Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • 09-08-13 Sturgeon V La County (BC351286) at The Los Angeles Superior Court - #14 - DR Zernik's Motions Vol II Part8a p492-641-31

    Hochgeladen von

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    178 Ansichten80 Seiten
    Executive Summary Los Angles, July 15 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against James A Richman – Justice of California Court of Appeal, First District, Charles McCoy – Presiding Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, and others of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and deprivation of rights, relative to their conduct in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286). The complaint alleged that the named accused conspired to conduct pretense litigation in the case of Sturgeon v Los Angeles County, where Justice Richman presided with no authority at all and where judgments were falsely represented as entered by him in the case. · Court records showed that Justice Richman routinely referred to himself as presiding in the case as “judge by assignment”. However, no Assignment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law. · Court records further showed that the Los Angeles Superior Court, a party to the same litigation, routinely referred to Justice James A Richman as a presiding “by reference” in the case. However, no Appointment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law for a Referee. · Plaintiff’s counsel referred to Justice James Richman as “designated” to preside in the case. However, no designation record was ever found in the case, either. The complaint noted that no judgment was ever entered in the case, as required by California Code to make it “effectual for any purpose”. However, “not official” court records, published online by the court, falsely represented judgments by James A Richman in the case - in favor of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles Superior Court and against Plaintiff Sturgeon. Requests, which were forwarded to Justice Richman, to clarify the legal foundation for his authority to preside in the case, were left unanswered. In addition, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke were alleged in the complaint as engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to violate First Amendment rights relative to denial of access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) and other records in the case. The complaint alleged that through such conduct the Clerk and Presiding Judge continue to cover-up the fraudulent nature of the litigation in the case. The case of Sturgeon v LA County held the highest public policy significance, since it pertained to the taking of “not permitted” payments by Los Angeles County judges, which were called by media “bribes”. Therefore, the complaint alleged that through such conduct, the named accused conspired to deprive all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County of the prospect of honest court services, due process, and fair hearings in years to come. Conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles Justice system was described already in 2001 by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, as “conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states…”, and the Blue Ribbon Review Panel recommended already in 2006 external investigation of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Regardless, the April 2010 report, filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations, documented ongoing refusal of senior officers of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law in Los Angles County, California, and to accord equal protection to its 10 million residents. The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010. Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the just

    Originaltitel

    09-08-13 Sturgeon v La County (BC351286) at the Los Angeles Superior Court - #14- Dr Zernik's Motions Vol II Part8a p492-641-31

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    Executive Summary Los Angles, July 15 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against James A Richman – Justice of California Court of Appeal, First District, Charles McCoy – Presiding Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, and others of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and deprivation of rights, relative to their conduct in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286). The complaint alleged that the named accused conspired to conduct pretense litigation in the case of Sturgeon v Los Angeles County, where Justice Richman presided with no authority at all and where judgments were falsely represented as entered by him in the case. · Court records showed that Justice Richman routinely referred to himself as presiding in the case as “judge by assignment”. However, no Assignment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law. · Court records further showed that the Los Angeles Superior Court, a party to the same litigation, routinely referred to Justice James A Richman as a presiding “by reference” in the case. However, no Appointment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law for a Referee. · Plaintiff’s counsel referred to Justice James Richman as “designated” to preside in the case. However, no designation record was ever found in the case, either. The complaint noted that no judgment was ever entered in the case, as required by California Code to make it “effectual for any purpose”. However, “not official” court records, published online by the court, falsely represented judgments by James A Richman in the case - in favor of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles Superior Court and against Plaintiff Sturgeon. Requests, which were forwarded to Justice Richman, to clarify the legal foundation for his authority to preside in the case, were left unanswered. In addition, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke were alleged in the complaint as engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to violate First Amendment rights relative to denial of access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) and other records in the case. The complaint alleged that through such conduct the Clerk and Presiding Judge continue to cover-up the fraudulent nature of the litigation in the case. The case of Sturgeon v LA County held the highest public policy significance, since it pertained to the taking of “not permitted” payments by Los Angeles County judges, which were called by media “bribes”. Therefore, the complaint alleged that through such conduct, the named accused conspired to deprive all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County of the prospect of honest court services, due process, and fair hearings in years to come. Conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles Justice system was described already in 2001 by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, as “conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states…”, and the Blue Ribbon Review Panel recommended already in 2006 external investigation of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Regardless, the April 2010 report, filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations, documented ongoing refusal of senior officers of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law in Los Angles County, California, and to accord equal protection to its 10 million residents. The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010. Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the just

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    178 Ansichten80 Seiten

    09-08-13 Sturgeon V La County (BC351286) at The Los Angeles Superior Court - #14 - DR Zernik's Motions Vol II Part8a p492-641-31

    Hochgeladen von

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    Executive Summary Los Angles, July 15 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against James A Richman – Justice of California Court of Appeal, First District, Charles McCoy – Presiding Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, and others of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and deprivation of rights, relative to their conduct in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286). The complaint alleged that the named accused conspired to conduct pretense litigation in the case of Sturgeon v Los Angeles County, where Justice Richman presided with no authority at all and where judgments were falsely represented as entered by him in the case. · Court records showed that Justice Richman routinely referred to himself as presiding in the case as “judge by assignment”. However, no Assignment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law. · Court records further showed that the Los Angeles Superior Court, a party to the same litigation, routinely referred to Justice James A Richman as a presiding “by reference” in the case. However, no Appointment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law for a Referee. · Plaintiff’s counsel referred to Justice James Richman as “designated” to preside in the case. However, no designation record was ever found in the case, either. The complaint noted that no judgment was ever entered in the case, as required by California Code to make it “effectual for any purpose”. However, “not official” court records, published online by the court, falsely represented judgments by James A Richman in the case - in favor of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles Superior Court and against Plaintiff Sturgeon. Requests, which were forwarded to Justice Richman, to clarify the legal foundation for his authority to preside in the case, were left unanswered. In addition, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke were alleged in the complaint as engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to violate First Amendment rights relative to denial of access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) and other records in the case. The complaint alleged that through such conduct the Clerk and Presiding Judge continue to cover-up the fraudulent nature of the litigation in the case. The case of Sturgeon v LA County held the highest public policy significance, since it pertained to the taking of “not permitted” payments by Los Angeles County judges, which were called by media “bribes”. Therefore, the complaint alleged that through such conduct, the named accused conspired to deprive all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County of the prospect of honest court services, due process, and fair hearings in years to come. Conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles Justice system was described already in 2001 by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, as “conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states…”, and the Blue Ribbon Review Panel recommended already in 2006 external investigation of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Regardless, the April 2010 report, filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations, documented ongoing refusal of senior officers of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law in Los Angles County, California, and to accord equal protection to its 10 million residents. The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010. Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the just

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 80

    /.

    The ReceJVer sha11 be paid his usual hourly billable rate, not to exceed

    2 S475.00. Al1 costs incurred by the Receiver and his attorneys in the performance of their

    ", dUlles, mc]uding, but not 1Jmlted to. their fees. shal1 be paid hom the sale proceeds

    4
    S "\ny and al1 expenses of tile operation of tile Estate are the risk of the
    ') r

    - ! I ReeeJ v ershJp. and not the' personal obi igati on of the Recei \' er.
    (1

    l) The RcccJ\ cr me!) }:-;SUc RecclH:,rship Certi licates In increments of

    S I.! S] 0.000.00 bcming interest at eight percent (8%) per annum for up to $50,000.00 to any

    Y II person or panics A11 funds loaned to the ReCClvcr pursuant to such Receivership

    j0 CeI1Jtlcate(5) shall be deemed 1O be a hen of tlrst pnunty whleh shall be repald pnor to all

    11 other encumbrances and claims, other than costs of administration.

    12
    10. The Recelver and the parties to this case may, at any time, apply to
    13
    this Court for fmiher or other instmctions or orders and for further powers necessary to
    J4
    enable the Receiver to perform the Receiver's duties properly.
    ] 5 II . , .
    l6 Ii 1]. Upon close of escrow, the ReceIver shall hold the net proceeds of the

    17 II sale of the Property and before distributing it to Zemik, deduct from that amount (1) any

    l8 II artomey's fees or costs granted to Samaan by this Court, (2) any damages incidental to the

    1911 decree of specific performance granted to Samaan and (3) the Receiver's fees and expenses

    20 II incurred as described herein.


    2] II 12. The parties, and each of them, on receipt of this Order shall provide
    22
    the Receiver with the tax identification numbers utilized by the PROPERTY. The
    23
    Receiver shall also be entitled to utilize the tax Identification numbers during his operation
    24
    of the receivership estate.
    25
    26 13. The Receiver shaJJ determine upon taking possession of the estate

    27 I whether in the Receiver's Judgment there is sufficient insurance coverage. With respect to

    28 i any insurance coverage, the Receiver shall be named as an additional insured on the

    -4-
    W02-IVEST iIv!Ml'i40049221! [PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTTJ\"G RECEIVER

    593 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p593/679


    policies for the period that the Recen'e[ sha11 be in possession of the estate. Ifsufflclent

    2 insurance coverage does not exist the Receiver shall lmmecl1ateJy notify the parties to this
    ,
    ')
    ]avvsuit anci sha]] havc thirty (30) calendar ciays to procure sufficient a]]-risk and Jiabihty

    4 II insurance (1!1 the estate (including earthquake and flood msurancc) provided, however, that

    ) i' 11th..:: f{ccl';\Cr doc~ not have suffiCJent funds to dc' so. the rZl'Cclver shal1 seek mstructlons

    () II from tll( (Iun \vith regard to \\hcther lllsuranCt shall be obt;m1ed and how it is to be paid

    fOl. If CI1J1'~lstt'n1 with c\.istinE' ],1\\. the Receiver sha11 m'1 bc' responslole for claims ansl11f'

    8 Ii from the lad ofprocuremen1 or inabIlIty to abram msurance


    C)
    ],:t The Recei\Cf shal1 he authonzed to pZI'. ai11egal obligations urthe
    10
    PROPERT)' outstanding and coming due.
    11
    12 l5. Zcmik and his respective agents, employees, representatives and

    J 3 I/anyone aC!JJ1g in concert with them are ordered forthwith to take all steps reasonably

    14 II necessary to enable the Receiver to administer the receivership estate and to exercise

    15 ii management and control over the PROPERTY, including but not limited to:
    16
    (a) Forthwith providing the ReCClVcr with 21]1 keys, books of accounts,
    17
    records, opnJting statements, budgets, rcal estate tax and other bills, notices and all
    IR

    20 (b) Cooperating wlth the Receiver to enable him to sell PROPERTY to

    21 II Samaan.
    '1'1 (
    L"-.

    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    -'S-
    'NO"·V'E5T ,MM'.· c(10 4 9 2 2 J T ! - - - - - - - - [PROPOSED] ORDER APPOTNTfNG RECEIVER

    594 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p594/679


    16. The parties and their respective agents. employees. representatIves

    7 II and anyone acting in concert with them are hereby enjoined and restrained from engaging

    3 rim any action which interferes with or frustrates the Recel\cr's ability to administer the
    411 receivership estate and exercise management and control over the PROPERTY.

    5
    Dated: :,\(1\'em~. 200'
    (;
    (}t9 ~ ~\ I
    • Hon. JohU. Segal
    ?0<2> . Jltt)d2Jt~i.t~mJPERIOR COURT
    8 <

    9
    j()

    II
    12
    13
    J4
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20

    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    261rI
    II
    .:.-1

    28

    VvrCWES~ ',\j\1hIA00492211 i
    -6-
    [PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER

    595 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p595/679


    PROOF OF SERVICE

    2 SJ.AIF OF C~UFORi\JA. C01.JNTY OF LOS ANGELES


    3 :I I am employed in the County of Los-'\ngeles: ] am over the age oieighteen
    vears and not a party to the within entitled action; my business address IS 333 South Hope
    4 II Street, 48th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071-1448.

    ':;:1 On October 26. 2007. I served the fol1owing doeument(s) described as [PROPOSED]
    ORDER APPOIl'"TING DAVID .1. PASTERNAK AS RECEIVER on the 1nlcrested
    6 Ii party(ies) in this action by placing true copies thereof enclo.<;cd in sealed envelopes and/OJ
    packages addressed as follows
    Robert J. ShUIK11J, I~.sq. Joseph ZC1I1lK
    s The Law Department 320 S. Peck Dnve
    ColdwelJ Banker Residential Beverly BIlls, California 90212
    C) Brokerage Company jzl234S(ZL<,:'arthlinknct
    11611 San VJcente Blvd .. Nintl] Floor
    I (l i! Los AnQeles. C:\ 90049-651 (I
    Facsimile: (310) 447-1902
    1J I robcrt.shulkin(a,camoves.com

    BY MAl L: I am "readily familiar" with the finn's practice of collection and


    ]211 0 processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited
    13 v./ith the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fu]]y prepaid at
    Los Angeles, California in the ordmary course of business. I am aware that on
    14 motion of the party served, service is presumed invaljcJ if posta] cancellatJon date or
    postage metCI date is more than one day after date of cieposJt for malling in
    15 affidavit.

    16 0 BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I served such envelupe or package to be


    delivered on the same day to an authonzed courier or driver authorized by the
    17 overnlght servicc carrier to reCC1VC documents, in an envelope or package
    designated by the overnight service carrier.
    18
    ~ BY HAND DELIVERY: I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand to the
    19 office of the addressee(s).

    20 110 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: I caused to be prepared and sent an email to the party
    listed below at the e-mail address shown on the service Jist.
    21
    ~ STATE: J declare under penalty of peTjury under the Jaws of the State of
    22 California that the foregoing is true and correct.

    23 Executed on October 26, 2007, at Los Angeles. California.


    .--) /1 /
    24 "
    ,, :
    , i

    25 1
    \ J.~.
    --------=-:=:--.--/:/~~_'- c ~>< f!~--
    D3-vid Z3sloff
    26
    27

    28

    596 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p596/679


    597 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p597/679
    ..'.~' ~?'2~~~"..Z:, ~ 31
    310 ,,, ,,:."",0, 3 :49flM;
    PtoGE
    PAl;£ 2
    e4

    CAUFORNIA .
    J'"~
    ( -' I. I r II II .. I .\ RESIDENTIAL PURCHASE ~GREEMENT
    ~~~ ,\ .. ~ 0 ( 1.\'\ I (/ .. AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
    ... () r II r. l" I. rOil' .,. Fot U.e WIlf1 SI"91oe 1::un1ly bslclenlUl ~ - Alia,," Of ~
    (C.A,JIll'orm Ml,t,-e.t.. "'""iuct 101021
    ~I.e 1~H....t-r~2~ .; _ A,"uh &;.111 ' c.'~ia.
    1. OF;:E~:
    ,.,. THIS IS A", OfF'Dl FRQI,l _~ __
    ...f~lL:·"'~A""L..JSIl;" 'llJnl.- . rB~)
    e THE Af.AL P1<O~E.l'm' TO e, ACOI.IIl.£D II anent•• ~5 320 S. Peek ~ ..... ~&.1v 8,>,';1., 9 90ZU
    ___ .AS~Ncr,~r(riNC j;ZS .. C;4-C2l ~",

    8(:Y'u;y }4;l( County r:J Loa AAqr19# . ~ ... 1·~I'lJl)e"'f).


    C. 'n1£ PURCH.ASE PRlC~ .~er~c ~ On- J1.ill.1 Q n ,su ~ Srcl:lty :'hoc'AIld
    . __ . .. _ _ _ ~~ $ .c. ......{~7~"..QI<JO""QIo:.o...lQt...O'- _
    D. CLOSE Of f:SCI'lOW Sh.1I OcellI On _. uctQPeZ'.1.5 20"" :o~lItl (or ~ 0;)1" Abl "'~t3""'"')
    :; ~N.""C£ 'r£}l~: Obla<f\'~' l~ Ic.~ below IS a contrnll"'l;)' Of mil ~~.mtm unJQ$l: {I) .~, 2K Dr ~ IS et>_.c t>.aow or III) 0lhIt'-
    89reec In "",non<; Bccyei ~n.1 act dll'9.n11y ana In good faith It; octlin 1M ae~_ed ~ Obla""nc; aeposrl. 0-'1 ~yTTlI!nl'r'ld d~ng lX>StI no aO'
    • conbrlQmc:y. Buy.' repr~ms maj tuftOS WI. ~ good when deQOS"ed..-(/l E,c:row Hold".
    ,.,. INlTlAL OEPOSlT: 9"Yer nas 9"""'~. ,n!l'lC .mount Of. $ 10,OCO.00
    l~ ,..,., ~n: su~m,'n>n. tile O~I (0" It> Q ~ _ \. b y ~ \'SQ"" ctte<:lo
    (or C. _ I ~ P'OlyIO~ to _

    ...hlC'l 1,.,;:1 ~ Mia lInC2~M 11M. Acceptance Ind then Q~o!>Ol.eC1 "'lltIm 3 ll .... . - o~~ aile, ~nca
    10' ::::; _ _ _ ). Wllf\
    Esccw< Mold"" (Qr Q ,nto 8'010," trvst ac;count). $ _
    6- INCREASED OEPO$/1: buyer ,h:>~ oeoosrt ,",'Ul EsC'''''' Holder an ,ncreased deposn II' TIle amQUl"J! of
    w,vlln Dey, Ao:aotal\C&. or 0 AI\~r _
    c nRST LOAN IN TH~ A.MOUNT OF . $ 1.336,000.00
    11) NEW FV~I ;;"'.0 of T"'''I ," hi"'" aI ler>Ctl. enCUrnberrng Iht Property . . . OJnno. nCllill Pclyallle al malOmu<l1
    ,nlel1l~ Of '. 50Q -" l'dOra., Or ;;. QDC '4 ,MIa' aalu'tallie I"lIte WIltla mlXlmum in~tst ta1t
    of ._~$L. 'J.. b.. lan~ dve 11 30 ye~... mortlJtC 30 ow,.. yea~ BU)e' ,110/\
    ~v lo;l n '~s/:lolnIS nOl 10 el~ (Thew leltl'l!l apDly..m.lhor " . deaign. .a IOen
    IS ~,., .. e-nuon:tl F;..tA Or VA ]
    (2) 0 ~HA :=
    VA ,l~ IollOoOling 1etr"6 only apoly lC the HiA or Vf11Oe" tn.t IS ~.)
    Sf~r ~al Day ._ 0/, ""c:aurl1 po,"," Stilt' 51'1811 pay l>!IIar ten net a ~ III be ~od by 8vva r .
    :-, n01 IC e.cee-d : Seller '''ai,
    pay IIIe ~t ~ let\dIIr re~d !Wpaira (Includln;
    'those 10, wOOd ~~ ~ Olhel'WlU prO¥id.cl 'or ,n til II .t.;r.ernent. C not Ie 8lCOHO
    Ci'SD"OY'!>O
    S_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ IAc:II;lllo.n ....-.o..nt ~y orw;;re."
    if mot1g'oe ,n&cur.Ince prerrwrTa, 11/1\01"0
    ' - or c:IOUlg r;n$l!! are Ilnancea )
    O. ADDITIONAL FINA~NG T~RMS: :J ~lJer fmancrlg, Ie "-It I'arm Sf',&.): QlMCXlI'IOatY f",ano"G.
    167,000.00
    (C .... R ~orm >'M c.a,a~fOlof\ 4A) ~ . ... ... . .-

    ~ B'ALA~U~Q\ASI""-let
    (.'01 In ClulSlng ~ oIDDft'M1Q lOaM OIt1O elMr d!Mlnll coI~lll\ tile amount ot S 157 ( OOC. 00
    Ie be ".poS:leC WIt"' ~:>CfOW ~ wiI'Irn .LI1fI~1 brne :0 ~ ncrow
    ~ pultCkASf PI'tICE (TOTALl·. . ,.. . ..S 1,670, 000.00
    G L~N ... ~p.,IC,l.TIONS: Wrt~,n , (or [1 ) O:a,.. Ahr "a:zpUnc:a.!l\l)'C-' Ihall oro-illQ s.l_ra lII11erfr<rn IenClllt 0' rncn~ loan
    or~ ~llllln'i te,al baled en a re-... cr 8Uye(S ""ll1en appiI~ anQ credl ~on. Buytr .. prfOQualitled Of pre8llllrDllell tor !he N~ IOtIn
    ,pec,fled '" 2: .0crJ.
    H \/'ERIFIC,tlTION OF DOWN P,tl'()rllEWT AHO ClOSIHO COSTS: 8.,.".. (Qr eU)'llr'lI lender or lean broke, PU/'lUal'll 10 2G) 'hal~ ~In
    7 lor 0 ) Day. Art.- A~l\Ce. P't>",oe Seller wnrten ve<Jf\utllln 01 Buy8(" clo"'" ~ymen' ano c:ang CCStS
    .,O,tlN COJJl'l'lNGfNC'r' REMOVAl.: (;) WIlI>rn 1T (or C ) Day- Alter A=epl.anoe, lluyer ah.n as epedled in Pelagr;JpI'l 1., _
    ,.,e IOlln :.ol'I,ngwney or cancel r!ll$ Agree""'''l OR
    tunCle(l .
    .tI'
    (if ;;:'eOledj 0 mt loa:: cont".oSle~ slWll "'!ma., in !'ft.cI U'tfit _ c1tmgn..-d ~ are

    .). APMAl$AL COIJ/TtN(;(NCl' .,., R£IfOVAL, Tn. Ag..... ",.,,1 i'S (0,,- "cn-d<:e<l, 0 e NOT) oonttrl\lMlt ~n ttoe Propetty 'Pf!'Me'4l at ftC
    Ie" Ih.n "'•• oeC1~ed purchak PI\CW. If 11\0,. IS .. 1oAf1 con'''Olrq, Ill'" \ltTle 1he Ie." CO/I""glnr;y" ""IClved (or, ItctlllCMd. (XI WI!ItIlI 17 lor
    :-1_.- ) D~, AM' Acup'.nQl). Buyer shU, liS SPKlDel:l in paragraprl '4813~ ... ~ rNl app .. ..-l amk~ncy Qi' ear,eel U.II Agre..-nl.
    If ~"e .. no '0.1\ """'"'98nl:)'. B~r .~.Ill ~ lIpeClNCl In pa.'-sl1lph '48(3). re"""'l ltw .OP......I ce"gnl1enc:y witnr" 11 (Dr ) O¥
    A~ AC:Cl!Pt;ln~
    I( C /11O LOA'" COlfTINGEN(;Y [If ~ ) OCU""n9 .n~ 101" rl p'r.;rapn, :zC, 2Il Dr else"l'tlere "., this~ ... It NOT • ccmrnpency ~ tn.
    "'grnment If 8uyer oces nc'I Cilia" the Qn and as • ,...u~ eu,r.r clOes ncl PU,cnlM IIIe Prooeny, seller may bII ~ te Buye<. OtOOl~ or
    other leg.1 r.l""ol!o~
    L. [].Au. CASHOFF~ (If erle-cudl: No IoIIn .. ~ l1;) pUICIllt\e me ~tlY. Buyorr and Wlltlin 7 40t' 0
    o.y, A~' ,,~, )
    pro_ICe Se~r wlI,.n vellrll2bon 01 ~~ I\, no 1 tn close til•• tral\UC/JOn
    3 CLOSItolG HO OCCU..... "'CY;
    A. B..,..r ' nos ,or c: dOCS not '~ne) III occ.uP)lI~ F'1!>perty a. Bu~,., ptll'ft2ty ",elell.,c:a.
    B S.",,-ocevpWd 0' ,,~unt p<o .... rty: OCGl4lanc:y ,nail be "ell"lnod Ilo 8lIy.r ~ 10 tz AM ~. 0 0
    on !lie all. 01 Oow Of ~K""",;
    [j on ,Q'C) ~ Iller l.">.n _ 0.".
    All... CI~ 01 E.crow. iC.A~.'Dml P ~ 2 . )d~."alerof_.roet
    oc~n~ 00 nol ~cc.ur al !he ,...". lime. e.ry.e r :arid S.IIe, ... .cl"'MO to. (II ....lIlr inlD • ~n oa::upancy
    tfl3ur;anoe ano lege, aovlS-O<1
    ...." :'P"""Iil .. l~''' .... i.JfWI'J.' ~1;~:1 :, , .. I' 'J S ~,~ V"e ......~IUIO
    f1: .... ..,..c'l"',., of ...... 10:11"'" ~ .,.. "ttoOr' ~,. 1)1 ~001 ~' ... c:r a"'t "',...
    Bu~rs In"18m (
    •
    SeJier, Inlt.~ ( )(
    (
    ud (il) c:ronsult WI4Il ntllI'
    I
    J
    _
    __
    G)
    ,..".~,.,.,. ~ l.X.J"".t: t.Y ;:,..."'~ lo"'"tIU C:col'hC"" r ':~1-2no: j J
    :. ... ll'lJII'''~ A!Q;.OC"-''':J()-'lI or t'l:5,AL r=A.M.' Nt:" -,l ~G).f~ ",.~~O. R: .. ~~ by CbII =~

    '''A.c.& "£VISED 1010. (PAGE' OF 8) c.c.lIFOR~ R~IDEp.(fJAl E'UflC~S£ AG~fVl'~T IRPIo.CAPACiE 1 ~_e

    Ape11t: Nlvle Samaan Phone: 43'l O~n1135 ~a:Il: r.J101 p~ usll'lg WlN"~ sofIw8..
    a'c•• r: (;011."," 1. Gnffi" RUIII)~ lJ33 WKt>oeod 8.\,,,. Lea "'nQW~ C,tl 9002'

    598 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p598/679


    __'. ~/32/2~~~_.J "5~"
    ~peny "'«I'KS. ~"a. r'aM ::.ru e
    .3l
    ilt!'9.rly n-··.
    "om ..
    G1\ xUU
    ~~." ~;~OPIA;

    Clale .hPu-tw r ""


    PA(%:
    PAGE 3

    21l{}4
    85

    C. T.~"'-<>C(;\.IP'.a~· (i) ~ ~II De ~~ allea615 (or C _ ) D~I PMorIO CioN OIbcrow. urtes:lCllPle'Mae ~
    '" .,,,,n; II60U to 'all...: "you ." uNlIlIe to c»l",... ~pe1'ty vacant In accoraatlco \IlIIItI NoftI ~ allCl othe-f arpikabN LM. 0\1 may
    be ,n b<.ech of lhiI AgrMmftlt Y
    OR Iii} Ii! eheCl<ed;
    p"l~n3:·
    = T..-n 10 ,~ irl ~.'!!lJOf\. T~ atlaenao loc..n<lWfl ~ I"'''''rt>~ IIllO tn. A(>-ment (C...... R Form F>........

    OR (iiil (If O>eexeeJ G TillS AgrNflocnt 11 corlti"tOCrrt UDo, El\;~r aN:! ~Illr pnleriog ..,10 • wr1lll'" l~menI "'9I'0nsl OCCUl>lllCf of tile Pro~
    ...~n,n :nt lime spec~1eC ;r, N'.9'."~· :4BO~. Ii no ""ntten .~eoemol'lill reae;,-o _ trlll ~~. ~ eul"l' 60 Q.i.., _ , ;onl;»lll... .:.;.....-.;:JI.
    In WI'lll19
    D. I'\l Cl::"e ~ EscrOlN Salle< lIu'9 ns Ie B..... , any ..519nlll)!t .....,..nly '"'JI1:s fly nems I/'leJlJCI&d ,n _ ".., W>(j wi P(l;>vtdl ¥1y I~e Cop_
    01 suen ...... rT~n(lr. B,o.e~ cannO! ano Will net tIl! ..m"ne ltIe ass'OnaOiITY 011ny ",ananlleS
    ~. "I CIoW Of E~cr')w. un~. ot'".,rw,•• ~r.1O '" -111"9. SQllr' ,han prolf'CSt "ey\ anOJor _ ...IS to cpara.. ~I iOO<s. "'MbOttl seOJl'lly 1)"11e""

    aiarms anO 9"'"9" 00Q0' op.~ N ","operty 15 I conOM1lnoum or klcar.<l In I common ,n.. ~ 'UbO""~IQ" B~ mlY De reQUnc 10 ~ ~
    oep~' Ie Tf'1. "'o~O"'ners Auce.. ~on rHOA"
    to ~in "')'$ ~ ;I~lOle HOA tacjf~
    ... AUOC'I TION OF COSTS (If c~..,..eo): u~ten Olfltr-.-OW l~oeQ here IhiI oaragralln only ~.-.rnl~.no is 10 ~y~, Ike ,ape I\. ,napection. tMI'
    or .. rvlOP _nhO~ If nOI Sllfcrl_d ~ Or .ls.... hrr? m ~ !',greemem. In. ao ..rm,natJon aI who It W pey tor any wort -=orrro'ri_ '" .oe1"lll1le<l
    by any lUr;t> repon on'~dJCfl I~I or ~"'~ "'"II be Dy ttle metl\Oll_cif_ on ~"",raph ,4Bioll
    A. 'NOOO DESTROYIIlIC ~ST I~~PECTI~:
    11) C' Buyer IJ s.... r ~h •• p~ for ,n ,,,.. PPQion .rod ~pOr: tor WOOO cjgSlICY'f\9 ~11 I~ 0'Y'nosons ~pon; ""'1C!1 el'lail be I"'IOI~
    Dy _ _ _ . .• ~ O'UaUDI pe~

    CDmrol compaM) The R,ePOn ShlU COWr the '~Illie a~aJ ~ ~


    me'" bYadll!i and ~ SlT\I=UIM encl. if
    ChecJ<~ U ~t.c;hed 9"aoft Intl C¥PO~. 0 oelached dlCkS. 0 tha 101owo1lg _ 1Irue&u_ or .... 111
    - - _ . - - - -- . The IUport lhA~
    '"101 ,nCluoe roel CDn'lIng! "~'OP"rl)' 1$ a eonoorrm,l.l"l\ or ~ In • QOtlTTTlOn '_.w
    ~" ion t:le ~ .raI IIlClUllI OIllY ~ ..
    ~P""tl ,,,,orps; onC .ny Q.CJU"".·uN "''''.~ ~,"II .,anmrred aM ~h'lI "ot 'nauoa a>tT'VTlOn " ...,. un.... otrte-rwlW "'9.-<1 Wete< r~ cI
    .. ~ower pans ", uooer Ie".
    I un,l!""'y nOI ~ pertormeo wltho"' con8lCf\l Of the OWf\Q,.. Of proal"'" Delooo< !I'ot " ' - r
    01'\ ~2) ~ rtf cr>ee""', T~I at;.et\eo "00""0= (C '" P.. 'orm ~") r~ln:long *000 lHAr(l\"1'lll _ I ''''_O,on aflCl llloQbC" .,/ cost Is .na>fl>ora1llCl

    ,nro 11'10 Aore-ment
    ii. OTH!!" INSPECTIONS J. ND REPORTS
    111 0
    8u~r c::i Se~f .na~1 PWy to hlW sept,,; or ~....w ~'llit lkSpasal SySM'TII ~cIad _
    12) L:' Iluye' 2 Sell~' $~.II pay Ie ~,ve domestIC well!. 1astld fer _~r POlIIll.ny 8nd prllOualVily ~_-_ _-
    13) L: BuY.' ~
    S~I~r ,hal cw>y ttl';I n:llur:ll ~~artl.zOfM oi&<:.\o,.ure ,~" vreP8"'d by ..$!..!.!.llt.l
    ....lI£,.J!'~ei!.h!J9z,."'·C81i!! . --
    14) : : 8uyf'r 0
    Soli" snail pay 10' thr to'lOw~ ~ec:llon 0' _ I I
    (5) 0
    6uywr :: ~e'" s"~11 PlY tor lhe 1011ow~ ,r>sptalon or 'II'Ort - _ _- -
    c. GOV£R~Men "EOUIF'lEMf:NT5 AND ~ROFIT:
    (1] [j Buyer ~ ~Iler ,nail pay 'lo, .m..... ~ataeto, ,nsulllbor1 M\dIOT waftr l\eatlr bracng. Ii "ou.., DV ~. ~, Ie Clole Of Et:.tow. Seller
    ~w provrOe Buy.' a W!'~n .ra .. rnenl or conIpl.noe '" ac:eoroance willi _ _ and IccaI Law lJl'\leu fJlten"Clt

    (2) C'
    euyer Gl: Selle' V\ill ,,~ The ce'l ~ CO""p1,ancr wttI'I any othe' """'""'''' tnlncll10ty goval'TYTl8nl retrllIh Slancl.ard•• ..-aiol\& .no
    ",ports ~ feQlJ".o as ~ cond~lon at dOSrrlQ eilO'OW unO&! .ny a..-.
    o. e:SC~ .a. NO nTLE: .
    (1) [XI ~u~' ~ Sillier ,nail PlY ,,:ocrow iN ~J."'/~2
    .......b'"-lllll)yar'!!!!~.rt.!:ll)iIldL..<1.../'_"L.......
    :tlol..ll!&r!!£ _
    E~cl""" ,.,OI<l.r ;nlll ~ ~ d fi q. Egro!'
    12) :=J Bu~r (g ~".r '''aU p~y fer 0.....,.. rIlle ·n~rancr pollc;y ,pecdi~ on pa,.,gntpn 12 Ow k*f Ti t.l. C!?!¥:Ipy!!'oIDY CeJADow
    o...ner , ~,rlt: pOlICy Ie 0. _.,." by --
    (&Uy8r .1'11111 rlay fe' any tIlle ",~u'ance POIC( insurrng iluyer:ll~ncs.r. un.... ottlerw_ agree<! r. ....illng.)
    E. OTHr:R COSTS,
    {1) [j BUyi'r IZ S.lIe, Sha' pay County I .. ~ r l:lx or mlns~r IH _
    (2l :=J Bu"..' (X s.n., ,~~ p~y City lIan,f., Q. Of trilnslllrlK
    _
    (3) 0 Bl.-YC' C seller snll" o:Jy HOA l,anRr ~ ----
    14) 0 ~I.Yfr j. s".... ~all pay HOA ~ n \ Pf1JllIr.tlQn lee. ~ - --- ~

    I!I) C. Buye' III s..., slIail pay tile :cst nor to uCHd S 350 QR. . of I on~r-" hom. _rnIt!ty pl;n.
    ,,..ued by O n t .Am.cdc:;a; €pM liyomty/Dor::t Qz..-p
    w~~ rn" /ollQwln9 01l~0n.;1 eo""'1l/8
    (6) Q il"yel 0 Slll~' ~1\lIJ1 pay /or ~ .• -----

