in Paris twelve
years ago, and in the year 1678 was presented to the Royal
Academy of Sciences, to which the king had been pleased to call
me. Several of this body who are still living, especially those
who have devoted themselves to the study of mathematics,
will remember having been at the meeting at which I present~
ed the paper ; of these I recall only those distinguished gentle-
men Messrs. Cassini, Rémer, and De la Hire. Although since
then I haye corrected and changed several passages, the copies
which I had made at that time will show that I have added noth-
ing except some conjectures concerning the structure of Iceland
spar and an additional remark concerning refraction in rock-
crystal. I mention these details to show how long I have been
thinking about these matters which I am only just now publish-
ing, and not at all to detract from the merit of those who, with-
out having seen what I have written, may have investigated
similar subjects: as, indeed, happened in the case of two dis-
tinguished mathematicians, Newton and Leibnitz, regarding
the question of the proper figure for a converging lens, one
surface being given.
It may be asked why I have so long delayed the publication
of this work. ‘The reason is that I wrote it rather carelessly in
French, expecting to translate it into Latin, and, in the mean-
time, to give the subject still further attention. Later I
8