Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Defining abnormality: A persons thinking/behaviour is classified as abnormal if

theyre unable to cope with the demands of every life or


Statistical infrequency experience personal distress e.g. getting out of bed each
A persons thinking/behaviour is classified as day
abnormal if rare or statistically unusual Rosenhan & Seligman suggested seven criteria for FFA:
Falls outside the range thats typical for most people o Personal distress (anxiety/depression)
The average is normal o Unprectability (loss of control/unexpected
e.g. one who has an IQ below or above the average level of behaviours)
IQ in society is abnormal o Irrationality / incomprehensibility
((unreasonable/illogical/unjustifiable) / (not able
provide an objective way, based on data, to define to be understood))
abnormality if an agreed cut-off point can be identified. o Maladaptiveness (danger to self/not adjusting
definition (unlike DSN) does not make judgements about appropriately to environment)
the acceptability of behaviour. The behaviour is rare o Suffering
rather than wrong. o Causes observer discomfort
difficult to know where the draw the line between o Violates moral/social standards
behaviour that is frequent enough to be normal and rare
enough to be abnormal e.g. depression found in 19% provides a practical checklist of seven criteria individuals
people aged 16+ with 20% women reporting symptoms can use to check their level of abnormality.
and 18% in men. matches the sufferers' perceptions. most people seeking
fails to distinguish between desirable and undesirable help believe they are suffering from psychological
behavior e.g. high iq is desired but in this definition, it problems that interfere with the ability to function
could be seen as abnormal properly
cultural and historical relativism whats acceptable in FFA is context dependent E.G. not eating can be seen
one culture and time period may not be in another as failing to function adequately but prisoners protesting
by hunger strikes isnt; people engage in maladaptive
Deviation from social norms behavior e.g. smoking, drinking alcohol, but arent
classed as abnormal
A persons thinking/behaviour is classified as abnormal if Cultural relativism; what may be seen as functioning
it violates the unwritten rules about what is expected or adequately in one culture may not be adequate in
acceptable another, resulting in different diagnoses e.g. children
Their behaviour may : be incomprehensible to others ; carry out work in Gambia that children in western
make others feel threatened / uncomfortable. cultures cannot
necessary to consider: (i) The degree to which a norm is
violated, the importance of that norm and the value Deviation from Ideal mental health
attached by the social group to different sorts of
violation. (ii) E.g. is the violation rude, eccentric, Rather than defining whats abnormal, we define what is
abnormal or criminal? normal/ideal and anything that deviates from it is
gives a social dimension to the idea of abnormality, abnormal
which offers an alternative to the 'sick in the head' Jahoda proposed 6 characteristics, absence from these
individual. is considered as abnormal.
cultural and historical relativism whats acceptable in
one culture and time period may not be in another e.g. o Positive view of self
common in Southern Europe to stand much closer to
strangers than in the UK; homosexuality was regarded o Capacity for growth and development
as mental illness until 1972, not anymore
cross cultural misunderstanding may contribute to higher o Autonomy and independence
rates in some disorders than it actually is.. high
diagnosis rate of schizophrenia amongst non white o Accurate perception of reality
british people
based on context the behaviour occurs e.g. same
o Positive friendships and relationships
behaviour might be normal and abnormal e.g.
undressing in a bathroom or classroom subjective
o Environmental mastery meeting the
judgment is necessary human rights abuse when
demands of day to day situations
USSR political dissidents were sent to psychiatric
hospitals for disobeying the political regime
cultural and historical relativism whats acceptable in
one culture and time period may not be in another e.g.
Failure to Function Adequately
common in Southern Europe to stand much closer to
strangers than in the UK; homosexuality was regarded
as mental illness until 1972, not anymore
cross cultural misunderstanding may contribute to higher
rates in some disorders than it actually is.. high
diagnosis rate of schizophrenia amongst non white
british people
Difficulty of meeting all criteria - few people would be
able to do so. This definition suggests we are all
abnormal most of the time so this becomes meaningless
(over inclusive)
Phobias

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen