The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974

The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, amended in 1986 and 1996, is the legal basis for
regulating public drinking water in the United States. Its passage was spurred largely by
mounting public awareness about contaminants in the environment, and concern for the safety
of drinking water. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has primary enforcement
responsibility.

Evolution of the Law

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of 1974 was the first federal law mandating drinking-water
standards for all public water systems, from big cities to roadside campgrounds. It was enacted
as a result of a federal survey of large and small public drinking-water systems that revealed
poor water quality was endangering public health. The U.S. Public Health Service had set some
drinking water quality standards in 1914, but these were merely voluntary for public systems.

Under the 1974 SDWA, public water systems were required to follow water quality standards for
particular contaminants. Water systems must be tested for these contaminants and, if
necessary, the water is treated to reduce contaminants to the maximum contaminant levels
(MCLs) set for each contaminant.

The first standards for required monitoring by public water systems were set for some inorganic
contaminants (e.g., metals, nitrates), microbial contaminants (e.g., bacteria), turbidity, and
radionuclides (trace amounts of radioactivity emitters such as radium, uranium, and radon).
Also, special protection was made available to communities with an aquifer that was the sole
source of drinking water.

The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act helps ensure a safe drinking-water supply from public water
systems, whether small or large.

Private wells are not regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The EPA encourages, but
cannot force, private well owners to have their water tested at least annually for health-
threatening contaminants.

Amendments.

Major amendments to the SDWA in 1986 set a goal of eighty-three contaminant standards to be
established by 1989 and twenty-five more contaminants for every 3 years thereafter. The
additional contaminants identified in the 1986 Amendments included organic contaminants
(e.g., pesticides and volatile organic compounds) and chlorine disinfection byproducts. Lead
pipes and lead solder in new drinking-water systems were banned. Rules were to be written
regarding monitoring injection wells injecting wastes below drinking-water sources. States were
required by the amendments to develop a wellhead protection program for public wells. And all
surface water systems (i.e., systems using lakes or streams) had to use disinfection techniques
and filter their water sources to remove microbes, including bacteria, viruses, and protozoans
that commonly occur in surface water. These microbes do not routinely occur in groundwater
(unless it has been contaminated); therefore, groundwater-based water systems were not
required to disinfect or filter their water unless a need exists.
The 1996 amendments created a state revolving loan program to provide loan money to
communities needing system upgrades or source-water protection. The 1986 Amendment
requiring EPA to develop standards for twenty-five new contaminants every 3 years was
rescinded. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was to consider risk and cost–benefits of
implementing any particular standard. Community water systems were required to publish
annual reports to inform citizens about contaminant levels in their water and their community
water system's performance in meeting drinking-water standards.

A Source-Water Assessment Program was added. All states were to survey land uses around
every source water area (surface or groundwater), delineate the source-area boundaries,
identify potential contaminant sources within them, and estimate the susceptibility of the
drinking-water source to those potential contaminant sources.

Drinking-Water Standards

Of the nation's 170,000 public drinking-water systems, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency estimates that more than half (about 53 percent) use groundwater as their source; the
remainder (47 percent) use surface water. Regardless of source, water for public supply must
meet federal and state standards designed to protect public health. There are two types of
drinking-water standards: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR) and National
Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR).

The NPDWR lists both a Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) and a Maximum
Contaminant Level (MCL) for each listed contaminant. The MCLG reflects the contaminant level
below which there is no known or expected human health risk. It is not an enforceable standard.
The MCL is set as close as possible to the MCLG based on best available treatment technology
and cost. It is the maximum amount of a contaminant that may be delivered to users of a public
water system and is a legally enforceable standard.

The NSDWR sets non-mandatory, non-enforceable standards for fifteen contaminants that may
cause water to have an undesirable color or odor, but do not have potentially adverse health
consequences. Examples include iron, total dissolved solids, and pH.

Contaminant Categories.

As of 2003, ninety-five water contaminants were regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Approximately seven hundred substances have been cataloged as potential
contaminants. Contaminants include harmless constituents as well as harmful ones.

Low levels of trace metals, nutrients, minerals, and salts are found naturally in water. At low
concentrations, these contaminants are harmless; some may even be desirable—for example,
many people prefer the taste of slightly mineralized water. Other contaminants are
manufactured, and are undesirable at any concentration. Similarly, any level of bacteria in
drinking water is considered to be a violation of the MCL.

