Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Connectivity Element
Special thanks to Branden Born and Rachel Berney, the professors of CEP 460.
Special thanks to Jenna Leonard and Jennifer Davison, the Livable City Year Program Managers.
In the fall of 2016, students from the Community, Environment and Planning Department at
the University of Washington were asked to draft a set of recommendations to be
implemented into a connectivity element for the City of Auburns Comprehensive Plan. After
completing a series of case studies that analyzed the connectivity elements and supporting
documents of other mid-size cities, determining the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities,
and threats of the region, and outlining and conducting over 49 surveys of Auburn residents,
the Auburn Connectivity Consulting Team (ACC) was able to successfully bring forward a set
of eleven recommendations for the city addressing the issues surrounding physical, social,
and economic connectivity. The recommendations are as follows:
The Connectivity Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan requires significant community
engagement in order to accurately identify the area(s) of need/interest and proactively
formulate related solutions. To do this, the Connectivity Element, and congruent public
participation, was approached in 5 stages: a literature review, survey formation, field
observations, synthesis and a written deliverable.
The literature review and background information helped to inform this project of the history
of Auburn. It also answered the key question: what is connectivity? From these case studies,
research regarding the history of Auburn and the original scope of work from the City the
projects scope of work was formed with a problem assessment, project goals, timeline and
initial set of questions to answer. These questions were later narrowed down and answered
in the policy recommendations.
In addition, the Connectivity Consulting Team working on this project collaborated with
Auburn City staff for an initial city tour, and informational meeting. Then separately, they
viewed twenty four community hotspots, identified by city staff, and took observations. Next,
all the information from these two portions of the project was taken into consideration and
synthesized into one community survey.
After the surveying was completed, the Auburn Connectivity Consulting Team and the
Placemaking Consulting team collaborated once again to synthesize all the data collected
and create a usable document which each team could utilize to produce informed policy
recommendations. During this time, ArcGIS was also used to create informational maps of
the restaurant index in Auburn, the health and social assets within the community and the
routes of public transportation. The analysis and maps were then used to inform the final
written report.
This report is the final culmination of the connectivity research and work that took place in
the City of Auburn from September of 2016 to December 2016. Following are asset maps,
synthesis of the survey data and informed policy/activity recommendations formulated by
the Connectivity Consulting Team to help Auburn initiate a Connectivity Element within their
Comprehensive Plan and policies.
Physical Connectivity takes shape in Auburn in the form of increased non-motorized travel,
as well as an emphasis on an efficient and welcoming multimodal transit system. Social
connectivity recognizes the opportunity to revitalize Downtown as the Heart of Auburn, as
well as preserve the citys existing asset and qualities. Economic connectivity values long-
term economic growth in the form of increased industrial and commercial development, and
robust employment opportunities.
Many of the elements in Auburns Comprehensive Plan address the connectivity goals
identified in case studies but lack a formal strategic element that synthesized desired
outcomes. Auburns Community Visions Plan, Transportation and Economic Development
Elements clearly define a desire for walkable neighborhoods, uncongested streets, improved
public transit service, and better connected neighborhoods and facilities. It emphasizes the
inclusion and celebration of a diverse multicultural, and multi-generational population.
During the early stages of the project, research was often inconclusive when searching
explicitly for connectivity elements in cities outside of Auburn. Connectivity
recommendations and policies could be commonly found within Transportation Elements
but their goals were not explicit. To move this project forward and to define connectivity
before surveying, the Auburn Connectivity Consulting Team drew information from six plans
to create the definition of connectivity. Physical Infrastructure was emphasized the most
across plans with social and economic benefits following close behind. Focus on these three
elements would then promote economic growth and assist the population. It was also
theorized that connectivity based on physical infrastructure would positively create healthier
and safer cohesive cities and connect people locally and regionally to amenities and services.
Beavertons Transportation Element of their Comprehensive Plan focuses primarily on the idea
that physical connectivity boosts social and economic growth. This plan also emphasizes the
difference between connectivity and capacity. Similarly to Auburn, Beaverton is expected to
continue to grow in population as more people move from rural to urban lifestyles. To properly
address this need the city wants to ensure that they have a multimodal system that connects the
encompassed neighborhoods and does not lack or exceed capacity demands.
