Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2.1 Summary ................................................ 5 Osteomyelitis of the jaws is still a fairly common dis-
2.2 Definition ............................................... 6 ease in maxillofacial clinics and offices, despite the
2.3 History . .................................................. 6 introduction of antibiotics and the improvement of
2.4 Overview of Currently Used dental and medical care. The literature on this disease
Classification Systems and Terminology . 7 is extensive. Different terminologies and classification
2.5 Currently Used Terms in Classification systems are used based on a variety of features such as
of Osteomyelitis of the Jaws .. ................. 11 clinical course, pathologicalanatomical or radiological
2.5.1 Acute/Subacute Osteomyelitis ............... 11 features, etiology, and pathogenesis. A mixture of these
2.5.2 Chronic Osteomyelitis ............................ 11 classification systems has occurred throughout the liter-
2.5.3 Chronic Suppurative Osteomyelitis: ature, leading to confusion and thereby hindering com-
Secondary Chronic Osteomyelitis . ......... 11 parative studies. An overview of the most commonly
2.5.4 Chronic Non-suppurative Osteomyelitis . 11 used terms and classification systems in osteomyelitis of
2.5.5 Diffuse Sclerosing Osteomyelitis, the jaws is given at the beginning of this chapter.
Primary Chronic Osteomyelitis, The Zurich classification system, as advocated in this
Florid Osseous Dysplasia, textbook, is primarily based on the clinical course and
Juvenile Chronic Osteomyelitis .............. 11 appearance of the disease as well as on imaging studies.
2.5.6 SAPHO Syndrome, Chronic Recurrent Subclassification is based on etiology and pathogenesis of
Multifocal Osteomyelitis (CRMO) . .......... 13 the disease. Mainly three different types of osteomyelitis
2.5.7 Periostitis Ossificans, are distinguished: acute and secondary chronic osteo-
Garrs Osteomyelitis .............................. 13 myelitis and primary chronic osteomyelitis. Acute and
2.5.8 Other Commonly Used Terms ................. 13 secondary chronic osteomyelitis are basically the same
2.6 Osteomyelitis of the Jaws: disease separated by the arbitrary time limit of 1month
The Zurich Classification System ............ 16 after onset of the disease. They usually represent a true
5
2.6.1 General Aspects of the Zurich bacterial infection of the jawbone. Suppuration, fistula
Classification System . ............................ 16 formation, and sequestration are characteristic features
2.6.2 Acute Osteomyelitis and Secondary of this disease entity. Depending on the intensity of the
Chronic Osteomyelitis ............................ 17 infection and the host bone response, the clinical pre-
2.6.3 Clinical Presentation .............................. 26 sentation and course may vary significantly. Acute and
2.6.4 Primary Chronic Osteomyelitis ............... 34 secondary chronic osteomyelitis of the jaws is caused
2.7 Differential Diagnosis . ........................... 48 mostly by a bacterial focus (odontogenic disease, pulpal
2.7.1 General Considerations .......................... 48 and periodontal infection, extraction wounds, foreign
2.7.2 Differential Diagnosis of Acute bodies, and infected fractures).
and Secondary Chronic Osteomyelitis . .. 50 Primary chronic osteomyelitis of the jaw is a rare,
2.7.3 Differential Diagnosis of Primary nonsuppurative, chronic inflammation of an unknown
Chronic Osteomyelitis ............................ 50 cause. Based on differences in age at presentation,
2 Marc Baltensperger, Gerold Eyrich
clinical appearance and course, as well as radiology and in the medical literature to describe a true infection of
histology, the disease may be subclassified into early- the bone induced by pyogenic microorganisms (Marx
and adult-onset primary chronic osteomyelitis. Cases 1991).
with purely mandibular involvement are further distin-
guished from cases associated with extragnathic derma-
toskeletal involvement such as in SAPHO syndrome or 2.3 History
chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO).
The prevalence, clinical course, and management of os-
teomyelitis of the jawbones have changed profoundly
2.2 Definition over the past 50years. This is due to mainly one factor:
the introduction of antibiotic therapy, specifically peni-
The word osteomyelitis originates from the ancient cillin. The integration of antibiotics into the therapeu-
Greek words osteon (bone) and muelinos (marrow) tic armamentarium has led to a complete renaissance
and means infection of medullary portion of the bone. in the treatment of most infectious diseases, including
Common medical literature extends the definition to an osteomyelitis (Hudson 1993). Further factors, such as
inflammation process of the entire bone including the sophistication in medical and dental science as well as
cortex and the periosteum, recognizing that the patho- the widespread availability for adequate treatment, have
logical process is rarely confined to the endosteum. It additionally led to improvement in the management of
usually encompasses the cortical bone and periosteum as this disease. Modern diagnostic imaging allows much
well. It can therefore be considered as an inflammatory earlier treatment of bone infections at a more localized
condition of the bone, beginning in the medullar cavity stage.
and havarian systems and extending to involve the pe- In the preantibiotic era, the classical presentation of
riosteum of the affected area. The infection becomes es- jawbone osteomyelitis was an acute onset, usually fol-
tablished in calcified portion of the bone when pus and lowed by a later transition to a secondary chronic pro-
edema in the medullary cavity and beneath the perios- cess (Wassmund 1935; Axhausen 1934). Massive clinical
teum compromises or obstructs the local blood supply. symptoms with widespread bone necroses, neoosteo-
Following ischemia, the infected bone becomes necrotic genesis, large sequester formation, and intra- and ex-
and leads to sequester formation, which is considered a traoral fistula formation were common presentations,
classical sign of osteomyelitis (Topazian 1994, 2002). sometimes leading to significant facial disfigurement
Although other etiological factors, such as traumatic (Fig.2.1).
injuries, radiation, and certain chemical substances, After the introduction of antibiotics, acute phases
among others, may also produce inflammation of the were often concealed by these antimicrobial drugs with-
medullar space, the term osteomyelitis is mostly used out fully eliminating the infection. Subacute or chronic
.. Fig.2.1ac Elder case of advanced secondary chronic with large exposure of infected bone and sequestra (b).
osteomyelitis of the left mandible. The massive affec- Large sequester collected from surgery (c) (Courtesy of
tion of the left mandible demonstrates extraoral fistula N.Hardt)
and scar formation (a). Intraoral view of the same patient
Osteomyelitis of the Jaws: Definition and Classification 2
forms of osteomyelitis have therefore become more guiding therapeutic strategies such as surgery and an-
prominent, lacking an actual acute phase (Becker 1973; tibiotic therapy. A more comprehensive classification
Bnger 1984). proposed by Cieny et al. (1985) and Mader and Calhoun
(2000) is based upon the anatomy of the bone infec-
tion and the physiology of the host. It divides the dis-
2.4 Overview of Currently Used ease into four stages combining four anatomical disease
Classification Systems types and three physiological host categories resulting
and Terminology in the description of 12 discrete clinical stages of osteo-
myelitis. Such a classification system, although it may be
One of the first widely accepted staging systems for os- important in dealing with numerous sites of the skeletal
teomyelitis in long bones was first described by Wald- system and allowing stratification of infection and the
vogel and Medoff (1970) and Waldvogel et al. (1970a,b). development of comprehensive treatment guidelines for
The authors distinguished three categories of osteomy- each stage, is unnecessarily complex and impractical
elitis: osteomyelitis from hematogenous spread; from a when dealing with infections of the jawbones.
