Emas - Efpc Stage 1 Design Package

REVISION C
MARCH 30, 2017
STAGE 1 DESIGN PACKAGE

DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OF MARS LANDER/ROVER
PACKAGE INFORMATION
This package is addressed to the client, EMPACT, and consists of the completed design of the
requested Mars rover vehicle. This document contains: Drawings, Tender Evaluaon Criteria,
Risk Management Plan, Specicaons and Gant Chart. All components of the design package
are the work of E.M.A.S group members.
Brody Mellberg
Ben Cook
Fardeen Nishad
Sithu Win Than
Cody Lee
CLIENT: EMPACT
TABLE OF DOCUMENTS
Drawing Package Revision C............................................................................................................... 1
Design Specification Revision B .......................................................................................................... 2
Risk Management Plan Revision B ..................................................................................................... 3
Tender Evaluation Criteria Revision B ................................................................................................ 4
Project Schedule (Gantt Chart) Revision B ......................................................................................... 5
Stage 1 Design Package

REVISION C
MARCH 30, 2017
DRAWING PACKAGE
CLIENT: EMPACT
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
The drawings contain all necessary illustraons, dimensions and specicaons of the E.M.A.S
Mars Rover. This document is the work of Ben Cook with the assistance of E.M.A.S group
members.
Ben Cook
ELON MUSK APPRECIATION SOCIETY
TABLE OF DRAWINGS
MR01-BC|01 General Arrangement & 3D Perspective View .............................................................. 1
MR01-BC|02 Exploded View .............................................................................................................. 2
MR01-BC|03 Plan View ...................................................................................................................... 3
MR01-BC|04 Side Elevation ............................................................................................................... 4
MR01-BC|05 Front Elevation ............................................................................................................. 5
MR01-BC|06 Section A - Longitudinal Section ................................................................................... 6
MR01-BC|07 Detail 1 - 3D Printed Wheel Detail ................................................................................ 7
Drawing Package
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: NTS
Client: EMPACT
Project: MARS LANDER/ROVER

C 24.03.2017 BC SYY REVISED WHEELS AND AXLES
I I
B 17.03.2017 BC SYY ADDED CHASSIS OPENING FOR CARGO Sheet: Rev:
A 14.03.2017 BC SYY PRELIMINARY ISSUE
Title: MUSK.E V3 E.M.A.S.
ELON MUSK
01 of 07
GENERAL ARRANGEMENT &
REV DATE PREPARED CHECKED DESCRIPTION APPRECIATION Dwg No:
REVISIONS
3D PERSPECTIVE VIEW SOCIETY MR01-BC C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
BILL OF MATERIALS
ITEM DESCRIPTION Length Qty
5 90mm PVC Storm Pipe - Chassis
1 295mm 1
A A
5
2 8mm or 16" Threaded Rod - Axles 200mm 2
5
3 8mm or 16 " Lock Nuts - 4
5
4 8mm or 16" Plain Nuts - 4
5 3D Printed Wheels - 4
3
1
B B
4
C C
D D
4 3
E E
4
F 3 F
G G
H H
5
Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: NTS
Client: EMPACT

I I
ELON MUSK
02 of 07
EXPLODED VIEW
REVISIONS
BILL OF MATERIALS SOCIETY MR01-BC C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A A
B B
15 115 10
C C
20
D D
A 30 70
06
E E
20
Approx. Radius 50
F F
G G
H H
PLAN VIEW
Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: 1:1
Client: EMPACT

I I
ELON MUSK
03 of 07
PLAN VIEW
REVISIONS
CHASSIS DIMENSIONS SOCIETY MR01-BC C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A A
B B
1
07
C C
D D
E E
F F
G
235 G
H H
SIDE ELEVATION
Client: EMPACT

I I
ELON MUSK
04 of 07
SIDE ELEVATION
REVISIONS
WHEEL BASE DIMENSIONS SOCIETY MR01-BC C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A A
B B
C C
45.5
D D
E E
45.5
F F
94
198
G 200 G
H H
FRONT ELEVATION
Client: EMPACT

