Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
by
DPWH--REGION III
DPWH
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
I
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
II. CONSEQUENCES OF FLOODS
III
III. CAUSES OF FLOOD
IV. STRATEGIES FOR MITIGATION
V. ISSUES AND CONCERNS
VI
VI. PROPOSED PROJECTS
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Central Luzon is one of the most typhoon
yp frequented
q
regions in the Philippines with an average of 4-
4-5
typhoons per year of the countrys average typhoon of
20 per year usually
ll occurring
i b
between
t th
the months
th off
May to December.
The Pampanga River Basin , the 4th ranked river basin in the
Philippines, covers major portions of the provinces of Pampanga,
Bulacan, Nueva Ecija and Tarlac. It originates in the Carballo
mountains
t i andd it fl
flows iin a southerly
th l di direction
ti tto itits mouth
th iin
Manila Bay joining its tributaries
tributaries-- Rio Chico-
Chico-Talavera River near
Mt. Arayat and Angat River in Bulacan. In the middle reaches of
the Pampanga River are two (2) swamps (a) Candaba Swamp
(250 sq.km.) and (b) san Antonio Swamp (120 sq.km.). It has a
total drainage
g area of 10,503 sq.km.
q includingg that of Pasac
River Basin and a river length of 260 km.
(Source: River Maps in the Philippines, March 1997)
Pampanga River
Arnedo Dike
Map of
Pampanga
River Basin
II. THE CONSEQUENCES OF FLOODS
RAPID URBANIZATION and
SUBURBANIZATION is impairing the retention
and detention capabilities of nature
nature.
FLOOD PLAINS being covered into residential
areas and utilized as farmlands increase the
risks of flood damages.
I urban
In b areas, ENCROACHMENTS into i t the
th
natural waterways and drainage main restrict the
fl
flow off surface
f run-
run-off.
ff
III. CAUSES OF FLOODS
LIMITED CARRYING CAPACITY of the river due
to narrow cross-
cross-section (width and depth)
EXTRA ORDINARY RAINFALL
Typhoon Dodong registered 288mm/hr in 2
d
days which
hi h iis 11 titimes th
the average rainfall
i f ll off
27.00mm/hr in 2 days.
SILTATION
INFORMAL SETTLERS AND ENCROACHMENT
GARBAGE
Fl di
Flooding
due to
intense
rainfall
Encroachment of illegal fishpond
Before
After
Informal
Dwellers
Encroachments
Illegal Structures
Encroachment Due to Informal Settlers
Garbage
IV. STRATEGIES FOR MITIGATION
1. Structural Mitigation Measures
Engineering interventions such as dikes,
levees, retention ponds, sedimentation
b i sabo
basins, b works,
k channeling,
h li
DPWH
revetments, floodways, pumping
stations drainage facilities
stations, facilities, etc
etc.
2. Non
Non--structural Mitigation Measures
Flood monitoring,
g, information and
warning system, evacuation system, DENR,DPWH &
hazard mapping, public awareness, land Other Govt.
use planning,
l i capacity it building,
b ildi etc.
t
Agencies
V. ISSUES AND CONCERNS
ARN ED O D I KE
ARAYAT
CAN D ABA
M AN D ASI G
STA. CATALI N A
LAN D AREA
SN . SEBASTI AN
SN . LUI S SET BACK LEVEE ARN ED O D I K E
PAM PAN GA PAMPAN GA RI VER
STA. RI TA
RI VER
CROSS SECTI ON
N T S
SAN PED RO
SN . SI MON
LEGEN D S:
APALI T- ARAYAT SET BACK LEVEE
PAMPAN GA RI VER
APALI T ARN ED O D I K E
SUCAD
ARNEDO DIKE was built in 1940 with a net length of 36 km km. Extending
from Sulipan, Apalit to Cupang, Arayat. It is considered the first line of
defense against overflowing of the Pampanga River.
This levee was designed to contain the bank overflow of the Pampanga River after it
overtops the depressed Arnedo dike. It serves as the second line of defense against
overflow as protection against flood damaged to adjoining barangays of Candaba, San
Luis,
L i S San Si
Simon, AApalit,
lit M
Macabebe,
b b and dM
Masantol
t l
Identified critical areas/sections along
A d Dik
Arnedo Dike
Candaba Pansinao,
Pansinao Buas
Buas, Gulap
Gulap,
Lanang, Pasig and Mandasig
San Luis Sta. Rita, Sta. Catalina, Sta.
Cruz,, San Sebastian and Sto. Tomas
San Simon San Jose and San Pedro
A lit Sucad
Apalit S d and
dS San Vi t
Vicente
Those living in these areas are advice to be alert and forewarned for
evacuation during flood season to seek higher grounds T the Apalit-
Apalit-
Arayat Setback Levee) or get to the nearest barangay hall or schools
identified for evacuation
Inundation Profile of Major River Basins
13 other basins Agusan
130 680 Has.
130,680 Has (12%) 146 000 Has.
146,000 H (14%)
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
V.
V ISSUES AND CONCERNS
(continuation)
6. Disturbed watershed/protected
p areas
(illegal logging)
7 Climatic changes /global warming
7.
Critical Areas along
Pampanga River
Pampanga River
Arnedo Dike
Arnedo Dike
San Luis, Pampanga
Arnedo Dike
San Simon, Pampanga
Critical Areas along Pamapnga River (Candating Section)
Arayat, Pampanga
Pampanga River
Pampanga River
Arnedo Dike
Arayat-Apalit-
Macabebe-Masantol
Setback Levee
Arayat Cut-
Cut-off Channel
Arayat, Pampanga
Critical Areas along Bebe San Esteban Cut-off Channel
Masantol, Pampanga
Pampanga River
Abac
Angele City, P
Allied Projects
Quitangil River
Mabalacat-Magalang, Pampanga
San Miguel Revetment
San Miguel,
Miguel Bulacan
Allied Projects
Allied Projects
Jaen Ri
J River C
Controll
Jaen, Nueva Ecija
Allied Projects
Allied Projects
Sacobia-
Bamban-Parua
River
Ri
Concepcion &
Bamban, Tarlac
Allied Projects
Major Food Control Projects Completed
PDDP I PDDP II
Project
P j t Cost
C t : P 22.99 Billi
Billion Project
P j t Cost
C t : P 88.8
8 Billi
Billion
Time Table : 1993 2002 Main Feature
Main Feature - Dredging : 13,313,752 cum
- Dredging : 12,205,000 cum - Embankment 3,831,504 cum
- Embankment
E b k t A
Arayat
t - Resettlement
R l Area
A 198 ha
h
Total length 15.4 km - Affected Families 6,700
Total Volume 1,898,000 cum - Affected Lots 1,221ha
-Resettlement Area
2 535 llots
2,535 t for
f 70 ha h Protected
P t t d Area
A 142 km2k 2
Population 161,000
Completed Portion (94%)
Length 13.90 km San Flood Mitigated Area 113 km2
B fi i l Area
Beneficial A 100 km2
k 2 Fernando P
Population
l ti 57,000
57 000
Population 71,000
Apalit
Deleted Portion (6%) Reason as to why PDDP II was
Length 1.51 5 km Macabebe cancelled
ll d
Beneficial Area 6 km2 Calumpit The local government units, local
Population 7,121 people and NGOs in Bulacan and
Pampanga are strongly against the
Reason for Deletion Masantol i l
implementation
t ti off PDDP II because
b
Strong opposition by the local Hagonoy Malolos of social issues of the Project
people of Barangay Candelaria Paombong
Macabebe Pampanga up to
Barangay Meyto Calumpit
Bulacan covering 1.5 km up to
the end of the project
PHUMP
Phase I
CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETED
LOCATION MAP
PHUMP
Phase II
COMPLETED
LOCATION MAP
Proposed Projects
LONG TERM
1. Full feasibility study of Pampanga River Basin
2. Rehabilitation/Improvement of Rio Chico River Control
MEDIUM TERM
1. PHUMP Phase III
2 Dredging
2. D d i off P Porac G
Gumaini Ri
River- Lower
River- L D
Dalan
l B Bapor under
d
the Korean assisted Project
S O
SHORT TERM
1. Continuous desilting and dredging of waterways using land
based equipment and government dredgers in coordination
with
ith concerned
d LGU
LGUs.
2. Emergency bank protection on identified critical areas
3. Maintenance of completed PHUMP projects under Phase 1
andd Ph
Phase 2
Status of PHUMP Phase III and WIDENING OF GSO
ROAD AND MEREGENCY DREDGING PROJECT
(Korean Assisted Project)
PHUMP PHASE III ((under the 27th Yen Loan Package, g ,
JBIC)--Flood Control Works in the Pasac Delta including
JBIC)
Porac--Gumain River
Porac
Project Cost: P 4.13Billion
4 13Billion
Status : Approved by the NEDA-
NEDA-Technical
Board and ICC
ICC--CC
Schedule of Implementation: 5 5--yr implementation starting 2006
from engineering design to construction
completion
PROPOSED WIDENING OF GSO ROAD AND
MERGENCY DREDGING OF PORAC- PORAC-GUMAIN
RIVER from its confluence with Upper Dalan Bapor
Project Cost: P 1.56686 Billion
Status : Parcellary Survey was conducted/Awaiting approval
of plans by LMB-
LMB-DENRi/Detailed Design being conducted
S h d l off IImplementation:
Schedule l t ti 2008-2011 (48 months)
2008- th )
Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Mitigation Project Phase 3
MEXICO
CP-1 CP-2
BACOLOR
GUAGUA
Raising of Sta. Cruz Bridge
- 280 m
LUBAO SASMUAN
MASANTOL
Dinalupian
Junction
PDDP I
Apalit
Macabebe
Calumpit
Masantol
Paombong
Hagonoy
Flood
Mitigation
g
Project
Proposal
along Rio
Chico River
Control
Policies
o c es aand
dSStrategies
a eg es