Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
BY
ADEEL ATA
1250800011
AVANEESH KUMAR
1250800035
DEEPAK SINGH YADAV 1250800039
DIVYANSHU AWASTHI
1250800044
PRATEEK SRIVASTAVA
1250800078
(1)
A.P.J ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY,
LUCKNOW
2016-2017
CERTIFICATE
Certified that the project entitled Earthquake Resistant Building submitted by ADEEL ATA
(1250800078)
In the partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of bachelor of
Technology (Civil Engineering) of A.KT.U, is a record of students own work carried under our
supervision and guidance. The project report embodies results of original work and studies
carried out by students and the contents do not form the basis for the award of any other degree
(2)
MR. RAHUL SINGH MR. RAJ KUMAR GUPTA
BBDEC
DECLARATION
We hereby declare that the project entitle Earthquake Resistant Building submitted by us in
the partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Technology
(Civil Engineering) of A.K.T.U is record of our own work carried under the supervision and
To the best of my knowledge this project has not been submitted to A.K.T.U or any other
ADEEL ATA
AVANEESH KUMAR
DEEPAK SINGH YADAV
DIVYANSHU AWASTHI
PRATEEK SRIVASTAVA
(3)
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
BBDEC
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are extremely grateful and remain indebted to our guide Mr.RAHUL SINGH and Mr. R.K
GUPTA (H.O.D), Civil Department for being a source of inspiration and for their constant
support in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of project. We are thankful to them
for their constant constructive suggestions, which benefited use lot in developing this project.
They had been a constant source of inspiration and motivation for hard work, through this
column; it would be my utmost pleasure to express our warm thanks to them for their
encouragement, co-operation and constant support without which we might have not been able
We are sincerely grateful to our head of Department of Civil Engineering, Mr. R.K GUPTA for
We also express our gratitude to our college for providing us the infrastructure to carry out the
project and to all staff-member who were directly or indirectly instrumented in enabling us to
ADEEL ATA
(4)
AVANEESH KUMAR
DEEPAK SINGH YADAV
DIVYANSHU AWASTHI
PRATEEK SRIVASTAVA
BBDEC
PREFACE
Earthquakes constitute one of the greatest hazards of life and property on the earth. Due to
suddenness of their occurrence, they are least understood and most dreaded. The earthquake
The field of Earthquake Engineering has existed in our country for over 35 years now.
Indian earthquake engineers have made significant contributions to the seismic safety of several
important structures in the country. However, as the recent earthquakes have shown, the
performance of normal structures during past Indian earthquakes has been less satisfactory. This
is mainly due to the lack of awareness amongst most practising engineers of the special
provisions that need to be followed in earthquake resistant design and thereafter in construction.
Earthquakes are among the most powerful events on earth, and their results can be terrifying.
An earthquake in general does not kill people directly. Instead, many deaths and injuries result
from the collapse of buildings, bridges, and other structures. We cannot prevent natural disasters
from striking, but we can prevent or limit their impact by making buildings strong enough to
resist their destructive forces. This can be achieved by earth quake resistant structures. In the
case of earthquakes, it is possible to neutralize their harm by applying basic engineering and
(5)
planning principles that are inexpensive. This paper presents the brief essentials of earthquake
resistant construction and a few techniques to improve the resistance of building and building
(6)
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter 1
Figure 1.1 Multi Storey Building 3
Chapter 2
Figure 2.1 Total Horizontal Earthquake force in a building increases downwards
Along its heights.
Figure 2.2 Floor bends with the Beam but moves all columns at that level together.
Figure 2.3 Infill walls move together with the columns under earthquake shaking.
Figure 2.4 two distinct designs of building that result in different earthquake performances-
Columns should be stronger than Beams.
Figure 2.6 Reinforced concrete shear walls in buildings an excellent structural system for
Earthquake resistance.
Figure 2.7 Shear walls must be symmetric in plan layout twist in buildings can be
avoided.
Figure 2.8 Layout of main reinforcement in shear walls as per IS:13920-1993 detailing is
the key to good seismic performance.
Chapter 5
Figure 5.1 Base-Isolated and Fixed-Base Buildings.
(7)
Figure 5.3 Damping Device Installed with Brace.
Chapter 6
Figure 6.1 Damage caused by Earthquake in Walls.
(8)
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
BBDEC
ABSTRACT
A major part of design for earthquake resistance involves the building structure, which has
primary role in preventing serious damage or structural collapse. Over the years, earthquake has
been the cause of great disasters in the form of destruction of property and injury and loss of life
to the population. One major measure to mitigate the earthquake hazards is to design and build
structures through better engineering practices, so that these structures possess adequate
earthquake-resistant capacity.
members of similar groups such as beams, columns and braces of similar nature share the same
demand-capacity ratios regardless of their location within the group. The fundamental idea
behind this presentation is that seismic structural response is largely a function of design and
construction, rather than analysis. Both strength and stiffness are induced rather than
investigated. Failure mechanisms and stability conditions are enforced rather than tested.
Structures of Uniform Response are expected to sustain relatively large inelastic displacements
during major earthquakes. A simple technique has been proposed to control and address the
gradual softening of such structures due to local/partial instabilities and formation of plastic
hinges. In structures of uniform response, the magnitude and shape of distribution of lateral
forces affects the distribution of story stiffness in proportion with story moments, therefore
affecting the dynamic behaviour of the system as a whole. Simple closed form formulae
describing the nonlinear behaviour of moment frames of uniform response have been proposed.
(9)
While the scope of this contribution is limited to moment frames, the proposed method can
LIST OF TABLES
Chapter 2
Chapter 4
(10)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER PAGE
Certificate
Declaration
Preface
Abstract
Table of Content
List of Figure
List of Tables
TERMINOLOGY.
MOTION ...79
Chapter 8) CONCLUSION .. 86
9) BIBLIOGROPHY . 89
(12)
(13)