Trebuchet Physics How A Trebuchet Works

http://www.real-world-physics-problems.com/trebuchet-
physics.html

A trebuchet is a battle machine used in the middle ages to throw

heavy payloads at enemies. The payload could be thrown a far
distance and do considerable damage, either by smashing down
walls or striking the enemy while inside their stronghold.

The trebuchet was preferred over a catapult due to its greater

range capability and greater accuracy.

A trebuchet works by using the energy of a falling (and hinged)

counterweight to launch a projectile (the payload), using
mechanical advantage to achieve a high launch speed. For
maximum launch speed the counterweight must be much heavier
than the payload, since this means that it will "fall" quickly.

The motion of a trebuchet during launch can become fairly

complicated, and cannot be fully understood using intuition alone.
Therefore, one must analyze trebuchet physics in full in order to
make accurate predictions.

In some designs a guide chute is used to guide the sling along

and support the payload until the speed is great enough to hold it
in the pouch alone. This will be discussed in more detail in the
analysis section.

The beginning of the launch is illustrated in the figure below.

As you can see, the counterweight pivots around a much shorter
distance than the payload end. The advantage of this is that the
payload end of the beam reaches a much higher linear velocity
than the counterweight end of the beam. This is the principal of
mechanical advantage, and is what allows the payload to reach a
high launch velocity. However, because the counterweight pivots
around a much shorter distance, its weight must be much greater
than the weight of the payload, to get a high launch velocity.
However, increasing the mass of the counterweight beyond a
certain point will not help, since the limiting speed of the falling
counterweight is free-fall speed.
The sling releases when a certain angle is reached. At this point
the ring (which is connected to the sling and loops around the
finger for support) slips off and the payload is launched. The
release angle can be adjusted by changing the finger angle .
For a greater the release angle increases. For a smaller the
release angle decreases.

The figure below illustrates the trebuchet at the release point.

As the beam rotates clockwise (due to the falling counterweight),

the payload experiences centripetal acceleration which causes it
to move outwards (since it is unrestrained). This results in a large
increase in linear velocity of the payload which far exceeds that of
the end of the beam to which the sling is attached. This is the
heart of trebuchet physics and is the reason a trebuchet has such
great launching power.
However, it is worth noting that the physics of the trebuchet is not
unique to the trebuchet. For example, in a golf swing the same
basic physics applies. In fact, you can think of a trebuchet as an
upside down golf swing. Thus, the physics of a trebuchet is very
similar to the physics of a golf swing.

The optimal trebuchet design is one that launches the payload

the farthest horizontal distance. This makes sense intuitively
since range is a key factor when staging an attack on an enemy.
The challenge then, is to find the optimal design to maximize the
range. This is not a trivial task given that there are many
variables one can adjust. Fortunately, such an optimization is
greatly simplified given that trebuchet physics can be modeled
with computers, saving a lot of time.

According to Donald B. Siano, in his analysis of trebuchet physics

(Trebuchet Mechanics, March 28, 2001), the optimal release
position and design, based on his definition of "range efficiency"
is such that:

The initial release position is such that the beam on the

counterweight side makes an angle of 45 with the vertical.

The length of the long arm of the beam (on the payload side) is
3.75 times the length of the short arm of the beam (on the
counterweight side).

The length of the sling is equal to the length of the long arm of
the beam (on the payload side).

Furthermore, he recommends using a counterweight that has a

mass 100 times greater than the mass of the payload. However, it
is certainly possible to achieve a good design with a much lighter
counterweight than this.

If you're interested in having a small working trebuchet you can

get one through Amazon. Click on the image link below to find out
more.
To aid designers and enthusiasts, I created a trebuchet simulator,
programmed in Microsoft Excel. It's very useful for helping you
come up with the winning design in a trebuchet competition! Click
here to learn more about it.

Sign up below for my free newsletter and you will receive

insightful physics related bonus material. Many topics will be
discussed, including more discussion on the physics of trebuchets.
It's sent about once a month. Easily unsubscribe at any time.

E-mail Address

First Name

Then
Subscribe

Don't worry your e-mail address is totally secure.

I promise to use it only to send you Real World Physics Problems
Newsletter.

Trebuchet Physics Analysis

The development of the equations to fully analyze trebuchet

physics is quite an onerous task, both to derive and fully present
on a website. Therefore, the full mathematical development will
not be presented here. Instead, the basic equations will be
introduced in order to give the reader a basic understanding of
the core physics and mathematics required to fully describe the
physics of a trebuchet.