In order to ensure persistent connectivity in the future, Beaverton wants to emphasize the
connections between collector streets to make it easier for people using all modes of
transportation to move through the area without the use of larger through arterials.
Pedestrian and non-motorized forms of transportation are also of great importance.
Mt. Lebanon Comprehensive Plan Update: Elevating Connectivity for Pedestrians and
Cyclists
This update to Mt. Lebanons Comprehensive Plan aims to ensure that pedestrians have safe
and efficient routes through the city and to enhance bicyclist safety. To write this plan, the
city performed Road Safety Audits to evaluate how and where changes needed to be made
in order to best achieve these goals. They then identified intersections where two or more
crashes occurred and looked at how they could provide short term mitigation, like painting
crosswalks and trimming trees, and long term mitigation for each site.
This Connectivity Element is clearly focused on safety issues within Mt. Lebanons pre-
existing physical infrastructure. Auburn could potentially use this plan to model a similar
study performed at some of their most dangerous intersections. Additionally, hey could use
some of the short and long term mitigations to inform any changes made to intersections.
The West Melbourne Plan looks specifically at the use of multi-modal transportation as way
to ensure land development practices and transportation projects promote community
connectivity.
The sections of West Melbournes Transportation Elements specific to each area of focus
give more detail of how to feasibly execute a connectivity element. In particular, they
outline finance strategies such as impact fees, tax increment findings, federal and state
funds and alternative funding processes that could be used. This element is very much an
attempt to make sure that connectivity is not lost during the planning process in the
municipality.
Cars are the primary mode of transportation in Auburn with 80% of respondents saying they
travel by car. This was followed by the bus with 30%, walking with 12.5%, Sounder train with
5%, and only 2.5% of respondents identified biking. Respondents were allowed to give
multiple answers, which is why the percentages equal more than 100%. People often
mentioned the infrequency of bus service and the hills as reasons for not busing or biking
respectively.
61% of respondents answered yes to this question, adding that driving is the most viable way
to get between neighborhoods. Alternatively, 24% felt it was difficult to get between
neighborhoods, expressing that the wide spread of the neighborhoods, traffic congestion,
frequency of traffic lights, and the hills being some of the reasons why. The last 15% reported
that the connectivity between neighborhoods was okay, not having a strong opinion for
either.
In addition to getting an idea about how residents felt about connectivity between
neighborhoods, ease of getting downtown was another important question.
- 68% of participants said that it was easy to get downtown from their neighborhood.
- 18% of participants said it was not easy to get downtown.
- 14% of participants did not feel strongly one way or another
Many respondents go downtown to make transportation connections, which is one reason
that there may be a perception of the city center being better connected. A few responders
said they go downtown about once a week to shop. Parking was not cited as being an
issue/barrier to traveling downtown.
Do you shop, run errands, or eat out in Auburn? If yes, what neighborhood(s) do you
go to?
Only 13% of respondents stated that they dont shop in Auburn. The remaining 87% do at
least part of their shopping in Auburn. Downtown, Safeway, and Fred Meyer were the most
frequently mentioned locations. Outside of Auburn, Kent and Covington were the
surrounding cities that participants go to do their shopping most, expressing that there is a
larger variety of restaurants and retail shops compared to those of Auburn.
There was a variety of responses for this particular question that touched on all three aspects
of connectivity. Within the physical category, respondents were interested in seeing an
improvement in the quality of roads and sidewalks, more street/walkway lighting, and a
reduction in traffic. More business growth and less section 8 housing was mentioned
relating to economic connectivity. There were several suggestions having to do with the
social aspect, including more activities and after school programs for children. Improving
emergency services, policing, and dealing with drug issues was one important issue that was
raised a number of times, including better outreach to the homeless population.
When you are not at work, school, or home, how and where do you spend most of your
time?
The most popular responses in decreasing order were parks (17%), library (14%), sports
(11%), Kent, Outlet/Super Mall, and Seattle (8%). People who said they spent their time in
Seattle or Kent tended to be younger with most respondents in their 20s and one in their
30s. The library was mentioned exclusively by minorities such as Native Americans, African
Americans and Latinos, whereas parks were not correlated with any age or racial
demographic.
What are some of the first things that come to your mind when you think of Auburn?
