UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION
[“TRANSFERRED” FROM: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION]

JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE,

Plaintiffs,

versus Reassigned Case # 2:09-CV-00791-CEH-SPC

ROGER ALEJO; KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; ROGER

DESJARLAIS; LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LEE COUNTY VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; STATE OF FLORIDA, BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND; STATE
OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; CHAD
LACH; CHARLES “BARRY” STEVENS; REAGAN KATHLEEN RUSSELL;
KAREN B. HAWES; ROGER DESJARLAIS; CHARLIE GREEN; BOB JANES;
BRIAN BIGELOW; RAY JUDAH; TAMMY HALL; FRANK MANN; UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY(S); SEAN P. FLYNN; E. KENNETH STEGEBY; DAVID P.
RHODES; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON; CYNTHIA A. PIVACEK; JOHNSON
ENGINEERING, INC.; STEVEN CARTA; MIKE SCOTT; HUGH D. HAYES;
GERALD D. SIEBENS; STATE OF FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL;
WILLIAM M. MARTIN; PETERSON BERNARD; SKIP QUILLEN; TOM
GILBERTSON, RYAN LENGERICH, NEWS PRESS,
Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

DEMAND FOR RELIEF FROM JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

____________________________________________________________________________/

PUBLISHED NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM ORDER, “DOC. # 190”, “FILED 06/11/10”,

AND OF RECORD PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND, E.G., FAKE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS,
WHICH REQUIRED POLSTER CHAPPELL’S “DISQUALIFICATION” UNDER, E.G.,
28 U.S.C. § 455; 28 U.S.C. § 144

DEMAND FOR RELIEF FROM CORRUPT JUDGE POLSTER CHAPPELL’S CRIMES

ON THE PUBLIC RECORD, E.G., DOC. ## 189, 190, 213, 214
 PUBLISHED NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM DOC. # 190, AND

OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION & CONCEALMENT UNDER COLOR OF “O.R. 569/875”

1. Hereby, the Plaintiffs appeal from “order denying 144”, “Doc. # 190, 06/11/2010”. Here,

Defendant corrupt Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell was under absolute obligation to again

disqualify herself, because Chappell perpetrated unlawful and criminal acts outside the scope

of any “immunity” and/or “official capacity”. Here, the Plaintiffs had sued both Chappell and

Honeywell in their private individual capacities. In particular, Defendant “judicial whore”

Sheri Polster Chappell was under the same recusal obligations as Defendant recused Judge C.

E. Honeywell. See 28 U.S.C. § 455; 28 U.S.C. § 144.

CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT UNDER COLOR OF FAKE “CLAIM” “O.R. 569/875”

2. Here, Defendant Crooked Judges Polster Chappell and Honeywell conspired with other

Defendants and Officials to extort real property and fees from the Plaintiff unimpeachable

record landowners “under color of, e.g.,” prima facie extortion and fraud scheme “O.R.

569/875”, fake “land parcels”, and a facially fraudulent and unlawful judgment. See, e.g.,

Doc. # 365; Case # 2:2007-cv-00228. In multiple Cases, both Defendants conspired to

fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ fundamental Constitutionally protected rights to own their

record property and exclude Defendant Government(s).

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL SCAM “O.R. 569/875” & JUDICIAL COVER UP

3. Said Defendants knew that constructive notice required any purported “instrument” to be

recorded “as prescribed by law.” The law in Florida never recognized facially

incomprehensible bogus “claim” “O.R. 569/875”. In particular, said U.S. Defendants knew,

concealed, and conspired to conceal that under Florida law a recorded “document” provides

no notice unless it can be located by title search. Otherwise, a buyer in good faith who has

2
 conducted a diligent search would be charged with knowledge of documents no one can find.

Here, no person could have possibly found any instrument, resolution, legislative act, law,

muniment of title, and/or record of prima facie incomprehensible scam “O.R. 569/875”.

RECORD APPEAL FROM DOC. # 210

4. The Plaintiffs appealed from Defendant crooked U.S. District Judge Honeywell’s “order”,

Doc. # 210, “filed 06/22/10”. Here, said judicial Defendant evaded and obstructed mandatory

disqualification in this Case, because Honeywell had “disqualified herself” in related and/or

associated Case 2:2010-cv-00390 on the very same day, 06/22/2010.