contagious focus; and due to vascular insufficiency. The Because of its unique feature bearing teeth and
classification is primarily based on etiology and patho- hence connecting to the oral cavity with the periodontal
geneses of infection and does not readily lend itself to membrane, osteomyelitis of the jaws differs in several
.. Table2.1 Classification systems described in the literature for osteomyelitis of the jaws
Reference Classification Classification criteria
Hudson JW I. Acute forms of osteomyelitis (suppura- Classification based on clinical picture and
Osteomyelitis of the jaws: a 50-year tive or nonsuppurative) radiology.
perspective. A. Contagious focus The two major groups (acute and
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993 Dec; 1. Trauma chronic osteomyelitis) are differenti-
51(12):1294-301 2. Surgery ated by the clinical course of the
3. Odontogenic Infection disease after onset, relative to surgi-
B. Progressive cal and antimicrobial therapy. The
1. Burns arbitrary time limit of 1 month is used
2. Sinusitis to differentiate acute from chronic
3. Vascular insufficiency osteomyelitis (Marx 1991; Mercuri1991;
C. Hematogenous(metastatic) Koorbusch1992).
1. Developing skeleton (children)
II. Chronic forms of osteomyelitis
A. Recurrent multifocal
1. Developing skeleton (children)
2. Escalated osteogenic (activity
<age 25 years)
B. Garr's
1. Unique proliferative
subperiosteal reaction
2. Developing skeleton (children 7
and young adults)
C. Suppurative or nonsuppurative
1. Inadequately treated forms
2. Systemically compromised
forms
3. Refractory forms (chronic recur-
rent multifocal osteomyelitis
CROM)
D. Diffuse sclerosing
1. Fastidious microorganisms
2. Compromised host/pathogen
interface
2 Marc Baltensperger, Gerold Eyrich
.. Table2.2 Classification systems described in the literature for osteomyelitis of the jaws
Reference Classification Classification criteria
important aspects from osteomyelitis of long bones. standing recognition of osteomyelitis of jawbones as a
The specific local immunological and microbiological clinical entity, which differs in many important aspects
aspects determine a major factor in the etiology and from the one found in long bones; hence, a wide vari-
pathogenesis of this disease, and hence also have a di- ety of classifications, specifically for the jawbones, have
rect impact on its treatment; therefore, to extrapolate been established by several authors in the medical lit-
from long bone infections to disease of the jaws is only erature. Classifications proposed are based on different
possible with limitations. This is reflected by the long- aspects such as clinical course, pathologicalanatomical
Osteomyelitis of the Jaws: Definition and Classification 2
.. Table2.3 Classification systems described in the literature for osteomyelitis of the jaws
Reference Classification Classification criteria
Panders AK, Hadders HN I. Primarily chronic jaw inflammation Classification based on clinical picture and
Chronic sclerosing inflammations of 1. Osteomyelitis sicca (synonymous radiology
the jaw. Osteomyelitis sicca (Garre), osteomyelitis of Garr, chronic Classification of chronic osteomyelitis
chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis with sclerosing nonsuppurative forms only
fine-meshed trabecular structure, and osteomyelitis of Garr, periostitis
very dense sclerosing osteomyelitis. ossificans)
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970 2. Chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis
Sep;30(3):396-412 with fine-meshed trabecular
structure
3. Local and more extensive very
dense sclerosing osteomyelitis
II. Secondary chronic jaw inflammation
III. Chronic specific jaw inflammations
Tuberculosis
Syphilis
Lepra
Actinomycosis
.. Table2.4 Classification systems described in the literature for osteomyelitis of the jaws
Reference Classification Classification criteria
Bernier S, Clermont S, Maranda G, I. Suppurative osteomyelitis Classification based on clinical picture and
Turcotte JY 1. Acute suppurative osteomyelitis radiology
Osteomyelitis of the jaws. 2. Chronic suppurative osteomyelitis
J Can Dent Assoc 1995 May;61(5):441-2, II. Nonsuppurative osteomyelitis
445-8 1. Chronic focal sclerosing osteomy-
elitis
2. Chronic diffuse sclerosing osteo-
myelitis
3. Garr's chronic sclerosing osteomy-
elitis (proliferative osteomyelitis)
III. Osteoradionecrosis
2.5 Currently Used Terms al. 1995; Topazian 1994, 2002) and can mostly be used
in Classification of Osteomyelitis interchangeably with the term secondary chronic os-
of the Jaws teomyelitis, which is predominantly used in literature
from continental Europe (Hjorting-Hansen 1970; Pan-
2.5.1 Acute/Subacute Osteomyelitis ders and Hadders 1970; Schelhorn and Zenk 1989). It
is by far the most common osteomyelitis type, which is
Although acute forms of osteomyelitis are seen only usually caused by bacterial invasion from a contagious
rarely these days, most authors in common medical lit- focus. Most frequent sources are odontogenic foci,
erature still describe this form as an entity of its own. periodontal diseases and pulpal infections, extraction
Mercuri (1991) and Marx (1991) arbitrarily defined the wounds, and infected fractures. Pus, fistula, and se-
time element as being 1month after onset of symptoms. questration are typical clinical findings of this disease.
Endurance past this arbitrary set time limit is then con- Clinically and radiographically, a broad spectrum rang-
sidered as chronic osteomyelitis reflecting the inability ing from an aggressive osteolytic putrefactive phase to
of host defense mechanisms to eradicate the responsible a dry osteosclerotic phase may be observed (Eyrich et
pathogen. Many authors have agreed on this classifica- al. 1999).
tion and have used the term likewise in their publica-
tions (Koorbusch et al. 1992; Hudson 1993; Schuknecht
et al. 1997; Schuknecht and Valavanis 2003; Eyrich et al. 2.5.4 Chronic Non-suppurative Osteomyelitis
1999; Baltensperger et al. 2004).
The term subacute osteomyelitis is not clearly de- The term nonsuppurative osteomyelitis describes a
fined in the literature. Many authors use the term in- more heterogenic group of chronic osteomyelitis forms,
terchangeably with acute osteomyelitis, and some use which lacks the formation of pus and fistula. Topazian
it to describe cases of chronic osteomyelitis with more (1994, 2002) includes chronic sclerosing types of os-
prominent (subacute) symptoms. In some instances, teomyelitis, proliferative periostitis, as well as actino-
subacute osteomyelitis is referred to as a transitional mycotic and radiation-induced forms to this group,
stage within the time frame of acute osteomyelitis and whereas Bernier et al. (1995) advocate a more restric-
corresponds to the third and fourth week after onset of tive use of this term. Hudson (1993) uses the term to
symptoms (Schuknecht et al. 1997; Schuknecht and Va- describe a condition of prolonged refractory osteomy-
lavanis 2003). elitis due to inadequate treatment, a compromised host,
or increased virulence and antibiotic resistance of the
involved microorganisms. This classification therefore
2.5.2 Chronic Osteomyelitis also incorporates those cases in which a suppurative
form of osteomyelitis can present as a nonsuppurative
The classification of chronic osteomyelitis is incoherent form in an advanced stage.
and confusing. Different disease processes have been
described by this one term in some instances, whereas
several terms have been designated for lesions that rep- 2.5.5 Diffuse Sclerosing Osteomyelitis,
resent the same entity in other instances (Groot et al. Primary Chronic Osteomyelitis,
1996; Eyrich et al. 1999). Florid Osseous Dysplasia,
Many authors agree that chronic osteomyelitis in- Juvenile Chronic Osteomyelitis
11
volving the jawbone may be divided in two major cat-
egories: suppurative and nonsuppurative forms (Mit- One of the most confusing terms among the currently
termayer 1976; Hudson 1993; Topazian 1994, 2002; used osteomyelitis nomenclature is diffuse sclerosing
Bernier et al. 1995). osteomyelitis (DSO). This term has apparently led to
great confusion in the medical literature. A variety of
denominations were used to describe this disease. One
2.5.3 Chronic Suppurative Osteomyelitis: of the first descriptions was by Thoma in 1944, who used
Secondary Chronic Osteomyelitis the term ossifying osteomyelitis and considered that
a disease which was caused by a subpyogenic infection
Chronic suppurative osteomyelitis is an often preferred that could be found in tertiary syphilis. Sclerosing os-
term in Anglo-American texts (Marx 1991; Bernier et teomyelitis was later described and divided into a focal
2 Marc Baltensperger, Gerold Eyrich
and diffuse types (Shafer 1957; Shafer et al. 1974; Pin- Patients suffering from this disease, similar to true DSO,
dborg and Hjorting-Hansen 1974; Mittermayer 1976; may in some instances also experience cyclic episodes
Topazian 1994, 2002). The focal type, also known as of unilateral pain and mild swelling. This is usually the
periapical osteitis/osteomyelitis or condensing osteitis, case when superinfection occurs (Schneider et al. 1990;
is a rather common condition with a pathognomonic, Groot et al. 1996)
well-circumscribed radioopaque mass of sclerotic bone As with all pathologies of the bone which compro-
surrounding the apex of the root. Since the infection in mise local blood flow and host resistance, FOD makes
these cases is limited to the apex of the root with the the jaw more susceptible to secondary infection. In
absence of deep bone invasion, sufficient endodontic these instances pus and fistula formation may occur as
treatment with or without apex surgery or extraction of well as sequestration (Carlson 1994). Many cases like
the affected tooth usually leads to regression of these le- these in the literature have, in retrospect, been incor-
sions or residual sclerosis may remain as a bone scar. rectly labeled as diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis where
True diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis, however, is a these symptoms are by definition always absent. The
rare disease of unknown etiology that can cause major FOD should therefore be considered more a bone pa-
diagnostic and therapeutic problems (Jacobson 1984). thology facilitating osteomyelitis once infection of the
The absence of pus, fistula, and sequestration are char- bone has been established and not equated with the in-
acteristic. The disease shows an insidious onset, lacking fection itself.
an acute state. It is therefore considered to be primary As mentioned above, the exact etiology of true DSO
chronic and has been named primary chronic osteomy- remains unknown. A common theory is a low-grade in-
elitis by several authors, predominantly in the German fection of some kind; however, most biopsy specimens
and continental European medical and dental literature taken from the enoral and extraoral approach have
(Hjorting-Hansen 1970; Panders and Hadders 1970; failed to be conclusive, showing either no growth in
Schelhorn and Zenk 1989; Eyrich at al 1999). Periods cultures or growth only from suspected contaminants
of onset usually last from a few days up to several weeks (Jacobson et al. 1982; Jacobson 1984; Van Merkesteyn
and may demonstrate a cyclic course with symptom- et al. 1988). A study by Marx et al. (1994) demonstrated
free intervals. Pain, swelling, and limitation of mouth a high frequency of Actinomyces, E. corrodens species,
opening, as well as occasional lymphadenopathy, domi- Arachnia and Bacteroides spp. in cortical and medullar
nate the clinical picture. samples from patients with DSO. This study, like many
The term DSO is primarily descriptive of the radio- others, still demonstrated insufficiencies regarding the
logical appearance of the pathological bone reaction; protocol for collecting bone specimens and therefore
however, although the term is usually used synony- was inconclusive. Moreover, a variety of antibiotics used
mously with primary chronic osteomyelitis, it repre- over a long period consistently failed to fully eradicate
sents a description of a strictly radiological appearance the disease or arrest the symptoms (Jacobson 1984; Van
that can be caused by several similar processes. These Merkesteyn et al. 1988, 1990). Van Merkesteyn et al.
processes include primary and secondary chronic osteo- (1990) and Groot et al. (1992a) have advocated other
myelitis, chronic tendoperiostitis, and ossifying perios- etiologies such as aberrant jaw positioning and para-
titis or Garrs osteomyelitis (Hjorting-Hansen 1970; El- function; however, their theory lacks an explanation for
lis et al. 1977; Eisenbund et al. 1981; Bnger 1984; Van those cases of true DSO in edentulous patients.
Merkestyn et al. 1990; Groot et al. 1992b, 1996; Eyrich In our recent publications (Eyrich et al. 1999, 2003;
et al. 1999). This fact has most likely contributed to this Baltesperger et al. 2004) we used the term juvenile
12
diversity in nomenclature, as the terms are often used chronic osteomyelitis, which resembles the clinical
interchangeably. and radiological picture of Garrs osteomyelitis as used
A further pathological disease entity has been con- by various authors. Heggie et al. (2000, 2003) made a
fused with diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis, since it may similar observation when analyzing his young osteomy-
mimic DSO radiographically by presenting scleros- elitis patients and used the term juvenile mandibular
ing opaque and dense masses: florid osseous dysplasia chronic osteomyelitis. This disease usually peaks at
(FOD). These masses are, however, confined to the al- puberty and is characterized mostly by voluminous ex-
veolar process of either or both jaws in cases of FOD. pansion of the mandibular body, periosteal apposition
Florid osseous dysplasia is mostly observed in black of bone (periostitis ossificans), and a mixed sclerotic-
women and in many cases lacks clinical symptoms. lytic appearance of the cancellous bone. The clinical
Osteomyelitis of the Jaws: Definition and Classification 2
picture resembles primary chronic osteomyelitis, shar- for a condition that may be caused by several similar
ing the lack of pus formation, fistulae, or sequestration. entities. It is merely a periosteal inflammatory reaction
Juvenile chronic osteomyelitis is therefore considered to to many nonspecific stimuli, leading to the formation
be an early-onset form of primary chronic osteomyeli- of an immature type of new bone outside the normal
tis. A further and more detailed description of this dis- cortical layer.
ease entity is described later in this chapter. Probably the most confusing and misinterpreted
term regarding osteomyelitis is Garrs osteomyelitis.
