Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant Corrupt U.S. Circuit Judge John
Edwin Steele in his private individual capacity and official capacity. Defendant Steele’s
criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any immunity and official capacity.
BRIBERY
2. In exchange for bribes, Defendant John E. Steele deliberately deprived the Plaintiff
corruption victims of their express fundamental rights under the Florida and Federal
Government, redress Government grievances, and defend against public corruption and
Government crimes.
b. No “Rule 38 motion” by Def. Forger Wilkinson could be found in the official records of
d. No mandated “July 2009 judgment” in the amount of “$5,048.60” had ever existed and/or
4. For bribes, Defendant Crooked Judge conspired with other Defendants and Officials to
conceal Def. Crooked Appraiser Wilkinson’s prima facie record forgeries of “land parcels”
Defendant Wilkinson and other Government Officials and Defendants. See Doc. ## 87, 338,
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT
5. Corrupt Steele knew and fraudulently concealed that on the record Defendant Forger
Wilkinson had forged “land parcels”, which Def. Steele could not locate on the 1912 “Cayo
Costa” Subdivision Plat recorded in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25.
6. Def. Corrupt Steele conspired with other Officials to fabricate a “Rule 38 Motion”, which
Defendant “land parcel” Forger K. M. Wilkinson had never signed and/or filed.
7. Defendant Crooked Steele knew and fraudulently concealed that Def. S. F. Birch had
falsified “motions” and “orders”; e.g., on 03/05/09, Def. Birch had falsified a motion for
sanctions for Busse’s pursuit of a frivolous appeal, Doc. # 386-4, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
8. Corrupt Steele knew and concealed that the fraudulently pretended “grant” of a non-
existent “motion” was a fraud and extortion scheme on the public record.
9. Steele falsified the record and fraudulently pretended a “judgment” even though no
“judgment” in the amount of “$5,048.60” had ever existed on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-
2
FABRICATIONS OF “FRIVOLITY” FOR ILLEGAL PURPOSES
10. Defendant Steele knew and fraudulently concealed that Def. “land parcel” Forger
Wilkinson had never filed any motion for sanctions for a frivolous appeal, Fed.R.Civ.P. 38.
Defendant Corrupt Steele concealed that any time to file the non-existent “Rule 38 motion”
11. Def. Steele fabricated “frivolity” for criminal and unlawful purposes of “punishing” the
Plaintiffs and coercing them to refrain from prosecuting Government Officials and