Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DOI 10.1007/s11277-010-0082-9
Abstract Both the cognitive radio (CR) and the fifth generation of cellular wireless
standards (5G) are considered to be the future technologies: on one hand, CR offers the
possibility to significantly increase the spectrum efficiency, by smart secondary users (CR
users) using the free licensed users spectrum holes; on the other hand, the 5G implies the
whole wireless world interconnection (WISDOMWireless Innovative System for Dynamic
Operating Megacommunications concept), together with very high data rates Quality of Ser-
vice (QoS) service applications. In this paper, they are combined together into a CR based
5G. With this aim, two novel ideas are advanced: the 5G terminal is a CR terminal and
the CR technology is chosen for WISDOM concept. Thus, the 5G takes CR flexibility and
adaptability and makes the first step through a commercial and tangible form.
Keywords The fifth generation of cellular wireless standards (5G) Cognitive radio (CR)
Wireless Innovative System for Dynamic Operating Megacommunications (WISDOM)
Wireless systems integration and adaptation
1 Introduction
In the recent years the cognitive radio (CR) technology imposed itself as a very good solution
to the increasing spectrum utilization. This technology proposes the development of a new
radio typea cognitive radioendowed with intelligence that senses, shares, and uses the
SOP (spectrum opportunities) of the preexisting wireless networks, the channels that are not
used by the licensed users.
N. Prasad R. Prasad
Center for TeleInFrastruktur, Aalborg University (AAU), Aalborg, Denmark
123
442 C.-I. Badoi et al.
At the same time, a next generation mobile communication network (the fifth genera-
tion5G) is being discussed. 5G has been proposed to bring together the existing wireless
and wired communication techniques into an all IP (Internet Protocol) high performance
world wide network.
This paper proposes 5G through the CR technology: the CR offers the possibility to inter-
connect in a functional way the existing wireless technologies and, thus, it offers a complete
integrated 5G wireless access network.
The paper is organized as follow:
Section 2 describes the mobile telephony standards evolution over the time, and presents
the 5G concept as shown in the literature (features and terminal/network requirements). The
WISDOM (Wireless Innovative System for Dynamic Operating Megacommunications) con-
cept, which is the main 5Gs improvement in comparison with the 4G technology, is also
discussed.
Section 3 presents the CR technology and its implications/changes in the open system inter-
connection (OSI) layers functionality. The section gives the state-of-the-art of CR and high-
lights a cognitive communications world need, as response to the increasing users demands.
Section 4 puts face to face these two technologies, and underlies the similarities between
them. This section demonstrates that the CR terminal can successfully represent the future
5G terminal, and that CR is the best way to implement the WISDOM concept, by integrating
the wireless technologies and make them cooperate. Also, the CR can provide a new control
plane and new protocols, so that the 5G technology functions properly. It also provides a
strong network monitoring, environment adaptation, and performance increment solutions.
Finally, Sect. 5 concludes the paper by giving a short summary of the proposed CR based
5G advantages and the issues to be solved as future works.
2 5G Concept
The twenty-first century is surely the century of speed, and achieves a high evolution in
all the possible domains, especially in communication: a very large variety of services, soft-
ware, equipments, possibilities etc. But this huge and colored offer also brings a complicated
lifestyle and waste of time for the human beings, and needs to be integrated and achievable
in a simple manner.
Therefore, a new technology started to be delineated, that will provide all the possible
applications, by using only one universal device, and interconnecting the already existing
communication infrastructuresthat is the fifth generation of the mobile communications
standards5G.
The first steps were made at the beginning of the 1980s, with the first mobile standards
family development and implementation (the user was able to geographically move along its
session period).
The mobile telecommunication phases as identified in [1,2] (see Fig. 1) are:
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 443
Fig. 1 Evolution towards 5G. Over the last 10 years, the mobile communications have the tendency to inter-
connect all the existing wireless system types, to build a terminal that should support all the voice, video,
and data applications, at very high data rates and users speeds, with the 5G technology as final result. The
figure follows this evolution by taking into consideration the achievable data rates (X axis) and the terminals
speed/mobility (Y axis). With ellipses are represented the 5Gs in time predecessors (see the main arrow)
and the most important wireless technologies (see the secondary arrows), the final goal being an universal
communication technology5G
123
444 C.-I. Badoi et al.
The IMT-A/4G brings more than a 3G capabilities value increase [2], and presents some
fundamental differences.
By definition [1], the 4G is a system of systems and network of networks, fully IP
integrated; if 3G is using both packet and circuit switching communication methods in
order to transmit data, 4G is a packet switching based technology, presenting the IPs
flexibility advantage.