While most medical pathologists discard the term, it
2.5.6 SAPHO Syndrome, Chronic Recurrent has still enjoyed great acceptance in the medical and
Multifocal Osteomyelitis (CRMO) dental literature, where occurrence in the jaws has
been termed unequivocally (Eversole et al. 1979). Many
In 1986 Chamot et al. described a syndrome associ- terms have been used synonymously in the literature
ated with synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and and attributed to Garr, such as periostitis ossificans,
osteitis (SAPHO syndrome). Soon, several case reports chronic nonsuppurative osteomyelitis of Garr, Garrs
and studies were published, concluding a possible re- proliferative periostitis, chronic sclerosing inflamma-
lationship between SAPHO syndrome and DSO of the tion of the jaw, chronic osteomyelitis with proliferative
mandible (Brandt et al. 1995; Kahn et al. 1994; Garcia- periostitis, and many more. Table2.5 gives an overview
Mann et al. 1996; Suei et al. 1996; Schilling et al. 1999; of the use of the term Garrs osteomyelitis in the
Eyrich et al. 1999; Roldan et al. 2001; Fleuridas et al. medical and dental literature; however, in his histori-
2002). Kahn et al. (1994) presented a small series of cal article in 1893, Carl Garr did not actually describe
seven patients with DSO of the mandible out of 85 cases a singular, specific type of osteomyelitis. Moreover he
of SAPHO syndrome. Eyrich et al. (1999) presented a described special forms and complications of a single
series of nine patients with DSO, eight of which also disease: acute infective osteomyelitis. He used 72 illus-
represented a SAPHO syndrome, supporting the hy- trative cases (98 sites) to discuss ten specific manifes-
pothesis of a possible association of the two. tations and complications of acute osteomyelitis. This
Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a direct contradiction to those authors who assume
is characterized by periods of exacerbations and re- that he described a new form of chronic osteomyelitis
missions over many years. This rare disease is noted in (Wood et al. 1988).
adults as in children, although it is predominant in the
latter group. In several articles published in the past few
years, a possible nosological relationship between dif- 2.5.8 Other Commonly Used Terms
fuse sclerosing osteomyelitis and chronic recurrent mul-
tifocal osteomyelitis has been described (Reuland et al. 2.5.8.1 Alveolar Osteitis (Dry Socket)
1992; Stewart et al. 1994; Suei et al. 1994, 1995; Flygare
et al. 1997; Zebedin et al. 1998; Schilling 1998; Schil- The clinical term dry socket or alveolar osteitis may
ling et al. 1999). In correlation with advanced age, there also be regarded as a localized form of infection. Vari-
seems to be an increased association with palmoplantar ous authors have used this term differently. Hjorting-
pustulosis, a part of the SAPHO syndrome (Shilling et Hansen (1960) describes three principle forms of dry
al. 2000). Because of its possible relationship with other socket: alveolitis simplex; alveolitis granulomatosa; and
dermatoskeletal associated diseases, CRMO has been an alveolitis sicca. Amler (1973) differentiates among al-
13
integrated in the nosological heterogeneous SAPHO veolar osteitis, suppurative osteitis, and fibrous osteitis.
syndrome by several authors (Chamot et al. 1994; Schil- The author concludes that the three types of osteitis cor-
ling and Kessler 1998; Schilling et al. 2000). respond to disturbances during the natural healing pro-
cess of an extraction alveolus. Meyer (1971) took great
effort in demonstrating the histopathological changes
2.5.7 Periostitis Ossificans, in alveolar osteitis. He classifies this condition accord-
Garrs Osteomyelitis ing to the degree of local invasion of the surrounding
bone and uses the terms osteitis circumscripta superfi-
Strictly periostitis ossificans or ossifying periostitis is, cialis, media and profunda. The term latter may be
like diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis, a descriptive term seen as a localized form of osteomyelitis; however, the
2 Marc Baltensperger, Gerold Eyrich
.. Table2.5 Use of the term Garrs osteomyelitis in medical and dental literature
Reference Term used Type of Publication
Batcheldor GD, Giansanti JS, Hibbard ED, Waldron CA (1) Garr's osteomyelitis Case report (1 & 2)
Garrs osteomyelitis of the jaws: a review and report of Review article (3)
two cases
J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87:892-7
Ellis DJ, Winslow JR, Indovina AA (2)
Garrs osteomyelitis of the mandible. Report of a case.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977 Aug;44(2):183-9
Marx RE (3)
Chronic Osteomyelitis of the Jaws
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America,
Vol 3, No 2, May 91, 367-81
Smith SN, Farman AG. Osteomyelitis with proliferative periostitis Case report
Osteomyelitis with proliferative periostitis (Garr's osteo-
myelitis). Report of a case affecting the mandible.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977 Feb;43(2):315-8
.. Table 2.6 Distribution of osteomyelitis cases treated at the Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery in Zurich,
19702000 (Baltensperger 2003)
Major groups of osteomyelitis of the jaws Cases
16
N %
The Zurich classification of osteomyelitis of the jaws .. Fig.2.2 The Zurich classifi-
cation of osteomyelitis of the
jaws: since secondary chronic
Acute Secondary chronic
Chronic Primary chronic
Chronic
osteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis Osteomyelitis
osteomyelitis Osteomyelitis
osteomyelitis
osteomyelitis is a sequel of the
prolonged and chronified acute
form, both basically have the
Neonatal, tooth germ associated Early onset
Trauma/fracture related (juvenile chronic osteomyelitis) same subclassification groups
Odontogenic Adult onset
Foreign body, transplant/implant induced Syndrome associated
Associated with bone pathology and/
or systemic disease
Other (not further classifiable) cases
.. Table2.7 Classification criteria upon which the Zurich classification of osteomyelitis is based
Hierarchic order Classification criteria Classification groups
of classification criteria
17
First Clinical appearance and Major Groups
course of disease Acute osteomyelitis (AO)
Radiology Secondary chronic osteomyelitis (SCO)
Primary chronic osteomyelitis (PCO)
Second Pathology (gross pathology Differentiation of cases that cannot clearly be distinguished
and histology) solely on clinical appearance and course of disease; important
for exclusion of differential diagnosis in borderline cases.
Onset of disease
and secondary chronic os-
teomyelitis of the jawbone
(Adapted from Marx and Mer-
4 weeks
curi 1991)
Acute Secondary
osteomyelitis chronic osteomyelitis
t
Onset of disease
Disease
(deep bacterial
(=deep bacterial invasion
invasion into
into
medullar and cortical bone)
until it should be considered as chronic. They set an ar- 2.6.2.2 Predisposing Factors,
bitrary time limit of 4weeks after onset of disease. Path- Etiology, and Pathogenesis
ologicalanatomical onset of osteomyelitis corresponds
to deep bacterial invasion into the medullar and cortical 2.6.2.2.1 General Considerations
bone. After the period of 4weeks, a persisting bone in-
fection should be considered as secondary chronic os- As mentioned previously, there are several etiological
teomyelitis (Fig.2.3). Although the onset of the disease factors, such as traumatic injuries, radiation, and cer-
is a debatable point in time, it is still a simple and clear tain chemical substances, among others, which may
classification criterion and therefore of practical use for cause inflammation in the medullar space of the bone;
the clinician. This same definition was later used by sev- however, acute and secondary chronic osteomyelitis,
eral other authors (Eyrich et al. 1999; Schuknecht et al. as these terms are generally used in the medical and
1997; Koorbusch et al. 1992). Because of its simplicity dental literature and in this textbook, represent a true
and clarity, this criterion is also used in the Zurich clas- infection of the bone induced by pyogenic microorgan-
sification to differentiate acute osteomyelitis from sec- isms.
ondary chronic osteomyelitis cases. The oral cavity harbors a large number of bacteria,
The term subacute osteomyelitis is not clearly de- among which many may be identified as possible patho-
fined in the literature. Most clinicians would probably gens to cause infection of the jawbone. Regarding the
agree that this term describes a condition somewhat in high frequency and sometimes severity of odontogenic
between acute and chronic osteomyelitis with relatively infections in the daily dental and oral surgery practice,
moderate symptoms. To avoid confusion and keep the and the intimate relationship of dental roots apices with
classification as simple as possible, this term has been the medullar cavity of the jawbone, it is remarkable that
18
abandoned in the Zurich classification. osteomyelitis cases are not more frequently observed.
According to this definition, acute and secondary Explanation for the low incidence of osteomyelitis of
chronic osteomyelitis are to be considered the same the jawbones can be explained by four primary factors
disease at different stages of their course; hence, both which are responsible for deep bacterial invasion into
groups are presented and discussed together in this the medullar cavity and cortical bone and hence estab-
chapter. lishment of the infection:
1. Number of pathogens
2. Virulence of pathogens
3. Local and systemic host immunity
4. Local tissue perfusion
Osteomyelitis of the Jaws: Definition and Classification 2
blood supply of the jawbone is given in Table 2.10. In 2.6.2.2.5 Etiology and Pathogenesis,
many cases of acute and secondary chronic osteomyeli- Subclassification Groups
tis none of these factors may be apparent or detected;
however, they must always be considered, looked for, According to the classification criteria stated previously,
and ultimately treated (Baltensperger 2003). subclassification of acute and secondary chronic osteo-
myelitis is based on presumed etiology and pathogene-
2.6.2.2.4 Microbiology sis of disease (Tables2.7 and 2.11). Acute and secondary
chronic osteomyelitis are initiated by a contagious focus
Acute and secondary chronic osteomyelitis are consid- of infection or by hematogenous spread. In osteomyeli-
ered true infections of the bone induced by pyogenic tis of long bones, hematogenous spread is the leading
microorganisms. As shown in Fig.2.5, the number and cause, especially in infants and children, because of the
virulence of these pathogens are important factors in distinct anatomy of the metaphyseal region. In most of
the establishment of a bone infection. these cases a single responsible pathogen can be isolated
Although until recently involvement of S. aureus, (Mader and Calhoun 2000). Staphylococcusspp. are the
S. epidermidis, and Actinomyces were still discussed most common organisms isolated in adults and are also
as the major pathogens in cases of osteomyelitis of the prominent in children and infants.
jaws, more recent studies favor the concept of a poly- Osteomyelitis of the jaws induced by hematogenous
microbic infection with several responsible pathogens. spread has become a rarity since the introduction of an-
This shift in doctrine is explained mainly by modern, tibiotics; however, in regions of limited medical access
sophisticated culture methods, especially involving these forms may still be noted. Especially one form of os-
anaerobic media, which enable identification of pos- teomyelitis of hematogenous spread merits special men-
sible pathogens more accurately. Consequently, many tion: neonatal or tooth-germ-induced acute osteomyeli-
pathogens, which are mostly found in the healthy oral tis of the jaws. Because of its risks of involvement of the
flora, have been associated with cases of jawbone os- eye, spreading to the dural sinuses and creating loss of
teomyelitis; however, prolonged antibiotic therapy teeth and facial bone deformities if treated inadequately,
prior to harvesting of the specimen and possible oral this type of osteomyelitis should be remembered. Neo-
contamination complicate the interpretation of each natal or tooth-germ-induced acute osteomyelitis occurs
result. most often within the first few weeks after birth, affecting
A more detailed overview and in-depth information the upper jaw in most instances. This infection showed
on this topic is provided in Chap.7. a mortality rate of up to 30% before the advent of an-
.. Table2.8 Systemic host factors facilitating development of acute and secondary chronic osteomyelitis of the jaw-
bone due to impairment of immune response mechanisms (Modified from Marx 1991; Mercuri 1991; Sanders 1978; Bar-
baglio et al. 1998; Battaglia et al. 1991; Bishop et al. 1995; Cheung et al. 1999; Exner et al. 1995; Groot et al. 1995; Hovi et
al. 1996; Lawoyin et al. 1988; Melrose et al. 1976; Podlesh et al. 1996; Shroyer et al. 1991; Topazian 1994, 2002; Diktaban
1992; Koorbush et al. 1992; Eversole et al 1979; Meer et al. 2006)
Systemic factors altering host immunity
.. Table2.9 Mechanisms of systemic diseases/conditions predisposing to osteomyelitis (Adapted from Marx 1991)
Disease Mechanism facilitating bone infection
Osteopetrosis (AlbersSchonberg disease) Reduction of bone vascularization due to enhanced mineralization, replacement of
hematopoietic marrow causing anemia and leukopenia
Severe anemia (particularly sickle-cell anemia) Systemic debilitation, reduced tissue oxygenation, bone infarction (sickle cell
anemia), especially in patients with a homozygous anemia trait
IV drug abuse Repeated septic injections, spreading of septic emboli (especially with harboring
septic vegetation on heart valves, in skin or within veins)
.. Table2.10 Host factors facilitating development of acute and secondary chronic osteomyelitis of the jawbone due
to compromise of local blood supply (Modified from Marx 1991; Mercuri 1991; Sanders 1978; Barbaglio et al. 1998; 21
Battaglia et al. 1991; Bishop et al. 1995; Cheung et al. 1999; Exner et al. 1995; Groot et al. 1995; Hovi et al. 1996; Lawoyin
et al. 1988; Melrose et al. 1976; Podlesh et al. 1996; Shroyer et al. 1991; Topazian 1994, 2002; Diktaban 1992; Koorbush
et al. 1992; Eversole et al 1979)
Local and systemic factors altering bone vascularity
Smoking Osteoporosis
Diabetes mellitus Bisphosphonate induced osteochemonecrosis
Florid osseous dysplasia Other forms of osteonecrosis (mercury, bismuth, arsenic)
Fibrous dysplasia Tobacco
Pagets disease Radiation therapy and osteoradionecrosis
Osteopetrosis (AlbersSchonberg Disease) Bone malignancy (primary or metastatic)
2 Marc Baltensperger, Gerold Eyrich
tibiotics. The route of infection is considered by most infections derived from periostitis after gingival ulcer-
clinicians to be hematogenous (Bass 1928; Lacey and En- ation, furuncles, and facial and oral lacerations may also
gel 1939; Heslop and Rowe 1956; Nade 1983), although be considered causative.