I I
ELON MUSK
05 of 07
FRONT ELEVATION
REVISIONS
AXLE DIMENSIONS SOCIETY MR01-BC C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A A
B B
295
C C
45.5
D D
8 AXLE 8 AXLE
10 HOLE 10 HOLE
30 30
E E
45.5
F F
SECTION - A
G G
H H
Client: EMPACT

I I
ELON MUSK
06 of 07
LONGITUDINAL SECTION A
REVISIONS
CHASSIS DIMENSIONS SOCIETY MR01-BC C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A A
60 TYP
B B
110
C C
D 7.5 D
10
E E
29 36
F F
G G
H H
DETAIL - 1 SIDE VIEW

NOTES: Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: 2:1
1. INFILL - 10%
2. LAYER THICKNESS - 0.25mm Client: EMPACT
3. TOP AND BOTTOM THICKNESS - 6 LAYERS
4. WALL THICKNESS - 2 NOZZLE DIAMETERS C 24.03.2017 BC SYY REVISED WHEELS AND AXLES
I I
5. PRINT TEMPERATURE - 230C B 17.03.2017 BC SYY ADDED CHASSIS OPENING FOR CARGO Sheet: Rev:
ELON MUSK
07 of 07
3D PRINTED WHEEL DETAIL
REVISIONS
WHEEL DIMENSIONS SOCIETY MR01-BC C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
REVISION B
MARCH 30, 2017
DESIGN SPECIFICATION
CLIENT: EMPACT
The specicaons contain all instrucons necessary for the correct, safe and sasfactory
assembly of the E.M.A.S Mars Rover. In addion to this, the document contains a list and bill of
all required materials. This document is the work of Sithu Win Than with the assistance of
E.M.A.S group members.
Sithu Win Than

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Materials Required ....................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Bill of Materials ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.2. List of Tools ........................................................................................................................... 1
Method ......................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1. Chassis PVC Pipe................................................................................................................. 2
2.2. Axles Threaded Rod............................................................................................................ 2
2.3. Wheels 3D Printed ............................................................................................................. 3
2.4. Musk.E Mars Rover Assembly ............................................................................................ 3
1. MATERIALS REQUIRED
1.1. BILL OF MATERIALS
Item Quanty Cost Supplier Purpose
3D prinng 104.0 grams $3.12 Curn 3D prinng Wheels

lament (ABS ($0.03 per gram) lab
plasc)
Threaded rod 400mm length $2.43 Bunnings Axle

5/16 (2x 200mm) (24 length)
Lock nuts 5/16 4 nuts $3.21 Bunnings Securing axle

(pack of 4)
Plain nuts 5/16 4 nuts $0.44 Bunnings Securing wheels

(0.11 each)
PVC drain pipe 295mm length $6.98 Bunnings Chassis

90mm diameter (1.0m)
Total Cost $16.18
1.2. LIST OF TOOLS
Tools required Method of Use Safety Equipment Drawing Reference
Dremel with plasc and Cung cargo hole and Safety glasses Page 4 and 6
metal cung discs threaded rod Steel cap boots
Marker and ruler/tape Marking the PVC pipe N/A Page 2,3,4,5,6
measure and threaded rod for
cung
3D printer and soware Prinng the wheels Safety glasses Page 7

Maintain distance
Sandpaper - 200 grit Smoothing the cuts in Gloves N/A

the PVC pipe.
Hacksaw Cung PVC pipe Gloves Page 2 and 5

Safety glasses
1|Page
Tools required Method of Use Safety Equipment Drawing Reference
File Smoothing threads on Gloves Page 2 and 5

threaded rod.
Spanner and Pliers Used to screw nuts on Gloves Page 2

the axle
Modelling Knife Used to make pilot holes Gloves Page 2 and 6

for drilling
Drill with 10mm drill bit Used to make holes into Gloves Page 2 and 6
the chassis for axle Safety glasses
AutoCAD Create N/A Page 7