    (7/ CJ
    B-Jyi" S.liIor ~I pn for -=-..,--::---=-----::---:-::-
    0 ::-:=-=-=-:-:=-==7"":'"=~~=_:_:":::.":=_=::_::=:"----.
    S. STATUTORY DISCLOSURfS /lHCLUOING L!.AtHIA5a> P/O.'HT~..c OISCLOSU"fS) AND CA~TlOI'f~'TS:. .
    /0.. (1) S.lIer ,~aJl _111m the ~_ ap"~ in par;tgnaph 1....... delw, W Buy.r. if '''Qund Oy u.. (I) ' _ r . LI"'..e-.d Plm! OiSClO&ures .,.,
    p~mp_ ("LA'" ~V'O'_.'). Ir'Id IIi) Ol5dcsu... ()( ~O'lcas ,eQlJlfee by ~O"S "02 et. WQ. anll , 103 til Mq. 01 tile C.urvmoa CMI COde
    r S~lllrory o-"C~_l Stawtory O""CI06~s ,nClua~ but _ not 'milt(! 10. a Rrll U\3llf lranst.. r DslClosunr SI.tement rTOS°), N8lUtW
    Hlllrc D1Kl~'e SUnemem rN~D"). nol,e. or aClu;o1 1<rI_1adge 01 rrlen" of 1&ell~1 con~ aubaatnca. notlce 01 c:poc:iaI &alt et'\dIOI
    ",,~U""nI' 10' If .lloweO. ""OIll1tlNlly eQu",a~nt notic. ra~rd"'" tne Mello-Aoos Corn~ Facifl",a Aa and ~_nt 80tlCl ACI at
    , 9'51 ~nd r/ Seller ~a, a::tual 'nowlrclgP. In mcUslrial un aM m't!ary ortlrrarlOa IocatlO'l o~ur. (CAR. Form SSC).
    (2) &iyer sha~ ...ifn., T'" "rTW soecrhed 'n ~'1I9raph 1-411(1) ~tur" Sigone<l COl'les o.
    t/'lf Sl.Mory anCl LNd PiadaovrM to sel~
    (3. In Irw avent Sill., pnor Ic C/o.. 01 ;;scraw. beCT:l~' ;I.... ;,1It of . 0 _ c;ondrtio~ """"naUy .... ~Ing ltIe Pt~. or any ....lInal
    '""ccuraey ,n Ol:'.r;Jo~ure~ In'ormaf.on Of '~a~ntalonns ~'i1Ou,Jy proo.rrotod 10 Suye' cA ...hictI 1Xl~ • olt>crw.,.. unawlre. Sellef SI'IalI
    ,'.-, '"~ •• '"'u,_ " 'h~" ,,__ .' ""~ '0 _ ... _~"' __ . ~ _ _ M
    thlelolU", st>aoll not De . . Qul....c 'or o:o"~ltlen5 .nd _ "..I ,nac:cutXI8' (J~I~ itt ~tt8 onle d paid fOr lIS' &UV-.
    __

    Buyers l"~l"! ( { __ } ~
    S.IIer'S In,aall ( )( ) ~
    Co"""nnlr.5;1·:0CZCALlrO~NI .. Al;SOO/O.TION~I'l£AlTOI\M''''C I : I 1_ _
    RltA.C.a. REV1S~D 10/02 (PAGE 2 O~ 81 ~_o to, I:laIt .........
    CAL/~ORNIA RESlOEl'fTlAl PURCHJo.SE AGREEMENT (R"A-cA ".a.Gf 2 0' 81 IC>2ll9131l.zJ"'X

    599 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p599/679


    ._lB!22/2~~_~ __~~'~ 31
    ' " 27' •• ~ • . O< J::llPM;
    PAGE: 86
    PAGE 4/1~

    Pf~E:rry.,l~ren: ~ Ped Dr! U !I.Zu.ly !I11;~ C<\ 9C21...2 0..: .$«pc""". iDD,j

    14) If any c~~~ or nllC.Cl ~ 'n ~1i ~ wbM~1't or ~ O..clOS~ or MOllOt • oewered II) Bu)o9r.,..:ne oIIe< II &goIed.
    00 .... ' If\4lJI I\I~ tr.& "9/11 W OncellnlS A9~ .,ttl,n 3 D;oya ~ oell've'Y In ~cn. or I D.ys ",.. ~ .... ry ~ clepOSl ,,~ mai. t:>oI
    9'Y'''9 w'IDen Tlll1lCA 01 unq,lYUCn Ie S«Aef or Seo!lers ~nt (Le8d D~cl<»~_ .t-Ill by ma;I m<JSl be Ioe1'11 c:wtiIeo mag 0' ~r,)
    I~I NotR te Buye' anc :!>el"'-; "",.t>oef of ~ry _ l.eao Oia~u~ is lWohibiteo by ~.
    ~ """T1.J,,-,L .HC ENVIIIlQlo.l"ENTAL HALlI'tDS: Wl!:Tl,n til. trTW 5Oecofled In o;II~J"a~ '4, ~I Wlcll. r requIred by l.M>o: IiI _~ 10 Bc~
    t4<tI"Qu... gulOtl c.no oU~lQnna.rc) .nd e"",:-onmo~ rIa2JIrd, boOkIel: Iii ~"n<npt t'Dm Tile Obligation to P<"OVlOe 8 "'HD. ~ ilTIle
    P.,peny IS IOCiI~~ '" ~ SOtC.1I FIoQQ HUOlO'tl A,.. : F'olenllal "'lOOcling ~"")ndl't'o~' f-ru Vttry "'~~ .... l-iazal'l. Zen:: State ~'''' l\e&c>o~~'
    A'Ia: E.rthcua~. F'ull Zan. Se-.s'l'lOC Hni"" Zonll: alWl lii1 O=,(jy .ny ornllr lOne. 't<:Ulfe::l oy Lao .... 0 prtW_ '''\' C:1I'lef ",Iormatlon
    'NU.~ I'" !I'IO" zone"
    C. 0,1,1,1, BASE DISCLOSURE "IClilC~ Thr, Clllllorrll~ DePMtnent 01 Ju,~c«, ,~"Ih <Ie~1'lmtrl[5, ~ict orrpertme'lltJ ~"9 ""-1CbO~ 0'
    2'lO.DOO cr morf ono "';nv Olll.., ICc.a, ~ .. et1lor~enl autl\ori ... mam&ln Itt, ptJbloc a~s ;a Oat, base oIlhl IoC::OIlJOfU 0' ~ rrr<llU"etlIC
    "'9;sw I pu~u"n, If' n"'9ropn I1 I 01 "..cc>'1SOCn ,.. ) of SectJOn .SO 4 01 tI\e p...,., c.oo.. ThQ ().>T:l b. . . 'I ~ on " Qua~rty t g _ ano ;a
    'OU"Ce 0' rntonnebO~ ;apCul :'" prf'M"Uo d ~a I~al, II'> Iny " ... hbomood. rM ~nl 01 JustlCll 1/1() rr,al1raru I ~ ~~
    Io.ntrl ~l1On l..f'e Throuo~ .. hlen ",~" .._ .. bout rncl'_IOYall """y ba mad. 1hle oS a "900' lPlepII"". ~""'>QI. Calters mull ",~ _el"
    "'Itt'INIUO~
    "DOv\,nd"'ICIu.lS Vllt)'." 0"ee .... 9 In1ormelJon "'9;lfClillQ neiQl>t>orTIOO(ls. not .,,;h.oble II'rOUOh lTle -900" teIeC",~ &41".,.,.
    CONDOMINIU~"/'tEDlJNIT Drv!l..OPMEHT D~OSURI:!l:
    A. Sll.1..£R HAS: , to, L' ) Days Aftt< Ac.c»pmn~ to O'eelO•• to !uv-r ,,-.tne, tt>e "ropefly " <I conocmln,cm 0' IS loC*eC ,., •
    ;:O"n.o ,,"'; ll.Y.IO_' or otI'>er c.ommon 'llIWesr W!Xlnr..,gn (CA 1'\. Form SSOl
    6. I' me ProPfI'lY 'I " conoom.,'wm CI " ~lra ,n I p.. nne~ unn ete"'lopmeni Ot 01l>er com"...,n in~ l..t>o",.ion. St ... , ".S 3 (or I 0
    [nys A~' Ac:a.cunca to leQUPSl horn ~ HQ.I.. rC.AF< Form H(),l.) (I) COPet 01 .ny Oocu..-.nt:l requno by l-: IH) d~cmJ'" 01 any pendlng
    or ;a"'olp;llaC e:t;urrl 0' l\lg.tr.>r1 by 0' a9U1" !he H().I.: (lill a ~~nl c.onl.min~ lhe Ioeetlon It'd """1tler Of ~ pal"o'"!l .. no ~
    "'.~. ('v) Cop",~ 01 h mc5t l1lee," 12 monrtlS of "lOA mtf'\U!eS Itlr "'gulI' ano sro.c>a' ~Url95' lind ,"'I ttw Mnwa aM CC1T\.IC omo.-tion 01
    .11 HOA.! 90vemng t!'~ Pro~rty Ico-,Oro1ty 'CI Olsc:JMU'U, S.I~, sflal ItemIZe and Ot."., Ie Buye' 111 CI DwoslMls ~NeCl trDm lht HClro'
    <lM any (;1 D,sdll,uru 'I) ~I~. ~S~IOti ~LJyc" ~pp"",el 01 CI Dl$Closv'oc IS; eo"""1l.ncy of lTl .. Ag~nt a, s.psc:iMo '" ~I~p~ 14
    , CONOIllO"S AF'-ECTIIIG "~F'E,n,':
    •. U~S c:me ..... 'u aQ"''' (I) It>c Proper1¥ 's ~d /.. ) ." lis PR~SEh'T pnyslcal condltl..., .. of Uls _ 01 A~.,. and It>! subted tel
    8~s InvWSbgonJon '19~: (ii) I~P Prq:w!b'. ",cluO"'ll pool. "'.I, l.no:>c;.all'nQ Inc ",oune,. is Ie be ",,"~I'- ,n S<JD51anbalty It-. ~
    COnOl1Jon U "" tnc COlt 0' Acc.aplillnOO: ano (iii. ~~ "sbrls snc:l perscnel P'CDerty not induCleO in t~. sail .nal be /'t'fl"O>reQ by CIoee 01 ~
    S SEll!!'R SHAL.l, wltl'l,n tne II"'C speeifit.d 'n .... '1I"noph '''''', DISCL06£ I'(NOWN MA T'EAl.AL. .. ACTS AIIID DI!FECTr. ~ trOt
    Pmpel1)'. ""cludlng kno_ ,nSu,.n.,. ~.,~ Wllflm Itt. PUI 'lI,rr 1M", .... NO MAI(f OTPiIR DISCl..OSURE.$ ~QtJVlED IiY LAW lc..A..A
    F<>ml SSO)
    C. IIIOTI!' 'TO 8UYER. YCf<j .... s ~ ICvbPd tel conduct 1"".5tlpatio.... 01 Ifl• •ntioa ~ Ir1 0 ..... to _m,n. Its ~ _ conaticn
    .,nc:~ !>+1M' ",ay nOi II« ~ . . <>f ~ ew'e-cu att.cnng tt>s 'ropeny or ett>er tacto.. thai you CO _ _' l"'POrtan,. " ' - ' t y tm..".,.....m
    ~J nol be buill liC:COrd,ng to coOe, in e<>mplianc:. wiltl ~nI Law. or _ "eel
    perm... Ias.-d.-
    D. trlOT~ TO SE.Ll.ER· SU)'''- ~ the "girt to Inspect _ Pmp«ny .JUI, as ~p6df..o in ~Qrap/\ ,.a.
    bHed uoonln1t>rrtWflen disc:~ In
    IhoM In.~OF\S; (i) c:.nG.' th,. ,1.9'_: cor ~;i) ~u . .1 that you maY Repooi" 0' c.IJ.. ~n. 0'1"'"
    !. HEMS INClUOf:O MilD !XClUDED:
    .. NOn TO euym ANC SEl..L~ t~ Ilstl!'O at I1"\Cluded Dr uct~Qed In It>e MLS ~rs or '''''~'19 mMe/lllJe are not I ~ ,n hi. p"rctllM
    llnc:. 0' e~ClUCIeCl1Tom In« Ule U "tess 1l'.c1lell ,n IlFl or C.
    S I~MS INQUCEC IN SAl[
    (1: Ali EXISTING fllnuI.~ ar\CIl'lUflQll m.r.11I ans~ te It>a Prc~,
    (2) [;.rsl\~ eNtcl'1ClI1 rnpOI''''c.11 .ghbng. plumlllrlQ llId .... Z1l1lg fixtures. <:.rIling r.M. I,rtpl<l~ Inw~. gal Io~ .1Id ~. sel., s".terns
    bull... n oppL."Cts. ""oco'" .ne ooor "''"nt!.
    aWT1,n~s shut2r". ",;"oow CC"f"ngl, atule:tJed noel c:~"'g5. IIo""",SIOM .~n".s s.otr~
    o.. hes ll"~te lnte9ra~c Iltleonone ~~1!'lS • ., OOOle~o:>nC"lIonrrrs. POClV~p...QU,pm.oc ga,ave 0001' oll9 .......I'..,.,'''. Q>fltrola, rn.ibo>
    ,no(l/t)unc:ll~nOoc;IPIM§;.[r~.s~t1ruba. __ , ~lIt-ners. W<ller ptnf\an;. l.cur1\' SVl1t.,,~a13rme: lind
    (3) T~ 11:l11DW"'9""~ _. -- _

    Sell.; rcp'.... nIS rh:l: "" ,1~mI 'nQua.cI '" _ ~nl"" pnc.t. un...". O~_ .~f...,
    IA) .•~ ~ by Sella,
    .1 ".~ ,ncAJOaO l"aU DlI1rann.,,.0,,.. 01 hens.nd WlthOU!
    (~) warnr'rty. s....,
    C. ITEMS £XClUOHl FROIlI SoAL!: _

    i. !lNER'S ""vESnGATIOH OF Pl'lOPERTY.-NO MATT~ AFp:f.CTIHG PROPEI'TY:


    A. Buyf"" ao;.oopr.snoe 01 l'11 ~nlCll'\ of tnll .ny oltler ~r .ofltding Itoe Pro~. IS a ccnr"'geney of thIS "S'-rnet11 as specified III Ihll
    ~.agr~n and llara~"pt1 148, Wot?I", .,... t.... ~.ClfMd lI'l ll .. ragraoll 14e(1). euy.' 'hall rifle the tighT. 3T evyers UPtMSrt unlesS 011'1._
    ~"'~, Ie r",,'lOud "_CUont "'Ye"9.""n5, 111_. S..,.".,... .no ot~.' "Iud_ CElul"" Inves~g.lJonl·), ,neJuOitig. tut nollllntlelllD. h ngN lD: .1)
    ,"speO 101 leaC-N~ PlI'1'll 1110 otns, Iea<l~ ~nt "'erorc~. III) inlPec1 10, wood OUlroy,ng peats and orgaMrsrn&: liiil ~_ ~ l'tIgiu,«f
    s~. ~nCl<:r ~I"'OM. fW) C1)"'rrm _ 'MUlllbdily of S.".., a"" ~ P,opany, .n" Ivl latlSIy e""..- al ID any
    Buren enspecuor /Io,Ovlsor, (eA FI Form 814). W1tnoul Sal~' Il"or wnttsn conscnL 8Ilyer "'~II r>e1l1\., _
    rNI_
    ~pcctflt'C ttl I'" -ttec;l\eCl
    nOf t:au_ 10 be m.de: iiI aw......
    <If O.SI""ct"'~ Buy., In~I'9.obon.: 01 (il) "'SPCe:tfOr$ by ~ny ;o¥'f,nmental bUlldlns or <on,ng ,~'" 01 goo..emmtnl emplOyee, lII'lIen reqwiJeCl

    byL.aw
    I!. Buyrrr 'hall c:0"'~1c Ouye' 1"•• 51igII1OI"S 1Il'lCl. sa _oileel ,n pa,~",p/) , ..S ... ",o.s In. Q;mri"S.nc;y or ca~1 U. Ag,eement. 8"Y'"' s",.h g-
    5.~er 011"0 ensl C:OI':"~1C1e COPItS 01 .11 BU)'e1 In''8SllOat!on reports OCta,n.c by Eluyer sell8/' ;"'.~ flI.k. IN Pteoerty aW-lIble lor all 8uyH
    In.... ST'!'I"h<>nS S.ior ~nlU r,ave waTa.. ~aa .~an<:IY IInd,1 OPfllllblC l»1C' """t~ on lor euyers Invs&1ly"lio", anO lh<ougll lI'Ie elate por.ae-ssrCln III
    made I\,fDII:3lCJe tC' e~. . yer ~

    Bu~~ lnotels (
    Sder! '''''131, ( .
    1
    1(
    • -. )
    I
    (5)
    =
    r.""Y"9'lt '" 'Q"'·~OO~ Loll.", 01''''.... Assoc';.nON O' nr". TOFi.S6; INC I :-_
    RPJIo.C. RE\.1SED 100102 /PAGE 3 0' II R . . - bl' C.t. I ~•..,_,
    CALIFOI:lNIA ~E.SroEIflI'-l PU~CHASE "'GflEEMEI'fT (I'lP... ·C... 'AGE 3 0 .. I) HJltt,l,lJO.,:r:\

    600 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p600/679


    10/22/2004 15:4.~• 31 MAR~~ PAG: 87
    .:J:::'" 01; L,;ULL)t'~LL
    ~1C 271 4634; ~~2-04 3:52~U; PAGE 5"5

    Prcp~nyA~ 'iZC,i ~ Dun .... uJLIU.l.;, r"" I1QZl: D.1c; ..ilI:.rl r amt>,e. ~
    10. R£PAIRS: ~l''''' mall De r.lO""Pl"tCl proCH 10 finOlI -.ermanLDn of a>neitlon unlU. ~ .gt-e r, """tlrl\i' ~I'" III bQ ~m.o at Srllera
    ~xpe,.,. ~ ~ pertom'leO by r.. .... er:tYoo..9h 0\l'I.~. ~1lle(l1n., It. wo'"
    c.omc~....t!'I apPilQble u-o. ,ndUclng oa-"..,.,.nt.t Ile'"1I\, in~,'
    .no .~v.' requue~ms ~I~ ~a~ c.. ~rmec In a good. ~I ,.".nAcf .... n "lll'1e ...11 01 qu,llty 'n<lIlP~_ ~ ~ lC eY>SUng
    m2ft~1o II ~ cono&mocc It\al .,.aCt 19C'.crallC<1 01 :lP~r;a~ or CC'Smetlc Items 10110"","9 ,I R4Icaors ~ no: ~ ~~Itlil. Seller sI\aIl; U\ 001"
    rccelPb to< Fo-~Irs p."ermed by Olr>e~. (ill ple~" • wm:.en It:ltf'I'NnllnOICaII"S tr.. Re~1T'S """O~cl by Seiler and the elate of 1.l,;(tI Repa": &"lll
    ~i>l) pt'Ovllle CoPIU er ~lPts ane I~'.menl' 10 Buyer p:l()1 10 ~nal vcrW1CObon. f1f CXl"\OI1l01\.
    l' euyo IND~ITY AN:) !>!'I..LE~ F'ROT£C:l101'l FOI'l EWTRY UI'O/II PJIlOf'!'l'TY: Duyer .hll: (il kMP ~ Property ~ ..-.c <JeI, of ~II$ (ii)
    ri.ou 1: 1 c;r:\oIlie an,IOS lro.,.., Buyel Inve~I\lIlbOn' IIl(l (Iii) lflOennMy a"" hold S..er na~Si ~m aM "esu~ l.ac~,. CllI~. ~. llll~
    .. no eootl. ehJyer ~al :.arry 0' Buy., 'hili reQUIre "onyolle ;ICinQ on eUytr' ~h"" 10 ~Il'). \ltle.., o! I~, WOIlo-"rs' COF'I'108ns-.o" ano:: Ohl
    "OP,c:able ,".ur_~ oe-'no,"O 1M prOlfe'llng ~I'-r IroM ullQi~ for Iny "'JUfles lD Pcr~~ c:r proP'filI Ottu'''''9 0-JI1f19 any Bu~f Invll$tlgluons 0-
    wO'" oone on l"e "roperrylr eu~(~ 0'11:01On pnUI \Q C~ 01 Escrow S~~. IS :>Olltwo!l'lal crrtaln P"t'~r.tJ(lnl""" bt ~ s......
    try /9CDr'd,,'5 I
    "NO!l~ 01 IoOon-ruponSiboirty' (e A R. FOnT. NNR) to. iuye< In>'PStl9n~ Inc "'0111 acme 0t'I ~ ProPer!)' al 8~, 0"'8010"1 eu~(s Obi'9"~cn,
    uf1Qer rh~ P~'i19f'WC'1'1 S~ll lU··''''''. I1'Wl krmt,....non 01",1$ A9rwen'M'f'\l
    12. TrTU: .....D vaS,""G
    A Wltt.lll l\f tJ~ 'DeCl~ .r. " .. ragraPo" 1. &~yar 5haU ~ ptt;YIll.o I ClJ~rTl ore""'na,>, (tille) r.port whlC'!'J IS 0I'IIl' a" cHe, to) 1t>e ~ '--," Ie
    '~,u~ e oollC)o of mit ,"suranct ,I""
    may no1 cont.ain ~ Itenn .~Ing tl11e &..yen rrv>eolI 01 tria prQllmonary reoort 8"l: any 0lIIe1 ~u.rs """Id\
    ~ a~c: ~:I<: ~,~ a """t"'gene, O'f :n" ~reemtru at ,~= In pa:agt;lptl 1.e.
    e. 7rtJt 01 \aler> u\ ~s ~"'n1 C<Yl<ln,on "'-'''feCI lG III .nc:vmorancao, -..mtnlS <:ovenant•. condtlClf>O, 'eAIncnon,. "9NI 1'>0 Ol"'" mallers w"":l\~r
    Cl ~CD'" or not. OiS C'/!he Oil. at Ac~nCl peep< (I} mon~t;iry ••", 01 neccm: vn~1 fllJy9r 15 U&umng _ obllQilllMS 0' LaOoing the ~
    sut>jeCI1C lMw 0019al'on. tno (Ii} ,nOK ~ o whicl1 wiler 1\11, 019_0 Ie,..",.,.,. In wn1>nl;.
    c. >'11th.., trI. lune weerile>d on pa~raph '.10 S.IN, nu I OUf)' to Ol$CJCu ~ Buy."" malle" known to Selle< ~1'1Q 11IIt. ~, 01 ~ Of aOl
    0. "', C105oe 01 E"row f1u~r sr..ll recr,vf • ~rtn1 Of'eC GOnlleYll\O I'lle fe-. lot Stoel< COODeI'll_ 0' IOng-¥t'l'l ".M an a»l(lnmrnl of ~
    ;;e rrl1\ca1" 0' c r Seier 5 lUl~/lOlCl IntefH.!). ,,,e:w,ng eil mn~1 anc ",aler r'9'~ U eurrenlly 0Wn~ by s.lIer. nile !n8W ~~I :l' C1e"Of\ale<l on
    8u~. ",,~pltmt'lal ucro.. In"II'\JCTlO~ n;E MA/'JNER DF" TAI<JNG TllL~ MA" ~VE SiGH1FIC.AHT U!G*.l ANC-TJo.X CONS~~NCE~
    COIISUL T 1<... APPROPRIATE PRO~E&SJOfitAL
    E tkJ~r .nll: 'ecr1vt a CL 7A!.c-L T,.. Homeowner, Polo"" ~ T'"e Insulana:.'" hflQ company, ~ euye"'~ '-Quest. cen prtMdt InlQrmtl\()f\ aboulllIe
    aVIIIBbit'y. oeSlrab"lC'I :o~~ra~ .,nd c.oS1 01 vlneus II.. onsurilncz U>v.r~n .no ~aorsemem•. 11 evyer 0""'"
    tlflt oawra~ 0"'.' ltlJrl ""'I
    re<lur_ by mrs parao,ap,"" B"yer Shall rnstTvCI E~ro-o HoIOe< in WtIlJ"~ i1n<1 pay any ~ In co,\.
    13. SALE Of' BUVf:'l.·S PltO/,f.Rn
    "'. ThIS Ag,...,m,n, ,~ NClT ""nllnoent upon t .... sale of any P'o~ own• ." b~ Buyer
    0" e 0 (I' c:ntcr.eoJ T'e Oi!'aCNlcl ~Od.""u", rCA R '0,."., COP) Icgart1'ng !tle oontir\9l!ney lor IIW ~lll of crocl'r1Y _ ...C1 by 8.Jyrr • ~tCl
    nl10 ~ "'9'''e_n:
    14. nNE PEfiIOOS: ~UlOYAl Of' CONTINGE"'CI~S; CANCEL..ATlo-. I'lXiKTS: Ttw ~ng tim. PtFtOCU m.,. D",y ba .....oecI, ~.
    modl1le<l el chat'lg8C by mutva' ","n.n "9"lln'l.nL IJJroj ....... Ov., or CO<T\!IllI~'" Of ~I\ee-llaticn uno.r lhoa p.a~nPh "'ust to. ..., ....nb"G
    (C.A~, Fann CRI·
    10. SEU.EFl MAS: 7 ~or c..: ___ ) Days .lib, ~tanca \Q dthve' Ie fl~r 1111 repQ(1S. O..OO5U.... ana Inlorm~1OII lor _,en Seller r:;
    ~sPOnolb. uMr, pa~llpnl. ~ ~nd B 6A 7e anll lJ.
    B. Pl llllYEI< ",A5: 17 1M ~ __ ) 08ya AlIer ~pta"QI. unlen o ~ :a9'eed \n "'"lIng, IC
    P} ="",I.t. 01 Buy•• In""~'9~IO= aocrt'Yt ~II alsclOsure.. repc~ ane emer ~ ifllo""",llOn. ","1CfI ~ ~OtIYe from ~r: al'd
    ilppro'" ." "lane", a~e:.ng !l'\e P,o~ny (rnQl.lo""" leaO-bOlMO pa""! ilnd ,,-,b_d pllinl haurol n _II as o\heI omormalJcr1 aprCllI8d ,,,
    p.".gr~nh ~ .no ""urablilly or Elvyer and !he Property): an~
    (;11 relurn lu s..1~' S'9nec: Covo.... ~ SIOtu<Dry and lead O~dot~'l!'O ",ovel1:'d by s.t!Ir' '" 8C<:Oroa"Cf wrltl Pr.g'1Cl1: ~
    (2) Wrrnlr mt nmr ~Pec;r... o Ir. 14e(1l. Bvye' may rec:ue~' thaI StH" ""Ok. repa,1'I er ~~. Iny othe' adJOn ~~roill9 tnt Propeq (C.AI<. FOfTTl
    R/l J ~'lQr "~. no ot>*9,IIon ro agree ttl or ~ond to 6uy."a "cuMII
    (3) By rtw _nc c l :... ~ lme sDeCrl,"" In '49(1) IOf 21iOf loan COPltl'lQonc:y or 2.J for "pp"arul con~n!)8ncy), Bo"yer ."all If'\ 'oW1Ir,g ..mow the
    ~Chc.ab.., CC'l\Jngrrey .CAR form CR; or ~nGCI I~ .. AQrMme<1l. H~tl. ~ Iht rol\0WY>9 ".pectJon~. reportS Ol d.oosuf'u ort nOlIT.clt
    WIth'" L"\' /rTrt 'DeClflrt1 ," 1 A.A. rt>.n BU)'ef ha6 5 101 0 ) 0ayI afltr reca;Pl of ~rry ,,,""~, Of ltw tlmt ap.c:ifoaCl ,"
    '.8(\! wt"U\r.er IS I.re, 10 .. me", _ applICable contJnoencY 0' COllla:1 tIl& ~rwe~"1 in ....ntIng: (I) gOVCrnlT'lenl-m:ondlteil tnspec:llOtIS or
    ..po"o ~u.red ..s a rondrtion 04 ~Ing: or (II) Cornm()<\ I_res: D~_s pur.....-.t to paraQraph IS!
    C. CONT1N~TIOH Of C:ON1INOEHC'l' OR CO"lTIU\CTUAL. O~LlGAT10H: sn.L!l' l'tIGtiTTC' CANa:l.:
    (11 Sclle, nght te Cane-I; Buyl' Co"II~: SeN~r. ,Iller firs 1I... ,ng 8uyer a ,,"Otlc. to 8uyer to p~"., ('5 sped11ed belCIWl. rnay caN;81
    IhG A9reemrr.1 ,n ",",ling "NJ
    autho~ rewm of 811)'8(s OOl~oad ~. t7y the _ lpeci\cd in Ihts AQrHrnenl. Bu)'tr CiOeI not I t _ .. w11Il"Q
    It>t .. o~.~~ conbn5~ncy 0' unc:eJ ltHa "IQrMm.nt O~ a~ c:ontlflgen~, Nlve ~n .. moved. t.iurw 01 ~, elJ~r CI Selle'r lD cloo5e
    esc,,,,,, on nme may ~ a b<Ncl' c1 "'. /i,greemtnl
    (2) COnUnu;oIIOfl of CCl~: Even Iller IIW ••p .....lJOn at r..... 1>_ ~peem.o '" , 48('). Burr' retllM !he "lOhl ttl m.>U requaSD to Seller
    ~moYC ,n "m.ng me ~I""'b~ Ctlntlngwlt)o 0< cancel :rus AlI"Mnr>enl ',mtl S.lIer c.:lnc2la pursuaftl ttl '.~1). Once S.I.... .-ivN Buyer'1
    "",,,,.r rlmO'oJ.' or a" ccnbng~noes. St,.r M13Y nm c:anaM """ ,a.;reeml:flI purosuanr 10 1.C(1).
    lJ) S.11tf riSJtTt \0 C;l'1C:t!; Buy.,CoIllrad Obllg.tOo"8: Sellef•• IIt' .""1 9n1rl9 !lllYtr. Nohce 10 8u~r to Perferm (M apeci~ ~}. m.)'
    l:»ncel fh\' Ag~ ,n _1lJ"Q ~ aUlP\:l(~ rei,,", O'f Buyers CHIpc$1l lot Iny 01 N 'll11DW1n; ..-.on.: '" "a.,)'t, f.ia ttl Oeposit f\m~ &!
    /tCJuI""O Oy ';.A cr <?6. (II} rr me ''-'''l!'' o.poMed pU~"ltTt 10 2A Of 26 .... nOl ~ ....,... oeponed: (liil f 8.Jyer rllb to ",0YI0e • ~r a5
    reQurn>C 0)' 2G: (IV) ri Buyer l.aits ttl plO"_ .... foeatJon as f1:qulrccl by :»; or 2L.: r-.} K Sellllf '''LO~ly dtUPCI'oves o1ll\e ".rif_bor prov.,.C
    oy ~ Of 2"- Ivl) n l!lvyel __ Is \0 ne'u'~ Stllutory a"" l..~ D:eclOl>uru :;n 'IQuirI'<! ~ ~raoraph ~2): or (vii) ir 8uyef r.ils to aogn or "'itia' a
    sep~'1Ite 1"",'OI"d o"""ge tom> frr ;~ in~ orPQ$it IS r... ~ by pa'lQf'8pn 1ti s..., ..
    not raquireO &0 !Nt Buyer. NotJec to
    "."orm .. ~ dmg CION 01 Escrow
    14) Notice T() iuyrr 'To p.rform: The P'io\.ClllO Buy ... to ~~rlorrr. (C.A R For'" NeP) s/'lall: {i) be m wmrng; (iiI M .. ~ by Seier. aN! fiil) 9've
    ,2.
    Buyer Wt ..... (or U )
    ~ou" (or unh1tt. urne :sgea/eO I~ l'le ;PPhcMllt Plra"rt.h. w ~ n lUll to 1:1".
    ">e 8PPlOCilOle
    ael"'~ ;. NOtlOO tc B,,~~r to Per!r>rr- nnay .,oc be ~ven any .arl"" ''In ~ Oirya Pnor ac It>e cp,fabon Plliell~:n. lor B~r Ie .. move
    a een''''ge''cy cancel 1M. AQ'-I'l'len! or m~.l Ol 1.~~\ oll'g8t"'" euyerl lr'vtoal5 ( )( ) (E)
    =
    Of

    Sel.f'$ Inl1JlllS : ) I )
    ~."p""lnl to Illf"2011~ CAlIFOI'l"',~ ~OC .......O... OF ,,£.,to,
    ~OFlM. lfII(; I __
    RPA-Clo REVISED '0'02 (PAC!. Of' S) ~-lJy llloIa .",1'1""
    CALIFORI<IA F\£SIOUITl"'L F'URC~S£ IoGREEMli.N1 I~PA.c... paG( .. OF II) r621l'l~11).I.f.X

    601 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p601/679


    '-'C'"
    10122/288'
    OT. I"V"l,)OCLI.
    15: 42..-... .
    t:l~
    31
    31: ,71 48~~~
    . ~~'04 ~;e:f't.l;
    PA(;£

    PAGE 6/15
    as

    ~rOPerty~ntU 3;[ ~ i'G, ;r~". ~JflL'l,a "'",A QC.u2 Dau:sut-hCl flO""

