Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PTMP
2
Steps In Developing A Transport Master Plan
PRELIMINARY
CONCEPTUAL FEASIBILITY
1 IDEA 2 STUDY 3 STUDY 4 ENGINEERING
DESIGN
5 TMP
4
Penang Forums Talk
TRAM BRT
5
Current Scenario: Penangs Congested Roads
7
Are Penang Roads Spacious Enough For Trams?
9
Can FIZ/ Business Areas Cope With Road Closures?
Long period of disruption to local communities during construction:
ROAD CLOSURES (> 2 years) to allow for utilities relocations
Extend construction 6 TO 8 YEARS
11
Trams Cannot Be Built Without Utilities Relocation
2.5m 3.5m 3.35m 3.35m 2.2m
Walkway Lane 1 Tram Lane 1 Tram Lane 2
6.7m TRAM LANES
Excavation
15
Tram & LRT Systems - Use LRV As Rolling Stock
LRT SYSTEM = LRV (RUNNING ON ELEVATED STRUCTURE)
16
Cost Escalation? - Apple vs Orange
17
LRT For Komtar-Penang Airport Corridor.
18
Why LRT For Komtar-Penang Airport Corridor?
LRT system is required because:
The corridor requires ELEVATED system.
Forms high-capacity MAIN N-S BACKBONE connecting Komtar direct to
the airport cater for high ridership.
Links MUST-GO POINTS primary industrial, commercial & residential
hubs.
It will CONNECT TO SEBERANG PERAI in future.
Can be served by SYSTEMATIC FEEDER BUS NETWORK within 3km
radius to ferry commuters to and from stations (last mile).
20
Alignment Selection
MATRIX OF FACTORS for optimum alignment
selection carried out by professional Malaysian
engineering consultants
21
TRAFFIC CONFLICTS @ IJM DEVELOPMENT
2-WAY TRAM
OUTGOING TRAFFIC
BEFORE AFTER
TRAM
TRAM
ACCESS FOR IJM ACCESS FOR IJM
DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT
SIGNALISED
T-JUNCTION 22
TRAFFIC CONFLICTS & LANE CLOSURE @ SPICE
SPICE
TURNING TRAFFIC
JALAN MAHSURI
2-WAY TRAM
2 LANES CLOSED
OUTGOING TRAFFIC
PERSIARAN MAHSURI
BEFORE AFTER
TRAM STOP
TRAM
TRAM
23
Komtar-Penang Airport Corridor - TRAMS
Lane Closure & Parking Removal
ALONG FIZ STRETCH = 2KM
Example Scenario:
FIZ SOUTH STATION
Lane reduction
Side parking removed
Side Side
Fence
Parking Fence Fence
Parking
Fence
RENESAS
BOSCH
2 lanes service road with Divider Traffic lane Divider Traffic lane Divider One Lane Service Road
Side Parking 6.4 m 11.3 m 2.6 m 10.9 m 2.4 m with Side Parking
11.1 m 7.1 m
2 lanes service road with 5.7 m Tram Lane Tram Stop Tram Lane 1.5 m 3.0 m 5.0 m Note: No drop-
Traffic lane Traffic lane
Side Parking 3.65 m Walkway Space One Lane off / lay-by areas
7.6 m 3.0 m 3.65 m 7.6 m
11.1 m for Service Road
FIZ SOUTH Link Bridge
STATION
24
BURMAH ROAD - EXISTING
3 TRTAFFIC LANES
2-storey shop
Chinese Temple
Car Park
Monorail
1 lane reduction
for monorail piers
2-storey shop
Chinese Temple
Car Park
2 lanes carriageway 26
BURMAH ROAD WITH TRAM
2 lanes reduction
for Tram way
Tram
2-storey shop
Chinese Temple
Car Park
1 lane carriageway 27
Penang Needs
Strategic Bypass Highway.
28
Highways Still Needed - PIL 1 Economically Viable
40% public transport mode shift CANNOT HAPPEN OVERNIGHT NEEDS
TO BE ENCOURAGED PROGRESSIVELY.
Eg. Full electronic tolling took >25 years to implement in Klang Valley.
PTMPs motto: Moving People, Not Cars applicable to States 40% public
transport mode share target by the year 2030.
HIGHWAYS STILL NEEDED to cater for the 60% PRIVATE VEHICLES.
29
PIL 1 Crucial To Relieve Traffic
CURRENT (Without PIL 1) FUTURE (With PIL 1)
LCE now heavily congested Alternative to LCE for traffic relief
STATE
TMP
(PHASE 1)
Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu (LCE) Expressway is the ONLY With the Pan Island Link 1 (PIL 1) Highway,
north-south highway on Penang Island with no vehicles may BYPASS LCE and travel DIRECTLY
alternative. from Airport/ 2nd Bridge to Komtar/ Gurney Drive.
30
Other Halcrow Recommendations.
31
What Happened to Halcrows TMP Recommendations?
Penang Transport Master Plan (PTMP) report by Halcrow (Short term up to
2030) was adopted as Penang State Governments official document on 25
March 2013.
Based on the Halcrow's recommendations, State Government had come out
with several project as per the study, which included:
3 MAJOR HIGHWAYS & UNDERSEA TUNNEL constructed by Zenith-
BUCG
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN progressively done by MBPP
PENANG ACCESSIBILITY ACTION GROUP (PAAG) to look into the
accessibility improvement plan
The RFP called by the Penang State Gov. requested for a PDP MODEL TO
IMPLEMENT THE PENANG TMP, INCLUDING A FUNDING MODEL.
It also allowed proponents to propose an ALTERNATIVE TMP.
All the short-term, long-term including cost effective measures
recommended by Halcrow were carried out by State Gov. in a holistic way.
32
Role of PDP.
33
What is a PDP?
The PDP has the ability to step-in to rescue the project in the event of
non-performing WPCs due to its own skill and experience as a
contractor.
34
Benefits of PDP Model
The PDP ensures the successful delivery of all of the project components within
time and budget, in accordance with the design and specifications approved by
the State Gov. SINGLE POINT ACCOUNTABILITY
Key benefits:
PDP assumes all design, construction & integration risks of the project
PDP fees will be reduced if project outcomes is not met (Pain-Gain System)
PDP is responsible in obtaining the necessary licenses & approvals
The PDP ensures the implementation from top to toe of the entire delivery
process, including:
Feasibility & EIA studies
Regulatory Approvals (DEIA, SPAD & NPPC approvals)
Design development, engineering design & specifications for construction
Land acquisition
Construction procurement by tender
Construction approvals (EMP, utilities relocations and traffic diversions etc.)
Managing and coordinating the construction including supervision
Interface management between contractors (minimise potential for claims & cost overruns)
Managing the testing & commissioning process 35
36
Global Best Practices PDP Used For Complex Projects
Project Crossrail Project, London London Olympics 2012 New Doha International Korea High Speed Rail
(duration)
(2009-2017) (2006 2012) Airport (NDIA), (2003 2011) (1991 - 2002)
Value (USD
bil)
12 10 15 16
Crossrail Ltd Olympic Delivery Authority Qatar Civil Aviation Authority & Korea High Speed Rail
Client (subsidiary of TfL) (ODA) NDIA Steering Committee Construction Authority (KHRC)
PDP Bechtel CLM Consortium Overseas Bechtel International Bechtel
(CHRM Hill, Laing ORourke & Mace)
PDPs role & Bechtel as Project Delivery CLM as Delivery Partner Overseas Bechtel International Bechtel provided project
relation- Partner (PDP), manages the supports ODA in managing the (OBI) provides engineering, management services, working
ship with safe delivery of the central cost & delivery of the project management, & with KHRC as part of an
GoM tunnel section to time, cost construction programme construction management Integrated Project
and quality. services Management Organization
Contracts will be let by the
The central tunnel section is ODA, which will also retain The project was sub-divided (IPMO) that guides project
to be designed and ownership of approval into 60 Construction Packages design & construction
constructed through a number processes & financial syst. Work includes design
of contracts CLM delivers parcels of ODAs management, railway
The PDP is responsible for the work; pre-approving all tasks operations, quality control,
procurement and management and the resources allocated safety, and cost & schedule
of contracts & for managing all for that task prior to the work management.
the consequent interfaces, starting Helped the team evaluate
reporting to the Crossrail Ltd. railway technologies & applied
Profit earned if CLM hits KPI
Implementation Director and its global knowledge of
set by ODA
his team procurement cycles & contract
management.
TfL Board Delegation paper KHSR project profile
Source CLM s media briefing note NDIA Project Profile
www.bechtel.com Bechtel briefs April 2001
36
PTMP FUNDING MODEL
37
Penang South Reclamation
Reclaimed land and PTMP components BELONG SOLELY TO THE STATE
GOVERNMENT.
Proceeds from SALE OF RECLAIMED LAND VIA PUBLIC AUCTION by the State
Government will be used to fund PTMP components.
Implementation of each PTMP component (whether rail or road) depends on:
ECONOMIC VIABILITY
PTMP developed in phases
FUND AVAILABILITY
Each PTMP component will be tendered out via OPEN TENDER.
38
LRT Sustainable Model
BAYAN LEPAS LRT NOTE:
CAPEX OPEX
FUNDING 1. Build-Operate-Transfer
(BOT) Model for Ampang/
Reclamation - Kelana Jaya LRT and KL
Monorail are NOT
Fare Revenue - SUITABLE revenue has
to support Capex & Opex.
Non-Fare Revenue
(TOD)
- 2. Initial projected ridership &
revenue had to be HIGH to
Examples of Public-Private Partnership be financially feasible
Model: Bangkok (Thailand) and Singapore resulting in shortfall.
39
Penangs Future
PENANG SOUTH RECLAMATION Funding Model
1. A catalyst for ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION that is MOST CRUCIAL to take
Penang to the next level.
2. Resolves land and transport issues in ONE MOVE to further enhance Penangs
liveability.
3. It is the key to UNLOCKING THE FUTURE that will benefit Penangs future
generations.
40
Transformative Development
A New Chapter For Penang
New reclaimed land from PSR is Penangs answer for:
GREENER environment
SUSTAINABLE & COMPETITIVE ECONOMY
Shortage of SKILLED LABOUR
Housing AFFORDABILITY
BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE for all Penangites
Future TRAM LINE
41
THANK YOU
42