People thought of traffic, nice and quiet the most with both of those being mentioned by
10% of respondents. Diverse, boring, good, and Green River College were all mentioned 8%
of the time. While conducting the survey several people blamed problems in Auburn on the
increase in minority groups in the community in ways that were deemed inappropriate for
publication, therefore demographic issues was developed as a shorthand for cataloging
such responses. This happened in 8% of responses as well. Physical changes to Auburn
indicating growth were mentioned by 5% of respondents.
The majority of respondents reported that they did not participate in Auburn-wide events
mostly because they had no knowledge of them, of those, many expressed interest in
attending events had they known about them. Of the few respondents who said they have
attended city events, there was mention that they felt most of the events were geared
towards kids, or that they only attend events for their kids. The Art Center or Auburn Ave
Theatre and Les Grove Park were a few of the events that really stuck out to some people.
This question was rather dependent upon age. Below is a breakdown of three different age
groups and their distinct response.
20s - Almost every respondent wanted more dining and shopping options.
30s - Along with restaurants and a desire for filled retail space, they also have a desire for
more community events both family oriented and ones that are more all-encompassing of
the population
40 and up - Want to see less crime, and more opportunities for community clean ups
Figure 1 Figure 2
Strengths
Weaknesses
Upon surveying 49 Auburn residents, the Connectivity Consulting team found that
only 12% used walking as a mode of transportation. Respondents questioned why
they wouldnt drive. Driving and parking are convenient for the 30 sq. miles of
Auburn. Many people opt and even prefer to drive to the neighboring cities of Kent,
Covington and Federal way. If pedestrian transportation is made appealing and
possible, this may deter some leakage into other cities for shopping or
entertainment.
Sidewalks are a key way to encourage more walking throughout the city. The quote
below touches on the discomfort people have when using Auburns arterial
sidewalks.
This image depicts Auburn Way S near D St SE. If a turning lane is required we recommend a road reduction to one
lane and a turning lane, to maintain an expanded sidewalk.
The city of Auburn has created the map below as a plan for trail expansion. The
yellow lines are current trails and the dotted yellow signifies trails to be built. The
Lakeland Hills Trail network is a nearly complete example within Lakeland Hills as to
what a potential trail expansion across Auburn may look like.
Dykstra Park connecting to Isaac Evans Park is another good example as to how two
parks can creatively connect to each other. The city has proposed in the map below
that Dykstra be the point of a trailhead, and the consulting team backs that. The
Connectivity Consulting Team recommends a developed, wheelchair accessible and
bike friendly trail along the West side of the Green River
Trail Network Auburns developing trail network provides local and regional
connections for both recreational use and commuting. Currently the only regional
trails that have been developed include the Interurban and portions of the Green
River and White River Trails. The Lakeland Hills Trail network provides connections
to neighborhood parks, community center, and to the City of Sumner via a tunnel
under the BNSF railway. Map 3-2 illustrates the existing and proposed trail network
within the City.
While many respondents were unaware of the entirety of Auburns public transit
options, the bus was the second most frequently indicated mode of transportation
from the survey with thirty percent of respondents saying they use the bus at least
some of the time. Most respondents who indicated they use transit or were
interested in transit were from Lea Hill and the valley neighborhoods.
For those who use the bus service the primary challenges to the use of transit is the
infrequency of service. Some residents mentioned crowded buses as a problem with
the system. Respondents who primarily drove indicated that inconvenience of the
transit system was their primary reason for not using it. Improvements to the local
bus service in Auburn is a crucial part of physically connecting the city.
- Work with King County Metro and Pierce Transit to make sure buses have the
adequate carrying capacity
- Work to increase frequency between Lea Hill and Downtown Auburn as well
as within the valley
- Increasing service on DART Route 910, and consider revising to regular fixed
route bus service
- Add stops to Pierce Transit Route 497 in the South Auburn neighborhood
The City of Auburn must take steps to provide a more functional and attractive
network for commuter cyclists, in addition to recreational cyclists (Comprehensive
Plan). At this juncture, the Citys bike lane infrastructure is sorely lacking. Much effort
and investment must be committed to the non-motorized transport system if it is to
be considered viable by Auburn residents. Such investments are prudent in the long
run, as [the] average protected bike lane sees bike counts increase 75 percent in its
first year alone (Monsere, 2014).
