Congress of the United States
‘Waskington, DE 20515
March, 2085
8, Todd Jones, Director
‘Bureau of Alohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
99 New York Avenue, NE
Washington, 0¢ 20226
Dear Director Jones:
\We ave writing W express uur serious concern with the “ATF Framework for Determining Whether
Certain Projects are ‘Primarily Intended for Sporting Purposes’ Within the Mearing of 18 US.
924{a17HC)," issued on February 13,2015,
‘The proposed “Framework” purports to establish an “objective” test for determining whether certain
projectiles otherwise considered "armor piercing” under federal aw qualify for an exemption allowing
them tobe lawfully manufactured, Imported, and sold on the clan market inthe United States. The
"Framework" however, establishes an unduly restrictive standard, doesnot comport with the letter or
spirit of the law, and will interfere with Second Amendment rights by disrupting the market for
‘ammunition that law abiding Americans use for sporting and other legitimate purposes
‘As you know, the ban on “armor piercing” ammunition was created by the Law Enforcement Officers
Protection Act (LEOPA) of 1986, The Act was conceived to protect police officers from the hazards
presented by so-called “armor piercing” projectiles-rignally designed for aw enforcement and military
‘use—that ean be fred from handguns and penetrate the sor of soft body armor typically worn by police
officers
To do this, LEOPA bans various sorts of non-lead projectiles or projectile “cores” that “may be” used in
handguns. As LEOPA's authors alized, however, bllts fied from most common rifle cartridges can
penetrate soft body atmor, and some ile bullets canbe loaded into ammunition for handguns.
Congress therefore incorporated an exemption into LEDPA for projectiles “which the Attorney General
finds (are) primarily intended tobe used for sporting purposes’ to protect ordinary rifle ammunition
{rom being swept up in the ba.
‘The “Framework” i intended to answer the question of how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives (ATF) will make “sporting purposes” determinations. t creates a two-prong test. Fist,
[ATE will exempt "2 caliver projectile. the projectile weighs 40 grains or less AND is loaded into 2
rimfire cartridge" Second, ATF will exempt other projectiles if they are “loaded into a cartridge for
whieh the only handgun that I really available in the ordinary channels of commercial rade i single
shot handgun." Even then, ATE -under tis supposedly “objective” test— "retains the discretion to deny
any application fora sporting purposes’ exemption if substantial evidence exists thatthe ammunition i
not primarily Intended for such purposes”‘The effects ofthese restrictive interpretations are untenable. For example, since 1986 ATF has
considered the MESS 5.56 x aSmm cartridge to be “exempt” under the sporting purposes tes (although
its core contains a substantial amount of lea, raising questions about Its clasication as “armor
Piercing in the first place). ATF has now rescinded that exemption because repeating handguns that fre
the MESS round are commercially available, Yet this round is amongst the most commonly used inthe
‘most popular rifle design in America, the ARIS, Millons upon millons of MESS rounds have been sold
and used in the US, yet ATFhas not even alleged ~ much less offered evidence ~ that even one such
Found nas ever been fed from a handgun a a police office. The idea that Congress intended LEOPA to
ban one of the preeminent ile cartridges in use by Americans for legitimate purposes s preposterous.
While the banning of these popular cartridges isthe mos visible and immeciate effect of ATFs siting
policy, the "Framework" has other serous implications. It wil, for example, inhibit the development and
Use of rifle ammunition containing nan-lead materials, even as efforts are afoot both atthe federal and
state levels to impose bans or estrietions on lead ammunition, The eventual collision ofthese trends
could resultn drastically reduced options for lawful ammunition users.
"Neither LEOPA nor any other provision of federal law i intended to restric the development of
‘ammunition or handguns that were designed and intended to be used by private citizens for legitimate
‘purposes, Instead, LEOPA shouldbe construed in accordance with the American tradition of lawful
firearms ownership, as protected by the Second Amendment. The term “primary intended tobe used
for sporting purposes” should be broadly understood to incorporate the many legitimate uses
Americans make oftheir firearms including target practice, hunting, organized and casual competition,
training and skis development, and instructional activites.
‘The “Framework” does not comport with LEOPA's mearing and intent and should be abandoned. ATF
should refocus is efforts on serious treats to lw enforcement officers from specially designed armor
piercing projectiles that are intended for use inthe sort of handguns commonly caried and concesled
by criminals. Under no circumstances should ATF adopt a standard that will ban ammunition that is
‘overwhelmingly used by law-abiding Americans for legitimate purposes.
‘Of adsitional concerns the manner in which ATF ised the proposed "Framework The Administrative
Procedures Act (APA) (5 U.S.C 833) requires that "general notice of proposed rulemaking shall be
published inthe Federal Register.” To date the "Framework" has not been published inthe Federal
Register.
In order for Congress to mare fully understand the rationale behind the “Framework” please respond to
the folowing questions by March 13, 2015:
1) How does ATF determine what constitutes the “core” ofa projectile that has more than one
discrete component or section beneath an outer jacket and upon what provision of law or other
Principle is that determination based?
2) Why did the ATF not publih the proposed “Framework” inthe Federal Register as required by
the APA?
3) Under the “Framework,” what other rounds i the ATE considering regulating as armor piercing
ammunition?Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Jason
CCervenak, Senior Counel, of the House Judiciary Committee at 202-225-3951,
Sincerely,
Qk
Bob Goodlatte,Chaieman
‘Committee on the Judiciary
US. House of Representatives
Sensenbrenner, Chairman
ssubemmittee on crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security and investigations
‘Committee on the Judiciary
US. House of Representatives
‘Additional Member signature attached.ee
Be dcbeni
BSE OCC... bila
lapel de -Lild on <
ee . j 1 Mil
“ Cot. [hhaws WL Svedkp be b dhs Ox:
a Hora? Masud i. (ha if ti AZ a 2
: Ell Fan
1 BORE « SRFoe hha Coe, Brit Van
ws On Barbe
M dpig lj » Ke Sang
wre
Bb? fre» | ByesPaul Gosar
Dan Benishek, M.0.