The EPA's contaminant categories as of 2002 included: microorganisms (Cryptosporidium,

Giardia lamblia, Legionella, total coliforms, fecal coliforms and E. coli), disinfectant and
disinfection byproducts, inorganic chemicals, organic chemicals, and radionuclides. MCLs for
the ninety contaminants regulated as of 2002, their probable source, and related health effects
can be found online at <http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mcl.html>.

Keeping Water Safe

To ensure compliance with safe drinking water standards, water systems are required to
frequently sample and test the water being delivered. If contaminant levels exceed MCLs, the
water system must discontinue the use of that source until the level is reduced to below the
MCL by treatment, blending, or finding an alternative source. Customers must be advised
immediately of actions necessary to prevent disease outbreaks, such as boiling water before
drinking in the case of microorganisms, or by switching to bottled water.

Management trends and challenges to protect drinking water are numerous. Infrastructure
maintenance and replacement is needed to fix leaks, prevent breaks, and ensure proper water
treatment. New technology allows scientists to measure the presence of previously unstudied or
undetected contaminants (e.g., pharmaceuticals and personal care products, or PPCPs), which
then must be investigated to determine if they, too, pose a human health risk in drinking water.

Population growth increases demand and changing land-use practices threatens supply quality,
particularly groundwater. An aging population means more elderly citizens, who are more at risk
from drinking-water contaminants. The public needs to learn not only to conserve water, but also
to realize what daily practices add to nonpoint-source pollution of groundwater and surface
water so they can avoid or minimize those practices. Rural areas of the United States have a
particular challenge, since small systems often cannot afford these costly mandates.

The Safe Drinking Water Act is important to water management in that it illuminates the
interconnection of water resources and land resources, and how land use affects water quality.
In addition, source-water quality affects drinking-water treatment costs, so monitoring and
enforcement of the SDWA and the Clean Water Act go hand in hand.

SEE ALSO CHEMICALS FROM PHARMACEUTICALS AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS;

CLEAN WATER ACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U.S.; DRINKING WATER
AND SOCIETY; DRINKING-WATER TREATMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE, WATER-SUPPLY;
LAND USE AND WATER QUALITY; LEGISLATION, FEDERAL WATER; POLLUTION
SOURCES: POINT AND NONPOINT; POPULATION AND WATER RESOURCES; SECURITY
AND WATER; SUPPLIES, PROTECTING PUBLIC DRINKING-WATER; SUPPLIES, PUBLIC
AND DOMESTIC WATER; UTILITY MANAGEMENT.

Laurel E. Phoenix

and Edward F. Vitzthum

Bibliography

Kubasek, Nancy K., and Gary S. Silverman. Environmental Law, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 25 Years of the Safe Drinking Water Act: History and
Trends. EPA-816-R-99-007, December. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1999. Available online at <http://www.epa.gov/safewater/sdwa/trends.html>.

Internet Resources

Ground Water and Drinking Water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

<http://www.epa.gov/safewater>.

National Drinking Water Clearinghouse. <http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/ndwc/>.

Water On Tap: A Consumer's Guide to the Nation's Drinking Water. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. <http://www.epa.gov/safewater/wot/wot.html>.

BIOTERRORISM ACT

Although the U.S. drinking-water industry and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
have been working on projects to enhance security of drinking-water supplies since the 1990s,
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington, D.C. catapulted water
security to the forefront. In 2002, the U.S. Congress enacted the Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act. With respect to water supplies, this legislation
amended the Safe Drinking Water Act and specified actions that community water systems and
the EPA must take to improve the security of the nation's drinking-water infrastructure.

In short, every community water system serving at least 3,300 persons must prepare or revise
an emergency response plan, and conduct an assessment of their vulnerability to terrorist attack
or other intentional act intended to substantially disrupt a safe and reliable drinking-water
supply. Among other duties, EPA must conduct studies regarding the intentional introduction of
harmful contaminants; the methods by which drinking-water infrastructures could be disrupted;
and the methods by which alternative supplies of drinking water could be provided in the event
of destruction or impairment of public water systems.

For further information about the Safe Drinking Water Act and water infrastructure security, see
<http://www.epa.gov/safewater/security/index.html>. Selected links to industry and government
websites are available through this EPA webpage.