Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Professor P.
English 102
30 January 2016
The topic I have chosen is social media in our lives and how it can shape the way we
think. The reason I have chosen this topic is because as I get older I notice how different I think
about people over social media even though I may have know that person for quite sometime, I
realize I start to judge them for the things they post or things they like. People that I once were
great friends with now seem bigoted, overly sensitive, slutty, irresponsible, or even just plain
stupid. I also noticed in light of the recent election how much information is shared with no
credible source, both ends of the spectrum spew out tons of barely credible but extremely
persuasive information and large numbers of people grab onto that information and use it to
shape their thoughts. Its not only in political posts but even posts where they is no point in them
having the wrong information. I also believe that with social media information spreads so
quickly and creates instances where something like the riot in Charlotte, NC was able to happen.
I believe some of the problems that exist with social media is the ability for non-credible
information to spread so quickly and how social media can change one's perception of one
Social Media as a Tool for Protest is an Article by Marko Papic and Sean Noonan and
they claim that social media is a useful tool for a protest. They draw this argument from looking
at how the protests in Egypt developed and continued. They claim that with the use of social
media it lowers the cost of a protest such as participation, organization, recruitment, and training.
The paper talks about how social media offers advantages in releasing messages quickly and
broadly but the messages are vulnerable to interference, in this case government spreading false
information to disrupt the protesters on social media. They claim that the key for a protest is to
inspire and motivate individuals to confront the issue, with the use of social media it is much
easier to do so, someone instead of attending meetings and rallies can just join a Facebook group
or follow the protest on other social media platforms. In addition the protest movements can
reach hundreds of thousands of adherents with a single Facebook post or Twitter feed. The
major values and interest that is at stake is the data pertaining to the other types of protests. In the
paper they talk about how the social media can only really be effective when it is the right time
to use it, they give an example of a neo-nazi posting on social media doesnt make that great of
an impact when compared to someone posting about politics in a time of political unrest. The
authors of this article are credible because they had their article published and verified on Google
Scholar. Also Papic and Noonan have both been on the news and have spoken about their topic. I
believe the paper is slightly biased towards social media being a great tool for protests, not once
do they talk about how the protests could be a bad thing or mention how misinformation from
the protestors end can cause harm. Although they talk about some of the weakness in Social
Media as a tool they only talk about how it is weak due to no quality of leadership.
about the emotional connect that one receives through social media. She claims that relationships
although social media are valuable they do not have the ability of providing one with the
opportunities of deep emotional closeness. Her claim that relationships through social media is
valuable is backed up by studies that link social support to positive mental health and the
negative emotional impact of loneliness. Also research on those with fewer social relationships
die sooner on average compared to those with more social relationships. Her claims of social
media lacking the deep connection is back by studies that show people try to make themselves
look good through social media. Displays of emotional weakness, insecurity, or conflicts
generally tend to be concealed or minimized on social networking sites. She then says that
because of that it is difficult to reveal the qualities that define deep, intimate relationships. The
major values and interest that is at stake are the authors ideas on what makes a intimate
relationship, although it is mostly given that one would develop a deeper relationship with
someone in person, there is the chance that one builds a deep relationship through social media. I
believe the article is slightly biased towards her medical knowledge, as said above everyone is
different and it is completely possible for one to build a deeper relationship through social media
rather than in person. I believe she is credible because she cites her sources and studies and is a
Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism by Pablo Gerbaudo
makes claims of the culture of protest movements are now in social media. He defends this claim
by looking at examples of protest fueled by social media the examples are the Arab Spring,
"indignados" protests in Spain, and the Occupy movement. Gerbaudo says that social media is
used as part of a project of re-appropriation of public space, basically saying that social media
allows for people to create a place to protest in short time. The major values and interest that is at
stake are as says the author, the risks of political evanescence which new media brings to the
contemporary protest experience. The bias in this article is that the author is saying the only
benefit from social media is the ability to meet at certain places in a quick amount of time.
Questions:
http://dalpemilette.com/files/pdf/infosabius/2011_03/InfoSabius_2011_03_07_MediasSociaux.p
df
https://psychcentral.com/lib/author/shelley-galasso-bonanno/
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2462754