Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Human Variation
Hector Robles
Human Variation
Human variation can be explained through different lenses. Notably it is almost always
explained through two different perspective. It is explained from those who are in a branch that is
explain through science. Then we have those who stand in a cultural standpoint. Both giving us a
clear understanding of what human variation is to ones own, with both giving credibility to their
opinion through supporting statements. Both standpoints are trying to dismantle the opposing
sides opinion to give credibility to ones own opinion. A constant battle between both sides of
the party.
In the article Genes and Hormones: What Make Up an Individuals Sex we are
introduced to the gendered body and how it comes forth to being the gendered body that it is.
Daniela Crocetti, the author of this academic journal explores the many different ways on how
science acts on human variation by introducing us to genes and hormones and how they are the
determining factors in the gender biological body, challenging any other view through her
respective work.
Not much changes when we transition to Gary D. James as he shines light on human
variation through his own interpretation. His article Climate-Related Morphological Variation
and Physiological Adaptions in Homo Sapiens talks about human variation with regards to
environmental adaptability and how theres a correlation between the diversity of the climate and
human variation.
Both these articles give their respective opinions about human variation from a scientific
stand point while supporting their opinions with academic research along with thoughts of their
own. In my article, Ill be challenging both Daniela Crocetti and Gary D. James and their articles
HUMAN VARIATION 3
to expose to you the dichotomy between the perspectives of science and culture upon human
variation.
We are introduced to the scientific perspective in Daniela Crocettis article Genes and
Hormones: What Make Up an Individuals Sex. Here we see our author Daniela Crocetti
backing up her claim that the gender body is created through a complex network of
A myth that we see Daniela Crocetti is the myth that states that sex chromosomes are the
biological factors determining phenotypic sex. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 29) Which is not the case, as
many experts now know just because one carries an XX sex chromosome does not mean that
they are to look or feel like a female. The same goes for those that carry an XY sex chromosome
indicating that theyre male. This does not indicate ones biological sex, theres more that meets
the eye in this situation. This is a multiplex topic where we cant assume that theres a simple
answer to the discussion that were talking about. As stated in the article, scientific research
and medical practice frame chromosomes and hormones as creating absolute masculinity as
opposed to a spectrum of biological and physical gender types. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 27)
Scientific research has allowed us to broaden are way of seeing things and has allowed us
to challenge old assumptions. We are introduced to this concept that where we are exposed that
new research indicates that female fetal formation is also an active process, requiring other
genetic makers such as DAX-1 and WTN4. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 29) Exposing us that theres
more to the formation of a female than the typical XX sex chromosome. This backs up Daniela
Crocetti claim where she states that theres more to the pictures when indicating what a female is
and what a male is. What are informed by the article that is true when it states that XX induvial
are not always biologically female or XY individuals are not always biologically male.
HUMAN VARIATION 4
(Crocetti, 2013, p. 28) Typically this has been the norm but its up to science to break this norm
by challenging it.
We know that the norm associates males with XY and females with XX and that there
stereotypes surrounding what a female is and what a male is. We are introduced to this through
the article as it states that gender role often represents culturally specific stereotypes and
activities, gender identity refers to which of the gender categories one self-identifies with,
regardless of stereotyped behavior. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 29) Break down the gender binary and for
us to be nondiscriminatory.
Growing up weve learned that theres two gender, male and female. Theres people who
fit neither or in other cases theres people who fit both. This causes discomfort which is why are
to accept and acknowledge those dont fit in the typical male and female spectrum. The objective
here is to be inclusive, this is important to those who identify themselves as transgender and
gender nonconforming people. Were complex people which is why we should push to fight this
norm.
Theres a group of individuals who suffer from DSD, commonly known as disorders of
sex development. A study showed that disorders of sex development occur in 1 in 2000 people,
making this a common disorder. These individuals suffer severely. These individuals are different
from the rest because of their gender components. These individuals as the article stated suffer
from the stigma of the medical treatment that they receive in childhood. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 28)
This is due to the norm that we have that biologically we could only either be female or male, not
taking into recognition that we have individuals who suffer from disorders of sex development
because of stigmas.
HUMAN VARIATION 5
Recent studies have showed that in newer models, the development of the body is seen
to be highly influenced by the functions and processes of development, not just genetic
material. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 26) Some of the external factors that have influenced the functions
and processes of development instead of genetic material is the environment in which one is in.
Another interesting statement found in this article is that by having male gonads does
not make a person a man. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 28) This claim backs up Daniela Crocettis claim
that states that chromosol material is not the primary determining factor in the gender biological
body. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 31) This reveals that the gender body is something much more
complex and that chromosol material is not the only form on determining ones gender with
regards to biology.
explanations/solutions for our material. We are broadening our perspective because of this and
we are as well challenging our old perspectives. We live in an innovative society who is always
Individuals Sex She makes it clear that although she has supported many of her claims with
academic research, theres still a lot of information to be discovered surrounding this topic.
Daniela Crocetti ends her article by giving the reader a nice take home message by stating that
That the gender body is created through a complex network of interactions, and it will only be
when we eliminate all of our assumptions about what maleness and femaleness are that we will
be able to see how it all really works. (Crocetti, 2013, p. 31) This statement is given out to
HUMAN VARIATION 6
encourage individuals for them to become more open minded and less ignorant when taking the
What makes up an individuals sex within my culture is by who does what tasks. In
simpler terms if one is to do hard work labor within a population that individual would be
considered a man. If an individual were to do the light work that doesnt require much strength
one would be considered to be a female. These stereotypes are the stereotypes within my culture,
An individual within the Mexican culture is considered to be a male when they are the
ones to protect the population from anyone who causes harm. A male is the dominant one in this
situation, they are the ones that keep stability within the population. The female in this situation
is typically considered to be the vulnerable one who cant take care of ones self and has to rely
on the man.
A male is considered to be a male within the Mexican culture when they are the ones that
bring food to the table. What this means is that the male is the one that works all day and earns a
paycheck to make sure that theory family has its necessities required to live. While the female
does not to do this instead the female does not earn a paycheck rather the females job being of
Within the Mexican culture what makes up an individuals sex is not their genes or
hormones but rather the tasks that they are required to do thatll make them either female or
male. The norm within the Mexican culture is that if youre the male youre the dominant key
player whereas if youre a female youre of importance but not of great importance compared to
the male. These are norms that as stated in Danielas Crocetti that we should break for the benefit
of all.
HUMAN VARIATION 7
Physiological Adaptations in Homo Sapiens. In this article climate plays a big role with the how
human variation is shaped. We are also introduced to how Homo sapiens have adapted to certain
climates.
We are introduced with the idea that climate plays with a role with human variation when
the article states that homeotherms from colder climates, the limbs are shorter than in equivalent
animals from warmer climates. (James, 2010, p. 31) The length of limbs is associated with the
climate that one is stationed at. As we can see climate isnt the only external factor that plays a
role in human variation but also the environmental temperature plays a big role in the body form
of human.
Our need for adapting to cold climate plays a role with as to how human variation plays
out within us. The human body is of many wonders and we see this through how our body is able
to adapt to cruel climates, such as cold weather. Some human bodies are able to adapt to cold
climates better than others by increasing the insulation of their body core through a generalized
(Frinsacho 1993).
Just like cold climates theres some humans that are able to adapt to high altitude just fine
as opposed to others. This is a trait that favors some more significantly than others. Natural
selection favors one set of crowd more than another and its all due to the environment that they
live in and what they are accustomed. Which is why a group of people who have lived in high
altitude for decades are more favorable to live in high altitude as opposed to someone who has
been living at sea level. Natural selection in this scenario favors those who have lived in high
altitude.
HUMAN VARIATION 8
Although science has its way of interpreting human variation with regards to climate,
culture as well has its way of interpreting human variation through climate. Within my culture,
the Hispanic people, but more specifically the Mexican people also people that climate plays a
role with human variation. Although both science and the Mexican culture believe that human
variation is associated with climate they both have different ideas as to how they are associated
The Mexican culture believes that the majority of its people do well in warm climates due
to the color of their skin. The color of their skin being brown allows them to not get burnt as
easily. For example, someone who has brown skin can withstand the heat much better and for a
longer time as opposed to someone who has lighter skin. We being exposed to a warm climate
has allowed our skin to being the brown rich color that it is and because of this color variation
our time exposed to the warm climate isnt as bad as someone who has lighter skin color than
Another example as to how my culture sees human variation with regards to climate is
that we believe that the crowd within our culture has oily skin due to the warm climate that we
are in. The oily skin explains why the majority of our people have skin diseases. The Mexican
culture believes that the oily skin diseases comes from the warm climate that we are always
exposed to. This is an unfavorable trait that our population has suffered with. Although it could
be a good trait, it could also be a bad trait. Human variation does not favor the Mexican culture
Culture and science view climate different with regards to human variation but just
because it is viewed different between the two does not mean that they dont have the same
HUMAN VARIATION 9
concept. That concept being trying to explain why the human body is the way it is by viewing the
Science and culture are always bumping heads with one another claiming that ones
interpretation is favorable rather than the others. Theres a difference between the two points of
view, but both perform to the best of their ability when trying to explain how human variation
works. Ive brought to your attention and to light the dichotomy between the perspectives of
science and culture upon human variation in their own respectful manner.
HUMAN VARIATION 10
References
Crocetti, D. (2013). Genes and Hormones: What Make Up an Individuals Sex. In M. Ah-King
(Ed.), Challenging Popular Myths of Sex, Gender and Biology (pp. 23-32). Switzerland:
Springer International.
Homo sapiens. In C.S. Larsen (Ed.), A Companion to Biological Anthropology (pp. 153-166).
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
HUMAN VARIATION 11
HUMAN VARIATION 12
HUMAN VARIATION 13
HUMAN VARIATION 14
HUMAN VARIATION 15
HUMAN VARIATION 16
HUMAN VARIATION 17
HUMAN VARIATION 18
HUMAN VARIATION 19
HUMAN VARIATION 20