HONEYWELL’S OBJECTIVE LACK OF QUALIFICATION ON THE RECORD

5. Defendant Polster Chappell knew that judicial Defendant Honeywell affirmed, Doc. # 213, p.

5, that the Plaintiff record owners of “Lot 15A”, riparian Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A,

“appeared for a “quasi-judicial proceeding”, because the Plaintiffs were the record owners

of “Lot 15A”. See public records on file admittedly affirming Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable

ownership of Lot 15A.

6. Here, the Plaintiffs “appeared for” said “proceeding”, because they were the affirmed record

owners of Lot 15A and entitled to appear. Therefore here, crooked Judge Honeywell’s

fraudulently and idiotically pretended, Doc. # 213, p. 5:

“In a resolution adopted in December 1969 by the Board of Commissioners of Lee

County, Florida, Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land
(“Resolution 569/875") (Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9).”

3
 HONEYWELL’S 06/22/2010 DISQUALIFICATION / RECUSAL, 2:2010-cv-00390

7. On 06/22/10, Def. crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell “disqualified herself”. See

Order, Doc. # 3, 2:2010-cv-00390. The “public land” had never existed:

DEF. HONEYWELL’S PREMEDITATED & DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS

8. On 06/22/2010, Honeywell premeditated and conspired with other Defendants to deliberately

deprive the Plaintiff record landowners of their fundamental right to own their riparian Gulf-

front lands, subject Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as legally described and conveyed in

reference to the 1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County Plat Book 3,

Page 25. See, e.g., Doc. # 213, filed 06/23/10.

PUBLIC TAX RECORDS EVIDENCED HONEYWELL’S FRAUD SCHEME

9. In particular, Honeywell knew that the Plaintiff unimpeachable record property owners had

paid real property taxes for said subject Parcel. See attached public records of Lee County

Tax Collector; Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A.

10. Here, Honeywell fraudulently concealed the dispositive evidence that the Plaintiffs were the

unimpeachable record “owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in Lee County,

Florida.” See Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th

Cir. Apr. 21, 2009):

“I. BACKGROUND
A. Current Action

4
 The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in
Lee County, Florida. On May 5, 2008, the Appellants filed the present pro se
complaint against numerous state and county officials n1 alleging that they had
violated the Appellants' constitutional rights with respect to their Cayo Costa
property. Most of the allegations in the complaint concern the 1969 Lee
County Resolution 569/875, which claimed the undesignated areas on the east
and west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision plat and all accretions thereto as
public land to be used for public purposes. The Appellants' Lot 15A is on the
west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision on the Gulf of Mexico and is
adjacent to land that was claimed through Resolution 569/875 to create
the Cayo Costa State Park.”

11. In particular, Defendant corrupt Judge Honeywell fraudulently pretended on the public

record, Doc. # 213, p. 5:

“I. BACKGROUND 4
Plaintiffs allege that they are the owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa Subdivision of
Lee County, Florida (Dkt. 1, ¶1; Dkt. 5, ¶1). In a resolution adopted in December
1969 by the Board of Commissioners of Lee County, Florida, Lot 15A, among other
property, was claimed as public land (“Resolution 569/875") (Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9). See
Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir.
Apr. 21, 2009); Busse, et al. v. Lee County, Florida, et al., 317 Fed. Appx. 968, 970
(11th Cir. Mar 5, 2009).”

HONEYWELL’S BRAZEN RECORD FRAUD ON THE COURT & CRIMES

12. Here, crooked Honeywell knew and fraudulently concealed that

a. The Plaintiffs were the unimpeachable record owners of said “Lot 15A”;

b. No “resolution” had ever existed;

c. No “resolution 569/875” had ever existed;

d. No “resolution” had ever been “adopted”;

e. No “resolution” had ever “claimed” Plaintiffs’ “Lot 15A”;

5
 f. No “resolution” could have possibly involuntarily divested the Plaintiff record

property owners and record property tax payers of their riparian Gulf-front Lot

15A.