Also, 4G presents a connectivity convergence: (1) heterogeneous access networks con-
vergence and integration, and (2) user terminal convergence. The first convergence type
refers to the possibility of accessing the 4G network via a multitude of heterogeneous
wireless networks: DAB/DVB (Digital Audio Broadcasting/Digital Video Broadcasting),
cellular GSM, IMT-2000, WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network), short range connectiv-
ity with Bluetooth, IR (Infrared Radiation) and UWB (Ultra-Wideband), xDSL (Digital
Subscriber Line), etc.; the second convergence type (terminal convergence) advances
the idea of a smart terminal, able to connect at the 4G network (by selecting the proper
access network) any where and any time, and able to transmit and receive any content
type.
4G characteristics and requirements overview [3,4]:
very high mobility,
higher data rates: 100 Mbps (high mobility)/1 Gbps (low mobility),
large variety of applications and services,
cooperation between different networks/access systems, with an unified architecture
as result,
network detection and network selection (ABCAlways Best Connected concept),
technology and topology independence,
seamless handover and service continuity in case of horizontal/vertical handovers.
Nowadays the most advanced 4G candidate is represented by the IEEE 802.16m [4].
Remark IEEE 802.16e and 3GPPs LTE (3rd Generation Partnership Project Long Term
Evolution) technologies are considered to be 3.9G, not 4G.
By presenting the above mentioned features, 4G becomes the forerunner of a new and
more advanced technology that shall interconnect the entire communication worldthe 5G
technology.
The 5G field was poorly approached by the researchers. The most of the related papers
are trying to define the 5G concept, properties and requirements, and to delineate the 5G
technology over the 4G technology.
In 2009 [5] proposed for the first time in the literature the WISDOM concept, and gave
an in point 5G definition:
4G & WISDOM 5G
The WISDOM principle brings unlimited wireless world interconnection, convergence, and
cooperation (geographically including cities, countries, continents, and finally, the whole
world), together with a large variety of multimedia services at very high data rates, and
becomes the main 5G definition point.
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 445
2.2.1 5G Requirements
The related literature defines the 5G technology, especially by indicating the differences over
the 4G and the necessary improvements needed to accept the evolution towards a new mobile
telecommunications generation.
The main differences are regarding the terminal and networks functionality, as given in
[5,6]:
Requirements related to the 5G terminal:
in order to connect at the 5G network, the 5G terminal must be able to access different
wireless technologies, and to choose the most suitable one (environment knowledge,
information collecting, and, according to some performance criteria, the best selection).
With this aim, the terminal shall include more adaptors, according to the access net-
works (WLAN, WiMAXWorldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access, 3G, 2G,
Bluetooth, etc.) adaptors.
also, for a better performance, the 5G user terminal shall be able to switch on various
technologies, during the same session; each network must provide an user mobility
until the terminal will make a final choice in terms of wireless access systems.
the terminal shall combine different streams coming from different technologies.
an high-performance terminal: better modulation and error correction schemes.
Requirements related to the 5G network (regarding the OSI layers functionality):
the first and the second layers functionality is specific to the selected wireless access
technology.
a total IP integration at the third layer (Mobile IP).
The terminal will have a single fixed address (most likely an IPv6 address) and sev-
eral temporary CoA (Care-of-Address) addresses, corresponding to the access networks
number to which it is connected.
The network layer (NL) will present three sub-layers: (1) lower NL (uses the CoA
address), (2) Middleware NL (performs address translation: CoAIPv6 fixed address),
(3) upper NL (uses the fixed terminals IPv6 address).
the transport protocol is given by the wireless technology (it appears the terminals need
to download and install the corresponding protocols).
the application layer must present an intelligent QoS (Quality of Service) management
over the networks variety.
Remark The 5G network is intended to also be a high security network (an Authentication,
Authorization & AccountingAAAprotocol integration between multiple systems).
The objective of the WISDOM system is to create the enabling wireless infrastructure for
the human-centric communications at very high data rates (up to 1 Tbps communications);
specifically, WISDOM aims to design and develop novel technologies, systems and networks
that shall globally integrate, inter-connect, and communicate into a flexible and dynamically-
operating architecture [5].
The requirements that WISDOM must accomplish (the WISDOM design requirements):
Network protocols and architectures for heterogeneous networks (new physical layer
techniques, MAC (Medium Access Control) and link layer techniques, cooperative trans-
mission, etc.)the observations made in the previous paragraph remain valid.
123
446 C.-I. Badoi et al.
Besides the global integration of wireless systems, WISDOM must provide a wireless-
wired network integration, together with the high capacity satellite links and femto-cells
use.