stereolithography (STL)
le for prinng
2. METHOD
2.1. CHASSIS PVC PIPE
The chassis is item 1 in drawing MR01-BC|02 Exploded View.
1. Use hacksaw to cut pipe to appropriate length of 295mm, as indicated in MR01-BC|06
Secon A, making sure to keep the cut as straight as possible. Marking the pipe beforehand
will make this process easier and more accurate.
2. Create markings on the pipe in accordance with dimensions in drawings MR01-BC|03 Plan
View and MR01-BC|06 Secon A for the cargo hole and the axle hole locaons.
3. Hold the PVC Pipe using a clamp, use the drill to create the 4 holes to t the axle.
1. Atach the 10mm drill-bit onto the drill.
2. Ensure markings are correct as per MR01-BC|06 Secon A.
3. A small knife may be used to create pilot holes to assist drilling
4. Align the drill to the marked posions and operate the drill. Ensure safety
equipment is worn to prevent dust inhalaon and physical injury.
4. Referring to MR01-BC|03 Plan View use a Dremel with a plasc cung disc to cut the
hole for the cargo (botle).
5. Smooth all edges with sandpaper.
2.2. AXLES THREADED ROD

The axles are item 2 in drawing MR01-BC|02 Exploded View.
1. Use ruler/tape measure to measure 200mm on the threaded rod and use a marker to make
a mark at this length.
2. Use a Dremel with a metal disc to cut at the mark, referring to MR01-BC|05 Front View.
3. Once cut, the axle should be of 200mm and steps 1-2 can be repeated for the second axle.
4. Clean up any burrs from the cuts with the Dremel.
2|Page
2.3. WHEELS 3D PRINTED
The wheels are item 5 in drawing MR01-BC|02 Exploded View.
1. Upload the STL le to a Universal Serial Bus (USB) Storage.
1. Insert the USB Storage into computer.
2. Open the USB under My Computer
3. On the root of your USB, create a folder called EMAS ROVER
4. Open the EMAS ROVER folder
5. Copy the STL le from your computers saved locaon to the EMAS ROVER folder.
6. Ensure the USB is safely ejected to ensure that the le is not corrupted and cause
problems in prinng.
2. Open the STL le with the 3D printer soware. The STL le given during the handover of the
contract - ensure that it is not corrupted; please contact the designers should the STL le is
not opening.
3. Calibrate the 3D printer for ABS plasc referring to MR01-BC|07 Detail 1 - Notes
4. Insert USB into the port of the 3D printer - if the 3D printer does not have a USB port or
cannot, please contact the technician at the location for support.
5. Refer to the User Interface on the 3D printer and select the STL le.
1. Depending on the printer, it will take between 4-6 hours per wheel to be printed.
2. Repeat this step 4 more mes to create a total of 4 wheels.
2.4. MUSK.E MARS ROVER ASSEMBLY

Assemble the rover referring to drawing MR01-BC|02 Exploded View.
1. Once all components are created they can be assembled.
2. Insert the axle into the drilled hole on the PVC Pipe as reference by MR01-BC|02
Exploded View.
3. Once the axle has been inserted, use the pliers to hold the axle in place and screw a lock nut
(item 3 in drawing MR01-BC|02 Exploded View) to secure the axle on the pipe.
1. Repeat for other side to have both side secured.
2. Repeat process for the second axle.
4. Keep holding the axle and screw a plain nut (item 4 in drawing MR01-BC|02 Exploded
View) on the axle as shown in MR01-BC|02 Exploded View.
1. Repeat process for opposite side of axle.
2. Repeat process for second axle.
5. Screw the 3D printed wheels onto the axles as shown in MR01-BC|02 Exploded View,
they should be ght to screw on. Also ensure they remain perpendicular to the axles.
6. Finally, hand ghten the plain nuts against the wheels to prevent them unscrewing during
operaon.
3|Page
REVISION B
MARCH 30, 2017
RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

CLIENT: EMPACT
The following document describes in detail 3 risks associated with each stage of the EFPC Mars
rover project and migaon strategies to minimise or eliminate this risk. This document is the
work of Brody Mellberg and Fardeen Nishad with the assistance of E.M.A.S group members.
Brody Mellberg
Fardeen Nishad
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Risk Matrix .................................................................................................................................... 1
2. Risk Managemnt ........................................................................................................................... 2
2.1. Risk Management Stage 1 .................................................................................................. 2
1. RISK MATRIX
Likelihood or Consequence Severity

Frequency Low Minor Moderate Major Crical
Almost Certain High High Extreme Extreme Extreme
Likely Moderate High High Extreme Extreme
Possible Low Moderate High Extreme Extreme
Unlikely Low Low Moderate High Extreme
Rare Low Low Moderate High High
1|Page
2. RISK MANAGEMNT
2.1. RISK MANAGEMENT STAGE 1
Hazard Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual risk

Inclement weather Inability to attend Likely Low Group members must allow extra me for travel to No residual risk
Illness meetings ensure they arrive at meengs on me, if not early. In Likelihood - Rare
Traffic the case of illness, group members at the meeng
must upload all documentaon online so the
absentee may access the informaon covered in the
meeng. Aer the inial meeng, other unocial
gatherings can be arranged to provide the absent
member on details of the meeng.
Failure of prototype Delays in specifications, Almost Moderate Prototypes based on early designs must be Chance that as time goes
drawings and plans Certain completed and tested as soon as possible during on, prototypes continue to
Reduces time frame for stage 1. Prototype failure at this stage can be fail. Reduced reiterations
said elements to get benecial as the group can make changes and Likelihood - Unlikely
completed improvements to the design.
Disagreement, Interferes with group's Possible Moderate Group members maintain raonality and Personalities in the group
miscommunication ability to work as a reasonability during discussions, and remain open to may still conflict and
and conflict team ideas and suggesons from other members. Any reaching an agreement as
between group Time delays as it takes dierences in ideas/opinions/views must be resolved a group may not always be
members longer to reach a with maturity and an agreement/compromise an easy task
consensus reached as soon as possible. The group must Likelihood - Unlikely
Lower quality of final maintain constant and thorough communicaon
product (through meengs and group chats) to prevent
misunderstandings. It is important members feel like
they can suggest any ideas and changes and be met
with openness and valid, construcve cricism.
2|Page
Hazard Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual risk

Corrupted files, Loss of progress on TEC Unlikely Major To minimise or even eliminate the consequences of Residual risk can be
power outages, Loss of evidence the loss of les, backups and copies must be made of eliminated if mitigated
emails not received Time delays all components of the project. Employing the use of a appropriately
stable cloud-based-storage system is recommended Likelihood - Rare
in conjuncon with having the les on external hard
drives and/or ash drives.
Having documents Issues arising over who Rare Major Evidence must be provided by the group for every Residual risk can be
plagiarised/copied plagiarised who aspect of the assessment. Accurate and thorough eliminated if mitigated
Possible punishment of compleon of meeng agendas and minutes can be appropriately
our group if it is used as evidence to prove what ideas the group came Likelihood - Rare
believed we plagiarised up with and when.
from another group
and not the other way
around
Plagiarism/ Penalties such as loss Unlikely Critical Referencing must be thorough and correct, with all Possibility on unnoticed,
incorrect of marks in minor cases sources listed appropriately using the necessary unintentional plagiarism or
referencing referencing system. In-text citaons must also be insufficient referencing
used where appropriate. Likelihood - Rare
3|Page
Hazard Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual Risk

