Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Yu Chuan Lin1, a, Shenq Tsong Chang1,b, Long Jeng Lee1,c,Ting Ming Huang1,d
1
Instrument Technology Research Center, National Applied Research Laboratories,
300 Hsinchu, Taiwan
a
yclin@itrc.narl.org.tw, stc@itrc.narl.org.tw, cljlee@itrc.narl.org.tw, dtmw@itrc.narl.org.tw
b
Abstract. The paper presents an optomechanical design and analysis of the mirror mount integrated
for Cassegrain telescope. The finite element method and Zernike polynomials calculation are applied
to evaluate the optical surface distortion. The deformation due to a gravity load from each of the
different mirror mounting position is predicted. The optimization of mirror mounting position and the
minimum of optical wave front error are discussed in this paper.
1. Introduction
The large mirrors and lenses have been extensively adopted in various applications such as telescope
and laser optical systems. The large mirrors are more difficult to mount or support than lenses
because the mirrors are significantly more sensitive to distortion than lenses. The mirror has a single
optical surface will exhibit the doubles error as light is reflected. The large optical system requires
applicable and compact support structures that mitigate and isolate the optical parts from mechanical
and thermal loads. In the aspect of mechanical loads are gravity, vibration and residual stress that
might distort optical surface and induce deformation. The surface deformation plays an important
role in large diameter optics system with lightweight mirror. The mirror deformation produces almost
entirely aberrations of astigmatism, coma and trefoil due to inapplicable supports and mounts.
Therefore, the coma and trefoil effect can be readily corrected by adjust or active optics. But it is very
difficult to correct the astigmatism caused by gravity load and inapplicable mounting. The
kinematical support and iso-static mount are popular types of design for large mirror mount in the
Cassegrain telescopes such that they constrain three orthogonal axes without redundant degree of
freedom [1-4].
This paper presents the development of applicable and stable mirror mount as well as the
application to a primary mirror with outer diameter of 296 mm and inner diameter of 112 mm large
mirror for the Cassegrain telescope as shown in Fig. 1. The mirror is light-weighted with hexagonal in
shape with inscribed circle diameter of 40 mm and cell-rib thickness of 5 mm as shown in Fig. 2. The
mirror is mounted to the main plate by the mean of three bipods at near the center of gravity to prevent
from bending moment at the fixed bipods as show in Fig. 3. The integrated optomechanical analysis
of single light-weighted mirror and that the mirror was mounted onto the main plate by three bipods
have been discussed in the previous studies [5-6]. The integrated optomechanical design and analysis
for the support structure of primary mirror are developed in this paper, which includes the
optimization of the mirror mounting position and minimum wavefront error.
Fig. 2. Light-weight design of the primary mirror Fig. 3. Mount design of the primary mirror
54
with EMT result with the difference about 0.55% and 3.30 %. This reliable model further
demonstrates that the static behavior and combined with optomechanical analysis.
55
(a) Mounting position (b) FEA deformation
Fig. 5. The static analysis of primary mirror mounting position at located Z = 18.5 mm
Fig. 6. The static analysis of primary mirror mounting position at located Z = 6.95 mm
ISM (1) ISM (2) ISM (3) ISM (4) ISM (5) ISM (6) ISM (7) ISM (8) ISM (9)
R.M.S () 0.177 0.0985 0.0184 0.00995 0.0355 0.0786 0.116 0.149 0.183
P-V () 0.723 0.401 0.0759 0.052 0.176 0.387 0.533 0.701 0.864
Astig. () 0.3591 0.19966 0.03703 0.018509 0.0816 0.177 0.260 0.342 0.421
= 632 nm
56
Fig.7. Optical surface deformation represented by Zernike polynomials at located Z = 18.5 mm
4. Summary
The optimization of mirror mounting position and the minimum of optical wavefront error are
discussed in this paper. The result shows that the optimal mounting position is located at Z = 6.95 mm
in the present primary mirror design. The magnitude of the Zernike polynomials calculation gives the
wavefront error of R.M.S value of 0.00995, P.V value of 0.052 and primary astigmatism value of
0.0185. An integrated optomechanical analysis using FEA combined with Zernike polynomials is
successfully to optimum of mirror mounting design in the Cassegrain telescope.
References
[1] P. R. Yoder, Techniques for Mounting Prisms, Mounting Optics in Optical Instruments,
Washington: SPIE Press, pp.193-208, 2002.
[2] P. R. Yoder, Design Considerations for Mirrors with Large Diameter to Thickness Ratios,
Optomechanical Design, San Diego: SPIE Press, pp.207-231, 1993.
[3] B. J. Thompson, Mounting Small Mirror and Prisms, Optomechanical System Design, New York:
Marcel Dekker, pp.271-320, 1993.
[4] D. Chin, Optical Mirror-Mount Design and Philosophy, Applied Optics, Vol.3, No.7, pp.895-901,
1964.
57
[5] Y. C. Lin, L. J. Lee, S. T. Chang, Y. C. Cheng and T. M. Huang: Numerical and Experimental
Analysis of Light-weighted Primary Mirror for Cassegrain Telescope, Applied Mechanics and
Materials, Vol.52-54, pp59-64, 2011.
[6] Y. C. Lin, L. J. Lee, P. H. Huang, C. Y. Chan,, Y. C. Cheng and T. M. Huang: Finite Element
Model Verification for Light-weighted Mirror Mounted onto Main-Plate by Experimental Modal
Testing, Information Engineering Letters, Vol.1, No.1, pp.49-54, 2011.
[7] Y. C. Lin, L. J. Lee, S.T. Chang, T. M. Huang and C. H. Hwang: Design and Simulation of
Lightweight Mirror for Space Application, Proceedings of Design, Test, Integration and
Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS, pp.334-337, 2009.
[8] Y. C. Lin, L. J. Lee, S.T. Chang, T. M. Huang and C. H. Hwang: Integrated Optomechanical
Analysis of Large Optical Mirror for Space-based Telescope System, Proceedings of
International Conference on Manufacturing and Engineering System, pp.624-627, 2009.
[9] J. C. Wyant and K. Creath: Basic Wavefront Aberration Theory for Optical Metrology, Applied
Optics and Optical Engineering, Vol. XI, Chapter 1, Academic Press, pp.1-39, 1992.
58