    D. EFFECT OF BlJY~~ ~A1. O~ CQNT1NGENC,e8: " ~r ~ W1 W1l11lg. any c.ont~1lCf Of ~"1ODn rigl'ltl. U111esS O1!lc .....
    ~ofle<: ~ ~ !.Ia~ _ " ~'"mt"nI ~" &.Iyer ~ne Sfo4..... &Jyer S/lIU conclUSl~ boo ~ 10 haw: Il} c:ompIM8Cl .. ~
    IIlvastJgallon! ~M r~v_ of "'PelF\!! a"o O'l~( lllXIIlCIOIe l/I1orml'llon Ind dl"t.!CI$lI·tpS pe'liln.IlQ:O l1'\al co"bn~ Qr c.ane-tW>or1llgtlt III) ~
    1: (lrocc« _ " rM rT4l1&aC11lOn. InC liM] auLI!"'lwC all ,..t>,lty, (e:spcn$lbi~y lno e.penn b R~~ or correCllOflI pettJ~ lei thai ~C'f or
    <.anorll~iCn n;nt or lor ,naoittry 10 cblam fw>~nons
    £ HFl:CT O~ CIlNCELL&TlON ON DU>Oerl",!;: ~ 6~' or S.k~( Qrv., "'''tIlIn noner r:I cenOillahcm p...-m to r.gnll llul1 ~ ~ Ulr
    ~m, ot !hi! Nl,.~men! 8lJ)1tr and Seier a~~ to SrgJ'l muw~1 InSlNClOfa 10 ,--ngel the pit .1Id KCrow anc! re~_ OeooW. leU and -.s
    :.o~ t: :n • ."r1y RfONled Ie t~ +Ur)f).~ Fe~ .. no ~l:! may be pavabitl to "~ pnoVlCl." anc VV1~ lor se",~ IIlCI pr~ p~ ClUm9
    e$Uow It'eltase 01 funas will .-.qui.. mu''''' S'9r-d ........ lnetn>ttlo-. "om &tI)'e, .,d ~1Ief, Judic .. 1 OKalOn 01 arbib _ _ rei. A
    P>rty ~ t-. IUD;e<t IQ iI CIvil peonalty 01 up ~ $1.000 for ,.tvul Ie IWVn su::l1 ins~O'I$ if no OOOCl faith Oi:s~"-,Sf» . . to WIle Is
    emllJe<lIC lhe deposIted fundc 1(;/"11 Coo. ~'~7.]).
    1~ FINAL VERIF1C~ liON Of CONomON: &uyer 5tlat have rt1t IlQI'f 10""~ • lInel '~OJOn 01 ~ PropertY with... 5 ,or 10.,. F'r1D"
    Ie CI»e Of ~.cro .. N01 AS J" CONTING'ONC"" uF THE SALE. bUl ~I.ry t.e corrfrm: l/)lt>e P'looe<1)< 15 m.rna..- pUrs<Jant to p.a~9" 7A.: (ii)
    P.epa"t ~ve ,tor ~mp",,~ .. s ag .....c aM 1111) ~,,,, 'a5 COmpllee Wltt\ 5eller,~, obltllnior\a ~lhll ~,_nt
    16. LIQUIDATECI D'-MAGES; If Buyer ~ilS to compleu this Pt.lfchpe be~e of Buyer's o.faurt, Scl~ sn-II r"«lln,
    CIS Iiquidneo o-mage$, thE ci~ posit iC1uany P"lid. If the PfO~rty is I dwelling wit" no mort than tour unllll, one
    ot which Buyer inlenos to occupy, then the "mount rmined !hall be no mor. than 3% of the purch... prICe.
    Any ellceu shall be returned txl Buyer. Release of funds will require rt1u1Ual, Sign.<! r~M Instructionc from
    botl'l Buyer and Ssll8r, Judicial oe-c/Ston or arbitration aW8 . BUYfR ANO SELl!R SHALL SIGN A SEPARA n
    LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISION FOR ANY INCR OEPOSIT.IC.A.Ft FORM RID)
    I Buy."s I"~. s.nen InitialS
    ,~ D~PVTk JlU0C. UTION
    A. M!:IHATION' P'uier .nc Sl:llr' -0'''' to ""'0,_ any OI~o~..
    Ot cau" a"SiI'" ~n U>e/Tl out vl &1 .. -,,!'eeme<11. Of ",... . . w~ tr1l~n
    b;;!~~ rt<>Cr.I". to ~,eltratIPn or ~un ~or, 1,8(21 and (~\ tlflOw 3\:lP!Y W~r>el QI not lr>e "rtll!a~ pro ...IO
    Pa'.9~ _ _ . .-c\allo_
    t-e. rt Inv ,nail be :/,,,,oeo !lO"lky amo,. l~ p.noe, ,nl/OlvtCl ~. ttl, Iny OI!oQute 0' ~'fT\ to _1C11 thIS paragraph applies V party CDf'I",*,COPS
    .r, .ClIO" ",,"noUI ~"" a~fTlPll"'" 10 resOlve tIlR men~r ltIroup'l med13hCln, or r.fu~ to ~ ~ .ne, a ~lJeSt haa be.n m'-. ~ thaI PII'T)I
    5~"" ncl ~< "nl:b"d 10 rtCtlvar :!!Torney t.«s. awn ~ ~ lO'OUlC 1l"'.rwlSA
    til: 8""ileble Ie lhat party in any SUdl aellCit', 1P4I5 MEDIATION
    0ROVISlON J"PPUES V'h"EiHER OR NOT THE AA6rTRAnON PROVISION IS INITlAL~O.
    s. ARBITRA nON Of DISPUTES: (1) Buyer and ~t~r ~9ree that any dispute or c;~ In law or equity arieing
    br-tWHn them out of this Ag~~ment Of' any resulting troHlS act lon, which I' not settled through medinion,
    shall be (le{;ide-o by neutral, blnd,"g Irbltntlon, IncJUdlng _nd subjeet tel paraSr2pns 17B{2) ~nd (3) btHow.
    Th~ arbit,ator $haU b. a retired judge or justice, or an mom_)' with at last 5 yUts of reaidenba' real ..tale
    Law eXpt'nence, unles the partJe5 mutu."y :t9fH to a di~rent a~orJ who 111811 tender 2111 award in
    auord<lnce With substantive C.ali1ornia L~w. The panJes shalt "live the right to discovery in accordance with
    CalifomiOl COdE of Civil P'ocedU~ §1283.05. In all Dlher .... ~. u.. arbitnbon shall be conducted in
    accordance wIth T"I~ 9 of P.rt III of the California Code of eMI Procedure. Judgment upon the aw.rd of the
    Ubitntor(5) may be entered into an~ court having jurisdiction. Irtterpretation 01 thle agre-efNnt to arbitrate
    shall bt governed by th. F.deral Arbitr"tion Act
    :l) EXCLUSION~ "!lOU MEOlA TImt AWD AFl8rTJU T10t01: Th. follOWtrJQ m_rs er. "eluded f,om rne<tiation anrl artlivabo,,; lill jUOlcl-'
    or non"jU(l,cl.' ft>'-<loIiu... 0' o~ .ction or p~/"g to fl1tO/"Cle i o.e<:I.,. t,ust. m~~ or in9b."",nt Iarxl'" CCM7'aCt _ drfII-.cl
    ,n G,J1if9r"iO Civil Cod" §2t'I!; Hil in unlawful dit..iMr action: (liT) t/'lc filing 01 enforce"'''nt of I mec:twlnl,.. 'lell; and flY) any - u.-
    IS wlth,n mt
    Jurisclietiot1 of. prn~., Vl'WIn c:btim. 01 b.... rvptey t:O<J'1. TIM flli,,~ of. c:eurt .ction to enable Iha r.corlJl"5 01. rootlw cI
    ~ndln9 action. lor0'''' of .~hrnent. re<:e....ership, Inlun~, or olhef prov~'onlll rc""ad_, shill f)Ot c;onstJJu1Ir a _ fJlltle
    rnedoalJem ~nd .rblt~hon provia/ona.
    PI 8RO'H~: Buyer.ncl S.11er 'S/'"
    10 rn.aiatr and arbl~ dl~ or ~rna involY'ng lither or bOth BrOk_, co~t WICh 11 14
    ~nd S, p.ov,"..:! .,l~r 0' ber" Bf'Dkef1i I~ll n.oyc ag...a to such m..:llation or arbftr'allOOl pril:' Ul, 0< ~jn I _onatlIe hm_ IIIIr, me
    d.putlr or cJalm ... ~s.ented 10 a,o"'~ A,., elecUon tll ell,.,., or bOfh .,ollef'S
    III pa"'ClptI. In med~IJDn or erllltralJOIl ena. not ~.
    In Ilro.e~ 1>9"'; ortm.o pert_ tD h A.g_~
    "NOTICE: BY INITIALING IN THE SPACE BELOW YOU ARE AGRfEING TO HA~ ANY DISPUTE
    ARISING OUT OF THE MATTERS INCLUDED fN THE 'ARBITRATION OF DISPunS' PRovJSK)N DfClD!D BY
    NEUTRAL ARBITRATIO"I AS PROVIDED BY CALIFORNIA LAW AND YOU ARe GMNG UP ANY pItlGHTS YOU
    MIGHT POSSESS TO HAVE THE DISPUTE LITIGATED IN A COURT OR JURY TRIAL. BY INI'TlALING IN ntE
    SPACE BELOW YOU ARE GIVING UP YOUR JUDICIAL RIGHTS TO DISCOV~RY AND APPEAL, UNLESS
    THOSE RtGHTS ARE 9PECIFICALLY INCLUDfD IN THE 'AR8rTRATiON Of OISPl/TES' PROVrslON. IF YOU
    REFUSE TO sueurr TO ARBITRATION AFTER AGREEING TO THIS PROVlSION, YOU MAY BE COMPI:LLED
    TO ARIHTRATE UNDER THE AUTHORJTY OF THE CAUFORNIA CODE Of CML PROCEDURe!, YOUR
    AGREEMENT TO THIS ARBITRATION PROVISION IS VOLUNTARY."
    ''WE HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE FOREGOING AND AGREE TO SUBMIT DISPUTES ARISING
    OUT OF TIiE MATT£RS INCLUDED IN THE 'ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES' PROVISION TO NEUTRAL
    ARBIT~ATION'" ~I~-;;;;;---- r -
    SeH.r's In~ ;--- - _ ;0")

    .:.L 7))) (( ))
    Gl
    Bu,.e(s Initilis (

    COP'f""l'" c; 1PP' ·~on CA!.lfO"""" A:I:I(XI..noN 0< ~t.Al ~O.. SC> INC
    RPA-C~ REVISED 10102 (PAGE S OF II - - "'"
    C .... LlI'O'"NlJl RESIDENTIAl. PU~HA8E AGR£EMENT IItPAoCA "AGE ~
    I
    se~ef'5 IMla IS t

    0# II)
    Oot. d -......""
    ""'."
    IC~8'92JQ.a)o,
    "

    602 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p602/679


    <>c",
    1'/2212••'
    ell:

    P,oo.ny AOOre~L3":' 5
    15,42 .61
    LU_lJ\'lt L L t;jANKE~;

    ~~';I:: C!:.rf 8tlTPrJ X B'U. ?


    ~,

    9.o..u.i.
    MARA
    0 271 4e304; •• SEP -22·04 3:~Pij;

    ~·.5Gtest>u.
    PAG:

    PAGE 7/'5

    ~
    ElS

    1tl. PF<OR.ATlONS OF PI'lOPe~iY T...x!! AND OTHf~ IT~MS: Unless :Xhe~ agreed In~, 1M foIIo,.mg l\etns "!'IaN be PAID
    CIYlRENT <1M c.(~I'l~d b~.n 8uyE" ,;me S~lIer _5 Of Cios.e Ot EscJO"" r~aI property I~$ anc lI~m.,..tl;. ,n~5t. rents,
    HOA '..;IUI'H speCiel. ill'll) e~rgeOC)' Oue~ Inc 8S&e5.mentS llTlPO&eO PIlor:c Clc6e Of E~. pr.miurns 00 I1bUranoe a~ed
    o~ Eluyer p"vments or: Dones Olnd _s.menIS a~rned by Buyer. IH'1Cl ~y""nIS on Mel~Roos and other ~I ..... ~ ~
    J'5l'lC1 b0'10s ane 4l5SI?SSmenu met ere now .. hen. T~ IoilOWl/lg ilems sh:;ail be ~!.5u'Tlf!d by 8!J\I'f!.\MTHOUT CREDfT lOW3rd lhe
    p\lCh.~ pn~: pro,iltea ~ymenl' 01\ ~lo-RoO\ and O\~r S~.l ASWUfl"e(11 O'S\no ~ arid lIss.eurne~ and HOA ~
    1!'SI?55ment~ \hill .~C no... ~ "en bu1 nol ,;1lI Oue. P~rty wi~ be rea.~sud upon ctNIngi 01 OWTlefstllP.1VTy 5UPP1emenl:2J tax bill
    shell t>, o3>C <IS follOW! (,) tor perlOCl' .. lIer Do.e C1 E!CTOw. by Buyar: oenom p!'le' 10 CIo!..! Of E~, ""I Seher. TAX
    !'lCI iiI) 10<'
    6:LLS ISSUEC M'iEFi CLOSE OF ESCROW SHA"L BE r-,ANDLED DIRECTLY B~EN BUYER AND SE.L.LER Promions ~~
    b. m;;oe bneo 0:1 _ 3~OlIy month
    19. Wn HHOLDlNG TAXES: Selle r ;;Ina B~r agree 10 eXK\Jle any InSlI'\Jrnerrt. ,!I'l~, sl3t~nI 0( Instrvetion re<lSOflabl)' neeanal)'
    Ie CDmply....,!tl federal (FIRPT,o.) llnd C.li/omlll Wltr'lhokhng Law, rl reQlIlred ICAR Forms AS arod AS),
    20 MULilPlE USilNG SEfl\tlCE ("M~ft): &09-er~ ~r!! lu1hofized 10 r~ lC lhe MLS II peOOInsl SAle and. upon Clo~ 01 E~.lhe
    lem" cf tnl~ 1r.,c.~;,OIOr: te be publl,hee llno dj,!>erT'U/)$Ied to peniOna .no ""~! authorlZli'd to U54! Itle r1tormsuon on le.-me
    aJ:prove-o by Ihe MLS
    21. EOUAL HOUSINC O~PORTUNliY:Th~ JOroperty IS ~ld in compliance WltI'\ le<llll I'il I. 51."f: ;tnel ~I ilnti·d4c.,mor.aUon 1.. _ _ •
    :l2. AT10RNEY FEES: In any aelton prou~o....,. or :;artlU8tlon ~een Buyer ""0 Seller a""lIlIl OUI 01 tnIs Allree~, the prr.tll6ng
    E'uyer or Sf~l?' !>hAIl be entrtll!'(l Ie re.8$:lnabl« anomey 'ees a'lCl OO$U from t'"
    non·p~.iIiTlQ Buyer or SeIer. Pcapl IS ~ In
    p.. ragra~h 17A.
    n. ~ELECTIO" OF SERVICE PROVIDERS: If Bro"!!'" '~er Buyer 01 ~~ to ~~, lIenOOr!. or selVa Of prt)duc:l provider,
    (-PrOl/lders'; br(>.l?r~ 00 not ~uarinlee lhe pe,-formal1Ct 01 NTy PrO\llc.r~ Buye, inc! ~~r mlJ)' aliiQd ANY ~IOVlO«S of thell own
    ct'l005lng.
    24 TIME OF ESSENCE ENTIRE CON"TRACT: CHAHGES: Trme is of In. flS~8nee. All uTlOQn;LBndings beTwJet\ ~ parties e~
    11COrpOrorteC! In lhl~ Agreemrnt "$
    18rm~ are onttr'\oeo Oy thOi p~ 015 e flnai, COfT'ptel. and eJIdlJllve elr~i~n of tl'le11
    Agrl?Emem ""lin re~cr to It. suo/eel man~, and may nol be contriIdieled by revidPnce of any prior aQrerment or OO<11emporaneOUI
    ~r<l1 flqre-empm H any prov'f'on elmls AGrHmeflI '5 !le'lClto De In.-heCtJVe or Invaliel. Ihe rern;Jlt'1I~ provisi01\ll .... il neva~~ be
    :rven fL;H 10rce ana "fl.cl. Neit~ th;. Ag,eeme", nor any prt7Vl$ion in it may be .. "t.ndrd. amene.d. moclr~. 81Wf>ed Of
    Ch''''9e<l, .JIC
    II pI In writHlS Signed by Buy•• and Seller.
    2~ OrHfR TERMS AND CONDITIONS, including a~eo SUpplelTlenls

    A. ~ Buyer's Inspection Adv~ory (CAF; .~F~,,~rm~8;;,1~A)!L~..,.... ~ ,-- _
    8, 0 FUfc1'1il~e AQreem.rn Aooendum (C •. R Form PM OOlr~pt1 numbtrl: )
    ;;, S~ll ...r to 12".L.£~.v ,--lo.llinq CO.n", ,Ml &tl aJIlq\ZZl.t nQC to fIi'Ic,- 21 (~ p.re&!ltl o~ chI t'UOal
    purdo.,u t:r~c. /jell cr ... noO! Uw ~ b\lYll.l; hp.l.d.t • c.l.i tN'uU 1lr.s' E, U tc L.1 e"'".

    26, DEFINITIONS: As usQ'd m tnis'Agr~~Il/'


    A ",AccepGInc6'" ~,ein~ the lime ltlE offer or r,~ ceunler offer L5 eooepled '" wnbrlg by Il PBrty -el is ~elrver~ to .nd ~~on.lly
    rec~lv.d by t!'e Olr.er party or tl'181 party $ lIuthoraed lIgent In 1lCCO~ wittl the term:; of lhia ener cr. final coun1er o!ter.
    6. "Agr'PQm....• m~&n$ ttl. terms and condM,OI'l5 01 ttliS eecrpl-el c.lifcmie ResIOentilil Pvrc!'13ee Agreem.nl ena any : a ~
    couf1Wr otfe~ anO aCCenOa
    C. "C.A.R. FOtm" rnetns t"e s~c;ific form r.~'enc:ed or imottle r comparable fo,", a9'1'ad :0 by the pllrne$
    D. 'Clo$t Of E:5crow' nellrts ~ dale IT',e gran! ~, or Ol!i9f h"denot of tl<lmler of tme. i' re=rdeC. ~ ~ ~ ~ dose oi
    ~scr()V\o tall~ on , Sa 1Uf'd By. SU'lOiY or lega holi<'ii1Y. It>6n do5e of escrow shall be the ~ bU8ine~ day aner till 5d'HiIduied
    et~ of ~scrow oate
    E. ·Copy" ""-<lans :;Opy by any means incJucinr; phctocopy, NCR. filt::5imlle and eteOTOn,c.
    F ''03';." ~ans calenoa r Cl<lYS. lJnle~! otr.erwiH fllQUlre<! by ltw
    G ·Oays After".,..,.. aM5 the speCrflP.O number 01 calet1aar cays Illltr tilt! OCOJrTence of the event specified nol COLTItJng tnll calenQ4lr
    OllIe on ~oc.n me !PeC:f '80 evem OCCU". 4lnd ending al 11 :59PM on the fmil day.
    H -0."5 Prier" means I~ ,,~l'IeCl n\lmber of calena.r Clay?> beiorll Itle occurllnce 01 the e\lQOl ~~, r'OI ceurrtinQ th4a
    C<llenOIil Cile on """'~ Ihtl specHled ....ent is ~uled to occur
    I. '·Electro....' Copy" or "EI~tronic Signaturll" rTresns :15 apphtClble. in .,ectrorllc coPy or iS190,nn CMlplying with Cah'ornie
    Law Buyer and Seller lIgret thel electrontc mean, Wli not be u&ed rJy erther Deny 10 modify or atter the content or inlegnty of IhlS
    A9reeme n: Wllhoullhe knOW~g. il~ OOf'IMra or l~ ahar
    J. "Law" melin, any law, COde, SlaMe. ordinance. fW>gul4lllon. rule or or:ler, wl'IIct1 IS 8dOPt~cl by a contlolling city, county, r.uae Of
    1e09f'4l1 leglslal:ve j;Jcio411 or e:reoJlrvw body or agel'lC)'
    K "Notice l" 8uyltf tD Penorm" ml?i1T1S a t1OQ)merrt(C.A.~ F'orm NBP), which Jhall be In writing and S4g1'1ed by S.. ~ Ind shaM
    ~i~ Buret al IQ8st 2~ /'lours lor as otherwlH $peCiflJ>d in par;igraph 1~(")) Ie TerTlOlle ;;I eontlngency or peno"" .5
    aDpheat>l~
    l. "I'lep;rirs" me3nr; a~l' '~p.". ('ndUellng pest canUOI). ellerar'ona. replll~m.nlS. moOifiCJltlol'll5 or T1ItrofiUing 01 the P~rty
    prOVlOeO lot' un~r trois Agree~nr

    M ·'Slgn~d'· '''elln~ eITher <I ~.:lndwrtnl'n or .lecrro~lIC 5.g.... tl.Jt'e on an origin:;a! ooc:umet"!t. Copy or :;any counterpart
    N. Singular ~nd Plural I.'m~ .Ole"! incluaE trle oln..r, ....hefl appropllate

    euy.rs InlT,aIs ( /7~( ~(


    _
    c"~,.cgc·, c' ~~,,:CO; C,\,'~O"NLA A$SOC(t.T'ON
    1'lPA..cA REvISEO 10102 (PAGE' OF 81
    or RfAl -:-ORS4P INC

    C"UFORN!~ R£.SICENn.&l PURCHASE ,AGRI>ENENl rRPA-C.. PAGE 6 O~ III


    I Selle's
    ~~ ~y
    ,,,It..,, ( ....L...../!7
    -
    Oaw
    I
    I
    . ..--
    (5)
    ........
    ',
    T62'92)IlJrX

    603 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p603/679


    HV22/2eElLi

    Proc::-rtY
    _ ,. -

    Aoor-.:$$
    ... ~ ~'"''''

    ~2hl $
    IS'"
    10- f-
    .tII"
    ~-'lnJ:n I

    fC~_::r·7E A«.etly en 6·':;"


    31 C 27, 4834 j

    ca 9Qi'u
    MARtl
    •• SEF'22'04 3:~5P~;

    - - - - - - -_ _ ~·,l;.H........
    PAG:

    4
    PAGE 8/1S

    6QQ'
    Hl

    27. AGENCY:
    A DISCLOSURE: &lyer .no Seller 'lac:-, acJu'lowl~ onor r!?Cerp< of C.J.R. Form Au "lli$Closure R9~ro,,·\~ RUJ Em~e ... ~
    Rel;;lllOnYlIP$
    e. POHNTIALLY COMPE'TING BUY~S AND SElLERS: Evyer and Sl!ll(or eaeh bdnowle<1ga receipt of • d~r. 01 ltle
    pos!ibdrty of ,.,.,ull'PIe re"r~5ent_~on by ltlE oroke, reprue:ltlng \fl,t ~.TlO~. thIS [)t$dow~ may be pOlr; 04. IISOlOg il~emem..
    buyer-brOKe<' _greem"n1 or sep.ral. documem (CAR Fonn DA) f,~r unoe~t~nds ~1I1 Broll,r rep~nt"'g B~ may also
    represer:r other potef1l1al ouy4trs ....mo rn~ woalder, ma"e offer! on or ultJme~Jy acquue the ~pet'ty, Sal~r lII'l~tands rI1it
    E'ro$.er reoresenl~Q 5.111:' m"1 also repre5ern other ~rs with com~t)f)g properties of inlerpslto This BU)'er.
    C CONFIRl\ilA nON' "The /nilowing ilgency r~atian&tllt>s are nereby l':oof!rrTle(j /cI'ttl.. lrcins.aetion:
    L,stin. Age l ll - - - - . - . Colct-ell "'"m (Pril'r1 F'rm Name) " ttl. ~
    of (c;I~Ck one) :::~ S~lter e:rclu61..ety or 0 both the Buyer and Seller.
    Sdlng A~nT __ ~.-..:: (Or; aip .R.5.i..4tar-& (Pllnt Film NIl"..) (if not P.a~
    -s L i5lJ "S Agent) is lne .g~nt 01 (=heet< 00il): ~ the Buy.r eJ<CIUSlllf'fy: or C the Seller WJdu5l\l.~ 0< 0 balM t~ 5uyf!r Ind
    Seller RelIl E,Wt" Oro<('[s art r,o: pe"~ Ie rnQ Ag~"'" /JetWl!pn 8uyer .nd Seller.
    211. JOIP<li tSCROW INSTRUCTIONS TO ESC"OW HOLDER:
    A. nw followinsl pa~~ph" ~ ;opp"~b.e portJonl ~ , of 1hr.1 A9""m ..nl conetitute ttw IOinl .5Crow irurtructJOI\S of
    8u~.r and Sell.r to Escrow Hokll-r, "'hie:t1 E.saow I-Ioloer " to use llong with etl')' rllililted counter otIer5 :3n<l OllCOeoo&, line any
    l'd='l-enal 'nUll/sl IflMruC'lions 10 Close I!'e esc~' " 2, 'I, 12. 138, 14E, Hi. 111. 2~. 258 and C, 26, 213. 29. 3.2A, 33 ~n(l
    poragraph 0 0' ml' seC1Jon lrtlf'd Re..!I E~lMl: Broker'!> on p_gt I'J If", Copy 011/'\1 5I()ilr.re oo~on &gr~ment(s) proI.I~
    tor In paragrapt' :is or 3:2J., or Ddr.!llilrllpto D of the 5eCllOn titled Real Esta~ Esroke~ on ~
    ~~O wrtI'l ~ Holoer e is
    by Broker, Escrow HOI~r $hall accept sUCh agre-ement(5) lind payout trom Buyer'5 or Sejjers MO.. or both, •• aPPlicab6e. th8
    Srok~(! compen!llll~ prt)VIo~d lOr In ~uc:", atl~s), The l11rm~ ~nd mncl~lOnf> of this Agr~emen1 r'lOI seI torth In h
    "peclf~" pllragJilpn~ l!I~ "co'tlOnal mGlll~~ tor I~ L'1torrT\OltlOn of E~row lo;olOer. but aboUt whietl Esuow Holcier ~ not be
    concerl"le<l BUYQr.nd Sellef wili re~lIe Escrow Holder' general pro\li5ion. olnedy from Escrow Holder .n<! wi" -.cu1lI Iud'l
    prO\lI$'ons L'pon EsCrOooN HoloQrs reQues:. To the urent lh~ general PI'O\IISIOn:! are rncollSlmrn or con"d willi tt"Uf> ~enl,
    It'le Defleral CW'CIII~lon" will control ~ 10 Ine dUTies ano obli9<ltions or EIO'OW HOloer only. B\lyer IlnQ Seller will exeCI.II~ il<ldlhonal
    In~!tUclion5, documents and forms prOVlO4td ~ E!n'OW Ho,de( lI'1l1l .re fe;alOn.;;lb!y neoenary Ig dose Ihl e500w,
    8. A Copy .A lhilS ~reernent 5~'J be de~VI'~ Ie E$Cfow Holder WlltlWl 3 bll5~ days .fler .cc~nce
    lor C - ). BU)'ef and s.ller autt'ooflze E.,crow
    Holder 10 "ceepl rmd re'y on Cople'1 lind S'gn!lturea ItS defined ,n ltIis A.greemenl 115 oriilinil8. 10 open escrow af\Cl for gther
    ourpo~" of escrow, Tne lIalld'''' ot rI1i5 A.gre-emem ill tle~n B~r <lind Sder ':I 1"101 iif'ected by ¥/turl..... or ...hen Elcrow
    Holder Sign, thiS Agreem.nl
    C. 8rok.er, lire e Plrty 10 !til' ~crow tor trw 'o~ purpoU> of compe~<!tion pUf'5USnl to pa'419r3ohs 29, 32A _00 parllgr.ptl 0 of t~
    SectIOn (Illeu Rel l Estate Brc~t'rs on pgt 8, Buyer irld Seller irrevoc.ilbl'y ./l~n Ie 8rt*ers co,"pen~ ,~ed in
    pariOgr&ph:l 2~ al"lCl 3Vo" reiPe-cLJ"..-,., and IrrltV008blY Instl'\lCl Escrowv ~r to Qi$burse thoY tunas to ()m"." al Close Of
    Escrow Of ;;.urlUOlm 10 any O1her m\AU~y t)leClneQ caf\t%lIatJon agreemefl\ C~en~lI\l()!'\ instt\lC1tOnS can be .~ Of
    rellok.a only WIth th~ ...,.mli?n CO'1l5enl of BrOkers, E~crow HolOl!r stlalJ Immediately nOfify BrOken;: (I) jf B~'. ir.lllaI or any
    aiditJoMI depo$ll IS nol mace pv~u"'ll to this Agreement. or IS flOt good at time of deposil with Escrow Ho~r; or Iii) it Buyer
    ano SelIE" in~t:LJc. E~erow >1ol6er 10 cenceJ .sao...
    D. A Copy of Iny am~nome"l IhIlt affect& any per.graph of this Agrwement lor whien Escrow HOlder i, re.pona.b'e st\8W be
    d£>Mred lD Escrow Holdpr wltnln 2 bu!lines, days ener muru81 1l1e<:u100n 01 the amendment
    2S. BROKER COMPENSATJQN FFlOIol elTYER: 11 Olppiiclt>le. upon CIO~ 01 E:'l:lOI'W, Buyer agrees to pay compenSllticn to Broker a,
    :;Dl'cifoeQ in a ~ePltrate ""'T'Tt'.ef\ il9'eemellt betwee-n Buyer and Broiler
    30 TfP\MS AND CONDIiION! OF OfFER:
    This IS Gin oH.r 10 purcha$e me Propt>nv 011 tile above te~5 lind C>ndl;lOns. All paragfil~hS with apaces for .nlllfli. by Buyer cmd
    Seller are lflCOrporarec ,n tnIS Agre1tmenl only it In,h.led by _II DirtieS. '1 al IWlSl oni but not III partltS initial, 8 COLTIW on.,. i!
    reQuin~o U'I,I ~reemenl IS rcache" S-'lPI has tt1l' rignl to oonllnUe to ofhlr ttl; P ropeny tor $2le and 10 aC'Oiptany Ol:ler offer It any
    "n'le pnor 10 "ol'~call"" of "~encz, Buyer has re;JO ana &c;lI.nowle-OgtS reclIlpC of a Copy of Itle olf" OInd -9f'&e6 lQ 1he ~
    confJrTnatron of agency relationships. tt ltli.s o~er is itCCepted 81la Buyer ~ublequently defaults. Buyer me)' be rel;pOnl,ble 'Of'
    cayrnent 01 Brol<e~' e::unpens'l1lon This Ag,eement ano aTr)' llUPP'-'~'\, ilOOenOI1tT\ or modlflc:;rbon. inc:.tud'f\g .ny COPY. mey be
    Slgn~O ," two or more COu<11Ir::la"S OlU of whidl $11;11 eon&IItUle O~ ariel tile samf writing.

    CO~yropnl:: 'P9'·200, ';'>'L'/''::~''llA Assoe-IAno", or REAl.l0~~. ,....


    ~I'''"C.A FlEVISED 1CY02\pAGt: 7 OF S)
    c
    1'\0.'......., l>'f D.r.
    BUller'1

    r;o:
    In~15
    S.lIer~ In~lal:l
    (
    I
    m)( ) ~ 1( )

    ~~
    eA L1FO~N'''' J<E.SIOENTlAl PURCHASI!: ... QREEMENl ,,,,,.A-ea ~"Gf 7 OF II) n~.t2;Il.7."'\

    604 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p604/679


    v~ .. ,
    ,,/22/2••'
    01.
    ,,,"
    ", ..iL.LJl1t,-C
    ',631
    tlANlI.kH; 31C ,71 .e~j
    MARA -..41 SEP·22·04 :=:5ep~;
    PAGe:

    PAGE gJ15
    11

    ?rol)e't"T}'AOO,.,,:,J,2Y '; feci pr-rc AcrP>Cly 01,,13 a 9&J21< DIU ,$,epC_b«t" ,2D04

    3'. r.XPlR..I lION 01 OFFE": Til.. ~r .h." oe ~ reVOI<ea "n(l ne J~S~ """11 ~ rewmec l.In,"-, v-. ofter IS SIlJ/leC b~ Seller and a Copy <11 ~
    Sosn9'O otl~" pe'~onally reoe ..... " b)' au"". or ~Y . ....., '5
    ;lu,r>o'atC 10 ,....".,v. " by ~OO PM pc me '0'''' Ullenea, OilY • lie, ttl" oil", oS $1Q1led by ~r (0'. _ ~. C by

    --z;:: -. 0· (001_). ~ - 0 ~Io\O f"t,I)

    ~~I~E:-~~3t('4i.i ~~ ~~E-R-~---------- -------


    N;v?:,41 s~ _

    --~--~==
    92£J~ ~
    (F'rnt iIl"mlj
    l..Z..? 7 ; S a ;.J t: N S ~ z:=.L. ;,p" AnQ<':'e5 Q __ (PM' 'Ume)
    (JldO~)
    32. BS'l~IiR

    J...
    COIl'IPEIrCSA TION "ROW SElLER:
    Upoo Clo•• ~ E~. Selle, ap""~ to ~'Y CO/T'oPo8":.t>on Bro"r u spe~ "'. _ a l t
    wm.t\ aQ . . ...,..1l1 Dt'-1 Selle,.nc er'Ol<.er
    tlJ

    ff ~ de>M 001 ~. co~n.:at,Cn IS o'y~~ as .... cifleo In l/lal 'eQll~ llffrn." '~'!leml!lT!
    B.
    33 "'CCEfYTA~ OF OFFER: SQ,I" w;""alS 1011 S~"r II _ own.'
    "'til« ProoerT)-. 0' n•• !he tuthorny 10~. trIJl A9_rIl S~,~, III'
    ~Oovt olfer, :lp'''' Ie .~I t~. Prppt"y on tnt aDCMl \lImTS &'10 CDnCltJornl. Qg-.e5 lt1 the abOve ~ of....."c:y re~Pt s.J'-r I'IIS ,/Xl
    rue ~no .Cinow.-o\1M "'Cor'lll of _ Copy Ol t1lIS Ag~rnenl anc lIultlO"z~ £ltet<.er III aen,.., a Siglltd Cepy 10 &)'tI<
    i:J (If cnt..eOAd) SUBJECT TO ATTACHED COUJo/Tffi O!'""I!R. [)IlTE[) . _
    O~t<; Dare _
    SEll~· ~_ _~ SElla<.
    ~Q~'Pb z.~~·~ _
    (Pnnl "'.rlMl fPr1n'~

    JAO,,,.-' --------
    I
    ~.i;1-I'-J-- .
    CDI\I~IRlrIlATiON OF .CCE~TAIriCE.: A Copy 01 S,gned ACCCtllanoe \II.' ~nally ~OI!>Ived ~y B<Jyer or ~~r"' 1IU!tl~
    ~nl on (O'll'!) at _ C AM 0 PfoI. A blftCl1"ll Ag,..menl Is crearllld ~
    a COP'!' of SlQ'1l!d A~nce Is N"on.IIy reulvtCl by Buye, cor Buye'-s author~d ~nt wtteu.. or not eonfirmftf In
    ttl~ Ilocum...,t Compl"\()f\ of this to~on ~ not 119Jllly requir.o in ~r to crnla • tlind'ng A;rwment; • is s~
    IrTlerwltCl to eVlOI"nCol v- dar, lhat CcntlfTn.lio" of ACUllU.- ha. oc:c~

    REAL esTATE S"OKERS.


