Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
About 100,000 foreigners with long-term visas are required by law to have Czech private health
insurance. The group includes foreign students, self-employed people, and the spouses of foreigners
working here. But according to the Campaign for Health Insurance for Migrants all foreigners
should participate in the public health care system.
The requirement to take out private insurance for these people was part of legislation brought in
2010. The product needed for a visa was comprehensive health insurance (komplexn zdravotn
pojitn) which should cover visits to the doctor and hospital care as well as emergencies.
A justification given for new requirement was to ensure that doctors and health professionals would
be paid. The implication being that foreign insurance companies didnt pay or the money was too
difficult to obtain.
Personal Care?
For some foreigners who are clients of these private companies, this rationale must ring with the
bitterest irony. The Campaign for Health Insurance for Migrants has been collecting testimonies
from people from Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Australia, and Mongolia. The individuals concerned had
complex health insurance from a range of companies. The accounts are cause for concern.
One woman from Uzbekistan followed the regulations and took out insurance with PVZP the
private arm of VZP which provides insurance to foreigners. According to her story, many doctors
refused to accept this insurance. A Ukrainian woman attempted to visit doctors on the list provided
by her insurer UNIQA. None of the listed doctors would treat her without cash up front, which she
eventually had to pay. A fellow countryman of hers was told at Motol that he was another
Ukrainian with the wrong insurance.
The lack of proper coverage has touched at least one Czech. Jan* has a wife from South America.
Though theyre married, she still requires private health insurance because she hasnt been granted
residency. Jan has spoken up because of the poor nature of the conditions provided by private
insurance, the poor service for foreigners, and the discriminatory nature of the policy.
Unhealthy System
Maybe irony is the wrong word. Irony (at least in the historical sense) implies an unintended or
opposite outcome. Maybe the companies never planned to ensure that medical treatment was paid,
at least not by them, or so alleges Linda Jank of SEHNUT, one of the groups who are a part this
campaign.
The reality is that the health insurance companies enter into the contract many conditions so that
basically when the migrant needs the health care to be paid, its not paid, she said.
The campaign explains that one reason for the inadequate coverage is the exceedingly high running
costs of the private insurance companies. An analysis compiled for the Campaign for Health
Insurance for Migrants shows running costs for the five Czech insurance companies averaging 63%
with 22% going towards health care. In one instance, an insurer only paid 11% of its earnings
toward insurance.
Spokespeople from some of the companies responded to these figures. Maxima didnt deny the
figure but their spokesperson Olga Herko said in an email, Total operating expenses include a wide
variety of items, one of which is commission for the acquisition of contracts.
Slavia rejected the figure included in the analysis. Spokesperson Ale Povr said, Commercial
health insurance for foreigners with lower cover but higher rates of claims cant have a claim
amount of 11%. However, they would not provide the figure of how much their claims came to.
PVZPs spokesperson Robert Kare also rejected the figure included in the analysis. He went on to
add that PVZPs mother company VZP doesnt agree with the inclusion of migrants here on long-
term visas to be included in the insurance system.
Kare added, The problem of the whole of this campaign is the sheer ignorance about these
systems and subsequent erroneous presentation of knowledge.
Age is no guarantee of care. Another case provided by the campaign concerns a young girl who had
to have surgery. The surgery was covered by the insurer until a second doctor changed the
diagnosis. The girls family had to fight to have the original diagnose recognized in order for the
surgery to be covered.
Even when the company covers a childs treatment, the fact that foreign children dont participate in
the public medical system is a particularly thorny one for the Czech state. The Czech Republic is a
signatory to the Convention on the Rights of the Child
[http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm]. Article 24 of that document states a signatorys
obligation is regarding the provision of health services to children.
Elena Tulupov, a lecturer in public health at Charles University, is another member of this
campaign. She said, In the questions regarding health it is absolutely inappropriate that in a
European state children cant get proper health care.
The Ministry of Health interprets the Czech Republics obligation differently. The said obligation
does not mean that it has to be borne by public health insurance, their spokesperson Libue Bosk
wrote via email.
The reasoning is that the health system, in the Ministrys view, is inherently designed for those who
fund it.
The problems with the private insurance system for foreigners affect practitioners as well. Tim
Young is from Young and Co. a private medical practice in Dejvice. They have a number of patients
from the expat community, and while this should be good for business, they have to turn people
away.
Our problem is that we have about a third of our patients who are non-Czech but who consume
maybe half of our time whilst bringing no more revenue than Czech patients (being covered under
public health insurance), he said.
An additional problem is the unreliability of the insurance.
There are also frequent problems with VZP retroactively cancelling insurance for foreigners after
our services have been provided, in which case we do not get paid, Young added.
Ministerial Response
According to the campaign, the Ministry of Healths argument against including foreigners who
have long-term visa is that they fear health tourism.
Ministry spokesperson Bosk, wrote, This possibility [medical tourism] must be envisaged and, of
course, must be taken into account because it cannot be ruled out.
Bosk points to the general concern of social tourism in the EU as justification for concern.
However, she claims that this concern is not the driving force in deciding on the possibility of
extending the personal scope of the law.
The Campaign for Health Insurance for Migrants counter this argument by pointing out that most
foreigners who come are between 18 and 65, the very age group which draws on health care the
least.
Are the cases above isolated? One way to find out is from your responses. Are you getting the
health care youve paid for? Should migrants participate in the state health care system?