a local infection caused by perinatal trauma of the oral In some instances the etiology and pathogenesis re-
mucosa and local trauma to the overlying mucosa of the mains unclear or can only be speculated. These cases are
alveolar ridge (Hitchin and Naylor 1957; Nade 1983; To- subclassified as other in the classification system pro-
pazian 1994, 2002), as well as extension of infection from posed in this book.
adjacent teeth or soft tissues, are also discussed (Loh and A distribution of acute and secondary chronic os-
Ling 1993). Staphylococcus aureus has been implicated as teomyelitis cases, according to their etiology and patho-
the organism responsible for this type of acute osteomy- genesis, and their subclassification, respectively, is given
elitis (Asherson 1939; Haworth 1947; McCasch and Rowe in Table2.12.
1953; Niego 1970; Nade 1983; Loh and Ling 1993). The distribution of acute and secondary chronic
The vast majority of cases of acute and secondary osteomyelitis shows a clear predominance of the man-
chronic osteomyelitis involving the jaws are usually dible. In our patient data from 251 cases of acute and
caused by infection primarily spreading by a contagious secondary chronic osteomyelitis only 16 patients (6.4%)
focus. The most common foci are odontogenic, origi- demonstrated involvement of the upper jaw, whereas
nating from infected pulp or periodontal tissue or in- in the vast majority of cases (n=235; 93.6%) the man-
fected pericoronal tissue from retained teeth, especially dible was the infected bone (Baltensperger 2003). The
third molars. different anatomy of maxilla and mandible is probably
Trauma, especially compound fractures, is also a the most important factor explaining the distribution
major condition, which if not treated or treated inade- of osteomyelitis involving the jawbones. The maxillary
quately, facilitates the development of osteomyelitis. But blood supply is more extensive than in the mandible.
also every type of jawbone surgery, including surgical Additional thin cortical plates and the paucity of med-
removal of impacted third molars, inevitably leads to a ullary tissues in the maxilla preclude confinement of
certain degree of local trauma to the bone, which causes infections within the bone and permit dissipation of
local ischemia and may facilitate deep invasion of bacte- edema and pus into the soft tissues of the midface and
ria into the medullar cavity; hence, osteomyelitis can be the paranasal sinuses (Topazian 1994, 2002). Maxillary
established. Especially additional trauma to a preexist- osteomyelitis with tooth exfoliation after herpes zoster
ing chronic local infection carries a great risk of causing reactivation and concomitant cytomegalovirus infec-
deep bone infection. Foreign bodies as well as the various tion has recently gained attention based on a review of
transplants and implants used in maxillofacial and den- the literature and 27 previous reports of herpes zoster-
tal surgery also may harbor microorganisms and hence induced jaw infections (Meer et al. 2006).
facilitate further spreading to the surrounding bone. The mandible is like a squashed long bone which has
Several types of bone pathologies and systemic con- been shaped in a U-form. Like all long bones there is
ditions, as mentioned previously, influence local tissue a clear distinction of a medullary cavity, dense cortical
perfusion and immunity and therefore are important plates, and a well-defined periosteum on the outer bor-
cofactors in establishing bone infection. In rare cases, der of the cortical bone. The medullary cavity is lined by
the endosteum, which, like the periosteum, is a mem- lar condyle, which is supplied in part by vessels from
brane of cells containing large numbers of osteoblasts. the lateral pterygoid muscle and the temporomandibu-
Within the medullary cavity a large variety of cells, such lar joint (TMJ) capsule, the major blood supply of the
as reticuloendothelial cells, erythrocytes, granulocytes, rest of the mandible consists of the inferior alveolar ar-
platelets, and osteoblastic precursors, are harbored, as tery (Fig. 2.6). A secondary source is provided by the
well as cancellous bone, fat, and blood vessels. Bone vessels of the periosteum. These vessels are organized
spicules radiate centrally from cortical bone to produce in a reticular manner and run alongside of the cortical
a scaffold of interconnecting trabeculae (Copehaver et surface, giving off small nutrient vessels that penetrate
al. 1978). The architecture of mandibular cortical bone the cortical bone and anastomose with branches of the
resembles that of other long bones. Longitudinally ori- inferior alveolar artery (Fig. 2.6; Castelli 1963; Cohen
entated haversian systems (osteons), each with a central 1959); however, the value of the periosteal circulation
canal and blood vessel that provide nutrients by means probably cannot be seen as full replacement of the vas-
of canaliculi to osteocytes contained within lacunae. cular supply of the marrow space. Hence, despite this
These canals communicate with adjunct haversian sys- adjunctive vascularization of the mandible through the
tems as well with the periosteum and the marrow space periosteum, the main blood supply is derived from the
by Volkmanns canals, thus forming a complex inter- inferior alveolar artery which, especially in elderly pa-
connecting vascular and neural network that nourishes tients, is a vessel of small caliber and most susceptible to
bone and enables bone metabolism, necessary for re- damage. This context can be transferred to the clinical
pair, regeneration, and functional adaptation. appearance of osteomyelitis of the mandible, where oc-
Acute and secondary chronic osteomyelitis of the clusion of the inferior alveolar artery inevitably boosts
mandible affects most commonly the body of the man- the progress of the infection even if an intact perios-
dible, followed by the symphysis, angle, ascending ra- teum is still present.
mus, and condyle (Calhoun et al. 1988; Baltensperger In most incidences periapical and periodontal infec-
2003). tions are localized by a protective pyogenic membrane
The compromise of local blood supply is the critical or soft tissue abscess wall which serves as a certain bar-
factor and final common pathway in the establishment rier (Schroeder 1991). As mentioned above, this con-
of acute and secondary chronic osteomyelitis (Fig.2.7). dition represents a carefully balanced equilibrium be-
Wannfors and Gazelius (1991) demonstrated by means tween microorganisms and host resistance preventing
of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) that long-standing further spreading of the infection. If the causative bac-
local inflammation of the mandible was associated with teria are sufficient in number and virulence, this barrier
a persistent reduction in blood flow. can be destroyed. Furthermore, permanent or tempo-
Except for the coronoid process, which is supplied rary reduction of host resistance factors for various rea-
primarily from the temporalis muscle and the mandibu- sons mentioned previously facilitate deep bone invasion
.. Table2.12 Etiology and pathogenesis of acute and secondary osteomyelitis cases treated at the Department of Cran-
io-Maxillofacial Surgery in Zurich, 1970-2000, according to Baltensperger (2003)
Subclassification groups of acute and secondary chronic Cases
osteomyelitis
N % 23
Induced by hematogenous spread 2 0.80
Neonatal, tooth germ associated
of the microorganisms. This invasion induces a cascade dren, presumably because the periosteum is less firmly
of inflammatory host responses causing hyperemia, attached to the cortical bone than in adults. When pus
increased capillary permeability, and local inflamma- accumulates continually underneath the periosteum,
tion of granulocytes. Proteolytic enzymes are released perforation may occur, leading to mucosal and cutane-
during this immunological reaction creating tissue ne- ous abscesses, and fistulas may develop.