    "- /'tea/ utOlt.e !rok.et:l are nol ~"- to U\e .'!l-'Tlent bttw.en 8~rand ~I'-,.

    5. A ~ .....lan_ ..'p. a. .. connrrn-d •• ~QIeCI,n POI"'Il~pl'I Zl.


    C. It .peClf'e<:l .., pOIrOlQr.pO 2,A.. "'Qc-........o ~.-bmilled"'" ler ~"~, adtno"~ ltCllIPI ~ CleP<*\.0""
    0 co~TING BJ<O ....15Il COMPENSATiON: LI5t'ng !ilrol<t r .g"H Iowy COOP"~~ 6~r I~.'''ng 'wm).ncl Coope..-t'''9 D""'-er 8ll"~ 10

    wo,(t11N Prooerty 15 alterea tor


    CBCI ~_n Lrslln'] 9rOo,.,.."" C4lOperahllQ 8rt>ller.
    u_
    .COIot out o! LI"I1lf"\Q 8,C)lo..w ~ p,ooeeas '" asaQ"'. (I) ~ amlunl ~eQofw:d In 1t>t r..ILS. pro"'Oec ~f2llnQ ~, ~ • lO.rt....- 01 tile ~ ,n
    or • ree.proc;ll MLS: pr (II) :-' (;1 c;r.• CI<.o) Ihe .mgum lIlledMd In II .,.parMe ~n ag_1ll ICA~. ~orm

    RIO' Es~le e'OI<er 1S.11o.,,; F"trm) ~'::lJecoio G:r:.:£rin 1«<»1 toU


    By .• . .. -- Oty ,l.CI.1
    ~
    ~~.u.. S'meVJ 0 •• S«zt9lW8r 4 2004
    .Juz.,J_,
    AcXrtSS ~~.~.U.!!9.Qd lk?ol_vard ~Q 2,p 90021
    i"lQp none (3101-17'-UJ~
    _ _ F•• /32.11 441-jlJ78 -
    E·~ I nUAlii Pk1 ,. II" 1 . '"""
    P'.;lJ E~Utr BrOker ,lAtl"~ F'ITTl) ~ldw_ll s.va-~
    By D_
    IIPOIllS' - C>ty St-'t q
    I.'" P "0'" .. F,. E-maIl
    L..---.----

    ~ ~ H ~ ACKP.oWl.!DGtENT.
    ~Clc.. ,"oIcIer 2t~no .. rovh ~PI o~;l C09Y of !hI:! .Apre.... I1f. (I' c~.cl<..,. CJ II ClepO$I' ,n 'I-e ;moUl1/. ofS ).
    ..:ount'-~' m:mbel' _~
    , ana ag~s '0 """
    ;oct", EllO."" HellS.r suo,.ol ,p Pilra9~t 21 01 '!hi. ~. .-ry
    ""pple~ntal eseo* l~stludlOn, ~ ll':. '....... of !IG/'OW HolOers gefteral prOVISiON
    E.er.,...- Hol()er '~,OVISet: ltIlIl til, 0I1t 01 :onItrrTlJlJ«1 0( AOf»tl1lIn~ o! IN Ag....-menl as b«Wetn Buyer 'nd S.ller ill
    EKlOW H,loe' _ ._ _ _ _ _. E"t'O'f' C
    By ... OM
    AdCrwU _ _ _ .
    P'><>M.lfaVE·/T1aI1 _ _
    - -
    E~rr"." t1clOel ~ I=ec ~ me C,olom-a c.~ <.>1 0 Co!~on,. Q 'na..>ranct.O RIoal E:staW. l.>ooft&e •

    '-_:- -) Rf.JECT!ON O~ OFFER: ~ counter


    IOarel
    of'lor •• b,ln!3 maol? Thic ~ff8r was r..,;e.ed lII'ld re,ecMCl ~ ~ o~

    rSall"-. Inltlalsl ..
    T... ,o fNlM to\AS Bl!£" APPROVED By "fHt C"'L"O~~ .....~~OCIA ... 'O'" OF "£,o.l rOR~ Ie A fj J .... 0 ~'P"'E~£"1"T10N IS IoIAOI M TO n<1 L&GAl V"L101n' Of'\
    .. OlCUACV OF """ .... ClVIS'C)N ,~ AN~ sPI;C'FIC -"-""'$A,CTION " /l6"'C .s>",n
    ElROtI:!'lt IS TI1I Pf"~ aU"'t'~lro TO ~ ON RE.<ll [S"T..TE
    T~~~ilO"'S. IF VOU D'.<:,r\C lfGAl ell TM ADVlc.E CON!lU~ T AN A~~"OPI'l'ATl PROFESSIONAL
    T>-o. '0''''''' .... ,.t)Oc"" "..
    e, ''lC ~""'" ..... "'21~ ""'u~ 11'. n,,,
    mlly b. uled 0",", c, rre",-.~·"'. lolA "I0""-L
    .,,-,<;.'. .o.ssoc,,,
    nON OF ilEAL TO/lSSwno ~,D1Crit>. Ie '" Cooc t>f E~
    "''''0''",'' '"
    OOCt'lJly ~ .....- . . . /lEAL TO~ REALTORili 1$ ~ ~~rea COIIlC'll" ~p man

    ~~ C...ler,,;
    Pu~blJ1.0 AaOC'31lcn
    ~
    or tne Q'
    1111· .tJ('!Jlf1lf1 1rY ~'WP'..M'"
    R~Al TOR~
    ~CCy 0.- =:J ~
    .... -_.~~

    RPA.C.I REVISED '0102 ~PAGE 8 OF !)


    C... WFORNIJl Rf51~NTlAL PU~CH.SE AGREBlE'1fT (~A·C. PAGE I OF I) T~l}LlO.Jrx

    605 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p605/679


    1.12'12'"
    .,,,,,. I: 1'.
    15,42 • .Al
    V" .. ~ ~ L bA"~R; ::, c 27~
    MARA
    48304;
    Ea. SEP·'2·Q4 3:57PMj
    PAG:.
    PAGE '0/15
    12

    ,~
    C"ll~ORNT"
    A~'()C II\Tl0'"
    BUYER'S INSPECTION ADVISORY
    Of "- r A l 10 R.S'
    I c.... .R Form alA. R~ '0IU2)
    prDper:y,<.oarQSS ~;" :;. P.Ji-L..;:r:> ...... ~l" H:!.llr;, CA Sii;'U rF~rtyl

    A IMPOFlT ANCE OF PROPE~TY INVESTlG.A nON: The prlyslC30 COndition of rtI~ land ano ornproVem8tb beong P'JretlIIse<l IS rlO1
    g~rameed Oy "'lh.. r $e!l.. 0, oroke'S For thIS reOl~n, you snould COflclUd ttlon>UQh inv~~~tlon. of lTle Property per5O,....,ll~ and....,~
    P,o~ .. 5!lonel~ wtlO snoulC provlO .. wntten r"J'lom of 'he'r IrTV~l19atJons. t.. gtner!! Prl~ICOlI "SPPClIO!'\ lyPIC3l1y don 'lol cowr.l aspe<n
    01 l~ FIONI1)' n::>r ,ternS ;;fftetlng !No Property Ihat are no1 phy~K;aAy kx1ne<:J on lht Pro~ny tf the proteSSlO1'lMs ~mrne1Cl 1urtr4r
    InvEsh""t I Of1S ,nduo,r9 a reCO("1menaal1Onby a pes! COntT~ oper8lor 10 I~Ped ir'laCCesSltll. a~;. of the P~rty. you .~Id CXlntad
    qu~lrf,ec e>rperu 10 CO()OUCl s~ ~ddihon" In~II98t1on$.

    e BUYEF. RIGHTS AIIO DUTIes: You ,"",1\"


    ~ ;rlf"rm.lill" ClUly to e •• ,~ ",.a!>Onllbir care to oruled your~r, a'1~ng dlaocvery 01
    t~ I~I. I:'rllC'ClI and t~r1r)jc.:l1 Irnp'CZlIOM of d,sclo5t-d taos. .ana trle 1I"I"'~lJ9Il\Jon ;;Ind ".rrllcellon of ''''torm~tIor1 .nd hK:ts lha1 you
    Know cr that OIre .....1lJ'\ln yOU! diligent atlQrlt10n ano ob~alion. Thl purCl'l»e egr~ 9'"e5 you ~t ~ht to "we'l1gat.e ~ Property. If
    \,Ou exerOSf this "9hL ~nc you should. you must 00 50 In llC~ with the term, of tNIC agret!'!Tlenl. n.is lilt be;U w-v for you to
    ,,'meet YOLlr~r. II IS ert~ly ,mponanl tOf ~u 10 read <ill ...ritter, repclft! provj(J~ by pro~onal, and 10 d~s.! l!'le rHruIts of
    Int>pecllOM WIt!" thE- prcfes~O!lGI w'lo conoUClH: Ihe 'nt;peolon. You have the right ro request that SeIer tT\Ike rep;;ll'" correctIOns or
    :.I<~ other 1'010(\ o.. seo ,Ipcn Item, dlscov~",o In your ,nYesllg;hons or Ol.closed 0'1 Seiler. If Sel~r is UnwilWlg or unable lo ... ~ your
    rt'ou~!itS. or you de not INOinl to pun:h;nt- the p~ in Its OIr>dosed ;;Inc ol&CO\oleP'ed condrtlOn. you Ilave ltle roglll to '4rlC11l rM'
    agreement r1 you act WIth", sPeCIfIC tllTl' pef'lOtU if you 00 not anc,,1 ~ .tir~ment In a tlmety ..FlCl proper ."an,..." you mlly be in
    0'" ecn 01 comr.--'

    C SE~ER R/G~TS AND DUTIES: ~Iler IS -eQu'red to dlSClO'" to you mIll.nal foldS kno.om to hmlher t!\aI af'lea tile ",-.e or
    ~irClbility oi l/'Ie Property However, Sellgr may "01 be aWille of ,ome ~ropet1)' <leteas or COnditiorl5. s.Illr coes not have an obIigallon
    to ,n~p.c;1lt\t Proj'erty for your oereftl nor ~ Seller Oblig"l~ 10 reparr, COrred or OtherwiM! curt lIna-> liefce:ti thaI ere disd~ 10 you
    0: ,(eVloL~ty I.In~nown defec:1s fNlt lST'1' dts=v&Rld by you or yOUl Inspeoo'!> Qlmng ~OW. The purcha$e e~ent ool'gatws Seller to
    rna~e the Property avallllble to you tor Ir"esl,~iotl6.

    D BROKER OBLIGATIONS: Brokers 00 nor havt clXpertin In Oil ar~ '1'10 'thPl'etorI C2f11101 a<:lvl!e you on many rtemts, auc:ta as .oil
    slOoility. g.OIogK 01 ",wlfenmerual condTlieras, hazardoua or I~glll ocr.1rolled ,ub'lanc&~. S4TVdural cordtiOfls 01 \I'll foul'lOllton Of omer
    \mpl'ovemenls, or!tlQ =ndltlQI' of!tl. roof. clumbinQ, helting, 81r CD"<1lIion\~ e~l<:al, ~, ~ic. «;ute d~. or ottler ,ynilm.
    The only w .. y to .~l.Jralely ~erm..,. Iflt ConOl1)on of the ~ 111 through an ,n3Pedlon boy en eppropr"m: p,*"lonoIl by .-oed
    yo," If 6rOloer 91"t' yeu re~rra15 10 ~"cn profe..sof\li!s, e,"*cr Cl0e3 not 9ua~t" tt..-r per1o<ma~. You may ••Ied any protvs.sional
    oj YOur c1'1D<JsJnS In YleS Inuolvlf\9 residentlal ~If'ng. with no rnorv tttan four unit&. Brokers have 01 ct.Jty to ~ • diligent vlsUei
    ,mDec\IOn 0' the llO:I'SSI~ ereas 01 the Propeny end to 018clo5e !I'll' resUlt! 01 that nspeClIOO. Howewr, " Somt Prope11y del.ct, Of
    C{)nd~lOnS rn.oy "01 be (jl5CO"or;bl~ frum a 1I/lilJal In~Glion, it ',. P08$ible S~~ en! not aw..... of lt1em. H YO\J ~•• nlered inlll a
    wrTIer. aCrt!err.ent With • Eroll~r, tne ,;pedhc term. of ltllt &g~nt wi' olOtprmirv 1I'le n~~ and LV1eflI CIt h I Brokers duty '" you.
    YOU JlJl,E STROt+GLY ADVISED TO I~VESTlG"n THE C:O"DIlION AND SUnABlLfTI OF A~ ASPECiS OF THE PROf'ERTY, IF'
    YOU DO NOT DO SO, YOU A~! ACTING AGAINST THE ADVICE OF QAOI'(!R$.

    E. yOU AI'\E ADVISED TO CONDuCT INVESTIGATIONS Of THI ENT1RE PROF'ER'TY, INCLUDING, ElUT NOT LIMITED TO TliE
    fOl.LOWING:
    1. GENERAL CONDlTION Of' THE PItOP!RTY, ITS SYSTfMS AND COM"ON!~S: Founaallon. roof. plumbing, t>eating. 8Ir
    ecndit,onlflg. el~cttlOll. mechMrc:a1. 8eQJrty. poollapa. Oll'oef stl'uCtl.Jf'll1 and nOOrrSU\JClurlll system! end components. fiJrtures,
    b'lII!-I'1 ;apphnCQ5 IIny Pf'raoniill prooerty included III the ~1Il, ."d e~rgy e1Ticienc.y at tile Property (S\rudulaf engll'leeta are ~
    suited to dec~rTTlIne po..c>l, oeaign or construction defects. IIf'l(l wtlfttler Improvements are Sll\lC.ur.~y 5OUrd.)
    2 SQUARE fOOTAGE, AGE, BOUNDARl!S: Sq~re itlOUlge, room djmen~lons, Jot SIZ'. Bge of improv.ments and bounda,.es. Any
    "u~1'1C81 ''12le~'''h legardlng tt1.u i1"rM are APPROx,IMJlnONS ONl'f and have net been -wenfleO by $elle:r and QMol be
    .... n;led by BrOl<e..., I'encet, hcages. walls rltalning walle ana ot!'ler nal\JraI 01 conSIIUCled barrier, or ma~rs do not "ecHSoI!lrill"
    Idf!f'lily rrut PrOPftty /lounder .... (Profe'S10"'" auet1 as app~&&era, ~rcMl/ClS. ""1YryGl5 .nd eM! enginee-... rc bHt IUlted to
    oeterrmne ~Qw ... e footolge. dlm~lJon, and bOundflries of Itt. Property.)
    :; WOOD DESTROYING PESTS: Pres~nu at, or COOClitlOrtS ~j(ely to llao to me praW1O! of WOOd deEtT'Oying pe,ts and orgenislM
    anc Oll1er mle5t~Mn or 'nfK1ion, InsPQetlOr1 reports ~ring 1l1eSt 'fems C4V'I be separ.lled Into two sedion8: Seaion 1 ioel'llifres
    a(~as wMre rnfe5UIIJOn or InteCliOfl II !'lloent. Seaior1 2 identifle' altia' Wf1"re there ,,'e conditions hkdy to leecl tel ~lion Of
    ,nfection A rel1'sJered Sll'1.JC!U r il peSI conlrel CO/'I1f)8ny 1$ be~1 $uited tD per10rm these inspecl:ions.

    Tn. ce!:lY"9ht I....' DI tn. ur.nea ~te. (Tille , 7 U.S. Colle) l'OrDoCl N
    uCHllhQrUe<: .... J:lfocUC'lQf' 01 lh~ Ie"" 01 allypomon \neree1, b'1 P"C'ltlCO\7Y Buyolrs 1"_i8lS t
    l$ )( )

    (;)
    --
    ",.cn,ne 0'."" orn.r _~~ ,nc:l""'"9 bcs",," 0' ~unnze" lo'Tnal~ Sel~N In~llIt:1 < ) ( )
    Copyncm ~ 1991·2002 C"L1~ORNIA ASSOCIATiO"l OF RElll TORSI!:.
    INC. ALL RIGHTS JleSf;RVE:J
    I P\........ e<r D) 08Ie _ _
    I
    .,1... ~t"

    BIA REVISED '0102 ("loGE 1 01" 2)


    BUYER'S INSPECTION ADVISORY tBIA PAGE 1 OF 2
    Ag.m.: N,vl. SplT'·;;n Phone: (3'0"'11'835 !Ju; (310)
    8'ok~ GillinI' i GrH'," I'l.Nlto~ 13JJ ~alWoOd 8IY'CI. . L05 .IIQ.....
    Prlpe,-.o
    CA tOO~
    Ullng ~F'arrns') coftwat't

    606 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p606/679


    __ ..
    ,./22/2."
    _.' ....... _~
    15"2
    •• ......
    ~
    tsf,
    l~I"l'\.::n;

    31 C 27' 4834;
    MARt:.
    Ea , SEP'22-Q4 3:~7Pllj
    P&U:
    PA(JE 11
    13
    ns
    ?rooe<T; I'oad'eu. ~ p~ ez..... :·W':y /lil,i" CA 90.2U 0.-: $tpt.eooQer. 2()(].

    4. SOIL STA8IUTY: u,ner'lC'- of fl. Of comP&Ctedso~ expinsIVE or r;z;rTtr3ctJt19 soil. S~llbiflty to '-'ippag•. eetll81; l)l' IrQw'erTWlflt
    .nd 'hp aceoullCY Of d,"B'nll ge (~otKhnICbl el1g'~rs lire best suited to Ol>'.rmJtle slJd'1 conOibons, causes Ind remedies)
    5. ROOF: Pleserr COn<l ,tl()rC , age. Ie.U, .r,d r~n'ng us""" lite. (ROefing con1r.ietors llre bes! $U'lec to ~rm+ne these CCYIOlhons 1
    6. POOLJSPA: C"3Cl<S. I... ~ or o~ranona) probl~ms (POOl contr3c:loro we Desl SUIted to datermW1e these COnditio",.)
    7. WA~Tf DISPOSAL: Type~i. ClOOQUacy. ~?3Clty 11M condllJon of ~r IlI'lCl sepl,e: !l~tems ino ~ connectIon 10
    5e... er and _ppllCab~ kw' .
    6. WATE R AND UT~lJTES; WElL SYSTE~S A~C COMPONENTS: Wal~ and Ulitity ;JVilJlat>ir~y, Lr.Ie re!ItT\ctJor\$ .nc costs. water
    c<uAlity aoequiley. oonOlhor, aM Denor.Tliln~ Of .... t'lIlysWms <mel comooneml
    ~ ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS; PO\>inlial en,moomemal h22&rds. ,nduo'ng, bUt ncl hmilq(: to. a!>best~ ~Id·bol~ pun Ol"d otJ'>ef

    leeo ~nUlrt'"natlor.. raOon. I"'1Qttlane. other ~a~!.. tv.1 0<' or Cf)ernlc:.81 storclge tan.,.
    CO'"\\amln3t'd 5Ol1 Of Wl!4!(, harlrOou\ W8'Jte.
    Wllsl, 0:H105(11 5ne~ eleetrome9nWlIl; l'IelCl$ nUClQar 5OUIC.. , and other ~b6\aroce.. m~niiJ$. ProdU05. Of condilJonl (1nc;:lyda'1~
    mole (OtJrtxlmli. l<')lIe or otn.rwrse) fun9lA <X $Im"ar OOmamll\int!l). (For mOll rntormabOtl on theM ~, yO\J rnay COtlSUlI lin
    ~ppOP"ale proless'on,,1! or :~d the booklets ·EnVlro",~mal ,,"a.z_r~; A GUide tor Homeawoers. BUyer:... Landortis and Te~nu:
    ''Prote-cl Your family From ~ao '" Your Mcrne' Q( boltl.)
    , O. EARTHQUAKES AND ~UXlOlNG' Sl.ISCeptJbility c:A tnt Property 10 urtt1Qv.kaI.ei1!rric hazmtb and pro~sily of ttl. Prcpany to
    flood (A C*OI<.>gi&! 0' Geo!'eCI1/l1c.1 Eng,,'lel!" Is beST sl6ted to P<OVI~ ,nlonna1;on on these cxmd.'ons.)
    11. nRc... HAZARD AND OTHE" INSU"-ANCE: Thtl 3\1awability anQ COSl of ,.,e~ry QI: o"",d
    ""Ufinol ~ lIary. The loaIhon or
    thtl Ff':lPPrty in a sel$f'l'llc flood or fire I'Ianlrc zone, and other cxrdlllOns. IVd"l al thl age oj u. Propeny and the clafms history 01
    the P:n~rTy inC Euyer. may ll'lec1 \hW W1l1111~hty O>\'ld nM<l tor cel'\alJ1 types of "'~\Jranc,. a~1 should e>epl~ ..... ~ ~
    ~lHI) ~ tni, ,n'orm"bOf1 mY!' aff~e:t other O~CJS'OT\$. 'rd.J(ling the nemcwal ot lOan ane ,nspectlon CDn1ing~OH. (An Insurance &\)en!
    is ~t auJ&ed 10 prov-de ,nlormaltOn en lhek =ndalons )
    12 BUIlDING PERMITS, ZO'-lING AND GOVERNMEl'fTAi. IItfOUIREMENTS; PermltJ, if'Q;P'ldion6. oert1ie:ates. zoning, ofl\er
    Qovernrnenlal ~rn'lalJOn!> ~tnCllOns. and re-oUl'emet\15 a!ttcLng the CUTenl QI: fulUre ~ 01 the Ploperty, its ~elc>pmerrt Of SIZE.
    (SUCh intormat'On is "v,lIlable "'am 4ipproprlll1e gov~rrvn."t"i agend~S ino prMlte InIormeMn proVlOel"!. Brolcerl arw not Qu;alffro to
    ~v,t-W or Tnlerprer Ilny sue n 'I'110l'lTl8tlOrl.)
    13. RENTAL PR-QPERiY RE6TRICTIONS: 50me 01'0& an<! covnllu 'mpo$& r~ttrlCtio!'lS lt1at limit the amount of __ \hili can be
    charoed, N me~,mum numbllr of OCCvpllnts. llncl tr'l rlQl"l of a landlord 10 lerT'l"lO"l" I If:nllncy. DeltdbOll 0' other I()CU and 8eaurity
    'V~Q~ to' OOO~ enD WlnOOWS. ""eluding WIndOW biOTS. ihouId tie b~\l"Ied to dttermil'le wt>eltler "'-Y utl,ty I~el recwiremertls.
    (Govemmt'nlll~nCJe-!oQn P<OvI~ ...,formefloo 4Jbour thete .-.stnc:tions and oltler requirenwnts.l
    1... SECURITY ANO SAFETY: St4JtE and 10081 L~ ""y r~u,", tile tn5tOl1J4ilron of barners. Il~ elMm:J. self4al<;t11ng ~nlSlTll
    !lncl/or other ~asure3 to Cec~g ~ ns~ to children and otner ~rsom c:A e:rlstlflg ~mm'ng poolS and hot tubs, liS well as IIWIOl.W
    fl~ sa~ .nc1 othPf measurps con~ming o/t>er features of tne Property. Compli3~ reQ.JI'ementS oifler from cit)' 10 cIIy Ind c:ourrty
    10 county. UnlPl:S ,peCit,cally 2Qreed, the Property rna) ;TD1 ~ 10 comphllncw with thfl~ I1l?'Owr.mentS (Local gowmmeol &geflCJeS
    can provide infOI'm;l11On about ftle:le restrictions and ott1ef f'I'l<u,,-. . m,n1s.)
    15 NEIGHBORHOOD, AI~EA, SUGOIVtSIQN CONOmONS; PERSONAl FAC7ORS: "*'9hbo~ or are. condition., indudirlg
    . ~d\OOIs pro~imdy IIno ae-quacy ot . - enforc,ement ~ sl2tr.l:JeS, Itle prounity 01 ~glStered felons or offenollr$..flre pr~,
    orner gO¥l'mmenr selVl~. ,vllllablfrty, aOllQUIIC:Y and com of ."y~. "",relbU lT1t~et ClOl'lneQ1Ol'1! l)l' etrter
    ''''.co mm vn'C8TlOn! or om.r 1~c;hnOIOgY setVlCIK lind lTls.talloationi. prOIC,rnIty ., commeroll!, 'I'ld u5tN I or "9nc:utwral. aetlYltles,
    e~lr.lIl'\O ~nd prop05'-<l l,ans.porutllon. consOUCI.OO and CleY.lopment tf\it mlY .~ OOlSll, view. or tra1Tic:. 8Irpon nocae. "OI5e or o<lcr
    from ,,;'y source. wild .me oom"51ic a..,ll'T'I!ll~ other ~isencal, haz,erds, or Clroumsblneea, prot8C\ed .spedes. _~nd propertieS,
    OO\arUcel C':lellse5. h~tonc or other govemmentilJly pro~ed Jirtes or Imcro..ements. CJe(nP1eflt'S. IeoilrlleS end c:ofldltlCln of common
    urell:l of common ,nlllfeSl :lubo:\Illlionl, 4Jno POSsib~ "ell
    at ~i.nce wttI1 .ny Ill>'llemiflQ documonts l)l' Homeo_,.' A&aoci8tion
    r~uirl'ments CO'1dillons .line InfluenCll.ls C1I 5tgnifK.MlcZ to certain Q.j1tU'e$ anl1Jor ~Itg'ons. llnC pe~aI needs, requretTle"b and
    prefe~r= of Buyer

    Buyel "'~ Selle-< "Clv1owleCl9' ~nd ~ t'l81 8ro,..,. ll) 00Qe nel ~ ~.l pna: BUYef shoulC PtIy or S.I" &llCU1d I~ (II) Deft IlCI1
    ;juarenlN I'" ccndillQM of In. "',oo.rty; /iii) Do.i not gUlnollllee lhc: PlI"!Ormll'lC1t. -O..-CV 0' ~Of"'ll'I~eness 01 in_a.cns. a.-vlces. produea or
    re(:'~ provlO1!d ()( m.de Oy S.1l~' or o~: (i\I) SIIIII nDt be '"po..... far de Mil', 1"9 Cltleett :till are nlllllnOWn 10 ~ iJ'lll I')"" no! .. ~Iy
    uL>""rvabie on ,.."onaCly ~CC2",Cie ,,,.,, O! tM Pr~: (tI) ~ W1 common area: or It) I~ crl'! I". aile oi .... Pro~.'1Y; 'v) S/laJ nOI b.
    ~oon~il>1e 10, In'PQul~ pulllr~ reeol~ 01 pe,mc cDOC:ernlllg !?Ie liUe C7 Ilft crf P'OIi>lIrtv: lvi) Snll' not De "&j;lOt1S'tlIe lor _n~ the IDcalloh of
    cound.ry "".. or orner lie ms .1Il:<:\Wl1l ~: l...i;1 SII.. rIOt be re$OO"''' lor ¥"nIyIflQ sc....-e "'ot&Qe.
    !eC1"lt_tIonI 01 olM.. Of inIormauon
    c:on~ne<l or. In.estl9.lJOn .. "ora ~ LJrlI"9 selYlc». ~rtr.I~f1Is ~ 01' otller ~omOhlltl3l material: ,viiI} S"AII not be rnt\lClfWlblll tor
    pro",~,n9 '.011 or Ia' .OYlCr fe9lrUt"\l lOY _ 0 oJ • trIlnr.aCJCn .n.r.ll 'hlO Py 6u)ier or Sekr. InC IIx) S"<IP no! be _oonllbill tor Clf'OYidln9
    Olher ;ll",ce or l'lfDtmMon lnlll eJe»eas It-.. l<nowil109l, .cu~rlon ;"ll '.r-""'oe ~u;."o 10 perlcrrn rw.&l eslJI~ IlQW'ISed ~It)'. Buyer 'nc:! SeIIet'
    .grn 10 ~ ~g.;. tu, ,nsu,.n~. ~ .nel C'C~., oealnrel aU'l1ancr !torn OljlPlOpnm prcqaionll.

    By Signing ~Io.., liiuyer 4Jnd S~Jor each K"~I ttlal ttwy hive "'ad. Underatand, ~pt and AaVll rll'(;ifved a Copy of
    this Adv~ry. BUyflW .nco~ to rwIId It ~efUlty.

    Buyer Signature CAte

    Seller Signature-" Date Seller Slgr.atu~ Date


    Jo:.epb Ze:rn.i.r.
    TH'~ ,~ ....., e.EEN A"""OV£D EY "'Ht r."1I~0A""'" A!SOClATlON 0' "lEAl TDRSe (C.A "'.J NO REPRE5ENU'T'IQIo/ 15 I.IAOi AS 10 TH' lEGAl. v.a.u01'r" OIl
    ~OfCUAC'" 0< "'"lY -OVISION N ANY SPEc,!',e l<;A'lSACTIOIIl " ilEAl. E~.. TO PloKl;Il IS 'T'H~ "lill$ON Cw.../r1[C TO 1\lNl6€ Ofj "fAL ESTAn
    r""'.N!>ACTro~ ,. yuu O[~I'\E :,f(;lll 01'1 TIU< ADV!CO C;~SUl 'T' AA APPflOPfW<,'l': PI'\('lFEs.sIOHA ..
    ,"",! 10"" ., .,,' ..btl;o, _14 ~ "" ..",~ ..., ...... inous..,.. n 15 nol ~ .. ~ I? lClentof)o tho "~r a •• IOu.<. TO~ "-u.<. TOlle IS •'1'9_ ~ ~ p INI~
    _"" "'a'I De ......, ~n,., ~ mofl'~ tl'! .... NA 'nOt<~l A:;SOCIA TlQIoI ~ IlE,O.L I~M who lub&Q1e. IU ItS c.ooo '" t1l'rQl ~

    ~
    ~
    FUOI"~Ctrytl1t!
    c..lI;~rn,,, ASSQc.-!ion oi RtAl.TOR6C!:
    ! "~.,_Cl:l)' on~ i l.5.J
    __
    1 ~ ""'~ irJi ~~-. - '-Hf9IIT1"

    B,. R.EVlS~O 101<12 <PAGE 2 0' 2)


    BLJ'r'ER':S INSI'IiCTrON .AOVlSOIt'Y (etA PAGE 2 ~ 2)

    607 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p607/679


    1£\/:212604 15: 42 • •31 ";1\",1 tt:I I
    MARtl
    4Q.34L ;
    .41 SEP·:2<-04 ~:~9P"';
    pt.,& 14
    FAGE 1211~

    ~,
    C"'llrORNIII
    ... $ SOC 1" T I () N
    WOOD DESTROYING PEST INSPECTION ANO

    ~

    Of R..r." 1 T () I\. S • ALLOCA1ION OF COST ADDENDUM
    (C.AR. Fo"" ~,., Re.... lM<l 10102)

    T~dS I~ an 3Odendu~ 10 l.... t ~ Ca!rtom.e He!>lc.ntlal P\Jrc:."1~ A~ee~t or Q Ott.er


    - rAgreemenr). cated Sec;tember if 2004
    on property known ~s 32C s. Ff'ck DrH'e, k~rly Rip., CA. 9Qil£
    (" Proper1y").
    berw~n _ ~;j ...... SaJIOoIO.an r 6uyer'")
    and _ _ _ _ _-'J:::;o"'.3"'C'PEIh f~%"%'M (·S~ler")

    THE ~OLLDWiNG SHALL R.EPI ACE THE \/\OOD DESTROYING PEST INSr'ECTION PARAGRAPH (<SA Ifl the Cal1foml2l
    Resloent,al Purch~ Agre-ernerlt IRP-"-CA)) and sl1all 5uperseoe any confllcll/"\Q ~rms ,n any p~ousty-genefated
    agreerne .... t

    WOOD D£S~OY,NG PESTS


    A, 0 3uyer [l; Seller W1all pPJy lor a Fest Control Repon: for wood d~troy'ng pelts and organrsms only ('Report').
    7tJe Report Shtll De p~Dar~c t:>~ SQll",r:l d:c. oc a regi~eo strudural pe5t
    ::;C"lt:"O! :;;(mpany who Shan 5ep.orctEl ttle F'eport mto seetJOf1S ~or eVlClenr 1I'1~~laton or Intectioo (Section 1) and fOr
    :O:"ldltlons liI'ely to lead to ,nf~!'ltCillon or Infechon (Sectlon 2]. The Report lShcill co'W'er lt1e main bUllOing 81'00 ~Ch.d
    srrl:CllJre~ ano. If chec"ed: ~ detacnea 92ra~s i!lnd carports, 0 deliletled decks, 0 the fDlklw,ng other :rt.ructures
    on the Propert>/ __
    Tne REpor. snail not IrCIUOe roof covenngs If the Property IS Ii unit Il'1 II condominium or other common Interes!
    SUt'dlVlSlon !'hE F;epc"1 shall include only ttle ~ep!lrzlte I11teresl and eny exc:lusl'Je-iJse areas ~jng transf9rTed, an<l
    sl1all no: ,nCIude common areas Waler Le5~ of !hower pam; 011 upoer '.\1411 units may not be performed unless the
    owners of property below Ihle shew., t;onsent If Buyer requests inspecbon of Inacceuib!e a~s, euy~r shall pey for
    lh~ (;Osl or entry. insptH;tion and clO$log tor tho~ 2reas, unlPU olherwise agreed A. wnttrl Pest Control CertifiCatIon
    shall be lssuec: ;:no, l() Close or
    Escrow, unless otherwtlle agreefl, only if no i"fe-£tation or tnfection Is found or If
    reQUH-ed cOflec:tJ\le work is completed.

    B. (Section 1) =:J Eiuyer ~ Seller 5hall pay for won, r~mmended \0 correct '~ion l' conditioos oescnbed in the
    Report 2nd tne cost of,nspeetion, entry ana ClOSing of tnole Inacce5aib~ ;ifeas wtlere 41ctl've rn~lation or Infection
    IS, dlSCO\lereO

    <Sf'cfion 2} [l: Buyer C Seifer ,hall p~y for ..... ork recommeflded to correct 'Section 2' condltlon$ deScribed In the
    Report jf requesleo oy l:ivyer.