Planning a bike lane system is quite a momentous task and in light of time
constraints, our group elected to develop a system concept for the Lea Hill
Our proposed Lea Hill bike lane system begins at Auburn Station and parallels
Auburn Ave, 8th St NE, and Lea Hill Rd SE. Originally, we had planned the lane to
access Lea Hill proper by crossing the Green River via the 8th Street Bridge. Road
diets were drawn up to illustrate how the City might resurface the road to
accommodate the bike lane, however during our presentation we were informed
that the bridge will be replaced in its entirety by a new structure further up the river.
In light of this development, we have elected to draw up three development concepts
for the new bridge that integrate a bike lane. Our recommendations for the
remainder of the Lea Hill bike system concept remain intact and will be elaborated
upon.
Depending on the width of the bridge, there are several manners of integrating a bike lane
into the construction. We will begin our exploration by using the width of the current 8th
St bridge as a diving off point. At 47 in width, we assume the current construction is an
average sized suburban bridge and aim to create two alternative designs: one narrower
and one wider.
The above graphic depicts a bridge 47 wide- the same width as the current 8th St bridge, courtesy of StreetMix.net
The above graphic depicts a bridge 67 wide- 20 wider than the current 8th St bridge, courtesy of StreetMix.net
At 67, our wide concept for the replacement bridge features spacious bike lanes of 5
and sidewalks (!) of 6. There are four lanes of traffic, two in each direction and a center
divider of 1.5. The addition of street lights will likely be a welcome addition as well,
The above graphic depicts a bridge 37 wide- 10 narrower than the current 8th St bridge, courtesy of StreetMix.net
The 37 wide narrow concept is an unlikely scenario- yet the contingency is still viable. Two 10
wide drive lanes, two 5 bike lanes, and two rows of street lamps comprise the totality of the
concept. These three concepts display the ease in which bike lanes can be implemented in new
bridge designs. The construction of the replacement bridge must incorporate a bike lane if the
City of Auburn is serious about promoting non-motorized transport.
Along Lea Hill Rd SE, road diets can be utilized quite easily to integrate a bike lane. The road
benefits from very wide shoulders, dead space that can be activated to incorporate a bike lane.
This concept only requires a foot to be shaved from each drive lane to transform this 35 street
surface into a safe road for all modes of use (two 5 bike lanes, two 10 driving lanes).
It became clear to the ACC that many Auburn residents, particularly younger residents and
newcomers, are simply unknowledgeable of many of the communitys assets, which is
potentially a major cause of the leakage of economic activity to Kent and Covington.
Improved and additional signage, as well as other tactics of wayfinding, would encourage
residents to better utilize the entertainment and retail options that are central to Auburn.
Signs in neighborhoods, particularly those exterior to downtown, that read distances to
nearby community assets increase spatial awareness and signal to visitors, shoppers, and
even longtime residents all that Auburn has to offer.
Other strategies for wayfinding include a variety of design and placemaking practices (i.e.
naming neighborhoods or districts after distinct architectural or geographic features,
implementing interactive sidewalk designs, allowing public art installations that are
representative of a place, etcetera). The Auburn Placemaking Consulting Team builds on a
number of these strategies in their recommendations.
The ACC Team recommends extending Auburns summer farmers market to be year-round.
Survey responses repeatedly signaled both a lack of diversity in food options and a loss of
food commerce to nearby cities. An all-season or more frequent farmers market would fill
gaps in food variety, support local farmers and vendors, and guarantee cross-neighborhood
interfacing, which also bolsters efforts to improve social connectivity.
Survey responses show that Auburn has lost its economic-edge, primarily due to a lack of
attractive amenities that capitalize on the emerging majority age groups within the city. Many
of the survey respondents reported that [they] do shop outside of Auburn and when they
do, they tend to shop in Covington or find entertainment in Kent. But what is so attractive
in either of these neighboring cities, and how can Auburn create a better experience for
people shopping in Auburn?
