Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JohnB.Coffey
UniversityofKansas
2
AudienceandReaders
Thisbookhasbeencreatedforstudentsinthethirdgrade.Itwillprovidestudents
anopportunitytoreadaninformationaltexttheycanreadindependently,usingthekey
featuresembeddedintotheebook.Moststudentsinthethirdgradearereadingatthe
consolidatedalphabeticstage.Atthislevel,EhriandMcCormick(1998)argue,Students
shouldengageinmuchpracticeusingthevariousknowledgesourcesandstrategiesto
readwordsduringtextreadingsothatwordreadingbecomesautomaticandfluent
(p.156).Thefocusonteachingcomprehensionskillsandvocabularybecomesmore
prominent,asstudentsareaabletodecodeandunderstandvarioustextfeatures.
Topic
Everyday, students across the United States are being affected by airplanes. Some
of them fly to visit family and friends; other students live near busy airports. Nearly all of
them buy, use, or eat various products transported by aircraft. Flight is a very important,
yet many third graders are better able to identify a picture of Taylor Swift than the
inventors of the airplane. It is important that students know that air travel is now taken for
granted.
Throughout most of human history, such expedience was not possible. Here in
Ohio, students should be even more inclined to read about the Wright brothers because
they study Ohio history. The Wright brothers lived in Dayton; the state license plate
includes a picture of their plane; the major Air Force base is named for them.
CCSS.ELALiteracy.RI.3.7
Useinformationgainedfromillustrations(e.g.,maps,photographs)andthewordsina
texttodemonstrateunderstandingofthetext(e.g.,where,when,why,andhowkey
eventsoccur).
CCSS.ELALiteracy.RI.3.1
Askandanswerquestionstodemonstrateunderstandingofatext,referringexplicitlyto
CCSS.ELALiteracy.RI.3.4
Determinethemeaningofgeneralacademicanddomainspecificwordsandphrasesina
textrelevanttoagrade3topicorsubjectarea.
CCSS.ELALiteracy.RF.3.4
Readwithsufficientaccuracyandfluencytosupportcomprehension.
EbookFeatures
PrintFeatures
Thetextinthisbookwaswrittenina14pt.fonttomakeitmoreappealingtoyoung
readers.Subtitleswerepostedinabluetexttodrawattentiontoanewchapterinthe
book.Rarevocabularywordswerewritteninboldtoillustratetheirimportance.They
werealsoconnectedtoaglossaryforstudentstoutilize.Atableofcontentswasplacedat
thefrontofthebooktohelpstudentsfindcertainsections.Amaphasbeenincludedas
well.
Word Recognition
Students in the third grade, who are reading at the consolidated-alphabetic level,
easier [for students] to store longer words in memory (p.154); therefore, I have included
multisyllabic words in this text. I have also used some analogous words, so students can
learn new words by recognizing familiar ones. For example, the words gliding and
glider can be derived by the reader, once he or she becomes familiar with word glide.
Fluency
Fluency is one of the main pillars of literacy that has been identified by the National
Reading Panel. The focus is often on rate, accuracy, and expression, but comprehension is
becoming a fourth element of evaluation. Marcell (2011) illustrates that students are more
likely to be engaged in reading, understanding, and re-reading of texts, if they can read
One of the best practices that an e-book can offer is a narrated audio version of
the text being read by an experienced reader. This would be ideal, but the technical
difficulties of using a Macintosh with the CAST software made this task unpractical.
Vocabulary
Vocabularyacquisitionisamainobjectiveofthistext.Studentsinthirdgradeare
abletolearnandusemanymorewordsoncetheyhavereachedtheconsolidated
alphabeticstage.Twodozenvocabularywordshavebeenselectedfromvariousgrade
appropriatelists.Althoughthismanynewwordsforonetext,Brabham,Buskist,
Henderson,Paleologos,&Baugh(2012)arguethatvocabularyfloodscanbepowerful
toolstoimmersestudentswithrichvocabularywords.
Theauthorsrecommendhavingstudentsusethevocabularyinmeaningfulways.Instead
ofjustlearningthewordsindependently,studentsnowhaveatextthatincorporatesmany
ofthewordsinasingletext.Similarly,thewordsareusedrepetitively,whichhasbeen
5
showntobeabestpractice.Studentscanusetheglossaryinitially,iftheydonotknowa
word;however,manywordsareusedtwothreetimesinthetext,sostudentsshould
begintoretaintheirmeanings.
Comprehension
Severaltoolshavebeenusedthroughoutthetexttopromotecomprehension.The
picturesmaybeonethemosthelpfultoolsforstudents.Maderazo,Martens,Croce,
Martens,Doyle,etal.(2010)findthatwithyoungerstudents,Readingthepictorialtext
providedstudentswithanotherpathintothestorythroughwhichtoconstructmeaning
(p.445).Pictureswerecarefullyselectedtobebothinterestingandmeaningfultothetext.
Literalquestionshavebeenavoidedaswell.HarveyandGoudvis(2013)statethat
Answeringliteralquestionsistheleastsophisticatedpracticeofcomprehension(p.435)
Contrarily,thecomprehensionquestionsposedbythecoachesandattheendofthestory
areoftenopenendedquestionsthatrequireinferencestobemade.Theytapintowhat
HarveyandGoudvis(2013)callthecomprehensioncontinuum.Forexample,aquestion
isasked,WhatdoyouthinklifewouldbelikeiftheWrightbrothershadnotinvented
theairplane?
Theconceptsillustratedinthistextareasfollows:flightwasnoteasilyachieved,
theWrightbrothersdidsomethingquiteremarkable,andaircrafthaschangedtheworld
forever.
BeforeReading
Beforethestudentbeginsreading,fourquestionsareposedaboutairplanes.They
arebroadlystatedandmeanttopromptthestudenttothinkabouthisorherbackground
6
knowledge.ThenextpageshowsapictureofOrvilleWrightintheairplane.Another
questionisposedtothestudentaboutthepicture.
DuringReading
Studentsareaskedquestionsbythecoachthroughoutthetext.Captionsprovide
notesonthepicturestohelpthereadercomprehendthetext.Theglossaryhelpswiththe
unfamiliarvocabularywordsinthetext.
AfterReading
Attheconclusionofthetext,thereaderisaskedtocompareandcontrastthe
originalWrightFlyertoamodernaircraft.Fivecomprehensionquestionsareaskedatthe
conclusionofthetext.Onceagain,theyarehigherlevelquestionsonthecomprehension
continuum.
7
References
Brabham, E., Buskist, C., Henderson, S. C., Paleologos, T., & Baugh, N. (2012).
Flooding vocabulary gaps to accelerate word learning. The Reading Teacher, 65(8),
523-533.
Ehri, L.C. and McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: implications for
Harvey, S. and Goudvis (2013). Comprehension at the core. The reading teacher. 66:6, p
432-439.
Maderazo, C., Martens, P., Croce, K., Martens, R, Doyle, M. et al., (2010). Language