0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
50 Ansichten3 Seiten
Star Chambers of the Supreme Court Victoria attack on the Kable Principle, the Charter and the Rule of Law
Supreme Court: Forrest, Whelan, Emerton, Nettle, Neave,
VCAT Genevieve Nihill, Anna Dae, Grainger, Wentworth, Lulham
Originaltitel
Star Chambers of the Supreme Court Victoria attack on the Kable Principle, the Charter and the Rule of Law
Star Chambers of the Supreme Court Victoria attack on the Kable Principle, the Charter and the Rule of Law
Supreme Court: Forrest, Whelan, Emerton, Nettle, Neave,
VCAT Genevieve Nihill, Anna Dae, Grainger, Wentworth, Lulham
Star Chambers of the Supreme Court Victoria attack on the Kable Principle, the Charter and the Rule of Law
Supreme Court: Forrest, Whelan, Emerton, Nettle, Neave,
VCAT Genevieve Nihill, Anna Dae, Grainger, Wentworth, Lulham
1 ({TT TEU |
Oey | (Re Papelad S-
ja nerf
INTHE SUPREME COURT ORYICTORIA / fife
AT MELBOURNE
IN THE MATTER of an application by Kevin Kelly for an order undér
rule 27.06(3) of the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules
2005
WHEREIN:
Kevin Kelly Plaintiff
JUDGE: ‘The Honourable Justice J Forrest
DATE MADE: I January 2015 |
HOW OBTAINED: In chambers
OTHER MATTERS: A. The Plaintiff sought to file the following:
1, Summons dated 14 January 2015;
2, an Affidavit in Support sworn 14 January
2015 (the Plaintiff's documents).
B. The Prothonotary refused to seal the Plaintiff's
documents pursuant to 27.06(1) of the Supreme
Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules Rules)
on the basis that if sealed, the proceeding so
commenced would be imegular or an abuse of
process.
C. The putative Plaintiff sought a direction from the
Court to order the Prothonotary to seal the
Plaintiff's documents pursuant to r 27.06(3) of the
Rales,
Sy
D. _Itis apparent that if the Plaintiff's documents
were sealed the proceeding so commenced would
be irregular or an abuse of process.
ORDER
1, The Court declines to direct the Prothonotary to seal or accept the Plaintiff's
documents for filing.
DATE AUTHENTICATED: 14 January 2015VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
HUMAN RIGHTS LIST VCAT Reference: H274/2014
APPLICANT: Kevin Kelly
FIRST RESPONDE!
Altorney-General for the State of Victoria
SECOND RESPONDENT:
State of Victoria (Department of Justice)
WHERE HELD: In Chambers
BEFORE: Deputy President G. Nihill
DATE OF ORDER: 24 April 2015
ORDER
‘The Tribunal records that:
1. The following order was made on 30 March 2015:
Having regard to order made on 11 December 2015 and 17 February 2015 and
correspondence from both parties the Tribunal orders that:
Unless the Applicant files particulars of his claim on or before 17 April 2015
then on that date the application will be struck out without hearing.
2. On 17 April 2015 the Applicant filed a document entitled ‘continuing particulars of all
matters before the court of crimes being committed’,
3. Neither this document nor any other material filed by the Applicant discloses
particulars of any claim in respect of which the Tribunal has jurisdiction.
‘The Tribunal therefore orders that:
Under 875 of the Victorian Ci
vil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 the proceeding is.
struck out on the basis that it is misconceived.VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
HUMAN RIGHTS LIST VCAT Reference: H274/2014
APPLICANT: Kevin Kelly
FIRST RESPONDE!
Altorney-General for the State of Victoria
SECOND RESPONDENT:
State of Victoria (Department of Justice)
WHERE HELD: In Chambers
BEFORE: Deputy President G. Nihill
DATE OF ORDER: 24 April 2015
ORDER
‘The Tribunal records that:
1. The following order was made on 30 March 2015:
Having regard to order made on 11 December 2015 and 17 February 2015 and
correspondence from both parties the Tribunal orders that:
Unless the Applicant files particulars of his claim on or before 17 April 2015
then on that date the application will be struck out without hearing.
2. On 17 April 2015 the Applicant filed a document entitled ‘continuing particulars of all
matters before the court of crimes being committed’,
3. Neither this document nor any other material filed by the Applicant discloses
particulars of any claim in respect of which the Tribunal has jurisdiction.
‘The Tribunal therefore orders that:
Under 875 of the Victorian Ci
vil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 the proceeding is.
struck out on the basis that it is misconceived.
Hijacking of The Australian Constitution, The Rule of Law, Murder by Joint Enterprise, Child Abuse and Trafficking, by The Commonwealth and Australian Government
Prosecuting The Australian Attorneys General For The Corruption, Discrimination, & Abuse of Discretion by The Australian Judiciary and Human Rights (Sic) Commission Australia
(Court of Appeal) Prosecuting the Attorney General and the Department of Justice for Denial of Procedural Fairness by VCAT Members, Senior Members, Deputy Presidents and Associate Judges of the Supreme Court Victoria
Discrimination and Vilification by Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Protection of Victorian Police and Court of Appeals Registrar
Corrupt racist australian judiciary digitally raping innocents by giving the middle finger to the administration of justice, and inciting racial hatred to deny equality before the law Re: Intervention Notice: Le Tuan PHAM v Department of Justice Victoria & Attorney General