Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Jordan Dagenais
Abstract
This study looks into articles from both popular media and scientific journals and seeks to
answer the question of why there is a divide between the information being presented. This is
being done through the claim that there is a certain amount of time that a person can perform
meditation for before they start to see physical results. I chose to research this topic because it is
a claim I have often sought the answer to, only to find that there are many possible answers.
How Different Medias Address the Science of Yoga 3
Since approximately 1500 B.C.E., humans have taken part in meditative practices for
destressing, meditation is practiced by millions of people across the world. However, despite its
common use by many people, there are a lot of conflicting reports or just what the benefits of
meditation are. This is due to the relative lack of research that has been done on the subject. But
there are several benefits most people can agree on: meditation reduces stress and anxiety, helps
keep you present in the moment, and increases your bodys immunity.
One of the aspects of meditation that is often contested is two-fold: how long a person
should do meditation for in one session to see results, and how long a person should practice
meditation for before they start to see results. With the age of the internet, everyone can voice
their opinion about this concept. As a result, there are many conflicting reports on the matter.
Two commonly conflicting areas are popular media and scientific journals. This essay seeks to
discover the differences between the results found by these two mediums and figure out why
Literature Review
The New York Times article How Meditation Changes the Brain and Body claims that
after only three days of meditation participants were able to feel differences in their bodies,
stating that they felt noticeably refreshed. 35 unemployed men and women undergoing
considerable stress were used for this experiment. Half practiced real meditation while half
practiced fake meditation. After the three days, only changes could be seen in the brain scans of
those that did real meditation. An obvious flaw in this research is the amount of time that the
How Different Medias Address the Science of Yoga 4
study was conducted for. Three days isnt enough time to draw the kinds of conclusions that they
are. While the study was performed by a doctor from a reputable university, the length of the
study and lack of controls on the participants (i.e. there are other factors that affect stress) lead
me to believe that this article supports the claim that there is a definitive amount of meditation
The Huffington Post article Harvard neuroscientist: Meditation not only reduces stress,
heres how it changes your brain is more conducive to proper research. The scientist in the
study used several markers of good research: a control group, continuous scans of the brain, and
a follow up study. All of this combined led the study to show that it takes eight weeks for one to
see changes from doing meditation. This supports the claim that the exact amount of meditation
Discrimination and Sustained Attention claims that changes in the brain can be seen after
sustained meditation for three months. This study has many good practices in it. A control group
was used, the actions of the participants were controlled and standardized, and a long period of
time was used to ensure that the initial results werent just a coincidence. Despite this, the study
does not support the claim being investigated. While three months was used as the length of the
study, the resulting brain scans showed different amounts of change in gray matter for different
people. As a result, it could be argued that they all began seeing changes at different times.
An article from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
Practitioners, took the results seen in previous studies a step further by comparing brain changes
How Different Medias Address the Science of Yoga 5
between novices and experienced meditators. Their research showed that the amount of changes
in the brain that occur in a novice are greater than that in an experienced meditator. Exact
amounts of meditation time and control groups help to verify these results. The study goes
further to conclude that there is plasticity in the mechanisms of the brain, causing different
amounts of change for different people. This directly contradicts the claim being researched.
Discussion
It is clear from the popular media sites and may others that quick answers are the name of
the game. People researching meditation practices on popular media sites want to find what they
are looking for quickly, and often arent interested in much of the why? and how?. They
simply go online and search for something pertaining to how long they should do meditation for
before they see results and go with one of the first answers they find. Despite the ease of access
to information, scientific journals prove that it can be dangerous to believe the first piece of
While popular media seeks to give people the quickest answers possible, scientific
journals seek to give people the most accurate and scientifically backed answers possible. The
articles used for this study come from the journals Psychological Science and Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Like the popular media articles
discussed above, these journals have an adequate amount of credibility. However, they differ in
that they have more controls in their research, their research goes deeper, and they draw more
profound conclusions, this proving that there is a divide between different medias and their
assessments of meditation.
How Different Medias Address the Science of Yoga 6
The largest limitation to these studies is that they are only taken from a handful of
sources. If the research scope was widened to include other types of media, it is possible that
different conclusions could be found. However, I believe that the current scope of the research
A second limitation could be found in the use of technology. Library databases and a
standard search engine were the only avenues used to find information. This could cause a skew
in information that would not be noticed unless other research methods were used.
A third limitation that has occurred is the lack of a definition for the term physical
results. As seen in the several studies reviewed above, there are many different effects that
meditation has on the entire body. This study could have been more refined by limiting physical
Based on the research presented in the scientific journals, there is no good answer to the
questions regarding meditation. They show that a combination of a lack of research in this field
and the simple fact that everyones body is very different make it impossible to settle on just one
number.
Clearly, there is no short answer to how long someone should meditate for before they
see results. Even if one was to listen to the popular media articles, based on what we can learn
from scientific journals, everyones body differs and they wont be very accurate anyway.
Unfortunately, there is no easy way to fix this divide. With the age of the internet, people can
access information very quickly. As a result, people want information as fast as possible. Until
we are able to find a way to bridge the gap between popular and scientific media, this divide will
continue to get worse. It is up to everyone to find ways to want to learn the most information
possible, instead of what is most convenient. In addition to helping to fight this cause, I hope to
one day just how much time it takes to see physical results from doing meditation.
How Different Medias Address the Science of Yoga 8
Works Consulted
Brefczynski-Lewis, J. A., Lutz, A., Schaefer, H. S., Levinson, D. B., & Davidson, R. J. (n.d.).
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (27th
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25436140?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=m
editation&searchText=brain&searchText=change&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSea
rch%3FQuery%3Dmeditation%2Bbrain%2Bchange%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26am
p%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3Bwc%3Don&seq=1#page_scan_tab
_contents
MacLean, K. A., Ferrer, E. et al (n.d.). Psychological Science (6th ed., Vol. 21). Retrieved
http://www.jstor.org/stable/41062297?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=m
editation&searchText=brain&searchText=change&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSea
rch%3Ffc%3Doff%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3BQuery%3Dmeditation%2Bb
rain%2Bchange%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bwc%3Don&seq=1#page_scan_tab
_contents
McGreevey, S. (2011, January 21). Eight Weeks to a Better Brain. Retrieved February 23, 2017,
from http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2011/01/eight-weeks-to-a-better-brain/
Posner, M. I., Tang, Y., et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America (22nd ed., Vol. 106). Retrieved February 23, 2017, from
How Different Medias Address the Science of Yoga 9
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40482780?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=m
editation&searchText=brain&searchText=change&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSea
rch%3Fwc%3Don%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3BQuery%3Dmeditation%2B
brain%2Bchange%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff&seq=1#page_scan_tab
_contents
Reynolds, G. (2016, February 18). How Meditation Changes the Brain and Body. Retrieved
https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/02/18/contemplation-therapy/?_r=0
Schulte, B. (2015, May 26). Harvard neuroscientist: Meditation not only reduces stress, heres
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2015/05/26/harvard-neuroscienti
st-meditation-not-only-reduces-stress-it-literally-changes-your-brain/?utm_term=.043615
9e9f93