crosis, which further progresses as destruction of bacte- In mandibular osteomyelitis, the increased intramed-
ria and vascular thrombosis ensue. Accumulation of pus ullary pressure also leads to direct compression of the
inside the medullary cavity, consisting of necrotic tissue neurovascular bundle, accelerating thrombosis and isch-
and dead bacteria within white blood cells, increases in- emia resulting in dysfunction of the inferior alveolar
tramedullary pressure. This leads to vascular collapse, nerve, known as Vincents symptom. The mandibular ca-
venous stasis, thrombosis, and hence local ischemia (A nal is also an anatomical pathway with no barrier func-
in Fig. 2.7; Topazian 1994, 2002). Pus travels through tion, alongside which pus can spread quickly (Fig.2.8).
the haversian and nutrient canals and accumulates be-
neath the periosteum, elevating it from the cortical 2.6.2.2.6 Chronification of Bone Infection
bone and thereby further reducing the vascular supply
(B in Fig.2.7; Topazian 1994, 2002). Elevation of the pe- The chronification of the disease reflects the inability of
riosteum is usually observed more extensively in chil- the host to eradicate the pathogen due to lack of treat-
ment or inadequate treatment, resulting in failure to process because the whole area is bathed in increasing
reestablish the carefully balanced equilibrium between amounts of pus unless treated promptly and adequately
host factors and pathogens found in a healthy oral en- (Killey and Kay 1970).
vironment. In secondary chronic osteomyelitis of the jaws, even-
After the acute inflammatory process occurs and tually a new equilibrium is established between the host
local blood supply is compromised, necrosis of the en- and the aggressor causing the infection. The nature of
dosteal bone takes place. The bone fragments die and this newly formed equilibrium is dependent on host im-
become sequestra (Fig.2.9). Osteoclastic activity is then munity supported by medical therapy and the causative
responsible for separating the dead bone from vital bacteria. It dictates the further course of the infection:
bone. Devital bone tissue clinically appears dirty, whit-
ish-gray with an opaque appearance. Its fatty tissue has If adequate therapy is administered on time, balance
been destroyed and it does not bleed if scraped (Marx is shifted in favor of the host, resulting in complete
1991). In some instances the bone sequester can dem- healing of the infection.
onstrate considerable dimensions (Fig.2.10). If no or inadequate therapy is provided, the disease
The elevated periosteum involved in the inflamma- may progress slowly or faster depending on the num-
tory process still contains vital cells. These cells, once ber and virulence of the bacteria and the remaining
the acute phase has passed, form a new bony shell (in- host defenses.
volucrum) covering the sequester. The involucrum may If the number and virulence of the bacteria are small,
be penetrated by sinuses called cloacae, through which host mechanisms may overwhelm, but still fail to
pus discharges, elevating the periosteum or forming fully eradicate the pathogen. In these instances a
fistula. As chronification progresses this scenario may strong and diffuse sclerosis of the bone with or with-
be repeated (Figs.2.11, 2.12). The involucrum tends to out a significant periosteal reaction can be noted. The
hinder sequester from extruding, which perpetuates the clinical and radiological picture may then resemble
primary chronic osteomyelitis.
Acute inflammation
Inflammation Pus,
(edema, pus formation) organism extension
A B
Haversian system
system/nutrient
/ nutrient
Increased canal involvement
intramedullary pressure
Elevation
Vascular collapse of periosteum
(stasis,
(stasis, thrombosis,
thromosis, ischemia
ischemia
of bone) 25
.. Fig.2.7 Pathogenesis
Disrupted blood supply of acute and secondary chronic
osteomyelitis of the jaws.
PathwayA shows the role
of inflammation and pathwayB
Compromised
Compromisedlocal
local blood supply
the role of pus formation in
compromising blood supply
of the infected bone, which can
Avascular bone be considered as the final com-
mon pathway in the formation
of sequestra (Modified from
Sequester formation
Topazian 1994, 2002)
2 Marc Baltensperger, Gerold Eyrich
.. Fig.2.9 a An OPG of a secondary chronic osteomyeli- pus with adjacent periosteal reaction. bSurgical specimen
tis case demonstrates osteolysis in the mandibular corpus of the case shown in a: multiple sequesters and necrotic
around the alveolar region of the right first molar. A se- bone collected during debridement surgery
quester is noted at the base of the right mandibular cor-
26
Acute suppurative
Subacute suppurative
27
Clinically silent with or without suppuration
.. Fig.2.12 Coronal view corresponding to axial CT scan .. Fig. 2.13 Acute odontogenic osteomyelitis with mas-
shown in Fig. 2.11. (This case is described in detail in sive suppuration. Oral examination at initial presentation
Chap.12, case report6) revealed pus in the sulci of the anterior incisors and ca-
nines on both sides, extending distally to the molars in the
right lower jaw with multiple fistula formation
Predominant sclerosis
.. Table2.13 Acute osteomyelitis: clinical symptoms at initial presentation at the Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial
Surgery in Zurich (Baltensperger 2003)
Clinical Symptoms Cases
N %
Pain 48 100.0
Swelling 43 89.6
Hypoesthesiaa 25 52.1
Lymphadenopathy 5 10.4
a
Hypoesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (Vincents symptom)
b
Only clinically diagnosed sequester formation without use of imaging
c
Cases of trauma/fracture-related acute osteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis of the Jaws: Definition and Classification 2
.. Table2.14 Acute osteomyelitis: laboratory findings at initial presentation at the Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial
Surgery in Zurich (From Baltensperger 2003)
Cases
N %
C-reactive protein
Leukocyte count
Normal 23 60.5
(age 23 years: 600017000;
age 412 years: 500013000;
adults: 380010500)
Body temperature
.. Table2.15 Secondary chronic osteomyelitis: clinical symptoms at initial presentation at the Department of Cranio-
Maxillofacial Surgery in Zurich (Baltensperger 2003)
Clinical symptoms Cases
N %
Hypoesthesiaa 78 38.4
Lymphadenopathy 29 14.3
Pseudarthrosesc 3 1.5
a
Hypoesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (Vincents symptom)
b
Only clinically diagnosed sequester formation without use of imaging
c
Cases of trauma/fracture-related acute osteomyelitis
32
et al. (1996) report of a case of Candida albicans os- with their proximity to the heavily contaminated oral
teomyelitis of the zygomatic bone probably caused by cavity makes them particularly vulnerable.