EMERGENCY OF HONEYWELL’S CRIMES ON THE RECORD

13. Here, Honeywell’s fraud, fraud on the Court, and corrupt & criminal acts were an

EMERGENCY. Here, the prima facie criminality, idiocy and irrationality of Honeywell’s

acts were an EMERGENCY.

EMERGENCY OF LIEN & SIMULATANEOUS GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP CLAIM

14. Here, Honeywell knew that her co-conspirator and fellow judicial Defendant Sheri Polster

Chappell had fraudulently made an order for the illegal Governmental seizure of said “Lot

15A”. See fraudulent “writ of execution” and fraudulent “lien”.

15. Here, Defendant Government Officials could not possibly “seize” that which Honeywell

fraudulently pretended was “public land”. Here pursuant to the public record, as dispositively

affirmed by, e.g., said U.S. Court of Appeals and Defendants Lee County, the Plaintiffs held

exclusive record title to their “Lot 15A” and had paid any and all property taxes as

conclusively evidenced by the public record:

6
16. Here, Honeywell’s record stupidity alone disqualified her:

a. How could Government possibly “seize” what Defendant Governments fraudulently

“claimed” to be “Government owned”?

b. Why did Honeywell unintelligently contradict the 11th Circuit’s dispositive

affirmation of the public record evidence of Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable land
ownership, see Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97
(11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009).

c. Why did Honeywell corruptly and idiotically contradict Defendants’, Lee County,
FL, record affirmation of Plaintiffs’ publicly recorded ownership of said “Lot 15A”:

7
8
9
10
 FACIALLY DECEPTIVE STATEMENTS AND OBJECTIVE INCOMPETENCE
17. Here, no fit, intelligent, honest judge in Chappell’s and Honeywell’s shoes could have
possibly refused disqualification. In particular, no fit, intelligent, and honest judge in
Honeywell’s shoes could have recused herself in Case # 2:2010-cv-00390 and refused
mandatory recusal in this Case.
HONEYWELL’S CASE FIXING ON THE RECORD, DOC. # 213
18. Here prior to 06/22/2010, Honeywell had premeditated Case fixing by criminal means of

fraudulently pretending that Plaintiffs’ “Lot 15A” was “public land”, Doc. # 213, p. 5.

CONCEALMENT OF GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AS “ADVERSE RULING”

19. On 06/22/2010, Honeywell “disjointedly” and “unintelligently” pretended that

“Adverse rulings are not grounds for recusal.” See 2:2009-cv-00791, Doc. # 210, p. 3.

Here, Honeywell’s facially deceptive material misrepresentation of Plaintiffs’ record land

ownership was not an “adverse ruling”, but prima facie trickery, deception, and fraud on the

court. Here, intelligent and rational “analysis” was impossible, because Honeywell deceived

the Court about the record ownership of Lot 15A and fabricated that Plaintiffs’ land had been

“claimed as public land”. Here, no “legal description” of Plaintiffs’ Lot 15A had ever even

appeared in fake “resolution 569/875”, and no “resolution” could have possibly involuntarily

transferred any title to Lee County as affirmed by the public record. See Prescott, et al., v.

State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009). Here, the

very grounds for Honeywell’s “disqualification”, Doc. # 3, equally applied in 2:09-cv-00791

and required Honeywell’s recusal. Here, Honeywell acted capriciously so that she could

unlawfully fix Plaintiffs’ Case on 06/22/2010. See Doc. 213. Here, Honeywell “frivolously”

responded and characterized, e.g., Governmental CORRUPTION, concealment, fraud, and

conspiracy to deliberately deprive, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, as “adverse rulings”.

11
12
 BRAZEN CORRUPTION & CONCEALMENT ON THE RECORD

20. Here, Defendant Honeywell brazenly concealed the above record of Plaintiffs “state court

proceeding”, Case # 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, www.LeeClerk.org:

21. Here Honeywell knew that judicial co-Defendants and co-Conspirators John Edwin Steele

and Sheri Polster Chappell had removed said state court proceeding from State to Federal

Court, 2:2008-cv-00899 (12/05/2008).

22. In her record pattern and policy of CORRUPTION, Honeywell again rambled

“incomprehensibly” and never got to the well-proven legal issues complained about such as,

e.g., CORRUPTION and fraud.

