Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
_________
________________
In the
Supreme Court of the United States
Judy
v.
Obama/Soetoro et.al
PETITION OF MANDUMUS
v.
Defendant-Appellee(s)
Mr. Barack Obama/Barry Soetoro
2446 Belmont Road
Kalorama, Washington DC 20008
1
STATEMENT FOR RELIEF SOUGHT AND ISSUES PRESENTED
Appellant seeks an ORDER from the Honorable Neil Gorsuch directing the Federal
District Court to Grant the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE pursuant to the new evidence,
alleged criminal action upon which relief can be granted, brought to the Federal
District Court by Cody Robert Judy (hereafter Judy) in the MOTION FOR RELIEF OF
including:
Public and Media in White House Press Room. (18 U.S. Code 1028) - Fraud
Article II. Section 1, C-5 unique to the Executive Branch of [natural born
Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents; excludes any form of
Birth] 8 U.S. Code 1401 a-h, 14th Amendment, per Congresss powers in
Time of the Adoption of this Constitution- (Article II, Section 1, C-5) upon
2
female, and thereafter requiring [Citizen Parent[s]] in mutual respect for both
JURISDICTION
1- 28 U.S. Code 2101 - Supreme Court; time for appeal or certiorari; docketing;
stay
(b) Any other direct appeal to the Supreme Court which is authorized by law,
from a decision of a [district court in any civil action], suit or proceeding, shall be
taken within thirty days from the judgment, order or decree, appealed from, if
(e) An application to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review a case
before judgment has been rendered in the [court of appeals] may be made at
4. ....[When the Circuit Justice is unavailable [for any reason], the application
addressed to that Justice will be distributed to the Justice then available who
is [next junior to the Circuit Justice]; the turn of the Chief Justice follows that
a. https://www.scribd.com/document/288645476/Motion-to-Recuse-
Justice-Sotomayor-ie-Judy-v-Obama-14-9396
against Judy in denying his Motion for forma Pauperis for a Writ of
3
Qualified President. Obama/Soetoro as defendant in this case places
22 (4).
BACKGROUND
4- On April 10th, 2017 (Exhibit 1) the Federal District Court issued the following
Denial of the ORER TO SHOW CAUSE dismissing the Federal Criminal Code
denied solely based upon the denial of the Motion for Forma Pauperis
proved Judy was wholly incapacitated financially to making copies and paying
court cost, the Principle Issue of Election Fraud in 2008 and 2012 by an
presented then is as well preserved for this Court today as it was when filed,
accept for the new evidence presented to the Federal District Court in the
Motion for Relief of Judgement and Motion for Reconsideration also referred in
4
part in the Writ of Certiorari filed as an ongoing Criminal Investigation by the
appeal for a Writ of Mandamus in ORDERING the lower Court to comply with
Media Sources which also presents a quandary for Criminal Cover-up by the
takes-new-turn/
b. http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/03/31/obama-eligibility-lawsuit-
takes-new-turn-conclusion/
c. https://www.bustle.com/articles/130896-has-a-candidate-sued-the-dnc-
before-bernie-sanders-isnt-the-first-technically
d. Obama Eligibility/Forgery Lawsuit: Judge Says Defendants Not Required
http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/04/11/obama-eligibilityforgery-
lawsuit-judge-says-defendants-not-required-respond-criminal-
allegations/
ARGUMENT
8- Precedent Case Law Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) assured there
was no doubt that those born in the Country to its Citizens were the [natural
born Citizens] and recalled doubts for those others at the time of birth born
5
under foreign jurisdiction or with foreign parent(s) subject to naturalization
motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, the defendant
must show: "(1) the evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the failure to
learn of the evidence was not caused by lack of diligence; (3) the new
material to the principal issues involved; and (5) the new evidence would
granted." Hill, _ F.3d at _ (quoting United States v. Orr, 692 F.3d 1079, 1099
(10th Cir. 2012)) United States v. MacDonald, 779 F.2d 962, 964 (4th Cir.
1985) [or presumed conviction] added in relation to this Case. (To obtain a
new trial on the basis of after discovered evidence, that evidence must be
Court the original Summons and Complaint were served stamped by the
Clerk of the Court, and it was the Court Clerk who became the scape-goat of
Default. However, given the Court every opportunity, Judy then asked the
warranting a Relief for Judy of the Judgement by the Federal Court, and
warranting a signed Order to Show Cause upon the Defendants to defend the
allegations.
6
11-The Federal Judge in this Case has acted as the Defendants attorney
prejudicing the Judgeship Seat with his own brand of criminal investigation,
speculate as an expert witness, and be Judge, and Jury in his own Court of
ability to defend themselves, or compromises the rule of law and the integrity
of the Court; that no one is seen as above the law in a respect including
Government Officials, and that Justice is available to all whether rich or poor.
May the Courts Justice agree and order the Federal Judge to comply, and sign
the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and all other remedies it may seem appropriate.
13-Submitted this 11 day of April, 2017.
a. Petitioner Pro se /s/ Cody Robert Judy ______________________________
EXHIBIT 1 ORDER
7
EXHIBIT 2 FEDERAL DOCKET 14-00013 SINCE SCOTUS 14-9396
8
9
MAILING CERTIFICATE OF MAILING AFFADAVIT
In compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746 in accordance to Federal
10