Applications for GIMCV networks (Global Information Multimedia Communication
Village), that provide applications in all the human life domains: education, telehealth,
community, office, home, emergency care, positions and localizations, etc.
In support of the capacity demanding applications of the future, WISDOM intends to
provide at least an order of magnitude more capacity than any currently planned wireless
radio technology, with a coverage extending from a city region, to a country, the conti-
nents and the world: that is up to 1 Tbps wireless link rate in burst-mode and at short
distances or as system aggregated traffic; and, at least 250 Mbps to the end user, at full
mobility, with a coverage extending from the personal space (the home, the car, or the
neighborhood) to a city-wide region, in a metro-environment.
Higher spectrum efficiencies in smaller cell sizes, with optimized dynamic spectrum man-
agement across different technologies, and the use of heterogeneous access networks in
aggregate.
Improved wireless-wired interfaces with lower overheads to the core and metro network
of the future, as well as the indoors wired infrastructure.
Cognitive radio (CR) and cognitive networking (CN) concepts using both newly freed
spectrum and higher carrier frequencies; we strongly believe that the WISDOM network
(and thus the 5G network) is a cognitive network, and the CR technology is the best way
to implement this concept.
The cognition, sustained by performant adaptation techniques, is the only way to achieve a
global integrated communication world.
Thus, WISDOM provides communication, convergence, connectivity, co-operation, and
content, any time and any where. WISDOM, by bringing together the wireless and wired
communication environments, will offer a total and global IP network: the Future Internet.
3 CR Concept
In the last decade, the spectral resource limitation increased almost exponentially, at the same
time with the wireless technologies development and users number/demands growth.
At this moment, the wireless environment is practically unable to honorably satisfy all its
users.
The CR technology appeared in response to the scarce spectrum resources problem, and its
goal is to optimum utilize the spectrum, and, thus to highly increase the spectrum efficiency.
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 447
in mind: highly reliable communication whenever and wherever needed; efficient utilization
of the radio spectrum. Haykin [7].
CR technology is based on the fact that the licensed systems (also named primary sys-
tems PS) are not always using their spectrum bands; CR brings new radio typescognitive
radiosthat should firstly, identify the existing spectrum holes, and secondly, utilize them
in a flexible manner, according to an access medium scheme.
CRs implications as a new technology, its OSI layers redefinition, and protocols advanced
proposals (see Fig. 2) are presented in the section.
By spectrum sensing, it is mainly understood the CRs capability to detect the available chan-
nels, within the pre-existing systems licensed bands.
As well, the CR must detect the PUs (primary users) behavior and act according to their
intentions; if the CR user detects that the PU wants to transmit in the same channel, it respects
its priority, and quits or modifies its transmission characteristics in that channel.
The spectrum sensing function can be seen as a three steps operation:
signal detection: does a signal exist on the sensed channel? (In this step is no need to
know the type of the existing signal);
signal classification: in the case when a signal exist, is the signal a PUs signal? (the
signal type is usually determined by extracting the sensed signal features);
Remark Only possible in coherent detection.
channel availability decision, based on some criterion or rule: the channel is or not
available?
The spectrum sensing function can present optionally the CRs opportunity to exchange infor-
mation/to communicate with each other (see Fig. 2).
After identifying the free channels, the next step is to share the spectrum holes; this
involves a spectrum allocation scheme which may take or not into account the cooperation
between CR devices.
Spectrum sharing shows how the spectrum is shared and used by the radio devices (CR
and PU devices), in other words the CR access channels/medium techniques.
Based on the priority level of accessing the radio spectrum, the spectrum sharing methods
can be classified in different categories:
horizontal spectrum sharingthe radio devices have equal rights to access the spectrum
(between CR users with same priority value);
vertical spectrum handoverdifferent priorities to access the spectrum between PUs
(high priority) and CR users (low priority);
hierarchical spectrum sharingseveral priorities levels of accessing the spectrum (the
CRs, that are competing for the same available spectrum bands, can have different pri-
orities); the hierarchical access is an elevated variant for the vertical spectrum sharing.
Spectrum handover means the frequency change in order to maintain the transmission up
(dynamically channel switching); in the CR context, a secondary user changes its frequency
due to the appearance of a PU or because of the transmission degradation.
This dynamically frequency change may affect the CRs connection (it can even stop the
transmission); so, it is necessary to design a seamless handover spectrum scheme, and, when
the context is lost, an efficient recovery procedure.
123
448 C.-I. Badoi et al.
Fig. 2 CR-delimitation as a new technology. The figure follows the CR development over the years: a the
CR concept and properties demarcation; b a detailed CR properties analyze, resulting in sub-properties iden-
tification; c research direction to approach in order to achieve the presented properties/sub-properties; d the
performance increasing expected results (see the text explanatory notes)
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 449
In this case (see Fig. 2) the sensed information refers to the environment changes (architec-
tures and topological changes, changes in the noise/interference power, etc.), and not at the
spectrum holes availability status.
In order to adapt to those changes and to maintain a performance constant level (lets
say a constant noise or interference rate), researchers originate an environment adapta-
tion research field; this new approach consists in new adaptation techniques and switching
methods between different CR device configurations and parameters values.
3.1.3 Routing
CR routing research field [8] is based mostly on the CR requirement to interoperate with
different systems, and is strongly influenced by the spectrum sharing techniques.
Thus, new factors appear in the CR routing metrics design:
the CR need to adapt at the preexisting systems (very relevant are the already defined
protocols that run in the preexisting systems);
the way spectrum channels are allocated between the users. See the two arrows finishing
in the routing module (see Fig. 2).
CRNs inherit the PSs (Primary Systems) network characteristics: infrastructure-based,
mesh, ad-hoc, sensor networks, etc.; these architecture types impose a specific routing algo-
rithm, which must also include the CR devices and the possibility for a CR to be a relay node
for another CR.
Influence of the spectrum holes availability variable nature on the CRN (CR Network)
routing technique
According to [9], the time period that the spectrum bands are unused by the PUs impose
a specific routing technique.
Khalife et al. [9] identifies three cases:
(1) the period that the CRs need the spectrum bands is less than the idle PUs period: static
mesh routing (if the idle periods will permit, we will have proactive routing);
(2) the availability period of the channels is dynamically varying in time: new specific algo-
rithms (for example based on genetic algorithms, evolutionary programming, swarm
intelligence, etc.);
(3) the idle PUs period is diminutive than the period that the CR needs the spectrum bands:
opportunistic forwarding without pre-established routes (on demand/reactive routing).
These new possibilities, together with a difficult and dynamic architecture, make the CRN
to be very complex and hard to control.
The CR technology also brings new security and pricing challenges (see Fig. 2):
new security threats appeared at the same time with the dynamic spectrum access concept,
as well as the CRs authentication needs [10,11];
the pricing is very much influenced by the used channel allocation scheme; also, CRs
must be designed with strong capabilities to negotiate the available channels price.
The possibilities to increase the performance are also briefly represented in Fig. 2.
All these above analyzed features (sensing, sharing, spectrum handover, routing, adap-
tation, security and pricing) implemented into a single device, offers a very smart and high
performant user terminalthe CR terminal.
123
450 C.-I. Badoi et al.
System interoperability means that different systems (systems with different transmission
characteristics and different network architectures) coexist and cooperate.
The communications integration concept was engendered mainly by the society needs
and increasing demands; the user wishes real time applications, any time, any where, and
also wants to save time, money and resources; as well, the possibility to successfully face
the special situations (emergency situations) imposed the CR progress.
As it can be seen, the main CR technology advantage is the possibility to adapt and to
cooperate with all the other wireless technologies.
CR proposes the interoperability and integration achievement through Cognition: I
observed my neighbors and now I know their possibilities; I can adapt my behavior to their
needs, and choose the ones that are suiting me.
Thus, CR brings the integration paradigm into the wireless environment, in a high per-
formance level: the CR terminal can download the suitable software, adapt its configuration
parameters, dynamically change the OSI protocols, be connected to all wireless networks
types, and chose the best one to serve its needs.
The result of radio communication technology based on cognition: the CR user can
choose the suitable primary network for its communications, and, very important, two
different wireless networks can be integrated and communicate each other via the CR
device.
The traditional communications systems present (as basic characteristic) the partition into
access-network and core network respectively.
The centralized manner of approaching the communication is no longer responding to the
increasing users demands. Todays communication world shows the need of a more tightly
integrated architecture.
Thus, by its design properties and possibilities, CR technology become the tool to obtain
this integrated architecture (see Fig. 3).
This papers idea is to use the CR technology as the modality to build the integrated 5G
network.
The next subsections will justify this new concept proposal, and will present all the 5Gs
gained advantages/accomplished functionalities, when using the CR technology.
After presenting in the previous paragraphs the 5G and CR concepts, it can be noted that the
essential similarities between them are:
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 451
Fig. 3 Traditional communication versus 5G communicationnetwork architecture. The figure presents the
difference between the existing communications systems (a) and the proposed 5G technology (b), regarding
the network architecture. The 5G essential improvement is that no longer presents the network splitting into
access/core parts, offering, thus, a more tightly integrated architecture in response to the applications and users
growing demands
a very advanced terminal, endowed with the possibility to scan the environment, with
intelligence and decision capabilities;
resources management (an end-to-end integrated resource management that should in-
clude all the networks involved in the data transmission process);
security (new technologies new security challenges).