Kent Station capitalizes on the opportunity to connect people directly to the center of Kents
In order to better provide for the needs of the consumer in the greater Auburn area, the ACC
Team recommends an extension of the Downtown Facade Improvement Program and
incorporation of new urbanist principles (walkability, mixed-use, diverse businesses, quality
architecture and urban design, human scale, and increased density). These practices could
be applied first to dense retail areas of Auburn. Auburn should look to attract businesses
that appeal to the sizeable 18-35 year old population. Respondents of the survey findings in
this age range recommend that these businesses enhance entertainment and selection
within Auburn. Some potential options may include a bowling alley, nightlife, or location for
spectator sport. For further research on what types of businesses to attract, the ACC Team
advises continued surveying by way of a mail-out postcard that links people to a 5-10 minute
online survey.
Homelessness and a lack of social services were often mentioned as concerns from
respondents. More social services was brought up by several people when asked what they
wanted to see in their community.
5.2 City events that engage people of all ages and celebrate Auburns growing
cultural diversity
Survey respondents identified a need for more inclusive community events, particularly
respondents in their 30s. They also recognized strong ties within cultural groups. These
cultural ties could be built off of to foster a more diverse range of events to bridge cultural
divides in the community.
A pre-existing event in Auburn that has potential for expansion and engagement is the Clean
Sweep that occurs on Earth Day. This event is advertised on the City of Auburns website as
the largest community volunteer effort in Auburn. According to the connectivity survey
responses, common themes from the forty plus age group were desire for less crime and
more opportunities for community cleanups. Expanding the Clean Sweep event into a
Auburns inhabitants also have great concerns about the food variety in the city. First there
are two to three main grocery shops within the city such as Safeway in downtown. The rest
are smaller shops with very limited options. Restaurants can be divided into two categories,
chain restaurants and local. While creating the map we discovered an almost equal ratio of
chain to local restaurants within the city, which is a first concern as chain restaurants lack
not only nutritious options, but also unique dining experiences. While analyzing the types of
restaurants the city has to offer, we found a substantial number of restaurants offering Asian
cuisine, such as teriyaki or pho, as well as many fast food or burger options. Respondents
found these restaurant options were lacking of quality and variety of food. Due to the lack
of variety, Auburn residents are eating in Kent.
There are an abundance of school options, all of which are distributed evenly throughout the city
and the different neighborhoods. The Green River Community College is a very unique place as
it attracts students from many different cities around Auburn as well as international students.
Students reported that they would like to be more connected to downtown. Some suggested that
the school could better advertise the citys events and organize commuting solutions to aid
students in getting to community events.
What are some of the first things that come to your mind when you
think of Auburn?(38 responses)
congested, hard to get around, peaceful, chill
Nice, fresh clean
Cool, better than where she use to live, lots of demographic issues
Renovating, great
Small,
Family, parks, traffic
farming, fresh produce, expanding
change after 20 years, bottom of the barrel, crime, no drive for modern convenience
quiet
hood, heroin, Green River College
Quiet, greenery
cozy place, decent transportation, place to live
Green River College
N/A
Depressing
N/A
wonderful in the past, not so much now (demographic change)
bored, not enough gathering space
Church, used to live here
out of the way
n/a
When you are not at work, school, or home, how and where do you
spend most of your time?(35 responses)
Just moved to Auburn so primarily at home or work
library
Library, or park on 28th
hiking
Home
Lea Hill
coach so spends times in the parks
Kids activities, football, theater, goes to parks a lot
Kent, gym
Spends time in Seattle
Kent/Federal Way with friends
Goes to Game Farm Park to play disc golf
Covington to shop
Outside Auburn in Kent or Federal Way
Seattle
I spend my time at home.
park playing soccer
home
parks, fishing in the green river
by Green River
Goes to Seattle
I hang out at home, there is not much to do
Sumner and Puyallup
yard
Auburn
lacking if you don't gamble or race horses, Mall remodeled, parks are nice but only Auburn residents use
it. Needs central attraction
restaurant
Library
Senior center, Library
supermall
disc golf
with kids, goes to library
hangout, party
Outlet Collection & Movies
hangout on weekends
comments...(13 responses)
Seattle is an hour bus ride away
20 minute walk
but theres traffic
yes, bus makes it easy to get downtown, and to downtown Seattle
traffic is bad
Goes Downtown often
Goes to downtown Auburn on weekends
Goes downtown for commuting
25 minutes by bus. Goes shopping once a week
Lots of traffic
3 mins to downtown, 5 mins to trains station
takes the bus
parking is easy