IN THE COURT OF FAMILY AND CIVIL JUDGE SUKKUR

Family Suit No.28 of 2013

Mst. Shabana D/o Iqbal Ahmed, Mulsim,

Lady, Memon by caste, R/o Memon Mohalla
Near Teer Chowk, Bhutta Road, SukkurPlaintiff
V E R S U S
Waqar Ahmed S/o Khalid Ahmed, Muslim,
Adult Memon by caste, R/o Memon Mohalla
Rohri, District Sukkur .Defendnat.

Cross Examination of the Deposition on the Iqbal Ahmed S/o

Jan Muhammad by caste Memon.

Dated.13-08-2013
Recalled and reaffirmed on oath.
Cross to Mr.Saleh Bhutto Advocate for Defendant.

This marriage was arrange marriage. It is fact that the

parents of defendant were also present in this marriage. It
is correct to suggest that all the witness and advocate of
Nikha are my relatives. It is fact that the witness of
defendant side are not mention in the Nikhanama. I
voluntarily say that the brother of defendant were present
at the time of Nikah. I do not number the exict date of this
marriage but in the month of December 2008 the Nikha Khawan
Qamarddin had recited the Nikha. I am uneducated. It is
correct to suggest that the signature of Nikha khawan
liaquat Ali is written in the Nikhanama. It is correct to
suggest that the some receipt of dower articles is mention
the name of shop keeper Book number and receipt number and
the name of puncher. It is correct to suggest that in the
Para No.6 in may affidavit-in-evidence which are all the
contents true and correct. It is correct suggest that trims
and condition of Para No.16 and 17 in Nikhanama are correct.
After the marriage of Mst. Shabana resided in the rented
house. It is incorrect to suggest that plaintiff left the
house of defendant she did not bring any dowry articles. I
take one original copy of Nikhanama. It is correct to
suggest I have not produce the original copy of Nikhanama. I
can not say whether the over writing in Nikhanama is
correct. It is incorrect to suggest that I did not change
the document. () . It is correct to suggest that I
am deposing falsely.
No. Re. SRO & Ac
Sd/-
Family Judge Sukkur
 IN THE COURT OF FAMILY AND CIVIL JUDGE SUKKUR
Family Suit No.28 of 2013

Mst. Shabana D/o Iqbal Ahmed, Mulsim,

Lady, Memon by caste, R/o Memon Mohalla
Near Teer Chowk, Bhutta Road, SukkurPlaintiff

V E R S U S

Waqar Ahmed S/o Khalid Ahmed, Muslim,

Adult Memon by caste, R/o Memon Mohalla
Rohri, District Sukkur .Defendnat.

Cross Examination of the Deposition on the Mst. Shabana D/o

Iqbal Ahmed by caste Memon.

Dated.13-08-2013
Recalled and reaffirmed on oath.
Cross to Mr.Saleh Bhutto Advocate for Defendant.

It is correct to suggest that I am educated up to 9 th

class. My marriage has been arranged, on 27 December 2008 at
Sukkur. It is correct to suggest that the parents of
defendant namely Wazeer Ahmed attended the marriage. It is
fact that the name of witness Nadeem is not mention in
Nikhanama. It is fact that the name of( ) Qamarddin
is mention in the column No.23, but it is has not been
signed Qamarddin () . It is fact that I have not
produced the original Nikhanama. It is correct to suggest
that I have no produced the original receipts of dowry
articles. It is fact that the receipt of dowry articles at
Annexure B in which not mention the number and book
number. It is correct to suggest that the receipt at
Annexure B (i) is not mention the receipt number and book
number. It is fact that the name of purchaser is not mention
at Annexure B(2). It is fact that the receipt at Annexure
B(3) is not mention the name of purchaser and the name of
shop keeper and the date of purchaser is mention after the
date of marriage. It is fact that the receipt of Annexure
B(4) is not mention the name of purchaser and the name of
shop keeper is mention but the receipt number is not
mention. It is fact that the receipt of Annexure B (5) and B
(6) are not mention the name of purchaser no receipt number
and no book number. It is fact that the receipt of Annexure
B(7) to (9) are mention after the date of marriage. It is
fact that the receipt of Anext B(8) is shown only
guaranty card. It is incorrect to
suggest that the writing of column No. 16 of the Nikhanama
is different. It is fact that I have mention in my
affidavit-in-evidence at Para 07 which are true and
correct. It is fact that I have mention in my Para No. 07
also correct. It is fact that I have mention in my Nikhanama
paras16,17 are also correct. It is incorrect to suggest that
I did not resides with Mazhar Odhano at Sukkur. It is
incorrect to suggest that after the marriage I resides with
my husband in same house. Therefore after passing 4/5 months
my husband maltreated me thereafter I started residing with
my parents. It is incorrect to suggest thereafter I again
started residing with defendant in the house of Umeed Ali
Ansari, by taking all the dowry article there and thereafter
I took all the dowry articles to my present house. It is
fact that I patched up with my husband therefore I resides
with the defendant parents. It is fact that I did not reside
in rented house. It is incorrect to suggest that the copy of
Nikhanama as Annexure A filed by me false and fabricated.
It is incorrect to suggest that I am deposing falsely.
No. Re. SRO & Ac
Sd/-
Family Judge Sukkur