The mobile radio terminal had a similar and parallel evolution to that of the mobile tele-
communications standards (see Sect. 2.1), being modified and improved at every new added
functionality/service [1]:
By definition, the cognitive terminal is a very smart terminal with possibilities to choose
the proper network from all the existing wireless networks, at a given time, adapt to its
demands, and use its resource. Besides the older radio terminals properties, the CR radio
terminal supports all the data types, on demand QoS, and adaptable data rates (knowledge,
reasoning, and decisions properties).
123
452 C.-I. Badoi et al.
Fig. 4 The CR terminalevolution. The figure presents three main parts (represented by rectangles): the soft-
ware radio (SR), the software defined radio (SDR), and the CR terminals, underlying thus the CR predecessors
and improvements
According to literature, the CR device must also have a strong reconfiguration module,
in order to switch the radio configuration between a number of OFDM (Orthogonal Fre-
quency Division Multiplexing) & DSSS (Direct-Sequence Spread Spectrum) modems and
multiple MAC protocols [12], supported by a flexible and scalable network that enables
management of re-configurable radio information [13].
As underlined earlier (see Sect. 2.2.2), the 5G terminal is a universal terminal endowed
with intelligence, able to: connect and work with any wireless system type, switch on various
technologies during the same session, and support any data type with QoS.
The 5G technology eliminates the radio terminals that are specific to particular wire-
less technologies, and proposes an universal terminal, which should include all of the radio
predecessors features into a single device.
This terminal convergence is strongly sustained by the users needs and demands, and is
successfully found in the CR terminalwhich becomes the ideal 5G terminal candidate.
The CR technology provides to the 5G terminal significant development methods:
a cognitive engine design, based on the cognition cycle, using different techniques,
like genetic algorithms, adaptive mutation mechanism [14], various kind of bio-inspired
algorithms [15], and statistical learning [16],
very advanced CR terminal implementation methods: poly-phase multi-path radio circ-
uits [17], FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) implementations [18], re-configurable
FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) processors [19], MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output)
technology, and turbo and/or nano-scale processing [20],
Making thus the 5G terminal to be the high performant universal desired terminal.
4.3.1 CR Network: The Best Way to Connect and Integrate Different Systems, Architectures
and Technologies
WISDOM means first of all integration, interconnectivity, and cooperation, especially at the
communication access level.
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 453
Fig. 5 CR based 5G. The CR technology is an ideal way to interconnect, in the most flexible and adaptable
manner, the entire wireless medium (2G, 3G, WiMAX, WiFi, WLAN, short range wireless connectivity net-
works, DAB/DVB, xDSL, etc.)that is also the entire world. Until this moment, the CR technology is the
only strong candidate for a good WISDOM implementation, and thus, for a tangible uniform integrated 5G
access network
The technology which should implement WISDOM can only be a technology able to
utilize the already existing resources and communication infrastructures (without changing
them or theirs test procedures, on account of time and money issues), and, moreover, capable
to interconnect the different systems/technologies one to each other.
Thus, it should be noted that WISDOMs implementation demands comply with the cog-
nitive paradigm in the wireless environment:
CR connects and cooperates with all existing wireless networks/systems types, becoming
a liaison technology between different systems and architectures, and thus, making a
first step for homogenize the diversity (see Fig. 5).
CRN architecture type (CR nodes + pre-existing systems) is consistent with the WIS-
DOM requirements (see Fig. 5): WISDOM does not exclude the pre-existing systems
(on the contrary, it integrates them as access systems inside the 5G network).
CRN modelthe CRN presents two sides: the pre-existing wireless systems (WiMAX,
WiFiWireless Fidelity, etc.), and the CR nodes, operating in the free channels of those
systems [7]. Also, the network model is based on multi-hop CRN: this means that we can
have more CR nodes on the route between source and destination.
The primary users networks are not changed, and the CRs work without affecting or
modifying the pre-existing systems.
CRN is a self organizing and self healing network, based on the cognitive networking
principles; these features are 5G essential in order to manage the complexity induced by
a variety of possible usage scenarios, on the one hand, and to minimize the spectrum and
energy requirements, on the other hand.
123
454 C.-I. Badoi et al.
It presents the environment monitoring and adaptation functions (see the following par-
agraph), which are a must for a good 5G network functionality and performance.
In order to offer the services in a personalized form, the 5G technology must know some
primary information about its users: identity, location, and privacy issues.
As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the CR based 5G network includes all the exist-
ing networks types, and the CR technology as binding. Thus, the 5Gs challenge to know
every user context becomes a shared context problem between all its pieces technologies (CR,
WiMAX, WiFi, etc.): how the context will be transferred from one technology to another in
case of a CR user that makes an inter-technology spectrum handover?
At this moment is to soon to advance a stable solution for this problem, given the fact that
CR technology is not yet standardized.
Nevertheless, an aboriginal solution can be suggested:
regarding the old PUs, each technology will maintain its own database (the traditional
case);
for the universal new users (CR users), it must be provided a conjoint database, whereon
each 5G component technology grant access; therefore the CR users information can
be accessed by all the pre-existing communications systems in order to make possible a
seamless spectrum handover.
This primary solution present some disadvantages when considering the joint CR database
dimension and the time to transfer the context.
It is expected, after the CR standardization, to obtain a real-time solution when transferring
the context from one technology to another.
Context-Aware CRs
Beside the inter-technology shared context case (when approaching the CR based 5G context
transfer) an important aspect is also identified: in order to provide the universal interconnec-
tion, the CRs must communicate one each other, exchanging all information types:
personal context (identity, location, etc.);
environmental observations;
sharing preferences: spectrum and technology preferences.
According to all this information the CRs will know to act properly, with the aim of a func-
tional WISDOM, and, further 5G network.
The exclusive CRN (including only the CR nodes, and not the primary systems) is seen
with self-organized and re-configurable capabilities, very flexible and mobile, and able to
cooperate with the existing systems.
The CR self-organized and re-configurable character is determined especially by the nodes
high mobility and location independence (resulting in frequent topological changes), and by
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 455
the spectrum opportunities availability and channels quality dynamic variation in time; thus,
each node should decide the proper behavior, according to its own/and neighbors observa-
tions.
The CRN offered solutions for a self-organized and re-configurable design, till this mo-
ment, are [21]:
Therefore, by implementing the access network in a cognitive manner, 5G will also assume
the CR solutions regarding the manner in which the resource management and adaptation
are achieved.
CR resource management means how the resources are qualitatively and quantitatively
allocated between different users.
According to [25], the CR resources can be classified in three categories: radio
resources, computing resources (that are including the processing capabilities), and
123
456 C.-I. Badoi et al.
application resources (with regard to the CR functionalities). The main CR radio resources
are the spectrum bands (the sub-carriers in CR OFDM based systems) and the power.
Based on this classification, and taking into account the very closed interconnections
between these resources, it was proposed an Integrated Resources Management (IRM).
The resource management assumes a resource admission function (Is it or not allowed
for a user to utilize the resources?) and a resource control function strongly related to the
adaptation (How many/Which type of resources is the user allowed to use in order to maintain
a good performance threshold?):
The admission function has a relevant importance in spectrum sharing, between CR and
PUs (underlay versus overlay approaches), and between concurrent CRs trying to access
the same resources.
The admission function may oblige the CR to stop or modify the transmissions character-
istics, at the moment when the PU will start the transmission in the respective frequency
channel.
The control function implies that the CR users request is honored, but the CR terminal
should always scan the environment and reconfigure its parameters/replace the software
so to maintain a constant performance level.
Adaptation means selecting the proper values (out of a set of values) for the CR parameters,
in order to respond to the environment current status.
The main CR provided solutions, concerning the environment adaptation, are:
(1) power control, which allows to reduce or to increase the transmit power, according to
environment status (the path loss, the interference value, the SNR/SNIR (Signal Noise
Ratio/Signal Noise Interference Ratio) thresholds, the network capacity, the link data
rate etc.).
In order to achieve an efficient power control, a lot of methods/algorithms were sug-
gested, involving different disciplines, like polynomial time algorithms [26], game
theory (cooperative or non-cooperative games [27]), water filling scheme (for OFDM
systems, the sub-carriers are allocated to the users with the best channel quality ini-
tially and then adjusted to improve the system performance) [28], fuzzy logic for
power allocation control [29], a joint power control and admission control schemes
[30] etc.
The adaptive power control domain is a very approached field, and offers a lot of
research opportunities.
(2) link adaptation [31], which consists in:
adaptive modulationthe modulation type selection according to the channel
status (noisy or noiseless, the interference range); for example, for some digi-
tal modulation methods, this implies selecting the proper constellation size (a rich
constellation for clear channels, and a poor one for noisy channels);
adaptive codingoptimal loss-less data compression schemes, in order to adapt to
the previous determined data composition (the data will match a prediction model
and will be compressed according to that model).
The compression is very useful because increases the throughput, allowing to trans-
mit the same data using a lesser number of data bits than without using compression.
(3) adaptive waveform techniquesan adaptive waveform generation and control in the
data transceiver.
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 457
By definition, 5G is a high performance technology (see Sect. 2), with high-band demanding
applications and services, and without time or space limitations.
What performance increase methods sustain a CR WISDOM implementation?
First of all, should be emphasized that a cognitive performance metric is more complex
because of the dynamic, mobile and flexible CR networks nature.
Thus, in the CR domain we encounter at once old performance radio metrics, completely
new metrics based on the cognitive new paradigm ideas, and also a mixture between these two.
The most presented performance metrics are:
interferencebetween CR and PU, and between different CRs;
SNR and SNIR;
channel quality: time varying nature, dispersion of the signal, shadowing, distance loss;
bit error rate;
end-to-end transmission latency/delay;
average detection time: the mean time to detect the signal on the sensed channel;
sensing duration influence on the throughput;
throughput;
capacity limits;
spectrum substitutabilityhow fast is the spectrum handover, with the possibility to have
a seamless handover for CRs;
coverage performancegeographic coverage and range (how long can be the distance
between source and destination in a CRN).
New and original methods, operating in one way or another on the above-listed metrics,
were advanced by the CR researchers:
Reducing the Interference
In order to realize an efficient spectrum pooling between different users, is necessary
to avoid the interference; the first interference cancellation techniques proposed in the
CR domain were: OFDM-based UWB solution (frequency-domain signal processing)
[32], rosettes systems (allowing the utilization of directive antennas, arranged in a cir-
cular form, and rotated each other in order to minimize co-channel interference) [33],
and channel feedback regarding the performance parameters, followed, if necessary, by
some parameters adaptation.
The majority of the studies for reducing the interference are dedicated to:
123
458 C.-I. Badoi et al.
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 459
The 5G based on CR technology proposal, which implies both the spectrum users delimitation
into primary (licensed) users and secondary (CR) users, and the CRs ability to dynamically
use the spectrum owned by primary users, demands new financial and business models.
Both the CR and primary users must gain in the wake of CR technology:
(1) the CRs dynamically utilize the PUs licensed spectrum;
(2) the PUs receive a payment in return of CRs opportunistic spectrum access.
In [41], three models and ways of seeing the spectrum pricing were proposed:
a market equilibrium approach (the CRs demands take priority and the purpose is to
satisfy their needs with the best QoS);
competitive approach (competition between PSs in order to obtain a better pay from
CRit is a selfish behavior on behalf of PSs);
cooperative approach (cooperation between PSs, the best solution regarding the entire
ensemble of CR and PUs).
The pricing field remains opened for research, till the CR spectrum sharing strategies and
other related issues will be finalized.
Though, it is expected to have a game theory based pricing, since the spectrum sharing
was often proposed to be modeled using dynamic game approach.
5.2 Security
Also, at the same time with the CR great possibility to dynamically utilize the wireless spec-
trum and to uniform the communication into a 5G network, new security challenges and
threats appeared, the most of them related to the CR terminals performing [42]:
harmful interference (when both the primary and CR users are transmitting in the same
radio band, the CR user must emit below a given threshold, so that the primary users
transmission to not be affected);
selfish misbehaviors (a CR user can behave in a selfish manner, without taking into
account the others CR users demands and the utilized medium access method, when
distributing the available spectrum between them);
licensed user emulation (a wireless user may pretend that it is a user that owns licensed
spectrum, thus deceiving a CR user who pays for that spectrum utilization);
eavesdropping (the possibility of an CR user to know the data transmitted by another
user, either primary or CR, thereby violating the privacy rights);
complete deny of a CR user (On one hand, an unsecured CR station can be a victim
to potential denial of service [43], and on the other hand can be easily manipulated to
attack legacy and wireless networks [44]).
123
460 C.-I. Badoi et al.
For this reasons, a Trusted Radio Infrastructure for Enforcing Spectrum Etiquettes
(TRIESTE) was proposed to ensure that the radio devices are only allowed to access/use
the spectrum in a manner that conforms to their privileges: restrict the potential violation
and assure the possibility to monitor and to report measurements, in order to punish CRs if
violations are detected [45].
Also, authentication and re-authentication protocols were suggested to avoid the viola-
tions: a CR Radio-Independent Authentication Protocol, Radio-Independent Mutual Authen-
tication Protocol and Re-authentication Protocol (EAP-CRP re-authentication) [46].
As can be seen, even if the CR technology solves the 5G main design/implementation
problems, a lot of issues remain to be approached toward a commercial form.
6 Conclusions
In this paper, the 5G and CR technologies where presented and discussed, then the basic
similarities were identified, and finally 5G network based on the CR functionality has been
proposed.
The proposed CR-5G network is strongly sustained by the main 5G requirements achieve-
ment through the CR use, in a high-performance manner:
5G acquires the desirable terminal, that is precisely the CR terminal.
5G obtains the tool technology to interconnect and integrate all the wireless networks
types, and thus, gains the needed network infrastructure (CRN).
5G adopts (maybe with minor modifications) the already proposed CR protocols and
increasing performance techniques.
In order to satisfy the 5G technology defined requirements, some issues remain to be
solved:
how to reach the maximum 5Gs 1Tbps data rate threshold when using the CR technology
at the access level (CR does not yet offer a very high rate possibility, but the researchers
are trying to resolve this challenge and a high frequencies use was advanced as solution);
good techniques in order to combine the flows coming from multiple access networks (At
this moment, an important number of combining methods exist. Thus, with a attentive
analysis, a proper solution will be found in the 5G case);
how to connect the cognitive radio terminal to the wired networks (This implies new
media interfaces definition between the wireless and wired environments).
Finally, the paper concludes that CR technology is the first step to uniform the different
communications technologies, i.e. to obtain the interoperability between the different net-
work types, and the CR based 5G represents a successful combination which will provide
us the real 5G network.
References
1. Prasad, R., & Lauridsen, O. M. (2007). Convergence of navigation and communication. In An AFCEA
International Symposium on Aerospace Technologies and Applications for Dual Use, Rome.
2. Evolution from 3G to 4G and beyond (5G). http://www.powerpoint-search.com/evolution-from-3g-to-4g-
and-beyond-5g-ppt.html.
3. Tellabs Operations, 4G: the What, Why and When. http://www.tellabs.com/resources/papers/tlab_
4g-whatwhywhen.pdf.
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 461
123
462 C.-I. Badoi et al.
32. Lansford, J. (2004). UWB coexistence and cognitive radio. In IEEE International Workshop on Ultra
Wideband System (pp. 3539).
33. Sydor, J. (2004). True broadband for the countryside [5 GHz cognitive radio]. Communications
Engineer, 2, 3236.
34. Hoven, N., & Sahai, A. (2005). Power scaling for cognitive radio. Wireless Networks, Communications
and Mobile Computing Conference, 1, 250255.
35. Jing, X., Mau, S.-C., Raychaudhuri, D., & Matyas, R. (2005). Reactive cognitive radio algorithms
for co-existence between IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a networks. In GLOBECOM.
36. Ishii, H., & Wornell, G. W. (2005). OFDM blind parameter identification in cognitive radios. In
PIMRC (pp. 700705).
37. Tang, H. (2005). Some physical layer issues of wide-band cognitive radio systems. In DySPAN (pp.
151159).
38. Huang, S., Ding, Z., & Liu, X. (2007). Non-intrusive cognitive radio networks based on smart antenna
technology. In GLOBECOM (pp. 48624867).
39. Azarnasab, E., Kempter, R., Patwari, N., & Farhang-Boroujeny, B. (2007). Filterbank multicarrier and
multicarrier CDMA for cognitive radio systems. In CrownCom (pp. 472481).
40. Chu, F.-S., & Chen, K.-C. (2007). Radio resource allocation in OFDMA cognitive radio systems. In
PIMRC (pp. 15).
41. Niyato, D., & Hossain, E. (2008). Market-equilibrium, competitive, and cooperative pricing for spec-
trum sharing in cognitive radio networks: Analysis and comparison. IEEE Transactions on Wireless
Communications, 7, 42734283.
42. Safdar, G. A., & ONeill, M. (2009). Common control channel security framework for cognitive radio
networks. In VTC (pp. 15).
43. Brown, T. X., & Sethi, A. (2007). Potential cognitive radio denial-of-service vulnerailities and protection
countermeasures: A multi-dimensional analysis and assessment. In CrownCom (pp. 456464).
44. Sampath, A., Dai, H., Zheng, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2007). Multi-channel jamming attacks using cognitive
radios. In ICCCN (pp. 352357).
45. Xu, W., Kamat, P., & Trappe, W. (2006). TRIESTE: A trusted radio infrastructure for enforcing
SpecTrum etiquettes. In SDR (pp. 101109).
46. Nomura, R., Kuroda, M., & Mizuno, T. (2007). Evaluation of EAP based re-authentication protocol
for high-speedvehicular handover in cognitive radio networks. In CrownCom.
Author Biographies
123
5G Based on Cognitive Radio 463
123
464 C.-I. Badoi et al.
123