This will be modeled as a two-dimensional problem.

The following assumptions are made in this analysis:

The trebuchet is rigid. There is no flexing of the various

members.

There is no friction on the guide chute (to be discussed), or at

the joints (pivots).
 The pouch and sling have negligible mass.

There is no air resistance as the payload flies through the air.

The trebuchet remains stationary on the ground during launch.

Case 1 Payload In Contact With Guide Chute

As mentioned before, some trebuchet designs use a guide chute

to keep the payload in place during the initial part of the launch.
This part of the launch is "constrained" since the payload can only
move along the surface of the guide chute. This is illustrated with
the following schematic. To simplify the analysis here, the sling is
replaced with a single cable in tension attached to the payload
and the end of the beam. The hinged counterweight is replaced
with a mass suspended by a single cable attached to the other
end of the beam. The guide chute is assumed to be frictionless.

The variables are defined as follows:

L1 is the distance between the end of the beam (on the
counterweight end, point A) and the fixed pivot about which the
beam rotates (point P)

L2 is the distance between the end of the beam (on the payload
end) and the fixed pivot about which the beam rotates (point P)

L3 is the length of the cable holding the payload

L4 is the length of the cable holding the counterweight

s is the distance between the end of the beam (on the payload
end) and the center of mass of the beam (point G)

is the angle between the vertical and the beam, on the

counterweight side, as shown. This angle is defined as negative

is the angle between the beam and the cable holding the
payload. This angle is defined as positive

is the angle between the beam and the cable holding the
counterweight. This angle is defined as positive

g is the acceleration due to gravity, acting downwards. This value

is equal to 9.8 m/s2 on earth

First, let's analyze the counterweight using a free-body diagram,

as shown below.
where T2 is the tension in the cable holding the counterweight.

Let the origin of the (fixed) coordinate system xy lie at point P

(which is a fixed point).

The coordinates of the counterweight M are given as:

The acceleration of the counterweight M is:

By Newton's Second Law,

where M is the mass of the counterweight.

Therefore,

Next, let's analyze the beam using a free-body diagram, as shown

below.
where T is the tension in the cable holding the payload, and mb is
the mass of the beam. The weight of the beam mbg acts through
the center of mass of the beam G.

Summing the moments about the pivot P we have:

where Ip is the moment of inertia of the beam about an axis

passing through point P and pointing out of the page. The term
d2/dt2 is the angular acceleration of the beam.

By the parallel axis theorem,

where IG is the moment of inertia of the beam about an axis
passing through the center of mass G and pointing out of the
page. In calculating the moment of inertia the beam is treated as
a slender rod.

Lastly, analyze the payload using a free-body diagram, as shown

below.

where m is the mass of the payload, and N is the normal force

exerted by the guide chute on the payload.

Once again, let the origin of the coordinate system xy lie at point
P (which is a fixed point).

Next, we need to define the position of the payload with respect

to point P. To do this we set up a schematic as shown below.
Where:

d1 is the vertical distance, as shown

d2 is the horizontal distance, as shown

am is the acceleration of the payload, as shown

Since the payload m is moving horizontally along the guide chute,

only its x-coordinate (relative to point P) is changing. The x-
coordinate (xm) is given by:

where

By geometry,
and

where 1 is the angle the beam makes with the vertical when the
payload end of the beam touches the guide chute (and the cable
holding the payload is horizontal).

Thus, the acceleration of the payload is:

(There is no vertical component of acceleration, so amy = 0).

By Newton's Second Law,

where (by geometry),

The payload loses contact with the guide chute (lifts off) when the
normal force N is zero. This means that the vertical component of
tension T (in the y-direction) exceeds the weight of the payload
(mg).

Case 2 Payload Lifts Off From Guide Chute

In this case, the payload "lifts off" from the guide chute and
experiences "unconstrained" motion, since it's no longer in
contact with the guide chute. The analysis in this case begins with
the following schematic.

The equations for the counterweight and beam are exactly the
same as for the previous case (with the guide chute).

However, since the payload is unconstrained in this case (no

contact with guide chute), its equations will be different from the
previous case.

The free-body diagram for the payload m is shown below.

Just like before, let the origin of the coordinate system xy lie at
point P (which is a fixed point).

The coordinates of the payload m are given as:

The acceleration of the payload m is:

By Newton's Second Law,

This completes the trebuchet physics analysis.

Return from Trebuchet Physics to The Physics Of Battle

page