    B-; signing be 10"" , tt1e undery,ign5Q acknowledge that ~Ich hIS rUd. und.~~nd. and hal A'ceive-d I copy of this
    Addendum.

    D~te
    :; -_.
    s..pCt=b.~ i,
    "
    ;D(l4 O,le S!Et~~4L.1-,2~O.::;O~4 _

    Buyer /}/(~a ~~
    ~~am.aa!l
    Seller
    Jo_.ph .z• ......,:::k
    Buy"," _ _ Seller

    T"""t,:t".(",,,O~' ~ c·-:-r.. ur,IfC5u:,",~ 1-:' 1~1...s C~,fuftW1f'T\le~'Orrt.(j~ct.". to."'ft'l Clf W'fpOl"nOl'\~ b; '~~"Of""~ "...,..•.
    n.",.lIm, ..""" •• ,r ::-'~·P.I~"''''' fprrnaa ~:>Y"ON e 2~2. C<\l1~OR!jIA "SSOC'AT\ON O~ ~i.Al,~. INC All ':UGH1'S 1'\~6eR\lEC

    1HI5 'ORM .....S 6t£N ~ ..pqCV!O llY TH[ C>'Il/'Oi'N'" ~OCiATIO" Of R£.A.l. TORse (C A II.) NO RePIllEStN"T.olTlON IS IoAADE AS"l"Q ~E lEOAI.. vAl101T'r O~
    "V

    ADEOU...cT OF ..
    1J<AN£"CTIQNS I' vOU C)f:'I~.F 1.F.CAl .'ll
    PltOVIS')" IN AN" S~tcrnc TI"',NSACT1~. " ~ EETAn. 'R.DI<E~ IS THE P£RSOtl QU"-LIFIEO 'Ttl #!l\llS1 ON ".EA.l ~TATi
    TIU .AJ)VlCE CClNSlJlT .U; "PPl'loPRJAT[ PROF1:SSIOH4l

    w"'C" m" 0<" ":>K' O'.~ ,=,' r,,,-_. '"


    n",l':"~ 1o~1 '\0 ~"'ililblr r-:. III'! Ell :tiP ..tl"tbrc r\!.1 .S...... '."tCUSV'y ):I d no' "'tl.r"ICt'Cl ~ \~ r"It ~ ~ JI RfAL TOM JtUL TOI'e .. III ~~ ~1eC1r¥'e rntfI"ee""c .".,..
    In< N.'1"ONAl ASSOCl"'"IlOloi ~ ...... l TOR£~ '""" ~"'C"Ice 10 ill Coo. '" E:rw:,

    rSt.Rf~~~.
    ~...
    Pub'~h.a by 1tle
    GRII/o,.,.,.. AS50c.'toQ~ Cj REAlrOf'l~ :=------------~,
    ~
    _. Ir.f ""11"....:; .
    ~1f'We<: ~ D~~ ::.:.=
    1.:.1
    WPA REVlSEC 10102 rPAGI1 OF 1)
    WOOD DESTROYING PEST INSPECTION AND ALLOCATION OF COST ADDENDUM fWPA PAGE 1 OF 1)
    "lIlt t>t: "'''' .. s..".itIl Pno...: (31 0/4781". Fn: (310/ ",."....a ...."11 WI,,*o""tCi ~
    nil"'"

    8'''''.. r: Gille""" & GriHir' ~.al/o,.. 13~: w... twooa tPvCl. . Loti A CA t002.

    608 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p608/679


    28US 3014676948-068
    M28

    ADJUSTABLE RATE NOTE


    (One- Year LlBOR Index (As Published In The Waf! Street Journal) - Rate Caps)

    THIS NOTE CONTAINS PROVISIONS ALLOWING FOR A CHANGE IN MY FIXED INTEREST


    RATE TO AN ADJUSTABLE INTEREST RATE AND FOR CHANGES IN MY MONTHLY
    PAYMENT. THIS NOTE LIMITS THE AMOUNT MY ADJUSTABLE INTEREST RATE CAN
    CHANGE AT ANY ONE TI ME AND THE MAXIMUM RATE I MUST PAY.
    DECEMBER 03, 2007 WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA
    [Date] lCity} [State]

    320 S PECK DRIVE, BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212


    [Property Address]
    1. BORROWER'S PROMISE TO PA Y
    In return for a loan that I have received, I promise to pay U.S. $ 1 374 400 00 (this amount is called
    "Pri nci ra1"), pi us interest, to the order of Lender. Lender is WAS H I NG~ON ~UTU~L BANK. FA

    I will make all payments under this Note in the form of cash, check or money order.
    I understand that Lender may transfer this Note. Lender or anyone who takes this Note by transfer and who is
    entitled to receive payments under this Note is called the "Note Holder."

    2. INTEREST
    Interest will be charged on unpaid principal until the full amount of Principal has been paid. I will pay interest
    at a yearly rate of 7.375 %. The interest rate I will pay may change in accordance with Section 4 of
    this \,Jote.
    The interest rate required by this Section 2 and Section 4 of this Note is the rate I will pay both before and after
    any default described in Section 7(13) of this Note.

    3. PA Y!\IENTS
    (A) Time and Place of Payments
    I will make a payment on the first day of every month, beginning on FEBRUARY 01 2008
    Before the first Principal and Interest Payment Due Date as described in Section 4 of this Note, ~y payment will
    consist only of the interest due on the unpaid principal balance of this Note. Thereafter, I will pay principal and
    interest by making a payment every month as provided below.
    I will make my monthly payments of principal and interest beginning on the First Principal and Interest
    Payment Due Date as described in Section 4 of this Note. I will make these payments every month until I have paid
    all of the principal and interest and any other charges described below that I may owe under this Note. Each monthly
    payment will be applied as of its scheduled due date, and jf the payment includes both principal and interest, it will
    be applied to interest before Principal. If, on JANUARY 01, 2038 , I still owe amounts
    under this Note, I will pay those amounts in full on that date, which is called the "Maturity Date."
    Iwillmakemymonthlypaymentsat P.O. BOX 78148, PHOENIX, AZ 85062-8148

    or at a different place if required by the Note Holder.


    (3) Amount of My Initial Monthly Payments
    My monthly payment will be in the amount of U.S. $ 8,446.83 before the Pirst Principal and
    Interest Payment Due Date, and thereafter will be in an amount sufficient to repay the principal and interest at the
    rate determined as described in Section 4 of this Note in substantially equal installments by the Maturity Date. The
    Note Iioider will notify me prior to the date of change in monthly payment.

    MULTISTATE ADJUSTABLE RATE NOTE - ONE-YEAR UBOR INDEX - Single Family


    P~9·10~5

    W170NMU (0407)
    VMP Mortgage Solutions. Ino. 1800)521-7291 I nit lals.
    -----

    609 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p609/679


    : : ~; ',j
    T~!" '\,~
    ~ '__i
    ~, A
    ~r. : 2?~ 8-- ~<: ~ :
    -J
    AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER ~

    &ok~ MICHAEL JAMES O'REILLY DBA PACIFIC


    Branch t: 0000933
    150 LINDARO STREET STE 110 Ekoker

    SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901 Con1act VICTOR PARKS


    Phone: (415) 257-2701 Ekok.

    Br fax NO.: (415) 259-0866 Ph"". ( 4 1 5) 4 4 4 - 0 4 4 8


    8lOk'"
    SUSPENDED by Fe•• " (415) 4-r9.;:2_-..:.4.;:3.;:8.;:8 ~- _

    31p ~ 4q(,. - ~J-{",


    DIANE FRAZIER
    This Is to Inform yov that your losn submission
    Loan" 817 37 3 75
    w.
    10/14/2004

    reviewed at the NrTn$ lIatAd below:


    Borre_'. N&'ne:,..::S:.:.AMAA::.:..::.:.:.;N~,......:.;N...:.I.:.V...:.I.:::E~ _

    Appl~o Lolln Arrount 1, 374, 400 .00 ~~m~~C~5/1 LIaR A~ InterestO~

    Purpose: PURCHASE, OWNER OCCUPIED, REDUCED


    Stwrt RaW: S. 50 0 swt T.",.,: 60 LTV' 80.00
    LOAN AMOUNT: 1,374,400.00

    Subjecc to the specific conditions listed below, we W~Il be able to approve


    your loan aubmis8'oo. For all submissions, pending flnal approval, no change
    10 the borrOwer(s) financial status or employment can occur, and the credlt
    documents and appra1sal must remain current.

    TO ~void having your submission closed for lncompl~tene33, any ~tems listed
    below as 'RequirQd Prior to ~pproval' must be rececved within 10 days of the
    date shown above.
    eo..dltl"....1 P _ 2 - o\pprov-', 17

    Aequl,ftd CondllJon Condition


    Prlor 10 Statue Code Condltlon DeeclCommenlll

    APPROVAL OPEN 027. BORROWER WRITTEN EXPL~NATION REGARDING


    Acceptable explAnacion why bUBines~ in 411 reVeL6e i. on 1227 So
    ~lfred, L.A.
    ~PROVAL OPEN
    138. OTHER CONDITION 1
    Corp approval req'd for this ~nhanced progrAm wi .75% added to
    fee & any condition., provlde a complete copy p~ckag~ along w,th
    all conditions in triplicate
    APPROV~ OpeN 139. OTHER CONDITION 2
    Pricing to b@ corrected to ehow .75% add to fee for this ~nhanced
    ~xe~p~1on program
    APPROVAL OPEN 141. OTH~ CONDITION 4
    Verify $3Dk on depo~ic wi e~crow w/ source verified
    APPROVAL OPEN 142. OTHER CONDITION 5
    Provide co~plet~ ~x~cut~d purchage contrac~, escrow inst~uct1ona
    will not act a~ ~ Bubstitu~~
    ~PROVAL OPEN 144. OTHER CONDITION 7
    provide 03' business licen.e or CPA leeter verifying fil@d last 2
    yr~ 1040's as self employed SAme loca~10n
    APPRoVAL OPEN 145. OTHER CONDITION 8
    WF bk B~t t681-4098380 for 7/12 thru 8/12 d~ SlaOk
    DOCUMENTS OPEN 006. APPRAISAL-ACCEPTABLE FIELD REVIEW (TO SUPPORT S__~__ )
    «««« Condition ~nformation con~1nu~~ on att~ched &dd~ndum »»»»

    ",,1 ~~:':0:J5
    Undllrwrtter'. $I cJ 10/H/200~
    Da1lI

    Branch Manage"s Slgn.otu,. Dale

    OVP's1RVP'51RSM's Signature Da1lI

    FHANIlJCONV
    • UNOERWRfTlNG OEclSIONiCONDmOO LETTlOR
    2C2llO-US I07/Co1)(d)

    '111110 I I Ii
    "23991· • ~ I • • , • •

    610 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p610/679


    z May 12, 2009

    January 30, 2008


    Minute Order, Paper Court File

    611 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p611/679


    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p612/679 612
    J..
    "' J ,
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
    DATE: 01/30/08 DEPT. WEJ
    HONORABLE TERRY B. FRIEDMAN JUDGEII
    JUDGE J. CITRON DEPUTY CLERK
    A. PUIG, CSL/CT ASST.
    TEMII
    JUDGE PRO TEM ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR
    COUNTY CLERK
    HONORABLE
    01/30/0B DEPT. WEJ 1 1 of Page
    Deputy Sheriffll
    Sheriff Reporter
    MINUTES ENTERED L. McLAY, #10765
    NONE
    8: 30 ami
    am SC087400 Plaintiff
    Counsel MOE KESHAVARZI (X)
    NIVIE SAMAAN 2 NSF chk recd/re
    VS 1 $36.50 1 &97.5 Defendant JOHN PATTON, JR. (X)
    JOSEPH ZERNIK Counsel KEITH KLEIN (X)
    RECUSAL - JUDGES ALAN GOODMAN; JOSEPH ZERNIK (X)
    J.BIDERMAN; J.CONNOR; & J.SEGAL IN PRO PER
    170.6-JUDGE R.NEIDORFjJUDGE L.C
    I
    NATUREeF
    NATUREfW PROCEEDINGS:
    DEFENDANT'S (JOSEPH ZERNIK) EX PARTE APPLICATION
    FOR THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF ALL ZERNIK'S FUNDS HELD
    BY LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTj
    Matter is called for hearing.
    Defendant's ex parte application is read, considered,
    and denied with prejudice.
    Plaintiff's counsel is to give notice.
    Plaintiff's counsel is to give notice.
    and denied with prejudice.
    Defendant's ex parte application is read, considered,
    Matter is called for hearing.
    BY LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT;
    FOR THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF ALL ZERNIK'S FUNDS HELD
    DEFENDANT'S (JOSEPH ZERNIK) EX PARTE APPLICATION
    NATUREBF PROCEEDINGS:
    170.6-JUDGE R.NEIDORFiJUDGE L.C
    - --
    ----- ---
    -- - - - -
    IN PRO PER -
    - .~--- ----
    -- ------- - ---- ---
    J.BIDERMAN; J.CONNORi & J.SEGAL
    JOSEPH ZERNIK (X) RECUSAL - JUDGES ALAN GOODMAN;
    KEITH KLEIN (X) Counsel JOSEPH ZERNI K
    JOHN PATTON, JR. (X) Defendant VS 1 $36.50 1 &97.5
    NIVIE SAMAAN 2 NSF chk recd/re
    (X) MOE KESHAVARZI Counsel
    Plaintiff 8:30 am SC087400
    Reporter Deputy Sheriff NONE
    #10765 L . McLAY,
    MINUTES ENTERED
    Page 1 of 1 DEPT. WEJ 01/30/08
    ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR JUDGE PRO TEM HONORABLE
    A. PUlG, CSL/CT ASST. COUNTY CLERK
    J. CITRON DEPUTY CLERK JUDGE TERRY B. FRIEDMAN HONORABLE
    DEPl'. WEJ 01/30/08 DATE:
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
    z May 12, 2009

    January 30, 2008


    Notice of Ruling

    613 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p613/679


    .,
    •

    •
    "

    SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP


    A Limited Liability Partnership
    A
    2 II Including Professional Corporations
    PHILLIP A. DAVIS. Cal. Bar No. 110430
    ~ II I\10E
    MOE KE.SH~A \lARZI~ Cal. Bar No. 223759
    KESHAVARZL
    ROBERT MUSSIG. Cal. Bar No. 240369
    4411333333 South Hope Street, 48th Floor
    9007] -1448
    Los Angeles. California 90071
    "" II Telephone: .:'13-62U-1780
    .213-620-]78(1
    Facsimile: 213-620-] 398
    .213-6.20-]
    (1

    ~ ':\l1tJrJit'\ '. 1,)1 l)i~II!l!ljl '\i\lc"'IJl1,J;11i

    c~

    LI q cPfRTOR COT TRT or THr::;T\ TE or C'\ UFOR\IA


    j I, HJR i HE cue \.1 '1 UJ- dJ.' A.'\lJELl:" - \\L~I Lll.\lRlc

    11

    ] 2 II NIVIE SAMAAN,
    12 SAMAAN. an individual; Case No. SC 087400

    13 Plaintiff Honorable Terrv Friedman

    14 v. NOTICE OF RULING

    ] 5 II JOSEPH ZERNJK.
    ]5 ZERNIK. an individual and
    DOES
    DOES]1 through O. inclusive.
    through]10. jncJusj~ve.
    16
    Defendants.
    17
    18

    19
    20
    21

    22
    23
    24

    25
    26
    27

    28

    -1-
    614 IIII_~~~~==;-:--
    W02·WEST
    \'i02-WEST iMMKi-100695T:
    iMMKi-100695T, ::
    ~-=--.l]-=--
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p614/679
    --:;-;-;:::=~:;-:;::::-;=~
    ?'JOTICE OF RULl0'G
    ?\iOTICE RUL8G
    )1·
    !
    ·
    I
    '

    1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:


    2
    ~ PLEASE TAKE "\lOnCE
    ~OTICE that defendant Joseph Zemik's ("Zernik") Ex
    Zernik's ("Zemik") E\. Parte

    4 II Application for an Order that the Receiver release all funds held by him came
    carne on regularly

    ,. . 'II for hearing


    hearln.!Z OJ]
    (lll Januan
    J:1J1uan 311. ~llil~
    '::fIU~ t:.'dJ a.m
    at t:.'d) Zemik appeared
    a,m, ZC'Jl1ik 1~llt
    appC'arC'G in pro per and appeared late

    fClr the heann~ 'doe Kesha\arzi


    (, Ii for \lullin. Richter &: Hampton LLP appeared
    Keslla\arzi of Sheppard \lul1in. appeal"ed

    Ill' i,t'il:t!1 ,'I,Llll1[ln"l\ It ,,:llll:l:tll ''-.:dllld::l'' k,'lth Ii kit-Ill \)fHnn (:1\,'. ~ ! Ji

    ~ i I appeared T(X
    S 'I n~n-pan: Country\\ide and counse i 1)'om
    tor n~n-pan: hom the 13\\
    1a\\ 11r111
    tlrm of Pasternak.

    li ! P:tqtTn:l~ t'1 ::!.


    P:tqtTn:l~, ,j;, :lJl!'t':lred
    :ll'l't':II"ecl fClr tlle EecC'l\
    f\l1" tI,e Rt'cel\ f1
    ET

    II j
    II:
    'i

    11
    11 Zernik's brief. Samaan's opposition and oral argument of
    After considering Zemik's

    12 II Zemik and counsel the Court.


    Court, the Honorable Teny'
    Terry Friedman presiding, ordered as follows:
    follmvs:

    13 II Zemik's Ex Pane
    Parte Application is denied with prejudice. The Court also warned Zemik
    Zernik that

    14 II if he seeks the same relief under the same facts,


    facts. he wi]]
    will be sanctioned.

    15
    1b i! Dated: Januar:,
    J anuan :'(1. 200~
    .-:,(!. 200~

    17 SHEPPARD. MULLIN, RICHTER


    SHEPPARD, ICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
    UP

    18
    -------
    19 By
    OE KESHA VARZI
    V ARZI
    20
    Attorneys for Plaintiff
    21 NIVIE SMAAN

    22
    23

    24

    25
    26
    27 I

    28
    1
    1

    -7-
    -/-
    615 II!I WO'.WES; ATTACHMENTS
    WOC"'ESC 'w,,"! '0069':C' , & EXHIBITS p615/679
    ;'yjlvlKi.100695=-: • NOTICE OF RlLlNG
    RlLING
    i:
    PROOF OF SERVICE

    2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

    "
    .) I am employed in the County of Los Angeles: I am over the age of eighteen
    years and not a party to the within entitled action; my business address is 333 South Hope
    4 II Street, 48th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071-1448 .

    .: ; II On JanuarY 30, 2008, I served the following document(s) described as


    , NOTICE OF RULING on the interested party(ies) in this action by placing true copies
    6 II thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes andJor packages addressed as follows:

    Rohert .1. Shulkin. Esq. Joseph Zemik


    The La\\ Depanment 2415 Saint George Street
    8 Coldwell Banker Residential Los Feliz. Califolnia 9002 7
    Brokerage Company ]z 12345(Ciem1hlink.net
    C) ] 1(,11 San Vicente Blvd.. Ninth Floor
    l oS:\JH!.ek~. C~\ ')()()4C)-6~ 1 (I
    IU Facsimile: i3JU) -+4--190~
    roben.shulkin(iicamoves.com
    11
    David 1. Pasternak John W. Amberg, Esq.
    12 Pasternak, Pasternak & Patton, LLP lenna Moldawsky, Esq.
    1875 Century Park East, Suite2200 Bryan Cave, LLP
    13 Los Angeles: California 90067-2523 120 Broadway, Suite 300
    Facsimile: (310) 553-1540 Santa Monica, California 90401-2386
    14 djp(Q)paslaw.com Facsimile: (310) 576-2200

    15 Sanford Shatz, Esq.


    Todd A. Boock, Esq.
    16 5220 Las Virgenes Road, MS: AC-l J
    Calabasas, California 91302
    17 Facsimile: (818) 871-4669

    18 ~ BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the finn's practice of collection and


    processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited
    19 with the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at
    Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
    20 motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or
    postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in
    21 affidavit.

    22 0 BY HAND DELIVERY: I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand to the


    office of the addressee(s).
    23
    ~ STATE: I declare under penalty ofpeIjury under the laws of the State of
    24 California that the foregoing is true and correct.

    25 Executed on January 30, 2008, at Los Angeles, California.

    26
    )~
    _/
    David Zasloff
    28

    616 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p616/679


    z May 12, 2009

    January 30, 2008 Transcript

    617 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p617/679


    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 58-7 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 41 of 50

    1 MR. KLEIN: COUNTRYWIDE'S ONLY POSITION, YOUR


    2 HONOR, IS THAT WE KEEP GETTING NOTICED WITH
    3 EX PARTES, OFTENTIMES THEY'RE REFERRING TO THIS
    4 ONGOING DISCOVERY DISPUTE THAT DR. ZERNIK APPARENTLY
    5 CONTINUES TO HAVE WITH COUNTRYWIDE, AND WE'RE HERE
    6 EVERY TIME. IT'S GETTING QUITE OLD AND EXPENSIVE.
    7 SO WE ENDORSE TO SOME DEGREE T~E POSITION STATED BY
    8 SHEPPARD MULLIN.
    9 THE COURT: MR. ZERNIK HAVE YOU PAID FILING

    10 FEES?
    11 MR. ZERNIK: YES.
    12 MAY I ANSWER FOR THE RECORD?
    13 THE COURT: YOU MAY IF YOU WISH ME TO REVIEW
    14 THE PAPERS. YOU SHOULD PROVIDE THEM TO THE COURT
    15 ASSISTANT.
    16 MR. ZERNIK: MAY I ANSWER TO THE CLAIMS MADE
    17 BY OTHER PARTIES FOR THE RECORD?
    18 THE COURT: YOU MAY.
    19 MR. ZERNIK: FIRST OF ALL, REGARDING ATTORNEY
    20 KESHAVARZI'S CLAIM THAT I MAKE MOCKERY OUT OF THE
    21 COURT SYSTEM. I SCGGEST THAT AFTER READING MY
    22 APPLICATION TODAY, YOU DETERMINE WHO IS MAKING
    23 MOCKERY OUT OF THE COURT SYSTEM AND THE JUSTICE
    24 SYSTEM. THAT'S FIRST.
    25 SECOND ISSUE IS WITH COUNTRYWIDE, THAT
    26 RIDICULOUS, REPEATED CLAIM THAT I'M ENGAGING IN
    27 DISCOVERY IS JUST TOO OLD TO BE HEARD ANYMORE. THE
    28 LAST I SENT TO THEM IS A NOTICE THAT MR. MOZILO

    ~" . . ~.~~ \'" I....... Tn

    PAGE 638

    618 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p618/679


    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 58-7 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 37 of 50

    1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    2 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

    4 DEPARTMENT WE IIJII HON. TERRY B. FRIEDMAN, JUDGE

    6 NIVIE SAMMAN,
    7 PLAINTIFF,

    8 VS. NO. SC087400

    9 JOSEPH ZERNIK,
    10 DEFENDANT.

    11

    12
    13
    TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
    14
    JANUARY 30, 2008
    15
    16
    17 APPEARANCES:
    18 FOR THE PLAINTIFF: MOE KESHAVARZI, ESQ.

    19
    FOR THE DEFENDANT: JOSEPH ZERNIK,
    20 IN PRO PER

    21
    FOR THE NON-PARTY KEITH KLEIN, ESQ.
    22 COUNTRYWIDE:
    23
    FOR THE RECEIVER: JOHN PATTON, JR., ESQ.
    24
    25
    26
    27
    ...!"i\·

    28 LISA MCLAY, CSR #10765


    OFFICIAL REPORTER

    PAGE 634

    619 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p619/679


    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 58-7 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 38 of 50

    1 SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA; WED., JANUARY 30, 2008


    2 A.M. SESSION
    3 DEPARTMENT WE "J" HON. TERRY B. FRIEDMAN, JUDGE
    4 (APPEARANCES AS HERETOFORE NOTED.)
    5 (LISA MCLAY, CSR #10765)

    6
    7 THE COURT: EX PARTE, SAMA~N VERSUS ZERNIK.
    8 ALL RIGHT. YESTERDAY IN THIS MATTER THE
    9 DEFENDANT, MR. ZERNIK, FILED AN EX PARTE APPLICATION
    10 WHICH I DENIED BECAUSE THERE IS NO NOTICE TO THE
    11 RECEIVER. I SEE ALL THE PARTIES PRESENT THIS
    12 MORNING, ALTHOUGH, THERE IS NO NEW EX PARTE
    13 APPLICATION BEFORE THE COURT.
    14 MAY I HAVE YOUR APPEARANCES, PLEASE.
    15 MR. ZERNIK: JOSEPH ZERN:K, DEFENDANT, IN PRO
    16 PER. AND I HAVE THE APPL:CATION HERE.
    17 MR. KLEIN: KEITH KLEIN ON BEHALF OF
    18 NON-PARTY, COUNTRYWIDE HOMEOWNERS.
    19 MR. PATTON: JOHN PATTON REPRESENTING THE
    20 RECEIVER, WITH SOME ISSUES ABOUT THE NOTICE, BUT WE

    21 TAKE NO POSITION ON
    22 MR. KESHAVARZI: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR, MOE
    23 KESHAVARZI FOR THE PLAINTIFF, NIVIE SAMAAN.
    24 THE COURT: WELL, MY FIRST QUESTION IS WHETHER
    25 THERE IS ANY MATTER PROPERLY PUT BEFORE THE COURT.
    26 MR. ZERNIK: I HAVE AN EX PARTE APPLICATION

    27 FOR THE COU~T TO REVIEW.


    28 THE COURT: MR. ZERNIK, EX PARTE APPLICATIONS

    PAGE 635

    620 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p620/679


    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 58-7 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 39 of 50

    1 ARE TO BE FILED IN THE DEPARTMENT BY 8:30 A.M. YOU


    2 ARRIVED AT 9:05 A.M.
    3 MR. ZERNIK: I APOLOGIZE FOR THE DELAY, YOUR

    4 HONOR.
    S MR. KESHAVARZI: MAY I ADDRESS THE COURT ON

    6 THIS ISSUE?
    7 THE COURT: YES.
    8 MR. KESHAVARZI: YOUR HONOR, SINCE AUGUST 9,
    9 WHEN THERE WAS A JUDGMENT ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE
    10 PLAINTIFF, MR. ZERNIK HAS NOTICED OVER 82 EX PARTE
    11 APPLICATIONS. I WAS DOING THE MATH IN MY HEAD THIS
    12 MORNING DRIVING OVER HERE, AND THAT'S ALMOST ONE
    13 EX PARTE EVERY TWO AND A HALF DAYS, AND IF YOU COUNT
    14 COURT HOLIDAYS AND VACATION DAYS AND OTHER HOLIDAYS,

    15 IT'S MORE.
    16 SINCE THE CASE WAS ASSIGNED TO YOUR
    17 HONOR, HE'S NOTICED EX PARTES HERE AND SHOWED UP
    18 LATE FOR EVERY SINGLE ONE, AND THERE'S BEEN THREE
    19 TIMES THAT HE HASN'T SHOWN UP. EVERY TIME THAT I
    20 COME DOWN HERE, BRYAN CAVE COMES DOWN HERE, THE
    21 RECEIVER COMES DOWN HERE, THERE IS A COS7 TO SOMEONE
    22 OF SEVERAL HUNDRED DOLLARS, AND THIS APPEARANCE FOR
    23 ME -- FOR MY CLIENTS COSTS MORE BECAUSE I HAD TO
    24 PREPARE AN OPPOSITION.
    25 MR. ZERNIK IS MAKING A MOCKERY OF THE
    26 EX PARTE SYSTEM. EX PARTES ARE RESERVED FOR
    27 EMERGENCIES. EVERY OTHER DAY WE GET A CALL OR AN
    28 E-MAIL THAT THERE IS AN EX PARTE. EVERYONE GETS

    PAGE 636

    621 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p621/679


    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 58-7 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 40 of 50

    1 HERE AT 8:30 EXCEPT FOR MR. ZERNIK, WHO SHOWS UP AT


    2 9:00, 9:30, OR DOESN'T SHOW UP, AND NOTICES ANOTHER
    3 ONE FOR THE NEXT DAY.
    4 IN THE INTEREST OF MY CLIENTS NOT HAVING
    5 TO INCUR ANY MORE FEES ON THIS SPECIFIC ISSUE, I AM
    6 WILLING TO PROCEED ON THIS EX PARTE -- WE BROUGHT AN

    7 OPPOSITION AS LONG AS BRYAN CAVE AND THE RECEIVER

    8 ARE OKAY WITH IT, BECAUSE I JUST WANT A RESOLUTION


    9 OF THIS ISSUE. BECAUSE I THINK IT'S MERITLESS, AND
    10 I'D RATHER NOT HAVE MY CLIENT SPEND A COUPLE HUNDRED
    11 DOLLARS FOR ME TO COME OUT HERE TOMORROW TO DEAL
    12 WITH AN EX PARTE APPLICATION.

    13 THE COURT: LET ME HEAR FROM THE OTHER PARTIES


    14 CONCERNING OBJECTIONS TO THE COURT PROCEEDING.

    15 MR. PATTON: THE ONLY CONCERN THAT THE


    16 RECEIVER WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS TO THE COURT, BECAUSE
    17 WE ACTUALLY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT WAS BEING REQUESTED,
    18 THE NO?ICE DIDN'T QUITE TELL US. THE RECEIVER
    19 SIMPLY WOULD REQUEST THAT THE COURT BEAR IN MIND
    20 THAT THE RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE SHOULD NEVER BE LEFT
    21 WITH LESS THAN $100,000 IN IT IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH
    22 WHAT THE RECEIVER WOULD NEED TO ACCOMPLISH TO
    23 SATISFY THE COURT'S ORDER.
    24 OTHER THAN THAT, IT CERTAINLY MAKES
    25 SENSE TO ME THAT IF WE'RE EXPECTING TO BE HERE
    26 TO~ORROW, THIS MAY HAPPEN ALL OVER AGAIN. MAYBE
    27 THIS IS THE TIME TO DRAW A LINE IN THE SAND AND SEE
    28 WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN TODAY.

    __ .. _ . - .,,... ....... III Tn A

    ....,'\,. II"" U V "

    PAGE 637

    622 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p622/679


    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 58-7 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 42 of 50

    1 (PHONETIC) POSTED ON THE WEB THAT HE'S LECTURING ON


    2 PERSONAL AND CORPORATE ETHICS AND CALLING FOR
    3 ANYBODY WHO KNOWS ABOUT FRAUD AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
    4 OR FRAUD IN COUNTRYWIDE TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY HIM.
    5 SIMILARLY, WE ALL KNOW THAT THERE IS ON
    6 THE WEB -- OR WAS A WEBSITE OF -- THAT YOUR HONOR
    7 WAS ALSO AFFILIATED WITH THAT ORGANIZATION AND ALSO
    8 THE RECEIVER, POSTERNAT (PHONETIC), WAS ALSO
    9 AFFILIATED WITH THAT ORGANIZATION, WHICH IN ENGLISH
    10 IS TRANSLATED INTO "HOUSE OF JUSTICE."
    11 AND CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL OF COUNTRYWIDE
    12 POSTED ON THE WEB PAGES OF THE ORGANIZATION A CALL
    13 FOR FRAUD BUSTING, "IF YOU HAVE FRAUD, WHO YOU GOING
    14 TO CALL? CALL ME. IF YOU HAVE REAL ESTATE FRAUD,
    15 WHO YOU GOING TO CALL? CALL ME." AND, THEREFORE, I
    16 CALLED HIM. AND NOW THEY'RE CLAIMING THAT IT'S ALL

    17 PART OF DISCOVERY PROCESS. IT'S RIDICULOUS.

    18 TWO DAYS AFTER I FIRST CALLED HIM THE


    19 WEBSITE DISAPPEARED FROM THE WEB. LUCKILY ENOUGH
    20 I'M METICULOUS ENOUGH AND I PRINTED OUT COPIES, SO I
    21 HAVE FOR RECORD KEEPING COPIES OF THOSE WEB PAGES
    22 WHERE MR. SANDOR SAMUELS, CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL OF
    23 COUNTRYWIDE, IS ASKING ANYBODY THAT KNOWS ABOUT
    24 FRAUD AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT OR FRAUD AGAINST
    25 HIMSELF TO CAL~ HIM.
    26 AND I ALSO HAVE COPIES OF THE WEBSITE,
    27 WHICH IS STILL ON, I BELIEVE, WHERE MR. MOZILO IS
    28 CALLING FOR ANYBODY WHO KNOWS ABOUT FRAUD TO CALL

    -, ... _.-
    1;;;""1 11;;>1. '"'
    ,.~ ........
    111-
    ~ .....
    PAGE 639

    623 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p623/679


    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 58-7 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 43 of 50

    1 THAT ORDER SHOuLD BE STAYED IN THE TRIAL COURT. HE


    2 CAN DEAL WITH HIS CHALLENGES IN THE APPELLATE
    3 COURT. I JUST WANTED THAT TO BE ON THE RECORD.
    4 MR. ZERNIK: YOU RAISED THAT ARGUMENT BEFORE,
    5 IN THE HEARING OF OCTOBER 11 WITH JUDGE JOHN SEGAL.
    6 UNFORTUNATELY, THAT PORTION OF THE HEARING WAS
    7 DELETED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT, BUT I REMEMBER IT
    8 VIVIDLY. BECAUSE
    9 THE COURT: DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER IT WAS
    10 RAISED BEFORE AND
    11 MR. ZERNIK: NO. I'M JUST ANSWERING TO THE
    12 ISSUE
    13 THE COURT: I'M SPEAKING NOW, MR. ZERNIK.
    14 IF YOU WISH TO FILE -- IF THERE IS ANY
    15 FUTJRE EX PARTE APPLICATION IN RESPONSE TO THAT, IF
    16 YOU WANT TO FILE PAPERS THAT ESTABLISH THP. BASIS FOR
    17 THAT, I WILL CONSIDER IT.
    18 MR. KESHAVARZI: I JUST WANTED YOUR HONOR TO

    19 BE AWARE OF THAT.
    20 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
    21 THE HEARING IS CONCLUDED.
    22 MR. KESHAVARZI: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
    23 MR. PATTON: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
    24 MR. KLEIN: THANK YOU.
    25

    26 (THE PROCEEDINGS WERE CONCLUDED.)

    27

    28

    PAGE 640

    624 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p624/679


    z May 12, 2009

    January 30, 2008 Minute Order


    Electronic Court File

    625 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p625/679


    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

    DATE: 01/30/08 DEPT. WEJ

    HONORABLE TERRY B. FRIEDMAN JUDGE J. CITRON DEPUTY CLERK


    COUNTY CLERK A. PUIG, CSL/CT ASST.
    00/00/00
    HONORABLE JUDGE PRO TEM
    DEPT. 1 1 of Page ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR
    MINUTES ENTERED]
    NONE Deputy Sheriff L. McLAY, #10765 Reporter

    8:30 am SC087400 Plaintiff


    Counsel MOE KESHA_VARZI (X)
    NIVIE SAMAAN 2 NSF chk recd/re
    VS 1 $36.50 1 &97.5 Defendant JOHN PATTON, JR. (X)
    JOSEPH ZERNIK Counsel KEITH KLEIN (X)
    RECUSAL - JUDGES ALAN GOODMAN; JOSEPH ZERNIK (X)
    J.BIDERMAN; J.CONNOR; & J.SEGAL IN PRO PER
    170.6-JUDGE R.NEIDORF;JUDGE L.C
    NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

    DEFENDANT'S (JOSEPH ZERNIK) EX PARTE APPLICATION


    FOR THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF ALL ZERNIK'S FUNDS HELD
    BY LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT;

    Matter is called for hearing.


    Defendant's ex parte application is read, considered,
    and denied with prejudice.
    Plaintiff's counsel is to give notice.
    Plaintiff's counsel is to give notice.
    and denied with prejudice.

    Defendant's ex parte application is read, considered,

    Matter is called for hearing.

    BY LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT;

    FOR THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF ALL ZERNIK'S FUNDS HELD

    DEFENDANT'S (JOSEPH ZERNIK) EX PARTE APPLICATION

    NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

    170.6-JUDGE R.NEIDORF;JUDGE L.C


    IN PRO PER J.BIDERMAN; J.CONNOR; & J.SEGAL
    JOSEPH ZERNIK (X) RECUSAL - JUDGES ALAN GOODMAN;
    KEITH KLEIN (X) Counsel JOSEPH ZERNIK
    JOHN PATTON, JR. (X) Defendant VS 1 $36.50 1 &97.5
    NIVIE SAMAAN 2 NSF chk recd/re
    (X) MOE KESHlWARZI Counsel
    Plaintiff 8:30 amlSC087400
    #10765 L. McLAY, NONE
    ENTERED~
    Reporter Deputy Sheriffll
    MINUTES
    ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR Page 1 of 1 DEPT.
    JUDG E PRO TEM 00/00/00 HONORABLE
    A. PUIG, CSL/CT ASST. COUNTY CLERK
    J. CITRON DEPUTY CLERK JUDGE TERRY B. FRIEDMAN HONORABLE

    DEPT. WEJ 01/30/08 DATE:

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

    626 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p626/679


    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    As discussed above in 4,O, California Code prescribes that
    13 a court that engaged in the sale of any property must
    14 distribute the proceeds within 30 days.
    The enclosed report demonstrates that Att Pasternak and the
    15
    Los Angeles Superior Court are still holding over $360,000
    16 from the purported sale, after they embezzled most of the
    proceeds over the past 1.5 years.
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    EXHIBIT 4,p
    28

    INTERESTED PARTY JOSEPH H ZERNIK’S MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL/RECONSIDERATION/SETTING ASIDE


    Case No. BC351286
    627 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p627/679
    'AVI
    FOR THE MONTH OF MAY, 2009 Rl::CEIVE1;:' S NINETEENT!' INTERIM
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p628/679 628
    EEF'IJR;~
    6ACZ J O H I N C T { 3 H J U O J . : U r : ) , : 1 3 .IJd I U l S I N l lJ.,NllI:lNIhl :;',):13,,\ISlttU
    &PATION
    -.)-: '' -i NOt] vd ?
    . J . i, ) : , : -
    ::
    .l:,li:,j
    ~l':).;::cc ~:eI"~m Pepcr~_
    PASTERNAK
    1 YVNI 3ISV J
    PASTERNAK
    I
    Reports\Recelver'S Rec0'i'~'er's GOl '\~':3.~J5
    s '| : a n r a r i : ! u \ \ s l : o d a ! : s , j r a . ^ . t , t r ; ,,E,I 0 0 i . r ! , 1 - i ' ,i - \ M
    w YVNU]lSVd
    [Paraq r a ph 3. g. of the Receivership
    drqs:en rof aU eL{l Jo '6'g q d r : : f r e : re 6 ] :"1ara Escrow Co."
    ' o l ) A O r c s E e J r i ? h l: } E ' ( 2~111 "ESC::'Oi""I" )Olt
    ,, , , , , " r , osJ;::iq_,:, t z
    eqf)
    (the 1-34500-GH
    HD-00gtt-T
    through the r ee c t i va t ed Escrow No.
    ' o N M O . f c s ; jp[ i ] t e A r J c r ? o J e v l .-46nc.rq1 27 II [;'lain':i.ff]
    [ J ] l : _ r r r , ,1 , : i l t z
    cl {l:ado:d
    Property to [Receivership]
    I c J r q s ; - r e ) ia\ 'J: o U ]
    2611necessary steps to sell the
    o L {: T T o s o : } r , ; d at s z { . r E , s , : ; ( : , , ; :l)ri )zu
    aliE,f ol,,
    "to take all /
    of the Re ce i.ve rs h .. p Order],
    eqf . [P,.ndc;i'raph;.. b. ~·
    2 ~>
    ITe [ " r a p : . 6 1 : l ' :q s . z e r r . - r o : ) e , E JO "e : r _ 1 d r a . r . 3r .r :, r1;_ : liz
    ( , , . , { 1 : , s d o - : 6d r q s : a n r a J e U , i l
    (the '''Receivership Pr oper t y ") California 90212 HiLs, ,lg
    e r L {)- . 1, Z I Z 0 6 E T ' : l . r o J I T E ? l, s ; ' T 1 H , 4 , 1 . : : : , : , r , rlrz
    2~L IIBE~'l::;:dy'
    'art'r:6
    2311possession of the real property located at 320 South Peck Drive,
    lifad L { l n o S O Z € f r ? p € ) l € ' : ) , : . ) -,l{ 1 : e c J o : d T p a . r o r _ l : 1J.r : r l j o - r s ' r s i j s tosdi ti z
    aXpl ol - r a n r a o e U a q : ] p € r l 3 o . ;rlp
    The Receivership Order directed the Receiver to take
    faptC) drqs;Dnra::)ed eLiJ . l ' r , b: o S
    2 '~"> Seqal.
    ilz
    ' V u r - { 0 1 .a b p n f
    2007 by Los Angeles SJperior Court Judge John A. 2111November 9,
    l.rno3 f o r - 1 e , , : : [ r Ssi a T e l i L r V ' r s o 1 , { q L ( . ' , t g 7, 6 _ r € , r l u ] , r r ' o N1tz
    uo falfeu
    Pasternak was appoi ted Receiver in this matter on
    s - ! L { l u T - f e n T o ) e E F , e:,l - rr -o, d d p f ; E , , i v{ e. u ] D l : ; E ( : l
    David J.
    ' t : ' I - )r r \ E ' ( l 20
    0z
    :6002: ',,i.r:,'h
    2009: l Report for the month of May, 1911In~erim
    J o q : ] u c u o q f , - r , l J 1 r r ; d e ' g u l r - r , . ,: ,U I 6T
    qJuaefaurN s-!q strruqns
    Pasternak hereby submits his Nineteenth r { c 1 a : , : : r ll p- ;u - f e : } s r € d ' I ) Receiver David J.
    pr.r,eO .fi}nrai)€ll 1U
    tl r
    17
    L1
    J 'fiaIErCI
    . DlI!:P~[, 's:luEprle.JOC
    De fe nda n t s . 115
    8:45 A.M. f T'IMJ!: : 9T
    'n'v 9?:8 :EInr[
    JUNE 22, 2009 D"j~T]!::
    6002 'zz gNfrf :Elfitro in21usive, 'e," r !;n ;.)L::r
    I $T
    1 .)
    1"
    'O
    and DOES 1 through 10,
    2()0!~
    I q J : , n o - r l { : }I S g O C 1 ) L i : ?
    COSEPH ZERNIK, an individual 1~&
    RJI!:P()RT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY, €;0Clu
    '.f,\r.I ,ErcH&Nor{ aEf uo-{ [lrodlErx r E ? n p r r \ r p u - i r J : e ' 1 , 1 1N t l g , , t :I l i l : l l l l o: . Ir T
    RJI!:C]!:IVl!:R' S NINETEENTH INTERIM
    NTIIS&NI H.INSSTSNIN S.II:TAITICETU 'sr\
    VS. 13
    T;T
    J -r t-r I r-Tll-T.-f
    FRIED~:AN TE:RRY BON. Plaintiff, 1 ~"
    NE'iIqgIET TEII:I.I'NOTI : l J I - - * L r L , - _ C l iil
    ')
    SC 087 400 NO. C"j~]!: '1enp rnrpur
    an individual, IilIE SJ\M.A.AN, ~; 1JL
    00? t80 cs 'oN Elsiturc u r ; , ' l q y y 7 { l ; / Si l l , r \ l ) , 1 '1rT
    10
    OT
    COUNTY QF' :[,()S ANGEI,:e:S, WEST DISTRIC'1' 9
    ,f,clu,trslq &sgtl 'sir:rgeNu soT .i1(]trfNnc,c tt
    OF CALIFORN'IA STI.~TE SUPE:lRIOR COURT OF THE U
    VI$ftIO.IITEC .IO gf,lgftir ttH,tr .IO fttfIOC Uolttiddln$l B
    7
    l^
    s
    s)
    .)
    I"
    !;
    ~& II E>JVIai 1. : d j p@paslaw. cern
    t u t ) 3 ' r ' / \ l ? I S E < : t $ t 1 L - p : T T I r h i - ' " : l ll
    Facsimile: 310.553.1540 '(:)T : oTru'r':;i:ru'.{
    ~~ II 'I'eLe.phone :
    0 t9T'EE:;
    310. ':,53.1500 a
    OllgT'trEi' 0Ta : e u c r 1 < i [ ' . ; ' 1 ott. 1 ,
    los Angeles, California 90067-2523 's€
    i aZ. S Z - L g O C ' 6 r ? T u r ( ) JI T I , T J
    2111875 Century Par~ East, Suite 2200 1 ' a b t t i r 's o ' l
    t":)oz'a e J - r r r s ' l s p : l . > f r : r d , r i : r 1 u e 3 ! ; i t l T ia
    Recei.ve r
    ..Ie,\ I ,:;r,:'O
    d
    / 1 e , u : r e 1 s e 6' f
    lllCavld J. Pasternak, Bar No. 72201 p r ^ . r ; r JT
    IAVZL "c)N.rpg
    'AlT
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p629/679 629
    2009 FOR THE MONTH OF M}\Y, Nlt-;ETEENT.'1 INT:::RI!'l REPORT REC:EI'1ER'~;
    6002 -lO HINOI 3HI U O - { J U ( l d i r l U l , ^ I I U G J N I ]I :J , l \ 1 1 : I I 3 N I l . 1S i, U 1 1 , I : : 1 : ) g i l
    :,)t'4
    #19.dcl: :~~e:·1X ~ep:)rt j ' : . : r . . : j:
    .fi :.:: f;--
    z;
    ~")
    srfallr.a)ed\st:ocieg s,;aA:a)at:l\':13ij,,ql,l:,1_\:14
    Re!)orts\Re(:elver's :)~\Recei.ve:'s ~:\~.23S·
    l]
    4,,-,,- r---^J,,,.-- - -,,A-..-,^ '((UPlIl
    -fAplO OULLILU.l /\-,rs.{vLrLrr.,+ s
    Zernik sought a temporary restraining order
    4r>or
    2 8 II (: V Cf:: .- • ~ 5 ~:j 0 Gt\ F (ma n) ) .
    -r...lvrL,.J> 4 LuJi)1,;' ).:l\': 0!;E:-:il . l , 1. . 1 84
    (Uni ted Sta.tes District Court Case No.
    'oN aseJ 27 Iii c. i.viI r i qhts v i.o La t i on s
    lfrlo3 l3-!flsl0 safE,fs paf,ru:n) 1i;;uorieTorAsl..{br.J ll:rr'::) L 4
    snorf P.l\ 6urlie11e
    and others alleging various s - fe q : . ( ) p u e 'sabpnp
    Ar.qe I es SUfierior Court Judges, LO~l 26111
    l f r l ( ) J f c ) T J e ( i . : n , :sl, 3 T i i ; ' br 1 r ! , t cI 94
    1
    T^ l-drrrnlr D /t:>nr---\r -rra rorrrrrl.n r'- 1
    - -rOnT03AU Aqt j ' {T U f € , 2
    a number of 251 C01Jr·t cornp Laint. filed by Z'2rnik a qa Ln s t; the Receiver,
    ,. f\ ri -.t. { tpr :o- .I - - - L = L .] rur 'l--- E
    JSUrE!)P ' T . l{ . u' ,(. :. .i : - , f . - t r r C ; . ) 9Z
    the Receiver was served with a federal March 2008, Duri~g 24
    TPJApa;t P q:]TA pen]es s e A - r c , / r r a ) a u e , Q J " B O O z :L { 3 " r e L {b J r : r r L i : [ vz
    'L002 'LI Joquacoll
    Esc r ow the r e af t e r closed on De c ember 17, 2007.
    uo pasoT) . f o J J :e o - r i : , 1 { :rl 4 i : ) - r 3 s r : [
    23 II
    ez
    ':rapuaT P pu1? '.{ur:clro:l a{1Jl
    2211the escrow company, the title company, and a lender. ,}q l ' z { t t p , j . u t , : >v: l, o J t :j'r€ } : : i u- zz
    and re s t r ai n i.nq Zerni k f r orn direct communicat ions with 21 III E: SCT01~',
    t{lTl sLror leJrunuruos J:)alTp u J o fJ ) i r u f a z i : u ' r u r e l l r : a ; r p , l J P ' , r r c r); st l : [ T Z
    201lthe Receiver to enter into an indemnity agreement with Mara
    e-1et{ qlT/4 f uauea.f 6r, .,{lruu-ri,rpu'l ue oJrJ"[ .ra:].ua c,J r o.,\ri)::);Ju ilq ] oz
    'liurploqHllrur xel
    19111 connection w i t n the escrow to avoid tax withholding, authorizing
    butzrroq:Inp p - . o: A E r o l Ao.r)se a L { : } r -J r ^ \ u o - l r- fi - r € rtuJ C ' : ) 6 T
    xeJ
    1811authorizing the Receiver to sign certain tax documentation in
    ur uoTJPluounsop uTPl-ra:) utirs c ,J . r i D A ' r e : ) a l l i : , 1 { : l E t u r " i t ri o t l } n : : l 8 T
    1711approving escrow documentation signed by the Receiver,
    '.f or\reoaU eql ,{q per.:llrs uorleJuilr.un3op m c , .:f: ) sai 6 u r r , o . l : I d ' ' , t L I I
    issuing an order 161 granted the Receiver's ex parte application,
    .rap-ro ue 6urnssr 'uor lecllclcle ; , J J fp d x i 3 s | - f€ ) A - : e : : ' e i al r l l F ) = ) : , : l I ? J .9
    : :T
    )
    puP p:rea'q surTTo3
    Judge Patricia Collins heard and Pr.)'tf led i)6pnr '
    In early Jecember 2007, 1:5
    9iT
    1 . 0 0 , 7 .. f a q u l e o o ( : , 1 i l- rp o u l .
    ' -I
    ,!tOJC€lO OI tlC) : t P : l - L I O U I I ' J C )i . )
    escrow. ~o 1411cocJmentation
    ',7
    puP paLI6rls -reJj:eo]aq,I
    1311to pass and thereafter signed and submitted all appropriate
    alp-r:.rdoldde TTe pa:. lruqnsi F ) u e s s ; E ? d ci ) : f €:T
    r-IT pal,lr3Dds sAep ssaursn,:l i)ii-lql aL{:l :IOI
    1211for the three business days specified in the receivership order
    -faplo d-:qs:ar\re3e-f eqf ztT
    palTeA aL{f /mol:rsa
    11 II submitted various signed documents to escrow, the Receiver waited
    - fe A T a 3 a ) l ol t;Juoun3op TT
    l f D u b T s ; s n : ) r : I t ; ' . n .p i : } J - } l . L u q n : l
    potltfo.Iur s ;e A JIeATOcoU aL{1 -le:+J\f
    1011
    pl?i.i )iTuJeZ
    After the Receiver was informed that Zernik had not
    :Iou :leVf c)T
    'A1-radorci eqf
    911earLier that day that Zernik had vacated the property.
    palEOEr,\ per{ >irur,3:;Z f,eiif ^ E ? p : 1€ L i - } ; i ) r , l . i E i , : ) €;
    drqs;:e.r\-receu uorst;osr lso:l
    Bllrossession of the Receivership Property after having learned
    pau-rr?aT 6rrrneq -retrJEr i{1:eclri:6 or{:f Jo EI
    the Receiver took
    >toof lanrasau i)qf 'Looz
    2007, ''lz faqula^ON
    On November 21" uo '.:talJl?tu sl:q:l
    7 IIFeceiver 1n this matter. L I r . . 1 : a l \ r i i r ) o { L,
    ueSaq fol.JPOJer{:f ',II
    se 6uta:as
    thereafter began serving as the .i.mme d Le t eLy and ~:()(n, l5 II J. 3,
    eql . , { 1 i l1 e t t r > a r . l r u r rI:l r . t E r 9)
    "!-(.)0?a .)
    .laquenoN uo t{leo sTq paTTJ
    The Receiver posted his bond and filed his oath on November pu[] pu)q sTq pDtrsod Jo.^r;]:)ad or{,1 g;
    I-
    '. r ' ^ h - ' ^
    cJ . r' r .r q, - s' r -. r o A T i i ) ) o ) l
    the Receivershlp Order] . i 3 L : [ : ] lt jS
    Llap-ro
    'q'I
    submits them to Zernik for signature [Paragraph 3.h. of
    L{dPJbP.red] e-rrileubrs; -roJ IruleZ ol ueql s l - l t u o n s - I e ' F I O : J t:
    311~older
    Jo
    u r L { t r ' t / ' 1o t i c ) p o l
    211if he fails to do so within three business days after the escrow
    / " 1 OCf S e A L { 1 - r A l J e sAep ssauTsnc{ aafL{f s T T r : ? f i : r r - il .' ! ?i
    and to sign escrow documerts for Defendant Joseph Zernik
    Iru.reZ qcJaso; fuepuoJoC foJ sl.-leutncoplv.of)sa u6Ts ol pue lllCrder],
    ' [ : 1 i : ) F ]: :) 1!
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p630/679 630
    6CCZ'A\1}I
    2009 !O HTNON3HI g O J J , U O : I I ] E' { I U 3 J I { I
    -·-.----R·i::cE::[\;'2E~Tl~INETEENi1J-INTERIMRE:I;~:)RT FOF THE MONTH OF 11AY,
    ii.t,N33JtNIftr S , U-JlJ,UJ:td____ -___
    rcm I'ep::r: #lJ.doc ire I
    . : : c t '- () I # ll:dari l . l l : l l : i r r .I
    W:\"7
    s,ririreli:)d\siffoCeU
    Rep c r ts vRec e i ver t s FE'Ct==i\/e:~'s =IJ'::~ 3:i
    s , : : a , ^ , T € r . t i ;ljl,l a : , ' ; i :li.i \ i M
    3
    2B
    8E
    27
    tz
    I;3.l..,fcou
    Receiver
    David J. Pasternak 245
    >{euJalsr?d'_l I)rAr?c 9)V
    't
    2009 't"I
    June 17,
    oLInl iClll,Ihil
    n
    10 6002
    \IV .\, \l
    r }\'I'E: [):
    'li'dV 2 .)
    1-
    ''
    {.1i,r- t;' {\f'n,,'
    \
    " :"J~ I~\ i: sie
    r / ti ll , ;'
    '
    \
    l " l t I

    \ ~l
    . .. \ 2,11
    \ ' - ' ' r .
    \ ",\ l,Z
    _,
    23
    E:Z
    'uoTleu.f rJuoS a]r?Js;o
    22 Ilreceivership estate subject to future Court confirmation.
    l - f r I , fJ e-fn l.nJ ol J3i3 [,qns d|qs l : o l r t - i : r : ) €;:r ziz
    aql
    the Receiver is paying that bill from the
    uo.f J TTTq leql L r r r. lz { p d Sl . r i 3 . a T e O € ) Ue L {I
    ma~ter,
    'JaJ::-pul !;'rLl
    }
    211lthlS
    1:"2,
    uT pi)nssT s-f ep-t:() drqs: .ron ra3eLI
    Pursuant to the Receivership Orders issued in ifr-{:} (fI J u p r r s - r r rd
    '0(i . g
    11~;42:l.50.
    i : : l il,l
    20
    QtZ
    Aluo
    That billing statement totals only
    siTplo ] s; 6uTtt .
    1911is attached as Exhibit 2.
    Juauelpf lq tpq;, ,a lrqrq)<g s r ? F ) a q r E r , t :E
    f , s l. 6;T
    2009 '{eyq
    The Receiver's billing statement for the month of May, -l:()J lucrll,:elpf s
    1:8
    6OAZ 3:,c r.{fuoul eqf fru"r il-Trf s ;| - r e n . T O O a l : l o 1 _ { 1 , 8rT
    '()3l
    I=:ec,,"i'ley's office. 17
    JJO S | _ r 3 11, € ) ) a t : l L,T
    .1'::> 1r.' hI. ::: '1
    aL{:} se Ilurplrnq e:,!JJo alues paJeoo'l-
    16
    er{f ur
    a bank located in the same office building as the ) j u r ? c l E r { : ; , r L [ : : ) . ] . q , r \9 T
    ' l ...
    '>iueg A:n1ua3.=T se qr e qeted ,
    , 1 l a - ' rl , t r e r ; [ ] a , ; r 15
    fp lunoc:r? ll)I-rplu,,{auour t)aJn(3'u--
    _nsured money market account at 1 s t Century Bank,
    9T
    e uT pTeq a-rp spunJ drqs:aaraJC,::
    14
    ar.{J ,p,e:}.lr:da:
    the receivership funds are held in a reported, prev~o~sly
    r{Ts':.o'-r.a-rd s'rl
    As
    'T
    'o-lc-lso c- {r-L, ,q^s. - r o A r e 3 a _ r s - ! q ' ] u r
    311. '/7 in t.his receivership estate. ~;365,
    pTaq
    1311 ::OC9, the Receiver held '6:..J0,",,
    Lt,'I[€,E9e$ f o A r e i : ) € ) E e r . fJ ET
    'Tt lient uo
    and on May 31, pue ,S1u€,ruos-lnq:t;rp ou
    disburse~2nts, 12 Iitotaling $15.62, there were no
    a f o t { e . r e L [] '
    .:9'tI:: i : i r r r1 r ; : 1 c , i ZT
    pau-fea -
    elElse : ! q s . r e A r a c o _ r a L { l z { e 6 16 - r t : r p r ' r r : : , : l er
    11111epar1:, during May the receiversh p estate earned interest
    f so-lelu-l TI:
    As detailed in that financial :]eL{l ur peTrefep $v 'I
    9 is attached as Exhibit 1.
    sie pi:,q:lE?llp s1
    :~:OC
    (;10;::
    10 II
    TPr3uE?urI lrqrL{xu OT
    ' z { e 6 1 g : o r . { f , u o u ra q f fof ole:}se Crr4s:anro:)i:,J '[[)Lro(:.lxi:]
    srq:i,lo
    9' 11(!xpenciitures of this receivership estate for the month of May,
    s ;a - t t i . . } 6
    eql pue pa1oaffoJ
    A financial report detailing the funds collected and the spul'lJ eL{:} 6u-iTTelap 1:ode,: T r : ' r ; : r l€r ' u T . , r , q l
    8 II
    I
    ' S€rlllocoQ "[psriTuJsTp .le:)
    7 II c.ar; t errn i ria t e after that dismissal becomes final.
    feu-!f ] r : r r { f , J . e : } J E , i 3 : . E u r u " t Ji r f L
    / ] rTi , q '/ npr ur - l J (r ,)- Q
    - l ^d r - -.^-,..- 'UOTJ;:P
    q - S - f A n l - 3 J e - r
    As previously reported, this receivership S!ql 1J :\ . S n O l l } a^ l ^O, , J :it;i
    action. ha;
    :.Eqf S::'TU,1,lTl)
    6: II d i srnis s t
    t9
    ol eL{f, f:rrr1r,re:6 lap).o uEi po,lro:)ar - r a , r . ro i - , a i : l
    5 II Pec'E?i ver re c eiv e d an Order grantinq the Receiver's motion to
    uoTJou.I s r.fen receE I
    aL{f
    the '1r;rdX'
    During April, 6ur:ng 'lTr,sAeT
    411notion to dismiss his federal court lawsuit.
    :}-rnoJ Tp.rapol: sTLI s;srlus;tp, c.} r-rc)'1.:;o\.r v
    p peTTJ ptrp u,o-rJecrldde
    311Heceiver filed opposition to Zernlk's TRO application and filed a o1 uo'rJ-rsodclo -ra,4.ro:)a)il 'b
    C)H.l s,){-r uiaZ p r : ) lT J
    ot{f :alJe pe-cuep
    this Court's orders, which was denied after the s e / " 1 L { 4 , ' r L { M' s ; - r e p . r o s , l,rr1,oJ sTq:}
    wit~ 2 Ilaccordance
    L - J 1 : / v ta l L t E F ) -or i ) J r : r z
    ur spunJ drqsranro3af 6uts:n({s rp uo.rJ - r i } nT a : , e u iiq:t 6 -:ru 1 :,J -r'i;a.r
    111 re stra .in i n q the Rece i v e r from disbursing receivership funds in
    I
    j~
    ITillqlqx,i[
    ,'q'lfx~l
    ' . .

    631 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p631/679


    u3nt303u 'yvNU3lsvd 'r otA!/o
    DAVID J. PASTERNAK" I;~ECEIVIER
    3A|UOy93d 0r;ii[uoJ :tIVIlS;t dtHs]tf,At3a)3u
    IIRECEIVEI~SHIP ESTATE FOR 3,~!:O S. PECK DRIVE
    '1S
    IN nOCCVJ.:l)lUVl,llAlNOlfUSSSNIlsllg
    BUSdNESS MONEY MARKE"r ACCOUNT
    6OOi, (e61qbno.rqr6002 ,(en
    May 1, 2009 through May :31,
    'tf: '! ~~009

    aueN ouranl llqoQ llpaiS


    ~~lJrn
    oleo runl,l
    Date Name Memo Debit Credit Balance
    erueleg
    BUSINESSMoNE~~~:::'R~~IIETACCm:~,1 ST C:Er~TURY BAN~( f:l/c#11 00009677
    - lrtrrrr -E-Ifrr
    " LNflOOSV'1:1 l),lU\'W /\.3NOW SS:lNlSnA lSl 1L9600001!#c/B ),lNVg AUnlN3i)
    •••- -,-------
    9t ' 9 6 2 ' 9 9 C
    365,296.15
    aurocullsaralul 1re6 r(rn1ua1;1sg 9C1:) 60/t0/90 z 99 r // I te 99e
    05/31/09 (1)6 1st Century Bank Interest Income 1562 365,31177
    600i, le //9600001] t#o/e
    1061r tun1ue3ls I - l_NnOOtV,.13){rlvlf$,{3NOU\;
    1ueg1 tetol z9'9r /z't re'99c
    't€ i(r![t
    Total MONEY MAFlI<ET ,IICGOUNT - 1st Century Bank a/c#11 0(11 1100009677 at Mil~' 31, :1009 15.62 365,311.77

    Tnud7tsrms
    t/9 vs"l
    i0la:/t.
    L9( 6/1 WOO,,
    I 010/009/t
    476001000 I
    [XHIBIT -.L PAGE
    -4
    632 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p632/679
    i7,tlwlqxilr
    633 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p633/679
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p634/679 634
    l EXHIBIT c<J PAGE
    .- 17
    TsevdTIB|HXI
    $428.50 Total Amount of this Bill
    09 BZ'S llrE $rLlIlo ]uno[!b/ l[:r.lol.
    $4,00 peouP,Apv,!;lsoc)
    Total Costs Advanced
    lErlol..
    00r$
    4,00 €rltu.llsirlP:i
    f:ac::sirnile
    00t
    pa0uP^p'vrslri;oa)
    Costs Advanced:
    $78,00 195,00
    L l: l l l P r ^ e l eet s l l
    040 Lisa Kalaydjis.n
    008/$
    $346,50 0 09 6 1
    495,00 0 ?0
    0,70
    00 961 0/ 0 )lrjruJie'lsErd
    David J, Pasternak
    I plAeo
    09Ire$
    Amount Rate Hours Name a[EN
    I0Tibilv Sleu Timekeeper Summary
    atut.1-
    rt e uuurng radaa>1
    $42450 1.10
    09vzvg 0t t sast/rj€rs
    Total l.eqal Services
    letii3llHol-
    Amount
    IunoEV
    Davie J Pasternak
    llsLUalsBd I lCt,,t,e6,
    fees !IAaJ
    'll.id\/
    April, :2009 interim report; draft trransmittalletter to Buchalter re payment of
    1o luau.rIed al J€4leqon8ol Japal le1lulsuell yelp lyrldat rullalul 6Cl0Z:
    0,60 'lldy
    Review/analysis of Apnl, 2009 financial report; preparation of Receiver's r:t002i00l9 5/30/200Ei
    090 lpodal lErl3ueuu
    s;a1ta3au lO uc,tl,Etipdatd 600i1 1o t;tsr{1eur:,t1',l"atlt,ay
    Lisa Kaiaydjian ri:rsll
    ur?llp/{t?lP)4
    040
    0r0 /,1q1ur:ttu
    aJedolcl
    Prepare monthly financial report,
    Uodarlerrlueut.l
    Dav id J Pasternak
    ItsLu€rlsPd f Pl,',eC
    0,10
    0r0 L.l]l/^
    Exchanqe email with Zernik
    IlLfr€):z lleui:)a6ur:r1rx3 6a0zl6zl9
    5/29/20mJ
    ,Hours
    srn6-Fi
    f'rofHSS·lonal Services
    ' _._------------" ... cl
    saSr,uasill?uoislso.lr)J
    _---,_._~._,--_ .._.. ----------.'~_
    Professional Services Rendered Through: May 31, 2009
    l E l l ' lsr cs a J o l d
    6 0 0 Z ' L 0 ^ e U ! : q b n o l q l p o l a p u € ) Us a o l ^ ' . l a S
    n23Si0001 Our File
    t 0 c ) 0 , ' ; e z i 0all.l J l n o
    00,t/8ocs oN asBc unoc lr:,lladn5 s01
    salaoll'v
    ,(]uno3
    l.cs Anqeles County Superior Court Case No, SCOS7 4DO
    'le 'llulaz'
    Nivie Samaan v Joseph Zernik, et al. al/ lN
    qdasop A LIePtl.tPS:; :aU
    Re:
    la
    14757 Invoice No,
    L9L'L oN asto^Ul
    d t q sti:lnteco,11
    pa1utorldYPno3
    Court Appointed Receiversh ip
    '00
    June 03, 200B
    6002 aunf
    3105531540 Email: f'ASFIRM@PASLJ\W.COM
    0 t 9 t e g q0 l e nclc ntivnsva@n8lJSVd :||r{rlxf 'Nt:)LL\/d
    FACSIMILE JOHN W P/l,TTON, ,.IR
    Ul M NHOr
    fllu!rscvj LOS A:\GELES, CALU'OH ~rIA nOOU7-':!;)':!:l 'l\i/f!U:lI1SV'dl
    310553.1500 {:ACU-r9(X)(i \' I it lI ( ).'II'I \r' )'Sil;lt'Itr{I )N \/ !';() "I I OIAVC
    DAVID J P,t\STI:RNAI<.
    0 0 9 te 9 90 l e
    TELEPHONE '.l-SV3yUVd
    1875 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2200 J VIHINAo
    00ZZ:lllflSi Ull..l-N3C 9/8f )4V'l{)::l;l1l!'V<i
    CYNTHIA F P,ASTEI::lNAK
    3NOHd3lfl
    LAW CORPORATION ~,
    N )IVUOdUOS MV] '/
    & PAr-rr-rOX PASTER:~'.\J{ PAs.rEI.~XAI{.
    N O J.,J-,,V(I1P >l \" li:tl'd.LS V(I' >I \'.Ni:I l{ J'Si \/ <I
    N O,]hIlVd zlP)l \rfl i:IlfliL'q\'(I' )'l V.i''Jtsltlt.LSVd
    PAS'l'ERr',~AI{" PAS'rE:H~AI{ & PAT'I'ON
    A LAW CmtPO:;'ATION
    llCrllLW:iCd[lOCM\n V

    UnoO €iOciz aunf a6e4 7


    Court Appointed Receivership
    s:ilnracallpe1utorlclY
    drr"; June 03, 2009
    'e0 Page 2
    :q6ncuq1palapueus3{}l^lasleuols$oJoJcl 6002 LSLV' : ONaclo^ul
    1 0 0 0 t ! ; 0 Z e:/a l r J] n O
    Our File 7'3 ;235,1'0001 Professional Services Rendered Through: 'Le ley!
    May 31, 2009 Invoice No.: 14757
    - - - _..__. __ ..... _-------,------------ -------_._------------------------ IU?i6irY
    Amount
    6r't06$
    I:>revious Balance
    a 0 u e l P gs n 0 l , 4 a l c
    $901.49
    (OOlllg)tilgt'oN lce,qcl 1ui)1.u,{er''1
    6l)llzll/9 (ouloo$)
    6/1/2009 Payrnent· Thank You. Ct1i3Ck, No.43·1!~ (6/1/09)
    'no,\ )iueLli- ($901.49)
    aAuOIDed OZE:loJ aielsf
    Receivership Estate for :320 S. Peck Drive
    'S ,llqslanla:lilu

