Aurecon New Zealand Limited T +64 9 520 6019

Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road F +64 9 524 7815

Newmarket Auckland 1023 E auckland@aurecongroup.com
PO Box 9762 W aurecongroup.com
Newmarket Auckland 1149
New Zealand

Memorandum
To Damien McGahan From Amanda Pryce
Verifier Norman Lea
Mel Taylor, Richard Bollard, Craig
Approver David Anderson
Copy Fitzgerald, James Whitlock, Craig
Stevenson CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-
Reference
0018
Pages (including
Date 13 November 2014 this page)
15
Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment: Assessment of Vibration Effects on
Subject
Buildings

1 Introduction
This memorandum provides details of the vibration predictions, building risk assessments and
proposal for monitoring of the potential vibration effects on buildings associated with the Albert Street
Stormwater Main Realignment (The Project). The building risk assessment outlines the potential
impact of the assessed ground vibrations on adjacent building structures and identifies potentially at
risk buildings. The monitoring proposal outlines the methods in which the ground and adjacent
structures may be monitored in order to verify the assessment assumptions and provide control and
confidence during construction.

This Assessment of Vibration Effects on Buildings is an appendix to the Assessment of Effects on the
Environment (AEE) which supports the resource consent applications to be lodged by Auckland
Transport (AT) with Auckland Council (AC) for the construction of the Albert Street Stormwater Main
Realignment and to locally strengthen a section of the Orakei Main Sewer (OMS), a wastewater trunk
main.

Aurecon confirms that the content of this report has been written with reference to the Design
Description set out in the Design and Construction Report Albert Street Stormwater Main
1
Realignment (DCR) .

This memorandum should be read in conjunction with the Albert St Stormwater Realignment
Construction Noise and Vibration Assessment (N & V Report) prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics
2
(MDA) .

2 Project Description
These works are required as a result of the City Rail Link (CRL) tunnel alignment. The proposed CRL
tunnels conflict with the existing Albert Street Stormwater Main, and passes in close proximity to the
crown of the OMS.

The existing Albert Street Stormwater Main is aligned beneath Albert Street between Wellesley Street
and Customs Street. As a result of the proposed construction of the CRL project tunnel, the existing
Albert Street Stormwater Main will be removed which means that it needs to be realigned prior to the
excavation of the proposed CRL project tunnel starting in Albert Street. The realignment of the Albert
Street Stormwater Main will occur along Albert Street between Wellesley Street and Swanson Street

1
CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0005 Design and Construction Report Albert Street Stormwater Main
Realignment Aurecon New Zealand Limited
2
Albert St Stormwater Realignment Construction Noise and Vibration Assessment 13 November
2014 by Marshall Day Acoustics

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 1
where connections can be made to existing stormwater mains. The section of the Albert Street
Stormwater Main between Swanson Street and Customs Street can be removed without realignment.

The Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment will involve the construction of approximately 520m of
new 1950mm diameter stormwater pipe constructed by pipe jacking (this works will be referred to as
the realigned Albert Street Stormwater Main in this memorandum). The pipe jacking operation will be
undertaken using a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) with slurry system. The realigned Albert Street
Stormwater Main will be located on the eastern edge of the Albert Street road reserve, outside the
proposed corridor of the future CRL project tunnels. The Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment
will also involve the construction of a pipe jacking launch shaft which will be constructed at Victoria
Street, and pipe jacking retrieval shafts which will be constructed at Wellesley Street and Swanson
Street.

Associated works involve the strengthening of the OMS, which is required to support the OMS during
the construction of the proposed CRL project tunnel. These strengthening works involve inserting
glass reinforced pipe (GRP) sections in the crown of the OMS to ensure it is supported to prevent a
failure. In order to gain access to the OMS to complete the strengthening works, a shaft is proposed to
be constructed at Victoria Street on the west side of Albert Street.'

A complete overview, scope of works, and programme for the Project is described in the DCR. In
particular, the DCR outlines the proposed construction methodology and staging, and provides a
description of the locations where construction and operation will have potential and actual effects on
the existing environment.

3 Limitations of Study
This memorandum has relied on the available project information to date and other existing
3
documentation, including the N & V Report, Heritage Impact Assessment , DCR and previous project
studies. Reliance has been placed on the accuracy and veracity of the documents made available and
referenced within this study. The study is limited to desktop research and walking visual surveys
(exterior only) of representative buildings along the proposed route.

4 Purpose of this Report

The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of the ground vibration analysis/predictions
due to the construction works, and the subsequent assessment of the effects on adjacent buildings.
Monitoring and mitigation measures for these potential effects have been proposed where required.

This memorandum will review the existing environment and the buildings which are envisaged to be
affected by the works. A monitoring regime and potential mitigation and contingency measures are
then proposed to address these potential effects during and after construction, if required.

It has been identified that existing buildings, within the construction vibration threshold contours (refer
to Appendix A) and as identified in the N & V Report, may be at risk of sustaining damage from
vibration due to the construction works. It is noted in the N & V Report however that DIN 4150-
4
3:1999 [the standard adopted for assessment purposes] is a conservative standard. Its criteria are
designed to avoid superficial damage to buildings (such as cracking in paint or plasterwork) and are
5
well below the levels at which damage to building foundations would typically occur.

3
Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment. Heritage Impact Assessment Salmon Reed Architects
4
DIN 4150-3 1992 Structural Vibration Part 3: Effects of Vibration on Structures
5
Albert St Stormwater Realignment Construction Noise and Vibration Assessment 13 November
2014 by Marshall Day Acoustics

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 2
5 Existing Environment
The following sections outline the environment surrounding the works. This information is essential for
appropriate assessment of the effects on surrounding structures.

The Auckland city centre area is a built up urban environment and is New Zealands largest city centre
and commercial / business area. It is a centre of business, art, culture, entertainment, recreation,
education, tourism and residential living. The city centre area has a less definite relationship between
an activity and the building it may occupy compared to other parts of Auckland.

Land uses above the ground for the Project route include high density commercial and office buildings,
residential and visitor accommodation, retail, restaurants and bars.

The types of buildings encountered along and adjacent to the Project route are many and disparate.
They range from modern multi-storey piled structures to low-rise heritage brick masonry buildings on
shallow foundations. Building uses comprise a mix of residential, historic, religious, entertainment,
commercial and retail. For the purposes of assessing susceptibility to the effects of construction
vibration these buildings have been grouped into two types based on their foundations and
construction, which are defined below.

5.1 Shallow Foundation Buildings

Buildings defined in this category are constructed typically of unreinforced masonry and founded on
shallow pad or strip footings. These buildings are typically more sensitive to vibrations and commonly
include scheduled heritage structures. Mixed foundations are also considered to fall within this
category.

5.2 Piled Buildings

Buildings defined in this category are typically of more modern framed structures and are founded on
piles. These buildings are still sensitive to vibrations however they are generally less critical than
buildings with shallow foundations.

6 Vibration Assessment Methodology

6.1 Vibration Assessments

An assessment of vibration effects for this project has been undertaken by MDA, and is relied upon in
this assessment. Reference is made to the N & V Report for details of the vibration performance
criteria adopted for the Project and the methodology for assessing the effects of vibration on buildings.

6.2 Structural Damage Vibration Impact Criteria

The German standard DIN 4150 Structural Vibration Part 3: Effects of Vibration on Structures has
been adopted by MDA to address building damage risk in their N & V report. Refer to this report for
further details.

The key criteria of DIN 4150-3:1999 (Table 1 and 3 of the standard) are listed below. The criteria are
expressed as peak particle velocities (PPV) in mm/second.

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 3
Table 6.1 - DIN 4150.3: Table 1: Guideline values for vibration velocity to be used when evaluating the effects of short-
term vibration on structures.

Table 6.2 - DIN 4150.3: Table 3 - Guideline values for vibration velocity to be used when evaluating the effects of long-
term vibration on structures.

The most relevant criteria in this standard which has been adopted by MDA in their assessment is the
long-term vibration limits of DIN 4150-3 Table 3, as the majority of the Project construction vibration
activities would be classed as long term in accordance with the definition in the standard.

DIN 4150:3 states that: Experience has shown that if these values are complied with, damage that
reduces the serviceability of the building will not occur. If damage nevertheless occurs, it is to be
assumed that other causes are responsible.

DIN 4150:3 also states that exceeding the values above does not necessarily lead to damage. Should
these values be significantly exceeded, however, further investigations are necessary.

In practice even cosmetic damage such as the forming of cracks does not always occur from typical
construction activities below 15mm/s. The British Standard BS 7385 -2 1993 Evaluation and
Measurement for Vibration in Buildings - Part 2: Guide to Damage Levels from Ground borne
6
Vibration suggests that the probability of damage tends towards zero at 12.5mm/s PPV.

6
BS 7385 -2 1993 Evaluation and Measurement for Vibration in Buildings- Part 2: Guide to Damage
Levels from Groundborne Vibration

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 4
6.3 Adjustment Factors
The criteria of Table 3 of DIN 4150-3 are applicable to the upper floors of a building and not
necessarily to ground borne vibration at foundation level. The building structure will have some effect
on the level of vibration that propagates up through a building.

Ground vibration entering building foundations is dependent on the coupling of the building to the soil.
Coupling losses can usually be expected. The general principle is the heavier the building
construction, the greater the coupling loss or reduction in vibration entering a building.

Vibration generally reduces in level as it propagates through a building, with dispersion and
attenuation of the driving vibration energy as it dissipates through the building. Counteracting this,
resonance of the building structure, particularly the floors, will cause some amplification of the
vibration. The amplification will vary greatly depending on the type of construction. It is dependent on
both the frequency spectrum of the vibration and the natural frequency of components of the building
structure.

For the purpose of assessing the impact of vibration on existing buildings and developing a reasonably
complete inventory of buildings potentially impacted by vibration, the criteria of Table 3 of DIN 4150-3
have been adopted by MDA as that appropriate to ground-borne vibration at the building foundation
level. This is considered a reasonable, if not conservative approach, for a general assessment of
potential vibration effects on buildings. These threshold criteria are similar to recommendations of
7
FTA-VA-90-1003-06 and are somewhat less than the guide values of BS7385-2:1993 which are
judged to give a minimal risk of vibration induced damage.

6.4 Vibration Assessment Results

The results of the vibration propagation assessments undertaken by MDA are detailed in their N & V
Report. MDA have provided vibration regression curves and emission radii for three types of vibration
sources (excavator, pipe jacking and rotary bored pile). These have been developed using the
vibration thresholds of 2.5mm/s, 5mm/sec and 10mm/sec, these being the vibration criteria or
threshold appropriate to heritage or sensitive structures; residential; and commercial buildings
respectively. For the purposes of this assessment, heritage buildings are defined as those identified in
the Heritage Impact Assessment; and sensitive structures defined as all buildings constructed with
unreinforced masonry.

Figure 2 and Table 6 from the MDA N & V Report are reproduced below for reference.

7
Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment FTA-VA-90-1003-06, Federal Transit
Administration, May 2006.

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 5
Figure 6.1 - Figure 2 from the MDA N & V Report

Table 6.3 - Table 6 from the MDA N & V Report

Vibration contour drawings have been produced from the results of the MDA assessment of expected
vibration emissions along the Project route (pipe jacking) and at the vertical shafts (rotary bored
piling followed by excavator) resulting from construction activities, and have been included in
Appendix A of this memorandum.

The contours have been calculated and documented at both ground level and at 10m below ground,
with contours included for each of the vibration thresholds of 2.5mm/s, 5mm/sec and 10mm/sec, these
being the vibration criteria or threshold appropriate to historic or sensitive; residential; and commercial
buildings respectively. The ground level contours are relevant to shallow founded buildings whilst
those at 10m depth are also judged relevant to piled buildings or buildings with significant basement
structures that may be in proximity to the Project works below ground.

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 6
7 Assessment of Vibration Effects

7.1 Inventory of Impacted Buildings

An inventory of those buildings that are within the emissions radii where the relevant vibration
threshold criterion is exceeded and have the potential to be impacted by ground vibrations has been
made. These at risk buildings have been categorised as heritage and/or sensitive, residential, or
commercial which is consistent with the project criteria categories for which the predicted propagation
contours have been produced.

An inventory of buildings potentially subject to vibration effects during construction is listed in Table
7.1, and have also been mapped on the Construction Vibration Contour Drawings in Appendix A.

Table 7.1 Buildings along the pipe jacking route exceeding relevant vibration thresholds

ID St. No Street Building Category Foundation Type

1 12-26 Swanson Street Commercial Shallow

2 70-74 Albert Street Residential Piled
3 76-84 Albert Street Residential Piled
4 51-63 Victoria Street West Sensitive Shallow
5 98-102 Albert Street Sensitive Shallow
6 43 Victoria Street West Sensitive Shallow
7 120 Albert Street Commercial Piled
8 128 Albert Street Residential Piled
9 15-31 Wellesley Street West Heritage Shallow
10 37 Wellesley Street West Residential Piled
11 32-42 Wellesley Street West Sensitive Shallow

7.2 Effects Categorisation

The predicted level of physical effects on at risk buildings can be categorised using the widely
8
accepted Burland Classification shown in Table 7.2 below.