Power tools Physical injury Unlikely Major Full focus and atenveness is required when Possible unforeseen
during construction operang all power tools. Only those with prior occurrence resulting in
experience handling power tools should perform the physical injury.
steps involving power tool usage. Appropriate safety Likelihood Rare.
equipment such as gloves and safety glasses must be
worn always.
Printing error 3D printing failure Possible Critical 3d printer sengs must be carefully checked before Having an extra 3D printer
Warping and stringing use and the printer must be cleaned out. Ensure the available drastically
of materials calibraons are correct. Having a second 3D printer reduces risks likelihood.
Blocked nozzle on standby in the event the inial 3D printer gets Likelihood - Unlikely
Wrong settings used on blocked will allow for work to connue smoothly. 3D
3D printer printers should only be operated by those with
experience.
Miscommunication Incorrect Possible Major Groups must keep each other up to date with any If the person is up-to-date
with other group assembling changes or problems that occur. Atendance of with all meetings and
members weekly meengs and regular communicaon with changes.
designers is required to ensure the construcon is Likelihood - Rare
going sasfactorily and according to plan, matching
the original design and specicaons.
4|Page
Hazard Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual Risk

Lose axle. Wheels coming off Possible Major Tighten the axle before testing. Having a spare wheel
Hard impact. Wheel breaking Ensure the wheels rotate. reduces the likelihood.
Keep a spare wheel in case one breaks. Likelihood - Unlikely
Poor material The whole rover Unlikely Critical Make sure the specified materials are used with Because extra precautions
choice. breaking correct dimensions. Assemble properly without have been taken, including
Poor assembling. rushing it. tightening the axle and
making sure the specified
materials are used.
Likelihood - Rare
Opening on top of Damaging the payload Unlikely Critical Crafting the opening in the pipe correctly in relation If mitigated properly the
the tube causing to the drawings will minimise any risk of the bottle likelihood is reduced.
the bottle to fall falling out during testing. Wrapping the axle in bubble Likelihood - Rare
out on impact. wrap or tape will absorb the shock of the impacting
Impact being too bottle and prevent any scratching/denting that may
hard causing the occur upon landing.
bottle to hit the
axle and damage.
5|Page
REVISION B
MARCH 30, 2017
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA

CLIENT: EMPACT
The following document describes the criteria set by E.M.A.S for the tendering applicant to
meet if they wish to succeed in their applicaon. This document is the work of Cody Lee with
the assistance of E.M.A.S group members.
Cody Lee
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Professionalism ............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1. Etiquette ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.2. Time Management ................................................................................................................ 2
1.3. Communication Skills ............................................................................................................ 3
1.4. Group Comprehension .......................................................................................................... 3
2. Skills .............................................................................................................................................. 4
2.1. 3D Printing Experience .......................................................................................................... 4
2.2. Power Tool Experience.......................................................................................................... 4
1. PROFESSIONALISM
The design can only be passed on to those who show themselves t to conduct business with. The
level of professionalism shown by those tendering can set them apart from their competors and
will ease the design process. E.M.A.S assesses professionalism by observing the degree to which
the contracng company works with the designers during this process. Replying to emails in a
mely fashion, exercising the use of formal language and quickly clarifying any misunderstandings
that may arise during the process are all qualies sought aer by E.M.A.S. This criterion is of great
importance, and consists of 5 components: communicaon skills, me management, equete,
cooperaon and the groups ability to comprehend the design package, and potenally improve it.
1.1. ETIQUETTE
E.M.A.S assesses the equete of the applicants in two ways; in the communicaons and in the
meengs. Applicants must reply to emails professionally, using appropriate equete and formal
language. Emails must be replied to within 2 working days. An applicants inability to meet the
criteria in the tendering process is indicave of their inability to handle communicaon in later
stages. Miscommunicaon is a serious hazard and will lead to strain and potenal conict between
designers and contractors. The evidence can be supplied in the way the tendering applicants
handle communicaon via emails in the tendering process. The meeng equete relies on the
applicants ability to remain in a fully formal mindset for the duraon of any meengs, that is being
punctual and professional during the meengs. These criteria are important to E.M.A.S. because it
shows the applicants are ready and able to treat this project in a serious manner, and is indicave
of the quality of the contractors.
0 1-2 3-4 5-6
Does not atend Meengs occur aer Shows up to Conrms meengs