‘Tea Yoho
Randy Weber
Scott Desarais
‘Tom Marino
David "Phi Roe, M.D
David 8. Mckinley, PE
en Buck
Ralph Abraham
Scott Rigel
Joseph Pts
Jackie Walorski
Bruce Potiquin
Mike Bishop
Richard Hudson
Mark Amodet
Bob Gibbs
Frank Guinta
Joho Rateliffe
Richard Hanna
Doug taMalfa
candice S. Miller
Mike Rogers
will Hurd
‘Thomas Massie
Garret Graves
‘Chuck Fleischmann
Bradley Byme
Joh Moclenaar
seff Duncan
‘ion Wale
Mia tove
Jef Denham
Chis Gibson
Rodney Davis
Bran Babin
Ron DeSantis
Scott Tipton
Ryan Znke
‘Tom Price, M.D.
Blake Farenthold
Bill Posey
“4
45
46
a7
8
0
50
st
52
53
5a
55
56
37
se
59
waeeegaaeae
n
a
7
%
n
n
79
a
2
a
24
85
86
Mark Meodows
Bil Flores
Rick crawford
Bilohason
Dan Newhouse
Ron Kina
Doug cons
seftFortenbery
Mike Kelly
sim Jordan
Andy Harris, M.D.
Mike Bost
Randy Neugebauer
Bl Hulzenga
Renee ellmers
Seott Perry
Patrick Tiber!
Alex Mooney
French Hill
Mo Brooks
Roger Wiliams
Diane Black
Jason Smith
Markowayne Mulin
Tim Huelskamp
Morgan Grifith
Rob Bishop
Glenn “GT” Thompson
Robert Hurt
doe Heck
Kevin Yoder
im Bedenstine
Robert Patinger
Barry Louder
Kevin Brady
(Gregg Harper
Jeff miler
Dave Brat
David Schweiker
David Rouzer
Cresent Hardy
Larry Bueshon
Mike PompeogeeeRgeeeesers
BEES
us
10
26
7
ne
ne
Rick Allen
David Valadso
Devin Nunes
Steve Stivers
Daniel Webster
Chis Coins
Jaime Herrera Beutler
Pete Olsen
4. Randy Forbes
Paul Cook
Duncan Hunter
Mike Conaway
‘Steve Pearce
Tim Walberg
John Kline
Blane Luetkemeyer
Robert Lata
Stephen Fincher
Rob Wittman
Tom cole
Gene Green
Doug Lamborn
Ted Poe
Lamar Smith
Austin Seott
‘ike Simpson
‘Matin Stuteman
Keist Noem
Tom Graves
Kenny Marchant
Don Young
Dana Rohrabacher
John Culberson
Steve Chabot
Leonard Lance:
Michael Burgess
cs Whiteld
Colin Peterson
steve King
John Shims
Joe Wilson
Adrian smith
13
BI
a
134
nas
136
ar
138
139
340
1a
a
us
a
as
146
re
at
19
150
ast
ast
158
154
155
155
357
1st
159
16
ast
163
168
165
165,
197
168
168
17
am
m
Darel cca
Bill Shuster
‘Marsha Blackburn
Tim Murphy
Tom McClintock
John Carter
lynne Westmoreland
Mac Thornberry
charles Dent
Jeb Henserling
Pete Sessions
Vern Buchanan
Mark Sanford
Peter Roskam
Louis Gohmert
Vieky Hartzer
John Duncan (TN)
Matt Salmon
Virginia Foxx
John Fleming
Joe Barton
Henry Cuellar
Patrick MeHeney
Walter Jones
Frank LoBiondo
Tom Reed
andy Hultgren
Ed Royce
Sam Johnson
Tom Rooney
‘Ander Crenshaw
Ken avert
Jason Chaffetz
Michael R, Turner
Steve Scalise
‘cynthia Lummis
brett Guthrie
Mike Coffman
‘Aaron Schock
Glenn Grothman
Evan Jenkins
George Holding
Luke Messerm4
m5
m6
m7
me
m9
380
381
182
383
mes
185
186
187
188
avid Young
‘Mario Diaz-Balart
Ayan Costello
Earl L'Budey Carter
‘ann Wagner
Patrick Meehan
‘Martha Roby
sim Renacel
Steven Palasto
Chris Stewart
‘Mack Walker
‘An ickpatick
Cathy MeMorris Rodgers
od Blam
Tom Rice
Barbara Comstock
curt Clawson
Dennis Ross
Robert Aderholat
‘Mimi Walters
‘Mike Mecaul
Steve Ruszell
Lou Baretta
Steve Knight
Martha Mesally
Steve Womack
David Joyce
‘Adam Kinzinger
Keith Rothfus
‘Charles Boustany
“hey Gowdy
‘susan Brooks
Bruce Westerman
Erik Paulsen
Justin Amash
kay Granger
Tod Yours
John Kateo
Paul yan
Sean Duty
Brad Wenstrup
Andy Barr
‘sam Graves
26
a7
218
219
220
2a
22
23
24
225
26
27
228
29
230
za
22
233
24
235,
236
Dave Relcert
Kevin McCarthy
Mick Mulvaney
Frank Lucas
al Rogers
Sanford Bishop
Trent Franks
Greg Walden
Fred Upton
Kevin Cramer
Reid Ribble
Jody Hice
Raul Labrador
Lynn Jenkins
Billy Long
Dave Tott
Robert Woodall
Richard Nugent
David Joly
Todd Rokita
Joho Mica