8
Burland J B (1995), Closing Ceremony, Proc. 1st IS-Hokkaido 94, 2, pp. 703-705.

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 7
Table 7.2 - Building Damage Classification

7.3 Risks and Effects on Impacted Buildings

As described in the sections above, it is recognised that the applied damage criteria adopted by MDA
is conservative in respect to the onset of damage. Exceedance of the threshold criteria may at worst,
but not necessarily, result in some damage to buildings. It is not expected that any building will exceed
the Slight category described in Table 7.2 above, and the majority of affected buildings will be in the
Very Slight or Negligible category. That is, any damage that occurs is expected to be limited to
aesthetic damage only, with no serviceability or structural damage expected. The anticipated building
damage effects will potentially include cracks up to 5mm that can easily be filled, with redecoration
potentially required; slight internal fractures; some visible exterior cracks which may require some
repainted for weather-tightness; and doors and windows may stick slightly.

8 Monitoring, Mitigation and Contingency Measures

8.1 Monitoring
Monitoring of the buildings and actual ground vibrations is essential to demonstrate the performance
of the shaft excavation and pipe jacking activities, to confirm the predictions for the assumed ground
conditions and to control the potential effects on adjacent structures. Monitoring will be required before
construction commences, during construction and following completion of the works to provide
comprehensive information on the effects of the construction works. The following sections outline the
methodology of the monitoring in relation to potential building damage.

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 8
8.1.1 Building Condition Surveys

Pre-Construction Surveys
Individual preconstruction structural condition surveys will be carried out on buildings based on the
following criteria:

Buildings identified as being at risk of vibration induced damage, as outlined in Table 7.1.

The initial survey will comprise an inspection of each building to establish and record its existing
condition. Each survey report will include a written description including photographs of any existing
damage. These surveys will be carried out prior to the commencement of the construction works,
providing a baseline of the condition of each building. Buildings identified in a state of dilapidation may
require further engineering involvement in the form of detailed assessments and possible
strengthening prior to the commencement of the construction works.

During Construction Surveys

Monthly visual inspections are to be undertaken during this phase of the project if requested by the
building owner at properties where a pre-construction condition survey has been undertaken. The
purpose of the ongoing inspections will be to look for any evidence of effects, with reference to the
initial baseline condition survey. Surveys of other buildings will be included where the ongoing
monitoring indicates that there may be a significant increase in the vibration effects to those estimated.

Post-Construction
Following completion of construction, post-construction building condition surveys shall be carried out
on buildings where a building condition survey was undertaken during the construction phase. The
survey report shall include an assessment of the cause of the damage identified (if any). The
requirements of this condition need not be fulfilled for any particular building where the Contractor can
provide reasonable evidence to AT and AC that the current owner of that building has agreed they do
not require such survey.

Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms that the building has deteriorated as the
result of the construction works, remedial work will be required to rectify the damage. Such repairs
shall be undertaken as soon as practicably possible and in consultation with the owner of the building.

8.2 Mitigation
This assessment has not identified any buildings with a building damage criteria greater than Slight
degree of severity, which is limited to the possibility of aesthetic damage and cracking as described in
the sections above. As such, structural building damage (including 'serviceability' and 'stability'
damaged as defined in Table 7.2 above) is unlikely and not expected on this project.

8.3 Contingency Measures

If any effects of a structural nature are identified during the building condition surveys then a detailed
assessment will be required by a structural engineer. Any recommendations for repair and increased
monitoring arising from this assessment will then be implemented. In the highly unlikely event where
local repairs are not sufficient, then additional works such as underpinning, strengthening or propping
of the building may be required.

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 9
9 Conclusion
Vibration analysis was undertaken for the Project which included analysis of the proposed pipe jacking
and four shaft excavations. Vibration emission radii were obtained from the N & V Report and used to
produce contour maps at ground level and at 10m below ground level. These were developed using
the vibration thresholds of 2.5mm/s, 5mm/sec and 10mm/sec, these being the vibration criteria or
threshold appropriate to heritage or sensitive structures; residential; and commercial buildings
respectively (based on DIN 4150-3:1999). These vibration contour maps were then used to determine
which buildings will be potentially subject to vibration effects during construction.