meengs. many delays/changes meengs on me. prior to dates.
Disnct lack of to original meeng Expresses enthusiasm Arrives on me to all
interest in the dates. and engagement meengs.
project. Demonstrates some during meengs. Shows enthusiasm
Gives simple, interest in the good hygiene. and interest towards
informal answers to project. Is responsive to the project.
suggesons. Maintenance of quesons and speaks Replies to quesons
personal hygiene. in a formal manner. and speaks in a polite
and formal manner.
Replies within 1-2
days set by the TEC.
Emails use proper
equete and
formang.
1|Page
0 1-2 3-4
Lack of proper equete when Replies to emails within 2 Replies within 1 - 2 working
replying to or sending emails to working days. days set by the TEC.
EMAS. Emails have some equete Emails use appropriate
Failure to reply to emails however lack formang equete and formang.
within 2 working days. (punctuaon, use of capital Uses proper grammar, spelling
Unsasfactory communicaon leters). and sentencing as well as use
with EMAS. Some correct terminology can of appropriate terminology
be seen through emails and where required.
atached documents.
1.2. TIME MANAGEMENT

The applicant must provide evidence of their thought process leading up to the nal design and
progression of nal design over me. Evidence of appropriate me and resource allocaon during
prior stages must be provided, in addion to documentaon outlining me budgeng the bidding
group intends to implement. The applicant must be aware of the possibility of delays and have
migaon strategies planned. The evidence can come in the form of Gant charts, task allocaon
and a detailed risk migaon strategy.
0 1-2 3-4
Has no evidence of a plan to Has a rough plan of me Has an expansive me

manage the building stage of management, but insucient management plan. Including a
this project. evidence of sensible division Gant chart of task allocaon
Has no evidence of proposed and allocaon of tasks. during the building stage with
migaon of me delays. Has provided evidence in the achievable deadlines and
form of writen documents on dividing of tasks.
migaon strategies for risks Has a detailed risk
of delays, but is brief and management strategy that
simplisc, i.e. lists for sickness includes complete eliminaon
not geng sick or passing plans, and ways to substute
the work o onto someone for the risks not eliminated
else. resulng in zero residual risk.
2|Page
1.3. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Must be able to demonstrate that their group have worked eecvely together to compile their
stage 1 assessment. This can be assessed through a submission of the group's weekly progress
reports and minutes of meengs. The ecacy of these documents will demonstrate their level of
communicaon and how they split the workload to achieve a more ecient and successful
outcome.
0 1-2 3-4
Has no evidence of Has provided a single Has meeng agendas and
communicaon skills, and agenda and minutes of all minutes of meengs for all
group works well together meengs. meengs atended.
poorly as a result. Minutes are brief and show All the copies record
only a few members of the construcve team
group acvely parcipang. discussions, and all the
items on the agenda are
lled out due to this.
1.4. GROUP COMPREHENSION

How well a group can comprehend our design drawings and methods is a good indicator as to how
eecvely the group will construct our design. This can be evidenced by how well the group
answers quesons about the design specicaons and if they in turn can oer any insighul
discussion on how they will go about compleng the task. This criterion will, unlike the others, be
marked during meengs.
0 1 2
Group makes no atempt to Applicants oer an Applicants oer
understand the design, for understanding of the design improvements on the
example has an atude of specicaons, i.e. how each specicaons, i.e. lisng
well leave it unl the tool will be used according beter tools, or an
prototyping phase to the method. improvement to the
method.
3|Page
2. SKILLS
The EMAS Mars rover must be built to a high standard, and will require at least a basic set of skills
to complete. If the group can source this ability that is also acceptable, but it is preferred to hire a
company that does not have to further contract, as this will increase cost. The Rover will require
some parts to be 3D printed, thus requires a contractor that can troubleshoot potenal problems.
To full the criteria for praccal skills, they will be required to drill holes into the pipe to secure the
axles. The marking criteria is split into two parts, risk consideraon, and skills in this area, and one
mark for each secon, excepng 5 is awarded for each. For example, the 1-2 criteria are 1 mark for
risk, 1 mark for skills, adding to 2. For 5 points, all criteria in table must be fullled to atain full
marks.
2.1. 3D PRINTING EXPERIENCE

