Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
B. Ex post Facto Laws (22, Art. III) EXC to EXC: error involves violation of
1. Ex Post Facto right to speedy trial
Kinds CASE: Conde v. Rivera, 45 Phil 650
Characteristics
3. Procedure
CASES: 4. Grounds for Suspension (Read Sec. 18, Art. VII)
1. Republic v. Fernandez, 99 Phil 934
2. Bayot v. Sandiganbayan, 128 SCRA 383 CASES:
3. Nunez v. Sandiganbayan, 111 SCRA 433 1. Lansang v. Garcia, 42 SCRA 448
4. Montenegro v. Castaneda, 91 Phil 882 2. Garcia-Padilla v. Enrile, 121 SCRA 472
5. US v. Gomez Coronel, 12 Phil 279 (Read, 3. Ilagan v. Enrile, 139 SCRA 349 (read also the
however, Pp v. Vilo, 32 Phil 529, including dissents of Teehankee & Concepcion, JJ.)
the dissent)
6. Pp v. Ferrer, 48 SCRA 382 F. Speedy Disposition of Cases (16, Art.
7. Rodriguez v. Sandiganbayan, 120 SCRA 659 III)
8. Katigbak v. Solicitor General, 180 SCRA 540
1. Related provisions
Sec 14 (1), Art. III
2. Bill of Attainder
Characteristics Sec 5 (3) and (5), Art. VIII; Sec 15, Art. VIII
Sec. 7, Art. IX-A
CASES:
1. Pp v. Ferrer, supra
2. US v. Lovett, 323 US 323