In summary, it is not expected that any building will exceed the Slight category described in Table
7.2 above. That is, any damage that occurs is expected to be limited to aesthetic damage only, with no
serviceability or structural damage expected.

Proposed monitoring measures have been described in this report which include building condition
surveys. The results of the building condition surveys will be used to compare the actual damage
categories with those estimated in this report.

Proposed mitigation measures include repair of non-structural defects on completion of construction

and the immediate repair in the unlikely case of any structural damage.

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 10
10 References
1. Aye Z Z, Karki D and Schulz C (2006), Ground Movement Prediction and Building Damage
Risk-Assessment for the Deep Excavations and Tunnelling Works in Bangkok Subsoil,
International Symposium on Underground Excavation and Tunneling, Bangkok.
2. Bowles J E (1988), Foundation Analysis and Design, 4th Edition, McGRAW-Hill International
Book Company, Singapore, 1988.
3. Bowles J E (1997), Foundation Analysis and Design, 5th Edition, McGRAW-Hill International
Book Company, Singapore, 1997.
4. BP 2009 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 25 An Innovative Method for
Assessing Tunnelling- Induced Risks to Adjacent Structures by Nagen Loganathan.
5. Burland J B (1997), Assessment of risk of damage to buildings due to tunnelling and
excavation, Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Ishihara (ed), Balkema, Rotterdam, pp.
1189-1201.
6. Burland J B , Broms J B and de Mello VFB (1977), Behaviour of Foundations and Structures,
th
SOA Report Session 2, Proceedings of 9 International Conference, SMFE, Tokyo, 2:495-
546.
st
7. Burland J B (1995), Closing Ceremony, Proc. 1 IS-Hokkaido 94, 2, pp. 703-705.
8. CIRIA Project Report 30 Prediction and Effects of Ground Movement Caused by Tunnelling in
Soft Ground Beneath Urban Areas by LM Lake, WJ Rankin & J Hawley.
9. ORourke T D and Trautmann C H (1985), Lateral force displacement response of buried pipe.
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 111, No. 9, pp. 1077-1092.

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 11
11 Glossary of Terminology

The following terms have been used throughout the document and are listed below for reference.

Term Meaning
Works carried out in advance to facilitate ease of permanent works
Enabling works
construction
A trenchless technology of installing underground pipelines, generally
between 900mm and 3500mm in diameter) by means of jacking specially
Pipe jacking
designed pipes through the ground from a jacking pit or shaft. The
excavation is achieved by using a shield at the forward end of the pipeline.
The performance standards, both national and international that are
Project Criteria
recommended for use in the Project.
Structures susceptible to ground movements due to tunnel excavations and
Sensitive structures other construction activities. For the purpose of this assessment, this has
been defined as all buildings constructed with unreinforced masonry.

12 Glossary of Abbreviations

The following abbreviations have been used throughout the document and are listed below for
reference.

Acronym Meaning
AC Auckland Council
AEE Assessment of Effects on the Environment
AT Auckland Transport
CRL City Rail Link
DCR Design and Construction Report Albert Street Stormwater Main
Realignment
GRP Glass reinforced pipe
m Metres
mm Millimetres
OMS Orakei Main Sewer
PTA The Principal Technical Adviser to Auckland Transport for this Project is
Aurecon Group

Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 File CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0018 13 November 2014 Revision 2 Page 12
Appendix A
Construction Vibration
Contour Drawings -
Structural Assessment
 Legend
REE T

WELLESLE Y STREET EAST

DURHAM STREET EAST
Notes: HIGH ST

VICTORIA STREET EAST

1. Pipe jacked E
A tunnel construction radii calculated from the centreline of the tunnel +1.0m.
C
JEAN N PL
BATTEvalues
2. Radii supplied by Marshall Day Acoustics
3. Existing ground surface level taken from Aurecon's survey data up to property boundary. Shaft Excavation

VULCAN LANE
SHORTLAND STREET
Proximated beyond that using Auckland Council LiDAR data.
Construction Contour - Commercial
This map contains data derived in part or wholly from sources other than Aurecon and
therefore, no representations or warranties are made by Aurecon as to the accuracy Construction Contour QUEEN
- Residential
STREET
or completeness of this information.
Construction Contour - Historic or Sensitive Structures
! ! !

Pipe Jacked Centreline

Pipe Jacked Tunnel

DARBY STREET
Building Category
Commercial Building

WELLESLEY STREET WEST

VICTORIA STREET WEST
Historic / Sensitive Structure Building

DURHAM STREET WEST

WYNDHAM STREET
SWANSON STRE ET

MILLS LANE
ELLIOTT STREET

9
1

6
11
5
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!! !! ! !
!! !! ! !
!! !! ! !
!! !! !! !! ! !
!! !! !! !! !! ! !
!!

ALBERT STREET MAYORAL DRIVE

4
KINGSTON STREET

FEID
DE RASt. NoET
Street
L ST RE Building Category
1 12-26 Swanson Street Commercial FEDE RAL STREET

4 51-63 Victoria Street West Sensitive

5 98-102 Albert Street Sensitive
6 43 Victoria Street West Sensitive
9 15-31 Wellesley Street West Heritage
11 32-42 Wellesley Street West Sensitive

CLIENT REV DATE REVISION DETAILS APPROVED SCALE

M.FAULK1:1500
SIZE
A3
PRELIMINARY PROJECT SOUTHERN CORRIDOR
ALBERT STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STORMWATER MAIN REALIGNMENT
1 17.10.14 ISSUED FOR CONSENT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN
C.IRVINE
APPROVED CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION CONTOURS
DATE TITLE STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT -
DESIGNED 06.11.14
ALL VIBRATION SOURCES AT GROUND LEVEL
J.WHITLOCK D.ANDERSON
PROJECT ZONE DISCIPLINE ELEMENT TYPE SHEET REVISION
A 27/06/13 FIRST M.R CHECKED
D.ANDERSON _ _ _ _ _ _
C.STEVENSON
DOCUMENT
CRL PAT RME 000 DOC 0006 1.0
 Legend
REE T

WELLESLE Y STREET EAST

DURHAM STREET EAST
Notes: HIGH ST

VICTORIA STREET EAST

1. Pipe jacked E
A tunnel construction radii calculated from the centreline of the tunnel +1.0m.
C
JEAN N PL
BATTEvalues
2. Radii supplied by Marshall Day Acoustics
3. Existing ground surface level taken from Aurecon's survey data up to property boundary. Shaft Excavation

VULCAN LANE
SHORTLAND STREET
Proximated beyond that using Auckland Council LiDAR data.
Construction Contour - Commercial
This map contains data derived in part or wholly from sources other than Aurecon and
therefore, no representations or warranties are made by Aurecon as to the accuracy Construction Contour QUEEN
- Residential
STREET
or completeness of this information.
Construction Contour - Historic or Sensitive Structures
! ! !

Pipe Jacked Centreline

Pipe Jacked Tunnel

DARBY STREET
Building Category
Commercial Building

WELLESLEY STREET WEST

VICTORIA STREET WEST
Residential Building

DURHAM STREET WEST

WYNDHAM STREET
SWANSON STRE ET

MILLS LANE
ELLIOTT STREET

3 7

2 8 10
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!! !! ! !
!! !! ! !
!! !! ! !
!! !! !! !! ! !
!! !! !! !! !! ! !
!!

ALBERT STREET MAYORAL DRIVE

KINGSTON STREET

REET
FEDE RAL ST
ID St. No Street Building Category FEDE RAL STREET
2 70-74 Albert Street Residential
3 76-84 Albert Street Residential
7 120 Albert Street Commercial
8 128 Albert Street Residential
10 37 Wellesley Street West Residential

CLIENT REV DATE REVISION DETAILS APPROVED SCALE

M.FAULK1:1500
SIZE
A3
PRELIMINARY PROJECT SOUTHERN CORRIDOR
ALBERT STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STORMWATER MAIN REALIGNMENT
1 17.10.14 ISSUED FOR CONSENT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN
C.IRVINE
APPROVED CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION CONTOURS
DATE TITLE STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT -
DESIGNED 06.11.14
ALL VIBRATION SOURCES AT 10M BELOW GROUND LEVEL
J.WHITLOCK D.ANDERSON
PROJECT ZONE DISCIPLINE ELEMENT TYPE SHEET REVISION
A 27/06/13 FIRST M.R CHECKED
D.ANDERSON _ _ _ _ _ _
C.STEVENSON
DOCUMENT
CRL PAT RME 000 DOC 0005 1.0