It is important for the design of the Rover (name: Musk.E) that the 3D prinng of the wheels be
completed successfully and this means that the tendering applicants should have some skill in
performing this process safely and accurately. A submission of any evidence dening any degree of
familiarity with the 3D prinng process will be accepted, a CAD le with a somewhat complex, or
complex process (such as non-regular 3D geometry, a good example being the wheel design of the
Musk.E prototype 2.0) will denote 1 or 2 points respecvely, as these can be downloaded o the
internet, but sll show the user can self-source these things at no addional cost, but this brings
with it a risk of plagiarism and is therefore not enough to garner full marks. The risk part of this
criteria relates mostly to the me delays garnered with improperly running a 3D printer. For full
marks in this area, one must demonstrate rst hand they have a complete knowledge of the
programs required for 3D prinng, as well as experience in using a 3D printer, by showing the
designers they can design to a level appropriate for this project, as this will show the designers how
well the applicant trouble shoots in the program itself, and overcomes any dicules. If the
applicant can also supply proof of 3D printer experience this will garner full marks, as this will
migate, mostly, the risk of me delays in this area.
2.2. POWER TOOL EXPERIENCE

The design requires that holes be drilled in the PVC pipe, and if the contractor had previous skills in
this area, that would allow the project to be completed to a higher standard. Evidence of previous
skills can be demonstrated by, for example a video showing them using the tool safely. The
applicant group can show to EMAS a PVC pipe with drilled into it, along with demonstraon
footage. This will be considered as sucient evidence, provided the holes are drilled in accordance
with the drawings and specicaons of the design package. To be considered full marks for risk
management, the contractors must show evidence in the form of a risk migaon plan they have
tailored for their abilies. If the contractors have considered the risks of this assessment, but have
not considered migaon plans they are eligible for one mark. If the applicant has developed some
plans for migaon, and an in-depth risk plan, but their risk migaon includes only basic concepts
like PPE, they are eligible for 2 marks in the risk bracket.
4|Page
Skill 0 1-2 3-4 5
3D Does not show Has basic Can trouble Can acvely

Prinng previous skills in knowledge of 3D shoot in both the produce a
these areas. prinng 3D prinng le, complicated part,
Does not programs, and and the CAD or demonstrate
consider risk can do simplisc program. knowledge of the
management work in them Has an available tools in the
(basic shapes) le showing a program, during
Knows litle about complicated a meeng.
3 D printers and project, such as a Shows evidence
the way they designed part or of 3D prinng
work, leading to a previous project. experience, such
lack of as photos of a
understanding of previously
the hazards, designed project,
including me that shows they
delays arising can prevent
from injury and me
inexperience. delay.
Power Demonstrates Demonstrates Can demonstrate

Tool litle knowledge adequate during meeng
Experience of the area or can knowledge and is knowledge of the
source an readily able to required tools,
experienced show proof of and state their
contractor this experiences with
Shows Demonstrates them
acknowledgment vague knowledge Shows a full
for safety of safety consideraon of
procedures, but procedures, and the hierarchy of
not related to this risks/hazards. risks, and a
project, i.e. can i.e. specically migaon plan
list risk references this that involves a
management project, but has personal
strategies, but no idea beyond consideraon for
does not apply PPE and simple their abilies and
them to this migaon experience level.
project strategies.
Sub Risk Skills

scores /5 /5
Total
score /10
5|Page
REVISION B
MARCH 30, 2017
GANTT CHART (SCHEDULE)

CLIENT: EMPACT
The Gant Chart shows E.M.A.S members schedule. This document is the work of Sithu Win
Than with the assistance of E.M.A.S group members.
Sithu Win Than

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Gantt Chart (Schedule).................................................................................................................. 1
1. GANTT CHART (SCHEDULE)
WK 5 WK 6 TFW TFW WK 7 WK 8 WK 9 WK 10 WK 11 WK 12
EFPC Stage 1 Design Stage 2 Contractors Stage 2 Designers Handover Engineering Identity Presentation
Package Reflection
Team Action Plan Unit Reflection
Presentation
Review.
OTHER EFY MATH1020 Oral COMP1004 MATH1020 Mid MAEN1000 Test MATH1020 Oral MATH1020 Workshop MATH1020 Lab
DEADLINES Assessment Workshop Semester Test Module 1 Assessment Assessment Assessment
Assessment COMP1004 Online COMP1004 Mid COMP1004 Online
Quiz Semester Test Quiz
CONTRACTORS Complete Design Put assessment in Begin drafting Write application Discuss with Attend meetings Portfolio work Complete prototype, Prototype testing Identify lesson
CODY Package. portfolio. Executive Summary. for tender: advisors about the with designers. record any peer review learnt in course,
BRODY Expand on portfolio. Attend meetings - Executive draft. deviations/changes assessment. and write about it.
FARDEEN with designers. Summary. Submit Assessment. from method and Prepare for Practice
- Design Package model proposed by presentation. presentation
Review. designers. Present end of
- Response to semester reflection.
Tender Evaluation
Criteria.
DESIGNERS Complete Design Put assessment in Portfolio work. Respond to Portfolio work. Begin the full Final decision and Review prototype and Prototype testing Identify lesson
BEN Package. portfolio. Attend meetings applicants emails assessment on grading, including: assess areas for peer review learnt in course,
SITHU Expand on portfolio. with contractors. and queries. contractors - Response to improvement in design. assessment. and write about it.
Begin assessing the applicants. design package Prepare for Practice
applicants on time review. presentation. presentation
management and - Executive Present end of
communication. summary. semester reflection.
- Grade of
Contractors.
1|Page

Emas - Efpc Stage 1 Design Package

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Emas - Efpc Stage 1 Design Package

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

REVISION C

MARCH 30, 2017

STAGE 1 DESIGN PACKAGE

Stage 1 Design Package

Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: NTS

Project: MARS LANDER/ROVER

Project: MARS LANDER/ROVER

Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: 1:1

Project: MARS LANDER/ROVER

Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: 1:1

Project: MARS LANDER/ROVER

Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: 1:1

Project: MARS LANDER/ROVER

Size: A3 Units: mm Scale: 1:1

Project: MARS LANDER/ROVER

DETAIL - 1 SIDE VIEW

Sithu Win Than

Item Quanty Cost Supplier Purpose

3D prinng 104.0 grams $3.12 Curn 3D prinng Wheels

Threaded rod 400mm length $2.43 Bunnings Axle

Lock nuts 5/16 4 nuts $3.21 Bunnings Securing axle

Plain nuts 5/16 4 nuts $0.44 Bunnings Securing wheels

PVC drain pipe 295mm length $6.98 Bunnings Chassis

Total Cost $16.18

1.2. LIST OF TOOLS

Tools required Method of Use Safety Equipment Drawing Reference

3D printer and soware Prinng the wheels Safety glasses Page 7

Sandpaper - 200 grit Smoothing the cuts in Gloves N/A

Hacksaw Cung PVC pipe Gloves Page 2 and 5

File Smoothing threads on Gloves Page 2 and 5

Spanner and Pliers Used to screw nuts on Gloves Page 2

Modelling Knife Used to make pilot holes Gloves Page 2 and 6

AutoCAD Create N/A Page 7

2.2. AXLES THREADED ROD

2.4. MUSK.E MARS ROVER ASSEMBLY

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

Likelihood or Consequence Severity

Hazard Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual risk

Hazard Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual risk

Hazard Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual Risk

Hazard Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual Risk

TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA

0 1-2 3-4 5-6

Does not atend Meengs occur aer Shows up to Conrms meengs

1.2. TIME MANAGEMENT

Has no evidence of a plan to Has a rough plan of me Has an expansive me

1.4. GROUP COMPREHENSION

2.1. 3D PRINTING EXPERIENCE

2.2. POWER TOOL EXPERIENCE

3D Does not show Has basic Can trouble Can acvely

Power Demonstrates Demonstrates Can demonstrate

Sub Risk Skills

GANTT CHART (SCHEDULE)

Sithu Win Than

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen