F RACTAL ROBOTS

B.Tech Seminar Report

Submitted by

CLINT PAUL
JYANEEE059

in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of

Bachelor of Technology Degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering
under the University of Calicut.

D EPARTMENT OF E LECTRICAL & E LECTRONICS E NGINEERING

March 2017
D EPARTMENT OF E LECTRICAL & E LECTRONICS E NGINEERING

CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Seminar Report entitled

FRACTAL ROBOTS

is a bonafide work done by

CLINT PAUL
JYANEEE059

in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Degree of Bachelor of Technology
in Electrical and Electronics Engineering under the University of Calicut.

Seminar Coordinators Head of the Department

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I take this opportunity to thank everyone who helped me profusely, for the successful
completion of my seminar work. With prayers, I thank God Almighty for his grace,
blessings and unseen guidance.

I sincerely thank our Management, Principal Dr.K.K. Babu and Head of the Department
Mr. Ratnan P. for providing me the facilities to carry out this seminar.

I would like to sincerely thank Ms.Anu Sunny for her guidance, invaluable help and also
for correcting my mistakes during this work.

I thank our Seminar Coordinators Mr. Shijoh V & Ms. Aswathy Rajan for their
constant encouragement during the seminar. I also give my sincere gratitude to all faculty
and technical staffs of the department for their extreme help.

Finally, I take this opportunity to thank all my friends and others who helped me directly
or indirectly in successfully completing this seminar work.

CLINT PAUL (JYANEEE059)

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy i Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

ABSTRACT

The birth of every technology is the result of the quest for automation of some form of
human work. This has led to many inventions that have made life easier for us. Fractal Robot is a
science that promises to revolutionize technology in a way that has never been witnessed before.
The principle behind Fractal Robots is very simple. You take some cubic bricks made of metals
and plastics, motorize them, put some electronics inside them and control them with a computer
and you get machines that can change shape from one object to another. Almost immediately, you
can now build a home in a matter of minutes if you had enough bricks and instruct the bricks to
shuffle around and make a house! It is exactly like kids playing with Lego bricks and making a
toy hose or a toy bridge by snapping together Lego bricks-except now we are using computer and
all the work is done under total computer control. No manual intervention is required. Fractal
Robots are the hardware equivalent of computer software.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy ii Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ii
LIST OF FIGURES v
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Overview .... 1
1.2 Organization of Report ... 2
2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND WORKING 3
2.1 What are Fractals? . 3
2.2 Fractal Robots 3
2.3 Fractal Robots Mechanism 4
2.3.1 Simple Construction Details . 4
2.3.2 Movement Mechanism . 6
2.3.3 Details of the Screw Mechanism .. 8
2.4 Implementation of Computer Control 9
2.4.1 Fractal O.S. ... 10
2.4.2 Fractal Bus ... 10
2.5 Movement Algorithms ............................................................................... 10
2.6 Self Repair . 13
3. APPLICATIONS OF FRACTAL ROBOTS 17
3.1 Bridge Building .. 17
3.2 Fire Fighting .. 18
3.3 Medical Technology .. 19
3.3.1 Medical Applications ... 20
3.4 Defense Technology .. 21
3.5 Earth Quake Applications .......................................................................... 22
3.6 Space Exploration ...................................................................................... 23

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy iii Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

4. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 25

4.1 Limitations ............................................................................................................ 25
4.2 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 25
REFERENCE 26

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy iv Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Title Page No.

1.1 Lego Bricks ................................................................................... 2

2.1 Fractal robot cubes ........................................................................ 3
2.2 Frame & Plate of a cube ................................................................ 5
2.3 Contact pads on plates ................................................................... 5
2.4 3D image of a cube ........................................................................ 6
2.5 Cross sectional view of plates ....................................................... 7
2.6 Separation of cubes ....................................................................... 8
2.7 Screw mechanism .......................................................................... 9
2.8(a) Shifting of cubes L-Streamer method ........................................... 12
2.8(b) Shifting of cubes L-Streamer method ........................................... 12
2.9(a) Self-repair I ................................................................................... 13
2.9(b) Self-repair II .................................................................................. 14
2.9(c) Self-repair III ................................................................................. 14
2.9(d) Self-repair IV ................................................................................. 14
2.10 Conveyor belt system .................................................................... 16
3.1 Bridge making ............................................................................... 17
3.2 Entering of FR through an Entrance ............................................. 19
3.3 FR involving a medical surgery .................................................... 20
3.4 FR in defense field ........................................................................ 21
3.5(a) Earth quake applications I ............................................................. 22
3.5(b) Earth quake applications II ............................................................ 23

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy v Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW
The birth of every technology is the result of the quest for automation of some form of
human work. This has led to many inventions that have made life easier for us. A robot is
generally designed for one particular activity, or at best a few closely related activities. This of
course isn't the ideal situation as many jobs require a large number of very different activities.
For example, building the walls of a house and installing plumbing and electricity require very
different tools and techniques. In practice this means you'll end up designing either several
different robots or a very complicated one.

Modular robotics is one answer to such problems. Typical modular robots consist of a
number of independent cubes, which can move and connect themselves in many different
ways. Each of the cubes have their own power supply and intelligence and can have specific
tools. When a problem is fed to its computer, it analyzes it and connects the cubes in such a
way that it can solve the problem.

Ideally such a robot would consist of a very large number of very small identical cubes.
This is similar to the way plants, animals or humans are consisting of many cells, which are
practically identical, with the difference that specification would happen in software rather
than in chemical composition. Fractal Robot is a science that promises to revolutionize
technology in a way that has never been witnessed before.

The difference between fractal and modular robotics is that the former allows multiple
sizes of cubes and the latter does not. Most people are familiar with the fact that sufficient
quantities of clay bricks (architectural bricks) or Lego bricks (shown in fig.1.1) can be used to
approximate nearly any shape, and so our introduction to modular robotics was in terms of
cubes. Instead of making each cube independent, some researchers make pairs or triplets of

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 1 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017
cubes independent. However, some robot cists point out that rhombic dodecahedron are, in
some ways, superior to cubes.

Fig.1.1 Lego Bricks

The principle behind Fractal Robots is very simple. You take some cubic bricks made
of metals and plastics, motorize them, put some electronics inside them and control them with
a computer and you get machines that can change shape from one object to another. Almost
immediately, you can now build a home in a matter of minutes if you had enough bricks and
instruct the bricks to shuffle around and make a house! It is exactly like kids playing with Lego
bricks and making a toy hose or a toy bridge by snapping together Lego bricks-except now we
are using computer and all the work is done under total computer control. No manual
intervention is required. Fractal Robots are the hardware equivalent of computer software.

1.2 ORGANIZATION OF REPORT

This report has been divided into four chapters. Chapter 1 includes overview and
organization of the report. Chapter 2 contains the soul of the topic, i.e. System description and
working. Chapter 3 is for applications of fractal robots. And the last chapter is for conclusion
and limitations. And also it includes references.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 2 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

CHAPTER 2

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND WORKING

2.1 WHAT ARE FRACTALS ?

A fractal is anything which has a substantial measure of exact or statistical self-
similarity. Wherever you look at any part of its body it will be similar to the whole object.

2.2 FRACTAL ROBOTS

A Fractal Robot physically resembles itself according to the definition above. The robot
can be animated around its joints in a uniform manner. Such robots can be straight forward
geometric patterns/images that look more like natural structures such as plants. This patented
product however has a cubic structure. The fig.2.1 below shows a collection of such cubes.

Fig.2.1 Fractal Robot cubes

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 3 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017
Fractal Robots start at one size to which half size or double size cubes can be attached
and to each of these half size/double size cubes can be attached respectively. This is what
makes them fractal. So a fractal cube can be of any size. The smallest expected size is between
1000 and 10,000 atoms wide. These cubes are embedded with computer chips that control their
movement.
Thus they can be programmed to configure themselves into any shape. The implication
of this concept is very powerful. This concept can be used to build buildings, bridges,
instruments, tools and almost anything else you can think of. It can be done with hardly any
manual intervention. These robots can assist in production and manufacture of goods thus
bringing down the manufacturing price down dramatically.

2.3 FRACTAL ROBOT MECHANISM

2.3.1 Simple Construction details

Considerable effort has been taken in making the robotic cubes as simple as possible
after the invention has been conceived. The design is such that it has fewest possible moving
parts so that they can be mass produced. Material requirements have been made as flexible as
possible so that they can be built from metals and plastics which are cheaply available in
industrialized nations but also from ceramics and clays which are environmentally friendlier
and more readily available in developing nations.
The robotic cubes are assembled from face plates which have been manufactured and
bolted to a cubic frame as illustrated in fig.2.2

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 4 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

Fig.2.2.Frame & Plates of a cube

The cube therefore is hollow and the plates have all the mechanisms. Each of these face
plates have electrical contact pads that allow power and data signals to be routed from one
robotic cube to another. The plates also have 45 degree petals that push out of the surface to
engage the neighboring face that allows one robotic cube to lock to its neighbor. The contact
pads could be on the plates themselves or be mounted separately on a purpose built solenoid
operated pad as shown in fig. 2.3

Fig.2.3 Contact Pads on Plates

The contact pads are arranged symmetrically around four edges to allow for rotational
symmetry. These contacts are relayed out and only transmit power when required to do so. If

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 5 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017
they are operating submerged, the contact pads can be forced into contact under pressure
because of the petals, removing most of the fluid between the gaps before transmitting power
through them.
A 3D rendered image of what the robotic cube looks like in practice is shown in fig.2.4

Fig.2.4. 3D image of a Cube

The contact pads are not shown in fig.2.4. What is shown are four v shaped grooves
running the length of the plate that allow the petals to operate so that the cubes can lock to each
other and also each other using its internal mechanisms.
The cubes have inductive coupling to transmit power and data signals. This means that
there are no connectors on the surface of the robotic cube. If the connectors are used, wiring
problems may follow. Unlike contact pads, inductive coupling scale very well.

2.3.2 Movement Mechanism

To see the internal mechanisms, we need a cross section of the plate as illustrated in
fig.2.5.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 6 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

Fig.2.5 Cross sectional view of plates

The petals are pushed in and out of the slots with the aid of a motor. Each petal could
be directly driven by single motor or they could be driven as a pair with the aid of a flexible
strip of metal. The petals have serrated edges and they engage into the neighboring robotic
cube through the 45 degree slots.
The serrated edges of the petals are engaged by either a gear wheel or a large screw
thread running the length of the slot which slides the cubes along.

Separation distance between cubes

The petals sit on a ledge such that a separation distance is always maintained between
the robotic cubes. The separation distance allows the robotic cubes to slide with minimal
friction. The separation distance between the robotic cubes is important to allow the robotic
cubes trapped in the centre of a structure to move as illustrated in Fig.2.6.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 7 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

Fig.2.6. Separation of cubes

To move the rod at the center which is completely surrounded by a ring, the center
robotic cubes should not be in full contact with the ring. If it were, the top layers would have
to be peeled away before the central rod can be moved.

Sliding, Locking, Attaching and Detaching Cubes Using their Petals

Because the petals are mounted at an angle, the robotic cubes cannot separate when
they are engaged. If two petals are engaged, then they can slide back and forth in the slots
without separating. If all four petals are engaged, then the two cubes lock. If all four are
withdrawn then the robots disengage.
If they ever truly become detached without belonging to the same structure (i.e. without
being held by another robotic cube), then they can't re-attach without a special tool that holds
them the right distance away from another robotic cube for the petals and slots to align
correctly. For this reason, robotic cubes never let go of each other unless they have been
explicitly commanded to do so.

2.3.3 Details of the Screw Mechanism

With the use of the screw mechanism to move the petals, the robotic cubes have very
heavy lifting capabilities. Also, with these screws, should the system experience power failure
during an operation, the robot stops immediately and safely without any form of slip or
instability. A cross section of the screw and guides to move the petals is shown in Fig.2.7.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 8 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

Fig.2.7. Screw Mechanism

2.4 IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER CONTROL

All active robotic cubes have a limited microcontroller to perform basic operations such
as the communication and control of internal mechanism. The commands to control a Fractal
Robot are all commands for movement such as move left, right etc and hence the computer
program to control the robot is greatly simplified in that whatever software that is developed
for a large scale robot, it also applies to the smaller scale with no modifications to the command
structure.
The largest component of the Fractal Robot system is the software. Because shape
changing robots are fractals, everything around the robot such as tooling, operating system,
software etc must be fractally organized in order to take advantage of the fractal operation.
Fractal Robot hardware is designed to integrate as seamlessly with software data structures as
possible. So, it is essential that unifying Fractal architecture is followed to the letter for
compatibility and interoperability. Fractal architecture dominates the functions of the core of
the O.S, the data structures, the implementation of the devices etc. Everything that is available
to the O.S is containerized into fractal data structures that permit possible compatibility and
conversion issues possible.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 9 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

2.4.1 Fractal O.S

The Fractal O. S plays a crucial role in making the integration of the system seamless
and feasible. A Fractal O. S uses a no: of features to achieve these goals.

1. Transparent data communication

2. Data compression at all levels

3. Awareness of built in self-repair.

A Fractal O. S converts written code into machine commands for movement. The data
signals are fed to a bus (fractal bus). The electronics have to be kept simple so that they can be
miniaturized. Towards this end, the Fractal Robot uses principally state logic. So its internal
design consists if ROM, RAM and some counters.

2.4.2 Fractal Bus

This is an important and pioneering advancement for fractal computer technology. A
Fractal bus permits Hardware and software to merge seamlessly into one unified data structure.
It helps in sending and receiving fractally controlled data.
Computer software controls the shaping of objects that are synthesized by moving
cubes around. To reduce the flow of instructions the message is broadcast to a local machine
that controls a small no: of cubes (typically around 100 cubes). All cubes communicate using
a simple no: scheme. Each is identified in advance and then a no: is assigned. The first time
around, the whole message and the no. is sent but the next time only the no. is sent.

2.5 MOVEMENT ALGORITHMS

There are many mechanical designs for constructing cubes, and cubes come in different
sizes, but the actual movement method is always the same.
Regardless of complexity, the cubes move only between integer positions and only
obey commands to move left, right, up, down, forward and backward. If it can't perform an

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 10 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017
operation, it simply reverses back. If it can't do that as well, the software initiates self-repair
algorithms.
There are only three basic movement methods.

Pick and place

N-streamers
L-streamers

Pick and place is easy to understand. Commands are issued to a collection of cubes
telling each cube where to go. A command of "cube 517 move left by 2 positions" results in
only one cube moving in the entire machine. Entire collection of movements needed to perform
particular operations are worked out and stored exactly like conventional robots store
movement paths. (Paint spraying robots use this technique.)
However there are better structured ways to storing movement patterns. It turns out that
all movements other than pick and place are variations of just two basic schemes called the N-
streamer and L-streamer.
N-streamer is easy to understand. A rod is pushed out from a surface, and then another
cube is moved into the vacant position. The new cube is joined to the tail of the growing rod
and pushed out again to grow the rod. The purpose of the rod is to grow a 'tentacle'. Once a
tentacle is grown, other robots can be directed to it and move on top of it to reach the other
side. For bridge building applications, the tentacles are grown vertically to make tall posts.
L-streamer is a little more involved to explain and requires the aid of fig.2.8(a).
L-streamers are also tentacles but grown using a different algorithm.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 11 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

.
Fig.2.8 (a). Shifting of cubes by L- Streamer method

Basically, an L-shape of cubes numbered 4, 5, 6 in figure 9a attached to a rod numbered

1, 2, 3, and then a new cube 7 is added so that the rod grows by one cube until it looks like
figure 9f.
The steps illustrated in figure 9b to 9e can be repeated to grow the tentacle to any length
required. When large numbers of cubes follow similar paths, common cubes are grouped into
a collection and this collection is controlled with same single commands (left, right, up, down,
forward and backward) as if they were a single cube as illustrated in fig.9(b).

Fig.2.8 (b). Shifting of cubes by L- Streamer method

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 12 Department of EEE
Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

By grouping cubes and moving them, any structure can be programmed in and
synthesized within minutes. Once the pattern is stored in a computer, that pattern can be
replayed on command over and over again. The effect is somewhat similar to digitally
controlled putty which is as flexible as computer software. Digitally Controlled Matter is the
Hardware Equivalent of Computer Software.
Tools mounted inside cubes are moved with similar commands. The commands to
operate the tool are stored alongside the cube movement instructions making the system a very
powerful programmable machine.

2.6 SELF REPAIR

There are three different kinds of self-repair that can be employed in a fractal robot.
The easiest to implement is cube replacement. Figures 2.9(a) to 2.9(d) illustrates some images
taken from an animation.

Fig.2.9 (a) Self repair I

In respect of self-repair, the animations show how a walking machine that has lost a
leg rebuilds itself by shifting cubes around from its body. Some of the intermediate steps are
illustrated across fig.2.9 (b) to 2.9(d).

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 13 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

Fig.2.9 (b) Self repair II

Fig.2.9 (c) Self repair III

Fig.2.9 (d) Self repair IV

Instead of discarding its leg, the robot could reconfigure into a different walking
machine and carry the broken parts within it. The faulty parts are moved to places where their
reduced functionality can be tolerated.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 14 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017
Regardless of how many cubes are damaged, with this self-repair algorithm, cubes can
detach further and further back to a known working point and then re-synthesize lost structures.
The more cubes there are in the system, the more likely the system can recover from damage.
If too many cubes are involved, then it will require assistance from a human operator. In such
circumstances, the system will stop until an operator directs it to take remedial actions.
Systems designed with fractal robots have no redundancy despite having built in self-
repair. Every cube in a system could be carrying tools and instrumentation and thus loss of any
one cube is loss of functionality. But the difference in a fractal robot environment is that the
cubes can shuffle themselves around to regain structural integrity despite loss of functionality.
In space and nuclear applications (also in military applications), it is difficult to call for
help when something goes wrong. Under those circumstances, a damaged part can be shuffled
out of the way and a new one put in its place under total automation saving the entire mission
or facility at a much lower cost than simply allowing the disaster to progress. The probability
of success is extremely high in fact. Take for example a triple redundant power supply.
Although the probability of each supply failing is same as the norm for all power supplies of
that type, the chances of more than one failing is very much less. By the time a third power
supply is added the probability becomes miniscule. The same logic applies to fractal robots
when restoring mechanical integrity. Since there are hundreds of cubes in a typical system, the
chance of failure is very remote under normal circumstances. It is always possible to redundant
tools and then functional integrity can also be restored. This technique gives the highest
possible resilience for emergency systems, space, nuclear and military applications.
There are other levels of repair. A second level of repair involves the partial dismantling
of cubes and re-use of the plate mechanisms used to construct the cubes.
For this scheme to work, the cube has to be partially dismantled and then re-assembled
at a custom robot assembly station. The cubic robot is normally built from six plates that have
been bolted together. To save on space and storage, when large numbers of cubes are involved,
these plates mechanisms can be stacked onto a conveyor belt system and assembled into the whole
unit by robotic assembly station as notionally illustrated in fig.2.10. (By reversing the process,
fractal robots can be dismantled and stored away until needed.)

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 15 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

Fig.2.10.Conveyor Belt System

If any robotic cubes are damaged, they can be brought back to the assembly station by
other robotic cubes, dismantled into component plates, tested and then re-assembled with
plates that are fully operational. Potentially all kinds of things can go wrong and whole cubes
may have to be discarded in the worst case. But based on probabilities, not all plates are likely
to be damaged, and hence the resilience of this system is much improved over self-repair by
cube level replacement.
The third scheme for self-repair involves smaller robots servicing larger robots. Since
the robot is fractal, it could send some of its fractally smaller machines to affect self-repair
inside large cubes. This form of self-repair is much more involved but easy to understand. If
the smaller cubes break, they would need to be discarded - but they cheaper and easier to mass
produce. With large collections of cubes, self-repair of this kind becomes extremely important.
It increases reliability and reduces down time. Self-repair strategies are extremely important
for realizing smaller machines as the technology shrinks down to 1 mm and below. Without
self-repair, a microscope is needed every time something breaks. Self-repair is an important
breakthrough for realizing micro and nanotechnology related end goals.
There is also a fourth form of self-repair and that of self-manufacture. It is the ultimate
goal. The electrostatic mechanisms can be manufactured by a molecular beam deposition
device. The robots are 0.1 to 1 micron minimum in size and they are small enough and
dexterous enough to maintain the molecular beam deposition device.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 16 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

CHAPTER 3

APPLICATIONS OF FRACTAL ROBOTS

3.1 BRIDGE BUILDING

One of the biggest problems in civil engineering is to get enough bridges built as rapidly
as possible for mass transit and rapid development of an economy. Shape changing robots are
ideal for making all manners of bridges from small to the very largest. The bridging technology
introduced here can be used to patch up earthquake damaged bridges, and they can also be
used as a means for the shape changing robot to cross very rough terrain without descending
ravines.
For developing nations, there is a huge shortages of bridges that can cause national
development to be held back. Bridge building across impassable ravines as illustrated below
would become a key part of national economic recovery. A good point about this robot is that
local materials can be used to build bridges. Whether its wood, stones, mud, bricks etc, robots
would eventually be built that could use any of these materials to make bridges rapidly. To
grow a suspension bridge, the shape changing robot grown a bridge by extending a rod and it
feeds the rod using the L-shape streamer from underneath the rod. The rod is suspended using
a cable attachment to a bridge support pair of pylons as illustrated in Fig.3.1.

Fig.3.1. Bridge Making

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 17 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

The supports of the bridge are weighed down by hollow buckets which have been filled
with sand, earth or water to give bulk. The cable is released from a rotating drum which allows
the rod to grow. As the rod grows, the head of the cable is moved further up to the front of the
rod to suspend the tip of the rod. The pylons that support the cable can also be raised to increase
the bridging distance.
Once the shape changing robot has reached the other side, it can upload a vast quantity
of robotic cubes through the narrow rod and deposit the foundations for the complete bridge.
If the bridge is too long to be bridged by a single span, then at regular intervals, pylons can be
erected for support. These kinds of bridges can be shrunk to minimum width to present
minimum targets during military emergencies and natural disaster conditions such as high
winds and earth quakes.

3.2. FIRE FIGHTING

Firefighting robots need to enter a building through entrances that may be very small.
The machines themselves may be very large and yet they must get through and once inside,
they may have to support the building from collapse.
To a great extent firefighting is an art and not completely reliant technology. You need
men and machine to salvage the best out of the worst possible situations and often application
of a little common sense is far better than sending in the big machines.
But equally there are times where only machines with capabilities far beyond what we
have today are capable of rescuing a particular situation. The application of shape changing
robots is about those situations.

Entering Buildings
Shape changing robots can enter a building through entrances that are as small as 4
cubes. Fig.3.2. below shows what a robot can do to enter a room through a duct. These shape
changing robots could be carrying a fire hose in which case on entering they can apply the hose
immediately.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 18 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

Fig.3.2. Entering of F.R through an entrance

3.3 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY

Medical technology in the future may be applied on the spot to victims of fire using
shape changing robots that are completely integrated into the robot in a machine that is
fundamentally identical to the robot - only fractally smaller and equipped with tooling and
computer software that can administer drugs and perform operations.

Sometimes, it may become necessary to search for people in rubble and cut them out
of wreckage and in this, the robot could be immensely useful when they are equipped with
fractal fingers.
Only a shape changing robot with fractal fingers and fractal tools can sift through the
rubble without disturbing it further to search for survivors and bring them out alive. Using
conventional methods, you always run the risk of trampling over someone with your equipment
or loosening something that leads to further disturbance. Shape changing robots can prevent
that by filtering into the rubble and then erecting supporting structures that are anchored to
more stable supports. It can then remove the rubble piece by piece without creating too much
disturbance. A fractal machine is needed to do the operation because without it you can't deal
with the different kinds of objects that you find in the rubble.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 19 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

3.3.1 Medical applications

A fractal robot system with 1 mm cubes can squirt into the human body through a 2
mm pin hole and rebuild itself inside the body into surgical instruments and perform the
operation without having to open up the patient (Fig. 3.3).
A size 1 mm is just adequate for nearest point of entry into the site of injury from the
surface to perform very complicated surgery to remove cancers, cysts, blood clots and stones.
The machine reaches its objective from nearest geometric point of entry by threading itself
past major blood vessels or pinching and severing them if they are not for negotiation. The
smaller the machines the more readily it can be used to directly operate from the nearest entry
point with the least amount of wounding to the patient.

Fig.3.3. F.R involving a medical surgery

A machine like this could operate on shrapnel victims. As shrapnel is a fractal object,
the wounding it causes is fractal in nature. Thus a fractal machine is needed to deal with a
fractal wound. The faster the machines operate all around the body, the more likely the patient
can survive the damage. In normal use, this machine must be able to drain bad blood and fluids,
detect and remove all foreign objects that have entered the body, sew up minor wounds after

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 20 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017
cleaning and medicating them, sew together blood vessels and nerve bundles using microsurgery
methods before sealing major wounds, move shattered bone fragments inside the body and hold
them in position for a few days while it sets back, and when necessary, perform amputations that
involves cutting through flesh and bone. This surgical robot as described is called a Fractal
Surgeon.

3.4 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY

The use of new technology of fractal shape changing robots in defense applications is
going to completely change the way warfare is conducted in the next millennium.

Fig.3.4. F.R. in Defense Field

The machines even at the slow speeds shown in animated Fig.3.4. Can dodge incoming
shells at 2 km distance by opening a hole in any direction. While most tanks and aircraft need
to keep a 4 km distance from each other to avoid being hit, this machine can avoid being hit
and return fire inside 2 km, while carrying a formidable array of fractal weapons integrated
into a true multi-terrain vehicle, making them totally lethal to any passing War fighters,
aircraft, tanks, and armored personnel carriers; surviving shelling, rockets and missiles. As the
technology moves on to hydraulic & pneumatic technology, shell avoidance is feasible at
practically point blank range.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 21 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017
Nothing survives on extended warranties in a battlefield. With self-repair, these
immortal machines are no match for state of the art research directions in present day military
robotic systems, which are mere toys in comparison.

3.5 EARTH QUAKE APPLICATIONS

Fig.3.5 (a)

Once a building is damaged by earthquakes, the terrain inside (and outside) the building is
completely undefined. You need true multi-terrain vehicles with walking abilities that can
transform interchangeably into crawling machines to get past obstacles and reach the buildings and
structures that need to be repaired. You need firefighting robots to fight fires, you medical robots
to look after the injured and you need that same machine to become the machines that will enter
the buildings, erect support structures and prevent it from collapsing. Fig 3.5(a) and 3.5(b) below
show how a very large shape changing robot can enter a building through a narrow window and
rebuild itself one on the other side.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 22 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

Fig.3.5 (b)

3.6 SPACE EXPLORATION

NASA, ESA and a few other space organizations are planning to go into space in a big
way using the International Space Station (ISS) at an astonishing cost of $60+ billion. We do
call on NASA and ESA senior staff to introduce our technology into their systems but due to
the politics of low cost of this technology, it is turning into a big problem. Fractal robotics
technology on demonstration here will probably reduce costs to $100 million for space stations
assembled under total automation and the technology comes with self-repair which is
absolutely critical for space faring systems.
The recent loss of WIRE satellite illustrate the requirements of self-repair very
graphically. WIRE lost a sun shield, and tumbled out of control as coolant got heated and
evaporated. It could have been avoided if it had a minimal fractal robot inside it (acting as
structural supports) as that could have changed shape and formed into a Sun shield in the event
of this totally unpredictable accident. $70 million gone into utter waste that could have been
saved by a fractal robot costing $100,000 built with nothing more than coils, magnets and some
microcontrollers.
A 50% operational girder articulation system for assembling large structures under total
automation as illustrated in animated figure below is already available for demonstrations.
Fractal digital matter control programs have turned out to be far more important to space
technology than anyone has ever predicted.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 23 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017
Digital Matter Control and fractal robot concepts can be pitted against technologies
from big lab and ad-hoc methods are no longer competitive with infinitely more capable fractal
methods. There are many other concepts and applications for fractal technologies that are under
way. Whether you are planning to build and/or are researching the next generation of space
station technology, a moon base, a Mars exploring multi-terrain vehicle, a Genesis Device for
terraforming planets, asteroid terraforming systems for construction of giant space ships and
space resorts or constructing the next generation of payload delivery systems, you can't afford
to be out of the picture. What's on offer here is everything that space engineers have dreamt
about and more such as 100% automation in assembly, self-repair, reconfiguring space craft
etc.. Look at project Moon Base Omega to get a glimpse of how much space access is going
to change in the coming decades. We believe people don't need to go to Mars just yet to
discover life - instead we want a fractal robot to go to Mars and take with it an Electron
Microscope to perform all the vital research and sample gathering in-situ.
You will probably agree that nothing of what you have heard or understood here had
been told to you through the media, university degree courses, space science schooling or your
local space society - despite the sheer scale of the advances reported here. Thats how new this
technology is! Now that we have done the task of opening your eyes its your turn to spread
the message and lobby the powers that be, from universities to government, to re-claim space
science by putting real science back into space programs so that a new chapter in space access
can once again begin in earnest.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 24 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

CHAPTER 4

LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSION

4.1 LIMITATIONS

Technology is still in infancy

Current cost is very high ($1000 per cube for the 1st generation of cubes, after which
it will reduce to $100 or so).

Needs very precise & flexible controlling software.

4.2 CONCLUSION
It may take about 4-5 years for this technology to be introduced and tried out all over
the world. But once the first step is taken and its advantages well understood it will not take
much time for it to be used in our everyday life. Using Fractal Robots will help in saving
economy; time etc and they can be used even for the most sensitive tasks. Also the raw
materials needed are cheap, making it affordable for developing nations also. This promises to
revolutionize technology in a way that has never been witnessed before.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 25 Department of EEE

Fractal Robots Seminar 2017

REFERENCE

[1] Ar ifmohammad Attar, Loukik Kulkarni & S. G. Bhatwadekar, "Fractal Robots

Smart Future of Manufacturing Industry, IJTARME, vol. 2, pp.103-105, 2013.

[2] Tom Cnops, Zhenyu Gan, and C. David Remy, The Basin of Attraction for Running
Robots: Fractals, Multistep Trajectories, and the Choice of Control International
Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1586-1591, 2015.

[3] Wang gang, and Maji, "Fractal Analysis to the Robot during the Application of
Defect Detection," IEEE, vol. 10, pp. 656 - 658, 2010.

[4] Yoshio Mizugaki,Masafumi Zakamoto and Keisuke Kamijo, "Fractal Path

Application in a Metal Mold Polishing Robot System," IEEE, pp.431-436,1991.

[5] Yasuyoshi Yokokohji, Satoshi Chaen and Tsuneo Yoshikawa, "Evaluation of

Traversability of Wheeled Mobile Robots on Uneven Terrains by Fractal Terrain
Model," Proceedings Of the 2004 IEEE international Conference on Robotics 6
Automation New Orleans. LA, pp.2183-2188, 2004.

Jyothi Engineering College, Cheruthuruthy 26 Department of EEE