    09'8Zr$
    Balance due
    anp salueleS $428.50

    U
    lgvdaT IiElHXs
    EXHIBIT b PAGE s:
    635 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p635/679
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p636/679 636
    7l::J5,Pkadmgs'Pmofol'Sen'ic,: LKS 11-28-07.c1oc 1,\,
    J o p , / . 0 - 8 r -I l q ) ' l : ! t l / u o s .o . l f t ) l ( l \ s 3 u p E ; ) l d i,:!t:rf, $
    &PATION
    NOltVd ?
    PASTERNAK
    vvNUf.l-svd
    FASTERNAK
    YVNIJ]lSVC
    2n
    27
    Ltt
    uPuue0 ")
    C. German II 26
    L \L.-- -:::
    i I, (. 2S II
    /n
    /[C,/J L({ A...-/
    s;i,
    //--'\ 24 II
    (tirlr;oEuy
    'BJuJroJrlurJ i,i:
    ,6rD0U,g1
    {!
    Executed on June 18, 20(JI9, at Los Angeles, California.
    so.l lB eunl uo pielnJrax.{
    23
    foregoing is true and correct. 'lJaJJoc prJe €rn-rlsrrfiuloi:lla:oJ
    t:ii
    I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
    aql leql eltuolll€JJo aluls aqtJo ts,trulrr{l rapun,ftnhac[go,{11uuod 22
    (,(,
    ropuna;?loap]
    I
    person. s) being served. 'pa,t"rosiirur;rq
    (s
    21
    )r:or;.r:t'rJ t7:
    elli ol Xltca:rp(s)adolanus r,lleuosrad -I\/.NOljg1ld
    BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I personally delivered such envelope(s) directly to the [J
    {ons prsss71r1ap, I :31;'f1AUflS A{l t:l 20
    (}7:
    person(s) being served. 'paruosiiurarq(s
    )ucrsrad
    eqlJo ec$lo aqt ol pueq,iq (s)adolo,nuar{crlti
    paJo^rlap 'I\/\lolilllld
    BY PERSONAl SERVICE: I delivered such envellope(s) by hand to the office of the I[] 19
    I :IIJIAuES Afl lti 6'l
    provided for, addressed to the person(s) being served.
    'pelJosilur::q(s)uosreder{:tot pesseJpplT'ro3:popr,tord 18
    envelope or package designated by the overnight service carrier with delivery fees paid or 8il
    ro pred sea3,{renrlapqtl^Arelu€c ecr,\.reSlqEluo,to aqt ,(q pelrirErsepaEu!'cud.roacloionu;>
    uu ut 'sluautncopentocalol Jerrrp:r
    courier or driver authorized by the overnight service carrier to receive documents, in an 17
    acrlJes1qi:hurano aqt ,{q pazrJoq}nuJoArJpJOJar.lno) LI
    u ol (s)luounJop I{cnspaJeAIIap lo 'JeuJpci)Jr,fJes
    regularly maintained by the overnight service carrier, or delivered such document(s) to a
    l.1reprff;r:
    lq8rtuano::rqt,{q peulrelLrreu
    ,Qy11ceg
    BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I deposited such document(s) in a box or other facility
    raqloro xoq u ur (s)lueuncopqcnspalrsrodap I :,{,IIU1,I.IIO IIFIOINU 3,\O A{I
    1611[]
    [:] 9'l
    transmission was complete: and without error. 15
    .r().rJa
    lnoqlL!\ pur?ola.1duocse,\{uolsr;nusur?Jl sl
    sending facsimile machine properly issued a transmission report confirming that the
    eql l€ql Eutu-rguocgodar uolssr(usueJl'B l)enssrfpado:rCaulqcuru JIrLursJl?J
    iiurpuas
    el{l pue 'uorssr[usueJl sr,,/r\ '}stl
    forth in the service list. The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission, and the
    elrurscuJ,{q perprursueJl erJr16-1rr
    ar{l ur ripol
    14
    }uaumJopa[{J.
    The namers) and facsimile machine telephone numberts) of the person(s) served are set tl
    les are penras(s)uostadeqlJo (s)raqrunue,r"roqdelal aurqcuualrursJuJprru(rs')auuu aqn_
    'QtSI-tSS (61g) sert eult{oeru
    facsimile. The telephone number of the sending facsimile machine was (310) 553-1540.
    allturscelEurpru;r's
    eqlJo raqunu auoqdelat
    1.3
    aqJ. 'alrrrrrscpl €'l
    BY FACSIMILE: At or before 5:00 p.m., I caused said document(s) to be transmitted by
    ,{q pelyusuert aq ol (r;)luauncoppres;pesner1 ''urd 00:g eroJo(rtJo 0
    lV :g.IIWIf;lyd Ag [] 12
    in affidavit 7l
    lt./\tapg.JP ur 11
    cancellation date or postage meter date is more than I day after date of deposit for mailing
    EutlteurrogtrsodapJoateprage,{up 1 ue{l eJorrsr al€pJalau aEe6odJo oraprr0'trclla:tue:)
    'p,o/r.roS II
    1u1sod3r pIIPAutpeurnsardsr €rorlJars
    I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal
    ,{pud sqtgo uorloru uo luql o.ra,^ e ulp I
    'ssoulsnqJo esJnoc ,iruutpro
    deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business.
    aql uI fep aues '5'11a,r{l 10
    lur{:luo eJrAJoS l€}sod qlr,,rr, peltsodap 0'l
    sr 11 'Eurpuu JoJocuepuodsrluoc Eurssc,co"rd
    this firm' s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is
    puu uorlcr)llocJoa0rlcurc[t;.trt-lrl sn.l]
    q U , \ \ . . J P I I l u u 3 f 1 r p e a r . . u u 1 ' p r e ,d{a1r1dni ; u o r J r i ) r { l e E e t s o d q t r ^ A p o l r ? l . r r r i e . u o r J o l a , r . u a D r l l _
    The envelope "vas mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am "readily familiar" with 9
    "
    'BruroJrleJ'saleEuyso'I ~
    pig
    BY MAIIL: I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Los Angeles, California.
    le ll€tu eqt ur paltsoclop eq ol edolenueqrns pasnerI i'llI\/N Ag 8
    SEE ATT A(~HEn LIST
    JSI"I OililJYIIV ggs
    7
    iS,tttlll;tl';
    follows:
    parties in this action by placing true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as
    s?pessaJppe sedola,ruapelsesur pesolott$i.oaleqlsardocarulEurcul,:[ l.q uor:1cr;
    srqlur r;rlrguil 16 II
    palsaJelul
    NINETEENTH INTEIUM REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY, 2009 all interested
    II€ 6002'AVW dO HINOIAI Ult{I dO.{ Iltr0dtrU l^trltl3t.tNlIIJ.NI1'JJ.iltl{Il,J
    S,UgAIgJgU sppeqrrcsep luounropfiuro8arog eqlpa,,\lrrs
    On June ll~, 2009, I served the foregoing document described as RECEIVER'S
    I'600i:s6[eunf u() c
    5 II
    '
    4 II Fast. Suite 2200., Los Angeles, California 90067-2523.
    E',a.SI',-
    19006 pruoJrlEJ'sa 1a8utr' sol'00 a2:elrnS' Isu.l j'
    eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1875 Century Park
    sserppuSSOurSflQ,tur
    1:u6f:n1ual S/8[ sr'uIr.uoJIIeJJo i)r.]lt
    inorlcuurqtr,^A ol fuud u lou pu?sme,,( uoalqSra
    I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of
    ;o a8eeqlra^otupI ale,;s6sal)EuVso-IJo {lLrnoJoqlut pelolduua rruu1 t'
    .3 II
    COUI'~TY OF LOS i\NGELES .2 II STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
    SlI'II{),l)rl
    h' S0-l CO III\J nO J'Vl l{lCO.IIT\/ ) :{[) !t.]l\v'l-!i (
    PROOF OF SERVICE
    g)IA.U3ilS,ito JOOUd
    1
    W:,7323S\Plcadmgs\Proof of Service LKS 11-28-07.doc I~ PATION
    NOrlVd r)
    2 rc p,i0-82-I I S)1 al^res J{r.loor.Jisiiurpu:r1d
    r!iliilti' :,{,
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p637/679 637
    PASTERNAK
    vvNa3lsVd
    P/ISTERNAK
    vvNd3lsvd
    'i87
    28:
    27'
    L7
    '97
    26,
    ~,
    2,,'
    t;z
    24
    1r7
    2~1
    tiz
    22
    iK,
    21.
    E··Mail: j?J..~:~t~!@eanhlj.nk.net 17,
    17;Z-Vj :I r:rrIt' A
    I5E'Iu-ii{um @t,iS'
    t: I60'8(t6'I0B :ellurrrsrlrC 07
    20 II Facsimile: 801.998.0917
    Telephone: 310.435.9107
    1,0I 6'StF'0| [ :auctqir:lals,I
    Los Feliz, CA 90027 B.
    'ztla'l sol 6 I
    L8006V)
    llsorlce8loa5;lul€blt;11'Z
    U~ 2,05 Saint George Street
    BI
    In Pro PCI'
    red[o"ld 'rl
    Defendant in Pro Per
    rad otd uI tuDpua.jiirlll 17 II Joseph Zemik
    I]r"ure'zqldosof li"I
    Hi II Facsimile: 818.871.4669
    69tllt'ltB'tlt tl :ollurrsotC 9I
    1 elephone: 818.871.604:)
    s:?tl9'[/ 8'8| !l :ouc,q,ds13,1
    . I;I
    15 II C:alabasas, C'\91302
    z0t | (i ry'.)'s?sr?q?lu:)
    6puousauojSrlA
    I I-f,V :Shl s?'l 0z( s
    14 11 5220 Las Virgenes Road, MS: xc-n
    C ountrywide HOHlt:: Loans, Inc.
    'cul 6sLIBO'loruoFllorpr,y\lJ1{jm():) lzl
    2uJ'ltuDo'I awoH apt,Afutultt),',1
    Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. 'bs3 'rlroog'\r/ ppc.L
    13 II Todd A. Boock, Esq.
    't1 to -u o1yto p suno,'^,y
    Counsel for Non-Party, Sanford Shatz, Esq.
    'bs;1'zpq5 pJr)IurS
    {ir
    4 I I ••
    " itl
    Facsimile: 310.576.2200
    1 ]1 )Q(z 9 L,S;"0 1g :ollurrscr c
    Telephone: 310,576.2100 Irt
    tit0lZ' t) LS'0t t :auo'l{.ltiro[:,'.1
    'Eoluoy{r?lutrs
    98tZ-l:0t06\i J
    10 II Santa Monic~,CA 90401-2386
    '[enrrpuc,:61
    12.0 Broadwav, Suite 300 OI
    00[ ellns gi 1
    (» II Bryan Cave LLP
    41'1 onejl LIri:/fu1:l0
    ')ul 'r;uDo7 awoH ap,l,A&4un0,',)
    Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. 'bsE',(>1t;rntlplofi'
    Jenna Moldawsky, Esq. uruui lf
    Counsel for Non-Party.
    'rQto -uo71to p suno 'bsq 'ErequV 'l$, rngtr,f 8
    4 I ^'7
    n II John 'iJ\T. Amberg, Esq.
    7" F'lCSHrIl .r.oz
    . '1 e: -') 1') ... ~
    u, 13'"\8
    ""'0 t
    8 6 t I 0 i 1 9 " { . 1: o
    r l r m r s cJr
    () II Telephone: 213,620.1780
    i:|8,1I'02;1)' lt | ( :auo'rrtl la[;.1
    t,
    Los Angeles, C~A 90071··1448
    g7nl_t 1006.9,;,.sayoEru\i/ sc,l
    5 11333 South Hope Street, 48th Floor
    roolc rltgiz'toa:lii rado11 qln'llsi t (:
    tt
    'prrlrJ1:[au
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
    Counsel for Plaintiff. Nivie Samaan d'I'I uoldtuBHdt rolllrltl Utllntrt
    Keshavarzi, Esq. 5 4
    uDDwoSarMN'gltulDld rol psuno,:,| 'bsq'riile,luqsa)l0ol,\l lz I11'v[Ot~
    ~~
    ts:!"[a;r!^Jas
    Servia u« t;
    ••"
    Angeles County Superior Court Case No. SC 087 4'00 LO,5 a.
    'oN asrrJ trn(r:)t,touadns ttuno,,7 sapSulbls:oT
    00,, l80 rs
    _toffiWta-Z'iiA2@tq6
    /Vivie ..~~rmaan v. JosE~fl.~!.Zemik, etc.! et al. ]1
    It
    \N 732:3 ;,\PleadingsIProofof Service LKS 11-28-07.doc 8, PATION
    NOLLVd'8
    3 Jop l0-8U- | I q)'l aJt^ie\.lc .lcx.rud\si.utperl(1,,1;
    lalf4 .ry\
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p638/679 638
    P/\STERNAK
    vvNSfl'svd
    P~$TERNAK
    )rvNU31S,dd
    28
    27
    LL
    26
    97.
    25:
    241
    23i
    ,;c7.
    22
    21
    t7,
    20
    0z
    B.
    6I
    18
    8l
    17
    t-l
    1()
    9I
    15
    $I
    14
    I'l
    U
    f:I
    12
    7:l
    1l
    'I
    II
    I 10
    OI
    mi5 jiEFqiitr5@i;1;po-.;1pl .l
    I~ I F-Mail: kgjl~Ib2i@..g.!!!~ia:lav~.cQm
    '. Facsimile: 951.276.4405
    :1ru1tr,r]-
    ljjbt' 9/_7'.[ $1i:alILu:11;;r1]'{
    .~ II Teh::phone:951.276.4420
    0(.t b' 9 L7:.1.'
    I q6 :ouot{,0013 lL
    Riverside, LA ).,.501 .apt,sjri),\t.d
    I (lSi::6ry'.)
    'ianueA\/{1rsr:lnruq L,
    '7 112;.~(~:_~.!nive.~s,itr.:\venue~, Suite 560
    09S allns 1111;11
    'J'd 'solslJos$v
    P.c. ''stnuq 'frrro13op11 's3trrrr.uu.rn.;
    c: urnm ings, Mcf'Iorey, Davis, Acho & Associates, I
    .JUT 's T,ol.l)v I)
    Attorneyfor ADR Services, Inc.
    aJ r^t as I Q v ro-/'{auro l,tlt, "lbsi1'o1.ru;yr(I'E
    II Kathryn E. DiiCarIo, ESq[.
    u,;.rLlle'){9l
    5
    []loc-isIluqitftl@lFttiped(
    [··fVlail: mYY1!Is:l!1&Ll(1)U~:halter.co!!:n
    -1
    ru :1'ru1,1
    411 Facsimile: 213.630.5760
    09/s'0{:9' t I ia:elruu
    Telephone: (213) 891-0700 r.riru.lj'
    001.0- t68 (.f;I :ouo]i'l(tal3
    a)
    'sa1afiu\;
    Los A.. ngeles, California 90017-2457lL
    so
    .3
    LS:.V(.-L 100e,BluloJr;e ; I €'
    'p'ru',ra1no11
    10(H) \Vilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500
    :rrrqsFAr\ ('1100
    0(lii;;lallns [
    JaIITeNIJ0ll Pr,l
    2 II Buchalter Nemer
    0nli:l L
    Counsel for Mara Escrow
    tnoJJSE D.IDW tt:y" last:tno,,1 'bs3'11:tqcu711
    Wachtell, Esq. Mi(:hal~1
    [:ruq)t]\J 1
    I
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    EXHIBIT 4-q
    28

    INTERESTED PARTY JOSEPH H ZERNIK’S MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL/SETTING ASIDE


    Case No. BC351286
    639 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p639/679
    Joseph Zernik DMD PhD
    2415 Saint George St, Los Feliz CA 90027 Fax: (801) 998-0917 Email: jz12345@earthlink.net

    EMAIL RECEIVED FROM VETERAN FBI AGENT JAMES WEDICK ON AUGUST 21, 2008

    Below is a true and correct copy of an email note received on Aug 21, 2008 from James Wedick. By Sep 17, 2008,
    I have neither heard from the FBI nor from Mr Connoly, and I decided to call Mr Connoly.
    I deliberately called after hours, and I left him a message saying I received his name and phone number
    from James Wedick, and giving him my name and phone number, indicating that I would be glad to provide informationa
    if he called.

    Signed in La Verne California , Sept 17, 2008


    ___________________________
    Joseph Zernik

    X-pair-Authenticated: 24.23.12.44
    From: "James J. Wedick" <jwedick@fraudspecialists.com>
    To: "'joseph zernik'" <jz12345@earthlink.net>
    Subject: FBI!
    Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:30:02 -0700
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
    Thread-Index: AckDzKyhtQ0hC9s8QjOc5ce0LvUoWA==
    X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0;
    X-ELNK-AV: 0
    X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;

    Joseph,

    I just finished speaking with the FBI concerning the fraud involving your house please note I said the fraud concerning your house. Even
    though you have not provided any additional funds noting your retainer has been depleted, I spoke with Mr. L.J. CONNOLY
    [310.996.4401] on the mortgage fraud squad in Los Angels. He called looking for information so I returned his telephone call. I explained
    to him I though you had been victimized and if he sticks to the documents could possibly prove a fraudulently case.

    I said while I havent seen/read anywhere near all the documents various depositions and material suggest a fraud took place that I
    thought needs investigation. I cautioned you might want to talk about working other corruption cases and suggested before listening to
    same that he first handle the fraud involving the house to make sure he wasnt just chasing windmills. I told him you could be difficult, but
    were an intelligent individual whose case should be investigated because again the facts suggest a fraud took place and thats the issue.
    I told him the FBIs job was to pursue mortgage fraud even with difficult individuals noting thats an agents job and he agreed.

    I believe he said he spoke to you already and had looked at the documents and did think a fraud had taken place. Consequently, I
    thought he was likely to pursue an investigation. In the likely event Mr. CONNOLY calls you [because I think he will], Im going to suggest
    you control yourself and try NOT to get him to chase allegations suggesting Los Angeles judicial circuit is all corrupt [because its not].
    Thereafter, if per chance you are lucky and he is able to get the Bureau behind an investigation, hes going to need all the help you can
    give him in order to convince the U.S. Attorneys office to file charges which can be very difficult. Because youre a smart man, l know you
    know what I mean when I say youre going to have to remain extremely FOCUSED in order for CONNOLY to be successful.

    Again, getting the U.S. Attorneys office to file charges can be extremely trying job not to mention formidable so do not let yourself get
    distracted with QUI TAMS and the like. Im giving you this information because I want you to be successful. Because I think this
    opportunity gives you one last bite of the apple, I suggest you have available for CONNOLYs review only those documents/information
    concerning the fraud so he can quickly get a CLEAR picture of what happened. He needs you to be focused so that he can open an
    investigation and pursue a line of inquiry.

    Because you dont have the funds to pay me, I told him I was no longer engaged and didnt expect to do anything further noting the
    distance and the fact I believe I need to examine all the documents/dispositions before I could proceed further which is probably cost
    prohibitive. Getting an FBI agent to pursue your case is ideal so please dont blow the opportunity by confusing them with a civil case.
    Remember if they think they are being used to help with a civil fraud, the FBI will close the criminal investigation.

    Good luck with the FBI noting I dont intend to get further involved particularly with the FBI so dont even try sending emails suggesting
    same. Good Luck! And Joseph Im trying to be extremely helpful here so dont try to bully me with a thousand emails.

    640 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p640/679


    z Page 2/2 September 17, 2008

    Jim

    P.S. I hesitated to send this email, but I wanted you to understand the opportunity you have so dont blow it by trying to get them to
    consider working a corruption case.
    And this is extremely important DO NOT CALL HIM. LET HIM CALL YOU!

    Respectfully,
    James J. Wedick

    11230 Gold Express Drive


    Suite 310 - #0364
    Gold River, CA 95670-4484
    CA PI License #24057
    916.638.3566 (Direct)
    916.290.0999 (Fax)
    916.501.2805 (Cell)
    www.fraudspecialists.com
    www.FBIexpert.com

    CONFIDENTIAL PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS WARNING: This email along with any attachment is confidential and may contain legally
    privileged information protected by the attorney-client work product doctrine restricting/prohibiting disclosure. Information contained herein is for
    the exclusive use of within names individual(s) and/or entity(s), with any unauthorized use, including disclosure, copying, distribution, and/or use of
    content strictly prohibited. Violations may be investigated/prosecuted under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), Title 18, United
    States Code, Section 2510 thru 2521, with individuals convicted subject to criminal and/or civil penalties, including fines, imprisonment or both. If
    you are not the intended recipient and/or received this message in error, please notify the sender via reply email and/or telephone and thereafter
    permanently delete all copies of the message along with any attachment. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you!

    641 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641/679


    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    EXHIBIT 4-r
    28

    INTERESTED PARTY JOSEPH H ZERNIK’S MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL/RECONSIDERATION/SETTING ASIDE


    Case No. BC351286
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-1
    CONGRESSIONAL ASSISTANCE IN RE: FBI, DOJ

    Congresswoman Diane Watson in re: FBI


    Aug 8, 2008, Congresswoman Diane Watson's - Letter to
    Constituent in re: Inquiry with FBI ................... 1

    July 30, 2008, FBI Assistant Director Kenneth Kaiser's


    Response in re: FBI lack of response to Zernik's
    complaints. .................. 2

    Senator Diane Feinstein in re: FBI


    Sept 8, 2008, Senator Diane Feinstein's - Letter to
    Constituent in re: Inquiry with
    FBI ................... 3

    Aug 21, 2008, FBI Assistant Director Kenneth


    Kaiser's Response in re: FBI lack of response to
    Zernik's complaints. ................... 4

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-2


    Congresswoman Diane Watson in re: DOJ
    Aug 15, 2008, Congress Diane Watson's - Letter to Dept of
    Justice Becker in re: Zernik's request for Special
    Counsel ................... 5

    DOJ response to Congresswoman Watson - Pending

    Senator Diane Feinstein in re: DOJ


    July 25, 2008, Senator Diane Feinstein's - Letter to Dept of
    Justice Benezkowki in re: Zernik's request for Special
    Counsel ................... 6

    Sept 23, 2008, Senator Diane Feinstein's Letter to Constituent


    in re: DOJ response to inquiry DOJ .................... 7

    Sept 9, 2008, DOJ Director Kenneth Melson's Response


    in re: DOJ lack of response to Zernik's request for
    Special Counsel in re: Integrity of Operation of LA
    Superior Court ................... 8

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-3


    DIANE E. WATSON FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
    CALIFORNIA Subcommittee 011 AfrlCrl and Global Health

    Subcommittee eJrl ASia the PAClfll' zmrl


    VVASHING rON OFFICF the G loti a I F II V I r U II III e ~ il
    125 CAr--Jf\Jor'J BU!l L,IN' J

    \N!-\SHI~,J(J [UfJ, DC 20515


    OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNME-NT
    (202) 225 708<+
    1202\ 22r; 24)] I, ". I
    (£Oltgrcss ltf tl1c 1111itrll ~tatrs RE-F ORM COrv1rv1ITTtT
    "::,(Itl' I ,Iql1 ill ';c-, iili 0, lil'Pstl" ~"I/I

    ~llll9C 11£ [J{c~lrcn.entntittc6


    UIS] r::<IC T (jf til' C

    ~t32~) \Al" ~,~4"~L B, ' i : ' ;.f'l


    DtMOCR/\ TIC 8EGIONAL \iVHIP
    Fi\ii ,r;l lUi
    L \'-, A f\J' ,f ! I' CA '::) iJ() 10
    I 3:; 3) 965 1~ 2 :; CHf'.IR COllqrpSS!,lflal ElltprtalrirllE:nl

    13231 '::l6i) 111] 'f ',,- I[, d I J ~, t r I esC (1 U( II S

    .t~ I I I'" ~ '..\ c, r

    August 8~ 2008

    Dr. Joseph Zemik


    2415 St. George Street
    Los Feliz.. CA 90027

    Dear Dr. Zemik:

    1\1y office received a response rt:garding the inquiry we made on your behalf. For further
    assistance please follow the instructions on the letter from the Federal Bureau of Investigation
    and forward your information to the office listed in their letter.

    Sincerely~

    ~'.Ir~
    Diane E. Watson
    Member of Congress

    Printed 011 Recycled Paper

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-4


    u.s. Department of Justice

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    Washington, D. C 20535-0001

    July 30, 2008

    Honorable Diane E. Watson


    Member of Congress
    Room 302
    4322 Wilshire Boulevard
    Los Angeles, CA 90010

    Dear Congresswoman Watson:

    I am writing in response to your June 4, 2008, letter to the Department of Justice


    which was forwarded to the FBI for response.

    In order for the FBI to initiate an investigation of any complaint we receive,


    specific facts must be set forth to indicate that a violation of federal law within our investigative
    jurisdiction has occurred. Altl10ugh Mr. Zernik has made numerous allegations, there are
    insufficient facts to demonstrate a violation of federal law wit11in our investigative jurisdiction or
    to support the initiation of an FBI investigation.

    If Mr. Zernik has further details to support his allegations, he should provide them
    directly to the FBI's Los Angeles Office located at 11000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1700,
    Los Angeles, California 90024, telephone number (310) 477-6565.

    I hope this information will be helpful in responding to Mr. Zernik.

    Sincerely yours,

    \{L; " v . ,~H C___ f/C <

    Kenneth W. Kaiser
    Assistant Director
    Criminal Investigative Division

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-5


    09/10/2008 10:54 3239551113 CONGRESSWOMAN WATSON PAGE 03/03
    F=OREIGN I\FFAIRS COMMITTEE
    DIANE E. WATSON
    CALIFORNIA 5vbeon'lmitt!& on Alrlc! alld GIQb~1 H~.llh

    SLlbeommlttee on A~i •• the I'Milie nnd


    o WASHINGTON OFFICE, the Grob~1 I;nwl,onmAnt
    125 CANNON 8UILDING
    WASHiNGrON. DC 205! 5
    OVERSIG,",i ANO GOVERNMENT
    1.202) 225·70S4
    (2021 2.2!;l-'I422 (FAX I Cltnugreas af tqe '1uittit ~tafes RSFOAM COMMITTEE
    SUbcommltt"'A an Domoatic PolicV
    o OIS~ICT O~~ICE:
    iiinus!! of ittpttll.entatiuc,a
    4322 WII.SHIRF, BoUlEVAFlD
    Rl;!oM.l102 DEMOCRATIC REGIONAL WHIP
    Los M<:le.F.s. CA 900 10
    (323) 965-1422 CHAIR. COnSlr'lS~;onl'l Entertainment
    13231 965· 1113 (FAX) Industries CMlCl,Js

    WWW.HO\JS~.ijOV/WATsaN

    August 15,2008

    Grace C Becker
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    U.S. Department of Justice
    Civil Rights Division
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
    Washington, 20530 DC
    I am writing on behalf ofDr.loseph Zemik, a constituent in my district. As indicated in
    his letter to my office, he made a request about two months ago, but did not receive a response.
    It would be appreciated if you would review the enclosed documents and respond to Dr. Zernik,
    with a copy to my district office.

    Sincerely,

    Diane E. Watson
    Member of Congress

    cc: Dr. Joseph Zemik


    2415 St. George Street
    Los Feliz, CA 90027

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-6


    Ptil'l•• d on R6Cvclad ~~por
    DIANr~E FE'~STEIN

    'United ~tatrs ,5rnatr


    WASHINGTON DC 22511)0504

    11ttp fe:I'steI11 ser i1te.~ov

    September 8, 2008

    Mr. Joseph Zernick


    2415 St George St
    Los Angeles, California 90027

    Dear Mr. Zernick:

    I am forwarding on to you the response I lave received from the Federal


    Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about your case. We will continue to monitor your
    case with the Department of Justice.

    I hope that this response from the FBI is helpful and that the information
    outlined in it will clarify the situation for you. If you have further questions, or if
    there is any way my office can help you in the bJture, I hope you will contact me
    again.

    ./-""\ .. Sincerely, ~.'


    (0"""'I \~ ,,(; . ....,
    . ~:.t. ~) ~~p-,
    J •
    " . ./ Dianne Feinstein
    ../ United Slates Senator

    DF:mn

    SAN DIEGO OFi'ICE


    • r,1 ' _ I:'> •• ";-'.

    S I ,. ,'·Elu
    D,f 1 l>'" «'11:.~
    .J

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-7


    U.S. Department of Justice

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    \Va;hington, D. C. 20535-000 I

    August 21, 2008

    Honorable Dianne Feinstein


    United States Senator
    Suite 2450
    One Post Street
    San Francisco. CA 94104

    Dear Congresswoman Feinstein:

    I am writing in response to your July 25, 2008 letter to the FBI on behalf of your
    constituent, Mr. Joseph Zemick, who alleges corruption in the Los Angeles Superior Courts.

    Although Mr. Zemick has made numerous allegations, there are insuHicicnt facts to
    demonstrate a violation of federal law within our investigative jurisdiction or to support the initiation
    of an FBI investigation. In order for the FBI to initiate an investigation of any complaint we receive,
    specific facts must be set forth to indicate that a violation of federal law within our investigative
    jurisdiction has occurred.

    In the past, Mr. Zemick has been in contact with the FBI's Los Angeles Office and
    the Central District of Califomi a United States Attomey's Office regarding these same allegations. In
    addition, Mr. Zernick has requested various other elected representatives to contact the FBI and the
    Department of JuSlice on his behalf regarding these same allegations.

    If Mr. Zernick has further details to support his allegations, he should provide them
    directly to the FBI's Los Angeles Office located at 11000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1700, Federal
    Office Building, Los Angeles, California 90024-3672, telephone number (310) 477-6565.

    I hope this information will be heloful in responding to Mr. Zernick.

    Si rlcerely yours,

    V ~
    vt~A/ltu.
    Ken~eth W. Kaiser
    A~;sistant Director
    Criminal Investigative Division

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-8


    DIANNE FEINSTEIN COMMITIEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
    CALIFORNIA COMMITIEE ON THE JUDICIARY
    COMMITIEE ON RULES AND
    ADMINISTRATION-CHAIRMAN

    %:lntted ~tate5 ~enate SELECT COMMITIEE ON INTELLIGENCE

    WASHINGTON, DC 20510-0504
    http://feinstein.senate.gov

    July 25, 2008

    r':) /7-"0.,. r~ \\f


    I i ,

    '.
    .; .' .'
    .' ," J)
    /
    't
    '\ ,- ~
    .:
    ' ....
    j

    Dear Mr. Benczkowski:

    I am writing to bring to your attention a letter from Mr. Joseph Zemick


    regarding his request for a response to the letters he submitted to the U.S.
    Department of Justice. Please look into the issues raised, as quickly as possible, so
    I can appropriately respond to Mr. Zemick.

    Attached you will find the enclosures from my constituent to assist you with
    your review. After you have completed your review, please send your written
    response to Mirella Nieto of my San Francisco office. Ms. Nieto may be contacted
    by phone at (415) 393-0707, or by fax at (415) 393-07] 0, if you have any
    questions.

    Sincerely, ~ "

    IM.,.~~
    Dianne Feinstein
    United States Senator

    DF:mn

    FRESNO OFFICE LOS ANGELES OFFICE: SAN DIEGO OFFICE: SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE:
    2500 TULAHE- STREET 11111 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD 750 B S fREET ONE POST STREET
    SUITE 4290 SUITE 915 SLITE 1030 SUITE 2450
    FRESNO, CA 93721 Los ANGELES, CA 90025 SAN D,EGO, CA 92101 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
    (5591 485-7430 13101 914-7300 1619\ 231-9712 (415', 393-0707

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-9


    :::,;'J>JNE FEli\iSTEI,\
    .... r ~ (~r '\
    :=,~v1~ ..1,:EE C\, ~""E JUDiCiAR'-
    ~~:J~. n.1:T:EE I:'\j ~'_,LES .~r~D

    ,~[)MI'JI.sT,~ A -'O~J -, '~f-jAIRM ',I,


    llnircd ~tJtes ;Senate r:~-' :)\'11\,1 ,r -r:-F ~~ \,"1 L I,~

    WI"ISHINGTON, DC 2D510-0504
    htto)' feinstein.sende gov

    September 23, 2008

    Mr. Joseph Zernick


    2415 St George St
    Los Angeles, California 90027

    Dear Mr. Zernick:

    I am forwarding on to you the response I have received from the U.S.


    Department of Justice about your case.

    I hope that this response is helpful and that the information outlined in it will
    clarify the situation for you. If you have further questions, or if there is any way
    my office can help you in the future, I hope you will contact me again.

    ~
    ,
    SinCere~y,:;
    ,

    Dianne Feinstein
    I~'"
    l.~
    ,

    United States Senator

    DF:mn

    ~RES!\JO OFFICF LOS ANGELES OFFICE SMJ OliGO OFFICE SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
    S,r;t->- " ", i S/', -'\ \.lr ' B :.::.: 7SC t:s S-'-Pl : f"l ~-:; [ 1-<;,,1
    S' ,:'1 lLT 5, f- Y1 ~ 51 ,'r 1 (.'J,'J SI I, ;> ,1 ~)I",
    I': .:\ \"" t'~ Cl1 :jO07~ S,,' C,.'J, q,' ! -'\.

    :='3 41'

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-10


    ::).;.:.,~, ~"n j'4 730r) t;; Cj
    U.S. Department of Justice

    Executive Office for United States Attorneys

    Office of the Director Room 2261, RFK Main Justice Budding (202) 514-2121
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
    lVashll1gron, DC 20530

    SEP 09 Z008

    The Honorable Dianne Feinstein S~rl i-TcHC¥&f ~r Oil'lCe


    United States Senator
    One Post Street, Suite 2450 SEP 1 7 2008
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Action~"=~=._".,.,,,,, ,-=,"",

    Attn: Mirella Nieto

    Dear Senator Feinstein:

    This responds to your letter dated July 25, 2008, to the Office of Legislative Affairs,
    regarding your constituent, Joseph Zernik. Mr. Zernik asserts that the "Enterprise Track"
    procedures for real estate foreclosure cases in the Los Angeles Superior Court violate his civil
    rights and have resulted in his being improperly fined. He also complains that he has been
    prevented from inspecting and copying records of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

    Mr. Zernik's claims are currently pending before the United States District Court for the
    Central District of California in civil action 2008cv01550. The action names Superior Court
    judges and clerks as defendants. Because the issues are pending before that court, it would be
    improper for us to comment on those issues.