CORRUPT HONEYWELL’S CONTEMPT OF THE LAW

23. Honeywell was in contempt of the law and obstructed justice & application of the law.

Defendant Honeywell had personal knowledge of the Government CORRUPTION &

CRIME SCHEMES. Personally, Defendant Honeywell employed, e.g., the “frivolity” and

“vexatiousness” cover-up scheme and obstructed justice.

HONEYWELL’S CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CORRUPTION AND COVER UP

24. In particular, Defendant Honeywell concealed and conspired to conceal, e.g.:

• Fake “lot” and “block” numbers such as, e.g.:

o “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;
o “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
Neither fake “lot” “00A0” nor “block” “00001”ever existed. See PB 3, PG 25.
• Fake “Government ownership” claims of fake “parcels”;

13
 • Fake “transaction(s)” such as, e.g., “O.R. 569/875”;
• Fake “land” “parcels”;
• Fake “frivolity” “defenses”;
• Fake “vexatiousness” “claims” and “contentions” unwarranted under existing law;
• Fake “legal descriptions” such as, e.g.:

”ALL UNNUMBERED AND ACCRETED LANDS”

Here, Honeywell concealed that the prima facie fake “claims”, contentions, and “defenses”

on the record had no possible legal basis and were “frivolous” and unlawful.

HONEYWELL’S “PERSONAL [CORRUPTION] KNOWLEDGE” REQUIRED RECUSAL

25. Here, Honeywell had “personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the

proceeding”. See Doc. # 210, p. 2. Here, Honeywell personally discussed with other Judges,

Government Officials, and Defendants the “disputed evidentiary facts concerning the

proceeding”, and how to fix Plaintiffs’ Cases and conceal record CORRUPTION evidence.

Here, Honeywell had “personal knowledge” of well-proven Government CORRUPTION and

concealment of Government crimes.

26. Here, Honeywell is most likely to be a material witness in the Government CORRUPTION

proceedings, 28 U.S.C. 455(b).

PUBLICATIONS OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION & DEF. HONEYWELL’S CRIMES

27. The Plaintiffs have been publishing the conclusive record evidence of public CORRUPTION

and fraudulent concealment worldwide at multiple social publication and news sites, as well

as www.YouTube.com, and Google Blogs. See, e.g., www.scribd.com/Judicial_Fraud.

14
 CONCLUSIVE & UNCONTROVERTED PROOF OF CORRUPTION ON FILE

28. By presenting to this Court pleadings, written motions, and other papers, the Plaintiffs had

certified that to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry

reasonable under the circumstances, Def. Honeywell criminally concealed and conspired to

conceal well-evidenced Government CORRUPTION and fraudulent Government “claims” of

“Government ownership” of non-existent and forged “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-

00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”.

29. “Frivolity” and “vexatiousness” were not any “defense” and not warranted under existing

law. Here, crooked Honeywell presented “sanctionability” and “frivolity” for unlawful

purposes such as to harass the Plaintiffs, cause unnecessary delay, and needlessly increase

the cost of litigation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11.

30. No competent, honest, and intelligent judge in Polster Chappell’s and Honeywell’s shoes

could have possibly concocted that the proof of Government CORRUPTION and fake “land

parcels” on the record was “not meritorious”.

31. No intelligent, fit, and professional judge in Chappell’s & Honeywell’s shoes could have

possibly perverted Florida’s Eminent Domain, Adverse Possession, and Record Marketable

Title Act the way Honeywell did. Here, Honeywell’s dishonesty, incompetence, and threats

on the record have been terrorizing and punishing. The Plaintiffs feared for their fundamental

rights and have been suing Honeywell, PRESCOTT v. HONEYWELL, Case # 2:2010-cv-

00390-36-DNF.

32. Here, Honeywell had “personal knowledge” that Defendants’ fraudulent denials of Plaintiffs’

factual contentions were not warranted on the record evidence and not reasonably based on

belief or a lack of information. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b).

15
33. Objectively CORRUPT and partial Defendant Judge Chappell’s & Honeywell’s fraudulent

perversions of Plaintiffs’ well-proven factual contentions were not warranted on the record

evidence and not reasonably based on belief or a lack of information. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

11(b).

34. Pursuant to the public record evidence, Honeywell’s belief and policy were CORRUPTION

and terror, and the Plaintiffs object to the CORRUPTION and CRIMES on the record.

35. Here Honeywell concealed the prima facie criminality and nullity of, e.g., forged “land”

“parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” and Government

ownership claims and fake “defenses” in the record absence of any Government title

evidence.

36. The record conclusively proved Honeywell’s intimidating contempt of the law, and in

particular of, e.g., Chapters 712; 73, 74; 95, Florida Statutes; and Florida and Federal

Constitutions.

HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO FALSELY PRETEND RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS

37. Idiotically and corruptly, Honeywell fraudulently pretended “ripeness requirements” for,

e.g., claims of record 4th, 1st, 14th, and 7th U.S. Const. Amendment violations, fraud, and

CORRUPTION. See Doc. # 213.

38. Here, Plaintiffs could directly assert, and rightfully asserted, their claims for relief from, e.g.,

Government CORRUPTION and fraud in Federal Court. Honeywell knew that no ripeness

requirements had ever existed.

39. Here, the Plaintiffs rightfully defended against Honeywell’s NAZI-style terror and

CORRUPTION and demanded EMERGENCY relief from Honeywell’s well-proven fraud

16
 upon the Court and legally “incomprehensible” bogus contentions of “frivolity” and “public

land”.

40. Here, the Plaintiffs had pleaded, e.g., fraud and fraudulent concealment in both State and

Federal Courts. See State Case # 2006-CA-003185; www.LeeClerk.org.

41. Here, Honeywell fraudulently concealed that the Plaintiffs paid property taxes and held

perfected marketable title to said “Lot 15A”. Here, Honeywell’s “order”, Doc. # 213,

constituted prima facie premeditated and deliberate deprivations under color of office and

authority. Here, Honeywell had no authority to pervert the public record and obstruct justice.

See Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr.

21, 2009).

42. Here, Honeywell knew that the Lee County Attorney had categorically ruled out any

possibility of any Lee County ownership of Plaintiffs’ property, 12/29/2000 Memorandum:

17
18
 HONEYWELL’S COVER-UP FOR FELLOW JUDICIAL GANG MEMBERS

43. Here like a brainless parrot, Honeywell merely repeated the null and void orders by the

named judicial Defendants. Because the Plaintiffs had demanded relief from said null and

void orders by judicial Defendants such as, e.g., Steele, Polster Chappell, Pizzo, Lazzara,

which were based on facially fraudulent and legally impossible “Government ownership”

“claims”, Honeywell was obligated to review de novo and use a brain. However here,

Honeywell never reviewed anything, but repeated the same old judicial trash on the record

and continued to pervert the public record just like said fellow judicial Defendants had. Here,

by her own admission more than one hundred (100) pages of Plaintiffs’ Complaint had never

even been filed (see Doc. # 1):

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand

1. An Order recusing Defendant corrupt Judge Sheri Polster Chappell under 28 U.S.C. § 455

and 28 U.S.C. § 144;

2. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-

00015.015A as evidenced in Plaintiffs’ Complaint and pleadings;

3. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as affirmed by the public record;

19
4. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs’ record ownership by the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.

Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);

5. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11th

Circuit U.S. Appellate Court, Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE v. LEE COUNTY;

6. An Order compelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why the grounds for “her

disqualification”, Doc. # 3, Case 2:2010-cv-00390, did not absolutely demand her recusal in

this Case;

7. An Order compelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her “rulings” were not

NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false “frivolity” and

“vexatiousness” pretenses and the concealment of said fake “legal descriptions”, fake “land”

“parcels”, and fake “Government ownership” “claims” and contentions;

8. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judges Chappell & Honeywell,

because they disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants,

perverted the facts of record, and could not possibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28

U.S.C. § 455; 28 U.S.C. § 144.

/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff, pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295
____________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff, pro se
State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;
JRBU@aol.com

20
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell
HONEYWELL’S EXTORTION:
FAKE “resolution”

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial_Fraud
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial_Fraud
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial_Fraud
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial_Fraud