self-inoculation of spores from muguet plaques on Depending on the nature of the underlying bone
the oral mucosa to the exposed bone tissue by hand pathology, the clinical picture of succeeding second-
contact. The authors conclude that such a mechanism ary chronic osteomyelitis may differ from the average
should be considered especially in patients who fre- osteomyelitis infection established in healthy bone.
quently have oral candiasis (e.g., diabetic, cancer, and The initiation of infection is, like in regular acute and
HIV patients). secondary chronic osteomyelitis, often a trauma such
Cases of acute and secondary chronic osteomyelitis as extraction of a tooth or a dental infection leading to
of the jaws have also been reported by bacteria which breakdown of the periodontal and/or mucosal barrier
are rarely or not considered to be oral commensals. and promoting contamination and deep bone inva-
These cases, however, are extremely scarce, and hence sion of the jawbone. The further course of the disease
the literature on these infections consists mainly of case is, however, strongly dependent on the reactive mecha-
reports. nisms of the host tissue (e.g., bone). In general, under-
lying bone pathology will reduce the defensive abilities
2.6.3.3.2 Secondary Chronic Osteomyelitis of the host tissue and infection may spread faster than
Masquerading Malignancy in healthy bone. Clinical and radiological signs reflect-
ing suppurative infection, such as abscess and fistula
The clinical and radiological signs of secondary chronic formation, are similar to osteomyelitis cases without
osteomyelitis may share many similarities with ma- associated bone pathology. Bone reaction to infection,
lignancy complicated by secondary bone infection like osteolysis, sclerosis, sequester formation, and pe-
(Figs.2.19, 2.20). This may lead to delay definite diag- riosteal reaction, however, may strongly differ, making
nosis and appropriate treatment in certain instances correct diagnosis and determining the extent of the
(Vezeau et al. 1990). infection more challenging (Fig. 2.21). In cases were
Lesions believed to be osteomyelitis that do not necrotic bone is exposed to the oral cavity, secondary
respond to treatment as expected within a short time colonization of the bone and eventual deep bone inva-
should be viewed with concern. The patients medical sion may occur (Fig.2.22).
history, determining possible risk factors for develop-
ing oral carcinoma such as smoking, alcohol abuse, and 2.6.3.3.4 Laboratory Findings
poor oral hygiene, may be indicative, but imaging stud-
ies and representative biopsies should be performed to In analogy to the clinical symptoms, the laboratory
establish the diagnosis (Topazian 1994, 2002). findings in secondary chronic osteomyelitis of the jaws
As much as the presence of a malignancy with inva- are usually less prominent than in acute osteomyelitis.
sion into the underlying jawbone may facilitate second- The overall moderate systemic reactions are reflected
ary infection, the opposite pathway may also be the case by these results and indicate a more localized infec-
in rare instances. Ongoing bone infection may also lead tious process, especially in secondary chronic osteomy-
to malignancy by neoplastic conversion of infectious tis- elitis cases. This is especially true in cases with little or
sue (Lemire et al. 2000; Niederdellmann et al. 1982). mild clinical symptoms where laboratory findings can
be almost normal and hence are of little diagnostic or
2.6.3.3.3 Secondary Chronic Osteomyelitis monitoring value. Examination of our own patient data
34
Associated with Bone Pathology is demonstrated in Table2.16.
osteomyelitis are often summarized by the term sup- term primary chronic osteomyelitis also implies that
purative osteomyelitis, indicating a true bacterial infec- the patient has never undergone an appreciable acute
tion with formation of pus. phase and lacks a definitive initiating event.
The term primary chronic osteomyelitis, as used in The disease tends to a rise de novo without an ac-
the Zurich classification of osteomyelitis of the jaws, re- tual acute phase and follows an insidious course. In
fers to a rare inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. most cases of primary chronic osteomyelitis, periodic
It is characterized as a strictly nonsuppurative chronic episodes of onset with varying intensity last from a few
inflammation of the jawbone with the absence of pus days to several weeks and are intersected by periods of
formation, extra- or intraoral fistula, or sequestration. silence where the patient may experience little to no
The absence of these symptoms represents a conditio sine clinical symptoms. In active periods dull to severe pain,
qua non and clearly differentiates primary from acute limitation of jaw opening and/or myofacial pain, as well
and secondary chronic osteomyelitis in most cases. The as variable swelling, may be observed. In certain cases
.. Fig. 2.19a,b Patient with a squamous cell carcinoma medical history, clinical appearance, and initial radiologi-
of the left lower jaw with concomitant secondary chronic cal work-up (OPG; Fig. 2.19 and corresponding axial CT
osteomyelitis. The patient was referred to the maxillofa- scans in Fig. 2.20) were suspicious for secondary chronic
cial unit approximately 1 month after surgical removal osteomyelitis; however, initial bone and soft tissue biop-
of the lower left second molar with chronic local fistula sies revealed an invasive squamous cell carcinoma with a
formation and pus discharge from the extraction site. The concomitant local bone infection
35
.. Fig.2.20a,b Histology
samples of the same patient
shown in Figs.2.19a and b.
Hematoxylin and eosin stains.
aInfiltration of bone by moder-
ately differentiated squamous
cell carcinoma. Keratinization
in center of tumor cell islands
(arrow). Peritumoral fibrosis
and infiltration by inflammatory
cells are present (arrowheads)
2 Marc Baltensperger, Gerold Eyrich
regional lymphadenopathy and reduced sensation of elitis with involvement of both jaws, which is consid-
the inferior alveolar nerve (Vincents symptom) are also ered to be a unique case.
accompanying symptoms.
Primary chronic osteomyelitis of the jaws almost al- 2.6.4.2 Classification Problems of Primary
ways targets the mandible. In our patient data all but Chronic Osteomyelitis of the Jaws
one case of primary chronic osteomyelitis involved
exclusively the lower jaw. In the remaining case, the As mentioned previously, the classification of osteomy-
zygoma demonstrated the clinical, radiological, and elitis of the jaws, and especially primary chronic osteo-
histopathology findings as the mandible, indicating a myelitis of the jaws, is somewhat confusing, mainly due
possible spread of the pathological condition. The find- to the wide variety of terms used to describe this disease
ings in the literature are similar to our data. Flygare et entity. While diffuse chronic sclerosing or chronic scle-
al. (1997) reported a case of primary chronic osteomy- rosing osteomyelitis are the favorite used terms in the
36
.. Fig. 2.21 a A patient with a clinically extensive sec- periosteal reaction is not as strong as would have been ex-
ondary chronic osteomyelitis of the frontal region with pected from the clinical picture and compared with cases
multiple fistula and abscess formations. The patient was of secondary osteomyelitis of the mandible with no un-
treated with i.v. bisphosphonates for metastatic breast derlying bone pathology. (This case is described in detail
cancer. (This case is described in detail in Chap. 12, case in Chap.12, case report10)
report10.) bA CT scan corresponding to a: The bone and
http://www.springer.com/978-3-540-28764-3