    Mr. Zernik states that he has already been in contact with the Federal Bureau of
    Investigation (FBI) and the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Central District of
    California. Legal and ethical constraints prevent us from discussing the status of any matter
    under consideration by a USAO, other than facts of public record. Please be assured, however,
    that United States Attorneys' Offices take all allegations of criminal conduct very seriously and
    carefully review any investigative evidence presented to suppoI1 such allegations. We encourage
    Mr. Zernik to continue to provide information that evidences criminal conduct to the FBI.

    We hope this information is helpful in responding to your constituent. Please do not


    hesitate to contact the Department of Justice if we can be of assistance in other matters.

    Sincerely,

    Kenneth E. Melson
    Director

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-11


    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    EXHIBIT 5-s
    28

    INTERESTED PARTY JOSEPH H ZERNIK’S MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL//SETTING ASIDE


    Case No. BC351286
    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-12
    1 P
    2 C
    3 w
    4 t
    5 A
    6 c
    7 P
    8 w
    9 M
    10 P
    11 I
    12 s
    13 q
    14 i
    15 t
    16
    17 I. SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT AND BACKGROUND TO LOS ANGELES
    18 COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ACTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF

    19 1. Countrywide’s Legal Division provided fraudulent records and Branch


    20 Manager Maria McLaurin –fraudulent declarations to support fabricated
    claims in litigation of Samaan v Zernik
    21
    22 News from courtrooms coast to coast provide evidence of Countrywide’s
    23 deceptive and dishonest litigation practices. On March 5, 2008, Judge Jeff Bohme, U.S.
    24 District Court, Houston, Texas, entered his opinion in case #05-90374 (Document 248-1
    25 & 248-2, our Docket #31), rebuking Countrywide’s legal division for:
    26 "a disregard for the professional and ethical obligations of the
    27 legal profession and judicial system”.
    28
    -3-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-13


    1 Judge Bohm’s 72-page opinion about Countrywide’s litigation practices was not
    2 based only on what transpired in his own courtroom. It was also based on a nation-wide
    3 investigation by the United States Trustee who presented a report to Judge Bohm.
    4 But the LA Superior Court continues to accord Countrywide and its legal team
    5 Courtroom privileges that are entirely contradictory to basic notions of Due Process, and
    6 which come directly at the expense of abusing Plaintiff’s right for Due Process.
    7 Plaintiff also requested Judicial Notice in Docket #31 of well publicized news
    8 reports of stock market events on Jan 8, 2008. On that morning the NYT published
    9 report that Countrywide’s counsels admitted in a Pennsylvania court that they had filed
    10 “recreated letters” as evidence. The news caused substantial instability in the stock
    11 market as a whole, and a precipitous drop in Countrywide’s share-price in particular,
    12 generating rumors of imminent bankruptcy, that were eventually stemmed only by
    13 Countrywide’s decision to allow change of control and a take-over by Bank of America,
    14 still to be finalized towards the end of 2008.
    15 Relative to Countrrywide records in Samaan v Zernik, Plaintiff alleges:
    16
    17 a) Recreated Underwriting Decision/Condition Letter
    18 Docket #44 presents a Countrywide record that is in fact a “recreated letter”.
    19 This record is a key document in the fraud against Zernik by Countrywide and
    20 Samaan. This letter is clearly dated and time-stamped for its date of issue as: Oct
    21 26, 2004. Moreover, on some of the copies of this record one finds fax header
    22 imprints indicating that it was also faxed from Countrywide to an unknown
    23 recepient (Samaan?) on Oct 26, 2004.
    24 This record, was introduced as evidence in Judge Connor’s court under
    25 unusual circumstances -
    26 i. It was entered as part of Sur Reply,
    27 ii. It was never authenticated by either Countrywide, Samaan, or Parks,
    28 and
    -4-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-14


    1 iii. Plaintiff’s Counsel filed evidentiary objections.
    2 Throughout the litigation of Samaan v Zernik Judge Connor practically refused to
    3 issue any evidentiary rulings, no matter how hard Plaintiff pressed for such. And
    4 obviously she relied on such evidence in her rulings and judgment, regardless of
    5 the fact that such evidence should have been excluded.
    6 Maria McLaurin, Countrywide Bank Manager, and a business associate of
    7 Samaan’s husband, contributed key fraudulent declarations that were
    8 quintessential for the fraud in the litigation in LA Superior Court. Our Docket #38
    9 is a compilation of McLaurin’s declarations and analysis of various statement
    10 made in them, to show where she misidentified and misrepresented banking
    11 documents.
    12 Regarding instant Underwriting Decision/Condition Letter (Docket #44) –
    13 she states:
    14 “I have been informed of Mr Zernik's allegation that the
    15 October 14, 2004 suspension letter was issued on October
    16
    26, 2004 and is "an instrument of deception." There is no
    merit to Mr. Zernik’s allegations. The suspension letter
    17 was issued on October 14, 2004 as evidenced by the date
    18 on the second page. The document was printed on
    19 October 26, 2004, not issued on that date. This
    suspension letter appears to be a printout from
    20
    Countrywide’s Computer program and to my knowledge
    21 is accurate and valid. There is no requirement that such
    22 letters be signed by the underwriter. The fact that the
    23 letter is not signed does not mean that it is not valid.”
    24 In fact, Maria McLaurin is clearly describing a case of a “recreated
    25 letter”. Samaan, Countrywide, and McLaurin never did the simple thing –
    26 produce the actual Oct 14, 2004 letter - if there ever was such a record – and

    27 authenticate it per the California Evidence Code. Instead, McLaurin is repeating

    28
    -5-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-15


    1 Countrywide’s “recreated letters” routine, as seen in the Pennsylvania case,
    2 news of which were published Jan 8, 2008 (Docket #31).
    3
    b) Real Estate Purchase Contract
    4
    Docket #45 is unquestionably the center of the fraud in litigation of Samaan
    5
    v Zernik. It was introduced for the first time by Samaan in Reply brief to her Aug
    6
    9, 2007 Motion for Summary Judgment, and it was the first time that Samaan
    7
    introduced the Purchase Contract in a Real Estate litigation, after Plaintiff’s Jan
    8
    30, 2006 Demurrer on Statutes of Frauds was denied by Defendant Connor.
    9
    The essence of the misrepresentation relative to this document is a false
    10
    claim that it was transmitted by fax from Parks to Countrywide on Oct 25, 2004,
    11
    at 5:03pm, and that such transmission was critical for Samaan’s loans approval.
    12
    In fact that document was never faxed on that day from Parks to Countrywide.
    13
    These false claims were based on the fax header imprints on this document.
    14
    However, the imprint is missing the identity of the sender, in violation of FCC
    15
    Regulations. Moreover, Plaintiff presented in the Aug 9, 2007 Summary
    16
    Judgment Hearing evidence that such imprints were generated as part of a
    17
    convoluted fax/wire fraud scheme.
    18
    The fax/wire fraud scheme described below is also summarized per element
    19
    in a table form, together with other forms of fraud by Samaan and others in
    20
    Docket #40, p19.
    21
    22
    2. Samaan and Others were involved in a convoluted fax/wire fraud Scheme
    23 against Plaintiff and against a Financial Institution
    24
    Samaan claimed that the contract was faxed by Parks to Countrywide on Oct 25,
    25
    2004, at 5:03pm, but this document, like all other writings introduced by Samaan, was
    26
    never authenticated. As part of his objection to the entering of such records as evidence,
    27
    Plaintiff presented that very same record as part of the set of records that demonstrated
    28
    -6-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-16


    1 that Samaan, Parks, Lloyd, and an unknown person at Countrywide (McLaurin?) were
    2 engaged in an elaborate wire/fax fraud scheme across state lines (see below). Such
    3 scheme was used to mislead plaintiff, an individual, and his realtor, and also to generate
    4 false loan records at Countrywide, a financial institution. The essence of that fraud was
    5 that Samaan received and transmitted faxes on behalf of her loan broker, Parks,
    6 assuming his identity, and operating a fax machine with no fax header ID. Therefore,
    7 there was never any fax from Parks to Countrywide on Monday, October 25, 2004,
    8 5:03pm. That transmission was in fact from Nivie Samaan in Los Angeles to her
    9 husband, Jae Arre Lloyd, also in Los Angeles.
    10 When and how did that record find its way into the Countrywide loan file?
    11 Plaintiff holds that that the answer to that question exactly is a key to
    12 understanding the fraud perpetrated by Countrywide against Plaintiff. Countrywide
    13 produced in response to subpoena what was misrepresented as true records of Samaan’s
    14 loan applications files. But the closer one looks at it, the more one realizes that these
    15 loan files do not make sense at all.
    16 Where did this document and others come from?
    17 When did this document and others get inserted into the loan file?
    18 By whom?
    19 Countrywide must keep record of such transmissions in order to comply with
    20 regulations, such as Regulation B of the Federal Reserve, yet there is nothing in
    21 Samaan’s loan file to provide such information.
    22 As a first approximation, Plaintiff believes that Samaan would fax the documents
    23 to Lloyd, in part in order to generate on them the fax header imprints with the desired
    24 time and date, which could be adjusted at will. Lloyd would then scan them, or better
    25 yet, have a digital fax machine, and will then email the images that appear like fax
    26 transmissions to Maria McLaurin at Countrywide. Maria on her part took over the
    27 underwriting of Samaan’s loan by October 25, 2004, and could plant the printouts of her
    28 email attachments from Lloyd in the loan file.
    -7-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-17


    1 Regarding the transmission of the Real Estate Purchase Contract, that Samaan
    2 falsely claimed had arrived at Countrywide on Monday, October 25, 2004, 5:03pm and
    3 effected dramatic progress in her loan approval – it is absolutely clear that the contract
    4 was not part of Samaan’s loan file by October 25, 2004, or for that matter even by Nov
    5 3, 2004. The Nov 3, 2004 Underwriting Letter (Docket #40, p115) still lists as
    6 Condition #4:
    7 “Provide complete executed purchase contract, escrow
    8 instructions will not act as a substitute”.
    9
    10 In short – the whole sequence of events described by Samaan was a fabrication,
    11 and it had no relationship to the progress of the underwriting as documented in the
    12 records produced by Countrywide.
    13
    14 Samaan’s counsel presented evidence that was inherently illogical – as described
    15 above, and he failed to authenticate the records. Plaintiff objected on the basis that such
    16 records were part of fraud. In addition, as Plaintiff reminded Defendant Connor in the
    17 Aug 9, 2007 hearing, Defendant Connor’s Court’s calendar had a hearing scheduled for
    18 Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions per CCP §128.7 against Samaan’s Counsel, Att
    19 Keshavarzi, for filing this fraudulent document and several other similar Countrywide
    20 records.
    21 Defendant Connor refused to issue evidentiary rulings in this regard ( Exh ).
    22 Defendant Connor clearly relied upon the fraudulent Contract record described above
    23 (Docket #45) and claims made by Samaan in this regard in her Aug 9, 2007 Order
    24 Granting Summary Judgment (Exh Vol IV, p115).
    25 “…and the fax from Victor Parks to Countrywide on
    26 October 25, 2004 (Opposition, Exhibit U)”.
    27
    28 Judge Connor similarly (Exh Vol IV, p119) states:
    -8-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-18


    1 “As of October 25, 2004, Ms Samaan ha fulfilled all
    2 obligations, except for removal of the appraisal
    3 contingency. The appraisal contingency could not be
    4 removed until Ms Samaan received loan approval [sic –
    5 usually it is the other way around - jz]. Approval of the
    6 loan was delayed because Countrywide had not received
    7 a fully executed copy of the purchase agreement.”
    8
    9 The true facts in this matter are:
    10 i. Based on the true written records of Samaan’s loan
    11 underwriting (to be distinguished from McLaurin’s false
    12 statements in this regard) there was no special progress in
    13 Samaan’s loans underwriting on October 25, 2004 at all.
    14 The one major change on that day was that McLaurin
    15 effectively took over underwriting of the loans, and
    16 removed the duly assigned Underwriter – Diane Frazier,
    17 although in her false statements she tries to paint the picture
    18 of a Branch Manger who was removed from the business of
    19 approving any specific loan application.
    20 ii. On Oct 25, 2004, McLaurin, acting as Underwriter for
    21 Samaan’s loans without due authority, sent the Branch
    22 Input Exception Request to Mr Gadi (Docket #40, Exh J).
    23 In it, she further inflated Samaan’s annual income from
    24 $400,000 per year to $4,000,000 per year, and also made
    25 credit worthiness statements regarding Samaan that had no
    26 base in reality, and were not accompanied by a valid
    27 CLUES report. Mr Gadi saw through all that, and his Oct
    28
    -9-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-19


    1 29, 2004 Gadi’s Exception Request Response (Docket #40,
    2 Exh N) clearly stated:
    3 • that it was not an approval,
    4 • that the loan applications needed to be reviewed by a
    5 branch underwriter instead of McLaurin, and
    6 • that a valid CLUES report had to be generated.
    7 iii. In addition, Appraisal Review was ordered by McLaurin on
    8 that day (Docket #40, Exh L), but the results of that
    9 appraisal review would arrive only on Nov 3, 2004 (Docket
    10 #40, Exh P) .
    11 iv. Had McLaurin not removed Diane Frazier from
    12 underwriting the loans, none of the progress described
    13 above would have taken place either. After discovering the
    14 fraud in Samaan’s Loan Applications (Docket #40), Frazier
    15 demanded new valid loan applications, and Samaan refused
    16 to comply with that demand.
    17 v. Regardless of McLaurin’s efforts to fund Samaan’s Loan
    18 Applications, when she presented them for funding, they
    19 were Denied Jan 27 2005 by Countrywide Bank (Docket
    20 #40, p118).
    21
    22 The picture presented in the moving papers for the Aug 9, 2007 Motion for
    23 Summary Judgment, and in McLaurin’s false statements (Docket #38), Samaan’s
    24 Loan Applications were approved on Oct 25, 2004, and as a result of that she could
    25 finally remove her Appraisal Contingency on that day as well. That inherently
    26 illogical sequence of events, was apparently triggered by the falsely claimed fax
    27 transmission on Monday, October 25, 2004, 5:03 pm of the copy of the Contract.
    28 According to this false statement of the facts, events moved so quickly relative to
    -10-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-20


    1 underwriting of the loans from that moment on, that on the very same day, Monday,
    2 October 25, 2004, by 5:18pm, just 15 min later, Samaan could remove her appraisal
    3 contingency. In fact - the results of her Appraisal Review would arrive only on Nov
    4 3, 2004.
    5
    6 3. Countrywide’s Samuels and Mozillo Refused to Stop the Fraud Perpetrated
    7
    against Plaintiff or Make any Statement regarding the Authenticity of the
    Underwriting Decision/Condition Letter and the Real Estate Purchase
    8 Contract.
    9
    One would think that figuring out the authenticity of a banking document such as
    10
    the Underwriting Decision/Condition Letter (Docket #44) or the Real Estate Purchase
    11
    Contract (Docket #45) would not be that difficult, given the various regulations that are
    12
    enforced on financial institutions. In addition, Countrywide was closely related to this
    13
    case. After all, Countrywide’s Chief Legal Counsel Samuels is a close personal friend
    14
    of Defendant Goodman, and also a friend of Defendant Friedman. Moreover, during
    15
    much of the litigation Samuels served as President of the Board of Bet Tzedek – the
    16
    “House of Justice”. Samuels featured prominently in web pages of that organization,
    17
    where he called for fighting against fraud in general, and real estate fraud in particular
    18
    (Exh ). In such web pages he called for anybody who is a victim of fraud to call him
    19
    for help.
    20
    Similarly, Mr Mozillo is featured in web pages on Corporate Ethics, and
    21
    Coroporate Resonsibility, where he calls for anybody with information about fraud in
    22
    Countrywide to approach him.
    23
    Accordingly, in early 2007, Plaintiff approached Mr Mozillo and Mr Samuels,
    24
    expressed his concerns that Countrywide was involved in fraud against him, and asked
    25
    that they authenticate or repudiate the documents that Plaintiff holds to be the key to the
    26
    fraud – the Underwriting Decision /Condition Letter (Docket #44), and the Real Estate
    27
    Purchase Contract (Docket #45).
    28
    -11-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-21


    1 In response, the Bet Tzedek web pages featuring Mr Samuels and his calls for
    2 fighting fraud were hastily removed from the web, and soon after that Countrywide
    3 appeared in Defendant Connor’s Court, and initiated procedures that were some of the
    4 most abusive of Plaintiff’s rights for Due Process and Free Speech – the July 6, 2007 Ex
    5 Parte Application and the July 23, 2007 Short Notice Hearing, both for Protective
    6 (gag) Orders. Their aim was to prevent Plaintiff from claiming that Countrywide was
    7 colluding with Samaan in fraud.
    8 In over a year that passed since Plaintiff first approached Mr Mozillo and Mr
    9 Samuels in this regard, Countrywide has consistently refused to make any statement
    10 whatsoever on the regarding the authenticity of the documents that are the Underwriting
    11 Decision/Condition Letter (Docket #44) and Real Estate Purchase Contract (Docket
    12 #45). With that they allowed McLaurin, a Countrywide Branch Manager to continue to
    13 produce false and deliberately misleading declarations (Docket #38), and therefore,
    14 colluding with Samaan in her fraudulent litigation in LA Superior Court.
    15
    16 4. Countrywide’s Appearances in the LA Superior Court were some of the
    17 Worst Abuses of Plaintiff’s Civil Rights for Due Process, Free Speech, and
    Possession
    18
    19 Both of these procedures were part of abuse of Plaintiff’s Due Process rights.
    20 The Ex Parte appearance was scheduled and conducted in violation of local rules. It was
    21 allowing Countrywide a purported Discovery Motion, when discovery motions were no
    22 longer allowed to other parties in this case. Defendant Connor than made rulings after
    23 the fact, that Discovery Cut Off Date did not apply to Countrywide, but only to Plaintiff.
    24 Moreover, in their first appearance, on July 6, 2007, Countrywide asked for a
    25 comprehensive Gag Order on Plaintiff that defied any notion of Free Speech rights.
    26 While Judge Connor denied that application, she allowed Countrywide to re-file its
    27 moving papers, without giving it any deadline for such filing, while she set a deadline
    28 for Plaintiff to file his opposing papers by July 12, 2007, for a shortened notice hearing
    -12-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-22


    1 on July 23, 2007 (July 6, 2007 Minute Order, Exh Vol II, p236). As was done in all
    2 previous hearings, Plaintiff was denied a copy of this Minute Order at that time, based
    3 on a false and absurd notation “Notice Deemed Waived” appearing at the bottom of the
    4 Minute Order, which Plaintiff found out about only much later.
    5 Countrywide eventually served Plaintiff with its moving paper after he his
    6 deadline for the opposing papers.
    7 Moreover, as described below, and as clearly annotated in Sustain Case History,
    8 which is part of the Electronic Trial Court Records that are usually not available to
    9 parties in LA Superior Court, but are part ot the Electronic Trial Court Records that
    10 Plaintiff managed to obtain, these procedures were held by Defendant Connor as “off the
    11 record” procedures (e.g. Docket #39: Docket of Samaan v Zernik, pp57-58) :
    12
    13 “07/06/07 Event
    14 Exparte proceeding
    Jacqueling A. Connor
    15 9:00am
    16 NON-PARTY, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS,
    INC,’S EXPARTE APPLICATION FOR
    17 PROTECTIVE ORDER
    18 …
    …
    19 Proceeding not recorded”
    20
    21 There is no way that Plaintiff or his Counsels would have participated in court
    22 proceedings that are “off the record”. But as Plaintiff eventually realized, after
    23 investigation of the minimal records that he was allowed access to, many or even most
    24 of the strange and unusual proceedings held by Defendant Connor and others were “off
    25 the record” proceedings. The notion itself stands in defiance of any concept of Due
    26 Process rights of Amendments 5th and 14th of the United States Constitution. Further
    27 information on the use of Electronic Court Trial Records in Sustain as an instrument of
    28 fraud on litigants is provided below.
    -13-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-23


    1 Moreover, from that point on, Countrywide Counsels appeared on a regular
    2 basis in court hearings of Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), albeit their party designation
    3 was never determined. Zernik appeared before each and every one of Defendants that
    4 are Judges of the LA Superior Court with Requests for Safeguard of Due Process, which
    5 included a request for determination of Countrywide’s party designation. Such requests
    6 were always denied, and Defendants that are the LA Superior Court and its Judges
    7 continued to designate Countrywide at will any of the following, sometimes two or three
    8 of the following designations in one court document: Non Party, Defendant, Plaintiff,
    9 Cross Defendant, Intervenor, Objector. Etc.., without any legal foundation.
    10 Moreover, in the Feb 15, 2008 hearings before Defendant Friedman Countrywide
    11 sought a Court Declaration:
    12 “that Countrywide has no Obligation to Respond Further to
    13 Defendant Zernik Regarding This Action.”
    14
    15 The Feb 15, 2008 Transcript also reflects that unusual request (Exh Vol III
    16 p642). In that hearing Defendant Friedman also allowed Countrywide a shortened
    17 notice hearing on a Bench Trial for Contempt (Feb 15, 2008 Minute Order, Exh Vol II,
    18 p380, March 3, 2008 Minute Order, Exh Vol II, p384, March 7, March 7 Minute
    19 Order, Exh Vol II, p385) . Non of these Minute Orders were available to Plaintiff in
    20 time for challenging such procedures in California Court of Appeal.
    21
    22
    23 5. Defendants that are the LA Superior Court and its Judges held many or most
    24 proceedings in Samaan v Zernik “off the record”, and are not part of
    proceedings for which they may claim judicial immunity.
    25
    26 Please take notice of the following documents:
    27 a. Docket # 39, Volume I, Case History, p190-195,
    28
    -14-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-24


    1 b. Docket # unassigned yet, Exh Vol I –Addendum, Case History Jan 1, 2008-
    2 April 30, 2008, p195.1 – 195.29
    3 c. Docket #52-1, Exh Vol II-Addendum, Minute Orders Jan 1, 2008-April 30,
    4 2008, p392-410
    5 Defendants that are the LA Superior Court and Judges of that Court developed a
    6 pattern of conducting Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) as procedures “off the record.” As
    7 such, such proceedings are not part of their activity in their judicial capacity for which
    8 they are entitled to judicial immunity.
    9
    10 The sequence of events in Dec 2007-March 2008:
    11 a. Dec 26, 2007 – Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Appearance before Defendant who is
    12 Supervising Judge Rosenberg for Due Process.
    13 After the fact Plaintiff found out, although he was never noticed of
    14 such, that this was again, an “off the record” procedure, and the Dec
    15 26, 2007 Minute Order was invalidated/vacated after being issued.
    16 b. Jan 30, 2007 – Plaintiff’s ex parte Appearance before Defendant who is Judge
    17 Terry Friedman for immediate release of funds held by the Court with no legal
    18 basis.
    19
    20 Such Bench Trial was conducted in violation of the most basic notions of Due
    21 Process, with insufficient time for Plaintiff to prepare his opposition, with failure to
    22 properly serve summons, with failure to serve Plaintiff the very order that he had been
    23 falsely been claimed to have violated – the non-existent gag order that was the product
    24 of the “off the record” proceeding by Defendant Connor on July 23, 2007.
    25
    26 March 3, 2008, and March 7, 2008
    27
    28
    -15-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-25


    1
    2 6. Defendants That Are The LA Superior Court And Its Judges Failed To Issue
    3 Assignment Orders To The Judges Named As Defendants In This Case,
    Therefore, These Judges Are Not Eligible for Judicial Immunity In This
    4 Case.
    5
    6 Although Plaintiff appeared on several occasions before the Judges named as

    7 defendants in this case, and also before the Defendant Rosenberg, the Supervising Judge,

    8 to ask for Notice of Re-Assignment Orders of Samaan v Zernik to the several judges

    9 who acted as Presiding Judges, such requests were always denied.

    10 The only Re-assignment Order found in this case on the record that appears

    11 legitimate is for Defendant who is Judge Connor (Exh Vol II- Minute Orders, pp200-1).

    12 However, this record is likely to be part of fraud inherent in Sustain. Page one of this

    13 order is dated 11/1/2005 as its date of entry in the record, whereas page 2 of the same

    14 order is dated 1/30/2006. Plaintiff demands his right for full access to electronic Trial

    15 Court Records, and believes that he would find there full evidence to show that this

    16 order is a case of fraud.

    17 No Reassignment Order was ever found for any of the other Defendants who are

    18 judges.

    19
    20 7. Defendants who are Judges of LA Superior Court are not Eligible for
    Immunity since they Officiated as Presiding Judges with no authority at all
    21 after being Disqualified.
    22
    23 None of the Defendants who are judges had their disqualification adjudicated as
    24 required by law. Therefore, after the first disqualification for each and every one of
    25 them, they were acting without any authority and without any immunity.
    26 The notion heard by Plaintiff that it is a “Local Custom” in LA County not to
    27 adjudicate Answers to disqualification is out of compliance with the law, and a
    28 fundamental abuse of Plaintiff’s Due Process rights.
    -16-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-26


    1 Defendants without exception entered responses to disqualfications that are a
    2 combination of Strike and Answer. Such is deemed un-allowed response by a judge to
    3 disqualification for cause by the Bench Guide of the California Judicial Council.
    4 Regardless, the Answer had to be adjudicated for the Judge to regain his/her
    5 authority after disqualification statement was filed, and with it to regain his/her
    6 immunity.
    7
    8 8. Defendant who is Retired Judge O’Brien engaged in Obrstruction and has
    9 no reason for immunity at all.

    10
    Defendant O’Brien himself conceded that he was operating without any authority
    11
    when he lodged a Proposed Order for his own appointment on September 14, 2007, that
    12
    is after he conducted a hearing on Sept 10, 2007, where he conspired with Samaan’s
    13
    Counsel, per Oct 11, 2007 Transcript, how to execute an “Entered Oral Judgment”.
    14
    15
    9. Defendant who is Receiver Pasternak
    16
    17 Defendant Pasternak is not eligible for immunity since his appointment on
    18 November 9, 2007 was the outcome of a fraudulent motion. Exhibit A in that Motion,
    19 which was to be the legal foundation for the appointment was stated in Att Kehsavarzi’s
    20 Declaration under penalty of perjury to be the “Judgment by Court Pursuant to CCP
    21 437c” issued on Aug 9, 2007 by Defendant Connor.
    22 In fact Att Keshavarzi never included the Judgment in any document, since he did
    23 not recognize it as a valid record. Instead he included under Tab A the Aug 9, 2007
    24 Order Granting Summary Judgment. Such an Order is not sufficient as the basis for
    25 execution of judgment as entailed by Pasternak.
    26 Defendant Pasternak is also involved in fraud relative to the document entered on
    27 the record in LA County Register/Recorder, as the subject for transfer of Deed.
    28
    -17-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-27


    1 10. The facts disclosed in this complaint regarding the mode of operation of the
    2
    LA Superior Court and Conduct of its Judges are extraordinary and unusual
    and justify action by the US District Court, where normally abstention is
    3 preferred per the Younger Theory.
    4
    The facts that are disclosed in this complaint regarding Defendant that is the LA
    5
    Superior Court, its electronic Case Management System –Sustain, and the conduct of
    6
    Defendants who are Judges of that court, including but not limited to:
    7
    8
    a. Conducting proceeding but denying litigant access to Trial Court
    9
    Records:
    10
    Defendant that is the LA Superior Court and all Defendants that are
    11
    Judges of the LA Superior Court
    12
    b. Conducting “off the record” proceedings without the knowledge of the
    13
    participants:
    14
    Many or most proceedings in Samaan v Zernik. Full access to
    15
    electronic Trial Court Records is required to document in full the
    16
    exact nature of each proceedings. Here are some notable samples:
    17
    1. Connor - Nov 9, 2006 - Trial Setting Conference
    18
    2. Connor - Nov 9, 2006 - Expunge Lis Pendens
    19
    3. Connor - July 6, 2007 - Gag Order for Countrywide
    20
    4. Connor - July 23, 2007 - Protective Order–Countrywide
    21
    5. Connor - Aug 9, 2007 - Summary Judgment
    22
    6. Connor - Aug 9, 2007 - Leave to Amend Claims
    23
    7. Rosenberg - Dec 26, 2007- Ex Parte for Due Process
    24
    8. Friedman -
    25
    26
    c. Conduct proceedings where they mislead litigants regarding the nature
    27
    of the proceedings:
    28
    -18-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-28


    1 1. Connor - Aug 30, 2007- Conference was deemed a
    2 Motion Hearing
    3 d. Conducting proceedings where they switch on and off the record, at
    4 will, without prior notice or agreement of the participants:
    5 1. Connor - Aug 21, 2007 - Ex Parte Hearing
    6
    7 e. Invalidate/vacate proceedings and Court Orders after the fact without
    8 any notice to litigants:
    9 1. Connor – Jan 30, 2006 – Demurrer, OSC, ISC
    10 2. Goodman - Oct 3, 2007 - Recusal
    11 3. Segal - Nov 5, 2007 - Short Notice/Receiver
    12 4. Hart-Cole Dec 7, 2007 - Recusal
    13 5. Friedman Dec 13, 2007 - Countrywide
    14 6. Rosenberg Dec 26, 2007 - Ex Parte Due Process
    15 7. Friedman Jan 30, 2007 - Ex Parte Release Funds
    16
    17 f. Conduct Bench Trials with disregard to basic concepts of Due Process
    18 (Aug 9, 2007 – Jacqueline Connor, March 7, 2008 - Terry Friedman)
    19 1. Connor - Aug 9, 2007
    20 2. Friedman - March 7, 2007
    21 11. Defendant Connor colluded with Samaan and Countrywide in fraud against
    22 Plaintiff, engaging in Abuse of his Due Process, Free Speech. and
    Possession Rights, and in Obstruction of Justice.
    23
    24 Plaintiff alleged that Defendant Connor was acting in bad faith and engaging in

    25 Obstruction of Justice:

    26 a) In finding of such an outlandish fabrication as the true facts in this matter,

    27 b) In refusing to issue evidentiary rulings in this hearing and prior hearings (Exh..),

    28
    -19-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-29


    1 c) In issuing of the Aug 9, 2007 Order Granting Summary Judgment in Favor of
    2 Samaan and the Aug 9, 2007 Summary Judgment .
    3 Defendant Connor’s bias against Plaintiff was best demonstrated in the Aug 21,
    4 2007 hearing, where according to Plaintiff’s Counsel she referred to Plaintiff as “the
    5 Pest”, and explained that she would “treat him accordingly”. Plaintiff included
    6 these remarks in his Aug 30, 2007 Case Management Statement (Exh ), And
    7 Defendant Connor’s comment at the opening of that proceeding to the effect that
    8 Plaintiff “Dishes it out in her face”. Such comments were deleted from the
    9 transcripts. Major other parts are missing from the Aug 21, 2007 Transcript per Verified
    10 Statement of Plaintiff former Counsel (Exh ).
    11 LA Superior Court continues to deny Plaintiff access to “shorthand notes” or “raw
    12 notes” that were the basis for these transcripts, and are litigation records. As is the case
    13 with other litigation records in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), it is only reasonable to
    14 conclude that a Court that denies litigant access to litigation records, in violation of
    15 California and United States Law, and in abuse of Plaintiff’s Civil Rights for Due
    16 Process, is doing so to avoid higher liability to the court that is inherent in such records.
    17 Plaintiff is seeking protection with the United States Court against continued
    18 abuse by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Plaintiff holds that he has no chance for
    19 better treatment in other California Courts unless he is allowed access to his litigation
    20 records, part of his rights for Due Process.
    21 Defendant Connor’s conduct in the hearing of Aug 9, 2007 Motion for
    22 Summary Judgment were similar to her conduct in the course of the litigation before and
    23 after that day. But in the hearing on that day she made an abundance of decisions and
    24 rulings that entirely defy logic.
    25 The fax/wire fraud was first uncovered by Plaintiff’s realtor on Oct 18, 2004,
    26 when he was trying to fax the Notice to Buyer to Perform to Mr Parks. From Oct 18,
    27 2004 to Oct 20, 2004, Mr Libow sent each day an email to Mr Parks, and asked that he
    28 clarify the concerns regarding diversion of fax transmissions sent to him to Samaan.
    -20-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-30


    1 Parks responded to the email, but he never responded in any way regarding the fax
    2 transmissions questions.
    3 Therefore, when Zernik issued instructions to cancel escrow on Oct 21, 2004, it
    4 was not only because Samaan failed to obtain her loans approved and failed to remove
    5 the respective contingencies. It was also because Plaintiff was realizing that he was
    6 involved with a group of well-trained real estate and mortgage fraud experts, all of them
    7 professional in that field. Little did he know what was waiting in store.
    8 And therefore, one is hard pressed to figure out how Judge Connor came up with
    9 the following statement in the Aug 9, 2007 Order Granting Summary Judgment in favor
    10 of Samaan (Exh Vol IV, p116) :
    11 “… resulting delay in Ms Samaan’s ability to remove the
    12 appraisal contingency, the concededly sole basis for Mr
    13 Zernik’s cancellation of escrow”.
    14 In fact, Plaintiff spent the entire time of his oral arguments on Aug 9, 2007
    15 Summary Judgment Hearing, on cataloging and detailing the various types of fraud
    16 Samaan engaged in during the failed real estate transaction in 2004, and later, in the
    17 litigation of Samaan v Zernik in LA Superior Court (Exh Vol III, p455). But Defendant
    18 Connor was clearly not interesting in finding any fraud anywhere – not with
    19 Countrywide, and not with Samaan, and likewise, she wanted to make sure that Plaintiff
    20 would not even allowed to bring such arguments – by denying him the right to amend
    21 his claims.
    22 For convenient reference, some of the more blatant frauds are now listed in tables
    23 in Docket #40, p16, with the relevant Code sections, elements, and references to
    24 evidence satisfying the various elements.
    25 And yet, at least one of the fraud types was demonstrated beyond any doubt. That
    26 was the “fraudulent inducement” – Samaan used false Prequalification Letter, with
    27 forged signature of Mr Parks to substantiate her qualification as a buyer, when in fact
    28
    -21-
    ZERNIK v CONNOR ET AL , VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    .

    ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p641-31

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen